Case manager-assisted rehabilitation for lumbar spinal fusion patients: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cost-effectiveness of case manager-assisted rehabilitation as an add-on to usual physical rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion, given the lack of any clinical benefits found on analysing the clinical data.

DESIGN

Economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up.

SETTING

Patients from the outpatient clinics of a university hospital and a general hospital.

SUBJECTS

A total of 82 lumbar spinal fusion patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized one-to-one to case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme as an add-on to usual physical rehabilitation or to usual physical rehabilitation.

MAIN MEASURES

Oswestry Disability Index and EuroQol 5-dimension. Danish preference weights were used to estimate quality-adjusted life years. Costs were estimated from micro costing and national registries. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. Costs and effects were presented with means (95% confidence interval (CI)). The incremental net benefit was estimated for a range of hypothetical values of willingness to pay per gain in effects.

RESULTS

No impact of case manager-assisted rehabilitation on the Oswestry Disability Index or estimate quality-adjusted life years was observed. Intervention cost was Euros 3984 (3468; 4499), which was outweighed by average reductions in inpatient resource use and sickness leave. A cost reduction of Euros 1716 (-16,651; 20,084) was found in the case manager group. Overall, the probability for the case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme being cost-effective did not exceed a probability of 56%, regardless of willingness to pay. Sensitivity analysis did not change the conclusion.

CONCLUSION

This case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme was unlikely to be cost-effective.

Does adding case management to standard rehabilitation affect functional ability, pain, or the rate of return to work after lumbar spinal fusion? A randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of a case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme as an add-on to usual physical rehabilitation in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial with a two-year follow-up.

SETTINGS

Outpatient clinics of a university hospital and a general hospital.

SUBJECTS

In total, 82 patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomized one-to-one to case manager-assisted rehabilitation (case manager group) or no case manager-assisted rehabilitation (control group). Both groups received usual physical rehabilitation. The case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme included a preoperative meeting with a case manager to determine a rehabilitation plan, postsurgical meetings, phone meetings, and voluntary workplace visits or roundtable meetings.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes were back pain, leg pain, and return to work.

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients in the case manager group, 49% were men, with the mean age of 46.1 (±8.7 years). In the control group, 51% were male, with the mean age of 47.4 (±8.9 years). No statistically significant between-group differences were found regarding any outcomes. An overall group effect of 4.1 points (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.8; 9.9) was found on the Oswestry Disability Index, favouring the control group. After two years, the relative risk of return to work was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.8; 1.7), favouring the case manager group.

CONCLUSION

The case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme had no effect on the patients' functional disability or back and leg pain compared to usual physical rehabilitation. The study lacked power to evaluate the impact on return to work.

Preoperative cognitive-behavioural intervention improves in-hospital mobilisation and analgesic use for lumbar spinal fusion patients

BACKGROUND

Catastrophic thinking and fear-avoidance belief are negatively influencing severe acute pain following surgery causing delayed ambulation and discharge. We aimed to examine if a preoperative intervention of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) could influence the early postsurgical outcome following lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSF).

METHODS

Ninety patients undergoing LSF due to degenerative spinal disorders were randomly allocated to either the CBT group or the control group. Both groups received surgery and postoperative rehabilitation. In addition, the CBT group received a preoperative intervention focussed on pain coping using a CBT approach. Primary outcome was back pain during the first week (0-10 scale). Secondary outcomes were mobility, analgesic consumption, and length of hospitalisation. Data were retrieved using self-report questionnaires, assessments made by physical therapists and from medical records.

RESULTS

No difference between the groups' self-reported back pain (p = 0.76) was detected. Independent mobility was reached by a significantly larger number of patients in the CBT group than the control group during the first three postoperative days. Analgesic consumption tended to be lower in the CBT group, whereas length of hospitalisation was unaffected by the CBT intervention.

CONCLUSION

Participation in a preoperative CBT intervention appeared to facilitate mobility in the acute postoperative phase, despite equally high levels of self-reported acute postsurgical pain in the two groups, and a slightly lower intake of rescue analgesics in the CBT group. This may reflect an overall improved ability to cope with pain following participation in the preoperative CBT intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Danish Protection Agency (2011-41-5899) and the Ethics Committee of the Central Denmark Region (M-20110047). The trial was registered in Current Controlled Trials ( ISRCTN42281022 ).

Description and design considerations of a randomized clinical trial investigating the effect of a multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioural intervention for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery

Background

The ideal rehabilitation strategy following lumbar spinal fusion surgery has not yet been established. This paper is a study protocol, describing the rationale behind and the details of a cognitive-behavioural rehabilitation intervention for lumbar spinal fusion patients based on the best available evidence. Predictors of poor outcome following spine surgery have been identified to provide targets for the intervention, and the components of the intervention were structured in accordance with the cognitive-behavioural model. The study aims to compare the clinical and economical effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioural rehabilitation strategy to that of usual care for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Methods/Design

The study is a randomized clinical trial including 96 patients scheduled for lumbar spinal fusion surgery due to degenerative disease or spondylolisthesis. Patients were recruited in the period October 2011 to July 2013, and the follow-up period is one year from date of surgery. Patients are allocated on a 1:2 ratio (control: intervention) to either treatment as usual (control group), which implies surgery and the standard postoperative rehabilitation, or in addition to this, a patient education focusing on pain behaviour and pain coping (intervention group). It takes place in a hospital setting, and consists of six group-based sessions, managed by a multidisciplinary team of health professionals.

The primary outcomes are disability (Oswestry Disability Index) and sick leave, while secondary outcomes include coping (Coping Strategies Questionnaire), fear-avoidance belief (Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire), pain (Low Back Pain Rating Scale, pain index), mobility during hospitalization (Cumulated Ambulation Score), generic health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) and resource use. Outcomes are measured using self report questionnaires, medical records and national registers.

Discussion

It is expected that the intervention can provide better functional outcome, less pain and earlier return to work after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. By combining knowledge and evidence from different knowledge areas, the project aims to provide new knowledge that can create greater consistency in patient treatment. We expect that the results can make a significant contribution to development of guidelines for good rehabilitation of patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN42281022.

