Does microplastic analysis method affect our understanding of microplastics in the environment?

Two analytical methods - both in active use at different laboratories - were tested and compared against each other to investigate how the procedure influences microplastic (MP) detection with micro Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μFTIR) imaging. A representative composite water sample collected from the Danube River was divided into 12 subsamples, and processed following two different methods, which differed in MP isolation procedures, the optical substrate utilized for the chemical imaging, and the detection limit of the spectroscopic instruments. The first instrument had a nominal pixel resolution of 5.5 μm, while the second had a nominal resolution of 25 μm. These two methods led to different MP abundance, MP mass estimates, but not MP characteristics. Only looking at MPs > 50 μm, the first method showed a higher MP abundance, namely 418-2571 MP m-3 with MP mass estimates of 703-1900 μg m-3, while the second method yielded 16.7-72.1 MP m-3 with mass estimates of 222-439 μg m-3. Looking deeper into the steps of the methods showed that the MP isolation procedure contributed slightly to the difference in the result. However, the variability between individual samples was larger than the difference caused by the methods. Somewhat sample-dependent, the use of two different substrates (zinc selenide windows versus Anodisc filters) caused a substantial difference between results. This was due to a higher tendency for particles to agglomerate on the Anodisc filters, and an 'IR-halo' around particles on ZnSe windows when scanning with μFTIR. Finally, the μFTIR settings and nominal resolution caused significant differences in identifying MP size and mass estimate, which showed that the smaller the pixel size, the more accurately the particle boundary can be defined. These findings contributed to explaining disagreements between studies and addressed the importance of harmonization of methods.

Presence, variation, and potential ecological impact of microplastics in the largest shallow lake of Central Europe

The presence of microplastics (MPs) in the global ecosystem has generated a rapidly growing concern worldwide. Although their presence in the marine environment has been well-studied, much less data are available on their abundance in freshwaters. MPs alone and in combination with different chemicals has been shown to cause acute and chronic effects on algae and aquatic invertebrate and vertebrate species at different biological levels. However, the combined ecotoxicological effects of MPs with different chemicals on aquatic organisms are still understudied in many species and the reported data are often controversial. In the present study, we investigated, for the first time, the presence of MPs in Lake Balaton, which is the largest shallow lake of Central Europe and an important summer holiday destination. Moreover, we exposed neonates of the well-established ecotoxicological model organism Daphnia magna to different MPs (polystyrene [3 μm] or polyethylene [≤ 100 μm]) alone and in combination with three progestogen compounds (progesterone, drospirenone, levonorgestrel) at an environmentally relevant concentration (10 ng L^-1) for 21 days. The presence of 7 polymer types of MPs in the size range of 50-100 μm was detected in Lake Balaton. Similarly to the global trends, polypropylene and polyethylene MPs were the most common types of polymer. The calculated polymer-independent average particle number was 5.5 particles m^-3 (size range: 50 μm - 100 μm) which represents the values detected in other European lakes. Our ecotoxicological experiments confirmed that MPs and progestogens can affect D. magna at the behavioral (body size and reproduction) and biochemical (detoxification-related enzyme activity) levels. The joint effects were negligible. The presence of MPs may lead to reduced fitness in the aquatic biota in freshwaters such as Lake Balaton, however, the potential threat of MPs as vectors for progestogens may be limited.

