Deterioration in quality of life (QoL) in patients with malignant ascites: results from a phase II/III study comparing paracentesis plus catumaxomab with paracentesis alone

BACKGROUND

Malignant ascites (MA) is associated with poor prognosis and limited palliative therapeutic options. Therefore, quality of life (QoL) assessment is of particular importance to demonstrate new treatment value. Following the demonstration of the superiority of catumaxomab and paracentesis over paracentesis on puncture-free survival, this analysis aimed at comparing deterioration in QoL between both the treatment options.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a randomised, multicentre, phase II/III study of patients with MA due to epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) positive cancer, the QoL was evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at screening, 1, 3 and 7 months after treatment and in the case of re-puncture on the day of paracentesis. Time to first deterioration in QoL was defined as a decrease in the QoL score of at least five points and compared between the catumaxomab (n=160) and control (n=85) groups using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline score, country and primary tumour type.

RESULTS

Deterioration in QoL scores appeared more rapidly in the control than in the catumaxomab group (median 19-26 days versus 47-49 days). The difference in time to deterioration in QoL between the groups was statistically significant for all scores (P<0.01). The hazard ratios ranged from 0.08 to 0.24 (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with catumaxomab delayed deterioration in QoL in patients with MA. Compared with paracentesis alone, catumaxomab enabled patients to benefit from better QoL for a prolonged survival period.

Prediction of nutritional status and intestinal tumor involvement in patients with primary or recurrent ovarian cancer: Results of a prospective study

5570

Background: Global malnutrition is widespread among patients with ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of the nutritional status on the clinical outcome of patients with primary or recurrent ovarian and peritoneal cancer. Methods: In a two-year-period (January 2007 - December 2008) 152 consecutive patients were analysed. 79 (52%) of them had primary and 73 (48%) recurrent disease. At the time of admission for surgical therapy, the body composition was analysed with Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) using phase angle alpha and ratio of extra-cellular mass and body cell mass (ECM/BCM). Serum protein parameters were registered. The risk of malnutrition was estimated by Nutritional Risk Score (NRS). During operation a standardised and validated tumor documentation tool (IMO) was performed. Nutritional parameters were correlated with IMO-parameters. Results: The median age of patients was 56 years (range 48–66) with median BMI 24.4 kg/m2 (range 21.8–27.3). In 23% primary and 14% recurrent cases a high nutritional risk was classified (NRS≥3). These patients had significantly lower serum albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin levels compared to patients with NRS<3 (p < 0.05). FIGO stage and NRS correlated negatively with phase angle alpha and positively with ECM/BCM in patients with primary diagnosis (p < 0.05). Patients with primary or recurrent disease who required surgical resection of small or large intestine, phase angle alpha and serum albumin level were significantly lower than in patients with no intestinal involvement (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Independent of tumor stage, the preoperative evaluation of BIA, especially phase angle α, is a valid method to predict surgical outcome in patients with ovarian and peritoneal cancer.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Current management of borderline ovarian tumors: A multicenter survey of 323 clinics in Germany, on behalf of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO)

e16568

Background: The aim of this survey was to analyze the standard of care in diagnostic, surgery, chemotherapy and aftercare management of patients with Borderline tumor of the ovary (BOT) in Germany. Methods: A structured questionnaire comprising different dimensions of treatment of BOT was sent to all 1,114 gynecological departments in Germany. The questionnaire could be returned anonymously. Results: The overall response rate was 29.0% (323 departments). The most departments were on secondary care (71.8%), tertiary care (23.2%) or university hospital (5.0%) level. The most clinicians performed not more than 5 BOT operations (89.2%) per year. 93.2% of the gynecological departments used additional preoperative diagnostic procedures to the classical bimanual examination and vaginal ultrasound in a case of unclear ovarian tumor: CA-125 or CEA detection (95%), CT-scan (76%), Doppler ultrasound (66%), MRI (36%), or PET-CT (1.7%) techniques. In university hospitals (87%), tertiary care (80%), secondary care (68%) and most of the general practitioners’ hospitals (64%) a regular fresh frozen section was the intraoperative diagnostic standard. For diagnosis of BOT mostly laparotomy (48%) and laparoscopy (15%) were performed, whereas 19% used a diagnostic laparoscopy, followed by laparotomy for completion in a second intervention or switch from laparoscopy to laparotomy in the primary surgical session (18%). In young women with desire to preserve fertility clinicians performed much seldom unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (92%) and only in 53% biopsies of the contra lateral ovary and in 67% peritoneal biopsies. Generally biopsies of the contra lateral ovary were performed in 4% to 53% of all patients. Chemotherapy was the second therapy option (64%) after surgery (97%) for BOT, mostly favored in “high-risk” patients with tumor residual, micro invasion or invasive implants. Conclusions: These data demonstrate a high clinical unsureness in the clinical management of borderline tumors of the ovary.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Do patients with recurrent ovarian cancer benefit from relative tumor reduction? Results from a prospective study

