Plasma EBV DNA in Nasopharyngeal Cancer (NPC) Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy (RT)

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

EBV DNA has well-studied roles in NPC including early detection and surveillance. There are limited North American data on EBV DNA testing. Our center has used EBV DNA testing since 2010. We hypothesized: (1) higher first post-RT EBV DNA level is associated with worse prognosis, and (2) surveillance EBV DNA is specific for recurrence at a low detection threshold.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients with non-metastatic (TNM-7 stage I-IVB) NPC treated with definitive RT/chemoRT (CRT) ± adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) between 2010-2017. EBV DNA was assayed by quantitative PCR in a CAP/CLIA-certified laboratory and reported in copies/mL of plasma. Pre-RT is defined as 0-90 days before the first RT fraction and post-RT within one year after RT. We report log odds ratios (LOR) from a linear model of T- and N-category with log-adjusted EBV DNA as the response variable. Survival outcomes were analyzed with log-rank tests and Cox multivariate analyses (MVA) adjusted for age, stage, and treatment, reporting hazard ratios (HR). A total of 95% confidence intervals of LOR and HR are reported. The detection threshold that maximized the F1 accuracy score was considered optimal.

RESULTS

Of 271 patients in the study window, 179 had pre-RT +/- post-RT EBV DNA testing. Six received RT, 43 CRT, and 130 CRT+AC. With 7-yr median follow-up, 37 recurred and 37 died. Detectable pre-RT EBV DNA was found in 154 (86%) with a median of 928 copies/mL (range: 1-239214). EBV DNA level correlated with higher N category (LOR: 0.28, 0.15-0.42, p<0.001), but not T category (0.04, -0.06-0.13, p = 0.5). Above-median pre-RT EBV DNA was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) by log-rank test (p = 0.016) and Cox MVA (HR: 2.2, 1.1-4.8, p = 0.03) along with N category, age, and no AC. Post-RT EBV DNA was available in 99 patients at a median of 54 days. RFS, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were worse in patients with detectable post-RT EBV DNA (Table). RFS and PFS drop further to 20% if EBV DNA was detectable after the full treatment (RT±AC, n = 71). In Cox MVA, post-RT EBV DNA remained independently prognostic (Table). EBV DNA was performed within 30 days of recurrence in 30 patients, and 24 were detectable (80% sensitivity). Conversely, of 152 patients without recurrence and at least 3-yr follow-up, 95 had post-RT EBV DNA testing and 84 were undetectable (88% specificity). An EBV DNA threshold of 31 copies maximized F1 accuracy metric, yielding 74% sensitivity and 97% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Pre-RT EBV DNA is prognostic and associated with higher N-category. Post-RT EBV DNA is a strong, independent predictor of RFS, PFS, and OS; 31 copies/mL may be a useful threshold to detect recurrence.

Dawn of Staging for Head and Neck Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Validation of the Novel 8th Edition AJCC T Classification and Proposed Stage Groupings

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

After decades of stagnation, the 8th edition TNM (TNM8) introduced a new T classification for head and neck (HN) soft tissue sarcomas (STS). New size cutoffs of 2 and 4 cm define T1-3, and a novel T4 category is defined by local invasion of adjoining structures. These size cutoffs had been chosen arbitrarily to advance data collection in this unique disease site since literature showed approximately 70% of HN STS did not reach the previous size threshold (5 cm) for the existing T1 category. The definition of the TNM8 T categories also align with mucosal HN cancers. No stage grouping for HN STS was defined since this new classification required more data collection to derive stage groups. This study aims to validate the TNM8 T classification and to propose stage groupings.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Clinical data of all adult (>16 years) HN STS patients treated from 1988 - 2019 with curative intent in our tertiary cancer center were retrieved from a prospective database, and supplemented with chart review. As per TNM8, cutaneous angiosarcoma, embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans were excluded due to their different behavior. Multivariate analysis (MVA) identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) were used to derive stage groupings. Stage grouping performance for OS was assessed and also compared against the existing TNM8 groups for non-HN STS.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients (N1: 2; M1: 2) were included. Of the 219 M0 patients, 63% were males; median tumor size was 3.0 cm (range: 0.3-14.0); the proportion of TNM8 T1-T4 were 35%, 34%, 26%, and 5%, respectively. Median follow up was 5.9 years. Five-year OS was 79%. MVA confirmed the prognostic value of T category (T4 HR 7.73, 95% CI 3.62-16.5) and grade (G2/3 vs G1 HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.82-7.53), in addition to age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04) (all p<0.001) for OS. AHR model derived T1-3_Grade 1 as stage 1; T1-3_Grade 2/3 as stage II; and T4_any Grade or any T_N1 as stage III (Table 1); the corresponding 5-year OS was 93%, 73%, and 38%, respectively. Both patients with M1 died within 1.5 years after diagnosis and M1 disease was designated stage IV. The AHR-grouping outperformed the RPA and non-HN TNM8 stage grouping for hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, percent variance explained, hazard difference, and sample size balance.

