1
|
Johnson KA, Dosenbach NUF, Gordon EM, Welle CG, Wilkins KB, Bronte-Stewart HM, Voon V, Morishita T, Sakai Y, Merner AR, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Williamson T, Horn A, Gilron R, O'Keeffe J, Gittis AH, Neumann WJ, Little S, Provenza NR, Sheth SA, Fasano A, Holt-Becker AB, Raike RS, Moore L, Pathak YJ, Greene D, Marceglia S, Krinke L, Tan H, Bergman H, Pötter-Nerger M, Sun B, Cabrera LY, McIntyre CC, Harel N, Mayberg HS, Krystal AD, Pouratian N, Starr PA, Foote KD, Okun MS, Wong JK. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: pushing the forefront of neuromodulation with functional network mapping, biomarkers for adaptive DBS, bioethical dilemmas, AI-guided neuromodulation, and translational advancements. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1320806. [PMID: 38450221 PMCID: PMC10915873 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1320806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank XI was held on August 9-11, 2023 in Gainesville, Florida with the theme of "Pushing the Forefront of Neuromodulation". The keynote speaker was Dr. Nico Dosenbach from Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. He presented his research recently published in Nature inn a collaboration with Dr. Evan Gordon to identify and characterize the somato-cognitive action network (SCAN), which has redefined the motor homunculus and has led to new hypotheses about the integrative networks underpinning therapeutic DBS. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers, and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging DBS technologies, as well as logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The group estimated that globally more than 263,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: cutting-edge translational neuromodulation, cutting-edge physiology, advances in neuromodulation from Europe and Asia, neuroethical dilemmas, artificial intelligence and computational modeling, time scales in DBS for mood disorders, and advances in future neuromodulation devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara A. Johnson
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Nico U. F. Dosenbach
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Evan M. Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Cristin G. Welle
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Kevin B. Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Valerie Voon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Takashi Morishita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuki Sakai
- ATR Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Amanda R. Merner
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Theresa Williamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- MGH Neurosurgery and Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Aryn H. Gittis
- Biological Sciences and Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nicole R. Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Division of Neurology, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network (UHN), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abbey B. Holt-Becker
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Lisa Moore
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Valencia, CA, United States
| | | | - David Greene
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Sara Marceglia
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Newronika SPA, Milan, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Edmond and Lily Safar Center (ELSC) for Brain Research and Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Monika Pötter-Nerger
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bomin Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Laura Y. Cabrera
- Neuroethics, Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Philosophy, and Bioethics, and the Rock Ethics Institute, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States
| | - Cameron C. McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Noam Harel
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andrew D. Krystal
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Butson CR, Choi EY, Baker JL, O'Sullivan KP, Janson AP, Bergin M, Bronte-Stewart HM, Chua J, DeGeorge L, Dikmen S, Fogarty A, Gerber LM, Krel M, Maldonado J, Radovan M, Shah SA, Su J, Temkin N, Tourdias T, Victor JD, Waters A, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Fins JJ, Machado AG, Rutt BK, Henderson JM. Thalamic deep brain stimulation in traumatic brain injury: a phase 1, randomized feasibility study. Nat Med 2023; 29:3162-3174. [PMID: 38049620 PMCID: PMC11087147 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02638-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
Converging evidence indicates that impairments in executive function and information-processing speed limit quality of life and social reentry after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI). These deficits reflect dysfunction of frontostriatal networks for which the central lateral (CL) nucleus of the thalamus is a critical node. The primary objective of this feasibility study was to test the safety and efficacy of deep brain stimulation within the CL and the associated medial dorsal tegmental (CL/DTTm) tract.Six participants with msTBI, who were between 3 and 18 years post-injury, underwent surgery with electrode placement guided by imaging and subject-specific biophysical modeling to predict activation of the CL/DTTm tract. The primary efficacy measure was improvement in executive control indexed by processing speed on part B of the trail-making test.All six participants were safely implanted. Five participants completed the study and one was withdrawn for protocol non-compliance. Processing speed on part B of the trail-making test improved 15% to 52% from baseline, exceeding the 10% benchmark for improvement in all five cases.CL/DTTm deep brain stimulation can be safely applied and may improve executive control in patients with msTBI who are in the chronic phase of recovery.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02881151 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D Schiff
- Feil Family Brain Mind Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher R Butson
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Eun Young Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan L Baker
- Feil Family Brain Mind Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kyle P O'Sullivan
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrew P Janson
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michael Bergin
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason Chua
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurel DeGeorge
- Feil Family Brain Mind Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sureyya Dikmen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Adam Fogarty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Linda M Gerber
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Krel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jose Maldonado
- Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Radovan
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sudhin A Shah
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason Su
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Thomas Tourdias
- Department of Neuroimaging, University of Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France
| | - Jonathan D Victor
- Feil Family Brain Mind Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abigail Waters
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Joseph J Fins
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andre G Machado
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Brian K Rutt
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jaimie M Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilkins KB, Melbourne JA, Akella P, Bronte-Stewart HM. Unraveling the complexities of programming neural adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1310393. [PMID: 38094147 PMCID: PMC10716917 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1310393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past three decades, deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) has been applied in a continuous open loop fashion, unresponsive to changes in a given patient's state or symptoms over the course of a day. Advances in recent neurostimulator technology enable the possibility for closed loop adaptive DBS (aDBS) for PD as a treatment option in the near future in which stimulation adjusts in a demand-based manner. Although aDBS offers great clinical potential for treatment of motor symptoms, it also brings with it the need for better understanding how to implement it in order to maximize its benefits. In this perspective, we outline considerations for programing several key parameters for aDBS based on our experience across several aDBS-capable research neurostimulators. At its core, aDBS hinges on successful identification of relevant biomarkers that can be measured reliably in real-time working in cohesion with a control policy that governs stimulation adaption. However, auxiliary parameters such as the window in which stimulation is allowed to adapt, as well as the rate it changes, can be just as impactful on performance and vary depending on the control policy and patient. A standardize protocol for programming aDBS will be crucial to ensuring its effective application in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin B. Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jillian A. Melbourne
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Pranav Akella
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lu C, Khosla D, Kent A, Bronte-Stewart HM, Rosenbluth KH. Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Real-World Evidence with Long Term Follow-Up. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2023; 13:29. [PMID: 37663529 PMCID: PMC10473165 DOI: 10.5334/tohm.775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for the treatment of hand tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). This retrospective post-market analysis evaluated the usage, effectiveness, and safety of TAPS in patients using TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period in a real-world setting. Methods Study personnel screened a manufacturer's database for TAPS devices that had been prescribed for the treatment of ET and used beyond a 90-day trial period between August 2019 and January 2023. The device logs were collected to extract the therapy usage, accelerometry measurements, and on-board ratings of tremor improvement. Study personnel also evaluated results of a voluntary survey requested by the manufacturer after the 90-day trial period. Adverse events were assessed from patients' complaints reported to the manufacturer. Results A total of 1,223 patients in the manufacturer's database met the study criteria. The patients had used therapy between 90 and 1,233 days, with average usage of 5.6 sessions per week. Accelerometry data indicated 89% of patients experienced tremor improvement, with an average 64% improvement. 63% of patients rated at least half of their sessions as improved. No significant habituation was observed in patients who used therapy for more than one year. Approximately 62% of survey respondents either had reduced medication or planned to consult physicians about their medication usage. No serious safety events were reported, and 10% of patients reported minor safety complaints. Discussion The analysis demonstrates the real-world effectiveness and safety of TAPS beyond a 90-day trial period over a longer timeframe and in a larger population size than previously published evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn H. Rosenbluth
- Cala Health Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Melbourne JA, Kehnemouyi YM, O'Day JJ, Wilkins KB, Gala AS, Petrucci MN, Lambert EF, Dorris HJ, Diep C, Herron JA, Bronte-Stewart HM. Kinematic adaptive deep brain stimulation for gait impairment and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:1099-1101. [PMID: 37429355 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian A Melbourne
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Yasmine M Kehnemouyi
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Johanna J O'Day
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Kevin B Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Aryaman S Gala
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Matthew N Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Emilia F Lambert
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Hannah J Dorris
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth University, Hanover, NH, USA.