The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure's semi-structured interview: its applicability to lumbar spinal fusion patients. A prospective randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

Although lumbar spinal fusion has been performed for more than 70 years, few studies have examined rehabilitation strategies for spinal fusion patients, and there is only sparse information about the patient's activity level after surgery. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a standardized semi-structured interview, developed to identify patients' problems in relation to activities of daily living (ADL). The COPM has neither been examined in a randomised clinical study nor employed in relation to lumbar spinal fusion patients. We aimed to examine whether or not the use of the semi-structured interview COPM during in-hospital rehabilitation could: (1) identify more ADL-related problems of importance to the patients after discharge from the hospital, (2) enhance the patients' ADL performance after discharge from hospital

METHOD

Eighty-seven patients undergoing a lumbar spinal fusion caused by degenerative diseases were randomly assigned to either use of the COPM or to standard treatment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Use of the COPM during hospitalization helped in identifying more ADL problems encountered by patients during the first 3 months post-discharge period as COPM served to identify more treatment goals and plans of action. Use of the COPM had no impact on the patients' ADL performance, and the difference is so small that COPM may be of little clinical consequence.

Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D in long-lasting low back pain

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the interchangeability of the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) and the Short Form 6D (SF-6D) in individuals with long-lasting low back pain to guide the optimal choice of instrument and to inform decision-makers about any between-measure discrepancy, which require careful interpretation of the results of cost-utility evaluations.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted across 275 individuals who had spinal surgery on indication of chronic low back pain. EQ-5D and SF-6D were mailed to respondents for self-completion. Statistical analysis of between-measure agreement (using English weights) was based on Bland and Altman's limits of agreement and a series of linear regressions.

RESULTS

A moderate mean difference of 0.085 (SD 0.241) was found, but because it masked more severe bidirectional variation, the expected variation between observations of EQ-5D and SF-6D in future studies was estimated at 0.546. The EQ-5D's N3 term alone explained a factor of 0.79 of the variation in between-measure differences, while the explanatory value of adding variables of age, sex, diagnosis, previous surgery, and occupational status was basically zero. A final model including only dummy variables for the N3 term and five identified framing effects explained a factor of 0.86 of the variation in between-measure differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the EQ-5D and the SF-6D are both psychometrically valid for generic outcome assessment in long-lasting low back pain, it appears that they cannot generally be used interchangeably for measurement of preference values. Sensitivity analysis examining the impact of between-measure discrepancy thus remains a necessary condition for the interpretation of the results of cost-utility evaluations.

[Cost-effectiveness in lumbar spinal fusion]

This article summarizes the current level of evidence for cost-effectiveness in lumbar spinal fusion. Several economic evaluations have recently been conducted alongside randomized controlled trials, but choices of populations and comparators are diverse. Overall, cost-effectiveness depends on clinical outcomes, but there is some evidence that the best technology leads to extra-hospital cost-savings. The optimal technique, therefore, remains a clinical research question.

Early Clinical & Radiographic Results of NFix II Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System

Background

Complications associated with rigid posterior instrumented fusions of the lumbar spine include pseudarthrosis, accelerated adjacent-segment disease, hardware failure, and iatrogenic fixed sagittal imbalance. Posterior pedicle screw/rod-based dynamic stabilization systems, in which semirigid rods or cords are used to restrict or control, rather than completely eliminate spinal segmental motion, aim to reduce or eliminate these fusion-associated drawbacks. In this study, we analyzed the early radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients treated with the NFix II System (N Spine, Inc., San Diego, California), a novel pedicle screw/ rod-based system used as a nonfusion posterior dynamic stabilization system, and compared our results to those of similar systems currently in use.

Methods

Seven sites participated in a retrospective assessment of 40 consecutive patients who underwent dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the NFix II System at a single level. (One patient underwent 2 single-level dynamic constructs at noncontiguous levels (L3-4 and L5-S1).) Patients were included based on the presence of spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, adjacent segment degeneration, recurrent disc herniation, symptomatic degenerative disc disease, and degenerative scoliosis requiring dynamic stabilization at 1 level with or without instrumented rigid fusion at a contiguous level. Participants were evaluated preoperatively, with planned postoperative assessments at 3 and 6 weeks (1 center assessed patients at 4 weeks), 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary clinical outcome measures at each assessment were visual analogue scale (VAS) scores to measure back pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)¹ scores to measure function. Radiographic outcome measurements included evidence of instrumentation failure and range of motion (ROM) based on postoperative flexion-extension radiographs at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

Forty patients (15males, 25 females) with a mean age of 55 years (range 21–81) were included. Average follow-up was 8.1 months (range 6–12). The mean VAS score improved from 7.6 preoperatively to 3.3 postoperatively (P < .001), and the ODI score from 47.3 to 22.8 (P < .001). Eighty percent of patients were severely disabled or worse (ODI ≥ 41) preoperatively, which was reduced to 13% postoperatively. Of the 10 patients with more than 6 months’ follow-up, only 4 demonstrated adequate flexion/extension effort. ROM measurements in those 4 patients showed that on average 53% of preoperative segmental motion was retained at the dynamically stabilized level 6 months postoperatively. There were no instrumentation-related complications.

Conclusions

Results of this limited study indicate that the NFix II System when used as a nonfusion device for dynamic stabilization produces significant improvements in pain and function at short-term follow-up with outcomes comparable to other dynamic stabilization systems. The use of this system was not associated with an increased risk of instrumentation failure. The small number of patients with postoperative severe disability or worse compares favorably to long-term published data on posterolateral fusion. Lastly, in this small sample, ROM was preserved at 6-month follow-up.

Clinical Relevance

Posterior pedicle screw/rod dynamic stabilization using the NFix II System seems very effective in improving pain and function scores, at least in the short term (mean postoperative ODI of 22.8). Preservation of ROM is also possible. Longerterm follow-up is necessary to assess sustained clinical improvement, hardware complications, and maintenance in segmental ROM. The NFix II System may be considered an effective alternative to existing dynamic stabilization systems. This device is cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as an adjunct to fusion and has the European CE Marking for use in both fusion and nonfusion applications.