e16541

Background: Primary cytoreduction is the cornerstone in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). However, the roles of salvage surgery and of tumor reduction are still discussed controversially. The present study was conducted to assess the impact of secondary tumor reduction surgery on progression-free survival and on overall survival. Methods: Between September 2000 and April 2006, 177 consecutive patients (pts) with a first relapse of OC underwent secondary tumor reduction surgery at our department. The achieved tumor reduction was categorized as 1/5 (20% tumor debulked), 2/5 (40%), 3/5 (60%), 4/5 (80%), or 5/5 (macroscopic tumor-free) and the maximal tumor diameter was also denoted (tumor free, < 1cm, ≥ 1cm). Results: The median age was 56 years (95% CI: 23–83), median follow-up was 10.8 months (95% CI: 1–65). In 79 pts (44.6%) complete macroscopic tumor resection was achieved (median overall survival (OAS) 60.6 months, 21.3–99.8 and median progression-free survival (PFS) 14.9 months, 11.7–18, p < 0.001). In 56 pts (31.6%) 4/5 of the tumor was removed (OAS 15.6 months, 10.3–20.8 and PFS 9 months, 7.2–10.7, p < 0.001), in 13 (7.3%) 3/5 (OAS 21.7 months, no interval and PFS 12 months, 0.0–24.5, p < 0.001) and in 7 (4%) each 2/5 tumor reduction (OAS was 14.2 months, 4.1–24.2 and PFS 11 months, 5.9–16, p < 0.001) and if 1/5 tumor reduction was achieved OAS was 11.1 months, 2–20.1 and PFS 7 months, 2.5–11.4, p < 0.001. Fifteen pts (8.5%) had a bulky unresected disease (OAS 4.7 months, 1.0–8.3 and PFS of 3.7 months, 0–7.6, p < 0.001). From these 98 (55.4%) pts without complete macroscopic tumor resection, 46 were left with <1cm tumor diameter (OAS 17.2 months, 13–21.4 and PFS 9 months, 7.4–10.6 p < 0.001) and 52 with ≥1cm tumor diameter (OAS 8.7 months, 4.2–13.2 and PFS 7 months, 5.8–8.2 p < 0.001). All in all, the median postoperative survival for pts with tumor residuals and any tumor reduction (4/5, 3/5, 2/5. and 1/5 tumor reduction) were better when compared to pts with no tumor reduction (24.8 months vs. 4.7, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate a significant benefit for salvage surgery if a macroscopic complete tumor resection can be achieved. We could not see any effect of relative tumor reduction on PFS or OAS.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

What do patients think about CA-125 monitoring in the follow-up? Results from a multicenter trial in 1,060 patients with ovarian cancer

5522

Background: In the clinical day CA-125 monitoring is frequently used as a part of follow-up care for patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, the potential benefit of CA-125 controls in the absence clinical symptoms are still unclear.There is little known about the expectations and preferences of patients with OC. Therefore we have initiated a multi-institutional survey. Methods: A semi-structered consisting 15 questions was developed in a pilot-study of 20 patients. After this validation all gynecological departments and gynecological-oncological practices were invited to participate in this trial using an anonynomous print version of the questionaire Results: Between December 2006 and December 2007 a total of 1,060 patients were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range 16–87). 60% of the patients had primary ovarian cancer, 40% had relapsed ovarian cancer. Routine follow-up visits were mostly performed by gynaecologists in a gynaecological practice (56.9%) and in hospitals (49.5%). Patients were informed about the procedures and goals of cancer care predominantly after primary surgery (62.5%) and in 15.7% after last cycle of first-line chemotherapy. 7.7% declared that they were informed only at the first follow-up visit, 9.2% stated that they have never received any information about their cancer care management. According the patient´s opinion the main objective for the follow-up is the early detection of relapse and a prolongation of overall survival (95.8%). About more than 90% get CA-125 measurements. These were the procedures with highest anxiety but also the most important procedure for the patient. Finally, most patients (89%) were satisfied from their management of cancer care. Conclusions: The present study is the largest survey about cancer care so far and provides several important data for physician-patient communication concerning the follow-up management of patients OC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Topotecan weekly versus routine 5-day schedule in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (TOWER): A randomized, multicenter trial of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO)