| | - Cameron Diep
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Jeffrey A Herron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilkins KB, Kehnemouyi YM, Petrucci MN, Anderson RW, Parker JE, Trager MH, Neuville RS, Koop MM, Velisar A, Blumenfeld Z, Quinn EJ, Bronte-Stewart HM. Bradykinesia and Its Progression Are Related to Interhemispheric Beta Coherence. Ann Neurol 2023; 93:1029-1039. [PMID: 36641645 PMCID: PMC10191890 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bradykinesia is the major cardinal motor sign of Parkinson disease (PD), but its neural underpinnings are unclear. The goal of this study was to examine whether changes in bradykinesia following long-term subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) are linked to local STN beta (13-30 Hz) dynamics or a wider bilateral network dysfunction. METHODS Twenty-one individuals with PD implanted with sensing neurostimulators (Activa® PC + S, Medtronic, PLC) in the STN participated in a longitudinal 'washout' therapy study every three to 6 months for an average of 3 years. At each visit, participants were withdrawn from medication (12/24/48 hours) and had DBS turned off (>60 minutes) before completing a repetitive wrist-flexion extension task, a validated quantitative assessment of bradykinesia, while local field potentials were recorded. Local STN beta dynamics were investigated via beta power and burst duration, while interhemispheric beta synchrony was assessed with STN-STN beta coherence. RESULTS Higher interhemispheric STN beta coherence, but not contralateral beta power or burst duration, was significantly associated with worse bradykinesia. Bradykinesia worsened off therapy over time. Interhemispheric STN-STN beta coherence also increased over time, whereas beta power and burst duration remained stable. The observed change in bradykinesia was related to the change in interhemispheric beta coherence, with greater increases in synchrony associated with further worsening of bradykinesia. INTERPRETATION Together, these findings implicate interhemispheric beta synchrony as a neural correlate of the progression of bradykinesia following chronic STN DBS. This could imply the existence of a pathological bilateral network contributing to bradykinesia in PD. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:1029-1039.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin B Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Yasmine M Kehnemouyi
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford Schools of Engineering & Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Matthew N Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford Schools of Engineering & Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Ross W Anderson
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, CA, United States
| | - Jordan E Parker
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Megan H Trager
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Raumin S Neuville
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- The University of California School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Mandy M Koop
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Anca Velisar
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Zack Blumenfeld
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
- University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Emma J Quinn
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Credit Karma, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford Schools of Engineering & Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kehnemouyi YM, Petrucci MN, Wilkins KB, Melbourne JA, Bronte-Stewart HM. The Sequence Effect Worsens Over Time in Parkinson's Disease and Responds to Open and Closed-Loop Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation. J Parkinsons Dis 2023:JPD223368. [PMID: 37125563 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-223368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The sequence effect is the progressive deterioration in speech, limb movement, and gait that leads to an inability to communicate, manipulate objects, or walk without freezing of gait. Many studies have demonstrated a lack of improvement of the sequence effect from dopaminergic medication, however few studies have studied the metric over time or investigated the effect of open-loop deep brain stimulation in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the sequence effect worsens over time and/or is improved on clinical (open-loop) deep brain stimulation (DBS). METHODS Twenty-one people with PD with bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS performed thirty seconds of instrumented repetitive wrist flexion extension and the MDS-UPDRS III off therapy, prior to activation of DBS and every six months for up to three years. A sub-cohort of ten people performed the task during randomized presentations of different intensities of STN DBS. RESULTS The sequence effect was highly correlated with the overall MDS-UPDRS III score and the bradykinesia sub-score and worsened over three years. Increasing intensities of STN open-loop DBS improved the sequence effect and one subject demonstrated improvement on both open-loop and closed-loop DBS. CONCLUSION Sequence effect in limb bradykinesia worsened over time off therapy due to disease progression but improved on open-loop DBS. These results demonstrate that DBS is a useful treatment of the debilitating effects of the sequence effect in limb bradykinesia and upon further investigation closed-loop DBS may offer added improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmine M Kehnemouyi
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Matthew N Petrucci
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kevin B Wilkins
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jillian A Melbourne
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wong JK, Deuschl G, Wolke R, Bergman H, Muthuraman M, Groppa S, Sheth SA, Bronte-Stewart HM, Wilkins KB, Petrucci MN, Lambert E, Kehnemouyi Y, Starr PA, Little S, Anso J, Gilron R, Poree L, Kalamangalam GP, Worrell GA, Miller KJ, Schiff ND, Butson CR, Henderson JM, Judy JW, Ramirez-Zamora A, Foote KD, Silburn PA, Li L, Oyama G, Kamo H, Sekimoto S, Hattori N, Giordano JJ, DiEuliis D, Shook JR, Doughtery DD, Widge AS, Mayberg HS, Cha J, Choi K, Heisig S, Obatusin M, Opri E, Kaufman SB, Shirvalkar P, Rozell CJ, Alagapan S, Raike RS, Bokil H, Green D, Okun MS. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Cutting Edge Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, Neuromodulation, Neuroethics, Pain, Interventional Psychiatry, Epilepsy, and Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:813387. [PMID: 35308605 PMCID: PMC8931265 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.813387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
DBS Think Tank IX was held on August 25-27, 2021 in Orlando FL with US based participants largely in person and overseas participants joining by video conferencing technology. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging deep brain stimulation (DBS) technologies as well as the logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The consensus among the DBS Think Tank IX speakers was that DBS expanded in its scope and has been applied to multiple brain disorders in an effort to modulate neural circuitry. After collectively sharing our experiences, it was estimated that globally more than 230,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. As such, this year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: neuromodulation in Europe, Asia and Australia; cutting-edge technologies, neuroethics, interventional psychiatry, adaptive DBS, neuromodulation for pain, network neuromodulation for epilepsy and neuromodulation for traumatic brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Robin Wolke
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Kevin B. Wilkins
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Matthew N. Petrucci
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Emilia Lambert
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Yasmine Kehnemouyi
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Juan Anso
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ro’ee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Lawrence Poree
- Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Giridhar P. Kalamangalam
- Department of Neurology, Wilder Center for Epilepsy Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | | | - Kai J. Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Nicholas D. Schiff
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Christopher R. Butson
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jaimie M. Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jack W. Judy
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Peter A. Silburn
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland and Saint Andrews War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Genko Oyama
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hikaru Kamo
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoko Sekimoto
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Hattori
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - James J. Giordano
- Neuroethics Studies Program, Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Diane DiEuliis
- US Department of Defense Fort Lesley J. McNair, National Defense University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - John R. Shook
- Department of Philosophy and Science Education, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Darin D. Doughtery
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alik S. Widge
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jungho Cha
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kisueng Choi
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Stephen Heisig
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mosadolu Obatusin
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Enrico Opri
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Scott B. Kaufman
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Prasad Shirvalkar
