1
|
Ecker S, Kirisits C, Schmid M, Knoth J, Heilemann G, De Leeuw A, Sturdza A, Kirchheiner K, Jensen N, Nout R, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Pötter R, Spampinato S, Tanderup K, Eder-Nesvacil N. EviGUIDE - a tool for evidence-based decision making in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109748. [PMID: 37330055 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a novel decision-support system for radiation oncology that incorporates clinical, treatment and outcome data, as well as outcome models from a large clinical trial on magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (MR-IGABT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). METHODS A system, called EviGUIDE, was developed that combines dosimetric information from the treatment planning system, patient and treatment characteristics, and established tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, to predict clinical outcome of radiotherapy treatment of LACC. Six Cox Proportional Hazards models based on data from 1341 patients of the EMBRACE-I study have been integrated. One TCP model for local tumor control, and five NTCP models for OAR morbidities. RESULTS EviGUIDE incorporates TCP-NTCP graphs to help users visualize the clinical impact of different treatment plans and provides feedback on achievable doses based on a large reference population. It enables holistic assessment of the interplay between multiple clinical endpoints and tumour and treatment variables. Retrospective analysis of 45 patients treated with MR-IGABT showed that there exists a sub-cohort of patients (20%) with increased risk factors, that could greatly benefit from the quantitative and visual feedback. CONCLUSION A novel digital concept was developed that can enhance clinical decision- making and facilitate personalized treatment. It serves as a proof of concept for a new generation of decision support systems in radiation oncology, which incorporate outcome models and high-quality reference data, and aids the dissemination of evidence-based knowledge about optimal treatment and serve as a blueprint for other sites in radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Ecker
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maximilian Schmid
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Knoth
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerd Heilemann
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Astrid De Leeuw
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nina Jensen
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Remi Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard Pötter
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sofia Spampinato
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmid MP, Lindegaard JC, Mahantshetty U, Tanderup K, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal LU, Sturdza A, Hoskin P, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Huang F, Rai B, Cooper R, van der Steen-Banasik E, Van Limbergen E, Pieters BR, Petric P, Ramazanova D, Ristl R, Kannan S, Hawaldar R, Ecker S, Kirchheiner K, Tan LT, Nout R, Nesvacil N, de Leeuw A, Pötter R, Kirisits C. Risk Factors for Local Failure Following Chemoradiation and Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results From the EMBRACE-I Study. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1933-1942. [PMID: 36599120 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report clinical and treatment characteristics, remission and failure patterns, and risk factors for local failure (LF) from the EMBRACE-I study. MATERIALS AND METHODS EMBRACE-I was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study on magnetic resonance imaging-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (MR-IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy, and MR-IGABT. LF was defined as progressive or recurrent disease in the cervix, uterus, parametria, pelvic wall, or vagina. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate local tumor control (LC) and Cox proportional regression models for multivariable analysis and dose-response analysis. RESULTS One thousand three hundred eighteen patients with a median follow-up of 52 months were available for this analysis. Eighty-one patients had persistent disease 3 months after end of treatment. Of those, 60 patients achieved LC at 6-9 months without further treatment, whereas 21 patients had progressive disease. In addition, 77 patients developed a local recurrence after complete remission comprising a total number of 98 LFs. LFs were located inside the MR-IGABT target volumes in 90% of patients with LF. In multivariable analysis, histology, minimal dose to 90% of high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR), maximum tumor dimension, CTVHR > 45 cm3, overall treatment time, tumor necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis, uterine corpus infiltration at diagnosis and at MR-IGABT, and mesorectal infiltration at MR-IGABT had significant impact on LF. Dose-response analysis showed that a minimal dose to 90% of 85 Gy to the CTVHR led to 95% (95% CI, 94 to 97) LC 3 years postintervention for squamous cell in comparison to 86% (95% CI, 81 to 90) for adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma histology. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates the safety and validity of the GYN GEC-ESTRO/ICRU-89 target concept and provides large-scale evidence for dose prescription and new risk factors for LF in MR-IGABT in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian P Schmid
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Umesh Mahantshetty
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, India
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Lars U Fokdal
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara Segedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Kjersti Bruheim
- The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fleur Huang
- Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Department of Oncology, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Bhavana Rai
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rachel Cooper
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Bradley R Pieters
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Primoz Petric
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dariga Ramazanova
- Medical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robin Ristl
- Medical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, India
| | - Rohini Hawaldar
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, India
| | - Stefan Ecker
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - Li Tee Tan
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Remi Nout
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Nesvacil
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - Astrid de Leeuw
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard Pötter
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gonzalez-Perez V, Rembielak A, Luis Guinot J, Jaberi R, Lancellotta V, Walter R, Zuchora A, Budrukkar A, Kovács G, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Siebert FA, Tagliaferri L. H&N and Skin (HNS) GEC-ESTRO Working Group critical review of recommendations regarding prescription depth, bolus thickness and maximum dose in skin superficial brachytherapy with flaps and customized moulds. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:122-132. [PMID: 36030932 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this publication is the assessment of the existing guidelines for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) superficial brachytherapy (BT) and make a critical review based on the existing literature about the maximum dose prescription depth, bolus thickness and maximum skin surface dose (Dmax) of the published clinical practice. A systematic review of NMSC superficial BT published articles was carried out by the GEC-ESTRO Head & Neck and Skin (HNS) Working Group (WG). 10 members and 2 external reviewers compared the published clinical procedures with the recommendations in the current guidelines and examined the grade of evidence. Our review verified that there is a large variation among centres with regards to clinical practice in superficial BT and identified studies where published parameters such as maximum dose prescription depth, bolus thickness and Dmax exceed the constraints recommended in the guidelines, while showing excellent results in terms of local control, toxicity and cosmesis. This review confirmed that current recommendations on skin superficial BT do not include published experience on tumours treated with superficial BT that require dose prescription depth beyond the recommended 5mm under the skin surface and that the existing literature does not provide sufficient evidence to relate dosimetry of superficial BT to patient reported outcome measures. The GEC-ESTRO HNS WG considers acceptable to prescribe superficial BT dose at a depth above 5mm beyond the skin surface, and modify the bolus thickness to optimize the treatment plan and adjust the acceptable maximum dose on the skin surface, all pending clinical situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Gonzalez-Perez
- Department of Medical Physics, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (F.I.V.O.). Beltran Baguena 8, 46009. Valencia, Spain.