5553

Background: In women with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, weekly administration of topotecan (Tw) may be equally effective, but better tolerated than conventional 5-day dosing (Tc). We conducted a randomized multicenter trial to validate this assumption. Methods: The trial was pre-registered at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT00170677 ). Women with platinum-resistant ovarian and fallopian tube cancers or primary peritoneal carcinoma, and measurable or assessable disease (GCIG criteria) were randomized to receive either Tw (d1,8,15/q28d, 4 mg/m2) or Tc (d1–5/q21d, 1.25 mg/m2). The predefined stopping rule, based on the primary endpoint of best CA-125 or tumor response, was not reached (presented at ASCO 2007, Abstract 5526). This permitted the accrual of 194 patients, 154 of whom could be assessed for CA-125 or tumor response (SD + CR + PR). We also compared progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as toxicity between trial groups. Results: Mean age was 61.8 (SD 9.8) years, and 59 women were on third-line treatment. Patients received a total of 809 cycles of chemotherapy. Demographic baseline characteristics, tumor stages and grades, and previous lines of chemotherapy were well balanced between treatment groups. There were 35 / 75 (47%) and 45 / 79 (57%) responses in the Tw and Tc groups, respectively (risk ratio [RR] 1.22, 95% CI 0.89–1.66). Median PFS and OS did not differ markedly between both regimens (3.2 versus 4.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% CI 0.96–1.77 and 9.8 versus 10.0 months, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.77–1.52). The risk of grade III/IV hematological toxicity was significantly lower in the Tw group (anemia: RR 0.35, p = 0.007, neutropenia: RR 0.38, p = 0.0001, thrombopenia: RR 0.23, p = 0.0004). Conclusions: Weekly administration of topotecan shows no substantial difference in endpoints of effectiveness compared to conventional dosing, but is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of severe hematological toxicity. Weekly topotecan should be considered as a possible treatment alternative in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer because of its favourable benefit-risk-profile.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Role of multivisceral cytoreductive surgery in patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC): Who will not benefit from radical tumor debulking?

16036

Background: Despite improvement in surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy most pts with ovarian cancer (OC) experience a relapse within 2 years after first diagnosis. For primary OC a standard concensus on optimal staging and surgical guidelines is established. The role of radical tumor debulking surgery in ROC is not clearly defined. Aim of this study was to analyze clinical parameters for prediction of operability and impact on overall survival in ROC. Methods: Within the framework of the international project “Tumor bank Ovarian Cancer“ (TOC) a systematic prospective surgical and histomorphological tumor documentation for ROC was performed. Results: Between september 2000 and december 2006, 307 multivisceral operations on 254 pts with ROC were performed consecutively in our department. Median age was 55 years (19–83), median follow-up 15 months (1–75). 34.8% of pts experienced first relapse of OC. Overall, 96.3% of pts received a platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, whereas 73.4% were platinum sensitive. In 55% of pts first relapse surgery was performed. In 41.4% of pts complete macroscopic tumor resection was achieved, associated with a significantly better recurrence-free (median 20.6 vs 13.2, p=0.001) and overall survival (median 42 vs 12 months, p<0.001) compared to pts with any postoperative residual tumor. In multivariate analysis, complete tumor resection was associated with the absence of tumor burden in the upper abdomen (p=0.001) and absence of ascites (p=0.05). Prognostic factors for postoperative survival were: tumor resection (0 cm vs > 0 cm, p<0.001), intraoperative volume of ascites (0 ml vs > 0 ml, p=0.006) and response to platinum-based first-line therapy (platinum sensitive vs platinum-resistant, p=0.006). Conclusions: Radical tumor debulking in patients with ROC is associated with a low postoperative morbidity and mortality. Complete mascroscopic tumor resection is correlated with a significant better long-term prognosis and influenced by tumor spread and presence of ascites. Pts with ROC will not benefit from multivisceral cytoreductive surgery in case of platinum resistance to first-line chemotherapy, presence of intraoperative ascites and postoperative residual tumor.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Topotecan weekly versus routine 5-day schedule in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (TOWER): A randomized, two-stage phase-II study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynaecological Oncology (NOGGO)

