1
|
Streck JM, Rigotti NA, Livingstone-Banks J, Tindle HA, Clair C, Munafò MR, Sterling-Maisel C, Hartmann-Boyce J. Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 5:CD001837. [PMID: 38770804 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001837.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2020, 32.6% of the world's population used tobacco. Smoking contributes to many illnesses that require hospitalisation. A hospital admission may prompt a quit attempt. Initiating smoking cessation treatment, such as pharmacotherapy and/or counselling, in hospitals may be an effective preventive health strategy. Pharmacotherapies work to reduce withdrawal/craving and counselling provides behavioural skills for quitting smoking. This review updates the evidence on interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients, to understand the most effective smoking cessation treatment methods for hospitalised smokers. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of any type of smoking cessation programme for patients admitted to an acute care hospital. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 7 September 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised studies of behavioural, pharmacological or multicomponent interventions to help patients admitted to hospital quit. Interventions had to start in the hospital (including at discharge), and people had to have smoked within the last month. We excluded studies in psychiatric, substance and rehabilitation centres, as well as studies that did not measure abstinence at six months or longer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was abstinence from smoking assessed at least six months after discharge or the start of the intervention. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence, preferring biochemically-validated rates where reported. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 82 studies (74 RCTs) that included 42,273 participants in the review (71 studies, 37,237 participants included in the meta-analyses); 36 studies are new to this update. We rated 10 studies as being at low risk of bias overall (low risk in all domains assessed), 48 at high risk of bias overall (high risk in at least one domain), and the remaining 24 at unclear risk. Cessation counselling versus no counselling, grouped by intensity of intervention Hospitalised patients who received smoking cessation counselling that began in the hospital and continued for more than a month after discharge had higher quit rates than patients who received no counselling in the hospital or following hospitalisation (risk ratio (RR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24 to 1.49; 28 studies, 8234 participants; high-certainty evidence). In absolute terms, this might account for an additional 76 quitters in every 1000 participants (95% CI 51 to 103). The evidence was uncertain (very low-certainty) about the effects of counselling interventions of less intensity or shorter duration (in-hospital only counselling ≤ 15 minutes: RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.89; 2 studies, 1417 participants; and in-hospital contact plus follow-up counselling support for ≤ 1 month: RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.20; 7 studies, 4627 participants) versus no counselling. There was moderate-certainty evidence, limited by imprecision, that smoking cessation counselling for at least 15 minutes in the hospital without post-discharge support led to higher quit rates than no counselling in the hospital (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.58; 12 studies, 4432 participants). Pharmacotherapy versus placebo or no pharmacotherapy Nicotine replacement therapy helped more patients to quit than placebo or no pharmacotherapy (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.67; 8 studies, 3838 participants; high-certainty evidence). In absolute terms, this might equate to an additional 62 quitters per 1000 participants (95% CI 9 to 126). There was moderate-certainty evidence, limited by imprecision (as CI encompassed the possibility of no difference), that varenicline helped more hospitalised patients to quit than placebo or no pharmacotherapy (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.75; 4 studies, 829 participants). Evidence for bupropion was low-certainty; the point estimate indicated a modest benefit at best, but CIs were wide and incorporated clinically significant harm and clinically significant benefit (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.43, 4 studies, 872 participants). Hospital-only intervention versus intervention that continues after hospital discharge Patients offered both smoking cessation counselling and pharmacotherapy after discharge had higher quit rates than patients offered counselling in hospital but not offered post-discharge support (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.38; 7 studies, 5610 participants; high-certainty evidence). In absolute terms, this might equate to an additional 34 quitters per 1000 participants (95% CI 13 to 55). Post-discharge interventions offering real-time counselling without pharmacotherapy (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.60, 8 studies, 2299 participants; low certainty-evidence) and those offering unscheduled counselling without pharmacotherapy (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.14; 2 studies, 1598 participants; very low-certainty evidence) may have little to no effect on quit rates compared to control. Telephone quitlines versus control To provide post-discharge support, hospitals may refer patients to community-based telephone quitlines. Both comparisons relating to these interventions had wide CIs encompassing both possible harm and possible benefit, and were judged to be of very low certainty due to imprecision, inconsistency, and risk of bias (post-discharge telephone counselling versus quitline referral: RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.51; 3 studies, 3260 participants; quitline referral versus control: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.96; 2 studies, 1870 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Offering hospitalised patients smoking cessation counselling beginning in hospital and continuing for over one month after discharge increases quit rates, compared to no hospital intervention. Counselling provided only in hospital, without post-discharge support, may have a modest impact on quit rates, but evidence is less certain. When all patients receive counselling in the hospital, high-certainty evidence indicates that providing both counselling and pharmacotherapy after discharge increases quit rates compared to no post-discharge intervention. Starting nicotine replacement or varenicline in hospitalised patients helps more patients to quit smoking than a placebo or no medication, though evidence for varenicline is only moderate-certainty due to imprecision. There is less evidence of benefit for bupropion in this setting. Some of our evidence was limited by imprecision (bupropion versus placebo and varenicline versus placebo), risk of bias, and inconsistency related to heterogeneity. Future research is needed to identify effective strategies to implement, disseminate, and sustain interventions, and to ensure cessation counselling and pharmacotherapy initiated in the hospital is sustained after discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (MA), USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Hilary A Tindle
- Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Carole Clair
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marcus R Munafò
- School of Experimental Psychology and MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harfmann RF, Heil SH, Bunn JY, Snell LM, Tidey JW, Sigmon SC, Gaalema DE, Lee DC, Streck JM, Bergeria CL, Davis DR, Plucinski S, Higgins ST. Changes in weight among individuals with psychiatric conditions or socioeconomic disadvantage assigned to smoke very low nicotine content cigarettes. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2024; 32:181-188. [PMID: 38236223 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Nicotine abstinence leads to weight gain, which could be an unintended consequence of a nicotine reduction policy. This secondary analysis used weekly assessments of weight and ratings of "increased appetite/hunger/weight gain" collected in three 12-week, randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of cigarettes differing in nicotine dose (15.8, 2.4, or 0.4 mg/g) among individuals with affective disorders, opioid use disorder (OUD), and socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Linear mixed models tested differences by dose and time. Analyses first collapsed across populations and then separated out individuals with OUD because biomarkers suggested they used substantially more noncombusted nicotine. Across populations, weight increased significantly over time, averaging 1.03 kg (p < .001), but did not vary by dose nor was there any interaction of dose/time. "Increased appetite/hunger/weight gain" ratings increased significantly as a function of dose, with differences between low and high doses (1.95 and 1.73, respectively, p = .01), but not by time nor any interaction. In the combined group of individuals with affective disorders and socioeconomically disadvantaged women, weight and "increased appetite/hunger/weight gain" ratings increased significantly by dose, with differences between low and high doses (1.43 vs. 0.73 kg, p = .003 and 2.00 vs. 1.76, p = .02, respectively). Among individuals with OUD, there were no significant effects of any kind on either outcome. Individuals with affective disorders and socioeconomically disadvantaged women gained weight and reported more subjective appetite/weight gain when given 0.4, but not 2.4 mg/g cigarettes, despite comparable decreases in nicotine exposure. However, neither change was clinically significant, suggesting minimal short-term adverse consequences of a nicotine reduction policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne F Harfmann
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
| | - Janice Y Bunn
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
| | - L Morgan Snell
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University
| | | | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
| | - Dustin C Lee
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University
| | | | - Cecilia L Bergeria
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University
| | | | - Shirley Plucinski
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cooke ME, Knoll SJ, Streck JM, Potter K, Lamberth E, Rychik N, Gilman JM, Evins AE, Schuster RM. Contingency management is associated with positive changes in attitudes and reductions in cannabis use even after discontinuation of incentives among non-treatment seeking youth. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 256:111096. [PMID: 38277735 PMCID: PMC10923125 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important to identify interventions that reduce harm in youth not motivated to change their cannabis use. This study evaluated how short-duration contingency management (CM) impacts cannabis use attitudes and behavior after abstinence incentives are discontinued among non-treatment seeking youth. METHODS Participants (N=220) were randomized to 4 weeks of abstinence-based CM (CB-Abst; n=126) or monitoring (CB-Mon; n=94). Participants completed self-report and provided biochemical measures of cannabis exposure at baseline, end-of-intervention, and 4-week follow-up. Changes in self-reported cannabis use frequency (days/week; times/week) and biochemically verified creatinine-adjusted 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations (CN-THCCOOH) were analyzed between groups from baseline to follow-up. In CB-Abst, cannabis use goals at end-of-intervention were described and changes in cannabis use at follow-up were explored by goals and cannabis use disorder (CUD) diagnosis. RESULTS There was a group by visit interaction on cannabis use (days: beta=0.93, p=0.005; times: beta=0.71, p<0.001; CN-THCCOOH: beta=0.26, p=0.004), with reductions at follow-up detected only in CB-Abst. Following 4 weeks of abstinence, 68.4% of CB-Abst participants wanted to reduce or abstain from cannabis use following completion of CM. Those in CB-Abst who set end-of-intervention reduction goals and were without CUD had greater decreases in cannabis use frequency at follow-up (Goals*time on days/week: beta=-2.27, p<0.001; CUD*time on times/week: beta=0.48, SE=0.24, t=2.01, p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS Findings support the utility of brief incentivized abstinence for generating motivation to reduce cannabis use and behavior change even after incentives end. This study supports CM as a potentially viable harm reduction strategy for those not yet ready to quit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Cooke
- Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Sarah J Knoll
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin Potter
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin Lamberth
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Natali Rychik
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Jodi M Gilman
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Eden Evins
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Randi M Schuster
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Walter AW, Lee JW, Streck JM, Gareen IF, Herman BA, Kircher SM, Carlos RC, Kumar SK, Mayer IA, Saba NF, Fenske TS, Neal JW, Atkins MB, Hodi FS, Kyriakopoulos CE, Tempany-Afdhal CM, Shanafelt TD, Wagner LI, Land SR, Ostroff JS, Park ER. The effect of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage on smoking status, quit attempts, and receipt of cessation support among adults with cancer: Results from nine ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group trials. Cancer 2024; 130:439-452. [PMID: 37795845 PMCID: PMC10841845 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco use is associated with adverse outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer. Socioeconomic determinants influence access and utilization of tobacco treatment; little is known about the relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (NSD) and tobacco assessment, assistance, and cessation among patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS A modified Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire (C-TUQ) was administered to patients enrolled in nine ECOG-ACRIN clinical trials. We examined associations of NSD with (1) smoking status, (2) receiving tobacco cessation assessment and support, and (3) cessation behaviors. NSD was classified by tertiles of the Area Deprivation Index. Associations between NSD and tobacco variables were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 740 patients completing the C-TUQ were 70% male, 94% White, 3% Hispanic, mean age 58.8 years. Cancer diagnoses included leukemia 263 (36%), lymphoma 141 (19%), prostate 131 (18%), breast 79 (11%), melanoma 69 (9%), myeloma 53 (7%), and head and neck 4 (0.5%). A total of 402 (54%) never smoked, 257 (35%) had formerly smoked, and 81 (11%) were currently smoking. Patients in high disadvantaged neighborhoods were approximately four times more likely to report current smoking (odds ratio [OR], 3.57; 95% CI, 1.69-7.54; p = .0009), and more likely to report being asked about smoking (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.64-10.98; p = .0029), but less likely to report receiving counseling (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.58; p = .0086) versus those in the least disadvantaged neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS Greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with smoking but less cessation support. Increased cessation support in cancer care is needed, particularly for patients from disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Wangari Walter
- Department of Public Health, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Benjamin A. Herman
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | - Ruth C. Carlos
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Ingrid A. Mayer
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
| | - Nabil F. Saba
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Joel W. Neal
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Michael B. Atkins
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Frank S. Hodi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Tait D. Shanafelt
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Jamie S. Ostroff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Elyse R. Park
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Streck JM, Potter K, Pachas G, Cather C, Nielsen L, Eden Evins A. Alternative combusted tobacco product and multiple tobacco product use among individuals with serious mental illness enrolled in a large pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Addict Behav 2024; 148:107844. [PMID: 37678006 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Use of combustible alternative tobacco products (ATPs; e.g., little cigars, loose tobacco, multiple tobacco product types [TPTs]) is increasingly common. Inexpensive, combusted ATPs (e.g little cigars) are predominantly marketed to lower-income communities. Prevalence of combusted ATP use among those with serious mental illness (SMI) is unknown. METHODS We examined rates and correlates of combusted ATP use and association with tobacco abstinence in a secondary analysis of a single-cohort (N = 1007) trial of tobacco-smoking adults with SMI and severe SMI-related functional impairment. The parent study aimed to test a community-health worker-delivered intervention for promoting smoking cessation among adults with SMI. Participants were surveyed at baseline on demographic and smoking characteristics including combusted TPT (cigarettes, cigars/little cigars, loose tobacco), and breath carbon-monoxide (CO). CO-verified 7-day point-prevalence tobacco abstinence was assessed at Year 2. RESULTS At baseline, 59% of participants reported using cigarettes only, 25% multiple (>1) combusted TPTs, 12% cigars/little cigars only, and 4% loose tobacco (e.g., "rollies", pipes) only. Those reporting any ATP use at baseline had higher expired CO concentration and reported using more tobacco products per day than exclusive cigarette users (p's < 0.05). ATP use was not associated with abstinence in adjusted logistic regression models (p's > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Use of ATPs was associated with use of more tobacco products per day and greater tobacco toxicant exposure than exclusive cigarette use in this population. Future policy efforts work to change preferential taxation policies (e.g., lower taxation for cigar products) and disproportionate marketing of ATPs to lower-income communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA; Tobacco Research & Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Kevin Potter
