An open invitation to join the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry to standardize data collection in pediatric radiation oncology

OBJECTIVE

The Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) is a comprehensive data registry composed of pediatric patients treated with radiation. It was established to expedite outcomes-based research. The attributes which allow the PPCR to be a successful collaboration are reviewed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Current eligibility criteria are radiotherapy patients < 22 years treated at one of the 15 US participating institutions. Detailed health and treatment data are collected about the disease presentation and treatment exposures, and annually thereafter, in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) imaging and radiation plans are collected through MIM/MIMcloud. An optional patient-reported quality-of-life (PedsQL) study is administered at 10 sites.

RESULTS

Accrual started October 2012 with 2,775 participants enrolled as of 25 July 2019. Most patients, 62.0%, were treated for central nervous system (CNS) tumors, the most common of which are medulloblastoma (n = 349), ependymoma (n = 309), and glial/astrocytoma tumors (n = 279). The most common non-CNS diagnoses are rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 284), Ewing's sarcoma (n = 153), and neuroblastoma (n = 130). While the majority of participants are US residents, 18.7% come from 36 other countries. Over 685 patients participate in the PedsQL study.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPCR is a valuable research platform capable of answering countless research questions that will ultimately improve patient care. Centers outside of the USA are invited to participate directly or may engage with the PPCR to align data collection strategies to facilitate large-scale international research.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

For investigators looking to carry out research in a large pediatric oncology cohort or interested in registry work, this paper provides an updated overview of the PPCR.

Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

A broad range of stakeholders have called for randomised evidence on the potential clinical benefits and harms of proton therapy, a type of radiation therapy, for patients with breast cancer. Radiation therapy is an important component of curative treatment, reducing cancer recurrence and extending survival. Compared with photon therapy, the international treatment standard, proton therapy reduces incidental radiation to the heart. Our overall objective is to evaluate whether the differences between proton and photon therapy cardiac radiation dose distributions lead to meaningful reductions in cardiac morbidity and mortality after treatment for breast cancer.

METHODS

We are conducting a large scale, multicentre pragmatic randomised clinical trial for patients with breast cancer who will be followed longitudinally for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, health-related quality of life and cancer control outcomes. A total of 1278 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer will be randomly allocated to receive either photon or proton therapy. The primary outcomes are major cardiovascular events, defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for unstable angina, heart failure, valvular disease, arrhythmia or pericardial disease. Secondary endpoints are urgent or unanticipated outpatient or emergency room visits for heart failure, arrhythmia, valvular disease or pericardial disease. The Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Clinical Events Centre will conduct centralised, blinded adjudication of primary outcome events.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The RadComp trial has been approved by the institutional review boards of all participating sites. Recruitment began in February 2016. Current version of the protocol is A3, dated 08 November 2018. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, stakeholder engagement efforts and presentation to the public via lay media outlets.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02603341.

Minimal toxicity after proton beam therapy for prostate and pelvic nodal irradiation: results from the proton collaborative group REG001-09 trial

BACKGROUND

Proton beam therapy (PBT) reduces normal organ dose compared to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMXT) for prostate cancer patients who receive pelvic radiation therapy. It is not known whether this dosimetric advantage results in less gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity than would be expected from IMXT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We evaluated treatment parameters and toxicity outcomes for non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who received pelvic radiation therapy and enrolled on the PCG REG001-09 trial. Patients who received X-ray therapy and/or brachytherapy were excluded. Of 3210 total enrolled prostate cancer patients, 85 received prostate and pelvic radiation therapy exclusively with PBT. Most had clinically and radiographically negative lymph nodes although 6 had pelvic nodal disease and one also had para-aortic involvement. Pelvic radiation therapy was delivered using either 2 fields (opposed laterals) or 3 fields (opposed laterals and a posterior beam). Median pelvic dose was 46.9 GyE (range 39.7-56) in 25 fractions (range 24-30). Median boost dose to the prostate +/- seminal vesicles was 30 GyE (range 20-41.4) in 16 fractions (range 10-24).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 14.5 months (range 2.8-49.2). Acute grade 1, 2, and 3 GI toxicity rates were 16.4, 2.4, 0%, respectively. Acute grade 1, 2, and 3 GU toxicity rates were 60, 34.1, 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate cancer patients who receive pelvic radiation therapy using PBT experience significantly less acute GI toxicity than is expected using IMXT. Further investigation is warranted to confirm whether this favorable acute GI toxicity profile is related to small bowel sparing from PBT.