CONCLUSION

The novel T4 category introduced in TNM8 is associated with a >7 fold increased risk of death. Grade continues to be a critical prognostic factor in HN STS. The TNM8 HN STS T classifications have been validated, and the proposed new stage groupings with TNM8 incorporating grade have excellent performance for OS.

Outcomes after Contemporary Definitive Radiotherapy Alone in Patients with TNM-7 Stage III/IV Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

This study was undertaken to determine outcomes and prognostic factors of definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) alone for patients with TNM-7 stage III/IV HNSCC who did not receive concurrent chemotherapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We evaluated TNM-7 stage III/IV HNSCC patients treated with definitive IMRT alone in our institution from 2004-2019. Patients were reclassified according to TNM-8 staging. Stage II HPV+ oropharyngeal cancers (OPC) were subdivided into T1-2N2 and T3N0-2 for analysis. The rationale for chemotherapy omission was obtained retrospectively from clinical documentation. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated stratified by HPV status (determined by p16 staining, sometimes supplemented by HPV DNA testing). Multivariable analysis (MVA) identified prognostic factors for RFS and OS, taking into account stage and IMRT regimen. Age, performance status, and smoking were also examined for OS.

RESULTS

A total of 1083 patients were included (460 HPV+ and 623 HPV-). Reasons for omission of chemotherapy were: age >70 years or frailty (n = 551, 51%), cisplatin contraindication (n = 241, 22%), patient refusal (n = 106, 10%), and clinician's decision (n = 185, 17%). Median age was 67 years for HPV+ and 70 years for HPV- cohorts. IMRT mostly utilized altered fractionation regimens (n = 1016, 94%): moderately accelerated (Acc) (70 Gy/35 fractions [f]/6 weeks [w], 55%), hypofractionated (Hypo) (60 Gy/25f/5w, 14%), and hyperfractionated-accelerated (Hyper) (64 Gy/40f/4w, 25%). Median follow-up was 5 years. Five-year RFS and OS for HPV+ TNM-8 stage I/T1-2N2/T3N0-N2/III were 89%/86%/76%/52% and 83%/80%/64%/33% respectively (p<0.01). The same outcomes for HPV- TNM-8 stage III/IVA/IVB were 58%/52%/39% and 47%/27%/13%, respectively (p<0.01). MVA confirmed that HPV+ T3N0-2 subset within stage II and stage III (vs stage I) had lower RFS, and HPV- stage IVA and IVB (vs stage III) carried worse RFS and OS (Table).

CONCLUSION

Despite the retrospective nature and inherent selection bias, this large single institutional study shows that altered fractionated IMRT alone is an acceptable alternative for elderly, frail or cisplatin ineligible patients with HPV+ stage I/IIA (T1-2N2) OPC. Patients with HPV+ T3N0-2/stage III OPC and HPV- stage III/IV HNSCC have poor outcomes with IMRT alone and may benefit from alternative strategies.