Costs and effects in lumbar spinal fusion. A follow-up study in 136 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain

Although cost-effectiveness is becoming the foremost evaluative criterion within health service management of spine surgery, scientific knowledge about cost-patterns and cost-effectiveness is limited. The aims of this study were (1) to establish an activity-based method for costing at the patient-level, (2) to investigate the correlation between costs and effects, (3) to investigate the influence of selected patient characteristics on cost-effectiveness and, (4) to investigate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of (a) posterior instrumentation and (b) intervertebral anterior support in lumbar spinal fusion. We hypothesized a positive correlation between costs and effects, that determinants of effects would also determine cost-effectiveness, and that posterolateral instrumentation and anterior intervertebral support are cost-effective adjuncts in posterolateral lumbar fusion. A cohort of 136 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain, who were surgically treated from January 2001 through January 2003, was followed until 2 years postoperatively. Operations took place at University Hospital of Aarhus and all patients had either (1) non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion, (2) instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion, or (3) instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion + anterior intervertebral support. Analysis of costs was performed at the patient-level, from an administrator's perspective, by means of Activity-Based-Costing. Clinical effects were measured by means of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire and the Low Back Pain Rating Scale at baseline and 2 years postoperatively. Regression models were used to reveal determinants for costs and effects. Costs and effects were analyzed as a net-benefit measure to reveal determinants for cost-effectiveness, and finally, adjusted analysis (for non-random allocation of patients) was performed in order to reveal the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of (a) posterior instrumentation and (b) anterior support. The costs of non-instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion were estimated at DKK 88,285(95% CI 81,369;95,546), instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion at DKK 94,396(95% CI 89,865;99,574) and instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion + anterior intervertebral support at DKK 120,759(95% CI 111,981;133,738). The net-benefit of the regimens was significantly affected by smoking and functional disability in psychosocial life areas. Multi-level fusion and surgical technique significantly affected the net-benefit as well. Surprisingly, no correlation was found between treatment costs and treatment effects. Incremental analysis suggested that the probability of posterior instrumentation being cost-effective was limited, whereas the probability of anterior intervertebral support being cost-effective escalates as willingness-to-pay per effect unit increases. This study reveals useful and hitherto unknown information both about cost-patterns at the patient-level and determinants of cost-effectiveness. The overall conclusion of the present investigation is a recommendation to focus further on determinants of cost-effectiveness. For example, patient characteristics that are modifiable at a relatively low expense may have greater influence on cost-effectiveness than the surgical technique itself--at least from an administrator's perspective.

Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24

A retrospectively designed long-term follow-up study of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who had completed treatment, of at least 2 years, by means of brace, surgery, or both brace and surgery. This study is to assess the outcome after treatment for AIS by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument 24 (SRS 24). One hundred and eighteen AIS patients (99 females and 19 males), treated at the Aarhus University Hospital from January 1, 1987 to December 31, 1997, were investigated with at least 2 years follow-up at the time of receiving a posted self-administered questionnaire. Forty-four patients were treated with Boston brace (B) only, 41 patients had surgery (S), and 33 patients were treated both with brace and surgery (BS). The Cobb angles of the three treatment groups did not differ significantly after completed treatment. The outcome in terms of the total SRS 24 score was not significantly different among the three groups. B patients had a significantly better general (not treatment related) self-image and higher general activity level than the total group of surgically treated patients, while surgically treated patients scored significantly better in post-treatment self-image and satisfaction. Comparing B with BS we found a significantly higher general activity level in B patients, while the BS group had significantly higher satisfaction. There were no significant differences between BS and S patients in any of the domain scores. All treatment groups scored "fair or better" in all domain scores of the SRS 24 questionnaire, except in post-treatment function, where all groups scored worse than "fair". Improvement of appearance by means of surgical correction increases mean scores for post-treatment self-image and post-treatment satisfaction. Double-treatment by brace and surgery does not appear to jeopardize a good final outcome.

Healing properties of allograft from alendronate-treated animal in lumbar spine interbody cage fusion

This study investigated the healing potential of allograft from bisphosphonate-treated animals in anterior lumbar spine interbody fusion. Three levels of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with Brantigan cages were performed in two groups of five landrace pigs. Empty Brantigan cages or cages filled with either autograft or allograft were located randomly at different levels. The allograft materials for the treatment group were taken from the pigs that had been fed with alendronate, 10 mg daily for 3 months. The histological fusion rate was 2/5 in alendronate-treated allograft and 3/5 in non-treated allograft. The mean bone volume was 39% and 37.2% in alendronate-treated or non-treated allograft (NS), respectively. No statistical difference was found between the same grafted cage comparing two groups. The histological fusion rate was 7/10 in all autograft cage levels and 5/10 in combined allograft cage levels. No fusion was found at all in empty cage levels. With the numbers available, no statistically significant difference was found in histological fusion between autograft and allograft applications. There was a significant difference of mean bone volume between autograft (49.2%) and empty cage (27.5%) (P<0.01). In conclusion, this study did not demonstrate different healing properties of alendronate-treated and non-treated allograft for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in pigs.

Stabilisation surgery for chronic low back pain: indications, surgical procedures, and outcome

Spinal fusion was introduced as a treatment option for chronic low back pain >70 years ago. However, few areas of spinal surgery have caused as much controversy. The debate about whether to use an anterior-, posterior- or anterior + posterior approach has persisted since the 1930s. Within the last 10 years, the effects of different spinal fusion procedures have been tested in 10 randomized controlled trails (RCT). A highly significant improvement over preoperative status was found in all 10 studies. Two recent RCTs have dealt with the question of conservative versus operative treatment of patients with low back pain, and both studies have shown a significant better functional outcome for spinal fusion in situ, compared with a more or less organized exercise programme at 2-year follow-up. The choice of postoperative rehabilitation strategy has also been shown to be of importance for overall functional outcome. One study has demonstrated the importance of the inclusion of coping schemes, and questioned the role of intensive exercises in a rehabilitation programme for spinal fusion patients.

Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) has become one of the most common causes of disability in adults under 45 years of age and is consequently one of the most common reasons for early retirement in industrialised societies. Accordingly, CLBP represents an expensive drain on society's resources and is a very challenging area for which a consensus for rational therapy is yet to be established. The spinal fusion procedure was introduced as a treatment option for CLBP more than 70 years ago. However, few areas of spinal surgery have caused so much controversy as spinal fusion. The literature reveals divergent opinions about when fusion is indicated and how it should be performed. Furthermore, the significance of the role of postoperative rehabilitation following spinal fusion may be underestimated. There exists no consensus on the design of a program specific for rehabilitation. Ideally, for any given surgical procedure, it should be possible to identify not only possible complications relative to a surgical procedure, but also what symptoms may be expected, and what pain behaviour may be expected of a particular patient. The overall aims of the current studies were: 1) to introduce patient-based functional outcome evaluation into spinal fusion treatment; 2) to evaluate radiological assessment of different spinal fusion procedures; 3) to investigate the effect of titanium versus stainless steel pedicle screws on mechanical fixation and bone ingrowth in lumbar spinal fusion; 4) to analyse the clinical and radiological outcome of different lumbar spinal fusion techniques; 5) to evaluate complications and re-operation rates following different surgical procedures; and 6) to analyse the effect of different rehabilitation strategies for lumbar spinal fusion patients. The present thesis comprises 9 studies: 2 clinical retrospective studies, 1 clinical prospective case/reference study, 5 clinical randomised prospective studies and 1 animal study (Mini-pigs). In total, 594 patients were included in the investigation from 1979 to 1999. Each had prior to inclusion at least 2 years of CLBP and had therefore been subjected to most of the conservative treatment leg pain, due to localized isthmic spondylolisthesis grades I-II or primary or secondary degeneration. PATIENT-BASED FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME: Patients' self-reported parameters should include the impact of CLBP on daily activity, work and leisure time activities, anxiety/depression, social interests and intensity of back and leg pain. Between 1993 and 2003 approximately 1400 lumbar spinal fusion patients completed the Dallas Pain Questionnaire under prospective design studies. In 1996, the Low Back Pain Rating scale was added to the standard questionnaire packet distributed among spinal fusion patients. In our experience, these tools are valid instruments for clinical assessment of candidates for spinal fusion procedures.

RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

It is extremely difficult to interpret radiographs of both lumbar posterolateral fusion and anterior interbody fusion. Plain radiographs are clearly not the perfect media for analysis of spinal fusion, but until new and better diagnostic methods are available for clinical use, radiographs will remain the golden standard. Therefore, the development of a detailed reliable radiographic classification system is highly desirable. The classification used in the present thesis for the evaluation of posteroalteral spinal fusion, both with and without instrumentation, demonstrated good interobserver and intraobserver agreement. The classification showed acceptable reliability and may be one way to improve interstudy and intrastudy correlation of radiologic outcomes after posterolateral spinal fusion. Radiology-based evaluation of anterior lumbar interbody fusion is further complicated when cages are employed. The use of different cage designs and materials makes it almost impossible to establish a standard radiological classification system for anterior fusions. BONE-SCREW INTERFACE: Mechanical binding at the bone-screw interface was significantly greater for titanium pedicle screws than it was for stainless steel. This could be explained by the fact that the titanium screws had superior bone on-growth. There was no correlation between screw removal torques and pull-out strength. Clinically, the use of titanium and titanium-alloy pedicle screws may be preferable for osteoporotic patients and those with decreased osteogenesis.

OUTCOME

The present series of studies observed significant long-term functional improvement for approximately 70% of patients who had undergone lumbar spinal fusion procedure. Solid fusion as determined from radiographs ranged from 52% to 92% depending on the choice of surgical procedure. The choice of surgical procedure should relate to the diagnosis, as patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis (Grades I and II) are best served with posterolateral fusion without instrumentation, and patients with disc degeneration seem to gain most from instrumented posterolateral fusion or circumferential fusion.

COMPLICATIONS

The number of perioperative complications increased with the use of pedicle screw systems to support posterolateral fusions and increased further with the use of circumferential fusions. There was no significant association between outcome result and perioperative complications. The risk of reoperation within 2 years after the spinal fusion procedure was, however, significantly lower for those who had received circumferential fusion in comparison to posterolateral fusion with instrumentation. Furthermore, the risk of non-union was found to be significantly lower for patients who had received circumferential fusion as compared to posterolateral fusion with and without instrumentation. The complications of sexual dysfunction and fusion at non-intended levels were found to be significant but without influence on the overall outcome.

REHABILITATION

The patients in the Back-café group performed a succession of many daily tasks significantly better and moreover had less pain compared with both the Video and Training groups 2 years after lumbar spinal fusion. The Video group had significantly greater treatment demands outside the hospital system. This study demonstrates the importance of the inclusion of coping schemes and questions the role of intensive exercises in a rehabilitation program for spinal fusion patients.

In vitro osteoblast proliferation as a predictor for spinal fusion mass

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The biological factors determining a successful spinal fusion have not yet been fully determined.

PURPOSE

To determine the influence of graft cell vigor on fusion rate and fusion mass using in vitro osteoblast proliferation as a predictor.

STUDY DESIGN

Animal study randomizing to posterolateral fusion with autograft with or without pedicle-screw instrumentation.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Twenty adult Göttingen mini-pigs.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Fusion rate measured both with X-ray and computed tomography (CT) as well as amount of fusion mass determined with three-dimensional CT.

METHODS

Animals underwent posterolateral fusion with autograft either with or without pedicle-screw instrumentation. Additional graft was harvested for osteoblastlike cell culture. Cells were counted after 3 weeks, and their proliferative capacity was correlated to fusion rate and fusion amount.

RESULTS

Cell count was significantly higher in the fused animals (p<.011). Furthermore, a tendency toward a positive correlation to fusion mass amount was observed (p<.091).

