Intradermal testing for autoimmune progesterone dermatitis: should we be basing the diagnosis on it?

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (APD) is a rare skin disorder with varying presentations, resulting from hypersensitivity to endogenous progesterone during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. The diagnosis has been traditionally confirmed with intradermal progesterone testing (IPT) or intramuscular challenge with progesterone or its derivatives. We present a case of a 31-year-old woman with suspected APD who underwent IPT to progesterone. The patient's cyclical symptoms, positive skin reaction and symptoms following IPT were sufficient to make a diagnosis of APD. However, we also tested 10 healthy female controls without symptoms of APD, and found that 9 of these also developed positive skin reactions to intradermal progesterone at 15 min, 24 and 48 h, albeit to a lesser extent. Therefore, these results raise doubts about the validity of using IPT to make a diagnosis of APD. Further research on appropriate testing is needed.

Migrant status and identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis and transitioning to a psychotic disorder

BACKGROUND

Certain migrant groups are more likely to develop a psychotic disorder compared to the native-born populations, and a younger age at migration is associated with greater risk. However, it is not known at which stage migration has an effect on the development of psychotic disorders. We examined whether migrants were more likely to be identified as ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) compared to native-born young people and whether migrant status was associated with the risk of transition to a full-threshold psychotic disorder.

METHODS

The cohort included all young people aged 15-24 who were identified as UHR at a specialist clinic over a five-year period (2012-16). Australian census data were used to obtain the at-risk population. Poisson regression was used to calculate rate ratios and Cox regression analysis determined hazard ratios.

RESULTS

467 young people were identified as UHR, of which 13.5% (n = 63) were born overseas. First-generation migrants were 2.6-fold less likely to be identified as UHR compared to Australian-born young people (IRR = 0.39, 95% CI [0.30, 0.51], P < 0.001). There was no difference between migrant and native-born young people in their risk of transitioning to a psychotic disorder (HR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.39, 2.08], P = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

UHR first-generation migrants may be under-accessing mental health services.