The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Pre-Treatment Total Lymphocyte Count in HPV+ Oropharyngeal Carcinoma Receiving Definitive (Chemo-) Radiation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Evidence of prognostic importance of pre-radiotherapy (RT) total lymphocyte counts (TLC) and interaction with addition of cisplatin (CRT) in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma (HPV+OPC) is conflicting. Recent data suggest patients with high TLC may not benefit from the addition of chemotherapy (Price et al, JCO 2022). We assess the prognostic and predictive value of TLC in a large single center HPV+OCP cohort.

MATERIALS/METHODS

All HPV+OPC patients treated at a single academic center with definitive RT/CRT between 2005-2018 were included. Pre-treatment TLC up to 6 weeks prior to RT start were considered. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was applied to assess the prognostic importance of TLC (continuous variable), adjusted for age, gender, performance status, TNM-8 stage, and smoking status in the CRT and RT subgroups. The actuarial rates of locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier and competing risk methods, stratified by low vs high TLC (determined using Contal and O'Quigley method for optimal cutoff).

RESULTS

Among 1153 eligible patients, 707 (61%) were treated with CRT. Median age was 59.7 (range 22.7-92.2) years. 526 patients were (46%) TNM-8 stage I, 366 (32%) stage II and 261 (23%) stage III. Median TLC was 1.6 x 109/L (range 0.1-8.5). Median follow-up was 5.5 years. On MVA, TLC was prognostic for patients receiving CRT (OS [adjusted hazard ration (aHR) 0.55 (0.38-0.79), p = 0.002], DC [aHR 0.57 (0.37-0.88), p = 0.011], LRC [aHR 0.57 (0.36-0.89), p = 0.014]) but not RT (OS [aHR 1.04 (0.82-1.31), p = 0.74], LRC [aHR 1.26 (0.86-1.85), p = 0.23], DC [aHR 0.87 (0.64-1.19), p = 0.4)]. The optimal TLC cut-off for OS with CRT was 1.9 x 109/L. Low vs high TLC patients receiving CRT had significantly inferior 5-year DC (87% vs 93%, p = 0.017) and OS (84% vs 90%, p = 0.026). The benefit of higher TLC was most evident in stage II disease (table 1). CRT vs RT improved OS for stage II/III disease at high and low TLC.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment TLC is prognostic in a large cohort of HPV+OPC patients receiving CRT but not RT alone. Further investigation of the interaction of cisplatin and immune response during RT is warranted. The omission of chemotherapy based on TLC is not supported.

Outcomes of Head and Neck Cutaneous Angiosarcoma Treated in the IMRT Era

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Clinical behavior, natural history, and varied presentations of cutaneous angiosarcomas of the head and neck region (HN), in conjunction with its rarity, have rendered standardization of treatment elusive. We aimed to assess outcomes and patterns of failure for patients treated with surgery and radiation (Sx+RT), and radiation alone (RT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective review of all HN angiosarcoma patients amenable for upfront Sx or RT in our institution between 2004-2018 was completed. Generally, treatment included Sx when feasible, and RT for large or extensive/ill-defined tumors. Demographic, tumor characteristics, local (LC), regional (RC), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS), as well as patterns (in-field, marginal, out-of-field) of local failure at 5-year were estimated. Univariate analysis (UVA) was conducted to assess association with outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were eligible (14 Sx+RT and 19 RT). Tumor locations were: scalp (16, 48%). face (n = 12, 36%), and overlapping (5, 15%). Lesion types were: nodular (n = 23, 70%), flat (n = 4, 12%) and mixed (n = 6, 18%). Tumor size was larger in the RT group (median: 10.00 vs 2.85 cm, p<0.01). RT and Sx+RT patients had otherwise similar baseline characteristics: median age 74.3; male 70%; and ECOG performance status ≤1 85%. RT dose fractionations ranged from 50-70 Gy in 25-35 fractions in the RT group and 50-66 Gy in 25-33 fractions in the Sx+RT group. Four (12%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow up was 5.5 years. Five-year LC, RC, DC, and OS for RT vs Sx+RT groups were 68% vs 85% (p = 0.28); 95% vs 86% (p = 0.89); 79% vs 86% (p = 0.39); and 45% vs 55% (p = 0.71), respectively. The in-field/marginal/out-of-field local failure rate at 5 years were 16% vs 7% (p = 0.46), 26% vs 15% (p = 0.41), and 13% vs 0% (p = 0.24) for the RT vs Sx+RT groups, respectively. UVA showed that scalp location and ulceration/bleeding were strong adverse features for OS. Bone invasion was significantly associated with lower DC (Table). Lesion type (nodular/flat/mixed), tumor size, and treatment type (Sx+RT vs RT), were not significantly associated with LC or pattern of local failure.