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology (Pain Management) and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Sankaraleengam Alagapan
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Hemant Bokil
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Valencia, CA, United States
| | - David Green
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Neuville RS, Petrucci MN, Wilkins KB, Anderson RW, Hoffman SL, Parker JE, Velisar A, Bronte-Stewart HM. Differential Effects of Pathological Beta Burst Dynamics Between Parkinson's Disease Phenotypes Across Different Movements. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:733203. [PMID: 34858125 PMCID: PMC8631908 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.733203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Resting state beta band (13-30 Hz) oscillations represent pathological neural activity in Parkinson's disease (PD). It is unknown how the peak frequency or dynamics of beta oscillations may change among fine, limb, and axial movements and different disease phenotypes. This will be critical for the development of personalized closed loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) algorithms during different activity states. Methods: Subthalamic (STN) and local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded from a sensing neurostimulator (Activa® PC + S, Medtronic PLC.) in fourteen PD participants (six tremor-dominant and eight akinetic-rigid) off medication/off STN DBS during 30 s of repetitive alternating finger tapping, wrist-flexion extension, stepping in place, and free walking. Beta power peaks and beta burst dynamics were identified by custom algorithms and were compared among movement tasks and between tremor-dominant and akinetic-rigid groups. Results: Beta power peaks were evident during fine, limb, and axial movements in 98% of movement trials; the peak frequencies were similar during each type of movement. Burst power and duration were significantly larger in the high beta band, but not in the low beta band, in the akinetic-rigid group compared to the tremor-dominant group. Conclusion: The conservation of beta peak frequency during different activity states supports the feasibility of patient-specific closed loop DBS algorithms driven by the dynamics of the same beta band during different activities. Akinetic-rigid participants had greater power and longer burst durations in the high beta band than tremor-dominant participants during movement, which may relate to the difference in underlying pathophysiology between phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raumin S. Neuville
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Matthew N. Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Kevin B. Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Ross W. Anderson
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Shannon L. Hoffman
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jordan E. Parker
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Anca Velisar
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Anderson RW, Wilkins KB, Parker JE, Petrucci MN, Kehnemouyi Y, Neuville RS, Cassini D, Trager MH, Koop MM, Velisar A, Blumenfeld Z, Quinn EJ, Henderson J, Bronte-Stewart HM. Lack of progression of beta dynamics after long-term subthalamic neurostimulation. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2021; 8:2110-2120. [PMID: 34636182 PMCID: PMC8607445 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the progression of neural and motor features of Parkinson's disease in a longitudinal study, after washout of medication and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). METHODS Participants with clinically established Parkinson's disease underwent bilateral implantation of DBS leads (18 participants, 13 male) within the STN using standard functional frameless stereotactic technique and multi-pass microelectrode recording. Both DBS leads were connected to an implanted investigative sensing neurostimulator (Activa™ PC + S, Medtronic, PLC). Resting state STN local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded and motor disability, (the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - motor subscale, MDS-UPDRS III) was assessed off therapy at initial programming, and after 6 months, 1 year, and yearly out to 5 years of treatment. The primary endpoint was measured at 3 years. At each visit, medication had been held for over 12/24 h and DBS was turned off for at least 60 min, by which time LFP spectra reached a steady state. RESULTS After 3 years of chronic DBS, there were no increases in STN beta band dynamics (p = 0.98) but there were increases in alpha band dynamics (p = 0.0027, 25 STNs). Similar results were observed in a smaller cohort out to 5 years. There was no increase in the MDS-UPDRS III score. INTERPRETATION These findings provide evidence that the beta oscillopathy does not substantially progress following combined STN DBS plus medication in moderate to advanced Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross W Anderson
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Kevin B Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jordan E Parker
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Psychology, The University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Matthew N Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Yasmine Kehnemouyi
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, Stanford Schools of Engineering & Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Raumin S Neuville
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,The University of California School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Declan Cassini
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Megan H Trager
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Mandy M Koop
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anca Velisar
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Zack Blumenfeld
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Emma J Quinn
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Credit Karma, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jaimie Henderson
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Petrucci MN, Wilkins KB, Orthlieb GC, Kehnemouyi YM, O'Day JJ, Herron JA, Bronte-Stewart HM. Ramp Rate Evaluation and Configuration for Safe and Tolerable Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation. Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng 2021; 2021:959-962. [PMID: 35574294 PMCID: PMC9097241 DOI: 10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is a novel form of therapy that has shown benefit in preliminary studies and may be clinically available in the near future. Initial closed-loop studies have primarily focused on responding to sensed biomarkers with adjustments to stimulation amplitude, which is often perceptible to study participants depending on the slew or "ramp" rate of the amplitude changes. These subjective responses to stimulation ramping can result in transient side effects, illustrating that ramp rate is a unique safety parameter for closed-loop neural systems. This presents a challenge to the future of closed-loop neuromodulation systems: depending on the goal of the control policy, clinicians will need to balance ramp rates to avoid side effects and keep the stimulation therapeutic by responding in time to affect neural dynamics. In this paper, we demonstrate the results of an initial investigation into methodology for finding safe and tolerable ramp rates in four people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Results suggest that optimal ramp rates were found more accurately during varying stimulation when compared to simply toggling between maximal and minimal intensity levels. Additionally, switching frequency instantaneously was tolerable at therapeutic levels of stimulation. Future work should focus on including optimization techniques to find ramp rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew N Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA
| | - Kevin B Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA
| | - Gerrit C Orthlieb
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA
| | - Yasmine M Kehnemouyi
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA
| | - Johanna J O'Day
- Department of Bioengineering at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA
| | - Jeffrey A Herron
- Department of Neurological Surgery at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98104 USA
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kehnemouyi YM, Wilkins KB, Anidi CM, Anderson RW, Afzal MF, Bronte-Stewart HM. Modulation of beta bursts in subthalamic sensorimotor circuits predicts improvement in bradykinesia. Brain 2021; 144:473-486. [PMID: 33301569 PMCID: PMC8240742 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
No biomarker of Parkinson's disease exists that allows clinicians to adjust chronic therapy, either medication or deep brain stimulation, with real-time feedback. Consequently, clinicians rely on time-intensive, empirical, and subjective clinical assessments of motor behaviour and adverse events to adjust therapies. Accumulating evidence suggests that hypokinetic aspects of Parkinson's disease and their improvement with therapy are related to pathological neural activity in the beta band (beta oscillopathy) in the subthalamic nucleus. Additionally, effectiveness of deep brain stimulation may depend on modulation of the dorsolateral sensorimotor region of the subthalamic nucleus, which is the primary site of this beta oscillopathy. Despite the feasibility of utilizing this information to provide integrated, biomarker-driven precise deep brain stimulation, these measures have not been brought together in awake freely moving individuals. We sought to directly test whether stimulation-related improvements in bradykinesia were contingent on reduction of beta power and burst durations, and/or the volume of the sensorimotor subthalamic nucleus that was modulated. We recorded synchronized local field potentials and kinematic data in 16 subthalamic nuclei of individuals with Parkinson's disease chronically implanted with neurostimulators during a repetitive wrist-flexion extension task, while administering randomized different intensities of high frequency stimulation. Increased intensities of deep brain stimulation improved movement velocity and were associated with an intensity-dependent reduction in beta power and mean burst duration, measured during movement. The degree of reduction in this beta oscillopathy was associated with the improvement in movement velocity. Moreover, the reduction in beta power and beta burst durations was dependent on the theoretical degree of tissue modulated in the sensorimotor region of the subthalamic nucleus. Finally, the degree of attenuation of both beta power and beta burst durations, together with the degree of overlap of stimulation with the sensorimotor subthalamic nucleus significantly explained the stimulation-related improvement in movement velocity. The above results provide direct evidence that subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation-related improvements in bradykinesia are related to the reduction in beta oscillopathy within the sensorimotor region. With the advent of sensing neurostimulators, this beta oscillopathy combined with lead location could be used as a marker for real-time feedback to adjust clinical settings or to drive closed-loop deep brain stimulation in freely moving individuals with Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmine M Kehnemouyi