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gladys Pachas
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Corinne Cather
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lindsay Nielsen
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Eden Evins
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parker MA, Cruz-Cano R, Streck JM, Ballis E, Weinberger AH. Incidence of opioid misuse by cigarette smoking status in the United States. Addict Behav 2023; 147:107837. [PMID: 37659270 PMCID: PMC10529804 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of opioid misuse and cigarette smoking contributes to increased morbidity and mortality compared to each substance use alone. We estimated the incidence of opioid misuse for persons who currently or formerly smoked versus never smoked. METHODS Data came from the 2015-2020 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health cross-sectional surveys of US civilians aged 12+ (n = 315,661). Weighted opioid misuse incidence and average time between cigarette use initiation and opioid misuse initiation were calculated annually by smoking status. Logistic regression models tested time trends in incidence by smoking status. RESULTS Overall, 0.75% of persons initiated opioid misuse per year; opioid misuse incidence was 1.35% for those who currently smoked cigarettes, 0.54% for those who formerly smoked, and 0.67% for those who never smoked. For persons who currently smoked and misused opioids (1.50%), 95.08% smoked prior to opioid use. The average time between smoking followed by opioid misuse was 12.93 years and for opioid misuse followed by smoking was 4.36 years. Persons who currently smoked were more likely to initiate opioid misuse than those who had never smoked (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.60, 2.06). There was a decrease in the opioid misuse incidence over time (AOR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.92), which did not differ by smoking status. CONCLUSIONS Persons who currently smoked cigarettes, relative to those who never smoked, were more likely to initiate opioid misuse. As most individuals smoked before opioid misuse, it may be useful for primary prevention efforts to decrease opioid misuse initiation by focusing on smoking status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Parker
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - Raul Cruz-Cano
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eleni Ballis
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Andrea H Weinberger
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA; Departments of Epidemiology & Population Health and Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Streck JM, Lee JW, Walter AW, Rosen RL, Gareen IF, Kircher SM, Herman BA, Carlos RC, Kumar S, Mayer IA, Saba NF, Fenske TS, Neal JW, Atkins MB, Hodi FS, Kyriakopoulos CE, Tempany C, Shanafelt TD, Wagner LI, Land SR, Park ER, Ostroff JS. Cigarette and Alternative Tobacco Product Use among Adult Cancer Survivors Enrolled in 9 ECOG-ACRIN Clinical Trials. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1552-1557. [PMID: 37410096 PMCID: PMC10773003 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While cigarette smoking has declined among the U.S. general population, sale and use of non-cigarette alternative tobacco products (ATP; e.g., e-cigarettes, cigars) and dual use of cigarettes/ATPs are rising. Little is known about ATP use patterns in cancer survivors enrolled in clinical trials. We investigated prevalence of tobacco product use, and factors associated with past 30-day use, among patients with cancer in national trials. METHODS Cancer survivors (N = 756) enrolled in 9 ECOG-ACRIN clinical trials (2017-2021) completed a modified Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire (C-TUQ) which assessed baseline cigarette and ATP use since cancer diagnosis and in the past 30 days. RESULTS Patients were on average 59 years old, 70% male, and the mean time since cancer diagnosis was 26 months. Since diagnosis, cigarettes (21%) were the most common tobacco product used, followed by smokeless tobacco use (5%), cigars (4%), and e-cigarettes (2%). In the past 30 days, 12% of patients reported smoking cigarettes, 4% cigars, 4% using smokeless tobacco, and 2% e-cigarettes. Since cancer diagnosis, 5.5% of the sample reported multiple tobacco product use, and 3.0% reported multiple product use in the past 30 days. Males (vs. females; OR 4.33; P = 0 < 0.01) and individuals not living with another person who smokes (vs. living with; OR, 8.07; P = 0 < 0.01) were more likely to use ATPs only versus cigarettes only in the past 30 days. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with cancer, cigarettes were the most prevalent tobacco product reported. IMPACT Regardless, ATPs and multiple tobacco product use should be routinely assessed in cancer care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - F. Stephen Hodi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Elyse R. Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cooke ME, Edwards RR, Wheeler GL, Schmitt WA, Nielsen LV, Streck JM, Schuster RM, Potter K, Evins AE, Gilman JM. Pain catastrophizing is associated with reduced neural response to monetary reward. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2023; 4:1129353. [PMID: 37745802 PMCID: PMC10512714 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1129353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pain catastrophizing, a measure of an individual's negative emotional and cognitive appraisals of pain, has been included as a key treatment target in many psychological interventions for pain. However, the neural correlates of pain catastrophizing have been understudied. Prior neuroimaging evidence suggests that adults with pain show altered reward processing throughout the mesocorticolimbic reward circuitry. Methods In this study, we tested the association between Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) scores and neural activation to the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) reward neuroimaging task in 94 adults reporting a range of pain, insomnia, and mood symptoms. Results Results indicated that PCS score but not pain intensity was significantly associated with blunted activation in the caudate and putamen in response to feedback of successful vs. unsuccessful trials on the MID task. Mediation analyses indicated that PCS score fully mediated the relationship between depression symptoms and reward activation. Discussion These findings provide evidence that pain catastrophizing is independently associated with altered striatal function apart from depression symptoms and pain intensity. Thus, in individuals experiencing pain and/or co- morbid conditions, reward dysfunction is directly related to pain catastrophizing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E. Cooke
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center in Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert R. Edwards
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States
| | - Grace L. Wheeler
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center in Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - William A. Schmitt
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center in Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Lindsay V. Nielsen
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Randi M. Schuster
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kevin Potter
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - A. Eden Evins
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jodi M. Gilman
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center in Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Streck JM, Klevens RM, O'Cleirigh C, Batchelder AW. Injection of Methamphetamine Has Increased in Boston, Massachusetts: 5 Waves of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention State Surveillance Data. J Addict Med 2023; 17:349-352. [PMID: 37267188 PMCID: PMC10149569 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the United States, the number of overdose deaths related to opioids in combination with stimulants has increased; however, the Northeast has typically been less impacted by stimulant overdose. Injection drug use (IDU) results in high mortality from overdose and infectious disease and there are racial disparities observed in overdose death rates. We examined trends in stimulant and opioid IDU, including trends stratified by race, using 5 waves of cross-sectional state surveillance data. METHODS Data came from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system Boston, Massachusetts site, which includes 5 waves of data (2005-2018) among adults in the Boston metropolitan area reporting IDU (N = 2550). Outcome measures were type of substance injected in the past 12 months (heroin, prescription opioids, "speedball," cocaine, crack, and/or methamphetamine). RESULTS Participants were 70% male, 58% non-Hispanic White, and injected a mean of 3 different drugs in the past 12 months. From 2015 to 2018, there was a more than 2-fold increase in injection of methamphetamine (15% vs 38%, P < 0.001), a pattern which held across racial groups. Combination heroin and methamphetamine injection increased from 2015 (15%) to 2018 (35%, P < 0.001). Multiple drug injection (injecting >1 drug) increased significantly across years compared with single drug injection ( P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that increased use of methamphetamine and opioids extends to Boston. There is an urgent need for enhanced screening of methamphetamine use among those using opioids and increased access and payor coverage of efficacious treatments for stimulant and opioid use disorders (eg, contingency management and medication treatment for opioid use disorder).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (JMS, CO, AWB); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (JMS, CO, AWB); Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA (RMK); and The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA (CO, AWB)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Streck JM, Regan S, Werner M, Glynn A, Villanti AC, Park ER, Wakeman SE, Evins AE, Rigotti NA. Preliminary feasibility of integrating tobacco treatment into SUD peer recovery coaching: a mixed-methods study of peer recovery coaches. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2023; 18:25. [PMID: 37122035 PMCID: PMC10148997 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-023-00380-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) have high prevalence of cigarette smoking and difficulty quitting. Peer recovery coaches (PRCs; individuals with lived SUD experience) facilitate SUD behavior change in recoverees but it is unknown if/how they address tobacco treatment in SUD recovery coaching. We assessed PRC's tobacco-related practices and attitudes about tobacco treatment in SUD recovery. METHODS The Tobacco use In Peer-recovery Study (TIPS) was a cross-sectional mixed-methods pilot survey (January-March 2022) of the 26 PRCs employed by a Massachusetts-based healthcare system's 12 SUD treatment clinics/programs. PRCs completed a quantitative survey (n = 23/26; 88%) and a telephone-based qualitative interview (n = 20/26; 77%). RESULTS One-third of PRCs reported current smoking, 50% reported former smoking, and 18% never smoked. Among PRCs, 61% reported accompanying recoverees outdoors to smoke, 26% smoked with recoverees, 17% had provided cigarettes to recoverees, 32% used smoking to help build peer-relationships, and 74% rated smoking as socially acceptable in SUD treatment. PRCs reported regularly talking to recoverees about tobacco treatment (65%), believed they should have a role in helping recoverees quit smoking (52%), and were interested in tobacco treatment training (65%). A majority of both nonsmoking and current smoking PRCs (73% vs. 57%) regularly talked to recoverees about quitting smoking. CONCLUSION PRCs' attitudes about integrating tobacco treatment into SUD recovery coaching were generally positive and PRCs reported they could have a role in helping recoverees with tobacco treatment. Barriers to integrating tobacco treatment into SUD recovery include use of cigarettes as a peer-recovery tool and high prevalence and social acceptability of smoking in SUD recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Susan Regan
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Werner
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexia Glynn
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea C Villanti
- Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Elyse R Park
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah E Wakeman
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Eden Evins
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Klemperer EM, Streck JM, Lindson N, West JC, Su A, Hughes JR, Carpenter MJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to induce attempts to quit tobacco among adults not ready to quit. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2023; 31:541-559. [PMID: 35771496 PMCID: PMC10106992 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of past-year smoking cessation remains below 10% in the U.S. Most who smoke are not ready to quit in the near future. Cessation requires both (a) initiating a quit attempt (QA) and (b) maintaining abstinence. Most research has focused on abstinence among people already motivated to quit. We systematically reviewed interventions to promote QAs among people not motivated to quit tobacco. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Embase, and our personal libraries for randomized trials of tobacco interventions that reported QAs as an outcome among adults not ready to quit. We screened studies and extracted data in duplicate. We pooled findings of the 25 included studies using Mantel-Haenszel random effects meta-analyses when ≥ 2 studies tested the same intervention. Most (24) trials addressed cigarettes and one addressed smokeless tobacco. Substantial heterogeneity among trials resulted in a series of small meta-analyses. Findings indicate varenicline may increase QAs more than no varenicline, n = 320; RR = 1.4, 95% CI [1.1, 1.7]; I² = 0%, and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) may increase QAs more than no NRT, n = 2,568; RR = 1.1, 95% CI [1.02, 1.3]; I² = 0%. Pooled effects for motivational counseling, reduction counseling, and very low nicotine content cigarettes showed no clear evidence of benefit or harm. The evidence was judged to be of medium to very low certainty due to imprecision, inconsistency, and risk of bias, suggesting that further research is likely to change interpretation of our results. Findings demonstrate the need for more high-quality research on interventions to induce QAs among adults not ready to quit tobacco. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias M. Klemperer
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- Tobacco Research & Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School
| | - Nicola Lindson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
| | - Julia C. West
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
| | - Alan Su
- University of Vermont Medical Center
| | - John R. Hughes
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
| | - Matthew J. Carpenter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences & Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steffens EB, Park ER, Muzikansky A, Streck JM, Ostroff JS, Rasmussen AW, Ponzani C, Perez GK, Regan S, Rigotti NA, Irwin KE. Patients With Serious Mental Illness Can Engage in Tobacco Treatment Trials and Tobacco Cessation Interventions During Cancer Treatment. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e238-e247. [PMID: 36351206 PMCID: PMC9970276 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE More than half of individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) smoke, contributing to premature cancer mortality. A cancer diagnosis provides an opportunity to assist with smoking cessation; however, supportive oncology trials frequently exclude patients with SMI. To fill this gap, we examined differences in engagement and tobacco cessation in a pragmatic clinical trial. METHODS We recruited 303 participants from two National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers, of which 10% had prior diagnoses of SMI (major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia spectrum disorders). We compared self-reported smoking behaviors, patient attitudes and beliefs about cessation, and rates of trial completion, engagement, and smoking abstinence among recently diagnosed patients with cancer with and without SMI. Six months after trial completion, we completed qualitative interviews on barriers and facilitators to tobacco cessation in a random sample of participants with SMI. RESULTS Trial participants with SMI had similar motivation to quit smoking as those without SMI. Additionally, participants with SMI had a similar ability to engage in a tobacco treatment trial (6.5 counseling sessions completed v 7.3 sessions) and benefit from tobacco treatment as those without SMI (32.3% v 27.8% 6-month quit rates). CONCLUSION Patients with cancer and SMI were able to engage in and benefit from a tobacco cessation trial integrated into cancer care. A cancer diagnosis provides an opportunity to assist patients with SMI with smoking cessation referrals and treatment. Pragmatic supportive oncology trials that include a diverse population of adults with SMI are needed to inform care delivery and improve cancer outcomes for patients with SMI and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor B. Steffens
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri—St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Elyse R. Park
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Center for Psychiatric Oncology and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA
| | - Alona Muzikansky
- MGH Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jamie S. Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Autumn W. Rasmussen
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Colin Ponzani
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Giselle K. Perez