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Synonymous with Effort Syndrome?

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), including myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and postviral syndrome (PVS), is a term used today to describe a condition of incapacity for making and sustaining effort, associated with a wide range of symptoms. None of the reviews of CFS has provided a proper consideration of the effort syndrome caused by chronic habitual hyperventilation. In 100 consecutive patients, whose CFS had been attributed to ME or PVS, the time course of their illness and the respiratory psychophysiological studies were characteristic of chronic habitual hyperventilation in 93. It is suggested that the labels ‘CFS’, ‘ME’ or TVS' should be withheld until chronic habitual hyperventilation - for which conventional rehabilitation is available - has been definitively excluded.

Outcomes According to Breast Cancer Subtype in Patients Treated With Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to determine outcomes for patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) on the basis of breast cancer subtype (BCST).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our single-institution, institutional review board-approved APBI database was queried for patients who had complete testing results for the estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and HER2/neu receptors to determine outcomes for each BCST. Women were assigned as luminal A (LA), luminal B (LB), HER2, and basal BCST using their ER, PR, and HER2/neu receptor status. Degree of ER expression supplemented the receptor-based luminal BCST assignment. Two hundred seventy-eight patients had results for all 3 receptors (LA = 164 [59%], LB = 81 [29%], HER2 = 5 [2%], basal = 28 [10%]), which were submitted for analysis (ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence [IBTR], regional nodal failure, distant metastasis [DM], disease-free survival [DFS], cause-specific survival [CSS], and overall survival [OS]).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5.4 years (range, 0.1-12.4 years). Basal and HER2 subtype patients had higher histologic grades (Grade 3 = 75% vs. 10% LA/LB; P < .001), larger tumors (13.0 mm basal vs. 10.7 mm LA/LB; P = .059), and were more likely to receive chemotherapy (68% vs. 15% LA/LB; P < .001). Margin and nodal status were similar among BCSTs. At 5 years, IBTR rates were similar (1.8%, 2.9%, 0%, and 4.8%) for LA, LB, HER2, and basal subtypes, respectively (P = .62). DM was only seen in LA (2.9%) and LB (1.3%) (P = .83). DFS (95%-100%), CSS (97%-100%), and OS (80%-100%) were not statistically different (P = .97, .87, .46, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Five-year local control rates after breast-conserving surgery, APBI, and appropriate systemic therapy are excellent for luminal, HER2, and basal phenotypes of early-stage breast cancer; however, further study of receptor subtype effect on risk stratification in early-stage breast cancer is needed.

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Evaluating the Role of Radiation Therapy in the Management and Attempts to Identify Low-risk Patients

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast has rapidly increased in incidence over the past several decades secondary to an increased use of screening mammography. Local treatment options for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ include mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy. Although several randomized trials have confirmed a >50% reduction in the risk of local recurrence with the administration of radiation therapy (RT) compared with breast-conserving surgery alone, controversy persists regarding whether or not RT is needed in selected "low-risk" patients. Over the past two decades, two prospective single-arm studies and one randomized trial have been performed and confirm that the omission of RT after surgery is associated with higher rates of local recurrence even after selecting patients with optimal clinical and pathologic features. Importantly, these trials have failed to consistently and reproducibly identify a low-risk cohort of patients (based on clinical and pathologic features) that does not benefit from RT. As a result, adjuvant RT is still advocated in the majority of patients, even in low-risk cases. Future research is moving beyond traditional clinical and pathologic risk factors and instead focusing on approaches such as multigene assays and biomarkers with the hopes of identifying truly low-risk patients who may not require RT. However, recent studies confirm that even low-risk patients identified from multigene assays have higher rates of local recurrence with local excision alone than would be expected with the addition of RT.

Management of solitary and multiple brain metastases from breast cancer

As local and systemic control of breast cancer improves, metastasis to the brain remains a common event requiring a specialized management approach. Women diagnosed with breast cancer who develop brain metastases have superior overall survival compared to patients with other forms of metastatic carcinoma. This article summarizes some of the unique aspects of care for patients with breast cancer metastases to the brain.

