The SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and Cancer Trials Ireland: Impact, Resolution and Legacy

BACKGROUND

Cancer Trials Ireland (CTI) is the national cooperative group in Ireland. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to significant ongoing disruptive change in healthcare from March 2020 to the present day. Its impact and legacy on a national clinical trials organisation was assessed.

METHODS

A review was conducted of prospectively acquired communications, team logs and time sheets, trial activation, closure and accrual, for the period 2019 to September 2021. An online survey of the impact of the pandemic on clinical investigators and of clinical trials units was performed. A National Cancer Retreat was organised on 21 May 2021 to identify and address pandemic related disruption and develop adaptive strategies.

RESULTS

In the weeks after the pandemic was declared, remote working was initiated by all central office staff. Nationally, clinical trial accrual fell by 54% compared to the same period in 2019, radiotherapy trial accrual by 90%, and translational studies by 36%. Staff reassignment of research nurse staff occurred in 60% of units, trial monitoring was reduced in 42%, and trial initiations fell by 67%. Extreme fluctuations in monitoring hours were noted paralleling lockdown measures. Significant impact on all clinical trials units was noted including staff reassignments, reduced access to diagnostic imaging and reduced institutional supports. Remote clinic visits and remote monitoring was widely adopted. The National Cancer Retreat identified flexibility in trial conduct, staff recruitment and retention, the need for harmonisation of processes, and research staff support in the context of remote working as priorities.

CONCLUSION

The pandemic has had a significant ongoing negative impact on cancer clinical trial activity in Ireland. Adaptive strategies including trial flexibility, expanded telehealth and remote monitoring, harmonisation of processes and staff support have been identified as priorities to ameliorate this impact, and develop a more sustainable clinical trial ecosystem.

Re-evaluation of the penicillamine challenge test in the diagnosis of Wilson's disease in children

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

A urinary copper (Cu) >25 micromol/24 h following penicillamine had a reported specificity of 98.2% and sensitivity of 88.2% in diagnosing Wilson's disease (WD). We have re-evaluated this test. Ninety-eight subjects were studied at presentation.

METHODS

Thirty-eight (19 girls, 19 boys; median age 10.3 years; range 5-16 years) had an ultimate diagnosis of WD. Sixty (24 girls, 36 boys; median age 10.1, range 2.3-15 years) had other liver disorders. Urinary Cu was estimated for 24h before (basal Cu) and for 24h whilst giving penicillamine 500 mg orally 12 hourly x 2 (post-penicillamine Cu).

RESULTS

Both basal Cu and post-penicillamine Cu differed significantly between WD patients and controls (basal Cu: median 6.5 micromol/24 h, range 0.9-109 micromol/24 h, versus median: 0.8 micromol/24 h, range 0.1-19.5, p<0.0001; post-penicillamine Cu: median 36.9 micromol/24 h, range 1.98-219 micromol/24 h, versus median 12.35 micromol/24 h, range 0.5-49.8 micromol/24 h, p<0.0001). A post-penicillamine Cu >25 micromol/24 h was observed in 29/38 patients with WD and in 4/60 controls. 25/38 WD patients were symptomatic. Twenty-three of these and 6/13 asymptomatic siblings had a positive test. The test had a sensitivity of 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.8-88.6%) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI, 83.8-98.2%). Sensitivity was better in symptomatic patients (92%, [95% CI; 74-99%]) than asymptomatic (46%, [95% CI; 19.2-74.9%]).

CONCLUSIONS

This test is valuable in the diagnosis of WD with active liver disease, but is unreliable to exclude the diagnosis in asymptomatic siblings.