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kevin B Wilkins
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chioma M Anidi
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
- The University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ross W Anderson
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Muhammad Furqan Afzal
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parakkal Unni M, Menon PP, Livi L, Wilson MR, Young WR, Bronte-Stewart HM, Tsaneva-Atanasova K. Data-Driven Prediction of Freezing of Gait Events From Stepping Data. Front Med Technol 2020; 2:581264. [PMID: 35047881 PMCID: PMC8757792 DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2020.581264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FoG) is typically a symptom of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) that negatively influences the quality of life and is often resistant to pharmacological interventions. Novel treatment options that make use of auditory or sensory cues might be optimized by prediction of freezing events. These predictions might help to trigger external sensory cues—shown to improve walking performance—when behavior is changed in a manner indicative of an impending freeze (i.e., when the user needs it the most), rather than delivering cue information continuously. A data-driven approach is proposed for predicting freezing events using Random Forrest (RF), Neural Network (NN), and Naive Bayes (NB) classifiers. Vertical forces, sampled at 100 Hz from a force platform were collected from 9 PD subjects as they stepped in place until they at least had one freezing episode or for 90 s. The F1 scores of RF/NN/NB algorithms were computed for different IL (input to the machine learning algorithm), and GL (how early the freezing event is predicted). A significant negative correlation between the F1 scores and GL, highlighting the difficulty of early detection is found. The IL that maximized the F1 score is approximately equal to 1.13 s. This indicates that the physiological (and therefore neurological) changes leading to freezing take effect at-least one step before the freezing incident. Our algorithm has the potential to support the development of devices to detect and then potentially prevent freezing events in people with Parkinson's which might occur if left uncorrected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Midhun Parakkal Unni
- Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Midhun Parakkal Unni
| | - Prathyush P. Menon
- Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- Departments of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Mark R. Wilson
- Sport & Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - William R. Young
- Sport & Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova
- Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- Department of Bioinformatics and Mathematical Modeling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
O'Day JJ, Kehnemouyi YM, Petrucci MN, Anderson RW, Herron JA, Bronte-Stewart HM. Demonstration of Kinematic-Based Closed-loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Mitigating Freezing of Gait in People with Parkinson's Disease. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2020; 2020:3612-3616. [PMID: 33018784 DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Impaired gait in Parkinson's disease is marked by slow, arrhythmic stepping, and often includes freezing of gait episodes where alternating stepping halts completely. Wearable inertial sensors offer a way to detect these gait changes and novel deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems can respond with clinical therapy in a real-time, closed-loop fashion. In this paper, we present two novel closed-loop DBS algorithms, one using gait arrhythmicity and one using a logistic-regression model of freezing of gait detection as control signals. Benchtop validation results demonstrate the feasibility of running these algorithms in conjunction with a closed-loop DBS system by responding to real-time human subject kinematic data and pre-recorded data from leg-worn inertial sensors from a participant with Parkinson's disease. We also present a novel control policy algorithm that changes neurostimulator frequency in response to the kinematic inputs. These results provide a foundation for further development, iteration, and testing in a clinical trial for the first closed-loop DBS algorithms using kinematic signals to therapeutically improve and understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of gait impairment in Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bronte-Stewart HM, Petrucci MN, O’Day JJ, Afzal MF, Parker JE, Kehnemouyi YM, Wilkins KB, Orthlieb GC, Hoffman SL. Perspective: Evolution of Control Variables and Policies for Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease Using Bidirectional Deep-Brain-Computer Interfaces. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:353. [PMID: 33061899 PMCID: PMC7489234 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A deep brain stimulation system capable of closed-loop neuromodulation is a type of bidirectional deep brain-computer interface (dBCI), in which neural signals are recorded, decoded, and then used as the input commands for neuromodulation at the same site in the brain. The challenge in assuring successful implementation of bidirectional dBCIs in Parkinson's disease (PD) is to discover and decode stable, robust and reliable neural inputs that can be tracked during stimulation, and to optimize neurostimulation patterns and parameters (control policies) for motor behaviors at the brain interface, which are customized to the individual. In this perspective, we will outline the work done in our lab regarding the evolution of the discovery of neural and behavioral control variables relevant to PD, the development of a novel personalized dual-threshold control policy relevant to the individual's therapeutic window and the application of these to investigations of closed-loop STN DBS driven by neural or kinematic inputs, using the first generation of bidirectional dBCIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Matthew N. Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Johanna J. O’Day
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Muhammad Furqan Afzal
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jordan E. Parker
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Yasmine M. Kehnemouyi
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Kevin B. Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Gerrit C. Orthlieb
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Shannon L. Hoffman
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Parker JE, Martinez A, Deutsch GK, Prabhakar V, Lising M, Kapphahn KI, Anidi CM, Neuville R, Coburn M, Shah N, Bronte-Stewart HM. Safety of Plasma Infusions in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord 2020; 35:1905-1913. [PMID: 32633860 PMCID: PMC7361360 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Young plasma infusions have emerged as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative disease, and convalescent plasma therapy has been used safely in the management of viral pandemics. However, the effect of plasma therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) is unknown. Objectives The objective of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of plasma infusions in people with PD. Methods A total of 15 people with clinically established PD, at least 1 cognitive complaint, and on stable therapy received 1 unit of young fresh frozen plasma twice a week for 4 weeks. Assessments and adverse effects were performed/reported on and off therapy at baseline, immediately after, and 4 weeks after the infusions ended. Adverse effects were also assessed during infusions. The primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and feasibility. Exploratory outcomes included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III off medication, neuropsychological battery, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire‐39, inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor‐α, interleukin‐6), uric acid, and quantitative kinematics. Results Adherence rate was 100% with no serious adverse effects. There was evidence of improvement in phonemic fluency (P = 0.002) and in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire‐39 stigma subscore (P = 0.013) that were maintained at the delayed evaluation. Elevated baseline tumor necrosis factor‐α levels decreased 4 weeks after the infusions ended. Conclusions Young fresh frozen plasma was safe, feasible, and well tolerated in people with PD, without serious adverse effects and with preliminary evidence for improvements in phonemic fluency and stigma. The results of this study warrant further therapeutic investigations in PD and provide safety and feasibility data for plasma therapy in people with PD who may be at higher risk for severe complications of COVID‐19. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan E Parker