| | - Agata Rembielak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust. 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Jose Luis Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (F.I.V.O.). Beltran Baguena 8, 46009. Valencia, Spain.
| | - Ramin Jaberi
- Radiation Oncology Research Centre (RORC), Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Keshavarz Blvd, Qods Street, 1417863181.Tehran, Iran.
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168. Rome, Italy.
| | - Renate Walter
- Department of Medical Physics. Universitätsklinikum Augsburg. Stenglinstr 2, 86156 Augsburg, Deutschland. Renate.
| | - Anysja Zuchora
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering. University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway H91 YR71, Ireland.
| | - Ashwini Budrukkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital Homi Bhabha National Institute, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel. Mumbai, India 400012.
| | - György Kovács
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Gemelli - Interacts. Rome, Italy.
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht. Lundlaan, 3584. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Frank-André Siebert
- Clinic of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus L, 24105. Kiel, Germany.
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168. Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lindegaard JC, Petric P, Schmid MP, Nesvacil N, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal LU, Sturdza AE, Hoskin P, Mahantshetty U, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Huang F, Rai B, Cooper R, van der Steen-Banasik E, Van Limbergen E, Pieters BR, Tan LT, Nout RA, De Leeuw AAC, Kirchheiner K, Spampinato S, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, Pötter R. Prognostic Implications of Uterine Cervical Cancer Regression During Chemoradiation Evaluated by the T-Score in the Multicenter EMBRACE I Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:379-389. [PMID: 35157992 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A simple scoring system (T-score, TS) for integrating findings from clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the primary tumor at diagnosis has shown strong prognostic capability for predicting local control and survival in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation and MRI-guided brachytherapy (BT). The aim was to validate the performance of TS using the multicenter EMBRACE I study and to evaluate the prognostic implications of TS regression obtained during initial chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS EMBRACE I recruited 1416 patients, of whom 1318 were available for TS. Patients were treated with chemoradiation followed by MRI-guided BT. A ranked ordinal scale of 0 to 3 points was used to assess 8 anatomic locations typical for local invasion of cervical cancer. TS was calculated separately at diagnosis (TSD) and at BT (TSBT) by the sum of points obtained from the 8 locations at the 2 occasions. RESULTS Median TSD and TSBT was 5 and 4, respectively. TS regression was observed in 71% and was an explanatory variable for BT technique (intracavitary vs intracavitary/interstitial) and major dose-volume histogram parameters for BT, such as high-risk clinical target (CTVHR), CTVHR D90 (minimal dose to 90% of the target volume), D2cm3 bladder (minimal dose to the most exposed 2 cm3 of the bladder), and D2cm3 rectum. TS regression (TSBT≤5) was associated with improved local control and survival and with less morbidity compared with patients with TSBT remaining high (>5) despite initial chemoradiation. TS regression was significant in multivariate analysis for both local control and survival when analyzed in consort with already established prognostic parameters related to the patient, disease, and treatment. CONCLUSIONS TS was validated in a multicenter setting and proven to be a strong multidisciplinary platform for integration of clinical findings and imaging with the ability to quantitate local tumor regression and its prognostic implications regarding BT technique, dose-volume histogram parameters, local control, survival, and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Primoz Petric
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian Paul Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nicole Nesvacil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Alina Emiliana Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Umesh Mahantshetty
- Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, (A Unit of Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai), India
| | - Barbara Segedin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Kjersti Bruheim
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fleur Huang
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bhavana Rai
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rachel Cooper
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Bradley Rumwell Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Li-Tee Tan
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sofia Spampinato
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spampinato S, Tanderup K, Nout R, Smet S, Lindegaard J, Fokdal L, Pötter R, Sturdza A, Segedin B, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Bruheim K, Mahantshetty U, Chargari C, Rai B, Cooper R, van der Steen-Banasik E, Sundset M, Wiebe E, Villafranca E, Van Limbergen E, Chopra S, Kirchheiner K. OC-0588 Impact of persistent symptoms on long-term quality of life of cervical cancer survivors in EMBRACE I. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02610-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
6
|
Portelance L, Corradini S, Erickson B, Lalondrelle S, Padgett K, van der Leij F, van Lier A, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. Online Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy (oMRgRT) for Gynecological Cancers. Front Oncol 2021; 11:628131. [PMID: 34513656 PMCID: PMC8429611 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is increasingly being used in gynecological cancer management. RT delivered with curative or palliative intent can be administered alone or combined with chemotherapy or surgery. Advanced treatment planning and delivery techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, including volumetric modulated arc therapy, and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy allow for highly conformal radiation dose delivery leading to improved tumor control rates and less treatment toxicity. Quality on-board imaging that provides accurate visualization of target and surrounding organs at risk is a critical feature of these advanced techniques. As soft tissue contrast resolution is superior with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to other imaging modalities, MRI has been used increasingly to delineate tumor from adjacent soft tissues and organs at risk from initial diagnosis to tumor response evaluation. Gynecological cancers often have poor contrast resolution compared to the surrounding tissues on computed tomography scan, and consequently the benefit of MRI is high. One example is in management of locally advanced cervix cancer where adaptive MRI guidance has been broadly implemented for adaptive brachytherapy. The role of MRI for external beam RT is also steadily increasing. MRI information is being used for treatment planning, predicting, and monitoring position shifts and accounting for tissue deformation and target regression during treatment. The recent clinical introduction of online MRI-guided radiation therapy (oMRgRT) could be the next step in high-precision RT. This technology provides a tool to take full advantage of MRI not only at the time of initial treatment planning but as well as for daily position verification and online plan adaptation. Cervical, endometrial, vaginal, and oligometastatic ovarian cancers are being treated on MRI linear accelerator systems throughout the world. This review summarizes the current state, early experience, ongoing trials, and future directions of oMRgRT in the management of gynecological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine Portelance