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Susan Regan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy A. Rigotti
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kelly E. Irwin
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Center for Psychiatric Oncology and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Schizophrenia Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Browning KO, DeSarno MJ, Davis DR, Streck JM, Bergeria CL, Harfmann RF, Parker MA, Heil SH, Sigmon SC, Gaalema DE, Tidey JW, Lee DC, Tetreault HJ, Higgins ST. Relating individual differences in the reinforcing value of smoking and dependence severity to nicotine exposure levels in vulnerable populations. Prev Med 2022; 165:107312. [PMID: 36272516 PMCID: PMC9986960 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Cigarette smoking is overrepresented in populations with psychiatric conditions and socioeconomic disadvantage. Greater understanding of the role of reinforcement and nicotine dependence in smoking among vulnerable populations may facilitate development of better targeted interventions to reduce smoking. Prior research demonstrated that individual differences in the reinforcing value of smoking and nicotine-dependence severity predicted total nicotine-exposure in vulnerable populations. The present study uses multivariate regression to address two aims: (1) Quantify the degree to which the reinforcing value of smoking, assessed using the Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT), and dependence severity assessed using the Fagerström Test of Nicotine Dependence and Brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (B-WISDM) each account for individual differences in cotinine-plus-3'-hydroxycotinine (COT+3HC) levels. (2) Explore whether there is overlap in the variance accounted for by the CTP, FTND, and B-WISDM. Participants were 628 adults with co-morbid psychiatric conditions or socioeconomic disadvantage who smoked daily. The CPT, FTND, and B-WISDM models accounted for 23.76%, 32.45%, and 29.61% of the variance in COT+3HC levels, respectively. Adding CPT to the FTND model failed to increase the variance accounted for and adding it to the B-WISDM model did so by only 1.2% demonstrating considerable overlap in the variance in nicotine exposure levels accounted for by these three instruments. These results provide new knowledge on the relationship between individual differences in the reinforcing value of smoking and nicotine-exposure levels and suggest differences in reinforcing value may underpin a considerable portion of the variance in nicotine exposure accounted for by dependence severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn O Browning
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Michael J DeSarno
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Danielle R Davis
- Yale University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Cecilia L Bergeria
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Roxanne F Harfmann
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Maria A Parker
- School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Dustin C Lee
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Haley J Tetreault
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kalkhoran S, Streck JM, Kruse GR, Rigotti NA, Perez GK, Regan S, Ponzani CJ, Muzikansky A, Park ER, Ostroff JS. Longitudinal Electronic Cigarette Use Among Patients Recently Diagnosed With Cancer Enrolled in a Smoking Cessation Trial. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:970-977. [PMID: 35134988 PMCID: PMC9199950 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many cancer patients who smoke report concurrent e-cigarette use. Using a mixed-methods approach, we aimed to (1) describe longitudinal e-cigarette use over 6 months after a cancer diagnosis and (2) assess the association between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation, among cancer patients in a smoking cessation trial. AIMS AND METHODS Data were from a 2-site randomized controlled trial of Standard (brief counseling) versus Intensive treatment (sustained counseling plus smoking cessation medication) in individuals who smoke recently diagnosed with cancer. Participants (n = 303) reported e-cigarette use at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Biochemically-verified past 7-day cigarette abstinence was collected at 6 months. Qualitative interviews at 6 months explored factors related to e-cigarette use. RESULTS E-cigarette use prevalence was highest between baseline and 3 months (16%) and declined over time. Participants using e-cigarettes at follow-up had higher baseline cigarette dependence and smoked more heavily. Multivariable analyses found no significant association between follow-up e-cigarette use and 6-month cigarette abstinence. E-cigarette use at follow-up was higher in the Standard versus Intensive treatment group (p = .003 and .001 at 3 and 6 mo, respectively). Smoking cessation and health concerns were primary reasons for using e-cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS Among individuals who smoke recently diagnosed with cancer and enrolled in a smoking cessation intervention trial, e-cigarette use during trial participation was not associated with smoking abstinence. Individuals who chose to use e-cigarettes were less likely to be receiving intensive cessation support as part of the trial. Further studies are needed to evaluate the association between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation in cancer patients. IMPLICATIONS E-cigarette use was not associated with cigarette abstinence at 6 months among adults who smoke recently diagnosed with cancer enrolled in a smoking cessation trial. Individuals with easier access to evidence-based smoking cessation treatment may be less likely to use e-cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Kalkhoran
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research (HPRIR) Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gina R Kruse
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giselle K Perez
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research (HPRIR) Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Colin J Ponzani
- The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Elyse R Park
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research (HPRIR) Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Streck JM, Regan S, Neil J, Kalkhoran S, Gupta PS, Bearnot B, Coker FK, Kalagher KM, Park ER, Wakeman S, Rigotti NA. Interest in Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation Among Adults With Opioid Use Disorder in Buprenorphine Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Investigation. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:1134-1138. [PMID: 34915581 PMCID: PMC9199932 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Individuals in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) have high smoking rates and limited success with Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cessation aids, suggesting need for novel approaches. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) might benefit this population, but e-cigarettes' acceptability for tobacco reduction or cessation among smokers in OUD treatment is not known. METHODS A cross-sectional mixed-methods study of 222 adults in OUD treatment with buprenorphine in the Boston, Massachusetts metropolitan area was conducted in 2020. We used quantitative and qualitative data to investigate individuals' experience with and interest in e-cigarettes and other methods for smoking cessation and assessed factors associated with interest in e-cigarette use. RESULTS One hundred sixty (72%) of the 222 participants were past 30-day cigarette smokers. They most frequently reported having ever used nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; 83%) and e-cigarettes (71%) for smoking cessation and most often indicated interest in using NRT (71%) and e-cigarettes (44%) for future smoking cessation. In multiple logistic regression analysis, interest in using e-cigarettes for future smoking cessation was independently associated with having ever used e-cigarettes for smoking cessation, current e-cigarette use, and perceiving e-cigarettes to be less harmful than cigarettes (ps < .05). In qualitative data, many current vapers/former smokers reported that e-cigarettes had been helpful for quitting cigarettes. For current smokers who currently or formerly vaped, frequently reported challenges in switching to e-cigarettes were concerns about replacing one addiction with another and e-cigarettes not adequately substituting for cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS E-cigarettes had a moderate level of acceptability for smoking cessation among cigarette smokers in OUD treatment. More research is warranted to test the efficacy of this approach. IMPLICATIONS Individuals in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) have high smoking rates and limited success with existing smoking cessation tools, suggesting a need for novel cessation treatment approaches. In this mixed-methods study of individuals receiving medication treatment for OUD with buprenorphine in Massachusetts in 2020, we found a moderate level of acceptability of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Jordan Neil
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Sara Kalkhoran
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Priya S Gupta
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Bearnot
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Faith K Coker
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Kelly M Kalagher
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Elyse R Park
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Wakeman
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Walter AW, Lee JW, Gareen IF, Kircher SM, Herman BA, Streck JM, Kumar S, Mayer IA, Saba NF, Neal JW, Atkins MB, Hodi FS, Kyriakopoulos C, Tempany C, Shanafelt TD, Wagner LI, Land SR, Ostroff JS, Park ER. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, tobacco use, and cessation indicators among adults with cancer in the United States: Results from 10 ECOG-ACRIN trials. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.6514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6514 Background: Tobacco use is a modifiable risk factor for adverse outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer. Despite ASCO’s recommendation for assessment and treatment of tobacco use, integration into cancer care is suboptimal. Socioeconomic contexts influence access and utilization of tobacco treatment, but little is known about the relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (NSD) and tobacco assessment, assistance, and cessation among cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials. Methods: The NCI Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire (C-TUQ) was centrally administered to participants enrolled in 10 ECOG ACRIN clinical trials (9 therapeutic, 1 imaging). We examined associations of NSD with patient-reported rates of receiving brief tobacco cessation support (i.e., Ask, Assist (counseling)) and cessation (past 30d quit attempts and duration). NSD was measured using the national Area Deprivation Index (ADI) based on participant’s zip code. Associations between ADI (low, intermediate, and high) and tobacco variables were evaluated using logistic regression and ANOVA. Results: 740 patients, completing the C-TUQ between June 2017-October 2021, can be classified as 402 (54%) never smokers, 81 (11%) current smokers, and 257 (35%) former smokers. Patients were 70% male; 94% white; 3% Hispanic; mean age 58.8 (SD 9.0). Cancer diagnoses were 36% leukemia; 19% lymphoma, 18% prostate, 11% breast; 9% melanoma, 7% myeloma, and 0.5% head and neck. Patients were categorized into high (33%), intermediate (34%) and low (33%) disadvantaged neighborhoods. Patients in high (vs. low) disadvantaged neighborhoods were more likely to report being asked about smoking (OR = 3.90; 95% CI (confidence interval), 1.61 to 9.46; p = 0.0062) but less likely to report receiving counseling to help quit smoking (OR = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.73; p = 0.0234). Patients from high disadvantaged neighborhoods had the shortest quit duration, followed by patients from intermediate and low disadvantaged neighborhoods (mean = 145.78, 187.66, and 210.98 months, respectively, p = 0.0372). Conclusions: Greater socioeconomic neighborhood disadvantage was associated with increased assessment of tobacco use but decreased tobacco treatment referral, and the shortest quit duration. More research is needed to promote increased referral to tobacco treatment for individuals with cancer from disadvantaged neighborhoods to promote and sustain cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nabil F. Saba
- Winship Cancer Institute Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Joel W. Neal
- Stanford University, Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elyse R. Park
- Department of Psychiatry and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Streck JM, Walter AW, Temel JS, Jawahri AE, Shin HJ, Regan S, Muzikansky A, Ponzani CJ, Ostroff JS, Park ER. Investigating documentation of alcohol and non-medical substance use in oncology treatment: an electronic health record review. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4275-4281. [PMID: 35088148 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06688-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about non-tobacco substance use (SU) and its treatment in cancer patients. National guidelines address tobacco only, and assessment of SU in cancer patients is not standardized. It is not clear how oncology clinicians assess, document, and follow-up on SU. METHODS We conducted an electronic health record review of patients enrolled in a smoking cessation trial at one large hospital site (N = 176). Chart review of oncology treatment notes assessed whether SU assessment was documented, the content of the documentation/assessment (e.g., frequency of use), and details about documentation (e.g., where/who documented). RESULTS Sixty-nine percent (121/176) of cancer patients had SU documented. Many patients (42%, 74/176) had only one substance documented; 66% (116/176) had alcohol use documented. For a substantial minority of patients (43/176; 24%), the provider did not specify the substance assessed (e.g., "drug use," "illicits"). SU was primarily documented by physicians (84%, 102/121), in routine progress notes (56%, 68/121), in the "social history" section of the note (84%, 102/121). Only 4 patients had a documented SU follow-up plan. When examining the subset of patients who reported problematic alcohol use (N = 27), the content of documentation was inconsistent (e.g., number of drinks/day vs. qualitative descriptors of use). CONCLUSIONS About 1/3 of oncology patients did not have SU assessment documented. SU other than alcohol use was infrequently documented, many clinicians documented SU but did not specify substance type, and few clinicians documented a follow-up plan for problematic SU. Oncology settings should utilize standardized assessment and referral for SU treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA. .,Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, The Mongan Institute, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Angela W Walter
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, The Mongan Institute, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Hyo Jin Shin
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Colin J Ponzani
- Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, The Mongan Institute, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elyse R Park
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA.,Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Health Promotion and Resiliency Intervention Research Program, The Mongan Institute, MGH, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Streck JM, Regan S, Kalkhoran S, Kalagher KM, Bearnot B, Gupta PS, Wakeman S, Rigotti NA. Perceptions of E-cigarettes among adults in treatment for opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend Rep 2022; 2:100023. [PMID: 36845890 PMCID: PMC9949332 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) have a high prevalence of smoking and limited success quitting smoking with existing tools. There is ongoing debate about whether electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may be a viable harm reduction strategy. We sought to determine the potential acceptability of e-cigarettes for cigarette harm reduction among individuals receiving medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) with buprenorphine. Among individuals receiving MOUD we investigated health harm perceptions of cigarettes, nicotine e-cigarettes, and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and perceptions of the helpfulness of e-cigarettes and NRT for quitting cigarettes. Methods Cross-sectional telephone survey conducted among adults in buprenorphine treatment at five community health centers in the Boston, MA metropolitan area from February to July 2020. Results 93% and 63% of participants rated cigarettes and e-cigarettes, respectively, as very or extremely harmful to health, and 62% rated NRT as not to slightly harmful to health. Over half (58%) rated cigarettes as more harmful than e-cigarettes; 65% and 83% perceived e-cigarettes and NRT, respectively, to be helpful for reducing/quitting cigarette use. In bivariate analyses, nicotine e-cigarette users, compared to nonusers, perceived e-cigarettes to be less harmful to health and more often rated e-cigarettes as helpful for reducing/quitting cigarette use (both p<0.05). Conclusions This study suggests that Massachusetts patients receiving MOUD with buprenorphine have concerns about the health harms of e-cigarettes yet rate them as helpful tools for reducing or quitting cigarette smoking. Future research is needed to test the efficacy of e-cigarettes for cigarette harm reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M. Streck
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara Kalkhoran
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelly M. Kalagher
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Bearnot
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Priya S. Gupta
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Wakeman
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy A. Rigotti
