Pretreatment motivation and therapy outcomes in eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Identifying modifiable predictors of outcomes following treatment for eating disorders may help to tailor interventions to patients' individual needs, improve treatment efficacy, and develop new interventions. The goal of this meta-analysis was to quantify the association between pretreatment motivation and posttreatment changes in eating disorder symptomology.

METHOD

We reviewed 196 longitudinal studies reporting on change on indices of overall eating-disorder symptomatology, weight gain, binge-eating, vomiting, anxiety/depression, and treatment adherence. Meta-analyses were performed using two complementary approaches: (a) combined probability analysis using the added Z's method; (b) effect size analyses. Using random-effect models, effect sizes were pooled when there were at least three studies with the same type of statistical design and reporting statistics on the same outcome. Heterogeneity in study outcome was evaluated using Q and I² statistics. Studies were reviewed qualitatively when the number of studies or reported data were insufficient to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-two articles were included. Although samples and treatments differed substantially across studies, results across studies were remarkably consistent. Both combined-probability and effect-size analyses indicated positive effects of pretreatment motivation on improvement in general eating-disorder symptoms (Cohen's r = .17), and an absence of effects on anxiety/depression symptoms. Remaining outcome indices were subject to selective reporting and/or small sample size bias.

DISCUSSION

Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating treatment engagement approaches in the treatment of eating disorders. Optimal reporting of study findings and improving study quality would improve future efforts to obtain an in-depth understanding of the relationship between motivation and eating disorder symptoms.

Psychometric properties of the "Autonomous and Controlled Motivation for Treatment Questionnaire" in women with eating disorders

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Autonomous and Controlled Motivation for Treatment Questionnaire (ACMTQ) for use in women with an eating disorder (ED).

METHOD

Data were available for 463 individuals. We assessed factor structure, internal reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent/divergent validity, and incremental predictive validity.

RESULTS

Our data showed acceptable fit to our hypothesized model (comparative fit index = 0.92, root mean square error of approximation = 0.09, standardized root mean square residual = 0.09). We found test-retest reliability of 0.73 for both the autonomous (α = 0.85) and controlled (α = 0.80) subscales. Autonomous scores were more strongly associated with motivation measures (β = 0.37; 0.46) than with ED severity measures (β = -0.10; -0.18). Associations between autonomous motivation and symptom improvement over time supported predictive validity. Controlled motivation was associated with lower motivation (β = 0.02; -0.31) and with higher ED severity (β = 0.12; 0.47).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the ACMTQ is valid for use in women with EDs and lend support to the validity of findings from previous ED studies that have used the ACMTQ.

Prognostic value of autonomous and controlled motivation in outpatient eating-disorder treatment

According to Self-Determination Theory, when motivation to reach an objective is fully internal, it is said to be "autonomous"; when driven by external incentives, it is said to be "controlled". Previous research has indicated that autonomously motivated individuals show better response to treatments for eating disorders.

OBJECTIVE

In individuals undergoing different intensities of outpatient treatment for an eating disorder, we sought to assess associations between autonomous and controlled motivations and response to treatment on the one hand, and likelihood of dropping out of treatment, on the other.

METHOD

Seven hundred seventy adults meeting DSM-5 criteria for an eating disorder (216 with Anorexia Nervosa, 282 with Bulimia Nervosa, and 272 with Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder) were included in this study. Before an interval of outpatient treatment, individuals completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and the Autonomous and Controlled Motivations for Treatment Questionnaire. Participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire again at one or two subsequent timepoints.

RESULTS

After controlling for diagnosis, treatment intensity, and number of previous treatments, analyses showed that higher autonomous motivation was associated with better response on eating-disorder overall symptoms and lower likelihood of dropping out of treatment. In contrast, controlled motivation was not associated with response to treatment.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that autonomous motivation has trans-diagnostic influence upon response to various intensities of treatment for an eating disorder. In support of an autonomy supportive approach to treatment, findings link autonomous motivation with more favorable outcome.

Autonomy support and autonomous motivation in the outpatient treatment of adults with an eating disorder

OBJECTIVE

Across diverse clinical problems, therapists' autonomy support has been found to increase patients' autonomous motivation for change. Being self-motivated has, in turn, been linked to superior treatment response. In people undergoing outpatient eating disorder (ED) treatment, we examined associations among ratings of autonomy support received from therapists and other carers, self-reported engagement in therapy, and clinical outcomes.

