Prospective evaluation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by elastographic methods of liver steatosis and fibrosis; controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurements

AIMS

To examine the temporal changes of both controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM), assessed by Fibroscan, in a large sample of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, we consecutively enrolled 507 adult individuals with Fibroscan-defined NAFLD who were followed for a mean period of 21.2 ± 11.7 months.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 84 patients (16.5%) had a progression of CAP of at least 20% with a median time of 39.93 months, while 201 (39.6%) patients had a progression of LSM of at least 20% with median time of 30.46 months. There were significant differences in the proportion of LSM progression across body mass index (BMI) categories, with obese patients having the highest risk of progression over the follow-up (hazard ratio 1.66; 95%CI 1.23-2.25). Multivariable regression analysis showed that BMI and serum creatinine levels were the strongest predictors for CAP progression in the whole population, while HOMA-estimated insulin resistance was an independent predictor of LSM progression over time in the subgroup of obese patients.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study shows for the first time that the progression risk of both liver steatosis and fibrosis, detected non-invasively by Fibroscan, is relevant and shares essentially the same metabolic risk factors that are associated with NAFLD progression detected by other invasive methods.

Liver Disease During Pregnancy: A Challenging Clinical Issue

One of the least studied topics in the field of obstetrics is liver disease during pregnancy, which creates a challenge for both gynecologists and hepatologists. Approximately 3% of pregnant women are affected by some form of liver disease during pregnancy. Some of these conditions can be fatal for both the mother and child. In addition, 3 types of liver disease need to be differentiated during pregnancy. One type is liver disease directly related to pregnancy, which can occur at a specific time during pregnancy. Another type is liver disease not related to pregnancy, which can occur at any time, such as viral- or drug-induced hepatitis. Furthermore, pregnancy can occur in women with pre-existing liver disease. It is essential that the clinicians are familiar with this disorder so they can respond promptly and appropriately in all of these situations, especially when emergency delivery is needed and must not be postponed.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and liver transplantation - Where do we stand?

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH) is a challenging and multisystem disease that has a high socioeconomic impact. NAFLD/NASH is a main cause of macrovesicular steatosis and has multiple impacts on liver transplantation (LT), on patients on the waiting list for transplant, on post-transplant setting as well as on organ donors. Current data indicate new trends in the area of chronic liver disease. Due to the increased incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components, NASH cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma caused by NASH will soon become a major indication for LT. Furthermore, due to an increasing incidence of MetS and, consequently, NAFLD, there will be more steatotic donor livers and less high quality organs available for LT, in addition to a lack of available liver allografts. Patients who have NASH and are candidates for LT have multiple comorbidities and are unique LT candidates. Finally, we discuss long-term grafts and patient survival after LT, the recurrence of NASH and NASH appearing de novo after transplantation. In addition, we suggest topics and areas that require more research for improving the health care of this increasing patient population.

Forearm bone mass predicts mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients

We aim to determine the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD), measured by T- and Z-score, and mortality risk in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We also investigate which are the most suitable skeletal sites for predicting mortality rate. We analyzed the survival of 102 patients who had been treated with chronic HD according to BMD. Patients with a T-score ≤2.5 at the middle, ultradistal and proximal part of the forearm had a higher mortality risk than those with a T-score of -2.5 or higher. Furthermore, no statistically significant association was found between loss of bone mass at other measuring points-lumbar spine (anteroposterior orientation from L1-L4) and hip (neck, trochanter, intertrochanter, total and Ward's triangle)-and mortality risk. We were also interested in exploring the relationship between Z-score at different skeletal regions and mortality risk. We found that patients with a Z-score of -1 or lower at all three parts of the forearm had a greater mortality risk. It is also worth noting that the Z-score at all three parts of the forearm was a more apparent predictor of mortality, compared to the T-score at the same skeletal regions. This empirical analysis showed that BMD assessments should be obtained at the forearm, due to the good predictability of this skeletal site regarding mortality of HD patients. Moreover, data concerning bone density should be reported as Z-scores.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver and the severity of acute pancreatitis

AIM

To explore the effect of nonalcoholic fatty liver as a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome on the severity of acute pancreatitis. We hypothesized that patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver would have a more severe form of acute pancreatitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 822 patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis. We diagnosed acute pancreatitis and determined its severity according the revised Atlanta classification criteria from 2012. We assessed nonalcoholic fatty liver with computed tomography.