CONCLUSIONS

The achievement of a solid spinal fusion using autograft is related to properties of the bone-forming cells in the graft and fusion bed. Most likely it is the number of cells and not their proliferative capacity that is the most important factor.

Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the long-term effect of supplementary transpedicular screw fixation on reoperation rate and functional outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Within the past few years the benefit of supplemental pedicle screw fixation has been questioned as a standard procedure in lumbar spinal fusion surgery. The long-term effect of supplemental pedicle screw fixation is still unknown.

METHODS

From 1992 through 1994 a total of 129 patients with severe chronic low back pain were randomly selected for either supplemental pedicle screw fixation (instrumented) or no pedicle screw instrumentation (noninstrumented) posterolateral spinal fusion. The Dallas Pain Questionnaire, Low Back Pain Rating Scale, and a questionnaire concerning work status assessed the outcome.

RESULTS

A 5-year follow-up of 93% showed that the instrumented group had a 25% reoperation rate (removal of instrumentation with and without second fusion) compared with a reoperation rate of 14% in the noninstrumented group (fusion and decompression) (P < 0.03). A total of 51% were capable of working after 5 years compared with 40% before surgery. There was no difference in work capacity between the two groups at any point of observation. Overall, there was no significant difference between the instrumented and noninstrumented groups in regard to functional outcome as measured by both the Dallas Pain Questionnaire and Low Back Pain Rating Scale. When analyzing diagnostic subgroups at the 5-year follow-up, patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis had a significantly better outcome by use of a posterolateral fusion without supplemental instrumentation compared with an instrumented fusion (P < 0.03). However, patients with primary degenerative instability improved significantly more when instrumentation supported the posterolateral spinal fusions (P < 0.02). To the question "was it worth it?" 67% answered "yes" in the instrumented group whereas 70% did so in the noninstrumented groups (not significant).

CONCLUSION

The long-term functional outcome of posterolateral spinal fusion improved significantly for boththose with and without pedicle screw instrumentation, with a global 70% satisfaction reported by the patients. Patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2 with noninstrumented fusion had superior long-term outcomes after posterolateral spinal fusion in comparison with an instrumented fusion. In contrast, patients diagnosed as having primary degenerative instability improved significantly when the posterolateral fusion was supported by instrumentation. In actuality, pedicle screw instrumentation increased reoperation rate compared with noninstrumented posterolateral fusion.

The influence of lumbar lordosis on spinal fusion and functional outcome after posterolateral spinal fusion with and without pedicle screw instrumentation

The aim of the current study was to examine the correlation between lumbar lordosis, spinal fusion, and functional outcome in patients suffering from severe low back pain, treated by posterolateral spinal fusion with or without pedicle screw instrumentation. One hundred thirty patients were randomly allocated to posterolateral lumbar fusion with or without Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Functional outcome was assessed preoperatively, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Lordosis angles of the lumbar spine and fusion rates were assessed at the 1- and 2-year follow-up. No difference in lordosis angle was found between the two groups at any time. Lordosis was unchanged at 2 years compared with preoperative status in both groups. In the instrumented group, nonunion (23%) was followed by a decrease in lordosis at follow-up (p < 0.05). However, in the noninstrumented group, nonunion (14%) resulted in increased lordosis (p < 0.05). No correlation was found between functional outcome and lordosis angle. The current study showed no correlation between functional outcome and lordosis angle either before or after posterolateral spinal fusion. Use of instrumentation did not influence lumbar spinal alignment compared with noninstrumented fusions. The sagittal alignment was stable both 1 and 2 years after solid fusion. The failure mode of instrumented fusions was a reduced degree of lordosis in contrast to an increased degree of lordosis in patients with noninstrumented fusion.

Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spinal fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A review of the smoking habits in 426 patients who had been followed prospectively for 2 years after a lumbar spinal fusion procedure was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of pre- and postoperative smoking on clinical and functional outcome after lumbar spinal fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several animal models have shown a negative effect of nicotine on spinal fusion. At this writing, the clinical effect of nicotine on spinal fusion has not been fully clarified.

METHODS

The study comprised 426 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion between 1993 and 1997. These patients received a mailed questionnaire regarding their tobacco consumption before and after their surgery. All other data, including preoperative clinical and functional status, were collected prospectively during a 2-year follow-up period. To assess functional outcome, the Dallas Pain Questionnaire was used.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was answered by 396 patients (93%). Of these patients, 54.5% (20% more than the background population) were smokers before the operation. Smoking of more than 10 cigarettes daily before the operation and attempted fusion at two or more levels increased the risk of nonunion: odds ratio, 2.01 (P < 0.016) and odds ratio, 3.03 (P < 0.001), respectively. Smoking cessation increased fusion rates to near those of nonsmokers. Smoking had no influence on functional outcome, as assessed by the Dallas Pain Questionnaire, but preoperative smoking predicted a negative answer to the question "Would you undergo the same treatment again, now that you know the result?" (odds ratio, 1.65; P < 0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking was shown to have a negative effect on fusion and overall patient satisfaction, but no measurable influence on the functional outcome as assessed by the Dallas Pain Questionnaire.

Postmodernism in marriage and family therapy training: doctoral students' understanding and experiences

The purpose of this study is to advance our understanding of how doctoral students perceive postmodernism's influence in the field of Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). According to the literature, postmodernism has had a profound impact on many fields, including MFT. However, tracking of how postmodernism is actually being rendered in theory, research, practice, and training warrants investigation. This study utilized focus group interviews to investigate the perceptions of MFT doctoral students. Findings suggest that while participants are attracted to postmodern tenets, they also report feeling a mixture of liberation and excitement with confusion and fear regarding how postmodernism is influencing MFT models of therapy.