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Amaris Martinez
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Gayle K Deutsch
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Varsha Prabhakar
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Melanie Lising
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kristopher I Kapphahn
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Chioma M Anidi
- School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Raumin Neuville
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Maria Coburn
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Neil Shah
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Petrucci MN, Neuville RS, Afzal MF, Velisar A, Anidi CM, Anderson RW, Parker JE, O'Day JJ, Wilkins KB, Bronte-Stewart HM. Neural closed-loop deep brain stimulation for freezing of gait. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:1320-1322. [PMID: 32634599 PMCID: PMC8189032 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew N Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Raumin S Neuville
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - M Furqan Afzal
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Anca Velisar
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chioma M Anidi
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ross W Anderson
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jordan E Parker
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Johanna J O'Day
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kevin B Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Petrucci MN, Anderson RW, O'Day JJ, Kehnemouyi YM, Herron JA, Bronte-Stewart HM. A Closed-loop Deep Brain Stimulation Approach for Mitigating Burst Durations in People with Parkinson's Disease. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2020; 2020:3617-3620. [PMID: 33018785 PMCID: PMC8212866 DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Increased beta band synchrony has been demonstrated to be a biomarker of Parkinson's disease (PD). This abnormal synchrony can often be prolonged in long bursts of beta activity, which may interfere with normal sensorimotor processing. Previous closed loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) algorithms used averaged beta power to drive neurostimulation, which were indiscriminate to physiological (short) versus pathological (long) beta burst durations. We present a closed-loop DBS algorithm using beta burst duration as the control signal. Benchtop validation results demonstrate the feasibility of the algorithm in real-time by responding to pre-recorded STN data from a PD participant. These results provide the basis for future improved closed-loop algorithms focused on burst durations for in mitigating symptoms of PD.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ramirez-Zamora A, Giordano J, Boyden ES, Gradinaru V, Gunduz A, Starr PA, Sheth SA, McIntyre CC, Fox MD, Vitek J, Vedam-Mai V, Akbar U, Almeida L, Bronte-Stewart HM, Mayberg HS, Pouratian N, Gittis AH, Singer AC, Creed MC, Lazaro-Munoz G, Richardson M, Rossi MA, Cendejas-Zaragoza L, D'Haese PF, Chiong W, Gilron R, Chizeck H, Ko A, Baker KB, Wagenaar J, Harel N, Deeb W, Foote KD, Okun MS. Proceedings of the Sixth Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank Modulation of Brain Networks and Application of Advanced Neuroimaging, Neurophysiology, and Optogenetics. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:936. [PMID: 31572109 PMCID: PMC6751331 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The annual deep brain stimulation (DBS) Think Tank aims to create an opportunity for a multidisciplinary discussion in the field of neuromodulation to examine developments, opportunities and challenges in the field. The proceedings of the Sixth Annual Think Tank recapitulate progress in applications of neurotechnology, neurophysiology, and emerging techniques for the treatment of a range of psychiatric and neurological conditions including Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, Tourette syndrome, epilepsy, cognitive disorders, and addiction. Each section of this overview provides insight about the understanding of neuromodulation for specific disease and discusses current challenges and future directions. This year’s report addresses key issues in implementing advanced neurophysiological techniques, evolving use of novel modulation techniques to deliver DBS, ans improved neuroimaging techniques. The proceedings also offer insights into the new era of brain network neuromodulation and connectomic DBS to define and target dysfunctional brain networks. The proceedings also focused on innovations in applications and understanding of adaptive DBS (closed-loop systems), the use and applications of optogenetics in the field of neurostimulation and the need to develop databases for DBS indications. Finally, updates on neuroethical, legal, social, and policy issues relevant to DBS research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - James Giordano
- Neuroethics Studies Program, Department of Neurology and Department of Biochemistry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Edward S Boyden
- Media Laboratory, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.,Center for Neurobiological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.,Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Viviana Gradinaru
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Neuroscience and Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Philip A Starr
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Michael D Fox
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jerrold Vitek
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Vinata Vedam-Mai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Umer Akbar
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Aryn H Gittis
- Biological Sciences and Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Annabelle C Singer
- Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Meaghan C Creed
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mark Richardson
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Marvin A Rossi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | | | - Winston Chiong
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ro'ee Gilron
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Howard Chizeck
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andrew Ko
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Kenneth B Baker
- Movement Disorders Program, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Joost Wagenaar
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Noam Harel
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Wissam Deeb
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Afzal MF, Velisar A, Anidi C, Neuville R, Prabhakar V, Bronte-Stewart HM. Abstract #96: Subthalamic Neural Closed-loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Bradykinesia in Parkinson's Disease. Brain Stimul 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
21
|
Anidi C, O'Day JJ, Anderson RW, Afzal MF, Syrkin-Nikolau J, Velisar A, Bronte-Stewart HM. Neuromodulation targets pathological not physiological beta bursts during gait in Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis 2018; 120:107-117. [PMID: 30196050 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 08/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FOG) is a devastating axial motor symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) leading to falls, institutionalization, and even death. The response of FOG to dopaminergic medication and deep brain stimulation (DBS) is complex, variable, and yet to be optimized. Fundamental gaps in the knowledge of the underlying neurobiomechanical mechanisms of FOG render this symptom one of the unsolved challenges in the treatment of PD. Subcortical neural mechanisms of gait impairment and FOG in PD are largely unknown due to the challenge of accessing deep brain circuitry and measuring neural signals in real time in freely-moving subjects. Additionally, there is a lack of gait tasks that reliably elicit FOG. Since FOG is episodic, we hypothesized that dynamic features of subthalamic (STN) beta oscillations, or beta bursts, may contribute to the Freezer phenotype in PD during gait tasks that elicit FOG. We also investigated whether STN DBS at 60 Hz or 140 Hz affected beta burst dynamics and gait impairment differently in Freezers and Non-Freezers. Synchronized STN local field potentials, from an implanted, sensing neurostimulator (Activa® PC + S, Medtronic, Inc.), and gait kinematics were recorded in 12 PD subjects, off-medication during forward walking and stepping-in-place tasks under the following randomly presented conditions: NO, 60 Hz, and 140 Hz DBS. Prolonged movement band beta burst durations differentiated Freezers from Non-Freezers, were a pathological neural feature of FOG and were shortened during DBS which improved gait. Normal gait parameters, accompanied by shorter bursts in Non-Freezers, were unchanged during DBS. The difference between the mean burst duration between hemispheres (STNs) of all individuals strongly correlated with the difference in stride time between their legs but there was no correlation between mean burst duration of each STN and stride time of the contralateral leg, suggesting an interaction between hemispheres influences gait. These results suggest that prolonged STN beta burst durations measured during gait is an important biomarker for FOG and that STN DBS modulated long not short burst durations, thereby acting to restore physiological sensorimotor information processing, while improving gait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chioma Anidi
- Stanford University, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Rm H3136, SUMC, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Johanna J O'Day
- Stanford University, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Rm H3136, SUMC, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Ross W Anderson
- Stanford University, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Rm H3136, SUMC, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Muhammad Furqan Afzal