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Beth Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Susan Lalondrelle
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kyle Padgett
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Femke van der Leij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Lier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Werensteijn-Honingh A, Wevers A, Peters M, Kroon P, Intven M, Eppinga W, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. PD-0745 Outcomes & predictors of progression: SBRT for lymph node oligorecurrent prostate cancer on PSMA-PET. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07024-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
8
|
Sturdza A, Stephanides M, Eriksen J, Benstead K, Hoskin P, Vlad S, Escande A, Corradini S, Konrad S, Westerveld H, Tagliaferri L, Najjari D, Konat-Bąska K, Plesinac Karapandzic V, Tan L, Nout R, Peters B, Tanderup K, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Kamrava M. PO-1487 Brachytherapy training survey among Radiation Oncology residents in Europe. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07938-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
9
|
Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Azria D, Bohoudi O, Boldrini L, Bruynzeel A, Hörner-Rieber J, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Lagerwaard F, McNair H, Raaymakers B, Schytte T, Tree A, Valentini V, Wilke L, Zips D, Belka C. ESTRO-ACROP recommendations on the clinical implementation of hybrid MR-linac systems in radiation oncology. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:146-154. [PMID: 33775715 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) represents one of the most innovative applications of current image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). The revolutionary concept of oMRgRT systems is the ability to acquire MR images for adaptive treatment planning and also online imaging during treatment delivery. The daily adaptive planning strategies allow to improve targeting accuracy while avoiding critical structures. This ESTRO-ACROP recommendation aims to provide an overview of available systems and guidance for best practice in the implementation phase of hybrid MR-linac systems. Unlike the implementation of other radiotherapy techniques, oMRgRT adds the MR environment to the daily practice of radiotherapy, which might be a new experience for many centers. New issues and challenges that need to be thoroughly explored before starting clinical treatments will be highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Azria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1194, France
| | - Omar Bohoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location de Boelelaan, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location de Boelelaan, The Netherlands
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Frank Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location de Boelelaan, The Netherlands
| | - Helen McNair
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bas Raaymakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alison Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Lotte Wilke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pötter R, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. SP-0003 EMBR ACE experience. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06461-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
11
|
Pötter R, Tanderup K, Schmid MP, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal LU, Sturdza AE, Hoskin P, Mahantshetty U, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Huang F, Rai B, Cooper R, van der Steen-Banasik E, Van Limbergen E, Pieters BR, Tan LT, Nout RA, De Leeuw AAC, Ristl R, Petric P, Nesvacil N, Kirchheiner K, Kirisits C, Lindegaard JC. MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:538-547. [PMID: 33794207 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30753-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of the use of MRI for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer was introduced 20 years ago. Here, we report on EMBRACE-I, which aimed to evaluate local tumour control and morbidity after chemoradiotherapy and MRI-based IGABT. METHODS EMBRACE-I was a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study. Data from patients from 24 centres in Europe, Asia, and North America were prospectively collected. The inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years, with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix, The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB-IVA disease or FIGO stage IVB disease restricted to paraaortic lymph metastasis below the L1-L2 interspace, suitable for curative treatment. Treatment consisted of chemoradiotherapy (weekly intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m2, 5-6 cycles, 1 day per cycle, plus 45-50 Gy external-beam radiotherapy delivered in 1·8-2 Gy fractions) followed by MRI-based IGABT. The MRI-based IGABT target volume definition and dose reporting was according to Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie European Society for Radiation Oncology recommendations. IGABT dose prescription was open according to institutional practice. Local control and late morbidity were selected as primary endpoints in all patients available for analysis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00920920. FINDINGS Patient accrual began on July 30, 2008, and closed on Dec 29, 2015. A total of 1416 patients were registered in the database. After exclusion for not meeting patient selection criteria before treatment, being registered but not entered in the database, meeting the exclusion criteria, and being falsely excluded, data from 1341 patients were available for analysis of disease and data from 1251 patients were available for assessment of morbidity outcome. MRI-based IGABT including dose optimisation was done in 1317 (98·2%) of 1341 patients. Median high-risk clinical target volume was 28 cm3 (IQR 20-40) and median minimal dose to 90% of the clinical target volume (D90%) was 90 Gy (IQR 