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Streck JM, Luberto CM, Muzikansky A, Skurla S, Ponzani CJ, Perez GK, Hall DL, Gonzalez A, Mahaffey B, Rigotti NA, Ostroff JS, Park ER. Corrigendum to “Examining the effects of stress and psychological distress on smoking abstinence in cancer patients” [Prev. Med. Rep. 23 (2021) 101402]. Prev Med Rep 2022; 25:101693. [PMID: 35127366 PMCID: PMC8800054 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
20
|
Oliver AC, DeSarno M, Irvin CG, Kaminsky D, Tidey JW, Sigmon SC, Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Lee D, Bunn JY, Davis DR, Streck JM, Gallagher T, Higgins ST. Effects of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes on Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Self-Reported Respiratory Health Outcomes Among Smokers With Psychiatric Conditions or Socioeconomic Disadvantage. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:135-140. [PMID: 34255068 PMCID: PMC8826384 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study examined whether exposure to reduced-nicotine-content cigarettes (RNCCs) for 12 weeks alters respiratory health using Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO), a validated biomarker of respiratory epithelial health, and the Respiratory Health Questionnaire (RHQ), a subject-rated questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. Participants were 747 adult daily smokers enrolled in three double-blind, randomized clinical trials evaluating effects of cigarette nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco) in people with affective disorders, opioid use disorder (OUD), or socioeconomic disadvantage. AIMS AND METHODS FeNO levels and RHQ ratings were collected at baseline and Weeks 6 and 12 following randomization. Multiple regression was used to assess associations of FeNO and RHQ with smoking characteristics. Mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA was used to evaluate the effects of nicotine content on FeNO and RHQ outcomes over the 12-week study period. RESULTS FeNO levels but not RHQ ratings varied inversely with smoking characteristics at baseline (Ps < 0.0001) in smokers with affective disorders and socioeconomic disadvantage but less so in those with OUD. Participants with affective disorders and socioeconomic disadvantage, but not those with OUD, who were assigned to RNCCs had higher FeNO levels at Week 12 than those assigned to the 15.8 mg/g dose [F(2,423) = 4.51, p = .01, Cohen's d = 0.21]. No significant dose-related changes in RHQ scores were identified. CONCLUSIONS Use of RNCCs across a 12-week period attenuates smoking-related reductions in FeNO levels in smokers with affective disorders and socioeconomic disadvantage although not those with OUD. FeNO changes were not accompanied by changes in respiratory-health ratings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the sample and experimental manipulation of the nicotine content of assigned cigarettes are registered: NCT02232737, NCT02250664, NCT02250534. The FeNO measure reported in this manuscript is an exploratory outcome that was not registered. IMPLICATIONS Should a reduced nicotine content standard be implemented; these results suggest that reduced nicotine content in cigarettes will not exacerbate and instead may attenuate smoking-related decreases in FeNO. This is significant as NO is an important component in maintaining a healthy respiratory system and necessary to defend against infection. Furthermore, the results of the current study demonstrate that the adoption of the reduced nicotine content standard may result in beneficial impacts on respiratory epithelial health among vulnerable populations that are disproportionally affected by the adverse health outcomes precipitated by combustible tobacco use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony C Oliver
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Michael DeSarno
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Charles G Irvin
- Vermont Lung Center, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - David Kaminsky
- Vermont Lung Center, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Dustin Lee
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Janice Y Bunn
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Danielle R Davis
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas Gallagher
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Streck JM, Parker MA, Bearnot B, Kalagher K, Sigmon SC, Goodwin RD, Weinberger AH. National Trends in Suicide Thoughts and Behavior among US Adults with Opioid Use Disorder from 2015 to 2020. Subst Use Misuse 2022; 57:876-885. [PMID: 35232317 PMCID: PMC9084338 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2046102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Suicide thoughts and behavior (STB) are associated with premature mortality and is disproportionately represented among those with opioid use disorder (OUD). Recent trends in STB among those with OUD are lacking. We investigated trends in STB among US adults with versus without OUD using six waves of cross-sectional, nationally-representative, epidemiological data. METHODS Data came from the 2015-2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (combined n = 241,675). We compared past-year STB outcomes (i.e., thoughts of seriously considering killing self (SI), suicide plan (SP), suicide attempt (SA)) among adults with versus without past-year OUD. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression tested the association between survey-year and past-year STB outcomes (i.e., SI, SP/SA) stratified by OUD status. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2020, 26% versus 4% of those with and without OUD, respectively, reported SI, 10% versus 1% reported a SP, and 6% versus 1% reported SA (all ps < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, across survey years, no changes in the prevalence of SI were observed for adults with or without OUD, and no changes were observed over time for SP/SA in adults with or without OUD. OUD severity and treatment status did not moderate the relationship between OUD and STB outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Among US adults, OUD was associated with thoughts of suicide and suicide behavior. The heightened prevalence of STB in adults with OUD has not changed in recent years. Screening for SI is needed among those reporting opioid misuse and should be routinely integrated into OUD prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine (DGIM), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)/Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, MGH/HMS, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maria A Parker
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Benjamin Bearnot
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine (DGIM), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)/Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kelly Kalagher
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine (DGIM), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)/Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Renee D Goodwin
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, The City University of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrea H Weinberger
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York, USA.,Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Streck JM, Regan S, Bearnot B, Gupta PS, Kalkhoran S, Kalagher KM, Wakeman S, Rigotti NA. Prevalence of Cannabis Use and Cannabis Route of Administration among Massachusetts Adults in Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder. Subst Use Misuse 2022; 57:1104-1110. [PMID: 35410577 PMCID: PMC10091221 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2063899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent prevalence estimates of cannabis use among individuals receiving medication treatment for OUD (MOUD) are lacking, and no study has characterized cannabis route of administration (cROA) in this population. These knowledge gaps are relevant because cannabis' effects and health outcomes vary by cROA and the availability and perceptions of cROA (e.g., vaping devices) are changing. METHODS The Vaping In Buprenorphine-treated patients Evaluation (VIBE) cross-sectional survey assessed the prevalence and correlates of cannabis use and cROA among adults receiving buprenorphine MOUD from 02/20 to 07/20 at five community health centers in Massachusetts, a state with legal recreational and medical cannabis use. RESULTS Among the 92/222 (41%) respondents reporting past 30-day cannabis use, smoking was the most common cROA (75%), followed by vaping (38%), and eating (26%). Smoking was more often used as a single cROA vs. in combination others (p = 0.01), whereas vaping, eating, and dabbing were more often used in combination with another cROA (all p < 0.05). Of the 39% of participants reporting multiple cROA, smoking and vaping (61%), and smoking and eating (50%), were the most prevalent combinations. Nonwhite race (vs. white) and current cigarette smoking (vs. no nicotine use) were associated with past 30-day cannabis use in multiple logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence of past 30-day cannabis use among individuals receiving buprenorphine MOUD in Massachusetts in 2020 was nearly double the prevalence of cannabis use in Massachusetts' adult general population in 2019 (21%). Our data are consistent with state and national data showing smoking as the most common cROA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin Bearnot
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Priya S Gupta
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara Kalkhoran
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kelly M Kalagher
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah Wakeman
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Parker MA, Cordoba-Grueso WS, Streck JM, Goodwin RD, Weinberger AH. Intersectionality of serious psychological distress, cigarette smoking, and substance use disorders in the United States: 2008-2018. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 228:109095. [PMID: 34601273 PMCID: PMC8595675 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serious psychological distress (SPD) is common among adults who smoke cigarettes and among adults with substance use disorders (SUD). It is unknown whether the burden of SPD is even greater among individuals with both cigarette smoking and SUDs. This study examined the intersectionality of SPD, cigarette smoking, and SUD over time. METHODS Data came from annual, cross-sectional, nationally representative samples of the United States (US) National Survey on Drug Use and Health (individuals age 12+). Past-month SPD prevalences were estimated each year from 2008 to 2018 for adults age 18+ with current daily, current non-daily, former, and never cigarette smoking by SUD status (combined n = 441,286). Logistic regression models examined linear time trends of SPD. RESULTS In 2018, SPD was significantly more prevalent among adults in each smoking group with SUD versus those without SUD (daily 29.1% vs. 9.0%, non-daily 23.2% vs. 8.6%, former 19.5% vs. 3.2%, never 16.4% vs. 4.3%). After adjusting for sociodemographics, SPD prevalence increased over time across smoking statuses with a larger change for persons with SUD (AOR=1.07; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.09) vs. no SUD (AOR=1.03; 95% CI: 1.02. 1.04). CONCLUSIONS SPD was more than twice as common among adults with SUD who smoke cigarettes compared to those without SUD who do not smoke cigarettes, with the highest prevalence among adults with both SUD and daily smoking. While SPD has increased over time, differences depended on SUD status beyond the effect of cigarette smoking. These results provide further evidence for treating smoking and mental health problems together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A. Parker
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Whitney S. Cordoba-Grueso
- Indiana University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Renee D. Goodwin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, The City University of New York School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea H. Weinberger
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Higgins ST, DeSarno M, Bunn JY, Gaalema DE, Leventhal AM, Davis DR, Streck JM, Harfmann RF, Markesich C, Orr E, Sigmon SC, Heil SH, Tidey JW, Lee D, Hughes JR. Cumulative vulnerabilities as a potential moderator of response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes. Prev Med 2021; 152:106714. [PMID: 34242666 PMCID: PMC8906391 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Risk for smoking increases in a summative manner corresponding to the number of co-occurring vulnerabilities present (cumulative vulnerability). We examined whether cumulative vulnerabilities moderate response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes in a secondary analysis of results from 775 participants in three 12-week randomized clinical trials examining research cigarettes varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco). Participants were categorized as having 0-1, 2-3, or ≥ 4 cumulative vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities included: rural residence, current substance use disorder, current affective disorder, low educational attainment, poverty, unemployment, physical disability. The primary outcome was total cigarettes per day (CPD) during Week 12; secondary outcomes included CPD across weeks, toxin exposure, dependence severity, craving/withdrawal (17 dependent measures). Results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of covariance and growth-curve modeling. Total CPD during Week 12 increased as cumulative-vulnerability increased (P = 0.004), and decreased as nicotine content decreased (P < 0.001), with no significant interaction of cumulative vulnerability and dose (P = 0.67). Effects on other outcomes generally followed that same pattern. The only exception across the other outcomes was on Questionnaire-on-Smoking-Urges Factor-2 ratings for usual-brand cigarettes where cumulative vulnerability, dose, and time interacted (P = 0.007), with craving at the 0.4 and 2.4 mg/g doses decreasing over time, but inconsistently across vulnerability categories. Overall, we saw little evidence that cumulative vulnerabilities moderate response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes suggesting that a policy reducing nicotine content in cigarettes to minimally addictive levels could benefit even highly vulnerable smokers including those residing in rural or other regions with overrepresentation of co-occurring vulnerabilities. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT02232737, NCT02250664, NCT02250534.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
| | - Michael DeSarno
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Janice Y Bunn
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Adam M Leventhal
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Danielle R Davis
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Roxanne F Harfmann
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Catherine Markesich
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Eva Orr
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Dustin Lee
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John R Hughes
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sylvia LG, George N, Rabideau DJ, Streck JM, Albury E, Hall DL, Luberto CM, Mizrach HR, Perez GK, Crute S, Mehta DH, Convery MS, Looby SE, Fricchione G, Fava M, Wilhelm S, Park ER. Moderators of a resiliency group intervention for frontline clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord 2021; 293:373-378. [PMID: 34243059 PMCID: PMC8712555 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To mitigate the psychological burdens of COVID-19 for frontline clinicians (FCs), we adapted an existing evidence-based resiliency program, Stress Management and Resilience Training Relaxation Response Program (SMART-3RP), for FCs. This analysis explores moderators of stress coping to determine which subgroups of FCs benefited most from SMART-3RP. METHODS 102 FCs from Mass General Brigham hospitals engaged in the adapted SMART-3RP. Assessments were completed at group entry (Week 0) and completion (Week 4). The primary outcome was stress coping, and we examined 15 possible baseline moderators. We fit linear mixed effects regression models and assessed potential baseline moderators using a likelihood ratio test. We report model-based estimates and confidence intervals for each moderator-by-time interaction (i.e., differential effect), where positive/negative values indicate more/less improvement in average perceived stress coping. RESULTS Stress coping improved from Week 0 to Week 4 (mean improvement [95% CI] = 0.9 [0.6 to 1.2]). FCs with higher anxiety (differential effect [95% CI] = 0.3 [0.1 to 0.4]), depression (0.4 [0.2 to 0.6]), and loneliness (0.4 [0.1 to 0.6]), but lower levels of mindfulness (CAMS-Rfocus: 1.0 [0.4 to 1.6]; CAMS-Raccept: 1.3 [0.7 to 2.0]) and self-compassion (0.4, [0.1 to 0.8]) at baseline experienced greater benefits in perceived stress coping from the SMART-3RP. Baseline health uncertainty along with sociodemographic and work characteristics did not moderate stress coping. DISCUSSION Results highlight particular sub-populations of FCs that may benefit more from a stress management intervention, especially during emergency responses (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa G Sylvia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Dauten Family Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Nevita George
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Dauten Family Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dustin J Rabideau
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan Albury
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Dauten Family Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel L Hall
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christina M Luberto
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helen R Mizrach
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giselle K Perez
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sydney Crute
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Darshan H Mehta
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Susan Convery
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara E Looby
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gregory Fricchione
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maurizio Fava
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sabine Wilhelm