CONCLUSION

Scalp tumors, as compared to face, portended poorer prognosis, and ulceration/bleeding and bone invasion were associated with increased distant metastases. Sx+RT was the preferred treatment modality when possible and typically used for smaller and better defined tumors. RT was reserved for larger and extensive/ill-defined disease; despite this, in the IMRT era, RT achieves reasonable rates of control, markedly superior to historical series.

Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Challenge in Patients With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy: The PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Fewer than 5% of patients labeled with a penicillin allergy are truly allergic. The standard of care to remove the penicillin allergy label in adults is specialized testing involving prick and intradermal skin testing followed by an oral challenge with penicillin. Skin testing is resource intensive, limits practice to specialist-trained physicians, and restricts the global population who could undergo penicillin allergy delabeling.

Objective

To determine whether a direct oral penicillin challenge is noninferior to the standard of care of penicillin skin testing followed by an oral challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This parallel, 2-arm, noninferiority, open-label, multicenter, international randomized clinical trial occurred in 6 specialized centers, 3 in North America (US and Canada) and 3 in Australia, from June 18, 2021, to December 2, 2022. Eligible adults had a PEN-FAST score lower than 3. PEN-FAST is a prospectively derived and internationally validated clinical decision rule that enables point-of-care risk assessment for adults reporting penicillin allergies.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to either direct oral challenge with penicillin (intervention arm) or a standard-of-care arm of penicillin skin testing followed by oral challenge with penicillin (control arm).

Main Outcome and Measure

The primary outcome was a physician-verified positive immune-mediated oral penicillin challenge within 1 hour postintervention in the intention-to-treat population. Noninferiority was achieved if a 1-sided 95% CI of the risk difference (RD) did not exceed 5 percentage points (pp).

Results

A total of 382 adults were randomized, with 377 patients (median [IQR] age, 51 [35-65] years; 247 [65.5%] female) included in the analysis: 187 in the intervention group and 190 in the control group. Most patients had a PEN-FAST score of 0 or 1. The primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.5%) in the intervention group and 1 patient (0.5%) in the control group, with an RD of 0.0084 pp (90% CI, -1.22 to 1.24 pp). The 1-sided 95% CI was below the noninferiority margin of 5 pp. In the 5 days following the oral penicillin challenge, 9 immune-mediated adverse events were recorded in the intervention group and 10 in the control group (RD, -0.45 pp; 95% CI, -4.87 to 3.96 pp). No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, direct oral penicillin challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy was noninferior compared with standard-of-care skin testing followed by oral challenge. In patients with a low-risk history, direct oral penicillin challenge is a safe procedure to facilitate the removal of a penicillin allergy label.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04454229.

The Who, What, When, and Where of Inpatient Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge-Implications for Health Services Implementation

Inpatient direct oral challenge programs are increasingly deployed as part of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives to reduce the burden and impacts of penicillin allergy labels on antibiotic prescribing. Using data from a prospective, multicenter cohort inpatient penicillin allergy program, we identify the key targets for delabeling to aid health service implementation.

The Potential Impact and Usability of the Eighth Edition TNM Staging Classification in Oral Cavity Cancer

AIMS

In the current eighth edition head and neck TNM staging, extranodal extension (ENE) is an adverse feature in oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OSCC). The previous seventh edition N1 with ENE is now staged as N2a. Seventh edition N2+ with ENE is staged as N3b in the eighth edition. We evaluated its potential impact on patients treated with surgery and postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OSCC patients treated with primary surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy between January 2005 and December 2014 were reviewed. Cohorts with pathological node-negative (pN-), pathological node-positive without ENE (pN+_pENE-) and pathological node-positive with ENE (pN+_pENE+) diseases were compared for local control, regional control, distant control and overall survival. The pN+ cohorts were further stratified into seventh edition N-staging subgroups for outcomes comparison.