- Stanford University, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Rm H3136, SUMC, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Judy Syrkin-Nikolau
- Stanford University, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Rm H3136, SUMC, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Anca Velisar
- Stanford University, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Rm H3136, SUMC, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Stanford University, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Rm H3136, SUMC, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Stanford University, Department of Neurosurgery, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ramirez-Zamora A, Giordano JJ, Gunduz A, Brown P, Sanchez JC, Foote KD, Almeida L, Starr PA, Bronte-Stewart HM, Hu W, McIntyre C, Goodman W, Kumsa D, Grill WM, Walker HC, Johnson MD, Vitek JL, Greene D, Rizzuto DS, Song D, Berger TW, Hampson RE, Deadwyler SA, Hochberg LR, Schiff ND, Stypulkowski P, Worrell G, Tiruvadi V, Mayberg HS, Jimenez-Shahed J, Nanda P, Sheth SA, Gross RE, Lempka SF, Li L, Deeb W, Okun MS. Evolving Applications, Technological Challenges and Future Opportunities in Neuromodulation: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank. Front Neurosci 2018; 11:734. [PMID: 29416498 PMCID: PMC5787550 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The annual Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank provides a focal opportunity for a multidisciplinary ensemble of experts in the field of neuromodulation to discuss advancements and forthcoming opportunities and challenges in the field. The proceedings of the fifth Think Tank summarize progress in neuromodulation neurotechnology and techniques for the treatment of a range of neuropsychiatric conditions including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, essential tremor, Tourette syndrome, obsessive compulsive disorder, epilepsy and cognitive, and motor disorders. Each section of this overview of the meeting provides insight to the critical elements of discussion, current challenges, and identified future directions of scientific and technological development and application. The report addresses key issues in developing, and emphasizes major innovations that have occurred during the past year. Specifically, this year's meeting focused on technical developments in DBS, design considerations for DBS electrodes, improved sensors, neuronal signal processing, advancements in development and uses of responsive DBS (closed-loop systems), updates on National Institutes of Health and DARPA DBS programs of the BRAIN initiative, and neuroethical and policy issues arising in and from DBS research and applications in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States,*Correspondence: Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
| | - James J. Giordano
- Department of Neurology, Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Peter Brown
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Justin C. Sanchez
- Biological Technologies Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Arlington, VA, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Departments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Wei Hu
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Cameron McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Wayne Goodman
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States,Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Doe Kumsa
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, White Oak Federal Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Warren M. Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Harrison C. Walker
- Division of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Matthew D. Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Jerrold L. Vitek
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - David Greene
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Daniel S. Rizzuto
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Dong Song
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Theodore W. Berger
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Robert E. Hampson
- Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Sam A. Deadwyler
- Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Leigh R. Hochberg
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States,Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R and D Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States,School of Engineering and Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Nicholas D. Schiff
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuromodulation, Feil Family Brain Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Greg Worrell
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Vineet Tiruvadi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Joohi Jimenez-Shahed
- Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Pranav Nanda
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Neurological Institute, Columbia University Herbert and Florence Irving Medical Center, Colombia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Neurological Institute, Columbia University Herbert and Florence Irving Medical Center, Colombia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Robert E. Gross
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Scott F. Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China,Precision Medicine and Healthcare Research Center, Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China,Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
| | - Wissam Deeb
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Deeb W, Giordano JJ, Rossi PJ, Mogilner AY, Gunduz A, Judy JW, Klassen BT, Butson CR, Van Horne C, Deny D, Dougherty DD, Rowell D, Gerhardt GA, Smith GS, Ponce FA, Walker HC, Bronte-Stewart HM, Mayberg HS, Chizeck HJ, Langevin JP, Volkmann J, Ostrem JL, Shute JB, Jimenez-Shahed J, Foote KD, Wagle Shukla A, Rossi MA, Oh M, Pourfar M, Rosenberg PB, Silburn PA, de Hemptine C, Starr PA, Denison T, Akbar U, Grill WM, Okun MS. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: A Review of Emerging Issues and Technologies. Front Integr Neurosci 2016; 10:38. [PMID: 27920671 PMCID: PMC5119052 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2016.00038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of current progress in the technological advances and the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, as presented by participants of the Fourth Annual DBS Think Tank, which was convened in March 2016 in conjunction with the Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration at the University of Florida, Gainesveille FL, USA. The Think Tank discussions first focused on policy and advocacy in DBS research and clinical practice, formation of registries, and issues involving the use of DBS in the treatment of Tourette Syndrome. Next, advances in the use of neuroimaging and electrochemical markers to enhance DBS specificity were addressed. Updates on ongoing use and developments of DBS for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, Alzheimer's disease, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, obesity, addiction were presented, and progress toward innovation(s) in closed-loop applications were discussed. Each section of these proceedings provides updates and highlights of new information as presented at this year's international Think Tank, with a view toward current and near future advancement of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wissam Deeb
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - James J Giordano
- Department of Neurology, and Neuroethics Studies Program, Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA
| | - Peter J Rossi
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Alon Y Mogilner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuromodulation, New York University Langone Medical Center New York, NY, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jack W Judy
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Christopher R Butson
- Department of Bioengineering, Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Craig Van Horne
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Damiaan Deny
- Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Darin D Dougherty
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Rowell
- Asia Pacific Centre for Neuromodulation, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Greg A Gerhardt
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Gwenn S Smith
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Francisco A Ponce
- Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix Arizona, AZ, USA
| | - Harrison C Walker
- Department of Neurology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Departments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and Neurosurgery, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Howard J Chizeck
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA; NSF Engineering Research Center for Sensorimotor Neural EngineeringSeattle, WA, USA
| | - Jean-Philippe Langevin
- Department of Neurosurgery, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic of Würzburg Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan B Shute
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Kelly D Foote
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Department of Neurological Sciences, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA
| | - Aparna Wagle Shukla
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Marvin A Rossi
- Departments of Neurological Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Oh
- Division of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael Pourfar
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Medical Center New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul B Rosenberg
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter A Silburn
- Asia Pacific Centre for Neuromodulation, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Coralie de Hemptine
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Umer Akbar
- Movement Disorders Program, Department of Neurology, Alpert Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University Providence, RI, USA