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elyse R Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Streck JM, Luberto CM, Muzikansky A, Skurla S, Ponzani CJ, Perez GK, Hall DL, Gonzalez A, Mahaffey B, Rigotti NA, Ostroff JS, Park ER. Examining the effects of stress and psychological distress on smoking abstinence in cancer patients. Prev Med Rep 2021; 23:101402. [PMID: 34094817 PMCID: PMC8163988 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer patients who smoke report more stress and psychological distress than patients who do not smoke. It is unclear how these emotional symptoms may modify smoking behavior in cancer patients. We examined the influence of a smoking cessation intervention for cancer patients on stress and distress, and the effects of these symptoms on smoking abstinence. METHODS Mixed-methods secondary analysis of data from the Smokefree Support Study, a two-site randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of Intensive (IT; n = 153) vs. Standard Treatment (ST; n = 150) for smoking cessation in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Stress coping, perceived stress, distress, and anxiety were self-reported at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Abstinence was biochemically-confirmed at 6 months. A subset of patients (n = 72) completed qualitative exit-interviews. RESULTS Patients were on average, 58 years old, 56% female, and smoked a median of 10 cigarettes/day. There were no significant treatment group × time interactions or main effects of treatment group on stress or distress measures (p's > 0.05), however there were significant main effects of time suggesting symptom improvements on each measure in both study groups (p's < 0.05). In adjusted logistic regression models, lower levels anxiety at 3 months predicted confirmed smoking abstinence at 6 months (p = .03). Qualitatively, at 6 months, patients reported their stress and smoking were connected and that the cessation counseling was helpful. CONCLUSIONS Cancer patients enrolled in a smoking cessation trial report decreases in stress, distress and anxiety over time, and anxiety symptoms may impact smoking cessation success at follow-up resulting in an important intervention target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M. Streck
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center & Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Christina M. Luberto
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center & Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Alona Muzikansky
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Center for Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Sarah Skurla
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Colin J. Ponzani
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center & Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Giselle K. Perez
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center & Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Daniel L. Hall
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center & Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Adam Gonzalez
- Stony Brook University, School of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Brittain Mahaffey
- Stony Brook University, School of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Nancy A. Rigotti
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center & Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Jamie S. Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Elyse R. Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center & Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Peck KR, Ochalek TA, Streck JM, Badger GJ, Sigmon SC. Impact of Current Pain Status on Low-Barrier Buprenorphine Treatment Response Among Patients with Opioid Use Disorder. Pain Med 2021; 22:1205-1212. [PMID: 33585885 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is prevalent among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, the impact of CNCP on buprenorphine treatment outcomes is largely unknown. In this secondary analysis, we examined treatment outcomes among individuals with and without CNCP who received a low-barrier buprenorphine maintenance regimen during waitlist delays to more comprehensive opioid treatment. METHODS Participants were 28 adults with OUD who received 12 weeks of buprenorphine treatment involving bimonthly clinic visits, computerized medication dispensing, and phone-based monitoring. At intake and monthly follow-up assessments, participants completed the Brief Pain Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Addiction Severity Index, and staff-observed urinalysis. RESULTS Participants with CNCP (n = 10) achieved comparable rates of illicit opioid abstinence as those without CNCP (n = 18) at weeks 4 (90% vs 94%), 8 (80% vs 83%), and 12 (70% vs 67%) (P = 0.99). Study retention was also similar, with 90% and 83% of participants with and without CNCP completing the 12-week study, respectively (P = 0.99). Furthermore, individuals with CNCP demonstrated significant improvements on the BDI-II and Global Severity Index subscale of the BSI (P < 0.05). However, those with CNCP reported more severe medical problems and smaller reductions in legal problems relative to those without CNCP (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Despite research suggesting that chronic pain may influence OUD treatment outcomes, participants with and without CNCP achieved similar rates of treatment retention and significant reductions in illicit opioid use and psychiatric symptomatology during low-barrier buprenorphine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly R Peck
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry, Burlington, Vermont, USA.,Psychological Science, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Taylor A Ochalek
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.,Psychological Science, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.,Psychological Science, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Gary J Badger
- Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry, Burlington, Vermont, USA.,Psychological Science, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Streck JM, Hyland KA, Regan S, Muzikansky A, Rigotti NA, Ponzani CJ, Perez GK, Kalkhoran S, Ostroff JS, Park ER. Examining the effects of problematic alcohol use on cigarette abstinence in recently diagnosed cancer patients enrolled in a cessation trial: A secondary analysis. Addict Behav 2021; 115:106794. [PMID: 33385757 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Among people with cancer, dual alcohol and tobacco use increases risk for morbidity and mortality. Most smoking cessation clinical trials with this patient population have excluded individuals with problematic alcohol use. This investigation examined whether problematic alcohol use affects smoking cessation in cancer patients. METHODS Mixed-methods secondary analysis of data from the Smokefree Support Study, a randomized-controlled trial examining the efficacy of Intensive (IT; n = 153) vs. Standard Treatment (ST; n = 150) for smoking cessation in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Problematic alcohol use was assessed at enrollment using the Cut-Down-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye-Opener (CAGE), weekly frequency of alcohol use and binge drinking measures. Alcohol use was categorized as: no current alcohol use, moderate and problematic use. The primary outcome was biochemically-confirmed cigarette abstinence at 6-months. A subset of patients (n = 72) completed qualitative exit-interviews. RESULTS Among all participants, biochemically-confirmed cigarette abstinence rates were 25% (n = 32), 28% (n = 27), and 36% (n = 20) for participants reporting no current alcohol use, moderate use, and problematic use, respectively (p = 0.33). In logistic regression analysis, neither problematic alcohol use (AOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.35-2.67, p = .94) nor the problematic use by study arm interaction (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI = 0.59-8.39, p = .24) were associated with biochemically-confirmed 6-month abstinence. Qualitatively, participants reported that drinking alcohol triggers urges to smoke. CONCLUSION Newly diagnosed cancer patients reporting problematic alcohol use were not less likely to quit smoking than those without. Additional research is needed to investigate whether problematic alcohol users may benefit from smoking and alcohol behavior change interventions at the time of cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
29
|
Klemperer EM, Hughes JR, Peasley-Miklus CE, Callas PW, Cook JW, Streck JM, Morley NE. Possible New Symptoms of Tobacco Withdrawal III: Reduced Positive Affect-A Review and Meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 23:259-266. [PMID: 32188995 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most descriptions of tobacco withdrawal have not changed in >30 years despite new research. This meta-analysis tested whether abstinence leads to decreased positive affect (PA) because abstinence-induced symptom changes are a core feature of the tobacco withdrawal syndrome. In addition, we examined whether reduced PA was due to withdrawal (ie, temporary decrease in a "U-shaped" curve) or offset (ie, return to baseline) effect. METHODS Our main inclusion criterion was a prospective within-participant test of change in PA during abstinence conditions among people who smoke cigarettes daily who were not using a cessation medication. Our search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and personal libraries yielded a total of 32 tests with 2054 participants. RESULTS There was a medium effect size indicating an overall decrease in PA following abstinence from cigarettes (Cohen's d = -0.40, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.49). There was large heterogeneity (I2 = 70.7%). Most (79%) of the 24 trials that conducted significance tests reported that reduction in PA was significant. Seven tests were adequately designed to detect a withdrawal versus offset effect. Over half (57%) displayed a U-shaped curve for abstinence-induced change in PA indicative of a withdrawal symptom rather than offset effect. CONCLUSIONS Abstinence from cigarettes is associated with a decrease in PA. Whether low PA should be added to withdrawal measures and diagnostic criteria requires replication of the time-course of change in PA and tests of whether abstinence-induced changes in PA and negative affect occur independently. IMPLICATIONS Though there was substantial heterogeneity among trials, our findings suggest that (1) abstinence from cigarettes decreases positive affect and (2) this decrease may represent a withdrawal effect (vs. an offset effect). However, it is unclear whether abstinence-induced losses in positive affect are independent from increased negative affect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias M Klemperer
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.,Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - John R Hughes
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.,Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | | | - Peter W Callas
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Jessica W Cook
- Department of Medicine, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.,Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nicolas E Morley
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Park ER, Sylvia LG, Streck JM, Luberto CM, Stanton AM, Perez GK, Baim M, Bliss CC, Convery MS, Crute S, Denninger JW, Donelan K, Dossett ML, Fava M, Fredriksson S, Fricchione G, George N, Hall DL, Hart BR, Herman J, Hirschberg A, Holt D, Looby SE, Malloy L, Meek J, Mehta DH, Millstein RA, Mizrach H, Rosa K, Slawsby E, Stupinski AC, Traeger L, Vanderkruik R, Vogeli C, Wilhelm S. Launching a resiliency group program to assist frontline clinicians in meeting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a hospital-based systems trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2021; 68:111-112. [PMID: 33229013 PMCID: PMC7605784 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elyse R. Park
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Corrresponding author at: Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1600, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Louisa G. Sylvia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Christina M. Luberto
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Amelia M. Stanton
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Giselle K. Perez
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Margaret Baim
- Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Cayley C. Bliss
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Mary Susan Convery
- Social Service Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Sydney Crute
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - John W. Denninger
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Karen Donelan
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Michelle L Dossett
- UC Davis Health, Department of Internal Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States of America
| | - Maurizio Fava
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Stacie Fredriksson
- Home Base Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Gregory Fricchione
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Nevita George
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Daniel L. Hall
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Betsy Remington Hart
- Home Base Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - John Herman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - April Hirschberg
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Daphne Holt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Sara E. Looby
- Yvonne L. Munn Center for Nursing Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Laura Malloy
- Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jocelyn Meek
- Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Darshan H. Mehta
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Home Base Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Rachel A. Millstein
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Helen Mizrach
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Katherine Rosa
- Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Ellen Slawsby
- Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - A. Clare Stupinski
- Home Base Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Lara Traeger
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Rachel Vanderkruik
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Christine Vogeli
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Sabine Wilhelm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Streck JM, Kalkhoran S, Bearnot B, Gupta PS, Kalagher KM, Regan S, Wakeman S, Rigotti NA. Perceived risk, attitudes, and behavior of cigarette smokers and nicotine vapers receiving buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 218:108438. [PMID: 33271434 PMCID: PMC7687365 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cigarette smoking may increase the risk of COVID-19 complications, reinforcing the urgency of smoking cessation in populations with high smoking prevalence such as individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Whether the COVID-19 pandemic has altered perceptions, motivation to quit, or tobacco use among cigarette smokers and nicotine e-cigarette vapers with OUD is unknown. METHODS A telephone survey was conducted in March-July 2020 of current cigarette smokers or nicotine vapers with OUD who were stable on buprenorphine treatment at five Boston (MA) area community health centers. The survey assessed respondents' perceived risk of COVID-19 due to smoking or vaping, interest in quitting, quit attempts and change in tobacco consumption during the pandemic. RESULTS 222/520 patients (43 %) completed the survey, and 145 were asked questions related to COVID-19. Of these, 61 % smoked cigarettes only, 13 % vaped nicotine only, and 26 % were dual users. Nearly 80 % of participants believed that smoking and vaping increased their risk of COVID-19 infection or complications. Smokers with this belief reported an increased interest in quitting (AOR 4.6, 95 % CI:1.7-12.4). Overall, 49 % of smokers and 42 % of vapers reported increased interest in quitting due to the pandemic; 24 % and 20 %, respectively, reported attempting to quit since the pandemic. However, 35 % of smokers and 27 % of vapers reported increasing smoking and vaping, respectively, during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with OUD believed that smoking and vaping increased their vulnerability to COVID-19, half reported increased interest in quitting, but others reported increasing smoking and vaping during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M. Streck
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Corresponding author at: Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1600, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Sara Kalkhoran
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Bearnot
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Priya S. Gupta
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelly M. Kalagher
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Wakeman
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy A. Rigotti
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Streck JM, Sigmon SC, Priest J, Bergeria CL, Davis DR, Hughes JR, Villanti AC, Tidey JW, Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Stitzer ML, Higgins ST. Investigating tobacco withdrawal in response to reduced nicotine cigarettes among smokers with opioid use disorder and other vulnerabilities. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2020; 28:714-723. [PMID: 32027158 PMCID: PMC7415473 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) have high prevalence of smoking and poor cessation outcomes. Data suggest that smokers with OUD may experience heightened nicotine reinforcement and more severe tobacco withdrawal compared to smokers without OUD. The Food and Drug Administration is currently considering reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes to reduce smoking prevalence and smoking-related disease. It is critical to understand the effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes (RNCCs) on tobacco withdrawal in this subgroup. In this secondary analysis, we investigated the ability of RNCCs to attenuate acute tobacco withdrawal and craving severity in smokers with OUD versus those without substance use disorders (SUDs). Smokers maintained on methadone or buprenorphine (opioid-maintained [OM]; n = 65) versus without other SUDs (i.e., non-SUD; n = 135) completed 5 laboratory sessions wherein they smoked their usual brand (UB) or a research cigarette varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, 15.8 mg/g of tobacco) under double-blind, acute abstinence conditions. Participants completed the Minnesota Tobacco Withdrawal Scale, including a desire to smoke (craving) item, before and every 15 min for 1 hr following smoking each cigarette. Tobacco withdrawal and craving did not differ significantly by OM status in response to UB or RNCCs. In addition to the Dose × Time interaction, greater depression and cigarette dependence consistently predicted withdrawal and craving (ps < .05). Across all cigarettes, tobacco withdrawal and craving did not significantly differ by OM status, suggesting that smokers receiving opioid agonist treatment may respond favorably to RNCCs. Additional studies with larger and more diverse samples are needed to address this question more definitively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