85-94) equi-effective dose in 2 Gy per fraction. At a median follow-up of 51 months (IQR 20-64), actuarial overall 5-year local control was 92% (95% CI 90-93). Actuarial cumulative 5-year incidence of grade 3-5 morbidity was 6·8% (95% CI 5·4-8·6) for genitourinary events, 8·5% (6·9-10·6) for gastrointestinal events, 5·7% (4·3-7·6) for vaginal events, and 3·2% (2·2-4·5) for fistulae. INTERPRETATION Chemoradiotherapy and MRI-based IGABT result in effective and stable long-term local control across all stages of locally advanced cervical cancer, with a limited severe morbidity per organ. These results represent a positive breakthrough in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, which might be used as a benchmark for clinical practice and all future studies. FUNDING Medical University of Vienna, Aarhus University Hospital, Elekta AB, and Varian Medical Systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maximilian Paul Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Alina Emiliana Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Hospital, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, London, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Barbara Segedin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Kjersti Bruheim
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fleur Huang
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Bhavana Rai
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rachel Cooper
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Bradley Rumwell Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Li-Tee Tan
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Remi Abubakar Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Robin Ristl
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Primoz Petric
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nicole Nesvacil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chopra S, Mangaj A, Sharma A, Tan LT, Sturdza A, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Han K, Huang F, Schmid MP, Fokdal L, Chargari C, Diendorfer T, Tanderup K, Potter R, Nout RA. Management of oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervical cancer: A pattern of care survey within the EMBRACE research network. Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:151-159. [PMID: 33144247 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer, systemic chemotherapy constitutes the main treatment. Though there is an increasing use of high dose external radiation and brachytherapy in the metastatic setting, no consensus exists. METHODS A 17-item survey was designed with additional case-based questions to explore present management of oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervix cancer within EMBRACE research group participating sites. The questions were designed to elicit prevailing practices in the management of de-novo oligo-metastasis and oligo-recurrent setting after completing the primary treatment of cervix cancer. The survey was sent electronically with two rounds of email reminders to respond over a 2-week survey period. The online survey was designed such that it was mandatory to complete all questions. The responses were recorded and results were summarized as proportions and summary statistics were generated. RESULTS Twenty-two centers responded to this survey. A majority (90%) of respondents reported a low incidence of de-novo oligo-metastatic cervical cancer in their practice (<5%), with a higher proportion of patients with oligo-recurrence after completing primary treatment (5-10%). All responding sites preferred to treat pelvic disease in the de-novo oligo-metastatic setting albeit with different fractionation regimens. While 68.2% of respondents recommended chemo-radiation and brachytherapy, 31.8% considered additional systemic therapy. Overall 77.3% centers recommended the use of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy to oligo-metastasis. For out-of-field nodal recurrences, 63.7% of respondents considered treating with curative intent, while 59% preferred treating in-field recurrence with palliative intent. A vast majority of the participating centers (90%) have stereotactic radiation therapy capacity and would consider a clinical trial addressing oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervical cancer. CONCLUSION Although contemporary practice is variable, a substantial proportion of EMBRACE centers consider high dose radiation in de-novo metastatic and oligo-recurrence settings. However, there is clear need for a joint clinical protocol and prospective studies to address the role of high dose radiation within oligo-recurrent and oligo-metastatic scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Chopra
- Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India.
| | - Akshay Mangaj
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Alisha Sharma
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Li Tee Tan
- Cambridge University Addenbrooke's Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Medical University/General Hospital of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austria
| | | | - Kathy Han
- University of Toronto Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Fleur Huang
- Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Department of Oncology, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Maximilian P Schmid
- Medical University/General Hospital of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austria
| | - Lars Fokdal
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Tamara Diendorfer
- Medical University/General Hospital of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austria
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Richard Potter
- Medical University/General Hospital of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austria
| | - Remi A Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schmid M, Kirisits C, Tanderup K, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal L, Sturdza A, Hoskin P, Mahantshetty U, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Huang F, Rai B, Cooper R, Van der Steen-Banasik E, Van Limbergen E, Pieters B, Tan L, Nout R, De Leeuw A, Nesvacil N, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Lindegaard J, Pötter R. OC-1051: Local failure in cervical cancer patients after MR image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01988-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
14
|
Pötter R, Tanderup K, Schmid M, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal L, Sturdza A, Hoskin P, Mahantshetty U, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Huang F, Rai B, Cooper R, Van der Steen-Banasik E, Van Limbergen E, Pieters B, Tan L, Nout R, De Leeuw A, Nesvacil N, Kirchheiner K, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Kirisits C, Lindegaard J, Embrace C. OC-0437: MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: overall results of EMBRACE I. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00459-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
15
|