METHOD

Ninety-seven women with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or a related ED provided measures of motivational status and clinical symptoms at the beginning and end of time-limited (12-16 weeks) segments of specialized treatment. At mid-treatment, patients also rated the extent to which they perceived their individual therapists, group therapists, group-therapy peers, family members, friends, and romantic partners as being autonomy supportive.

RESULTS

Overall, multiple regression analyses indicated autonomy support to moderate (rather than mediate) the link between initial autonomous motivation and later change in autonomous motivation-with results indicating that, independently of ED diagnosis or treatment intensity, greater perceived autonomy support (from therapists and nontherapists alike) coincided with larger increases in autonomous motivation over the course of therapy. In turn, higher autonomous motivation at end-of-therapy coincided with larger reductions in eating symptoms.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest that the experience of autonomy support (from therapists and nontherapists) is associated with increasing motivation in people undergoing ED treatment, and that becoming self-motivated is linked to better outcomes. Such results indicate that support from therapists, relatives, and peers can favorably influence personal engagement in individuals undergoing ED treatment.

Does level of motivation for change impact post-treatment outcomes in the eating disorders? Protocol for a systematic review with quantitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Eating Disorders are highly prevalent and widespread mental health problems, with marked risk of chronicity and refractoriness to treatment. Affected individuals are hesitant to change their behaviours and therefore struggle to maintain motivation for therapy. This review aims to produce the first high-quality meta-analysis of the literature on the impact of level of motivation for change on post-treatment outcomes in anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED).

METHODS

A systematic review will be conducted using Cochrane library, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsychINFO. Research registrars and bibliographies of included articles will be screened, and experts will be contacted. The search strategy consists of terms related to eating disorders, motivation, and outcome. Randomized controlled trials, clinical controlled trials, time series, and before-after studies will be included. Participants will be adolescents and adults who are diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder or OSFED and who are entering psychotherapy treatment. The predictor studied is defined as motivation for change at the beginning of treatment. The primary outcome will be an overall change in eating-disorder symptomatology at the end of treatment and at less than, and over 6-month follow-up. Other outcomes of interest include change in restricting, binging, and compensatory behaviours, change in shape, weight and eating concerns, change in psychiatric comorbidities, weight restoration, and dropout rates. Articles will be selected, data will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be assessed by independent reviewers using forms pre-created on Eppi-Reviewer 4 software. Results will be combined using a random-effects model. Studies of all sizes and qualities will be included in the analyses. Heterogeneity will be examined by funnel plot, Cochran's Q, and I² statistic. Sensitivity analyses will be performed to account for clinical and methodological differences across studies.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will help determine the predictive value of motivation for change on treatment outcomes in eating disorders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Our systematic review protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42016035285). All modifications will be available on the PROSPERO website, along with the dates, a description, and a justification.

Use of the "crash room" in a rural hospital: case review of 100 cases

INTRODUCTION

There is little published literature about the characteristics of patients with high triage levels seen in the emergency departments of rural hospitals. We sought to determine the demographics of patients brought into the "crash room" of a rural hospital, to assess the pathologies that brought them to the hospital and to study their final disposition.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of visits to the crash room of our rural hospital. We used the hospital's crash room register to compile a list of the last 100 consecutive visits to the crash room as of July 20, 2011. We extracted initial data from the register and additional data by chart review.

RESULTS

Patients with triage levels 1 to 3 were brought to the crash room at a rate of 0.36 cases/wk/1000 population. Although circulatory disease, respiratory disease and "chest pain" accounted for 44.6% of final diagnoses, a wide range of pathology was seen in the crash room. Trauma and poisonings, and mental disorders accounted for 21.0% and 9.0% of diagnoses, respectively. The final diagnosis was nonspecific, vague or "unknown" in 20% of the visits. Of the crash room cases, 17% required transfer to a secondary care hospital.

CONCLUSION

Crash room visits in this rural hospital occurred at a rate of 0.48 cases/wk/1000 population. Most patients seen in the crash room were not given the traditional triage levels 1 or 2 that are usually associated with crash room care. The final diagnosis was nonspecific in 17.0% of cases, and mental disorders accounted for 9.0% of crash room visits.