33
|
Piper ME, Bullen C, Krishnan-Sarin S, Rigotti NA, Steinberg ML, Streck JM, Joseph AM. Defining and Measuring Abstinence in Clinical Trials of Smoking Cessation Interventions: An Updated Review. Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22:1098-1106. [PMID: 31271211 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in tobacco products, use patterns, and assessment technology in the last 15 years led the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT) Treatment Research Network to call for an update to the 2003 SRNT recommendations for assessing abstinence in clinical trials of smoking cessation interventions. METHODS The SRNT Treatment Research Network convened a group of investigators with decades of experience in conducting tobacco treatment clinical trials. To arrive at the updated recommendations, the authors reviewed the recommendations of the prior SRNT Workgroup as well as current literature. Ten additional experts in the field provided feedback on this paper and these recommendations. RESULTS With respect to defining abstinence, the authors recommend: (1) continuing to use the definition of no use of combustible tobacco products (regardless of use of noncombustible tobacco products [e.g., snus] and alternative products [e.g., e-cigarettes]) and collecting additional data to permit alternate abstinence definitions; (2) no use of combustible or smokeless tobacco products; and (3) no use of combustible or smokeless tobacco products or alternative products, as appropriate for the research question being addressed. The authors also recommend reporting point prevalence and prolonged abstinence at multiple timepoints (end of treatment, ≥3 months after the end of treatment, and ≥6 months postquit or posttreatment initiation). CONCLUSIONS Defining abstinence requires specification of which products a user must abstain from using, the type of abstinence (i.e., point prevalence or continuous), and the duration of abstinence. These recommendations are intended to serve as guidelines for investigators as they collect the necessary data to accurately describe participants' abstinence during smoking cessation clinical trials. IMPLICATIONS This paper provides updated recommendations for defining abstinence in the context of smoking cessation treatment clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Piper
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention of Wisconsin, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Christopher Bullen
- National Institute for Health Innovation, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Marc L Steinberg
- Division of Addiction Psychiatry, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anne M Joseph
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nighbor TD, Barrows AJ, Bunn JY, DeSarno MJ, Oliver AC, Coleman SRM, Davis DR, Streck JM, Reed EN, Reed DD, Higgins ST. Comparing participant estimated demand intensity on the cigarette Purchase Task to consumption when usual-brand cigarettes were provided free. Prev Med 2020; 140:106221. [PMID: 32717262 PMCID: PMC7680356 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that the hypothetical Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT), especially its demand Intensity index (i.e., estimated cigarettes participants would smoke if free), is associated with individual differences in smoking risk. Nevertheless, few studies have examined the extent to which hypothetical CPT demand Intensity may differ from consumption when participants are provided with free cigarettes. That topic is the overarching focus of the present study. Participants were 745 adult smokers with co-morbid psychiatric conditions or socioeconomic disadvantage. CPT was administered for usual-brand cigarettes prior to providing participants with seven days of their usual-brand cigarettes free of cost and consumption was recorded daily via an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) System. Demand Intensity was correlated with IVR smoking rate (rs 0.670-0.696, ps < 0.001) but estimates consistently exceeded IVR smoking rates by an average of 4.4 cigarettes per day (ps < 0.001). Importantly, both measures were comparably sensitive to discerning well-established differences in smoking risk, including greater cigarettes per day among men versus women (F(1,732) = 18.74, p < 0.001), those with versus without opioid-dependence (F(1,732) = 168.37, p < 0.001), younger versus older adults (F(2,730) = 32.93, p < 0.001), and those with lower versus greater educational attainment (F(1,732) = 38.26, p < 0.001). Overall, CPT demand Intensity appears to overestimate consumption rates relative to those observed when participants are provided with free cigarettes, but those deviations are systematic (i.e., consistent in magnitude and direction, Fs all <1.63; ps > 0.19 for all interactions with subgroups). This suggests that demand Intensity was sensitive to established group differences in smoking rate, supporting its utility as an important measure of addiction potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler D Nighbor
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Anthony J Barrows
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Janice Y Bunn
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Michael J DeSarno
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Anthony C Oliver
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Sulamunn R M Coleman
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Danielle R Davis
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Ellaina N Reed
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Derek D Reed
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, United States of America
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America; Department of Psychology, University of Vermont, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Higgins ST, Tidey JW, Sigmon SC, Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Lee D, Hughes JR, Villanti AC, Bunn JY, Davis DR, Bergeria CL, Streck JM, Parker MA, Miller ME, DeSarno M, Priest JS, Cioe P, MacLeod D, Barrows A, Markesich C, Harfmann RF. Changes in Cigarette Consumption With Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes Among Smokers With Psychiatric Conditions or Socioeconomic Disadvantage: 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2019311. [PMID: 33079196 PMCID: PMC7576411 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE This study is part of a programmatic effort evaluating the effects of reducing nicotine content of cigarettes to minimally addictive levels. OBJECTIVE To examine whether very low-nicotine-content (VLNC) cigarettes decrease smoking rates and dependence severity among smokers with psychiatric disorders or socioeconomic disadvantage. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS These 3 randomized clinical trials were performed at the University of Vermont, Brown University, and Johns Hopkins University between October 2016 and September 2019. Participants received 12 weeks of exposure to study cigarettes with nicotine content ranging from levels representative of commercial cigarettes (15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco) to less than a hypothesized addiction threshold (2.4 mg/g and 0.4 mg/g). Daily smokers from 3 at-risk populations participated: individuals with affective disorders, exemplifying smokers with mental illness; individuals with opioid use disorder, exemplifying smokers with substance use disorders; and women with high school educations or less, exemplifying smokers with socioeconomic disadvantage. Data were analyzed from September 2019 to July 2020. INTERVENTIONS Random assignment to 1 of 3 study cigarettes provided weekly at no cost for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was between-group differences in mean total cigarettes smoked daily (CPD) during week 12; secondary outcomes included CPD for study and nonstudy cigarettes and dependence severity across weeks analyzed using analysis of covariance, random coefficients growth modeling, or repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS A total of 775 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 35.59 [11.05] years; 551 [71.10%] women [owing to 1 population being exclusively women]); participants smoked a mean (SD) of 17.79 (9.18) CPD at study intake. A total of 286 participants were randomized to 0.4 mg/g, 235 participants were randomized to 2.4 mg/g, and 254 participants were randomized to 15.8 mg/g. Participants randomized to VLNC cigarettes had decreased mean [SEM] total CPD during week 12 across populations (Cohen d = 0.61; P < .001). At week 12, mean (SEM) CPD decreased to 17.96 (0.98) CPD in the 0.4 mg/g group and to 19.53 (1.07) CPD in the 2.4 mg/g group, both of which were significantly different from the 15.8 mg/g group (25.08 [1.08] CPD at week 12) but not each other (0.4 mg/g adjusted mean difference: -7.54 [95%CI, -9.51 to -5.57]; 2.4 mg/g adjusted mean difference: -5.34 [95% CI, 7.41 to -3.26]). Several secondary outcomes differed across populations randomized to VLNCs, including mean total CPD across weeks, with linear trends lower in participants receiving 0.4 mg/g (-0.28 [95%CI, -0.39 to -0.18]; P < .001) and 2.4 mg/g (-0.13 [95%CI, -0.25 to -0.01]; P < .001) doses compared with those receiving the 15.8 mg/g dose (0.30 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.41]). Fagerström Test of Nicotine Dependence mean total scores were significantly lower in participants who received VLNCs (Cohen d = 0.12; P < .001), with those who received the 0.4 mg/g dose (mean [SD] score, 3.99 [0.06]; P < .001 vs 15.8 mg/g) or 2.4 mg/g dose (mean [SD] score, 4.07 [0.06]; P = .01 vs 15.8 mg/g) differing from those who received the 15.8 mg/g dose (mean [SD] score, 4.31 [0.06]) but not from each other. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings demonstrate that decreasing the nicotine content of cigarettes to very low levels reduced smoking rate and nicotine-dependence severity in these high-risk populations, effects that may facilitate successful cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02232737, NCT02250664, NCT02250534.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen T. Higgins
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Jennifer W. Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Stacey C. Sigmon
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Sarah H. Heil
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Diann E. Gaalema
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Dustin Lee
- Yale University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - John R. Hughes
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Andrea C. Villanti
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Janice Y. Bunn
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Danielle R. Davis
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
- Yale University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cecilia L. Bergeria
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Maria A. Parker
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
- School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington
| | - Mollie E. Miller
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Michael DeSarno
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Jeff S. Priest
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Patricia Cioe
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Douglas MacLeod
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Anthony Barrows
- UVM Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Streck JM, Weinberger AH, Pacek LR, Gbedemah M, Goodwin RD. Cigarette Smoking Quit Rates Among Persons With Serious Psychological Distress in the United States From 2008 to 2016: Are Mental Health Disparities in Cigarette Use Increasing? Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22:130-134. [PMID: 30351429 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior work suggests that the prevalence of cigarette smoking is persistently higher among people with mental health problems, relative to those without. Lower quit rates are one factor that could contribute to higher prevalence of smoking in this group. This study estimated trends in the cigarette quit rates among people with and without past-month serious psychological distress (SPD) from 2008 to 2016 in the United States. METHODS Data were drawn from 91 739 adult participants in the 2008-2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a repeated, cross-sectional, national survey. Linear time trends of cigarette quit rates, stratified by past-month SPD, were assessed using logistic regression models with continuous year as the predictor. RESULTS Cigarette quit rates among individuals with past-month SPD were lower than among those without SPD every year from 2008 to 2016. Quit rates did not change appreciably among those with past-month SPD (odds ratio = 1.02 [0.99, 1.06]) from 2008 to 2016, whereas quit rates increased among those without past-month SPD (odds ratio = 1.02 [1.01, 1.02]). CONCLUSIONS In the United States, quit rates among individuals with past-month SPD are approximately half than quit rates of those without SPD and have not increased over the past decade. This discrepancy in quit rates may be one factor driving increasing disparities in prevalence of smoking among those with versus without mental health problems. Tobacco control efforts require effective and targeted interventions for those with mental health problems. IMPLICATIONS Cigarette smoking quit rates have not increased among persons with serious mental health problems over the past decade. This work extends prior findings showing that smoking prevalence is not declining as quickly among persons with serious mental health problems. Findings suggest that diverging trends in quit rates are one possible driver of the persistent disparity in smoking by mental health status. Innovation in both tobacco control and targeted interventions for smokers with mental health problems is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychological Science, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.,Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Andrea H Weinberger
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY.,Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Yeshiva University Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Lauren R Pacek
- Division of Addictions, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Misato Gbedemah
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY.,Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY
| | - Renee D Goodwin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY.,Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Streck JM, Davis DR, Pang RD, Sigmon SC, Bunn JY, Bergeria CL, Tidey JW, Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Hughes JR, Stitzer ML, Reed E, Higgins ST. Potential Moderating Effects of Sex/Gender on the Acute Relative Reinforcing and Subjective Effects of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Vulnerable Populations. Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22:878-884. [PMID: 31225625 PMCID: PMC7395666 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reports in relatively healthy smokers suggest men are more sensitive than women to the subjective effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes (RNCCs). We know of no reports examining sex differences in the relative reinforcing effects of RNCCs, an important outcome in assessing smoking's addiction potential. The aim of the present study is to address this gap by examining sex/gender differences on reinforcing effects while examining whether sex differences in subjective effects are discernible in vulnerable populations. METHODS Secondary analysis of a within-subject, double-blinded experiment examining acute effects of cigarettes varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, 15.8 mg/g) among 169 adult smokers with psychiatric conditions or socioeconomic disadvantage. Effects of dose, sex, and their interaction were examined on reinforcing (concurrent-choice and Cigarette Purchase Task [CPT] testing), and subjective effects (Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire [CEQ] and craving/withdrawal ratings). RESULTS Reducing nicotine content decreased the relative reinforcing effects of smoking in concurrent-choice and CPT testing (p's < .05) with no significant effects of sex nor dose × sex/gender interactions. Reducing nicotine content decreased CEQ ratings with only a single significant effect of sex (higher Psychological Reward scores among women than men, p = .02) and no significant dose × sex/gender interactions. Results on craving/withdrawal paralleled those on the CEQ. CONCLUSIONS Reducing nicotine content decreases the addiction potential of smoking independent of sex in populations highly vulnerable to smoking and addiction, with no indication that women are less sensitive to subjective effects of RNCCs or would benefit less from a policy reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS A policy reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes has the potential to reduce the addiction potential of smoking across men and women who are especially vulnerable to smoking, addiction, and tobacco-related adverse health impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| | - Danielle R Davis
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| | - Raina D Pang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| | - Janice Y Bunn