Smet S, Tanderup K, Nout R, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Spampinato S, Chargari C, Lindegaard J, Mahantshetty U, Strudza A, Schmid M, Hoskin P, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Rai B, Huang F, Van Der Steen-Basanik E, Cooper R, Van Limbergen E, Sundset M, Pötter R, Kirchheiner K. OC-0317: Risk factors for persistent late fatigue after radiochemotherapy in cervical cancer (EMBRACE study). Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00341-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
Peters M, De Leeuw A, Pötter R, Nomden C, Tanderup K, Kirchheiner K, Schmid M, Fortin I, Haie-Meder C, Lindegaard J, Sturdza A, Mahantshetty U, Hoskin P, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Rai B, Huang F, Cooper R, Van der Steen-Banasik E, Van Limbergen E, Nout R, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. OC-0566: Risk factors for nodal failure in the EMBRACE study cohort. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00588-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
17
|
Hes J, Van Lier A, De Leeuw A, Den Hartogh M, Kroon P, De Groot-van Breugel E, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. OC-0713: MR-linac boosts for patients with cervix cancer ineligible for brachytherapy; preliminary experience. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00735-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
18
|
Tanderup K, Nesvacil N, Kirchheiner K, Serban M, Spampinato S, Jensen NBK, Schmid M, Smet S, Westerveld H, Ecker S, Mahantshetty U, Swamidas J, Chopra S, Nout R, Tan LT, Fokdal L, Sturdza A, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, de Leeuw A, Lindegaard JC, Kirisits C, Pötter R. Evidence-Based Dose Planning Aims and Dose Prescription in Image-Guided Brachytherapy Combined With Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2020; 30:311-327. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
19
|
Serban M, Kirisits C, de Leeuw A, Pötter R, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Nesvacil N, Swamidas J, Hudej R, Lowe G, Hellebust TP, Menon G, Oinam A, Bownes P, Oosterveld B, De Brabandere M, Koedooder K, Langeland Marthinsen AB, Whitney D, Lindegaard J, Tanderup K. Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:1052-1062. [PMID: 32007365 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of brachytherapy technique and applicator type on target dose, isodose surface volumes, and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS Nine hundred two patients treated with tandem/ovoids (T&O) (n = 299) and tandem/ring (T&R) (n = 603) applicators from 16 EMBRACE centers were analyzed. Patients received external beam radiation therapy and magnetic resonance imaging guided brachytherapy with dose prescription according to departmental practice. Centers were divided into 4 groups, according to applicator/technique: Ovoids and ring centers treating mainly with the intracavitary (IC) technique and ovoids and ring centers treating routinely with the intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) technique. V85Gy EQD210, CTVHR D90% (EQD210), and bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and vaginal 5-mm lateral-point doses (EQD23) were evaluated among center groups. Differences between T&O and T&R were tested with multivariable analysis. RESULTS For similar point A doses, mean CTVHR D90% was 3.3 Gy higher and V85Gy was 23% lower for ring-IC compared with ovoids-IC centers (at median target volumes). Mean bladder/rectum doses (D2cm3 and ICRU-point) were 3.2 to 7.7 Gy smaller and vaginal 5-mm lateral-point was 19.6 Gy higher for ring-IC centers. Routine use of IC/IS technique resulted in increased target dose, whereas V85Gy was stable (T&R) or decreased (T&O); reduced bladder and rectum D2cm3 and bladder ICRU-point by 3.5 to 5.0 Gy for ovoids centers; and similar OAR doses for ring centers. CTVHR D90% was 2.8 Gy higher, bladder D2cm3 4.3 Gy lower, rectovaginal ICRU-point 4.8 Gy lower, and vagina 5-mm lateral-point 22.4 Gy higher for ring-IC/IS versus ovoids-IC/IS centers. The P values were <.002 for all comparisons. Equivalently, significant differences were derived from the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS T&R-IC applicators have better target dose and dose conformity than T&O-IC in this representative patient cohort. IC applicators fail to cover large target volumes, whereas routine application of IC/IS improves target and OAR dose considerably. Patients treated with T&R show a more favorable therapeutic ratio when evaluating target, bladder/rectum doses, and V85Gy. A comprehensive view on technique/applicators should furthermore include practical considerations and clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Serban
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Astrid de Leeuw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Nicole Nesvacil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jamema Swamidas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Robert Hudej
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gerry Lowe
- Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Taran Paulsen Hellebust
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital - The Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geetha Menon
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Arun Oinam
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Peter Bownes
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Kees Koedooder
- Department of Radiation Oncology Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Diane Whitney
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jacob Lindegaard
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Berger T, Seppenwoolde Y, Pötter R, Assenholt MS, Lindegaard JC, Nout RA, de Leeuw A, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Tan LT, Georg D, Kirisits C, Dumas I, Nesvacil N, Swamidas J, Hudej R, Lowe G, Hellebust TP, Menon G, Fokdal L, Tanderup K. Importance of Technique, Target Selection, Contouring, Dose Prescription, and Dose-Planning in External Beam Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Evolution of Practice From EMBRACE-I to II. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:885-894. [PMID: 30904706 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the evolution of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) from EMBRACE-I (general guidelines for EBRT) to the initial phase of the EMBRACE-II study (detailed protocol for EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS EMBRACE-I enrolled 1416 locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation including image-guided adaptive brachytherapy during 2008 to 2015. From March 2016 until March 2018, 153 patients were enrolled in the ongoing EMBRACE-II study, which involves a comprehensive detailed strategy and accreditation procedure for EBRT target contouring, treatment planning, and image guidance. EBRT planning target volumes (PTVs), treated volumes (V43 Gy), and conformity index (CI; V43 Gy/PTV) were evaluated in both studies and compared. RESULTS For EMBRACE-I, conformal radiation therapy (60% of patients) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT; 40%) was applied with 45 to 50 Gy over 25 to 30 fractions to the elective clinical target volume (CTV). For pelvic CTVs (82%), median PTV and V43 Gy volumes were 1549 and 2390 mL, respectively, and CI was 1.54. For pelvic plus paraortic nodal (PAN) CTVs (15%), median PTV and V43 Gy volumes were 1921 and 2895 mL, and CI was 1.51. For pelvic CTVs treated with 45 to 46 Gy, the use of conformal radiation therapy was associated with a median V43 Gy volume that was 546 mL larger than with IMRT/VMAT. For pelvic CTVs treated with IMRT, the use of a dose prescription ≥48 Gy was associated with a median V43 Gy volumes that was 428 mL larger than with a dose prescription of 45 to 46 Gy. For EMBRACE-II, all patients were treated with: IMRT/VMAT, daily IGRT, 45 Gy over 25 fractions for the elective CTV, and simultaneously integrated boost for pathologic lymph nodes. For pelvic CTVs (61%), median PTV and V43 Gy volumes were 1388 and 1418 mL, and CI was 1.02. For pelvic plus PAN CTVs (32%), median PTV and V43 Gy volumes were 1720 and 1765 mL, and CI was 1.03. From EMBRACE-I to initial II, median V43 Gy was decreased by 972 mL (41%) and 1130 mL (39%), and median CI decreased from 1.54 to 1.02 and 1.51 to 1.03 for pelvic and pelvic plus PAN irradiation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Application of IMRT/VMAT, IGRT, and a 45-Gy dose provides the potential of higher conformality inducing significant reduction of treated volume. Adherence to a detailed protocol including comprehensive accreditation, as in EMBRACE-II, reduces considerably V43 Gy and V50 Gy and improves conformality and interinstitutional consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Berger
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Yvette Seppenwoolde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid de Leeuw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Li Tee Tan
- Departments of Oncology, Radiology and Gynae-oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Isabelle Dumas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Nicole Nesvacil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Jamema Swamidas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Robert Hudej
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gerry Lowe
- Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Taran Paulsen Hellebust
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geetha Menon
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Lars Fokdal
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tan LT, Pötter R, Sturdza A, Fokdal L, Haie-Meder C, Schmid M, Gregory D, Petric P, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Gillham C, Van Limbergen E, Hoskin P, Tharavichitkul E, Villafranca E, Mahantshetty U, Kirisits C, Lindegaard J, Kirchheiner K, Tanderup K. Change in Patterns of Failure After Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: Analysis From the RetroEMBRACE Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:895-902. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
22
|
Knoth J, Pötter R, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal L, Sturdza A, Hoskin P, Mahantshetty U, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Wiebe E, Rai B, Cooper R, van der Steen-Banasik E, van Limbergen E, Pieters B, Sundset M, Tan LT, Nout R, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, Nesvacil N, Lindegaard JC, Schmid M. Stage Migration between Clinical Examination and MRI in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Brachytherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. SP-0052 Heterogeneous dose adapted to treatment response during radiotherapy: clinical experience from cervix cancer IGABT. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30472-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
24
|
Wortman B, Astreinidou E, Laman M, Lutgens L, Van der Steen-Banasik E, Slot A, Westerveld H, De Winter K, Van den Berg H, Bloemers M, Stam T, Mens J, Zwanenburg L, Bijmolt S, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Snyers A, Creutzberg C, Nout R. OC-0394 Brachytherapy quality assurance in the PORTEC-4a trial for high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30814-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
25
|
Knoth J, Pötter R, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal L, Sturdza A, Hoskin P, Mahantshetty U, Segedin B, Bruheim K, Wiebe E, Rai B, Cooper R, Van der Steen-Banasik E, Van Limbergen E, Pieters B, Sundset M, Tan L, Nout R, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, Nesvacil N, Lindegaard J, Schmid M. PO-0827 Comparison of clinical examination and MRI for local cervical cancer staging (FIGO and T(NM)). Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)31247-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
26
|
Nesvacil N, Tanderup K, Pötter R, Seppenwoolde Y, De Leeuw A, Swamidas J, Dumas I, Hudej R, Lowe G, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Lindegaard J, Kirisits C. PV-0260: On the implementation of IGBT for cervix cancer in the observational multicenter study EMBRACE. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30570-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
27
|
Fokdal L, Tanderup K, Pötter R, Kirchheiner K, Sturdza A, Chargari C, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Segedin B, Tan L, Hoskin P, Mahantshetty U, Bruheim K, Rai B, Kirisits C, Lindegaard J. OC-0072: Risk factors for ureteral stricture after IGABT in cervical cancer: results from the EMBRACE studies. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30382-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
28
|
Pötter R, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, de Leeuw A, Kirchheiner K, Nout R, Tan LT, Haie-Meder C, Mahantshetty U, Segedin B, Hoskin P, Bruheim K, Rai B, Huang F, Van Limbergen E, Schmid M, Nesvacil N, Sturdza A, Fokdal L, Jensen NBK, Georg D, Assenholt M, Seppenwoolde Y, Nomden C, Fortin I, Chopra S, van der Heide U, Rumpold T, Lindegaard JC, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. The EMBRACE II study: The outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 9:48-60. [PMID: 29594251 PMCID: PMC5862686 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 391] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The publication of the GEC-ESTRO recommendations one decade ago was a significant step forward for reaching international consensus on adaptive target definition and dose reporting in image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Since then, IGABT has been spreading, particularly in Europe, North America and Asia, and the guidelines have proved their broad acceptance and applicability in clinical practice. However, a unified approach to volume contouring and reporting does not imply a unified administration of treatment, and currently both external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and IGABT are delivered using a large variety of techniques and prescription/fractionation schedules. With IGABT, local control is excellent in limited and well-responding tumours. The major challenges are currently loco-regional control in advanced tumours, treatment-related morbidity, and distant metastatic disease. Emerging evidence from the RetroEMBRACE and EMBRACE I studies has demonstrated that clinical outcome is related to dose prescription and technique. The next logical step is to demonstrate excellent clinical outcome with the most advanced EBRT and brachytherapy techniques based on an evidence-based prospective dose and volume prescription protocol. The EMBRACE II study is an interventional and observational multicentre study which aims to benchmark a high level of local, nodal and systemic control while limiting morbidity, using state of the art treatment including an advanced target volume selection and contouring protocol for EBRT and brachytherapy, a multi-parametric brachytherapy dose prescription protocol (clinical validation of dose constraints), and use of advanced EBRT (IMRT and IGRT) and brachytherapy (IC/IS) techniques (clinical validation). The study also incorporates translational research including imaging and tissue biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Astrid de Leeuw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Remi Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Li Tee Tan