RESULTS

In total, 478 patients were evaluated: 173 pN-; 159 pN+_pENE-; 146 pN+_pENE+. Outcomes at 5 years were: local control was identical (78%) in all cohorts (P = 0.892), whereas regional control was 91%, 80% and 68%, respectively (P < 0.001). Distant control was 97%, 87%, 68% (P < 0.001) and overall survival was 75%, 53% and 39% (P < 0.001), respectively. Overall survival for N1 and N2a subgroups was not significantly different. In the seventh edition N2b subgroup of pENE- (n = 79) and pENE+ (n = 79) cohorts, overall survival was 67% and 37%, respectively. In the seventh edition N2c subgroups, overall survival for pENE- (n = 17) and pENE+ (n = 38) cohorts was 65% and 35% (P = 0.08), respectively. Overall, an additional 128 patients (42% pN+) were upstaged as N3b.

CONCLUSIONS

When eighth edition staging was applied, stage migration across the N2-3 categories resulted in expected larger separations of overall survival by stage. Patients treated with primary radiation without surgical staging should have outcomes carefully monitored. Strategies to predict ENE preoperatively and trials to improve the outcomes of pENE+ patients should be explored.

Phase I trial of alpelisib in combination with concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Deregulation of the PI3K signalling pathway is frequent in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and may be implicated in radioresistance. We report on the results from a phase I 3 + 3 dose escalation study of alpelisib, a class I α-specific PI3K inhibitor in combination with concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN (LA-SCCHN).

METHODS

Eligible patients had previously untreated LA-SCCHN and were candidates for CRT. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Alpelisib was given orally once daily at two dose levels: 200 mg and 250 mg. CRT consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m² IV every three weeks and standard fractionation radiotherapy (IMRT) 70 Gy in 35 fractions.

RESULTS

Nine patients were enrolled (six alpelisib 200 mg, three 250 mg). Oropharynx was the primary site in all patients (seven p16-positive; five T1-2N2M0, four T3-4N2-3M0 [AJCC 7th edition]). All patients completed CRT within seven weeks. Grade 3 alpelisib-related toxicities occurred in four patients. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at 200 mg among three DLT-evaluable patients. Two of two DLT-evaluable patients treated at 250 mg experienced DLTs (inability to complete ≥75% alpelisib secondary to radiation dermatitis and febrile neutropenia). Thus, RP2D was declared at 200 mg. After median follow-up of 39.7 months, two patients developed pulmonary metastases despite locoregional control. Three-year overall survival was 77.8% (95% CI 36.5%-93.9%).

CONCLUSION

Alpelisib at 200 mg has a manageable safety profile in combination with cisplatin-based CRT in LA-SCCHN.

Organizational guidance for the care of patients with head-and-neck cancer in Ontario

Background

At the request of the Head and Neck Cancers Advisory Committee of Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), a working group and expert panel of clinicians with expertise in the management of head-and-neck cancer developed the present guideline. The purpose of the guideline is to provide advice about the organization and delivery of health care services for adult patients with head-and-neck cancer.

Methods

This document updates the recommendations published in the Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) 2009 organizational guideline The Management of Head and Neck Cancer in Ontario. The guideline development methods included an updated literature search, internal review by content and methodology experts, and external review by relevant health care providers and potential users.

Results

To ensure that all patients have access to the highest standard of care available in Ontario, the guideline establishes the minimum requirements to maintain a head-and-neck disease site program. Recommendations are made about the membership of core and extended provider teams, minimum skill sets and experience of practitioners, cancer centre-specific and practitioner-specific volumes, multidisciplinary care requirements, and unique infrastructure demands.

Conclusions

The recommendations contained in this document offer guidance for clinicians and institutions providing care for patients with head-and-neck cancer in Ontario, and for policymakers and other stakeholders involved in the delivery of health care services for head-and-neck cancer.

