Common chromosomal fragile site FRA16D sequence: identification of the FOR gene spanning FRA16D and homozygous deletions and translocation breakpoints in cancer cells

Fluorescence in situ hybridization of a tile path of DNA subclones has previously enabled the cyto-genetic definition of the minimal DNA sequence which spans the FRA16D common chromosomal fragile site, located at 16q23.2. Homozygous deletion of the FRA16D locus has been reported in adenocarcinomas of stomach, colon, lung and ovary. We have sequenced the 270 kb containing the FRA16D fragile site and the minimal homozygously deleted region in tumour cells. This sequence enabled localization of some of the tumour cell breakpoints to regions which contain AT-rich secondary structures similar to those associated with the FRA10B and FRA16B rare fragile sites. The FRA16D DNA sequence also led to the identification of an alternatively spliced gene, named FOR (fragile site FRA16D oxidoreductase), exons of which span both the fragile site and the minimal region of homozygous deletion. In addition, the complete DNA sequence of the FRA16D-containing FOR intron reveals no evidence of additional authentic transcripts. Alternatively spliced FOR transcripts (FOR I, FOR II and FOR III) encode proteins which share N-terminal WW domains and differ at their C-terminus, with FOR III having a truncated oxidoreductase domain. FRA16D-associated deletions selectively affect the FOR gene transcripts. Three out of five previously mapped translocation breakpoints in multiple myeloma are also located within the FOR gene. FOR is therefore the principle genetic target for DNA instability at 16q23.2 and perturbation of FOR function is likely to contribute to the biological consequences of DNA instability at FRA16D in cancer cells.

Molecular basis of p(CCG)n repeat instability at the FRA16A fragile site locus

Rare, folate-sensitive fragile sites are the result of the unstable expansion of trinucleotide p(CCG)n repeats, which are normally polymorphic in copy number. Differences in the number and frequency of alleles of the fragile site FRA16A p(CCG)n repeat were observed between different ethnic populations suggesting that certain alleles might be predisposed to instability. Sequence analysis demonstrated that the longer and more variable alleles were associated with loss of repeat interruption. Perfect repeat configuration therefore appears to be a necessary precondition for the instability associated with fragile site genesis.

Implications of FRA16A structure for the mechanism of chromosomal fragile site genesis

Fragile sites are chemically induced nonstaining gaps in chromosomes. Different fragile sites vary in frequency in the population and in the chemistry of their induction. DNA sequences encompassing and including the rare, autosomal, folate-sensitive fragile site, FRA16A, were isolated by positional cloning. The molecular basis of FRA16A was found to be expansion of a normally polymorphic p(CCG)n repeat. This repeat was adjacent to a CpG island that was methylated in fragile site-expressing individuals. The FRA16A locus in individuals who do not express the fragile site is not a site of DNA methylation (imprinting), which suggests that the methylation associated with fragile sites may be a consequence and not a cause of their genesis.

Deletion of gene for multidrug resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia with inversion in chromosome 16: prognostic implications

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) associated with an inversion in chromosome 16 has a relatively favourable prognosis. The AML subclass most commonly associated with this chromosomal abnormality is acute myelomonocytic leukaemia with abnormal eosinophils. In some AML patients with inversion 16 the chromosomal lesion results in deletion of MRP, the gene for multidrug resistance associated protein. This gene is proximal to the primary breakpoint and loss of its function may play a key role in determining the favourable outcome in inversion 16 AML. We have demonstrated deletion of MRP by in situ hybridisation, by gene dosage studies and by studying loss of heterogeneity of a flanking microsatellite marker. Among 13 AML patients with inversion 16 MRP deletion was detected in 5 while 7 had no deletion. Deletion of MRP gene was associated with longer time from diagnosis until death or relapse from complete remission (p = 0.007). These findings provide important insight into the biology of inversion 16 leukaemia and suggest that MRP deletion, as detected by molecular analysis, may have a key role in determining outcome in patients with inversion 16 AML.

