[Development and evaluation of complex interventions in nursing : Application of the medical research council's framework using the example of interventions to prevent physical restraints]

Many nursing interventions are complex. They comprise different intervention elements (components) and aim to change processes or behaviours of individuals or groups. A framework of the British Medical Research Council comprises methodological recommendations for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. This narrative review describes the framework's methodological recommendations using an example of interventions to reduce physical restraints in hospital and long-term care settings, such as bedrails or belts in chairs and beds. In addition to the characteristics of the complex interventions, the development and theoretical foundation of the interventions as well as the feasibility test and evaluation is described.

Family Conferences to Facilitate Deprescribing in Older Outpatients With Frailty and With Polypharmacy: The COFRAIL Cluster Randomized Trial

Importance

For older adults with frailty syndrome, reducing polypharmacy may have utility as a safety-promoting treatment option.

Objective

To investigate the effects of family conferences on medication and clinical outcomes in community-dwelling older adults with frailty receiving polypharmacy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 30, 2019, to June 30, 221, at 110 primary care practices in Germany. The study included community-dwelling adults aged 70 years or older with frailty syndrome, daily use of at least 5 different medications, a life expectancy of at least 6 months, and no moderate or severe dementia.

Interventions

General practitioners (GPs) in the intervention group received 3 training sessions on family conferences, a deprescribing guideline, and a toolkit with relevant nonpharmacologic interventions. Three GP-led family conferences for shared decision-making involving the participants and family caregivers and/or nursing services were subsequently held per patient at home over a period of 9 months. Patients in the control group received care as usual.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the number of hospitalizations within 12 months, as assessed by nurses during home visits or telephone interviews. Secondary outcomes included the number of medications, the number of European Union list of the number of potentially inappropriate medication (EU[7]-PIM) for older people, and geriatric assessment parameters. Both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.

Results

The baseline assessment included 521 individuals (356 women [68.3%]; mean [SD] age, 83.5 [6.17] years). The intention-to-treat analysis with 510 patients showed no significant difference in the adjusted mean (SD) number of hospitalizations between the intervention group (0.98 [1.72]) and the control group (0.99 [1.53]). In the per-protocol analysis including 385 individuals, the mean (SD) number of medications decreased from 8.98 (3.56) to 8.11 (3.21) at 6 months and to 8.49 (3.63) at 12 months in the intervention group and from 9.24 (3.44) to 9.32 (3.59) at 6 months and to 9.16 (3.42) at 12 months in the control group, with a statistically significant difference at 6 months in the mixed-effect Poisson regression model (P = .001). After 6 months, the mean (SD) number of EU(7)-PIMs was significantly lower in the intervention group (1.30 [1.05]) than in the control group (1.71 [1.25]; P = .04). There was no significant difference in the mean number of EU(7)-PIMs after 12 months.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cluster randomized clinical trial with older adults taking 5 or more medications, the intervention consisting of GP-led family conferences did not achieve sustainable effects in reducing the number of hospitalizations or the number of medications and EU(7)-PIMs after 12 months.

Trial Registration

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00015055.

Prevention of physical restraints in the acute care setting (PROTECT): study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Physical restraints (PR) are regularly used in acute care settings, although evidence for their effectiveness and safety (eg, for prevention of falls) is lacking. Their use is associated with adverse events, such as decreased mobility and injuries for patients. We developed a complex intervention to prevent PR in acute care settings according to the UK Medical Research Council Framework, and investigated the feasibility. The intervention comprised the qualification of key nurses as multipliers and a short interprofessional information session. The intervention has proven to be feasible. It also became apparent that further development of the intervention and the study procedures is necessary. Therefore, this study aims to refine and pilot the complex intervention. Furthermore, the objective of this pilot study is to improve study procedures.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In a preparatory phase, we will conduct focus groups and individual interviews with the target groups to explore the possibilities for adaption of the intervention and implementation strategies. Subsequently, a cluster-randomised controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up period will be conducted. It is planned to recruit eight general hospitals in Germany (area of Halle (Saale) and Leipzig) with 28 wards and 924 patients per observation period (2772 overall). Primary outcome is the proportion of patients with at least one PR after 6 months. Data will be collected by direct observation over a period of seven consecutive days and three times a day. Secondary outcomes are falls, interruptions in therapy and prescription of psychotropic medication. A comprehensive process evaluation will accompany the study.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Halle (Saale) approved the study protocol. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. Study information and additional material will be freely available on an already existing website.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00027989.

Development of a shared decision-making intervention to improve drug safety and to reduce polypharmacy in frail elderly patients living at home

Objectives

For patients with geriatric frailty, reducing inappropriate medication is an important goal to improve patient safety in primary care. GP-side barriers include knowledge gaps, legal concerns, and lack of communication between the actors involved. The aim was to develop a multi-faceted intervention to facilitate deprescribing and shared prioritisation among frail elderlies with polypharmacy living at home.

Methods

Mixed methods study including: 1) scoping review on family conferences, expert panels; 2) group discussions with GPs, mapping of needs and challenges in Primary Care; 3) workshops and expert interviews with GPs, patient advocates, researchers as a basis for a theoretical intervention model; 4) piloting.

Results

A major challenge for GPs is to conduct a productive discussion with patients and family cares on deprescribing and drug safety. A guideline for a structured family conference with a medication check and geriatric assessment was developed and proved to be feasible in the pilot study.

Conclusion

The intervention developed to facilitate deprescribing and shared prioritisation of drug therapy based on family conferences seems suitable to be tested in a subsequent cRCT.

Innovation

Adapting family conferences to primary care for frail patients with polypharmacy.

Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints of older people in general hospital settings

BACKGROUND

Physical restraints, such as bedrails, belts in chairs or beds, and fixed tables, are commonly used for older people in general hospital settings. Reasons given for using physical restraints are to prevent falls and fall-related injuries, to control challenging behavior (such as agitation or wandering), and to ensure the delivery of medical treatments. Clear evidence of their effectiveness is lacking, and potential harms are recognised, including injuries associated with the use of physical restraints and a negative impact on people's well-being. There are widespread recommendations that their use should be reduced or eliminated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the best evidence for the effects and safety of interventions aimed at preventing and reducing the use of physical restraint of older people in general hospital settings. To describe the content, components and processes of these interventions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's register, MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), LILACS (BIREME), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's meta-register the International Clinical Trials Registry Portal on 20 April 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials that investigated the effects of interventions that aimed to prevent or reduce the use of physical restraints in general hospital settings. Eligible settings were acute care and rehabilitation wards. We excluded emergency departments, intensive care and psychiatric units, as well as the use of restrictive measures for penal reasons (e.g. prisoners in general medical wards). We included studies with a mean age of study participants of at least 65 years. Control groups received usual care or active control interventions that were ineligible for inclusion as experimental interventions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected the articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of all included studies. Data were unsuitable for meta-analysis, and we reported results narratively. We used GRADE methods to describe our certainty in the results.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four studies: two randomised controlled trials (one individually-randomised, parallel-group trial and one clustered, stepped-wedge trial) and two controlled clinical trials (both with a clustered design). One study was conducted in general medical wards in Canada and three studies were conducted in rehabilitation hospitals in Hong Kong. A total of 1709 participants were included in three studies; in the fourth study the number of participants was not reported. The mean age ranged from 67 years to 84 years. The duration of follow-up covered the period of patients' hospitalisation in one study (21 days average length of stay) and ranged from 4 to 11 months in the other studies. The definition of physical restraints differed slightly, and one study did not include bedrails. Three studies investigated organisational interventions aimed at implementing a least-restraint policy to reduce physical restraints. The theoretical approach of the interventions and the content of the educational components was comparable across studies. The fourth study investigated the use of pressure sensors for participants with an increased falls risk, which gave an alarm if the participant left the bed or chair. Control groups in all studies received usual care. Three studies were at high risk of selection bias and risk of detection bias was unclear in all studies. Because of very low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the effect of organisational interventions aimed at implementing a least-restraint policy on our primary efficacy outcome: the use of physical restraints in general hospital settings. One study found an increase in the number of participants with at least one physical restraint in the intervention and control groups, one study found a small reduction in both groups, and in the third study (the stepped-wedge study), the number of participants with at least one physical restraint decreased in all clusters after implementation of the intervention but no detailed information was reported. For the use of bed or chair pressure sensor alarms for people with an increased fall risk, we found moderate-certainty evidence of little to no effect of the intervention on the number of participants with at least one physical restraint compared with usual care. None of the studies systematically assessed adverse events related to use of physical restraint use, e.g. direct injuries, or reported such events. We are uncertain about the effect of organisational interventions aimed at implementing a least-restraint policy on the number of participants with at least one fall (very low-certainty evidence), and there was no evidence that organisational interventions or the use of bed or chair pressure sensor alarms for people with an increased fall risk reduce the number of falls (low-certainty evidence from one study each). None of the studies reported fall-related injuries. We found low-certainty evidence that organisational interventions may result in little to no difference in functioning (including mobility), and moderate-certainty evidence that the use of bed or chair pressure sensor alarms has little to no effect on mobility. We are uncertain about the effect of organisational interventions on the use of psychotropic medication; one study found no difference in the prescription of psychotropic medication. We are uncertain about the effect of organisational interventions on nurses' attitudes and knowledge about the use of physical restraints (very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain whether organisational interventions aimed at implementing a least-restraint policy can reduce physical restraints in general hospital settings. The use of pressure sensor alarms in beds or chairs for people with an increased fall risk has probably little to no effect on the use of physical restraints. Because of the small number of studies and the study limitations, the results should be interpreted with caution. Further research on effective strategies to implement a least-restraint policy and to overcome barriers to physical restraint reduction in general hospital settings is needed.

Increased Drug Intoxications Seen in Heart Transplant Donors During COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose

The majority of heart transplant centers decline heart donors with known or suspected COVID-19. In addition to impacting donor utilization, we hypothesize that the COVID pandemic is associated with increased number of drug intoxication in heart donors.

Methods

The COVID pandemic was declared on March 11^th, 2020. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient was analyzed during two 15-month eras: era 1 was defined as January 1^st2019 - March 30^th, 2020 and era 2 was defined as March 31^th, 2020 - June 30th 2021. Donor populations are described by era and UNOS region. T-test was used for trend analysis.

Results

Era 1 identified 7,649 donor hearts and era 2 identified 8,475 donor hearts. There was a significant increase of 577 (45.2%) heart donors with drug intoxication identified as the cause of death from era 1 to era 2 (p<0.0001, Figure 1). There was an increase in heart donors from drug intoxication cross all UNOS regions, but the greatest increase was seen in UNOS region 5 (120.3%) followed by region 7 (69.1%) and region 4 (61.4%) (Figure 2).

Conclusion

More donor hearts were recovered for transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a notable increase in those who died from drug intoxication. This finding may reflect a psychosocial effect of the pandemic on the general population that has impacted the field of heart transplantation.

Health policy analysis on barriers and facilitators for better oral health in German care homes: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

To assess possible health policy interventions derived from the theoretical domains framework (TDF) by studying barriers and facilitators on the delivery of oral healthcare and oral hygiene in German care homes using a behavioural change framework.

DESIGN

Qualitative correlational study to evaluate a national intervention programme.

SETTING

Primary healthcare in two care homes in rural Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven stakeholders participating in the delivery of oral healthcare (hygiene, treatment) to older people, including two care home managers, four section managers, two nurses/carers and three dentists.

INTERVENTIONS

Semistructured interviews conducted in person in the care homes or by phone. A questionnaire developed along the domains of the TDF and the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations influencing Behaviours model was used to guide the interviews. Interviews were transcribed and systematised using Mayring's content analysis along the TDF.

RESULTS

860 statements were collected. We identified 19 barriers, facilitators and conflicting themes related to capabilities, 34 to opportunities and 24 to motivation. The lack of access to professional dental care was confirmed by all stakeholders as a major limitation hampering better oral health.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

A range of interventions can be discussed with the methodology we utilised. In our interviews, lack of dentists willing to treat patients at these facilities was the most discussed barrier for improving oral health of nursing home residents.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Dentists highlighted the need for better incentives and facilities to deliver oral healthcare in these institutions. Differences with urban settings regarding access to healthcare were frequently discussed by our study participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Within our sample, greater capacitation of care home staff, better financial incentives for dentists and increased cooperation between the two stakeholders should be considered when designing interventions to tackle oral health of care home residents in Germany.