RESULTS

There were 198 (24.1%) patients out of 822 analyzed who had nonalcoholic fatty liver. Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver had statistically higher incidence of moderately severe (35.4% vs. 14.6%; p=0.02) and severe acute pancreatitis (20.7% vs. 9.6%; p<0.001) compared to patients without nonalcoholic fatty liver. At the admission patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver had higher values of C-reactive protein as well as at day three, higher APACHE II score at admission and significantly higher incidence of organ failure and local complications as well as higher values of computed tomography severity index compared to patients without nonalcoholic fatty liver. We found independent association between the occurrence of moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver (OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.236-3.689). Compared to patients without nonalcoholic fatty liver, patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver had a higher death rate, however not statistically significant (5.6% vs. 4.3%; p=NS).

CONCLUSION

Presence of nonalcoholic fatty liver at admission can indicate a higher risk for developing more severe forms of acute pancreatitis and could be used as an additional prognostic tool.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease - A multisystem disease?

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common comorbidities associated with overweight and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Importantly, NAFLD is one of its most dangerous complications because it can lead to severe liver pathologies, including fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatic cellular carcinoma. Given the increasing worldwide prevalence of obesity, NAFLD has become the most common cause of chronic liver disease and therefore is a major global health problem. Currently, NAFLD is predominantly regarded as a hepatic manifestation of MetS. However, accumulating evidence indicates that the effects of NAFLD extend beyond the liver and are negatively associated with a range of chronic diseases, most notably cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is becoming increasingly clear that these diseases are the result of the same underlying pathophysiological processes associated with MetS, such as insulin resistance, chronic systemic inflammation and dyslipidemia. As a result, they have been shown to be independent reciprocal risk factors. In addition, recent data have shown that NAFLD actively contributes to aggravation of the pathophysiology of CVD, T2DM, and CKD, as well as several other pathologies. Thus, NAFLD is a direct cause of many chronic diseases associated with MetS, and better detection and treatment of fatty liver disease is therefore urgently needed. As non-invasive screening methods for liver disease become increasingly available, detection and treatment of NAFLD in patients with MetS should therefore be considered by both (sub-) specialists and primary care physicians.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and colorectal cancer

As a significant cause of cancer death worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) is still one of the most common cancers in the world. The most efficient strategies to reduce CRC incidence include identifying risk factors for CRC and performing a preventive colonoscopy in high-risk populations. Some well-established risk factors for CRC development include hereditary syndromes and inflammatory bowel disease. Of note, in recent years, attention has been given to new evidence indicating that more than 75%-95% of CRC occurs in individuals with little or no genetic risk. For these individuals, the risk for CRC is associated with their lifestyle and dietary factors, including central obesity, overweight and physical inactivity. Recently, evidence demonstrated a connection between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and CRC. Insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are common risks that NAFLD and colorectal neoplasms share. The incidence of NAFLD is increasing in parallel with an increasing prevalence of MetS and obesity. Consequently, the question arises: will the incidence of CRC increase together with this dramatic increase in obesity, MetS and ultimately NAFLD prevalence? Recent studies of adenomatous polyps, CRC and NAFLD are discussed in this manuscript.

Metabolic syndrome and acute pancreatitis

AIM

The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of metabolic syndrome on the course of acute pancreatitis determined by disease severity, the presence of local and systemic complications and survival rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

609 patients admitted to our hospital in the period from January 1, 2008 up to June 31, 2015 with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were analyzed. The diagnosis and the severity of acute pancreatitis were made according to the revised Atlanta classification criteria from 2012.