Dosimetric evaluation of target coverage as a predictor of local failure following stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal tumors

PURPOSE

To perform a dosimetric analysis of target coverage and determine parameters predictive for local failure (LF) in patients undergoing spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (sSBRT).Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven spinal tumors in 59 patients were treated with image-guided linac-based sSBRT from 2008-2012. Median prescription dose was 18Gy (8-35) delivered in 1-5 fractions (87% single-fraction). Prescription dose was targeted to cover ≥ 80% of PTV within spinal cord (SC) dose constraints (9/11Gy to 0.1cc SC/SC+2mm). Twelve tumors had local failure (LF, median time-to-failure 3.7 months) and were compared to 14 tumors with >1-year follow-up and local control (LC). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine parameters predictive of LF.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 7.4 months and 24.7 months for LF and LC, respectively. Post-SBRT, 42% of LF patients had neurological symptoms due to tumor progression. No patients developed post-SBRT myelopathy. Pre-treatment PTV volumes were not statistically different (median/mean/range 61.8/74.5/19.9-206.4cc for LF vs 39.4/47.1/10.3-119.7cc for LC; p=0.13). LF tumors had larger volumes receiving <80% of prescription dose (5.2cc vs 1.9cc, p=0.02) and larger overlap volume between GTV/SC within 2 and 3mm (p=0.01/p=0.007). LF tumors had lower GTV minimum dose (5.6 vs 8.5Gy, p=0.001) and smaller GTV to SC distance (0.06 vs 0.19mm, p=0.049). Maximum SC doses were not statistically different (6.4Gy LC vs 9.2Gy LF, p=0.33). GTV minimum dose was predictive of LF, with a trend for overlapping GTV/SC volume within 2mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimum GTV dose, PTV volume receiving <80% prescription dose, smaller GTV-SC distance, and large overlapping volume of PTV/SC are predictive of LF after SBRT. Given the absence of SC toxicity but neurological progression upon LF, less conservative SC constraints should be considered.

Outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer treated with radiation therapy

88

Background: This study compares outcomes between different types of loco-regional treatment modalities used in patients with triple negative breast cancers. Methods: 299 patients with triple negative breast cancer diagnosed between April 2004 and August 2011 at a single institution and who were treated with radiation therapy were included in an IRB-approved retrospective review. Electronic charts were reviewed for demographic and pathologic data as well as outcome data including locoregional and distant recurrence. The median follow up period was 3 years. 200 (70%) patients underwent lumpectomy with whole breast irradiation (WBI). 68 (22.7%) patients received mastectomy and radiation while 31(10.4%) patients were treated with lumpectomy with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Results: Forty-nine patients (16.4%) experienced recurrence (10 local; 6 contralateral; 3 regional; 36 distant). There was a significant (p<0.0001) difference in the proportion of patients that experienced a recurrence in each treatment group: 34% (n=23) in mastectomy with radiation group; 12% (n=23) in lumpectomy with WBI group; 10% (n=3) in lumpectomy with APBI group. On univariate analysis, tumor size, tumor stage, nodal stage, overall stage, total number of positive nodes, total number of nodes removed, and whether or not the patients had an axillary lymph node dissection were significantly associated with recurrence (p<0.05). When these predictor variables, including treatment type, were examined using a stepwise cox proportional hazards regression model for recurrence, the only variables that remained significant were tumor stage (p= 0.0003) and the number of positive nodes (p= 0.0008). Survival curves were significantly different (p = 0.016) between the lumpectomy with WBI group and the mastectomy with radiation group. Over all follow-up times, the probability of survival was smallest for the mastectomy with radiation group. Conclusions: The recurrence pattern for triple negative breast cancers treated with radiation therapy was primarily distant for all treatment modalities. In our patient population, tumor stage and number of positive lymph nodes predicted for recurrence while radiotherapy technique did not.

Treatment efficacy with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): final analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite(®) breast brachytherapy registry trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine data on treatment efficacy, cosmesis and toxicities for the final analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite(®) breast brachytherapy registry trial.