Development and validation of a clinical prediction-score model for distant metastases in major salivary gland carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The most common pattern of failure in major salivary gland carcinoma (SGC) is development of distant metastases (DMs). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a prediction score for DM in SGC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with SGC treated curatively at four tertiary cancer centers were divided into discovery (n = 619) and validation cohorts (n = 416). Multivariable analysis using competing risk regression was used to identify predictors of DM in the discovery cohort and create a prediction score of DM; the optimal score cut-off was determined using a minimal P value approach. The prediction score was subsequently evaluated in the validation cohort. The cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyze DM and overall survival (OS), respectively.

RESULTS

In the discovery cohort, DM predictors (risk coefficient) were: positive margin (0.6), pT3-4 (0.7), pN+ (0.7), lymphovascular invasion (0.8), and high-risk histology (1.2). High DM-risk SGC was defined by sum of coefficients greater than two. In the discovery cohort, the 5-year incidence of DM for high- versus low-risk SGC was 50% versus 8% (P < 0.01); this was similar in the validation cohort (44% versus 4%; P < 0.01). In the pooled cohorts, this model performed similarly in predicting distant-only failure (40% versus 6%, P < 0.01) and late (>2 years post surgery) DM (22% versus 4%; P < 0.01). Patients with high-risk SGC had an increased incidence of DM in the subgroup receiving postoperative radiation therapy (46% versus 8%; P < 0.01). The 5-year OS for high- versus low-risk SGC was 48% versus 92% (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This validated prediction-score model may be used to identify SGC patients at increased risk for DM and select those who may benefit from prospective evaluation of treatment intensification and/or surveillance strategies.

HPV Status Improves Classification of Head and Neck Gray Zone Cancers

In epidemiologic studies, patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are classified mainly by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. However, some patients are of an unclear subsite, the “gray zone” cases, which could reflect ICD coding error, absence of primary subsite, or extensive primary tumors that cross over multiple subsites of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Patients with gray zone squamous cell carcinomas were compared with patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status that was determined by p16 immunostaining or HPV serology. Comparisons consisted of clinicodemographic features and prognostic outcomes presented by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models, reported as hazard ratios. There were 158 consecutive patients with gray zone HNSCC diagnosed at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center between 2006 and 2017: 66 had subsite coding discrepancies against the clinician’s documentation (“discrepant” cases; e.g., the diagnosis by the clinician was OSCC, while the classification by ICD coding was OPSCC), while 92 were squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary of the head and neck (SCCUPHN) after complete diagnostic workup. Comparators included 721 consecutive OSCC and 938 OPSCC adult cases. All HPV-positive cohorts (OPSCC, discrepant, and SCCUPHN) had similar clinicodemographic characteristics and better 3- and 5-y overall survival and disease-free survival than their HPV-negative counterparts. In contrast, HPV-negative discrepant cases had prognostic outcomes most similar to HPV-negative OPSCC cases, while HPV-negative SCCUPHN had survival outcomes most similar to those of patients with OSCC in this study. HPV-positive status can improve the classification of patients with unclear or discrepant oral/oropharyngeal subsite, an improvement over classification systems that are solely clinician defined or conducted through ICD coding. However, due to clinical practice, we could not make definitive reclassification for patients with HPV-negative gray zone HNSCC.

Intrapartum Group B Streptococcus Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Penicillin Allergic Pregnant Women