Determining degradation kinetics, byproducts and toxicity for the reductive treatment of Nitroguanidine (NQ) by magnesium-based bimetal Mg/Cu

Energetic-laden process water from industrial munition facilities can be treated by zero-valent metals (ZVMs) or zero-valent iron (ZVI) to remove residual energetics. This reduction-based treatment is significantly enhanced with the addition of a secondary catalytic metal (i.e. forming a bimetal reagent). The reagent is further enhanced by using a more reductive base metal, such as Mg. In this work, the reductive degradation of nitroguanidine (NQ) in aqueous solutions by Mg/Cu bimetal is investigated. Two initial pH conditions (unadjusted and pH 2.7) were studied. Under unadjusted initial pH conditions, 90% of NQ degraded within 30 min reaction time. After 150 min, NQ degradation generated a suite of products including guanidine (44%), cyanamide (31%), formamide (15%), aminoguanidine (AQ) (6%), urea (2%) and cyanoguanidine (0.03%), leading to 100.0% carbon closure when accounting for residual NQ. The experimentally-derived degradation reaction pathway consisted of two parallel reactions: nitroreduction led to formation of AQ with further degradation to urea, cyanamide and formamide, or reductive cleavage of the N-N bond led to guanidine formation. Toxicological assessments indicated only cyanamide and AQ were toxic to S. obliquus at certain concentrations. A lowered initial pH promoted AQ transformation to benign formamide, thus reducing toxicity and complexity of products.

[Development and feasibility of an intervention to reduce physical restraints in hospitals: A mixed methods study]

Development and feasibility of an intervention to reduce physical restraints in hospitals: A mixed methods study Abstract. Background: Physical restraints (PR) are regularly used in people with dementia or delirium in general hospital settings. There is no clear evidence for the effectiveness of PR, but their use is associated with an increased risk for harm. Therefore, a restraint-free care is recommended. Aim: Development and feasibility test of an intervention to reduce PR in general hospital settings. Methods: Systematic literature reviews and theory-guided modelling of an intervention involving relevant clinical stakeholders and mixed methods study in two wards of a university hospital (geriatric traumatology and neurology). Results: The complex intervention comprises the following components: qualification of multipliers, interprofessional education about PR reduction, regular audit and feedback meetings, and the support regarding the aim of the intervention from nursing and medical leaders. The results of the feasibility test indicate that the intervention is feasible and helpful, but the interprofessional approach was not implemented as planned. An important barrier hampering PR reduction was the high workload. The results on the prevalence of PR could not be interpreted due to a very low number of measures applied. Conclusion: The complex intervention with a multiplier approach for preventing PR use was judged as feasible, but there is a need for further development to strengthen interprofessional cooperation. The feasibility of the intervention should also be tested in other departments.

Process evaluation of a multicomponent intervention to prevent physical restraints in nursing homes (IMPRINT): A mixed methods study

AIMS

To describe the implementation process and fidelity of two versions of a guideline-based, multicomponent intervention to reduce physical restraints in nursing homes and to identify factors that might explain the heterogeneity of effects between different clusters.

DESIGN

Mixed methods evaluation of the implementation process (dose delivered, dose received, response, and adaption) alongside a pragmatic three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Quantitative and qualitative process data were collected during the study period (February 2015-February 2017). Quantitative data from questionnaires and short surveys were analysed by descriptive statistics. Qualitative data from focus groups and semi-structured interviews were analysed using content analysis. An in-depth analysis was conducted by contrasting responding and non-responding clusters regarding the intervention goal and primary outcome.

RESULTS

Both interventions were implemented as planned in all clusters: we found no deviations from the protocol regarding the dose delivered to and received by the clusters. Satisfaction of staff targeted by the interventions was high. The in-depth analysis did not reveal any pronounced variation in the degree of implementation or adoption in clusters with a good or nearly no response to the interventions or factors explaining different study effects.

CONCLUSION

Although both versions of a guideline-based multicomponent intervention to prevent physical restraints in nursing homes were implemented as planned and the response was generally acceptable, the interventions' goal to change nursing practice towards a least-restraint policy was not achieved by the entire nursing staff in all of the clusters. No factors could be identified that might explain the different effects of the interventions.

IMPACT

For some nursing homes, different approaches than addressing nurses' attitudes and institutional policies might be needed to sustainably reduce the use of physical restraints; however, the process evaluation did not reveal characteristics that might have hampered or facilitated the effectiveness of the intervention.

Oral health improvement for nursing home residents through delegated remotivation and reinstruction (MundZaRR Study): study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Oral health and oral health-related quality of life (OHrQL) of residents in German long-term residential care (LRC) are poor. We will develop an evidence-based catalogue of interventions ('Oral Health Toolbox') and provide care-accompanying reinstruction and remotivation of nursing staff by dental assistants (DA). We hypothesise that such intervention will significantly improve OHrQL, daily oral hygiene/care behaviour and is cost-effective.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A scoping review will be used to identify possible intervention components. Mixed methods will be used to identify barriers and enablers of oral hygiene and care in German LRC. The result will be the 'Oral Health Toolbox', a two-phased instrument supporting both initial intervention allocation to improve oral health/hygiene and reinstruction/remotivation. A two-arm clustered, randomised controlled trial (ratio of 1:1 via block randomisation) will be performed in LRC in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Each nursing home represents a cluster. Based on a feasibility study, considering clustering and possible attrition, we aim at recruiting 618 residents in 18 clusters. In the intervention group, dentists will assign one or more intervention component from the box (phase 1). During follow-up, nursing staff will be reinstructed and remotivated by DA, who use the box to decide how to maintain the intervention (phase 2). In the control group residents will receive care as usual. The primary outcome, OHrQL, will be measured using the General Oral Health Assessment Index. Secondary outcomes include pain condition, general health-related quality of life, caries increment, oral/prosthetic hygiene and gingival status, incidence of dental emergencies and hospitalisations, and cost-utility/effectiveness. The endpoints will be measured at baseline and after 12 months. For our primary outcome, a mixed-linear model will be used within an intention-to-treat analysis. A process evaluation using mixed methods will be conducted alongside the trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval by the University of Kiel was granted (D480/18).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04140929.

Interventions to reduce physical restraints in general hospital settings: A scoping review of components and characteristics

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of interventions for reducing physical restraints in general hospital settings.

BACKGROUND

Physical restraints, such as bedrails and belts in beds and chairs, are commonly used in general hospital settings. However, there is no clear evidence on their effectiveness but some evidence on potential risks for harm.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic database search (MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library; March 2020) and snowballing techniques. We included both interventional studies and quality improvement projects conducted in general hospital settings and published in English or German language. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection and data extraction. The Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist was used.