METHODS

A total of 1,449 cases of early-stage breast cancer underwent breast conserving therapy. The single-lumen MammoSite(®) device was used to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) (34 Gy in 3.4 Gy fractions). Of these, 1,255 cases (87 %) had invasive breast cancer (IBC) and 194 cases had DCIS. Median follow-up was 63.1 months with 45 % of all patients having follow-up of 6 years or longer.

RESULTS

There were 41 cases (2.8 %) that developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) for a 5-year actuarial rate of 3.8 % (3.7 % for IBC and 4.1 % for DCIS). Tumor size (odds ratio [OR] = 1.1, p = 0.03) and estrogen receptor negativity (OR = 3.0, p = 0.0009) were associated with IBTR, while a trend was noted for positive margins (OR = 2.0, p = 0.06) and cautionary/unsuitable status compared with suitable status (OR = 1.8, p = 0.07). The percentage of patients with excellent/good cosmetic results at 60, 72, and 84 months was 91.3, 90.5, and 90.6 %, respectively. The overall rates of fat necrosis and infections remained low at 2.5 and 9.6 % with few late toxicity events beyond 2 years. The overall symptomatic seroma rate was 13.4 and 0.6 % beyond 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The final analysis of treatment efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite(®) breast brachytherapy registry trial confirms previously noted excellent results and compares favorably with other forms of APBI with similar follow-up and to outcomes seen in selected patients treated with whole breast irradiation.

Cost-efficacy of acceleration partial-breast irradiation compared with whole-breast irradiation

The purpose of this study was to analyze the cost-efficacy of multiple accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) techniques compared with whole breast irradiation (WBI) delivered utilizing 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A previously reported matched-pair analysis consisting of 199 patients receiving WBI and 199 patients receiving interstitial APBI formed the basis of this analysis. Cost analyses included a cost minimization analysis, incremental cost- effectiveness ratio (ICER) analysis, and cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) analysis. Per 1,000 patients treated, the cost savings with the utilization of APBI compared to WBI IMRT is $14.9 million, $10.9 million, $8.8 million, $5.0 million, and $9.7 million for APBI 3D-CRT, APBI IMRT, APBI single-lumen (SL), APBI multi-lumen (ML), and APBI interstitial, respectively. Per 1,000 patients treated, the cost savings with the utilization of APBI compared to WBI 3D-CRT is $6.0 million, $2.0 million, and $0.7 million for APBI 3D-CRT, APBI IMRT, and APBI interstitial, respectively. The cost per QALY for APBI SL, APBI ML, and APBI interstitial compared with APBI 3D-CRT are $12,273, $66,032, and $546, respectively. When incorporating non-medical costs and cost of recurrences the cost per QALY was $54,698 and $49,009 for APBI ML compared with APBI 3D-CRT. When compared to WBI IMRT, all APBI techniques are cost-effective based on cost minimization, ICER, and QALY analyses. When compared to WBI 3D-CRT, external beam APBI techniques represent a more cost-effective approach based on cost minimization with brachytherapy representing a cost-effective approach based on cost per QALY.

Evaluation of current consensus statement recommendations for accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pooled analysis of William Beaumont Hospital and American Society of Breast Surgeon MammoSite Registry Trial Data

PURPOSE

To determine whether the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Consensus Statement (CS) recommendations for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) are associated with significantly different outcomes in a pooled analysis from William Beaumont Hospital (WBH) and the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MammoSite® Registry Trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

APBI was used to treat 2127 cases of early-stage breast cancer (WBH, n=678; ASBrS, n=1449). Three forms of APBI were used at WBH (interstitial, n=221; balloon-based, n=255; or 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, n=206), whereas all Registry Trial patients received balloon-based brachytherapy. Patients were divided according to the ASTRO CS into suitable (n=661, 36.5%), cautionary (n=850, 46.9%), and unsuitable (n=302, 16.7%) categories. Tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed according to CS group.