Validation of microplastic sample preparation method for freshwater samples

The global presence of microplastics in the environment is well documented nowadays. Studies already showed the potential risks that microplastic particles might cause to the ecosystem, while potential human health effects are currently under investigation. As one of the main inputs of these crucial researches, the concentration of microplastics in the environment should be measured precisely, confidently and monitored regularly to determine exposure levels of these pollutants. Some study highlights, that the results are usually inconsistent and uncertain, due to different sampling and sample preparation methods and the lack of quality assurance and quality control of these processes. The need for a standardized methodology is an emerging issue, as this would provide the right tools to establish a global monitoring system of microplastics. Validated sample preparation methods of water (especially freshwater) samples for microplastic analysis are rarely described. To fulfil the gap, this study aims to create and validate a special toolset and the related standard operating procedure for enhanced sample preparation. A newly developed equipment, the Small Volume Glass Separator was designed to easily isolate microplastics from freshwater samples and concentrate the treated sample in a small volume, thus reducing the brine solution use and the sample transfer steps. These features enable better prevention of contamination and making sample preparation easy, fast and cost-effective. The Small Volume Glass Separator and the related standard operation procedure was validated on model freshwater and wastewater samples with the use of fluorescently tagged microplastics and environmentally relevant microplastics (fragments, fibres). Recoveries were measured with optical microscopy under UV light and with near-infrared spectroscopy/microscopy. Recovery tests with fluorescently tagged microspheres showed that average recovery with the Small Volume Glass Separator is 12-39% higher than that of a widespread sample preparation method. This procedure was also able to recover on average 64%±29% of all the environmentally relevant particles during the validation process. Results show that size and density have a great influence on potential particle loss. Recovery of smaller particles are less with both methods than that of the larger particles, but Small Volume Glass Separator yielded significantly higher recovery for more dense particles. The results of this study help to better understand particle loss during sample preparation and thus contribute to the establishment of standardised microplastic analysis processes.

Validation of pressurized fractionated filtration microplastic sampling in controlled test environment

In the field of microplastic (MP) research in the environment, a significant amount of the currently reported results is uncertain because of the inappropriate methods of sampling, detection and quantification of MPs. Fortunately, many research groups are aware of these challenges, but validated methods, which are the prerequisite of standardized measurements, are scarce. Recovery tests are especially rare in the field of MP sampling. The aim of our research was to take a step forward and collect data on cascade filtration recoveries by modeling different turbulance conditions and sampling depth applying environmentally relevant MP concentrations while obtaining large sample volumes. As reference materials, different polymer types (polyethylene - PE; polypropylene - PP; poly[ethylene terephthalate] - PET; poly[vinyl chloride] - PVC; polyamide - PA) and shapes (sphere, fragment, fiber) were used, and for detection near-infrared spectroscopy/microscopy was applied. The developed method provides information not only on system based MP losses, but on sampling efficiency in a model environment as well. Based on the results, the highest recovery rate of all polymers was 31.4% on average, sampled from the water surface during continuous stirring. In these conditions, 92.4% of the PE spheres and 31.9% of the PE fragments were recovered. This indicates, particles reported in environmental monitoring studies might be less than the real environmental concentration. We can conclude, that surface sampling is more efficient than sampling in a deeper layer of the water column. Our research revealed, that the widespread application of microspheres as reference materials might lead to too optimistic recovery values. The application of reference particles (fragments, fibers) with higher environmental relevance shows much lower recovery rates. Our results highlight, that validating the efficiency of the whole sampling process from the environment is more important than measuring only the filtration device's recovery. This study helps us to better understand the relationship and the possible gaps between the reported MP results and the real-life concentrations in the environment.

Identification of microplastics in fish ponds and natural freshwater environments of the Carpathian basin, Europe

In the past few years, there has been a significant development in freshwater microplastic research. Pollution has been detected in lakes and rivers of several continents, but the number of papers is still marginal compared to the ones investigating marine environments. In this study, we present the first detection of microplastics (MPs) in Central and Eastern European (CEE) surface waters and, globally, the first detection in fish ponds. Samples were taken from different types of fish ponds and natural water bodies along a novel concept down to a particle size of 100 μm, then, after sample preparation, MPs were characterized using an FTIR microscope. 92% of the water samples contained MPs ranging from 3.52 to 32.05 particles/m³. MPs were detected in 69% of the sediment samples ranging from 0.46 to 1.62 particles/kg. Dominant abundance of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene was shown in water and PP and polystyrene in sediment samples. First results also indicate that fish ponds may act as a deposition area for MPs.