RESULTS

We included 31 articles (published between 1989 and 2018), 15 quality improvement projects and 16 intervention studies. Only five studies used a controlled design. Most studies and quality improvement projects investigated multicomponent interventions including education (predominantly for nursing staff) and additional components (e.g. case conferences). Three studies examined simple educational programmes without additional components.

CONCLUSIONS

A large number of multicomponent interventions for preventing and reducing physical restraints in general hospital settings have been developed. The interventions differed widely regarding the components, contents and settings. Well-designed evaluation studies investigating the effects of such interventions are lacking.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Multicomponent educational interventions might be one approach to change clinical practice, but only insufficient information is available about potential effects of these approaches.

[Database indexing of health science journals from the German-speaking area: A journal analysis]

BACKGROUND

Journal hand searching offers the possibility to complement a literature search as part of systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses. Hand searching is indicated in cases where scientific journals with potentially relevant publications addressing the research question are not indexed in a literature database. However, it is often unclear whether these journals are actually indexed, and when they are, in which literature databases. In many cases, it is also unknown which journals should be searched by hand in addition to systematic literature search after databases to be searched have been specified. Therefore, the project aimed to investigate the indexation of selected scientific health science journals and to provide an overview of indexation in order to facilitate the hand search planning process.

METHODS

Journals from German-speaking countries covering eight professional fields (medical laboratory assistance, occupational therapy, midwifery, logopedics, nursing, physiotherapy, public health and rehabilitation) were considered that publish original research papers or systematic reviews or other review types in German and/or English. Two researchers per field identified relevant journals and independently analyzed the indexing locations using the journal websites. In case of missing information, we contacted the editors.

RESULTS

A total of 70 journals were included: from 1 to 17 journals per field. These journals are indexed in 1 to 29 databases. Twelve journals are not indexed or do not offer information concerning indexation. Indexation is distributed across n=74 different literature databases. Most journals are indexed in LIVIVO (n=55) and bibnet.org (n=33). Other common indexing databases are Scopus (n=18), Web of Science Core Collection (n=16), PSYNDEX (n=13), and Embase (n=10).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate a heterogeneous indexation of the included journals. Only a small number is indexed in common international literature databases such as MEDLINE or CINAHL. On the other hand, only a few journals are not indexed in any database. The results can be used as a basis to define databases for literature searches as part of systematic reviews. In addition, the findings might guide the selection of journals for hand searching after literature databases have been defined.

Family conferences and shared prioritisation to improve patient safety in the frail elderly (COFRAIL): study protocol of a cluster randomised intervention trial in primary care

Background

Frailty in elderly patients is associated with an increased risk of poor health outcomes, including falls, delirium, malnutrition, hospitalisation, and mortality. Because polypharmacy is recognised as a possible major contributor to the pathogenesis of geriatric frailty, reducing inappropriate medication exposure is supposed to be a promising approach to improve health-related quality of life and prevent adverse outcomes. A major challenge for the process of deprescribing of inappropriate polypharmacy is to improve the communication between general practitioner (GPs), patient and family carer. This study investigates the effects of a complex intervention in frail elderly patients with polypharmacy living at home.

Methods

This is a cluster randomised controlled trial including 136 GPs and 676 patients. Patients with a positive clinical screening for frailty are eligible if they are aged 70 years or older, receiving family or professional nursing care at home, and taking in five or more drugs per day. Exclusion criteria are higher grade of dementia and life expectancy of 6 months or less. The GPs of the intervention group receive an educational training promoting a deprescribing guideline and providing information on how to conduct a family conference focussing on prioritisation of treatment goals concerning drug therapy. During the 1-year intervention, GPs are expected to perform a total of three family conferences, each including a structured medication review with patients and their family carers. GPs of the control group will receive no training and will deliver care as usual. Geriatric assessment of all patients will be performed by study nurses during home visits at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the hospitalisation rate during the observation period of 12 months. Secondary outcomes are number and appropriateness of medications, mobility, weakness, cognition, depressive disorder, health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, weight, and costs of health care use.

Discussion

This study will provide evidence for a pragmatic co-operative and patient-centred educational intervention using family conferences to improve patient safety in frail elderly patients with polypharmacy.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00015055 (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [ICTRP]). Registered on 6 February 2019.

Freiheitseinschränkung aus Sicht der Interessenvertretungen von Pflegeheimbewohnerinnen und -bewohnern − eine qualitative Studie

Zusammenfassung. Hintergrund: Freiheitseinschränkende Maßnahmen werden trotz fehlenden Belegs zum Nutzen und bekannter negativer Konsequenzen regelmäßig in Pflegeheimen eingesetzt. Neben Pflegenden können Angehörige, Betreuer / -innen, Vorsorgebevollmächtigte und Heimbeiräte als Interessenvertretungen der Bewohner / -innen den Einsatz der Maßnahmen beeinflussen. Ziel: Beschreibung der Sichtweise von Interessenvertretungen der Heimbewohner / -innen zur Anwendung und Reduktion von freiheitseinschränkenden Maßnahmen. Methodik: Für die Prozessevaluation einer pragmatischen cluster-randomisierten Studie wurden teilstrukturierte Einzel- (n = 4) und Fokusgruppeninterviews (n = 4) mit 22 Personen (vier Angehörige in der Rolle als Betreuer / -innen oder Vorsorgebevollmächtigte, eine Berufsbetreuerin, 16 Heimbeiräte) geführt und mittels qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse analysiert. Ergebnisse: Fünf Kategorien in Bezug auf freiheitseinschränkende Maßnahmen wurden gebildet: 1. Umgang im Setting Pflegeheim; 2. Bewertung der Anwendung bzw. Reduktion; 3. Information zur Anwendung bzw. Reduktion; 4. Entscheidungen zur Anwendung bzw. Reduktion; 5. Auswirkungen der Anwendung bzw. Reduktion. Interessenvertretungen sehen den Einsatz der Maßnahmen zur Sturzprophylaxe und Kontrolle von herausforderndem Verhalten als notwendig an und haben kaum Wissen zu Alternativen. Schlussfolgerungen: Angehörige, Berufsbetreuer / -innen und Heimbeiräte zeigen eher unkritische Haltungen und haben Informationsdefizite zu freiheitseinschränkenden Maßnahmen. Bei Interventionen zur Reduktion der Maßnahmen in Pflegeheimen könnte die Aufklärung dieser Gruppen unterstützend wirken.

