Why are adults exposed to liquid laundry detergent capsules?

INTRODUCTION

Exposures to liquid laundry detergent capsules in adults are less well characterized than in children.

METHODS

All enquiries to the Centro Antiveleni di Milano regarding adults (>18 years) who were exposed to these capsules between July 2010 and July 2023 were analyzed. Enquiries were followed up with one or more recalls depending on the severity of the patient.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 127 adults were exposed. The age distribution was as follows: 34 patients were aged 18-39 years, 29 were 40-59 years, 24 were 60-79 years, 26 were 80-96 years, and the age was unknown in 14. Exposure occurred mainly as a result of ingestion alone (n = 54), skin contact alone (n = 23), and eye contact alone (n = 31). Oral exposure without swallowing occurred in nine cases, and inhalation of the odour from a disintegrated capsule in four. Multiple routes of exposure were involved in six patients. Thirty-four (63 per cent) of the 54 ingestions occurred in those with dementia or intellectual disability, and three patients in this group died. Dermal or eye exposures did not involve those with dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the majority of adults in Italy who ingest liquid laundry detergent capsules are suffering from dementia or other cognitive impairment.

Surveillance of paediatric exposures to liquid laundry detergent pods in Italy

OBJECTIVE

To analyse paediatric exposures to pod and traditional laundry detergents in Italy and changes in exposure trends.

METHODS

Analyses of a series of patients aged <5 years and exposed to laundry detergents between September 2010 and June 2015, identified by the National Poison Control in Milan.

RESULTS

In comparison with patients exposed to traditional laundry detergents (n=1150), a higher proportion of those exposed to pods (n=1649) were managed in hospital (68% vs 42%), had clinical effects (75% vs 22%) and moderate/high severity outcomes (13% vs <1%). Exposure rates were stable over time for traditional detergents (average 0.65 cases/day), but an abrupt decline in major company pods was seen in December 2012, 4 months after the introduction of opaque outer packaging (from 1.03 to 0.36 cases/day and from 1.88 to 0.86 cases/million units sold). The odds of clinical effects was higher for exposure to pods than for traditional detergents (OR=10.8; 95% CI 9.0 to 12.9). Among patients exposed to pods, the odds of moderate/high severity outcomes was four times higher for children aged <1 years than for the other age groups (OR=3.9; 95% CI 2.2 to 7.0). Ten children exposed to laundry detergent pods had high severity outcomes while no children exposed to traditional laundry detergents developed high severity effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that exposure to laundry detergent pods is more dangerous than exposure to traditional detergents. In Italy, 4 months after the introduction of opaque outer packaging by a major company, product-specific exposure rates decreased sharply, suggesting that reducing visibility of laundry detergent pods may be an effective preventive measure. Further efforts are needed to improve safety.

A case of contact dermatitis to dimethylfumarate in shoes identified in Italy

The present paper describes a case of shoe contact dermatitis from DMF identified by the Poison Control Centre of Milan (PCCM), Italy, in 2009. A 35 year old woman was affected by irritant reactions while wearing shoes contaminated with DMF. Exposure to these shoes was limited to a 8 hour period and was not repeated. In the following days the patient suffered feet blistering and swelling limited to the area in contact with shoe vamp. Topical application of cortisone did not prevent development of bullous eczema. After 20 days from exposure, the lesions were healed but the skin remained red, dry and very sensitive. Chemical analyses of shoes quantified an average concentration of DMF of 383 mg/kg. The patient refused to be patch tested. The observation here reported confirm that DMF should be considered a possible causal agent in shoe contact dermatitis. Documentation of cases exposed to this chemical provide a relevant support to characterize clinical manifestations and to identifying contaminated articles.

Surveillance of toxic exposures: the pilot experience of the Poison Control Centers of Milan, Pavia and Bergamo in 2006

Between 1 February and 31 March 2006, the Poison Control Centers (PPC) active in Lombardy collaborated with an integrated surveillance system carried out in Piedmont during the Olympic Games 2006. The collaborating PPC notified to the system 697 human cases of exposure occurred in Piedmont during the observation period. Among these cases, 70% were exposed accidentally, 40% were 6 years old or younger, and 45% reported at least a clinical effect. The agents more frequently reported were: cleaning substances (household) (110 cases), fumes/gases/vapors (63 cases, comprising 38 cases accidentally exposed to carbon monoxide), and sedative/hypnotics/antipsychotics (53 cases). Although very limited, the available observations focused the attention on specific hazards and were able to highlight the potential of a toxic exposure surveillance system based on the information reported by the Italian PPC.

[Pesticide poisoning referred to the Poison Center of Milan in 1995-1998]

From 1995 through 1998 the Poison Control Centre of Milan identified 7594 cases of suspected or confirmed cases of acute pesticide poisoning. Domestic use products accounted for 4483 (59%) of the cases. Of these, 84% occurred at home and 48% in children under five. The most frequently reported domestic use products were pyrethrins/pyrethroids (26%), fertilizers (19%) and camphor/naphthalene (12%). Of 3111 cases (41%) due to agricultural products, 10% were children under five and 69% were males. Half of the poisonings from agricultural products occurred at home, the remainder at workplace. The products most frequently reported were organophosphates (26%), pyrethrins/pyrethroids (9%), and carbamates (9%). These preliminary data indicate the importance of implementing prevention programs to reduce pesticide poisonings with particular reference to young children.

Experience with hair testing in the clinical biochemistry laboratory of Ca' Granda Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy

In our laboratory, analysis of human hair for drugs of abuse detection was first performed in 1980. In the last 10 years we have processed about 2000 subjects/year ('living subjects' only). In the last 3 years we have also introduced hair analysis of cocaine: at first only in clinical applications, but for the last 2 years this analysis is now routine. Our application of hair analysis includes: clinical toxicology, medico-legal and administrative agencies. Requests come for example from several Committees for Driving Licenses, Addiction Treatment Centers and Legal Authorities. Hair samples are currently collected from the occipital area at the back of the head, which appears to show less variability in hair growth rate. At present we perform hair analysis using highly sensitive radioimmunoassay screening methods for the detection of parent drug and/or metabolites. All positive cases of cocaine and opiates abuse are confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in electron impact or chemical ionization mode. Positive cases for opiates are also analysed using a specific morphine radioimmunoassay kit. Data show that, when the opiates/morphine ratio is higher than 6, we are dealing with consumption of codeine and/or dihydrocodeine. In our routine work last year there were 177 (263 samples) positive opiates subjects out of 2244 patients; positive cocaine subjects were 290 (362 samples) out of 2001 patients. Guidelines for hair analysis in Lombardia have been established based on the experience of our laboratory. Furthermore it will be possible to apply a unique protocol for all Committees for Driving Licenses, involving hair testing in addition to urine assay.