Posterolateral spinal fusion at unintended levels due to bone-graft migration: no effect on clinical outcome in 19/130 patients

In a prospective randomized study, we evaluated the risk of lumbar posterolateral spinal fusion at an unintended level due to bone graft migration. 130 patients underwent fusion supplemented by pedicle screw fixation (Cotrell-Dubousset, 64 patients) or uninstrumented fusion (66 patients). This was assessed by two independent observers on antero-posterior, and lateral radiographs taken 1 year after surgery. All patients had ben operated on at the preoperatively planned levels. Both observers agreed that fusion had taken place at an unintended level in 19 cases (14%). We found a tendency towards a higher risk of this "complication" when using supplementary pedicle screw fixation. The functional outcome, assessed by the Dallas Pain Questionnaire and the Low Back Pain Rating scale, was similar in patients having fusion at an unintended level and in patients fused only at the intended levels. There was no difference between the two groups concerning reoperation rates, postoperative smoking or social status. We conclude that unintended fusion occurs and tends to be commoner with the use of pedicle screw instrumentation. However, this complication seems not to affect the functional outcome if fusion has taken place at the intended level.

Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of radiograph interpretation with and without pedicle screw implants: the need for a detailed classification system in posterolateral spinal fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized clinical study in which four observers evaluated radiographs of posterolateral fusion masses.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of radiograph interpretation of the posterolateral spinal fusion mass when using a detailed classification system and to analyze the influence of metallic internal fixation devices on radiologic inaccuracy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In general, the literature describing the classification criteria used for radiograph interpretation of spinal posterolateral fusion has serious deficiencies. There is a need for a detailed classification system.

METHODS

Seventy patients were randomly allocated to receive no instrumentation (n = 36) or Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation (n = 34) in posterolateral lumbar fusion. All four observers participated in a prestudy discussion and evaluated the radiographs (anteroposterior, lateral) taken at the 1-year follow-up evaluation. The observers scored the radiographs twice (30 days apart). Each level on each side was judged separately. A continuous intertransverse bony bridge involving at minimum one of the two sides indicated a fusion at that level. "Fusion" indicated this quality of fusion at all intended levels. If the fusion was doubtful on both sides of the interspace, the individual case could not be classified as "fused."

RESULTS

The mean interobserver agreement was 86% (Kappa 0.53), and the mean intraobserver agreement was 93% (Kappa 0.78). No difference in interobserver and intraobserver agreement was found between patients with and without supplementary pedicle screw fixation. All mean Kappa values were classified as fair or good. The four observers identified a mean fusion rate of 81%.

CONCLUSION

It is extremely difficult to interpret radiographic lumbar posterolateral fusion success. Such an assessment needs to be performed by use of a detailed radiographic classification system. The classification system presented here revealed good interobserver and intraobserver agreement, both with and without instrumentation. The classification showed acceptable reliability and may be one way to improve interstudy and intrastudy correlation of radiologic outcomes after posterolateral spinal fusion. Instrumentation did not influence reproducibility but may result in slightly underestimated fusion rates.

Recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-7 as an intracorporal bone growth stimulator in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures in humans: preliminary results

The study presented here is a pilot study in five patients with unstable thoracolumbar spine fractures treated with transpedicular OP-1 transplantation, short segment instrumentation and posterolateral fusion. Recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-7 in combination with a collagen carrier, also referred to as OP-1, has demonstrated ability to induce healing in long-bone segmental defects in dogs, rabbits and monkeys and to induce successful posterolateral spinal fusion in dogs without need for autogenous bone graft. Furthermore OP-1 has been demonstrated to be effective as a bone graft substitute when performing the PLIF maneuver in a sheep model. Five patients with single-level unstable burst fracture and no neurological impairment were treated with intracorporal OP-1 transplantation, posterior fixation (USS) and posterolateral fusion. One patient with osteomalacia and an L2 burst fracture had an additional intracorporal transplantation performed proximal to the instrumented segment, i.e. OP-1 into T 12 and autogenous bone into T 11. Follow-up time was 12-18 months. On serial radiographs, Cobb and kyphotic angles, as well as anterior, middle and posterior column heights, were measured. Serial CT scans were performed to determine the bone mineral density at fracture level. In one case, radiographic and CT evaluation after 3 and 6 months showed severe resorption at the site of transplantation, but after 12 months, new bone had started to fill in at the area of resorption. In all cases there was loss of correction with regard to anterior and middle column height and sagittal balance at the latest follow-up. These preliminary results regarding OP-1 as a bone graft substitute and stimulator of new bone formation have been disappointing, as the OP-1 device in this study was not capable of inducing an early sufficient structural bone support. There are indications to suggest that OP-1 application to a fracture site in humans might result in detrimental enhanced bone resorption as a primary event.

Mechanical and histological analysis of bone-pedicle screw interface in vivo: titanium versus stainless steel

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the differences in bone interface between titanium and stainless steel pedicle screws in the lumbar spine.

METHODS

Eighteen adult mini-pigs that underwent total laminectomy, posterolateral spinal fusion (L4-L5) were randomly selected to receive stainless steel (9) or titanium pedicle screw devices (9). In both groups, the devices were CCD (Sofamore Danek) type with the same size and shape. The postoperative observation time was 3 months. Screws from L4 were harvested along their long axis of pedicle for histomorphometric study. Bone-screw interface and bone volume from thread were examined using linear intercept techniques. Mechanical testing (torsional test and pull-out test) was performed on the screws from L5.

RESULTS

The titanium screw group had a significantly higher maximum torque (P < 0.05) and angle related stiffness (P < 0.05) measured by torsional test. In the pull-out tests, no differences were found between the two groups in relation to the maximum load, stiffness and energy to failure. Direct bone contact with the screw in percentage was 29.4% for stainless steel and 43.8% for titanium (P < 0.05). No differences in the bone purchase between the vertebral body part and pedicle part were found.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle screws made of titanium have a better bone-screw interface binding than screws made of stainless steel. Torsional tests are more informative for bone-screw interface study. Pull-out tests seem less valuable when comparing bone purchase of screws made from different materials.