Implementation of a multicomponent intervention to prevent physical restraints in nursing homes (IMPRINT): A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite clear evidence for the lack of effectiveness and safety, physical restraints are frequently applied in nursing homes. Multicomponent interventions addressing nurses' attitudes and organizational culture have been effective in reducing physical restraints.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of two versions of a guideline and theory-based multicomponent intervention to reduce physical restraints in nursing homes.

DESIGN

Pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted in 120 nursing homes in four regions in Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

All residents living in the participating nursing home during follow-up, newly admitted residents were also included. A total of 12,245 residents included in the primary analysis (4126 and 3547 residents in intervention group 1 and 2 and 4572 residents in the control group).

METHODS

Intervention group 1 received an updated version of a successfully tested guideline-based multicomponent intervention (comprising brief education for the nursing staff, intensive training of nominated key nurses in each cluster, introduction of a least-restraint policy and supportive material), intervention group 2 received a concise version of the original program and the control group received optimized usual care (i.e. supportive materials only). Primary outcome was physical restraint prevalence at twelve months, assessed through direct observation by blinded investigators. Intervention and control groups were compared using baseline-adjusted linear regression on cluster level, Bonferroni-adjusted for double testing. Secondary outcomes included falls, fall-related fractures, and quality of life. We also described intervention costs and performed a comprehensive process analysis.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean physical restraint prevalence was 17.4% and 19.6% in intervention groups 1 and 2, and 18.8% in the control group. After twelve months, mean prevalence was 14.6%, 15.7%, and 17.6%. Baseline-adjusted differences between mean prevalences were 2.0% (97.5% CI, -5.8 to 1.9) lower in intervention group 1 and 2.5% (97.5% CI, -6.4 to 1.4) lower in intervention group 2 compared to controls. Physical restraint prevalence showed a pronounced variation between the different clusters in all study groups. We found no significant differences in the secondary outcomes. According to the process evaluation, the intervention was mainly implemented as planned, but the expected change towards a least restraint culture of care was not achieved in all clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither intervention showed a clear advantage compared to control. The pronounced center variation in physical restraint prevalence indicates that other approaches like governmental policies are needed to sustainably change physical restraint practice and reduce center variations in nursing homes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02341898.

Freiheitsentziehende Maßnahmen in der Pflege

Freiheitsentziehende Maßnahmen, wie Bettgitter oder Gurte an Stuhl und Bett, unterscheiden sich zwar von direkten körperlichen und psychischen Gewalthandlungen in der Pflege, sind aber aus pflegefachlicher und ethischer Perspektive prinzipiell ebenso unangemessen. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick zum aktuellen Stand der Forschung zu einer leitlinienbasierten komplexen Intervention zur Vermeidung von freiheitsentziehenden Maßnahmen in deutschen Pflegeheimen.

Abstract OT3-03-03: PARTNER: Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients

Background: No specific targeted therapies are available for Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC), an aggressive and diverse subgroup. The basal TNBC sub-group share some phenotypic and molecular similarities with germline BRCA (gBRCA) tumours. In gBRCA patients, and potentially other homologous recombination deficiencies, these already compromised pathways may allow drugs called PARP inhibitors (Olaparib) to work more effectively. Aims: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for basal TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR)).

Methods: Trial design: 3-stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin +/- olaparib, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen. Stage 1 and 2: Randomisation (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or one of two research arms with the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD for 12 days. Stage 3: Patients are randomised (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2. End-points: Stage 1: Safety; Stage 2: Schedule selection using pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib using a “pick-the-winner” design. Stage 3: pCR rate. Enrichment design is applied with an overall significance level 0.05(α) and 80% power. A total of 527 patients will be included to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to platinum based chemotherapy.

Trial Progress: PARTNER has been recruiting in UK since 27th May 2016. IDSMC recommended to continue the trial without change after reviewing the Stage 1 safety data. The recruitment of stage 2 was completed in April 2018 and results to be reviewed by the IDSMC in early 2019. The trial is open and enrolling patients to national and international sites.

Citation Format: Abraham J, Vallier A-L, Qian W, Machin A, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Weiss M, Harvey C, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roberts A, Roylance R, Copson E, Pinilla K, Armstrong A, Provenzano E, Tischkowitz M, McMurty E, Earl H. PARTNER: Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-03-03.

Abstract PD3-04: Analysis of ERBB2 (HER2) amplification by ctDNA in a phase Ib dose-escalation trial evaluating trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with neratinib in women with metastatic disease with initially diagnosed HER2+ breast cancer: NSABP FB-10

Background:

In this phase Ib study, the activity of T-DM1 plus N was assessed in patients (pt) previously treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and a taxane (H+P+T). Several mechanisms of resistance have been hypothesized in pts progressing following H+P+T, including acquired alterations in the ERBB (HER) family proteins, reactivation of bypass or parallel pathways, or selective elimination of HER2-overexpressing clones. Loss of HER2 amp has been shown to occur in 25-35% of pts with residual tumor after neoadjuvant therapy or in metastatic disease after initial therapy with chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents. Data on concordance of HER2 status between tissue and blood is limited. In 7 pts with cfDNA HER2 amp, concomitant tissue was concordant in all 7 pairs and response to anti-HER2 therapy occurred in 6. In our study we have retrospectively analyzed cfDNA in blood samples obtained at study entry.

Methods:

Eligible pts had prior H+P+T as neoadjuvant therapy, or 1st-line metastatic disease, measurable disease, ECOG PS ≤2, and adequate hematologic, renal, and liver function. Pts with stable brain metastases were eligible. Treatment consisted of T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg iv q3wk and N 120, 160, 200, or 240 mg/d using a 3+3 dose-escalation design. HER2+ was determined at initial diagnosis; tissue confirmation at study entry (after H+P+T progression) was not required. Blood was collected in for pharmacokinetic analyses of N peak and trough, and for cfDNA using the Guardant360 assay, which is a 73-gene next-generation cfDNA-sequencing panel that detects SNVs, indels, CNAs, and fusions, utilizing Digital Sequencing and custom bioinformatics methods for error correction. The cut-off for HER2 amp was a copy number of ≥2.0 established by Guardant based on training-set data.