5526

Background: Optimizing the therapeutic index (that is, maintaining drug effectiveness while reducing toxicity) is a major goal in chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Early phase-I/II studies suggest that weekly topotecan (T) might be effective and apparently better tolerated than the established 5-day regimen. As yet, no randomized comparison of both regimes was attempted. To prove the hypothesis of an improved therapeutic index with weekly T, we conducted a randomized, multicenter, two-stage phase-II trial, and herein present the data of the planned interim analysis. Methods: Pts with platinresistent ovarian and fallopian tube cancers or primary peritoneal carcinoma, measurable or assessable disease (GCIG-CA-125 response criteria), were eligible. Pts were randomized to receive either weekly T (d1,8,15/q28d, 4 mg/m2) or T from d1–5/q21d at a dose of 1.25 mg/m2. According to Gehan’s two-stage-design, both arms were handled as independent studies. Overall response rate (CR + PR) was defined as primary study endpoint, secondary endpoints of the interim analysis were toxicity and safety. Results: 28 pts in the weekly and 21 pts in the conventional group, enrolled at 38 centers form the basis of this report. 230 cycles of chemotherapy were evaluated for toxicity analyses. Median age was 61 years (range, 36 - 82 years). Demographic baseline characteristics, including tumor stage and grade were well balanced between treatment arms. There were 2/28 and 5/21 responses in weekly and the conventional arm, respectively (Risk Ratio [RR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06 - 1.40, p=0.122). The risk of early treatment termination due to tumor progression (RR 1.39, 95%CI 0.75 - 2.56), haematological (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 - 3.97) or non- hematological toxicities (RR 1.96, 95% CI 0.18 - 20.83) did not differ significantly between groups. The only three events of neutropenic fever occurred in the conventional arm (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.99 - 1.16). Conclusions: Weekly T is well tolerated and potentially active. The second stage of this study will require additional 46 patients each arm. Complete enrolment is expected to be accomplished in May 2007.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sequential therapy with carboplatin (C) followed by paclitaxel (P) as first-line chemotherapy in 105 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC): Results of a multicenter phase II study of the Northeastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology

5533

Background: For the adjuvant setting of AOC after primary radical surgery the combination of paclitaxel and platinum in a three weeks schedule has emerged as the current standard. Exposition duration of the drug is important for cell death. In animal model additional anti-angionetic effects of low dose paclitaxel infusion was observed. A sequential schedule of these agents can potentially yield in an improved therapeutic index. Methods: In this multicenter-phase II trial after primary radical surgery 4 cycles of Carboplatin at a dose of AUC 5 (d1/q21d) followed by 12 cycles weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 80mg/m2 (d1/q7d) was applied. All patients with haemoglobin levels < 12mg/dl get primary erythropoietin. No primary use of other growth factors were allowed. Eligibility criteria were: AOC (FIGO IIb-IV), ECOG performance status 0–2, normal organ functions. Results: Between 07/2003 and 05/2005, 105 patients from 27 institutions were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (23–80). FIGO-stages were: II: 11.4%, III: 67.6%, IV: 14.2%. 1,441 cycles were analyzed and in median 16 courses were applied (range 0–16). The incidence of non-hematological toxicities was very low. 25 % of all patients experienced alopecia (grade 1–2). Neurotoxicity and nausea/vomiting (grade III-IV) occurred in no patients. Grade 3–4 hematological toxicity (% of all pts) included: thrombocytopenia (16 %), anemia (3%), leucopenia (22%), neutropenic fever (0%). 96% received erythropoietin. Thromboembolic events (5%) were not increased in patients who received erythropoietin. After a median follow-up interval of 10 months (range: 1–27 months) 20 patients died, the median overall survival is already not reached. The progression free survival is 19 months (range:10–23 months). Conclusions: These results suggest that this sequential regimen using weekly paclitaxel represents an efficacious and well-tolerated regimen. A randomized study comparing this new schedule with the conventional 3-week protocol is warranted. (Supported by Bristol Myers Squibb Germany and Ortho Biotech Germany)