RESULTS

The median age was 65 years (range, 32-94 years), and the median tumor size was 10.0 mm (range, 0-45 mm). The median follow-up time was 60.6 months. The WBH cohort had more node-positive disease (6.9% vs 2.6%, P<.01) and cautionary patients (49.5% vs 41.8%, P=.06). The 5-year actuarial ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), regional nodal failure (RNF), and distant metastasis (DM) for the whole cohort were 2.8%, 0.6%, 1.6%. The rate of IBTR was not statistically higher between suitable (2.5%), cautionary (3.3%), or unsuitable (4.6%) patients (P=.20). The nonsignificant increase in IBTR for the cautionary and unsuitable categories was due to increased elsewhere failures and new primaries (P=.04), not tumor bed recurrence (P=.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent outcomes after breast-conserving surgery and APBI were seen in our pooled analysis. The current ASTRO CS guidelines did not adequately differentiate patients at an increased risk of IBTR or tumor bed failure in this large patient cohort.

Twenty-year outcomes after breast-conserving surgery and definitive radiotherapy for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Management of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at a single institution was reviewed to determine long-term clinical outcomes after treatment with breast-conserving therapy (BCT).

METHODS

Data from all patient-cases with DCIS who received BCT between 1980 and 1993 were reviewed. Patient demographics and pathologic factors were analyzed for their effect on outcomes, including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and survival. BCT included breast-conserving surgery followed by external-beam radiotherapy to the whole breast, with 86 % of patients receiving a lumpectomy cavity boost. The median dose to the whole breast was 50 Gy and 60.4 Gy to the lumpectomy cavity.

RESULTS

A total of 129 cases were evaluated; the median follow-up was 19.3 years. Twenty-one patients developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), 76.2 % of which were invasive (n = 16). Fourteen recurrences (66 %) were within the same breast quadrant (true recurrence), while an additional 7 cases developed an IBTR elsewhere in the breast. True recurrences were more prevalent in women <45 years of age (20 %/24 % vs. 5.1 %/8 %) at 10 and 20 years (p = 0.02). The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year actuarial rates of IBTR for this cohort were 8.7, 10.4, 12.1, and 16.3 % (IBTR), while overall survival at 5, 10, and 20 years was 97.6, 96.8, and 96.8 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mammographically detected DCIS remains a clinically distinct subset of noninvasive breast cancer. With 20 year follow-up, local control and overall survival are excellent after BCT.

P3-13-02: The Impact of Lymph Node Status on Clinical Outcomes Following Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

Background: Limited data exists on outcomes following accelerated partial breast irradiation in node-positive breast cancer patients. The purpose of this analysis was to compare clinical outcomes following accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) between node-negative and node-positive early stage breast cancer patients and to identify if nodal positivity leads to increased rates of local or axillary failure. Materials and Methods: 510 patients with early stage breast cancer received accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as part of their breast conservation therapy between April 1993 and November, 2010. Of these, 39 were lymph node positive with 10 patients having N1mi disease (median size of mets= 0.82 mm) and 29 patients having N1 disease (61.5% had one node positive [median size of mets= 2.5 mm], 30.8% had 2 nodes positive [median size of mets= 8.0 mm], and 7.7% had 3 nodes positive [median size of mets= 20 mm]). Patient, clinical, and pathologic factors were analyzed and compared for the node-negative and node-positive cohorts including age, tumor size, receptor status, margin status, adjuvant hormonal therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and length of follow-up. Clinical outcomes were analyzed including local recurrence (LR), regional recurrence (RR), axillary recurrence (AR), regional-nodal recurrence (RR), distant metastases (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Node-positive patients were younger (p=0.04), had larger tumors (p&lt;0.001), and were more likely to receive chemotherapy (p&lt;0.001). Median follow up was 5.3 years for node-negative patients and 5.9 years for node-positive patients (p=0.06). At 5 years, no differences were seen in the 5-year actuarial rates of LR (2.2% v. 2.6%, p=0.86), AR (0% v. 0%, p=0.69), DFS (90.0% v. 88.0%, p=0.79), CSS (98.0% v. 90.0%, p=0.06), or OS (91.0 v. 84.0%, p=0.65) while higher rates of RR (0% v. 6.1%, p&lt;0.001) and DM (2.2% v. 8.9%, p=0.005) were noted in node-positive patients. A total of 10 LRs occurred in the node-negative patients and 1 LR in the node-positive patients at a median of 2.6 and 1.5 years respectively. Both RR that developed in node-positive patients were within the supraclavicular fossa at a median of 2.8 years. Univariate analysis of LR was performed and age (p=0.31), tumor size (p=0.48), ER status (p=0.13), PR status (p=0.34), T-stage (p=0.48), chemotherapy (p=0.41), APBI technique (p=0.80), and nodal status (p=0.86) were not associated with LR while there was a trend for the association of LR with close/positive margins (p=0.07), and failure to receive adjuvant hormonal therapy (p=0.06). No variables were associated with any type of AR.