- Departments of Oncology, Radiology and Gynae-oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Barbara Segedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, United Kingdom
| | - Kjersti Bruheim
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bhavana Rai
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Fleur Huang
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Max Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Nicole Nesvacil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Lars Fokdal
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Yvette Seppenwoolde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Christel Nomden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Israel Fortin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Uulke van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tamara Rumpold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Andreychenko A, Kroon PS, Maspero M, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, De Leeuw AAC, Lam MGEH, Lagendijk JJW, van den Berg CAT. The feasibility of semi-automatically generated red bone marrow segmentations based on MR-only for patients with gynecologic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2017; 123:164-168. [PMID: 28238449 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For patients with cervical cancer the delivery of chemotherapy with radiotherapy improves survival compared with radiotherapy alone. However, high rates of acute hematologic toxicity occur when combining both therapies due to the damage of the red bone marrow (RBM). This study aimed to reduce the radiation damage to the RBM. A tool has been developed for semi-automatic delineation of the red bone marrow based on MR-only. This delineation can be included into the treatment planning process to reduce the volume of RBM irradiated in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy. METHODS 13 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled. All the patients underwent MR, CT and FDG-PET imaging. A tool for RBM determination from water and fat MR images was developed. Our MR-based RBM tool was optimized and validated with the FDG-PET scans of the patients. RESULTS Our tool identified RBM regions in the pelvic area. The mean total volume of these regions was 34% of the pelvic bone marrow. The corresponding SUV values based on the FDG-PET scans were above the reported threshold of active/red bone marrow. CONCLUSION This study shows that delineations of the RBM for the radiotherapy with RBM sparing can be generated semi-automatically using MR scans only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Andreychenko
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Petra S Kroon
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matteo Maspero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A C De Leeuw
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J W Lagendijk
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis A T van den Berg
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC, Kirisits C, Haie-Meder C, Kirchheiner K, de Leeuw A, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Van Limbergen E, Pötter R. Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy in cervix cancer: A new paradigm changing clinical practice and outcome. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120:365-369. [PMID: 27555228 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Tanderup
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Denmark
| | | | - Christian Kirisits
- Medical University of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Austria
| | - Christine Haie-Meder
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Department of Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France
| | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Medical University of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Austria
| | - Astrid de Leeuw
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | | | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Richard Pötter
- Medical University of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tanderup K, Fokdal LU, Sturdza A, Haie-Meder C, Mazeron R, van Limbergen E, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Petric P, Hoskin P, Dörr W, Bentzen SM, Kirisits C, Lindegaard JC, Pötter R. Effect of tumor dose, volume and overall treatment time on local control after radiochemotherapy including MRI guided brachytherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120:441-446. [PMID: 27350396 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 226] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2016] [Revised: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Currently, there is no consensus on dose prescription in image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence based recommendations for tumor dose prescription based on results from a multi-center patient series (retroEMBRACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study analyzed 488 locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy±chemotherapy combined with IGABT. Brachytherapy contouring and reporting was according to ICRU/GEC-ESTRO recommendations. The Cox Proportional Hazards model was applied to analyze the effect on local control of dose-volume metrics as well as overall treatment time (OTT), dose rate, chemotherapy, and tumor histology. RESULTS With a median follow up of 46months, 43 local failures were observed. Dose (D90) to the High Risk Clinical Target Volume (CTVHR) (p=0.022, HR=0.967 per Gy) was significant for local control, whereas increasing CTVHR volume (p=0.004, HR=1.017 per cm3), and longer OTT (p=0.004, HR=1.023 per day) were associated with worse local control. Histology (p=0.084), chemotherapy (p=0.49) and dose rate (p=1.00) did not have significant impact on local control. Separate analyses according to stage of disease showed that dose to CTVHR, residual gross tumor volume (GTVres), and Intermediate Risk CTV (CTVIR) has significant impact on local control. CONCLUSION CTVHR dose of ⩾85Gy (D90) delivered in 7weeks provides 3-year local control rates of >94% in limited size CTVHR (20cm3), >93% in intermediate size (30cm3) and >86% in large size (70cm3) CTVHR. CTVIR and GTVres dose of ⩾60Gy and ⩾95Gy (D98) leads to similar local control. A dose of 5Gy (CTVHR) is required to compensate an increase of OTT by one week. Increased CTVHR volume by 10cm3 requires additional 5Gy for equivalent local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | | | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Christine Haie-Meder