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Koop MM, Hill BC, Bronte-Stewart HM. Perceptual errors increase with movement duration and may contribute to hypokinesia in Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience 2013; 243:1-13. [PMID: 23542737 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2012] [Revised: 03/08/2013] [Accepted: 03/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
People with Parkinson's disease (PD) perceive that their movement amplitude is greater than what they actually perform. The neural mechanisms underlying one's perception of movement are believed to involve the sensorimotor integration process (SIP). How PD affects the SIP is not well understood. A previous study interrogating the SIP showed healthy adults (HAs) overestimated their limb position in the direction of movement and the error and its variance (VOE) depended on movement duration. We asked if PDs showed errors in perceived limb position and if the dependence on movement duration was different from HAs. We used an existing computational model of the SIP to explore mechanisms for the error and VOE as a function of movement duration. Twenty PDs, off medication, and 20 age-matched HAs were asked to estimate the position of their hand after performing 50, slow, non-visually guided wrist flexion or extension movements for a random period of time (<4.0 s). Both groups overestimated the amount they moved; however, the PDs' error and VOE were larger (p<0.001). HAs showed increasing error/VOE for small movement durations that reduced/stabilized for longer movement durations. PDs however showed increasing error/VOE with increasing movement duration that did not significantly improve/stabilize. The model suggested that the basis for such perceptual deficits may be abnormal proprioceptive feedback and/or processing of an abnormal internal impression (prediction) that underestimates movement amplitude. Simulation results imply that the PD's SIP could no longer effectively access sensory (proprioceptive) feedback to correct errors in other components of the SIP due to the abnormal processing of sensory feedback. We suggest from this study that an impaired perception of movement amplitude and sensory processing deficits contribute to hypokinesia in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Miller Koop
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, CA 94305-5327, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Shivitz N, Koop MM, Fahimi J, Heit G, Bronte-Stewart HM. Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation improves certain aspects of postural control in Parkinson's disease, whereas medication does not. Mov Disord 2007; 21:1088-97. [PMID: 16671073 DOI: 10.1002/mds.20905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Postural control requires precise integration of sensory inputs and motor output, but clinical assessments of postural control do not differentiate between these. Previously, we found that this differentiation is important in Parkinson's disease (PD) as there was a dissociated effect of medication versus pallidotomy on sensory aspects of postural instability. In this study, we address several questions that emerged from that work in 28 different patients with PD off and on medication, before and after bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (B-STN DBS): (1) In a different cohort is there still an unusually large percentage of patients with postural instability in sensory-deprived conditions? (2) Are more specific measures of motor aspects of postural control using dynamic posturography (postural movement velocity [MV] and reaction time [RT]) abnormal in PD as seen clinically using the Postural Instability and Gait Disorder score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale? (3) What is the effect of B-STN DBS versus medication on sensory versus motor aspects of postural instability in PD? The results included (1) substantially more patients (39%) versus controls (5%) exhibited postural instability in conditions of limited sensory feedback; (2) postural MV and postural RT were abnormal off medication preoperatively (N(subset) = 23; P < 0.001 for both); (3) B-STN DBS improved abnormal sensory aspects of postural instability (P < 0.05) and postural MV (P = 0.005), whereas medication did not. Neither B-STN DBS nor medication improved postural RT. For the group as a whole, STN DBS plus medication was better therapy than medication preoperatively for sensory aspects of postural control (P = 0.003).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Shivitz
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Koop MM, Andrzejewski A, Hill BC, Heit G, Bronte-Stewart HM. Improvement in a quantitative measure of bradykinesia after microelectrode recording in patients with Parkinson's disease during deep brain stimulation surgery. Mov Disord 2006; 21:673-8. [PMID: 16440333 DOI: 10.1002/mds.20796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
It is widely accepted that patients with Parkinson's disease experience immediate but temporary improvement in motor signs after surgical implantation of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulating electrodes before the electrodes are activated, although this has never been formally studied. Based on anecdotal observations that limb mobility improved just after microelectrode recording (MER) during deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures, we designed a prospective study to measure upper extremity bradykinesia using a quantitative measure of angular velocity. Measurements were made pre- and post-MER and during intraoperative DBS. Analysis of 98 STN DBS procedures performed on 61 patients showed that MER did not create adverse clinical symptoms despite concerns that MER increases morbidity. Quantitative upper extremity bradykinesia improved after MER alone, and further improvement was seen during intraoperative DBS. Electrophysiological data from each case were then compared to the improvement in bradykinesia post-MER alone and a significant correlation was found between the improvement in arm bradykinesia, the number of passes through the STN with somatosensory driving, and also with the number of arm cells with somatosensory driving in the STN, but not with total number of passes, total number of passes through the STN, or total number of cells with somatosensory driving in the STN. This study demonstrates that there is a significant improvement in upper extremity bradykinesia just after MER, before inserting or activating the DBS electrode in patients with Parkinson's disease who undergo STN DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy Miller Koop
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, and Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Taylor Tavares AL, Jefferis GSXE, Koop M, Hill BC, Hastie T, Heit G, Bronte-Stewart HM. Quantitative measurements of alternating finger tapping in Parkinson's disease correlate with UPDRS motor disability and reveal the improvement in fine motor control from medication and deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord 2006; 20:1286-98. [PMID: 16001401 DOI: 10.1002/mds.20556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is the primary outcome measure in most clinical trials of Parkinson's disease (PD) therapeutics. Each subscore of the motor section (UPDRS III) compresses a wide range of motor performance into a coarse-grained scale from 0 to 4; the assessment of performance can also be subjective. Quantitative digitography (QDG) is an objective, quantitative assessment of digital motor control using a computer-interfaced musical keyboard. In this study, we show that the kinematics of a repetitive alternating finger-tapping (RAFT) task using QDG correlate with the UPDRS motor score, particularly with the bradykinesia subscore, in 33 patients with PD. We show that dopaminergic medication and an average of 9.5 months of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (B-STN DBS) significantly improve UPDRS and QDG scores but may have different effects on certain kinematic parameters. This study substantiates the use of QDG to measure motor outcome in trials of PD therapeutics and shows that medication and B-STN DBS both improve fine motor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Lisa Taylor Tavares
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5327, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wingeier B, Tcheng T, Koop MM, Hill BC, Heit G, Bronte-Stewart HM. Intra-operative STN DBS attenuates the prominent beta rhythm in the STN in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol 2006; 197:244-51. [PMID: 16289053 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2005] [Revised: 09/12/2005] [Accepted: 09/16/2005] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Power spectra from local field potentials (LFPs) recorded post-operatively from the deep brain stimulation (DBS) macroelectrode show prominence of the beta rhythm (11-30 Hz) in untreated Parkinson's disease (PD). Dopaminergic medication and movement attenuate this beta band in PD. In this pilot study of six sides in four patients, we recorded LFPs from the DBS electrode in untreated PD patients in the operating room. In all cases, there was a peak in the time-frequency spectrogram in the beta frequency range when the patients were at rest, which was associated with attenuation in the same range with movement. The actual frequency range and the strength of the beta peak varied among cases. In two patients, intra-operative constraints permitted recording of LFPs at rest, before and immediately after subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. In both patients we documented that STN DBS caused a significant attenuation in power in the beta band at rest that persisted for 15-25 s after DBS had been turned off (P < 0.01). From one case, our data suggest that the beta rhythm attenuation was most prominent within the STN itself. This study shows for the first time that STN DBS attenuates the power in the prominent beta band recorded in the STN of patients with PD. These pilot findings raise the interesting possibility of using this biomarker for closed loop DBS or neuromodulation.
