The relationship of glycaemic control and triglycerides in patients with diabetes mellitus: a PreCIS Database Study

AIMS

A common therapeutic approach in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have elevated triglycerides (TGs) is to treat the hyperglycaemia before specifically targeting high TG. The aims of the current study were (i) to determine whether there was a relationship between glycated haemoglobin (HgbA1c) and TG levels at the baseline visit and (ii) to analyse the relationship between DeltaHgbA1c and DeltaTG after treatment.

METHODS

Among 650 consecutive diabetic patients seen in the Cleveland Clinic Preventive Cardiology Department, 372 had both baseline and post-treatment HgbA1c and TG values. We analysed the relationship between baseline HgbA1c and TG as well as between the change in HgbA1c and the change in TG. For analysis, patients were divided into nine groups by tertiles of HgbA1c (< or =6.6, 6.7-7.8 and >7.8%) and TG (< or =1.75, 1.76-3.89 and >3.89 mmol/l) at baseline.

RESULTS

At baseline, there was a small correlation between HgbA1c and TG (r(2) = 0.051; p < 0.001). For the entire group, there was a significant correlation between DeltaHgbA1c and DeltaTG from baseline to follow-up (r(2) = 0.077; p < 0.001). Analyses by tertiles showed that DeltaTG were only associated with changes in two groups: HgbA1c tertile 3 (>7.8%) and TG tertiles 2 (r(2) = 0.24; p < 0.0001) and 3 (r(2) = 0.187; p = 0.003). For every 1% change in the top tertile HgbA1c, there was a 9.3% change in TG (tertile 2) and a 9.8% change in TG (tertile 3).

CONCLUSIONS

These observations suggest that for patients with diabetes mellitus and elevated TG, the effect of HgbA1c reduction has limited effects on TG reduction. Patients may benefit from TG-specific therapy initiated earlier rather than waiting to see effects of glycaemic control.

Liability and validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol in Turkey

OBJECTIVE

To assess the inter-rater reliability between nurses and the convergent validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) in the Turkish context.

METHODS

Two nurses applied the original AEP concurrently to a random subsample of 335 patient-days in internal medicine, general surgery, and gynaecology departments at a university hospital and a government teaching hospital, as a part of a larger study. Inter-rater reliability was tested by calculating overall agreement and specific agreements between nurse reviewers' AEP assessments. Validity was tested by comparing the assessments of the nurses based on the AEP with the implicit judgements of five expert physicians on a random subsample of 818 patient-days. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the AEP were calculated. Reliability and validity were also evaluated by the K statistic.

RESULTS

In the reliability test, there was a high level of agreement between the two independent raters applying the AEP in the three departments studied: overall agreement = 90.7-97.6%; specific inappropriate agreement = 69.1-92.3%; specific appropriate agreement = 88.3-96.6%. In validity testing, the AEP had a sensitivity of 0.83-0.97, specificity of 0.62-0.80, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.84-0.88 and 0.73-0.95 respectively. Kappa coefficients in internal medicine and gynaecology indicated almost perfect agreement in reliability testing and moderate agreement in validity testing. In general surgery, the K coefficients showed substantial agreement in both tests.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the AEP is a reliable and valid instrument to assess appropriateness of patient-days in Turkey.