Results:

There were 27 H+P+T-resistant pts enrolled and all pts had a blood sample analyzed for HER2 amp. Eighteen pts were evaluable for efficacy at 6 wks and 11 pts at 12 wks. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 6 pts during cycle 1, 1 pt was withdrawn for non-compliance, and 2 pts were withdrawn for disease complications. The recommended phase II dose of N was determined to be 160 mg/d. Responses were seen at all dose-levels of N. Pharmacokinetic analyses did not show a clear relationship with either peak or trough and dose-level. Ten pts showed HER2 amp in blood and 17 were non-amp. Of 18 pts evaluable after 2 cycles (6 wks), 12 pts had an objective response (7 amp; 5 non-amp) and 5 had progressive disease (1 amp; 4 non-amp). At 12 wks, there were 3 CRs and 8 PRs (7 amp; 4 non-amp). All CRs were in amp pts and lasted 364, 510, and 859+ days.

Conclusions:

HER2 amp as determined by cfDNA was found in 10 of 27 pts. The deeper and more prolonged (&gt;12 wk) responses occurred in 7 of 10 amp HER2 pts v 4 of 17 non-amp HER2 pts (p=0.04). In our ongoing phase II study of this regimen concomitant tissue and blood will be analyzed to better understand potential benefit or lack of benefit, with continued use of anti-HER2 therapy after progression on anti-HER2 therapies.

Support: Puma Biotechnology, Inc.

Citation Format: Abraham J, Puhalla SL, Sikov WM, Montero AJ, Salkeni MA, Razaq WA, Beumer JH, Kiesel BF, Buyse ME, Adamson LM, Srinivasan A, Pogue-Geile KL, Allegra CJ, Nagy RJ, Jacobs SA. Analysis of ERBB2 (HER2) amplification by ctDNA in a phase Ib dose-escalation trial evaluating trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with neratinib in women with metastatic disease with initially diagnosed HER2+ breast cancer: NSABP FB-10 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-04.

Abstract P1-06-09: Correlation of breast cancer index (BCI) results to lymphovascular invasion in early stage HR+ breast cancer

Background: Positive lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a negative prognostic factor for women with early-stage ER+ breast cancer. LVI, along with other clinicopathologic factors such as larger tumor size, higher grade and positive nodal status, increase a patient's risk of late (post-5y) recurrence. Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a validated gene expression-based assay for patients with early-stage HR+ breast cancer that reports an individualized risk of late distant recurrence based on a combination of the HOXB13/I17BR ratio and the molecular grade index (MGI). The correlation of LVI and individualized risk stratification by genomic analysis is not well characterized. Therefore, this study evaluated risk stratification by BCI based on the presence or absence of LVI.

Methods: A population of 2,613 patients with known LVI status were identified in the Breast Cancer Index Clinical Database for Correlative Studies, an IRB-approved de-identified database which contains clinicopathologic and molecular variables of more than 19,000 clinical cases submitted for BCI testing. LVI was recorded as either positive or negative based on pathology report review. BCI results based on LVI status from LN- (n=2035) and LN+ patients (n=578) were evaluated separately. Chi-squared tests were used to compare BCI results between LVI groups.

Results: In analyses of 2,613 patients with LVI data available (median age 59.1 y; range 28-89y; 74% ≥50y), 18.3% of patients showed evidence of LVI (LVI-pos). In comparison to the LVI-neg tumors submitted for BCI testing, the LVI-pos tumors had a higher proportion of grade 3 tumors (33% vs 16%, p&lt;0.0001), more LVI-pos tumors were 2.0 cm or greater (45% vs 23%, p&lt;0.0001), a higher percentage LVI-pos patients had node-positive disease (51% vs 16%, p&lt;0.0001), and a higher proportion of LVI-pos tumors showed high Ki67 (Ki67 ≥14%; 64% vs 51%, p=0.004). A correlation between LVI positivity and high BCI prognostic risk was observed, with a higher proportion of LVI-pos patients classified as high risk of late distant recurrence in both the LN- (68% vs 49%, p&lt;0.0001) and LN+ subsets (84% vs 70%, p&lt;0.0001) compared to LVI-neg patients. LVI-pos patients had a higher median molecular proliferative status (MGI) compared to LVI-neg patients regardless of nodal status (p&lt;0.0001 for both). In contrast to the categorical LVI prognostic factor, the wide distribution of BCI individual risk scores provides additional resolution that identifies a substantial subset of LVI positive tumors (32%) that that have a low risk of late recurrence by genomic analysis.

Conclusion: While BCI Prognostic stratification correlated with LVI status, BCI identified a subset of patients with LVI positivity as having a low risk of late distant recurrence that otherwise would have an unfavorable prognosis based on LVI and/or LN positivity. These findings help to characterize differential patient stratification based on an individualized assessment of tumor biology versus LVI for patients considering EET.

Citation Format: Vulchi M, Sagalnik M, Schnabel CA, Abraham J. Correlation of breast cancer index (BCI) results to lymphovascular invasion in early stage HR+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-09.

Abstract P5-21-26: T-DM1 activity in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients who have received prior trastuzumab and pertuzumab: NSABP B-005

Background :

The pivotal phase III EMILIA trial reported a progression free survival (PFS) rate of 9.6 months and an objective response rate of 43% with T-DM1 in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. However, there is very limited data on the efficacy of T-DM1 in patients who have received prior pertuzumab either neoadjuvantly or as first line therapy in the metastatic setting. The primary goal of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy (tumor response rates and median duration on therapy) of T-DM1 in patients previously treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab.

Methods:

After IRB approval, a cancer data registry and electronic pharmacy database were utilized to identify breast cancer patients receiving treatment with T-DM1 at Cleveland Clinic and University of Pittsburgh. Patients that received trastuzumab and pertuzumab, in either the neoadjuvant or metastatic setting, with baseline and follow up imaging available for review were identified. Patient charts were reviewed to collect accurate information about the treatment sequencing and outcomes. RECIST version 1.1 was utilized for tumor assessment and patients with measurable disease and non measurable disease were included in the study.

Results:

We identified a total of 23 patients with a median age of 55 years that met the inclusion criteria. 69% percent of patients received T-DM1 as first line or second line therapy and 31% received it as third line or later. All patients had at least 1 measurable lesion. Best overall response showed rates of complete response, partial response and stable disease of 17%, 26% and 22% respectively. 35% patients progressed on first assessment after start of treatment. The median duration on therapy was 5.3 months (range 3 weeks to 33 months) with 43% of patients receiving T-DM1 for greater than 6 months.