[The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on posterolateral spinal fusion. A prospective, randomized study with a two-year follow-up]

The aim was to evaluate the effect of supplementary pedicle screw fixation (Cotrel-Dubousset [CD]) in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. The study comprises 130 patients undergoing lumbar or lumbosacral fusion for spondyloisthesis grades I-II or degenerative segmental instability conditions. The patients were randomly allocated for no instrumentation (n = 66) or CD instrumentation (n = 64) in posterolateral lumbar fusion. A 97.7% follow-up was achieved. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning fusion rates assessed by X-ray or functional outcomes assessed by Dallas Pain Questionnaire. The global patient satisfaction was 82% in the instrumented group versus 74% in the noninstrumented group. Instrumentation increased both operation time, blood loss, and early re-operation rates significantly. A high patient satisfaction was found in both groups. However, the results from this study do not justify the general use of pedicle screw fixation alone as an adjunct to posterolateral lumbar fusion.

[Results after surgical treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures]

Seventy-eight patients with unstable, one-level fracture of the thoracolumbar spine and no neurological impairment were treated with short segment fixation, transpedicular autologous bone transplantation and posterolateral fusion. Kyphotic deformity and anterior column height improved significantly. Complications consisted of one case of late deep infection, three cases of seroma, four cases with 5 mm schantz screw breakage and two cases with screw loosening. Mild to moderate pain was present in 79% of the patients at follow-up, median 32 (13-72) months. Sixty-seven percent of the patients had returned to previous activity levels of employment. Short posterior internal fixation, transpedicular transplantation and posterolateral fusion allowed neurologically intact patients to be mobilized early, to spend median 12 days in hospital, and carried no risk of deterioration in neurological function.

Can autologous bone culture predict spinal fusion capacity?

The capacity of the individual patient to initiate osteoblast proliferation as a predictor for successful lumbar spinal fusion has not yet been reported. The objectives of this study were, first, to analyze the relationship between in vitro osteoblast proliferation and clinical bony fusion in the individual patient in order to predict the fusion outcome and, second, to measure the effect of preoperative tobacco smoking on osteoblast proliferation. Sixty-one patients (mean age 46 years) underwent posterolateral lumbar fusion in the period 1994-1995. Thirty-eight patients received CD pedicle screw implants and 23 received posterolateral fusions alone. During surgery, autogenous iliac bone was harvested and 1 g of trabecular bone without blood or bone marrow was then isolated for cell culturing. The cultures were classified as excellent (confluence within 4 weeks), good (confluence between 4 and 6 weeks) and poor (no or poor growth). Spine fusion was evaluated by two independent observers from plain anterior-posterior, lateral, and flexion/extension radiographs taken 1 year postoperatively, and the functional outcome was measured by the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ). Twenty-three patients had excellent, 19 good, and 19 poor in vitro osteoblast proliferation. Bony fusion was obtained in 77% of patients: 83% in the CD instrumentation group and 70% in the non-instrumentation group (NS). There was no significant correlation between osteoblast proliferation and spinal fusion or functional outcomes when analyzing the CD instrumentation and non-instrumentation groups together or separately. Elderly patients had a significantly poorer osteoblast proliferation than younger patients (P < 0.008). Preoperative tobacco consumption had no discernible effect on osteoblast proliferation, and no correlation between smoking and fusion was found. Further refinement of autologous osteoblast culturing may provide a biological tool for selection of patients who require biological enhancement of their bone fusion capacity. The poorer osteoblast proliferation related to advanced age supports the important negative biological influence of age on bony fusion. However, with more sensitive testing and better discrimination, other results are possible - or can in any event not be excluded.

Functional outcome after posterolateral spinal fusion using pedicle screws: comparison between primary and salvage procedure

Lumbar spinal fusion is a commonly performed surgical procedure, yet both the indications for its performance and its results remain controversial. It is generally believed that apart from situations where obvious measurable instability exists, a repeat surgical procedure such as spinal fusion does not improve the functional outcome in more than an average of 50% of cases. The aim of this study was to analyse functional outcome after posterolateral lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion, comparing primary and salvage procedures. It was designed as a prospective case/referent study with a 2-year follow-up. A total of 39 patients underwent a short posterior fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) pedicle screw fixation after earlier surgery of the lumbar spine. Two patients were erroneously omitted from the study at the index, so 37 patients were included in the salvage group. In the same period, 69 patients underwent lumbar fusion with pedicle screw fixation (CD) as primary surgery (referent group). Functional outcome was assessed by means of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire preoperatively and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Fusion rates were determined by ordinary X-ray evaluation by two independent observers. Patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery had a significant improvement in functional outcome in terms of daily activity, work and leisure-time activities and anxiety/depression. With regard to social functioning, a significantly inferior outcome was found after the salvage procedure. The return-to-work rates at 2 years after surgery were 50% in the salvage group and 53% in the referent group. There was a significant correlation between radiological evaluation of the fusion mass and the functional outcome. The fusion rate was 76% in the salvage group and 72% in the referent group. This study demonstrates that a posterolateral spinal fusion can be effectively used as a salvage procedure. The functional and radiological outcome of the patients with revision surgery did not differ from those of the group of patients who underwent primary surgery. There was, however a clear indication of inferior social functioning after revision surgery.

1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized clinical study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate supplementary pedicle screw fixation (Cotrel-Dubousset) in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The rationale behind lumbar fusion is to eliminate pathologic motion to relieve pain. To improve fusion rates and to allow reduction, a rigid transpedicular screw fixation may be beneficial, but the positive effect of this may be counter-balanced by an increase in complications.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were severe, chronic low back pain from spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2 or from primary or secondary degenerative segmental instability. One hundred thirty patients were randomly allocated to receive no instrumentation (n = 66) or Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation (n = 64) in posterolateral lumbar fusion. Variables were registered at the time of surgery and at 1 and 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Follow-up was achieved in 97.7% of the patients. Fusion rates deduced from plain radiographs were not significantly different between instrumented and noninstrumented groups. The functional outcome assessed by the Dallas Pain Questionnaire improved significantly in both groups, and there were no significant differences in results between the two groups, except for significantly better (P < 0.06) functional outcome in relation to daily activities in the instrumented group when neural decompression had been performed. The global patients' satisfaction was 82% in the instrumented group versus 74% in the noninstrumented group (not significant). Fixation of instrumentation increased operation time, blood loss, and early reoperation rate significantly. Patients experienced only a few minor postoperative complications; none were major. Two infections appeared in the Cotrel-Dubousset group. Significant symptoms from misplacement of pedicle screws were seen in 4.8% of the instrumented patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar posterolateral fusion with pedicle screw fixation increases the operation time, blood loss, and reoperation rate, and leads to a significant risk of nerve injury. The functional outcome improves significantly with high patient satisfaction, with or without instrumentation. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in functional outcome and fusion rate. The only gain in functional outcome from instrumentation was found in the daily activity category in patients with supplementary neural decompression. The results of this study do not justify the general use of pedicle screw fixation alone as an adjunct to posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Retrograde ejaculation after retroperitoneal lower lumbar interbody fusion

