Rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients treated with multi-modal endovascular reperfusion therapy

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of multi-modal endovascular reperfusion therapy (MMRT) on functional outcomes following rehabilitation.

METHODS

Data from 14 MMRT-treated patients were analyzed and compared to MMRT-ineligible, age and stroke severity-matched patients treated at the same Neurological and Rehabilitation departments. Neurological evaluation was assessed with the NIH stroke scale (NIHSS). Activity of daily living was measured using the FIMTM instrument. Functional outcome was measured using the modified Rankin scale (mRS).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. NIHSS scores were lower in the MMRT group and they had slightly better functional and rehabilitation scores on admission to rehabilitation. At the end of rehabilitation, more MMRT-treated patients reached functional independence (mRS≤2; 50% vs. 7% respectively P=0.03). FIM scores were also higher in the MMRT group (mean score 93.3 vs. 87.7, respectively) but the difference did not reach significance. The delta in FIM and NIHSS scores obtained during rehabilitation did not significantly differ between the groups. MMRT remained a significant modifier of good outcome after regression analysis (OR 21.5 95% CI 1.1-410).

CONCLUSION

MMRT-treated patients have better chances of attaining independence after rehabilitation therapy. However, the additional improvements gained while in active rehabilitation were independent of reperfusion status.

Erythropoietin is neuroprotective, improves functional recovery, and reduces neuronal apoptosis and inflammation in a rodent model of experimental closed head injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in young people in industrialized countries. Although various anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic modalities have shown neuroprotective effects in experimental models of TBI, to date, no specific pharmacological agent aimed at blocking the progression of secondary brain damage has been approved for clinical use. Erythropoietin (Epo) belongs to the cytokine superfamily and has traditionally been viewed as a hematopoiesis-regulating hormone. The newly discovered neuroprotective properties of Epo lead us to investigate its effect in TBI in a mouse model of closed head injury. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEpo) was injected at 1 and 24 h after TBI, and the effect on recovery of motor and cognitive functions, tissue inflammation, axonal degeneration, and apoptosis was evaluated up to 14 days. Motor deficits were lower, cognitive function was restored faster, and less apoptotic neurons and caspase-3 expression were found in rhEpo-treated as compared with vehicle-treated animals (P<0.05). Axons at the trauma area in rhEpo-treated mice were relatively well preserved compared with controls (shown by their density; P<0.01). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a reduced activation of glial cells by staining for GFAP and complement receptor type 3 (CD11b/CD18) in the injured hemisphere of Epo- vs. vehicle-treated animals. We propose that further studies on Epo in TBI should be conducted in order to consider it as a novel therapy for TBI.

Apolipoprotein E-epsilon4 genotype predicts a poor outcome in survivors of traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

To determine the ability of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes to predict days of unconsciousness and a suboptimal functional outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors.

BACKGROUND

TBI is known to be associated with neuropsychological deficits and functional disability. Recent evidence indicates that APOE plays a pivotal role in CNS response to injury.

METHODS

In this prospective study the authors determined the APOE genotypes and tested their ability to predict days of unconsciousness and functional outcome after at least 6 months in 69 survivors of TBI. A good functional outcome was defined as no dysarthria, behavioral abnormalities, or dysphasia; no severe cognitive abnormalities; and the ability to live independently.

RESULTS

The odds ratio of more than 7 days of unconsciousness was 5.69 in those with the APOE-epsilon4 allele compared with those without the epsilon4 allele (95% CI, 1.69 to 20.0; p = 0.001). Only 1 of 27 subjects (3.7%) with the epsilon4 allele had a good functional outcome compared with 13 of 42 (31.0%) of those without the epsilon4 allele (p = 0.006). The OR of a suboptimal outcome (fair or unfavorable) was 13.93 for those with the epsilon4 allele compared with those without the allele after controlling for age and time of unconsciousness (95% CI, 1.45 to 133.97; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate a strong association between the APOE-epsilon4 allele and a poor clinical outcome, implying genetic susceptibility to the effect of brain injury. Additional studies of TBI patients are warranted to confirm their findings.

Experimental pressure pain in patients with complex regional pain syndrome, Type I (reflex sympathetic dystrophy)

Research in animals shows that the levels of neuropathic pain expression is genetically associated with a characteristic response profile to sensory stimuli. The aim of the present investigation was to examine if pressure algometry can identify a specific pain sensitivity profile in patients with complex regional pain syndrome, Type I (reflex sympathetic dystrophy), and to distinguish complex regional pain syndromes from other chronic pain dysfunction syndromes. Pressure pain threshold and pain tolerance measured at the sternum in 17 patients with complex regional pain syndrome, Type I (reflex sympathetic dystrophy), were compared with values obtained in 13 patients suffering from other chronic pain dysfunction syndromes and in a control group of 24 pain-free volunteers. The pressure algometer consisted of a force displacement transducer with a 0.25 cm2 tip connected to a recorder. The rate of force application was 1 kg/0.25 cm2/s. The difference between threshold and tolerance was defined as the pain sensitivity range. Young patients with complex regional pain syndrome (<40 yr) demonstrated a significantly higher mean pain sensitivity range compared with young subjects who had chronic pain or who were pain-free. Mean threshold and tolerance values were significantly lower in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (2.7+/-1.0 kg (mean +/- standard deviation) and 5.4+/-2.0 kg, respectively) and in patients suffering from other chronic pain syndromes (2.6+/-1.1 and 4.6+/-1.7 kg) than in healthy subjects (5.4+/-2.3 and 8.4+/-2.6 kg). Women in the chronic pain group exhibited a significantly lower pressure pain threshold than all other subgroups. Regardless of group, women exhibited lower pressure pain tolerance than men. In conclusion, the study contained herein shows a specific pain sensitivity profile to experimental stimuli behavior in young patients with complex regional pain syndrome expressed by a large pressure pain sensitivity range, at a location away from the painful area. However, one single pressure pain measurement over the sternum is insufficient for differentiation of patients with complex regional pain syndrome from those with chronic pain because of intersubject variation.