Conclusion:

Our results were comparable to those reported by EMILIA trial. T-DM1 has reasonable clinical efficacy in patients who have received prior treatment with pertuzumab and trastuzumab with an overall response rate of 43% and median duration on therapy of 5.3 months.

Citation Format: Tiwari SR, Sussman T, Kota K, Moore HC, Montero AJ, Budd GT, Puhalha S, Abraham J. T-DM1 activity in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients who have received prior trastuzumab and pertuzumab: NSABP B-005 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-26.

Abstract OT3-04-03: PARTNER randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients

Background: No specific targeted therapies are available for Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC), an aggressive and diverse subgroup. The basal TNBC subgroup show some phenotypic and molecular similarities with germline BRCA (gBRCA). In gBRCA patients, and potentially other homologous recombination deficiencies, these already compromised pathways may allow drugs called PARP inhibitors (olaparib) to work more effectively.

Aims: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for basal TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR)).

Trial design: 3 stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin +/olaparib, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen.

Stage 1 and 2: Patients are randomised (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or one of two research arms with the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD for 12 days.

Stage 3: Patients are randomised (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2.

Methods:

Stage 1 Safety: both research arms combined.

Stage 2 Schedule selection criteria: pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib protocol treatment. It is a “pickthewinner” design with 53 patients in each research arm. This allows a 90% power, 5% onesided significance level to test null hypothesis of pCR ≤35% versus an alternative hypothesis of pCR ≥55% in each of the research arms.

Stage 3 Efficacy:anticipated pCR ˜55-60% for all trial patients and ˜60-65% for gBRCA patients. The trial is powered to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to chemotherapy (enriched design). TNBC patient recruitment will be capped, to ensure required gBRCA patients are enrolled. Enrichment design is applied with overall significance level 0.05(α) = 0.025(αall)+ 0.025(αgBRCA) and 80% power.

Target accrual: 527 [gBRCA 220] Current accrual: 56 Sites activated: 15 [expected number of sites 30-50].

Citation Format: Abraham J, Vallier A-L, Qian W, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Machin A, Harvey C, Chiu E, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roylance R, Copson E, Armstrong A, Provenzano E, Tischkowitz M, McMurtry E, Earl H. PARTNER randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-04-03.

Individualized Survival and Treatment Response Predictions for Breast Cancers Using Phospho-EGFR, Phospho-ER, Phospho-HER2/neu, Phospho-IGF-IR/In, Phospho-MAPK, and Phospho-p70S6K Proteins

The development and progression of breast cancer involves the activation of numerous protein kinases, and the change in phosphorylation is a hallmark of protein kinase activation. In this study, we identified a comprehensive profile to predict individual breast cancer patients’ survival and treatment responses using the Random Committee algorithm. The profile incorporated a subset of phosphorylated signal protein expressions and several selected clinical factors of breast cancer. The parameters of our profile were identified by supervised feature selection algorithms, Gain Ratio Attribute Evaluation and Relief. The results showed that the overall accuracy of survival prediction reached 92.3% for individual breast cancer patients with the use of the expression profiles of phospho-EGFR, phospho-ER, phospho-HER2/neu, phospho-IGF-IR/In, phospho-MAPK, and phospho-p70S6K plus the selected clinical factors. The results also indicated that the overall accuracy of treatment response prediction was 92.6% with the use of the level of phospho-EGFR, phospho-ER, phospho-HER2/neu, phospho-MAPK, and phospho-p70S6K plus the selected clinical information. The prediction system combines multiple signal protein activation profiles and relevant clinical information, and provides a unique guideline to aid individualized decision-making in the clinical management of breast cancer.

Neurotensin receptor type 2 protects B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells from apoptosis

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) cells are resistant to apoptosis, and consequently accumulate to the detriment of normal B cells and patient immunity. Because current therapies fail to eradicate these apoptosis-resistant cells, it is essential to identify alternative survival pathways as novel targets for anticancer therapies. Overexpression of cell-surface G protein-coupled receptors drives cell transformation, and thus plays a critical role in malignancies. In this study, we identified neurotensin receptor 2 (NTSR2) as an essential driver of apoptosis resistance in B-CLL. NTSR2 was highly expressed in B-CLL cells, whereas expression of its natural ligand, neurotensin (NTS), was minimal in both B-CLL cells and patient plasma. Surprisingly, NTSR2 remained in a constitutively active phosphorylated state, caused not by a mutation-induced gain-of-function but rather by an interaction with the oncogenic tyrosine kinase receptor TrkB. Functional and biochemical characterization revealed that the NTSR2-TrkB interaction acts as a conditional oncogenic driver requiring the TrkB ligand brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which unlike NTS is highly expressed in B-CLL cells. Together, NTSR2, TrkB and BDNF induce autocrine and/or paracrine survival pathways that are independent of mutation status and indolent or progressive disease course. The NTSR2-TrkB interaction activates survival signaling pathways, including the Src and AKT kinase pathways, as well as expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. When NTSR2 was downregulated, TrkB failed to protect B-CLL cells from a drastic decrease in viability via typical apoptotic cell death, reflected by DNA fragmentation and Annexin V presentation. Together, our findings demonstrate that the NTSR2-TrkB interaction plays a crucial role in B-CLL cell survival, suggesting that inhibition of NTSR2 represents a promising targeted strategy for treating B-CLL malignancy.

Lymphocyte density determined by computational pathology validated as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: secondary analysis of the ARTemis trial

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown lymphocyte density, measured using computational pathology, is associated with pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer. The clinical validity of this finding in independent studies, among patients receiving different chemotherapy, is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The ARTemis trial randomly assigned 800 women with early stage breast cancer between May 2009 and January 2013 to three cycles of docetaxel, followed by three cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide once every 21 days with or without four cycles of bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was pCR (absence of invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes). We quantified lymphocyte density within haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole slide images using our previously described computational pathology approach: for every detected lymphocyte the average distance to the nearest 50 lymphocytes was calculated and the density derived from this statistic. We analyzed both pre-treatment biopsies and post-treatment surgical samples of the tumour bed.

RESULTS

Of the 781 patients originally included in the primary endpoint analysis of the trial, 609 (78%) were included for baseline lymphocyte density analyses and a subset of 383 (49% of 781) for analyses of change in lymphocyte density. The main reason for loss of patients was the availability of digitized whole slide images. Pre-treatment lymphocyte density modelled as a continuous variable was associated with pCR on univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], 2.92; 95% CI, 1.78-4.85; P < 0.001) and after adjustment for clinical covariates (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.24-3.67; P = 0.006). Increased pre- to post-treatment lymphocyte density showed an independent inverse association with pCR (adjusted OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.033-0.31; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphocyte density in pre-treatment biopsies was validated as an independent predictor of pCR in breast cancer. Computational pathology is emerging as a viable and objective means of identifying predictive biomarkers for cancer patients.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV

NCT01093235.