We have studied the incidence and functional outcome of retrograde ejaculation as a postoperative complication of anterior lumbar interbody fusion. A questionnaire, specifically designed to analyse this problem, has been used over a 6 to 13 year follow-up. Out of 50 men, 41 completed the questionnaire; 2 complained they had permanent retrograde ejaculation after the operation; one stopped ejaculating for 6 months, and thereafter had a 50% reduction. The Dallas pain questionnaire showed that retrograde ejaculation did not have a negative effect on the functional outcome, but male genital dysfunction was a complication of anterior spinal fusion in 8% of cases.

Radiological and functional outcome after anterior lumbar interbody spinal fusion

Outcome after anterior spinal fusion has mainly been studied radiologically and reported fusion rates vary greatly. The aim of this study was to investigate radiological and long-term clinical outcome. The study comprised 120 consecutive patients, operated on during the period 1979-1987, with single-or two-level anterior interbody spinal fusion due to disc degeneration or isthmic spondylolisthesis with lumbar instability. In 64 patients a supplemental facet joint fusion was performed. Clinical outcome was evaluated 5-13 years after surgery using the patient-administered Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ). Radiological outcome was determined on the basis of radiographs taken at a 2-year follow-up assessed by independent observers. The radiological follow-up rate was 98%. Complete fusion was found in 52%, questionable fusion in 24%, and definitive pseudoarthrosis in 24% of patients. Radiological results were poor in patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery (P < 0.05) and in those with two-level fusion (P < 0.05). The DPQ reply rate was 80%. Sixty-six patients claimed improvement in all functional groups. Patients with complete or questionable union had significantly better results than did those with non-union (P < 0.01). Poorer functional outcome was found in patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery (P < 0.01) or fusion at the L4/L5 level (P < 0.05), in those who had responded poorly to the preoperative test brace (P < 0.05), and in those above 45 years old at the time of surgery (P < 0.05). Radiological and functional outcome did not vary according to whether patients were treated postoperatively with a plaster jacket or with facet screw fixation. The study demonstrated a functional success rate of approximately 66% following anterior lumbar spinal fusion after a mean follow-up of 8 years. There was a clear tendency for poorer prognosis for patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery, those aged above 45 years, those operated at the L4/L5 level and those who had responded poorly to the preoperative test brace. DPQ scores correlated well with radiological outcome.

[Anterior lumbar intercorporal spondylodesis. Radiological and functional therapeutic results]

The purpose of this investigation was to identify risk factors in relation to non-union following lumbar intercorporal spondylodesis and to correlate this result with the functional outcome as assessed by the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ). This comprises questions concerning daily activities, work-leisure activities, anxiety-depression and social interest, measured on visual analog scales. During the period 1979-87 a total of 132 patients were operated with spondylodesis, diagnosed as suffering from spondylolisthesis or disc degeneration. Minimal follow-up was one year. Radiological graft incorporation was complete in 52% of the cases, partial in 24% and lacking in 24%. The rate of functional outcome follow-up was 72%. Seventy percent claimed an improvement in three out of four categories. Thirty percent claimed no improvement or worsened condition. The DPQ showed signs of poor prognosis for age groups above 45 (p < 0.04) and those with former spine surgery (p < 0.02). The questionnaire showed significantly better results for the group with perfect or doubtful union compared to the group with non-union (p < 0.006). In conclusion this investigation demonstrates a success rate of 70% for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. There is a tendency to poorer prognosis for patients with previous spine surgery and age above 45 years. The Dallas Pain Questionnaire correlates significantly to X-ray analysis and seems to be a useful tool for the description of individual biopsychosocial changes following spine surgery.

Intramuscular imipenem/cilastatin treatment of upper reproductive tract infection in women: efficacy and use characteristics

We evaluated the efficacy, patient and medical staff acceptance, and costs of intramuscular therapy with imipenem/cilastatin for mild to moderate upper reproductive tract infection in hospitalized women in an open study. Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 29 successfully completed the protocol. Of these, 90% were satisfactorily treated with imipenem/cilastatin given intramuscularly. Twenty-eight of 29 subjects tolerated the intramuscular injections well, although 7 women noted mild to moderate discomfort during injection. All patients who had previously received intravenous therapy (24/29) stated that they preferred the intramuscular injections to continuation or reinitiation of intravenous treatment. Therapy with intramuscular imipenem/cilastatin (assuming a marketed price per gram of approximately $30) was associated with cost savings in comparison with other regimens offering similar antibacterial coverage. Initial care provider resistance to treatment with intramuscular imipenem/cilastatin was overcome due to patient satisfaction. Intramuscularly administered imipenem/cilastatin was effective, generally well tolerated, and resulted in cost saving. Intramuscular administration of imipenem/cilastatin may be a preferred antibiotic treatment in patients with mild to moderate infection due to susceptible microorganisms.

A comparison of ampicillin plus sulbactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin for treatment of postpartum infection

Thirty-six hospitalized patients, 18 in each of two groups, with postpartum upper genital tract infection were enrolled in a randomized, prospective study comparing treatment with sulbactam/ampicillin, to treatment with clindamycin/gentamicin. One (5.5%) clinical failure was reported in each group. Side effects were minimal in both groups and did not warrant discontinuation of treatment. The in vitro activity of ampicillin versus sulbactam/ampicillin (1:2) was evaluated and these data were compared with data from other drugs commonly used for aerobic and anaerobic infections. Sulbactam eliminated resistance to ampicillin in all anaerobic and most aerobic isolates.