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| | - Cecilia L Bergeria
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| | - John R Hughes
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| | - Maxine L Stitzer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ellaina Reed
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Davis DR, Parker MA, Villanti AC, Streck JM, Priest JS, Tidey JW, Gaalema DE, Sigmon SC, Heil SH, Higgins ST. Examining Age as a Potential Moderator of Response to Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Vulnerable Populations. Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 21:S49-S55. [PMID: 31867655 PMCID: PMC6939764 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Young adults (aged 18–24 years) have a higher smoking prevalence than younger and older age groups and young adulthood is an important developmental period during which long-term behavior patterns like cigarette smoking are established. The aim of the current study was to examine how young adult smokers with additional vulnerabilities to smoking respond to reduced nicotine content cigarettes. Methods This is a secondary analysis of a double-blind, within-subject experiment conducted with 169 cigarette smokers recruited from populations with comorbid psychiatric conditions or socioeconomic disadvantage assessing acute effects of research cigarettes varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, 15.8 mg/g). Participants were dichotomized by chronological age (18–24 vs. ≥25 years). Across 14 laboratory sessions effects of nicotine content were examined on measures of relative reinforcing efficacy (Cigarette Purchase Task [CPT] and Concurrent Choice testing), subjective effects, craving/withdrawal, and smoking topography. Repeated measures analysis of variances were used to examine potential moderating effects of age. Results Young adults exhibited lower demand for reduced nicotine content cigarettes than older adults across three of five CPT indices (ps < .05). No differences by age were observed on other measures of reinforcing efficacy, subjective effects, craving/withdrawal, or smoking topography where effects generally decreased as an orderly function of decreasing nicotine content (ps <.05). Conclusion Overall, these findings suggest that reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes would decrease the addiction potential of cigarette smoking in young adult smokers as much or perhaps more than older adult smokers from populations at increased vulnerability to smoking, addiction, and smoking-related health consequences. Implications Reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes to lower addiction potential of smoking has been proposed as a means to improve overall population health. It is imperative to examine how young adults may respond to a nicotine reduction policy. We saw minimal evidence that age moderates acute response and where there was evidence it was in the direction of reduced nicotine content cigarettes having less addictive potential among young versus older adults (eg, steeper decreases in demand for very low nicotine content cigarettes among young versus older adults). Overall, a nicotine reduction policy has the potential to reduce smoking across age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle R Davis
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
| | - Maria A Parker
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
| | - Andrea C Villanti
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA
| | - Jeff S Priest
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Davis DR, DeSarno MJ, Bergeria CL, Streck JM, Tidey JW, Sigmon SC, Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Stitzer ML, Higgins ST. Examining effects of unit price on preference for reduced nicotine content cigarettes and smoking rate. Prev Med 2019; 128:105823. [PMID: 31470023 PMCID: PMC6879848 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Revised: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Cigarette preference increases as a function of greater nicotine content, but manipulating cost can shift preference. The aims of the present study are to model whether (1) the behavioral-economic metric unit price (cost/reinforcer magnitude) accounts for preference shifts and (2) whether preference shifts toward reduced nicotine content are associated with smoking reductions. In a multisite study between 2015 and 2016, 169 daily smokers from vulnerable populations completed two concurrent-choice conditions examining preference for smoking normal (15.8 mg/g) and reduced (0.4 mg/g) nicotine content cigarettes. In Condition 1, both products were available at 10 responses/choice. In Condition 2, availability of the 0.4 mg/g dose remained at 10 responses/choice while the 15.8 mg/g dose was available on a progressive-ratio (PR) schedule wherein response cost increased following each choice. Unit prices were calculated by dividing dose by response requirement. Results were analyzed using ANOVA and binomial tests (p < .05). Participants preferred the 15.8 over 0.4 mg/g dose in Condition 1, but shifted preference to the 0.4 mg/g dose in Condition 2 (p < .001) immediately before the point in the PR progression where unit price for 15.8 dose exceeded unit price for the 0.4 dose (p < .001). This shift was associated with a reduction in smoking (p < .001). The unit price of nicotine appears to underpin cigarette product preference and may provide a metric for predicting preference and potentially impacting it through tobacco regulations. These results also demonstrate that reduced compared to normal nicotine content cigarettes sustain lower smoking rates discernible even under acute laboratory conditions and in vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael J DeSarno
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Department Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Cecilia L Bergeria
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Department Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Department Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Department Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Maxine L Stitzer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Department Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bergeria CL, Heil SH, Davis DR, Streck JM, Sigmon SC, Bunn JY, Tidey JW, Arger CA, Reed DD, Gallagher T, Hughes JR, Gaalema DE, Stitzer ML, Higgins ST. Evaluating the utility of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire and cigarette purchase task for predicting acute relative reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes varying in nicotine content. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 197:56-64. [PMID: 30776572 PMCID: PMC6440849 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nicotine is the addictive component in cigarettes that maintain cigarette smoking that subsequently leads to morbidity and mortality. Methods for assessing the abuse liability of cigarettes are essential to inform new tobacco product standards. This secondary analysis evaluated the utility of one subjective effects measure, the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ), and one behavioral economic task, the Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT), for predicting acute relative reinforcing efficacy measured by concurrent choice Self-Administration (SA). METHODS Smokers (N = 169) belonging to one of three vulnerable populations participated in a multi-site, double-blind study evaluating research cigarettes with varying levels of nicotine (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, 15.8 mg/g). Participants sampled cigarettes and completed the mCEQ and CPT. In subsequent sessions, cigarette preference was assessed using a concurrent choice SA procedure. Mixed-model repeated measures analysis of variance tests were used to evaluate the utility of the mCEQ subscales and CPT indices for predicting preference for the higher compared to lower nicotine content cigarettes. In addition, stepwise regressions were used to determine which subscales and indices independently predicted concurrent choice SA. RESULTS Greater increases on the Satisfaction and Enjoyment of Respiratory Tract Sensations mCEQ subscales independently predicted higher dose preference in concurrent choice testing. Elasticity was the only CPT index that predicted choice. However, its predictive utility differed by dose among opioid-maintained individuals. CONCLUSION The mCEQ and CPT predict behavioral measures of relative reinforcing efficacy as assessed in concurrent choice SA, with the mCEQ Satisfaction and Enjoyment of Respiratory Tract Sensations subscales being the strongest independent predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia L Bergeria
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
| | - Danielle R Davis
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Janice Y Bunn
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Chris A Arger
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Derek D Reed
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, Cofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Thomas Gallagher
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - John R Hughes
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Maxine L Stitzer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Higgins ST, Bergeria CL, Davis DR, Streck JM, Villanti AC, Hughes JR, Sigmon SC, Tidey JW, Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Stitzer ML, Priest JS, Skelly JM, Reed DD, Bunn JY, Tromblee MA, Arger CA, Miller ME. Response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes among smokers differing in tobacco dependence severity. Prev Med 2018; 117:15-23. [PMID: 29626557 PMCID: PMC6748869 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This study examines whether tobacco dependence severity moderates the acute effects of reducing nicotine content in cigarettes on the addiction potential of smoking, craving/withdrawal, or smoking topography. Participants (N = 169) were daily smokers with mild, moderate, or high tobacco-dependence severity using the Heaviness of Smoking Index. Following brief abstinence, participants smoked research cigarettes varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, 15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco) in a within-subject design. Results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of co-variance. No main effects of dependence severity or interactions with nicotine dose were noted in relative reinforcing effects in concurrent choice testing or subjective effects on the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire. Demand for smoking in the Cigarette Purchase Task was greater among more dependent smokers, but reducing nicotine content decreased demand independent of dependence severity. Dependence severity did not significantly alter response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes on the Minnesota Tobacco Withdrawal Scale nor Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-brief (QSU) Factor-2 scale; dependence severity and dose interacted significantly on the QSU-brief Factor-1 scale, with reductions dependent on dose among highly but not mildly or moderately dependent smokers. Dependence severity and dose interacted significantly on only one of six measures of smoking topography (i.e., maximum flow rate), which increased as dose increased among mildly and moderately but not highly dependent smokers. These results suggest that dependence severity has no moderating influence on the ability of reduced nicotine content cigarettes to lower the addiction potential of smoking, and minimal effects on relief from craving/withdrawal or smoking topography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
| | - Cecilia L Bergeria
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Danielle R Davis
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Andrea C Villanti
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - John R Hughes
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Maxine L Stitzer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jeff S Priest
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Joan M Skelly
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Derek D Reed
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States
| | - Janice Y Bunn
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Morgan A Tromblee
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Christopher A Arger
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Mollie E Miller
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Streck JM, Chang Y, Tindle HA, Regan S, Park ER, Levy DE, Singer DE, Ylioja T, Rigotti NA. Smoking Cessation After Hospital Discharge: Factors Associated With Abstinence. J Hosp Med 2018; 13:774-778. [PMID: 30156578 PMCID: PMC6465961 DOI: 10.12788/jhm.2997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Hospitalization offers tobacco smokers an opportunity to quit smoking, but factors associated with abstinence from tobacco after hospital discharge are poorly understood. We analyzed data from a multisite, randomized controlled trial testin a smoking cessation intervention for 1,357 hospitalized cigaretts smokers who planned to quit. Using multiple logistic regression, we assessed factors identifiable in the hospital that were independently associated with biochemically confirmed tobacco abstinence 6 months after discharge. Biochemically confirmed abstinence at 6 months (n = 218, 16%) was associated with a smoking-related primary discharge diagnosis (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.41-2.77), greater confidence in the ability to quit smoking (AOR - 1.31, 95% CI: 1.07-1.60), and stronger intention to quit (plan to quit after discharge vs. try to quit; AOR = 1.68, CI: 1.19-2.38). In conclusion, smokers hospitalized with a tobacco-related illness and those with greater confidence and intention to quit after discharge are more likely to sustain abstinence in the long term. Hospital clinicians' efforts to promote smoking cessation should target smokers' confidence and motivation to quit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hilary A Tindle
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elyse R Park
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas E Levy
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel E Singer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas Ylioja
- School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Streck JM, Bergeria CL, Parker MA, Davis DR, DeSarno M, Sigmon SC, Hughes JR, Gaalema DE, Heil SH, Tidey JW, Stitzer ML, Rothman M, Higgins ST. Response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes among smokers with chronic health conditions. Prev Med Rep 2018; 12:321-329. [PMID: 30416951 PMCID: PMC6224320 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Revised: 09/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals with chronic health conditions persist in smoking despite the presence of smoking-related illness. The aim of this study was to examine whether chronic health conditions moderate response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, 15.8 mg/g of tobacco). This is a secondary analysis of a controlled clinical laboratory study that examined the acute effects of cigarettes varying in nicotine content among individuals especially vulnerable to smoking and tobacco dependence. Participants in the present study were categorized as having 0, 1–2, or ≥3 smoking-related chronic health conditions (i.e., chronic condition severity, CCS). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine whether CCS moderated response to cigarettes across measures of addiction potential (i.e., concurrent choice testing between nicotine dose pairs, Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT) performance, positive subjective effects), tobacco withdrawal, cigarette craving, and smoking topography. No main effects of CCS or interactions of CCS and nicotine dose were observed for concurrent choice testing, positive subjective effects, tobacco withdrawal, or smoking topography. Main effects of CCS were noted on the CPT with greater CCS being associated with less persistent demand. There was an interaction of CCS and nicotine dose on Factor 1 of the Questionnaire on Smoking Urges with the effects of dose significant only among those with 1–2 chronic conditions. Overall, we see minimal evidence that chronic condition severity affects response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes. A policy that reduces the nicotine content of cigarettes to minimally addictive levels may benefit smokers already experiencing smoking-related chronic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Cecilia L Bergeria
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Maria A Parker
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Danielle R Davis
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Michael DeSarno
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Stacey C Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - John R Hughes
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Jennifer W Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Maxine L Stitzer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Matthew Rothman
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Weinberger AH, Streck JM, Pacek LR, Goodwin RD. Nondaily Cigarette Smoking Is Increasing Among People With Common Mental Health and Substance Use Problems in the United States: Data From Representative Samples of US Adults, 2005-2014. J Clin Psychiatry 2018; 79:17m11945. [PMID: 30153404 PMCID: PMC6377560 DOI: 10.4088/jcp.17m11945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study estimated trends in the prevalence of daily and nondaily cigarette smoking among United States adults with any common mental health or substance use problem (MHSUP), compared to US adults without MHSUP, from 2005 to 2014. METHODS Data were drawn from the years 2005 to 2014 from the public use data files for the annually conducted National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Linear time trends of current, daily, and nondaily cigarette smoking among adults (age 18 years and older) with and without MHSUP were assessed using logistic regression models with continuous year as the predictor. RESULTS In 2014, the prevalence of current cigarette smoking among those with MHSUP was more than twice that of those without MHSUP. Nondaily cigarette smoking increased significantly from 2005 to 2014 among those with MHSUP (P = .001) in contrast to a decline in nondaily cigarette smoking among those without MHSUP (P < .01). The rate of change differed significantly (P < .001). Daily cigarette smoking declined significantly from 2005 to 2014 among those with and without MHSUP (P values < .001). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of nondaily cigarette smoking is increasing among US adults with common mental health and substance use problems, while it continues to decline among those without these vulnerabilities. The disparity in prevalence of daily cigarette smoking between those with and without MHSUP remains substantial. Conclusions about how to reach the tobacco endgame may need to be reconsidered to develop targeted tobacco control public health approaches that address common MHSUP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea H. Weinberger