Abstract P6-09-22: Detecting high mutational load ER+ breast cancer patients through Foundation One cancer gene panel mutations

Background:

Cancer gene panels such as Foundation One are widely used clinically for aiding with cancer treatment decision-making since single point mutations in important genes and gene pathways in the tumor can point to tumor susceptibility that can be targeted with specific drugs. Tumor mutational load has more recently been proposed as a useful prognostic factor and indicator of clinical benefit in treatment with PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade therapy. Breast cancer estrogen receptor positive patients (ER+) in particular appear to have a subset of high mutational load patients that could benefit if identified. However whole exome sequencing needed to directly measure mutational load is not yet widely available as a clinical tool. In this study we evaluate the predictive value of Foundation One cancer gene panel mutations for estimating tumor genome-wide mutational load and its use in identifying a clinically meaningful subset of breast cancer patients.

Methods:

The Cancer Genome Atlas breast cancer sequencing data on 569 ER+ patients was used to establish mutational load distribution. ER+ patients were divided into low mutational load and high mutational load groups according to 3 criteria: mean mutational load, the point of inflection in the mutational load distribution and the mutational load that optimally separates groups in terms of survival. Foundation One (FO) mutational load was then calculated as the number of mutations present within the 314 genes queried by the panel. FO mutational load was used to predict whether patients fell into the low or high mutational load groups found through analysis of the full exome data. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and optimal values for specificity and sensitivity of the FO mutational load classification were found.

Results:

Mean mutational load for ER+ patients was found to be 57 mutations, the point of inflection of the mutational load distribution was established at 100 mutations, and the number of mutations that best separated groups in terms of survival was 160, (HR = 6.6, p-value=0.004). FO mutational load was found to be a good predictor for the low and high classifications established by all three criteria, with areas under the curve of 0.74, 0.91 and 0.945 respectively. The optimal predictive value of the FO mutational load classification was found at 5 mutations as the cut-off, with 94.2% specificity and 88% sensitivity for predicting groups defined by survival and 95% specificity and 71% sensitivity for those defined by the mean.

Conclusion:

The Foundation One cancer gene panel can be used to effectively identify a clinically meaningful subgroup of ER+ patients with high mutational load. These patients may benefit from targeted treatments such as PD-1 inhibitors being offered through clinical trials. The compromise in sensitivity that results from the reduction in number of genes queried by a panel means an important proportion of patients with high mutational load will be missed but this still translates to a large improvement in the identification of these patients given the wide availability of gene panels in the clinic. Basic and clinical follow-up studies need to take place to clinically validate the high mutational load ER+ patient subgroup.

Citation Format: Raska P, Abraham J, Budd T. Detecting high mutational load ER+ breast cancer patients through Foundation One cancer gene panel mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-22.

Abstract P2-12-04: Impact of institution of young women's breast cancer clinic on time to treatment and utilization of fertility, genetics and social work consultations in women under age 50 with new diagnosis of early stage breast cancer

Background: Genetic counseling and fertility resources are often underutilized in young women with early stage breast cancer (ESBC) due, in part, to concerns about treatment delays. At our institution, women newly diagnosed with ESBC typically see a breast surgeon, medical oncologist and radiation oncologist in a multidisciplinary clinic with additional cancer related subspecialist referrals occurring at those providers' discretion. We hypothesized that time to treatment (TTT) and utilization of fertility, genetics and social work consultations would improve after implementing a Young Women's Breast Cancer Clinic. As of January 1, 2015, all patients under age 50 seen at Cleveland Clinic for new diagnosis of ESBC were automatically offered scheduling of appointments with medical genetics, reproductive endocrinology and social work in addition to the usual multidisciplinary team.

Methods: Women under age 50 diagnosed with ESBC seen at Cleveland Clinic from 1/2014-12/2015 were identified using our tumor registry. Demographics, tumor pathology, clinical and treatment histories were obtained through medical chart review as per IRB approved protocol. Time from initial visit in our system to date of treatment initiation was calculated for all patients and compared between the 2014 (pre-intervention) and 2015 (post-intervention) cohorts as was time from diagnosis (biopsy date) to treatment initiation. Completed reproductive endocrinology, genetic counseling and social work consultations were documented. Welch two sample t-test was used to compare time to treatment between groups. Chi squared test was used to compare frequency of subspecialty consultations between groups.

Results: 207 young women with ESBC were identified over the 2 year period, 99 in 2014 and 108 in 2015. Median age was 45 in 2014 and 44 in 2015. Most were diagnosed outside of our hospital system, 58% in 2014 and 76% in 2015. The most common initial treatment was surgery with reconstruction (S+R) (54% and 50% for 2014 and 2015 respectively) followed by chemotherapy (23% and 27%) then surgery without reconstruction (S) (20% and 24%). Median TTT from first encounter was 30 days in 2014 and 28 days in 2015 (p=0.33) and was 36 days versus 33.5 days (p=0.23) when calculated from biopsy date. TTT in the S and S+R groups was 37 vs 28 days (p=0.84) and 36.5 vs 32 days, (p=0.21), respectively. Genetics, reproductive endocrinology and social work consults in 2014 vs 2015 were documented as 89% vs 94%, 4% vs 9% and 58 vs% 55% (p=0.22, 0.32, 0.77). For patients under age 40, 27% in 2014 and 30% in 2015 completed reproductive endocrinology consultations.

Conclusions: Offering upfront scheduling of breast cancer related subspecialty appointments for young women with newly diagnosed ESBC did not significantly improve overall TTT. There was a trend towards improved TTT in those receiving surgery with or without reconstruction as first treatment and no suggestion of delay in TTT. A modest numeric increase in completed genetic counseling and reproductive endocrinology consultations was not statistically significant, but may have been clinically meaningful for affected individuals.

Citation Format: Kruse ML, Raska P, Abraham J, Budd GT, Montero A, Grobmyer S, Moore H. Impact of institution of young women's breast cancer clinic on time to treatment and utilization of fertility, genetics and social work consultations in women under age 50 with new diagnosis of early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-04.