Isolation and characterization of transcribed sequences from a chromosome 16 hn-cDNA library and the physical mapping of genes and transcribed sequences using a high-resolution somatic cell panel of human chromosome 16

A hn-cDNA (heteronuclear complementary DNA) library was constructed from a mouse/human somatic cell hybrid, CY18, which contains chromosome 16 as the only human chromosome. Hexamer primers constructed from consensus 5' intron splice sequences were used to generate cDNA from the immature unspliced mRNA. The resulting cDNA library was screened with a total human DNA probe to identify potential human clones. Rescreening was necessary, and use of a mouse-derived clone with homology to 7SL RNA proved successful in eliminating the majority of mouse clones. Thirteen clones had open reading frames, and of those, five showed homology to human sequences in GenBank. Two clones had homology to random partially sequenced cDNAs, one clone was likely to be a GRP78 pseudogene, one clone mapped the PHKG2 gene to 16p11.2-16p12.1, and one clone had homology to human S13 ribosomal protein. All clones except the latter were mapped to a high-resolution somatic cell panel. Although isolation of human chromosome 16 genes from this library was successful, it was apparent that cDNA synthesis was initiated at sites other than intron splice sites, presumably by mispairing of the hexamers.

High-resolution cytogenetic-based physical map of human chromosome 16

A panel of 54 mouse/human somatic cell hybrids, each possessing various portions of chromosome 16, was constructed; 46 were constructed from naturally occurring rearrangements of this chromosome, which were ascertained in clinical cytogenetics laboratories, and a further 8 from rearrangements spontaneously arising during tissue culture. By mapping 235 DNA markers to this panel of hybrids, and in relation to four fragile sites and the centromere, a cytogenetic-based physical map of chromosome 16 with an average resolution of 1.6 Mb was generated. Included are 66 DNA markers that have been typed in the CEPH pedigrees, and these will allow the construction of a detailed correlation of the cytogenetic-based physical map and the genetic map of this chromosome. Cosmids from chromosome 16 that have been assembled into contigs by use of repetitive sequence fingerprinting have been mapped to the hybrid panel. Approximately 11% of the euchromatin is now both represented in such contigs and located on the cytogenetic-based physical map. This high-resolution cytogenetic-based physical map of chromosome 16 will provide the basis for the cloning of genetically mapped disease genes, genes disrupted in cytogenetic rearrangements that have produced abnormal phenotypes, and cancer breakpoints.

Evaluation of a cosmid contig physical map of human chromosome 16

A cosmid contig physical map of human chromosome 16 has been developed by repetitive sequence finger-printing of approximately 4000 cosmid clones obtained from a chromosome 16-specific cosmid library. The arrangement of clones in contigs is determined by (1) estimating cosmid length and determining the likelihoods for all possible pairwise clone overlaps, using the fingerprint data, and (2) using an optimization technique to fit contig maps to these estimates. Two important questions concerning this contig map are how much of chromosome 16 is covered and how accurate are the assembled contigs. Both questions can be addressed by hybridization of single-copy sequence probes to gridded arrays of the cosmids. All of the fingerprinted clones have been arrayed on nylon membranes so that any region of interest can be identified by hybridization. The hybridization experiments indicate that approximately 84% of the euchromatic arms of chromosome 16 are covered by contigs and singleton cosmids. Both grid hybridization (26 contigs) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis experiments (11 contigs) confirmed the assembled contigs, indicating that false positive overlaps occur infrequently in the present map. Furthermore, regional localization of 93 contigs and singleton cosmids to a somatic cell hybrid mapping panel indicates that there is no bias in the coverage of the euchromatic arms.

A refined physical map of the long arm of human chromosome 16

Mapping of 33 anonymous DNA probes and 12 genes to the long arm of chromosome 16 was achieved by the use of 14 mouse/human hybrid cell lines and the fragile site FRA16B. Two of the hybrid cell lines contained overlapping interstitial deletions in bands q21 and q22.1. The localization of the 12 genes has been refined. The breakpoints present in the hybrids, in conjunction with the fragile site, can potentially divide the long arm of chromosome 16 into 16 regions. However, this was reduced to 14 regions because in two instances there were no probes or genes that mapped between pairs of breakpoints.