Collapse
|
30
|
Bronte-Stewart HM, Minn AY, Rodrigues K, Buckley EL, Nashner LM. Postural instability in idiopathic Parkinson's disease: the role of medication and unilateral pallidotomy. Brain 2002; 125:2100-14. [PMID: 12183355 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Postural instability (PI) is common in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD). We measured sensory and motor contributions to PI in 50 patients with advanced IPD, off and on medication and in a subset pre- and 3, 6 and 12 months post-unilateral pallidotomy, using computerized dynamic posturography [specifically, the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) subscale PIGD (Postural Instability and Gait Disorder)]. Off medication, all patients had abnormal PIGD scores. The group could be separated into those with normal SOT equilibrium scores (SOTN) and those, the majority, with abnormal postural control when sensory feedback was limited (SOTABN). Medication improved the PIGD scores but worsened the SOT scores in the majority of patients. Increases in spontaneous sway in some patients contributed to the negative effect of medication on SOT scores. However, this could not explain the detrimental effect of medication on SOT scores in at least 40% of patients. On the other hand, pallidotomy improved both PIGD and SOT scores in both groups. A predictor of good outcome from pallidotomy concerning PI was the degree of worsening of the effect that medication had on SOT5 scores. PI in IPD appears to be multifactorial. We propose that the PIGD score reflects sensory and motor aspects of postural control, with normal sensory feedback, while the SOT equilibrium scores measure the sensory organizational process of postural control in the presence of altered sensory inputs. There is a dissociation between the effects of medication and pallidotomy on motor and sensory components of postural control, which may reflect the underlying pathophysiological mechanism responsible for these different components of PI. We suggest that patients with advanced IPD and PI on medication should consider adjuvant surgical treatment for better postural control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5235, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
1. Concurrent resting and postural tremors of patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease were monitored using transducers responding to angular velocity of rotation. Spectra and correlation functions were calculated for each pair of records. 2. When concurrent tremor spectra share indistinguishable fundamental frequencies, have statistically significant peaks in their coherence spectra at those fundamental frequencies, and show significant peaks in their cross-correlation functions near zero delay, they are classified as linearly dependent. When such tremor records are superimposed, their phase-locked behaviour is evident. 3. Pairs of correlated concurrent tremors, of varying duration, have been observed in both hands, both feet and in either hand and the contralateral or ipsilateral foot. Correlated tremors may be concurrent with other tremors that are independent. We hypothesize that correlated Parkinson tremors arise from one or more common (and possibly unilateral) central sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G P Moore
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
This study introduces a new method for studying, quantitatively, the dynamics of finger movement using data obtained from sequences of key strikes on a computer-interfaced piano keyboard. We have called this quantitative digitography (QDG). This initial article introduces the method in a group of patients with Parkinson's disease and in a group of healthy subjects using simple, repetitive, alternating finger-tapping for 60 seconds. Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) were studied "ON" and "OFF" dopaminergic medication before and after pallidotomy. Customized software allowed the independent analysis of key strike velocity, duration of key strike, and frequency of tapping along with a quantitative measure of the regularity of performance. Quantitative measures of the improvement in performance after medication are presented for each parameter of movement. The technique also reveals correlates of some clinical phenomena of the temporal disturbances of repetitive motion in IPD, such as fatigue, tremor, freezing, and festination. We demonstrate that the performance of 60 seconds of alternating finger tapping on a computerized keyboard yields objective measures of motor performance that are significantly different in patients with IPD "OFF" when compared with "ON" medication and when compared with healthy subjects. This is the first time that such a method has been used in the measurement of specific kinematics of digital motion in Parkinson's disease. The equipment is inexpensive and portable and the data are rapidly and easily collected, making it suitable for the outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, California 94305-5235, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lisberger SG, Pavelko TA, Bronte-Stewart HM, Stone LS. Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. II. Changes in the responses of horizontal gaze velocity Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus. J Neurophysiol 1994; 72:954-73. [PMID: 7983548 DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
1. We made extracellular recordings from Purkinje cells in the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus of awake monkeys before and after motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Three samples were recorded 1) after miniaturizing spectacles had reduced the gain of the VOR (eye speed divided by head speed) to 0.4; 2) when the gain of the VOR was near 1.0; and 3) after magnifying spectacles had increased the gain of the VOR to 1.6. 2. We studied Purkinje cells that showed stronger modulation of simple-spike firing rate during horizontal than during vertical pursuit. These cells corresponded to the previously identified "horizontal gaze velocity Purkinje cells" or HGVP-cells. During pursuit of smooth target motion with the head stationary, HGVP-cells showed strong modulation of firing rate with increases for ipsiversive eye motion (toward the side of recording). When the monkey canceled his VOR by tracking a target that moved exactly with him during sinusoidal head rotation in the horizontal plane, HGVP-cells again showed strong modulation of firing rate with increases for ipsiversive head motion. 3. The responses of HGVP-cells during pursuit with the head stationary and during cancellation of the VOR reveal separate components of firing rate related to eye and head velocity. We used these two behavioral conditions to test for effects of motor learning on the head and eye velocity components of the simple-spike firing of HGVP-cells. Our data confirm the previous observation that motor learning causes the sensitivity to head velocity to be larger when the gain of the VOR is high and smaller when the gain of the VOR is low. Thus we agree with the previous conclusion that changes in the vestibular sensitivity of HGVP-cells, measured during sinusoidal head motion at low frequencies, are in the wrong direction to cause changes in the gain of the VOR. 4. To determine whether the simple-spike output from the HGVP-cells plays a role in the VOR after motor learning, we recorded simple-spike firing during the VOR evoked by transient, rapid changes in head velocity in darkness. When the gain of the VOR was low, firing rate increased during the VOR evoked by ipsiversive head motion and decreased during the VOR evoked by contraversive head motion. When the gain of the VOR was high, the direction selectivity of the responses was reversed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Lisberger
- Department of Physiology, W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco 94143
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|