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York,Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- Department of Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington Vermont
| | - Lauren R. Pacek
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Renee D. Goodwin
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, New York,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York,Corresponding author: Renee D. Goodwin, PhD, MPH, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, 55 West 125th St, Rm 611, New York, NY 10027 ()
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and mood disorders among individuals with opioid use disorder far exceeds that of the general population. While psychiatric symptoms often improve upon entry into opioid treatment, this has typically been seen with treatments involving psychosocial counseling. In this secondary analysis, we examined changes in psychiatric symptoms during a randomized clinical trial evaluating an interim buprenorphine treatment without counseling among individuals awaiting entry into comprehensive treatment. Waitlisted adults with opioid use disorder (N = 50) were randomized to one of two 12-week conditions: interim buprenorphine treatment (IBT; n = 25) consisting of buprenorphine maintenance using a computerized medication dispenser, with bimonthly clinic visits and technology-assisted monitoring, or waitlist control (WLC; n = 25), wherein participants remained on the waitlist of their local clinic. All participants completed assessments of psychiatric symptoms at intake and Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12. We examined changes on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and Psychiatric subscale of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Significant group-by-time interactions were observed for all measures of psychiatric severity examined: BAI (p < .05), BDI-II (p < .01), 5 BSI subscales (ps < .05), and the ASI Psychiatric subscale (p < .05). On all measures, IBT participants reported significantly reduced psychiatric severity at the 4-, 8-, and 12-week assessments relative to baseline. In contrast, there were no significant changes in psychiatric symptoms among WLC participants. IBT without counseling may improve psychiatric distress among waitlisted individuals with opioid use disorder. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M. Streck
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Taylor A. Ochalek
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Gary J. Badger
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Stacey C. Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Prevalence of cigarette smoking among opioid-dependent individuals is 6-fold that of the general U.S. adult population and their quit rates are notoriously poor. One possible reason for the modest cessation outcomes in opioid-dependent smokers may be that they experience more severe tobacco withdrawal upon quitting. In this secondary analysis, we evaluated tobacco withdrawal in opioid-dependent (OD) smokers versus smokers without co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs). Participants were 47 methadone- or buprenorphine-maintained smokers and 25 non-SUD smokers who completed 1 of several 2-week studies involving daily visits for biochemical monitoring, delivery of financial incentives contingent on smoking abstinence, and assessment of withdrawal via the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS). Prior to quitting smoking, OD smokers presented with higher baseline withdrawal scores than non-SUD smokers (1.7 ± 0.2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively; F[1, 63] = 7.31, p < .001). Withdrawal scores in both groups decreased over the subsequent 2-week period with no group differences, F(1, 910) = 0.50, p = .48. A similar pattern was observed on craving (i.e., Desire to Smoke item of MNWS), although the trajectory of decrease over time on this item was also moderated by gender. Overall, there was no difference in withdrawal during biochemically verified smoking abstinence between OD and non-SUD smokers, suggesting that elevated withdrawal severity following quitting may not be a major factor contributing to the poor cessation outcomes consistently observed among OD smokers. Further scientific efforts are needed to improve our understanding of the high smoking rates and modest cessation outcomes in this challenging population. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M. Streck
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
| | - Sarah H. Heil
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
| | - Stephen T. Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
| | | | - Stacey C. Sigmon
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Higgins ST, Heil SH, Sigmon SC, Tidey JW, Gaalema DE, Hughes JR, Stitzer ML, Durand H, Bunn JY, Priest JS, Arger CA, Miller ME, Bergeria CL, Davis DR, Streck JM, Reed DD, Skelly JM, Tursi L. Addiction Potential of Cigarettes With Reduced Nicotine Content in Populations With Psychiatric Disorders and Other Vulnerabilities to Tobacco Addiction. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74:1056-1064. [PMID: 28832876 PMCID: PMC5710465 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A national policy is under consideration to reduce the nicotine content of cigarettes to lower nicotine addiction potential in the United States. OBJECTIVE To examine how smokers with psychiatric disorders and other vulnerabilities to tobacco addiction respond to cigarettes with reduced nicotine content. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A multisite, double-blind, within-participant assessment of acute response to research cigarettes with nicotine content ranging from levels below a hypothesized addiction threshold to those representative of commercial cigarettes (0.4, 2.3, 5.2, and 15.8 mg/g of tobacco) at 3 academic sites included 169 daily smokers from the following 3 vulnerable populations: individuals with affective disorders (n = 56) or opioid dependence (n = 60) and socioeconomically disadvantaged women (n = 53). Data were collected from March 23, 2015, through April 25, 2016. INTERVENTIONS After a brief smoking abstinence, participants were exposed to the cigarettes with varying nicotine doses across fourteen 2- to 4-hour outpatient sessions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Addiction potential of the cigarettes was assessed using concurrent choice testing, the Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT), and validated measures of subjective effects, such as the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale. RESULTS Among the 169 daily smokers included in the analysis (120 women [71.0%] and 49 men [29.0%]; mean [SD] age, 35.6 [11.4] years), reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes decreased the relative reinforcing effects of smoking in all 3 populations. Across populations, the 0.4-mg/g dose was chosen significantly less than the 15.8-mg/g dose in concurrent choice testing (mean [SEM] 30% [0.04%] vs 70% [0.04%]; Cohen d = 0.40; P < .001) and generated lower demand in the CPT (α = .027 [95% CI, 0.023-0.031] vs α = .019 [95% CI, 0.016-0.022]; Cohen d = 1.17; P < .001). Preference for higher over lower nicotine content cigarettes could be reversed by increasing the response cost necessary to obtain the higher dose (mean [SEM], 61% [0.02%] vs 39% [0.02%]; Cohen d = 0.40; P < .001). All doses reduced Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale total scores (range of mean decreases, 0.10-0.50; Cohen d range, 0.21-1.05; P < .001 for all), although duration of withdrawal symptoms was greater at higher doses (η2 = 0.008; dose-by-time interaction, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes may decrease their addiction potential in populations that are highly vulnerable to tobacco addiction. Smokers with psychiatric conditions and socioeconomic disadvantage are more addicted and less likely to quit and experience greater adverse health impacts. Policies to reduce these disparities are needed; reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes should be a policy focus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen T. Higgins
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Sarah H. Heil
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Stacey C. Sigmon
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Jennifer W. Tidey
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Diann E. Gaalema
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - John R. Hughes
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Maxine L. Stitzer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hanna Durand
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Janice Y. Bunn
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Jeff S. Priest
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Christopher A. Arger
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Mollie E. Miller
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Cecilia L. Bergeria
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Danielle R. Davis
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Joanna M. Streck
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Derek D. Reed
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence
| | - Joan M. Skelly
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| | - Lauren Tursi
- University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Burlington
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Streck JM, Regan S, Chang Y, Kelley JHK, Singer DE, Rigotti NA. Examining the effects of illicit drug use on tobacco cessation outcomes in the Helping HAND 2 randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 178:586-592. [PMID: 28739101 PMCID: PMC5555373 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2017] [Revised: 05/25/2017] [Accepted: 06/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) smoke at higher rates and have higher tobacco-related mortality than the general population. Despite having an interest in smoking cessation, smokers with SUDs may have greater difficulty quitting. METHODS Analysis of data from a RCT testing a post-discharge smoking cessation intervention for hospitalized cigarette smokers interested in quitting. Past 7day tobacco abstinence was self-reported at 1, 3, and 6 months and biochemically confirmed at 6 months post-discharge. Other drug use was assessed at baseline by self-report or a past-year discharge diagnosis of SUD. Multiple logistic regression compared tobacco cessation outcomes among participants with no recreational drug use (NDU; n=942) vs. marijuana only (MU; n=284) vs. other illicit drugs (IDU; n=131). RESULTS Groups differed at baseline on age, gender, race, education, other household smokers, alcohol use, and anxiety/depression (all p<0.05). Confirmed 6-month tobacco abstinence was lower among IDU than NDU participants (9% vs 18%, p=0.01; AOR=0.43, CI: 0.22-0.84) after adjustment for study arm, smoking characteristics, demographics, quality of life, alcohol use and MU. Confirmed 6-month abstinence did not differ significantly between MU vs. NDU participants (14% vs 18%, p>0.05; AOR=0.77, CI:0.51-1.14). Counseling and medication use did not differ significantly among groups at any follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Hospitalized smokers who planned to stop smoking after discharge and used cessation assistance were less successful if they had used illicit drugs in the past year, but not if they had only used marijuana. More intensive or tailored interventions may be required to address smoking in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M. Streck
- Department of Psychological Science, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington VT, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer H. K. Kelley
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel E. Singer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy A. Rigotti
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Higgins ST, Heil SH, Sigmon SC, Tidey JW, Gaalema DE, Stitzer ML, Durand H, Bunn JY, Priest JS, Arger CA, Miller ME, Bergeria CL, Davis DR, Streck JM, Zvorsky I, Redner R, Vandrey R, Pacek LR. Response to varying the nicotine content of cigarettes in vulnerable populations: an initial experimental examination of acute effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2017; 234:89-98. [PMID: 27714427 PMCID: PMC5203959 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4438-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 09/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE The purpose of this study was to begin researching the effects of very low nicotine content cigarettes in smokers especially vulnerable to dependence to assess their potential as a less dependence-producing alternative to current commercial cigarettes. METHODS Participants were 26 adult, daily cigarette smokers from one of three populations: economically disadvantaged women of reproductive age (n = 9), opioid-dependent individuals (n = 11), and individuals with affective disorders (n = 6). Participants completed fourteen 2-4-h experimental sessions in a within-subjects research design. Sessions were conducted following brief smoking abstinence. Four research cigarettes varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, and 15.8 mg/g) were studied under double-blind conditions, assessing smoking topography, subjective effects, and relative reinforcing effects of varying doses in concurrent choice tests. Results were collapsed across vulnerable populations and analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS No significant differences between doses were discernible in smoking topography. All doses were equi-effective at reducing nicotine withdrawal. Ratings of satisfaction from smoking were lower at the 0.4 compared to 15.8 mg/g dose. Participants preferred the 15.8 mg/g dose over the 0.4 and 2.4 but not the 5.2 mg/g doses in concurrent choice testing; no differences between the two lowest doses were noted. CONCLUSIONS All cigarettes effectively reduced nicotine withdrawal with no differences in smoking topography, suggesting minimal compensatory smoking. Dependence potential was lowest at the 0.4 mg/g dose. These initial results are promising regarding the feasibility of lowering nicotine content in cigarettes to very low levels in vulnerable populations without untoward effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah H. Heil
- University of Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science
| | | | | | | | | | - Hanna Durand
- University of Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science
| | - Janice Y. Bunn
- University of Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science
| | - Jeff S. Priest
- University of Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ivori Zvorsky
- University of Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science
| | - Ryan Redner
- University of Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science,Southern Illinois University
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Luberto CM, Hyland KA, Streck JM, Temel B, Park ER. Stigmatic and Sympathetic Attitudes Toward Cancer Patients Who Smoke: A Qualitative Analysis of an Online Discussion Board Forum. Nicotine Tob Res 2016; 18:2194-2201. [PMID: 27613953 PMCID: PMC5103935 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A significant minority of patients continue to smoke after a cancer diagnosis. Cancer patients who smoke experience stigma that can negatively impact health outcomes. We explored publicly shared perspectives about cancer patients who continued to smoke post-diagnosis. METHODS An online news article, published in January 2012, summarized the findings of smoking prevalence among patients with lung cancer and colorectal cancer enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium trial. In response, written comments were posted on the articles' public discussion board. Applying principles of grounded theory, we conducted a document analysis and established a conceptual framework to develop a model by which to explain factors underlying stigmatic and sympathetic attitudes toward cancer survivors who continue to smoke. RESULTS Personal experiences with cancer, smoking, and statistical literacy were found to influence beliefs about cancer and smoking, which in turn influenced stigmatic or sympathetic attitudes. More sympathetic attitudes were expressed by individuals who had personal experiences with smoking, believed cancer is multicausal, identified smoking as an addiction, or considered extrinsic factors responsible for smoking. Individuals who did not have personal experiences with cancer or smoking, had low statistical literacy, believed that smoking necessarily and directly causes cancer, and focused on intrinsic responsibilities for smoking tended to express more stigmatic attitudes. CONCLUSIONS The current findings raise awareness and provide insight into stigma against cancer survivors who smoke and can help inform strategies for reducing stigma against this vulnerable group. IMPLICATIONS This study helps raise awareness of stigma toward cancer patients who smoke and provides insight into the processes that may influence stigmatic as compared to sympathetic attitudes toward these patients. Results suggest that population-based strategies to educate the public regarding the nature of nicotine addiction, difficulty of quitting, and benefits of quitting for cancer patients may be useful for reducing stigma against cancer patients with a smoking history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Luberto
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA;
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kelly A Hyland
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Brandon Temel
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|