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Topotecan (T) and carboplatin (C) in the treatment of platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (ROC): Results of a multicenter phase I/II study

5089

Background: Despite of the effectiveness of radical surgery and first-line chemotherapy, most patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer will relapse. Paclitaxel (P) in combination with C as second-line treatment improves the outcome of pts with platinum-sensitive ROC in comparison to C monotherapy. Due to polyneuropathy and alopecia this regimen can not be offered to all pts. Therefore, other platinum-combinations are required. We conducted a phase I/II study to define the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and the tolerability of combination therapy with T and C. Methods: Pts with platinum-sensitive ROC and primary standard therapy were stratified according to treatment-free interval (TFI): 6–12 months (A) and ≥12 months (B). Following dose regimens were analysed: T 1mg/m2/d1–3 + C AUC5/d3 and T 0.75 mg/m2/d1–3 + C AUC5/d3, q21d. DLT was based on the first 4 courses and defined as: CTC grade 3/4 hematological and grade 2 non-hematological toxicity (excepted alopecia, vomiting), treatment delay >7d. Primary endpoints were DLT and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were remission rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From 06/04 to 08/05, 28 pts were enrolled, 26 pts (A:13 pts, B:13 pts) were eligible. Median age was 61.5 years. A total of 141 cycles were analysed, median number of cycles was 6 (range A:2–8, B:1–10). DLTs were: leucopenia (n = 5) and thrombocytopenia (n = 1). MTD was reached at dose: T: 0.75mg/m2 and C: AUC5. Overall, grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities (in% of all cycles), for (A) and (B) respectively, were: anemia 4% vs. 4%, leucopenia 34% vs. 13%, neutropenia 30% vs. 31%, thrombocytopenia 7% vs. 6%. Febrile neutropenia 4.3% vs. 0%. Darbepoetin alfa was given in 13.5% of all cycles. Overall, grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were infrequent (< 5%). Overall RR (95% CI) was 50% (29.7–70.1) [A: 30.8% (0.1–61.1), B: 69.3% (38.7–90.9)]. Median follow-up was 5.8 mo, median PFS (95% CI) was 7.7 mo (1.3–9.4) [A: 6.2 (1.3–7.2), B: 8.0 (7.3–9.4)]. Median overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: TC is a feasible and effective chemotherapy regimen for platinum sensitive ROC. Tolerability is not associated to TFI. The recommended dose for subsequent studies is T:0.75 and C:AUC5.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

What do adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer patients (BC) expect from their doctors? Final results of a german survey in 617 patients:

6085

Background: An increasing number of breast cancer patients in western countries are accessing the Internet for medical information. The following study was condcuted to explore the information needs and preferences with special focus on doctor-patient communication. Methods: A questionnaire was developed and validated in a phase-I study and was than administered to breast cancer patients both via internet (online) or via a print-version consisting of 62 questions. Results: A total of 617 patients were interviewed, 552 by online version (online group) and 65 by printed questionnaire (print group). The median age of the online group was 47 years (21–85), for the print group 53 years (40–92). 65% of the patients were treated with the intention of cure, 35% of the patients had a metastatic disease. The median time of consultation communicating the information “You have breast cancer”, was 15 minutes (0–300). The most effective and “patient-relevant source of information and explanations of treatment options was the consultation with their physician (84%). When asked to suggest areas for improvement, most frequent answers were: more alternative therapies should be offered by physician (54%); physicians should have more time for explanations (51%); cooperation between involved physicians should be optimized (39%). Most relevant questions for patients are: “Do I receive the adequate treatment?” (89%); “How many patients with my disease does my physician treat?” (46%); “Can I be enrolled into a trial?” (46%). An independent second opinion centre was desired by 94% of the patients, but only 20% know such an institution. Conclusions: This study underlines the need to give patients with breast cancer all details on treatment options and cancer managements.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.