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France
| | - Renaud Mazeron
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France
| | - Erik van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Primoz Petric
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Doha, Qatar; Division of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Wolfgang Dörr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Greenebaum Cancer Center and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mohamed S, Lindegaard JC, de Leeuw AAC, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Kirchheiner K, Kirisits C, Pötter R, Tanderup K. Vaginal dose de-escalation in image guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120:480-485. [PMID: 27267048 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Revised: 05/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vaginal stenosis is a major problem following radiotherapy in cervical cancer. We investigated a new dose planning strategy for vaginal dose de-escalation (VDD). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty consecutive locally advanced cervical cancer patients without lower or middle vaginal involvement at diagnosis from 3 institutions were analysed. External beam radiotherapy was combined with MRI-guided brachytherapy. VDD was obtained by decreasing dwell times in ovoid/ring and increasing dwell times in tandem/needles. The aim was to maintain the target dose (D90 of HR-CTV⩾85Gy EQD2) while reducing the dose to the surface of the vagina to <140% of the physical fractional brachytherapy dose corresponding to a total EQD2 of 85Gy. RESULTS The mean vaginal loading (ovoid/ring) was reduced from 51% to 33% of the total loading with VDD, which significantly reduced the dose to the vaginal dose points (p<0.001) without compromising the target dose. The dose to the ICRU recto-vaginal point was reduced by a mean of 4±4Gy EQD2 (p<0.001), while doses to bladder and rectum (D2cm3) were reduced by 2±2Gy and 3±2Gy, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS VDD significantly reduces dose to the upper vagina which is expected to result in reduction of vaginal stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Mohamed
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Radiotherapy, NCI, Cairo University, Egypt.
| | | | - Astrid A C de Leeuw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fortin I, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Mahantshetty U, Haie-Meder C, Hoskin P, Segedin B, Kirisits C, Tanderup K, Lindegaard J, Kirchheiner K, Pötter R. Distant Metastases in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Pattern of Relapse and Prognostic Factors: Early Results From the EMBRACE Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
34
|
Kirisits C, Federico M, Nkiwane K, Fidarova E, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, de Leeuw A, Lindegaard J, Pötter R, Tanderup K. Quality assurance in MR image guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Final results of the EMBRACE study dummy run. Radiother Oncol 2015; 117:548-54. [PMID: 26316396 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Revised: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 08/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Upfront quality assurance (QA) is considered essential when starting a multicenter clinical trial in radiotherapy. Despite the long experience gained for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) trials, there are only limited audit QA methods for brachytherapy (BT) and none include the specific aspects of image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT). METHODS AND MATERIALS EMBRACE is a prospective multicenter trial aiming to assess the impact of (MRI)-based IGABT in locally advanced cervical cancer. An EMBRACE dummy run was designed to identify sources and magnitude of uncertainties and errors considered important for the evaluation of clinical, and dosimetric parameters and their relation to outcome. Contouring, treatment planning and dose reporting was evaluated and scored with a categorical scale of 1-10. Active feedback to centers was provided to improve protocol compliance and reporting. A second dummy run was required in case of major deviations (score <7) for any item. RESULTS Overall 27/30 centers passed the dummy run. 16 centers had to repeat the dummy run in order to clarify major inconsistencies to the protocol. The most pronounced variations were related to contouring for both EBRT and BT. Centers with experience in IGABT (>30 cases) had better performance as compared to centers with limited experience. CONCLUSION The comprehensive dummy run designed for the EMBRACE trial has been a feasible tool for QA in IGABT of cervix cancer. It should be considered for future IGABT trials and could serve as the basis for continuous quality checks for brachytherapy centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| | - Mario Federico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; Radiation Oncology Department, HUGC Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Karen Nkiwane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Elena Fidarova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Astrid de Leeuw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fokdal L, Sturdza A, Tanderup K, Mazeron R, Tan L, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Kirisits C, Dörr W, Lindegaard J, Pötter R. OC-0086: Late morbidity following image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in 533 patients with cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)32392-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
36
|
van der Heide U, van de Bunt L, Ketelaars M, Jeukens C, Janus C, de Kort G, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. 20 MRI-guided IMRT of tumours of the cervix. Radiother Oncol 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(05)80974-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
37
|
van der Heide U, Janus C, Jeukens C, van de Bunt L, van Vulpen M, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. 366 MR imaging of perfusion in cervical cancers for early assessment of treatment response. Radiother Oncol 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(05)81342-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
38
|
Lagendijk J, Raaymakers B, van der Heide U, Overweg J, Brown K, Bakker C, Raaijmakers A, Vulpen M, Welleweerd J, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. MO-E-J-6B-03: In Room Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Radiotherapy (MRIgRT). Med Phys 2005. [DOI: 10.1118/1.1998294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|