Motor unit action potential (MUAP) parameters affected by editing duration cursors

INTRODUCTION

Quantitative electromyography (QEMG) allows fast analysis of motor unit action potential (MUAP) parameters such as amplitude, duration, size index (SI), phases, turns and firing rate. When automated duration cursor placement is incorrect, the electrodiagnostician will manually edit this function potentially introducing bias to the final results.

OBJECTIVE

To identify that (1) size index is the MUAP parameter least affected by manually editing duration cursors and (2) MUAP amplitude will influence the manual cursor correction rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Included were twenty-one consecutive patients who had QEMG with monopolar needle electrode for diagnostic evaluation of their myofascial pain symptoms. Evaluated for neck pain included 6 bilateral upper limb and cervical paraspinal muscles and for lower back pain were 5 bilateral lower limb and lower back muscles. Twenty MUAPs were recorded from each muscle and hardcopies of data obtained before and after manual edit.

RESULTS

Of a total of 5360 MUAPs analyzed 1764 (33%) required manual editing of duration cursors. Cursor correction rate 120 MUAP s/individual muscle analyzed was also similar at 33+/-17%. Percentage change in duration more so than turns, before and after correction, was significantly larger than that of other parameters. No significant differences in percentage changes noted between SI and phases.

CONCLUSIONS

SI and phases are least influenced by the manual correction of duration cursors since there is insubstantial amplitude and area at the tail-end of the MUAP.

Case-control study on evaluation of BCG vaccination of newborn in Rangoon, Burma

A case-control study was carried out on 311 tuberculous children under 5 years of age and 1536 non-tuberculous controls, matched for age, sex and the sector of residence, to evaluate the effectiveness of BCG vaccination of newborns in Rangoon, Burma. BCG vaccination status of both the cases and their matched controls was recorded. BCG vaccination in the newborn conferred 38% protection against the sum total of all forms of tuberculosis. The protective efficacy varied with the different forms of tuberculosis. It was only 20% for primary complex and 52% and 80% for tuberculous meningitis and disseminated tuberculosis, respectively. The protective effect of BCG vaccination was highest during the first 3 years after vaccination and then waned during the subsequent years. Although the protective efficacy seemed to be low, the impact of a BCG vaccination programme on the preventable deaths, neurological sequelae and the health services expenses is considerable.

BCG test reaction in previously BCG vaccinated children

BCG test reactions were studied in 1095 non-tuberculous children from 6 months to 5 years of age, who had received BCG vaccination in the newborn period, in order to find out the diagnostic value of the BCG test in previously BCG vaccinated children. Previous BCG vaccination has an effect on the BCG test reaction in the form of an accelerated BCG reaction. Although the degree of reaction decreases with time, 51.4% of children still showed a strongly accelerated BCG reaction 4 1/2-5 years after BCG vaccination. It is concluded that the BCG test cannot be used as a diagnostic test for tuberculosis in children under 5 years of age who have had previous BCG vaccination.