RESULTS

Of 609 patients with acute pancreatitis, 110 fulfilled the criteria for metabolic syndrome. Patients with metabolic syndrome had statistically significantly higher incidence of moderately severe (38.2% vs. 28.5%; p=0.05) and severe (22.7% vs. 12.8%; p=0.01) acute pancreatitis in comparison to those without metabolic syndrome, while patients without metabolic syndrome had higher incidence of mild acute pancreatitis in comparison to those patients with metabolic syndrome (58.7% vs. 39.1%; p<0.001). Patients with metabolic syndrome had a higher number of local and systemic complications, and higher APACHE II score in comparison to patients without metabolic syndrome. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of metabolic syndrome was independently associated with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis. Comparing survival rates, patients suffering from metabolic syndrome had a higher death rate compared to patients without metabolic syndrome (16% vs. 4.5%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of metabolic syndrome at admission portends a higher risk of moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis, as well as higher mortality rate.

Is there a relationship between hypomagnesemia and proton-pump inhibitors in patients on chronic hemodialysis?

AIM

We investigated the association among long-term proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) use with serum magnesium (Mg) levels in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients, as well as possible association among PPI use and increased risk of cardiovascular (CVD) morbidity in HD patients.

METHODS

Of 418 HD patients that were screened for inclusion, 136 were excluded due to incomplete medical data, duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for less than 12months, use of Mg-based-phosphate binders or other Mg-based medications or either to presence of chronic increased GI losses. Among 282 patients included in the study, 170 patients were on PPIs.

RESULTS

Serum Mg levels were significantly lower among PPI users vs. non-users (0.94±0.2 vs. 1.03±0.2mmol/L; p<0.0001). The median duration of PPI use was 27±9.6months (range from 12 to 108) and it was not significantly associated with Mg levels (r=0.116; p=0.167). Additionally, residual renal function didn't show a significant correlation with Mg concentration (r=-0.102; p=NS) in both groups of patients. The use of PPIs was an independent and strong predictor of low Mg concentrations even in multivariate analysis (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.2498-7.4594, p=0.01). On the other hand, the daily dose of PPIs was not associated with low Mg levels. PPI users had a higher rate of adverse CVD events during the 1 year of follow-up in comparison to non-PPI users but that difference wasn't statistically significant (17.6% vs. 10.7%; p=0.110).

CONCLUSION

We have found a significant association between PPI use and lower serum Mg levels in chronic HD patients.

Body mass index: short- and long-term impact on kidney transplantation

AIM

The topic of pretransplantation body mass index (BMI) is still a matter of controversy. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of pretransplant BMI on short- and long-term outcomes in patients receiving kidney transplant.

METHODS

We have analysed 521 renal transplant recipients (RTRs). BMI was categorised as follows: less than or equal to 20, more than 20 to less than or equal to 25, more than 25 to less than or equal to 30 and more than 30 RESULTS: The distribution of the RTRs per category of BMI at baseline was: ≤ 20 (14.4%), > 20 to ≤ 25 (50.9%), > 25 ≤ 30 (26.9%) and > 30 (7.9%). In further analysis, the patients were stratified into four groups according to their pretransplant BMI values. There was no difference in the rates of delayed graft function between the four analysed groups of patients. Recipients with normal pre-transplant BMI were less likely to develop wound complications in comparison to the recipients with high BMI (p = 0.04) and obese recipients (p = 0.0001). RTRs with normal BMI were less likely to develop lymphoceles in comparison to the recipients with high BMI (p = 0.0003). Obese patients were more likely to develop lymphocele in comparison to the recipients with high BMI (p = 0.01). Obese recipients had a longer mean length of hospital stay in comparison to the recipients with normal BMI (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference regarding 1-year graft and patient survival, as well as because of acute rejection crisis between the investigated groups of recipients. We did not find any significant difference in 5-year patients and graft survival between those RTRs with BMI > 20 to ≤ 25 and to those recipients with BMI > 25.

CONCLUSION

Overweight and obese transplant candidates should not be excluded from kidney transplantation.