Discussion: No difference was seen in the rates of local recurrence or axillary failure between node-negative and node-positive following APBI with 5-years of follow-up. Increased rates of regional failure were noted with APBI in node-positive patients due to supraclavicular failures; however, traditional whole breast irradiation techniques would not have covered these failures.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-02.

P3-13-09: Impact of Estrogen Receptor Negativity on Clinical Outcomes Following Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

Purpose: To determine the impact of estrogen receptor (ER) negativity on clinical outcomes for patients treated with Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI).

Materials/Methods(s): We evaluated 506 consecutive patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy (n= 199), balloon-based brachytherapy (n=203), and 3D-CRT (n=104). ER negative (ERN) status was assigned using the traditional definition of an ER nuclear IHC stain &lt; 10%, which corresponds to an Allred/NSABP staining score of &lt; 2. 63 patients (12.5%) were ER negative and 443 (87.5%) were ER positive (ERP). Patient demographics and clinical outcomes (IBTR, RNF, DM, DFS, CSS, OS) were analyzed for each group.

Results: The two groups had similar patient characteristics. Tumor sizes were slightly larger for the ERN group at 11.9mm vs. 10.7mm, although this was not statistically significant (p=0.14). No differences were seen in median age (63 vs. 64 years, p=0.36), rate of HER-2/neu overexpression (83% vs. 91%, p=0.11), or lymph node positivity (6% vs. 9%, p=0.55) between the ERN vs. ERP groups, respectively. There were an equal distribution of invasive ductal carcinoma (ERN n=55, 87%; ERP n=387, 87%) and DCIS (ERN n=8, 13%; ERP n=56, 13%) patients within each group. The use of chemotherapy (55% vs. 15%, p&lt;0.001) and nuclear grade (71% vs. 12%, p&lt;0.001) were higher in the ERN vs. ERP cohort. With a mean follow up of 6.1 years, the 5-year actuarial rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), regional nodal failure (RNF), and distant metastasis (DM) for the entire cohort were 1.8%, 0.6%, and 3.2%. Although this was not statistically significant, ERN patients appear to have an increased rate of local failure than patients with ERP histology (4.0% vs. 1.5%, p=0.13). Rates of RNF and DM were, however, significantly higher for the ERN group (RNF: 4.9% ERN vs. 0% ERP, p&lt;0.001; DM: 12.1% ERN vs. 2.0% ERP, p&lt;0.001). Although there was no difference in overall survival at six years (86% vs. 90%, p=0.67), we observed a shorter disease-free survival (86.4% vs. 96.5%, p= 0.01) and cause-specific survival (90% vs. 98%, p=0.01) for the ERN vs. ERP groups.

Conclusion: The ER negative phenotype of early-stage breast cancer may have a decreased rate of locoregional control. We observed a higher rate of DM with reduced disease-free and cause-specific survival in ER negative cases, emphasizing the importance of systemic therapy and careful, long-term follow up for these patients. Prospective study of this histologic subtype with a larger cohort of patients is needed to substantiate these findings.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-09.

Easily hydrolyzable, water-soluble derivatives of (+/-)-alpha-5-[1-(indol-3-yl)ethyl]-2-methylamino-delta2-thiazoline-4-one, a novel antiviral compound

The preparation of a series of indole N-acyl and N-carbamic esters of (+/-)-alpha-5-[1-(indol-3-yl)ethyl]-2-methylamino-delta2-thiazolin-4-one (1) is reported. These derivatives were synthesized as potential water-soluble precursors of the antiviral thiazolinone 1, for evaluation by intranasal administration against influenza and other respiratory infections caused by viruses. Salts of the basic carbamic esters (16--19) possess the required water solubility, undergo rapid hydrolysis and decarboxylation at pH values greater than 6, and have high activity against influenza A2 and Coxsackie B1 viruses in vitro. In influenza A2 infected ferrets a representative ester (16) reduced the severity and duration of disease symptoms and reduced nasal wash virus titres but caused local irritancy.