Corneal macrophage infiltrates following ocular herpes simplex virus type 1 challenge vary in BALB/c mice vaccinated with different vaccines

Macrophage cell infiltrates in the cornea were examined following ocular herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) challenge of vaccinated BALB/c mice. Mice were vaccinated with individual HSV-1 glycoproteins, cocktails of different HSV-1 glycoproteins, or live avirulent HSV-1 (strain KOS). Cryostat sections of cornea were taken at different times after challenge and reacted with M1/70, F4/80, BM8, or MOMA-1 monoclonal antibodies. The pattern of macrophage responses in the cornea differed depending on the vaccine that was given prior to HSV-1 ocular challenge. No macrophage response was detected in mice vaccinated with the highly protective 5gPs consisting of the five glycoproteins gB, gC, gD, gE, and gI. In contrast, mock vaccinated mice and mice vaccinated with gK, which is known to exacerbate HSV-1 induced eye disease, had high sustained macrophage responses. Mice vaccinated with 7gPs (5gPs+gG and gH) had moderate levels of macrophages. It appeared that (1) the most effective vaccines induced no detectable infiltrating macrophages in the eyes, while the least efficacious vaccines had very high levels of infiltrating macrophages; (2) presence of CD11b(+) cells in the cornea appeared to correlate with enhanced blepharitis, but did not appear to affect corneal scarring; and (3) presence of F4/80(+) cells in the cornea tended to correlate with increased corneal scarring.

Perforin pathway is essential for protection of mice against lethal ocular HSV-1 challenge but not corneal scarring

Perforin (cytolysin; pore-forming protein) is expressed in both CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells, and is a major factor responsible for the cytolytic activities of these cells. Both CD8(+) T-cells and NK cells are important in eliminating cells infected with certain viruses. We examined the role of perforin in a mouse model of HSV-1 infection using perforin-deficient mice. Naïve perforin knockout (perforin(0/0)) mice were more susceptible to lethal HSV-1 ocular challenge (60% survival), than naïve parental C57BL/6 (100% survival). In contrast, both C57BL/6 and perforin(0/0) mice had similar levels of HSV-1 induced corneal scarring. Vaccination of perforin(0/0) mice induced a significantly higher HSV-1 neutralizing antibody titer than vaccination of C57BL/6 mice, and the mice were completely protected against lethal ocular challenge. These results suggest that in naïve mice ocularly challenged with HSV-1, the perforin pathway was involved in protection against death, but not in protection against corneal scarring.

Either a CD4(+)or CD8(+)T cell function is sufficient for clearance of infectious virus from trigeminal ganglia and establishment of herpes simplex virus type 1 latency in mice

Following ocular infection of normal mice, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) establishes a latent infection in the trigeminal ganglia (TG) with the complete absence of detectable infectious virus. In this study, the role of CD4(+)and CD8(+)T cell dependent immune responses is examined in relation to clearing infectious virus from the TG following HSV-1 ocular challenge. Nude mice, which lack T cells, and MHC(o/o)mice, which lack both MHC class I and MHC class II, were challenged ocularly with wild-type HSV-1. Over 70% of the TG from mice surviving the infection contained infectious virus, indicative of a chronic infection in these TG, rather than a latent infection. No infectious virus was detected in TGs from infected C57BL/6 parental mice. Ocular challenge of CD4(o/o)A(beta(o/o, CD8(o/o)or beta(2)m(o/o)mice resulted in latent rather than chronic infection. Similarly, when C57BL/6 mice were depleted for CD4(+)or CD8(+)T cells from 4 days before ocular challenge to 26 days after ocular challenge, no free virus was detected in TGs of challenged mice. In contrast, when mice were depleted of both their CD4(+)and CD8(+)T cells, over 90% of TGs were positive for free virus, suggesting that the lack of virus clearance was due to the combined lack of both CD4(+)T cells and CD8(+)T cells (i.e. in the presence of either CD4(+)T cells or CD8(+)T cells alone all of the infectious virus was cleared and latency was established).))