Objectives  To estimate the prevalence of and identify modifiable risk factors for alternative antibiotics for group B Streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic women. Methods  Retrospective cohort study of pregnant women within a health care network from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017. Included women were GBS colonized, delivered at ≥ 37 weeks' gestation, and reported penicillin/cephalosporin allergy. The primary outcome was the use of alternate antibiotics GBS prophylaxis, defined per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines as antibiotics other than penicillin, ampicillin, or cefazolin. Results  We identified 190 GBS-colonized pregnant women self-reporting a penicillin/cephalosporin allergy; 5% reported anaphylaxis, 44% high-risk symptoms (isolated hives, shortness of breath, swelling, or vomiting), and 51% low-risk symptoms (isolated rash, itching, or nausea). Two-thirds (63%) had alternative antibiotic prophylaxis. In adjusted analyses, nonwhite race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-4.94) and high-risk allergic reaction (aOR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.30-4.49) were associated with higher odds of alternative antibiotics prophylaxis compared with low-risk allergic reaction. Low-risk allergic reaction group was less likely to receive alternative antibiotic prophylaxis (aOR: 0.36; 95 CI%: 0.19-0.66). Conclusion  Alternative antibiotic use for GBS prophylaxis is frequent with penicillin/cephalosporin allergies. Efforts to confirm allergy and perform penicillin hypersensitivity testing may increase compliance with guidelines for antibiotic administration.

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) in systemic lupus erythematosus: relation to disease activity, organ damage and immunological findings

Background Insulin growth factor-1 (IGF1) activates cell proliferation pathways and inhibits apoptosis. IGF1 is involved in tumour growth and required for T-cell independent activation of B cells. Activated B cells and autoantibody production are a hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To investigate the possible role of IGF1 in SLE, we studied IGF1 across clinical characteristics, immunological biomarkers, disease activity and organ damage in SLE patients. Method In a cross-sectional study, we collected clinical characteristics, medication, disease activity (SLEDAI-2K) and organ damage (SDI) for 94 SLE patients. Autoantibodies and cytokines were measured by ELISA, and levels of IGF1 and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) by chemiluminescence. Free IGF1 was estimated by the IGF1:IGFBP3 ratio. Healthy controls served as a comparator group. Results There was a significant age-related decline in IGF1, IGFBP3 and free IGF1 (IGF1:IGFBP3 ratio) that was similar in SLE patients and controls with very few outliers. Free IGF1 was inversely related to blood pressure (Rs -0.327, p < 0.01) and HbA1c (Rs -0.31, p < 0.01). Free IGF1 was higher in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-treated patients ( p < 0.01), but there was no significant association between the IGF1 axis and autoantibody profiles, cytokine levels or SLEDAI-2K or SDI categories. IGF1 correlated inversely with BAFF level and B, natural killer and CD8 + cell counts. Conclusion Free IGF1 levels in SLE patients declined appropriately with age. IGF1 levels were not associated with disease activity, severity or autoantibody levels in SLE. Free IGF1 had positive metabolic effects in SLE and may play an indirect role in dampening the cellular immune response by downregulating B- and T-cell activity.

Socioeconomic status, human papillomavirus, and overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in Toronto, Canada

BACKGROUND

Despite universal healthcare in some countries, lower socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with worse cancer survival. The influence of SES on head and neck cancer (HNC) survival is of immense interest, since SES is associated with the risk and prognostic factors associated with this disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Newly diagnosed HNC patients from 2003 to 2010 (n=2124) were identified at Toronto's Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Principal component analysis was used to calculate a composite score using neighbourhood-level SES variables obtained from the 2006 Canada Census. Associations of SES with overall survival were evaluated in HNC subsets and by p16 status (surrogate for human papillomavirus).

RESULTS

SES score was higher for oral cavity (n=423) and p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC, n=404) patients compared with other disease sites. Lower SES was associated with worse survival [HR 1.14 (1.06-1.22), p=0.0002], larger tumor staging (p<0.001), current smoking (p<0.0001), heavier alcohol consumption (p<0.0001), and greater comorbidity (p<0.0002), but not with treatment regimen (p>0.20). After adjusting for age, sex, and stage, the lowest SES quintile was associated with the worst survival only for OPC patients [HR 1.66 (1.09-2.53), n=832], primarily in the p16-negative subset [HR 1.63 (0.96-2.79)]. The predictive ability of the prognostic models improved when smoking/alcohol was added to the model (c-index 0.71 vs. 0.69), but addition of SES did not (c-index 0.69).

CONCLUSION

SES was associated with survival, but this effect was lost after accounting for other factors (age, sex, TNM stage, smoking/alcohol). Lower SES was associated with greater smoking, alcohol consumption, comorbidity, and stage.