Biomechanical comparison of headless compression screws versus independent locking screw for intra-articular fractures

PURPOSE

Headless compression screws (HCS) have a variable thread pitch and headless design enabling them to embed below the articular surface and generate compression force for fracture healing without restricting movement. Locking screws have greater variety of dimensions and a threaded pitch mirroring the design of the HCS. The objective of this study is to determine whether locking screws can generate compression force and compare the compressive forces generated by HCS versus locking screws.

METHOD

A comparison between 3.5-mm HCS versus 3.5-mm locking screws and 2.8-mm HCS versus 2.7-mm locking screws was performed using a synthetic foam bone model (Synbone) and FlexiForce sensors to record the compression forces (N). The mean peak compression force was calculated from a sample of 3 screws for each screw type. Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way ANOVA test and statistical significance was determined to be p =  < 0.05.

RESULTS

The 3.5-mm Synthes and Smith and Nephew locking screws generated similar peak compression forces to the 3.5-mm Acutrak 2 headless compression screws with no statistically significant difference between them. The smaller 2.7-mm Synthes and Smith and Nephew locking screws initially generated similar compressive forces up to 1.5 and 2 revolutions, respectively, but their peak compression force was less compared to the 2.8-mm Micro Acutrak 2 HCS.

CONCLUSION

Locking screws are able to generate compressive forces and may be a viable alternative to headless compressive screws supporting their use for intra-articular fractures.

Reliability of the CURL classification for proximal ulna fracture-dislocations of the elbow

Background

Proximal ulna fracture-dislocations are challenging injuries with a myriad of existing classification systems. The Coronoid, proximal Ulna, Radius, and Ligaments classification (CURL) is a simple framework designed to focus attention on the key components affecting outcome and guide surgical management. This study evaluates interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this new classification.

Methods

Four observers independently reviewed plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with proximal ulna fracture-dislocations. Each observer scored the Coronoid (C), proximal Ulna (U), and Radius (R) components for each fracture on 2 occasions. The osseous components were subclassified as 'intact', 'simple', or 'complex'. The Ligament component (L) was not rated as this requires intraoperative classification. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated using Cohen's weighted kappa coefficients. X-ray and CT were compared for patients with both imaging modalities. The Landis and Koch criteria were used to interpret the strength of the kappa statistics.

Results

One hundred seventy seven patients had plain X-rays; 58 patients had both X-ray and CT scans. Overall, in the X-ray only cohort, there was 'almost perfect' interobserver reliability for the radial head (k = 0.94) and coronoid (k = 0.83), and 'substantial' reliability (k = 0.68) for the proximal ulna. For the X-ray and CT cohort, interobserver reliability was 'almost perfect' across both modalities for the radial head (k = 0.88 and k = 0.93, respectively) and 'moderate' for the proximal ulna (k = 0.48 and k = 0.52, respectively). For the coronoid, interobserver reliability for X-ray interpretation was 'substantial' (k = 0.74) and for CT was 'almost perfect' (k = 0.89). Intraobserver reliability was 'almost perfect' for all components, other than CT assessment of the proximal ulna which demonstrated 'substantial' reliability (k = 0.74).

Conclusion

The Coronoid, proximal Ulna, Radius, and Ligaments classification demonstrates strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, supporting use of the classification for proximal ulna fracture-dislocations. CT is recommended for improved characterization of any fracture with a coronoid component.

Acute and chronic coronoid reconstruction using the olecranon Tip

Post-traumatic coronoid deficiency in the elbow can lead to chronic pain, instability and arthritis. A variety of osteochondral grafts have been used to reconstruct the coronoid, and restore elbow stability. The radial head and iliac crest grafts are the most common in the literature but have limitations. The olecranon tip is a promising alternative, with both cadaveric and computer models demonstrating superior congruency, without compromising elbow stability or disrupting the extensor mechanism. We present a small, case series demonstrating the technique for contralateral and ipsilateral grafts in both the acute and chronic setting.

Sensitivity and specificity of the posterolateral rotatory drawer test in the diagnosis of lateral collateral ligament insufficiency of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Numerous clinical tests are described for the diagnosis of chronic lateral collateral ligament (LCL) insufficiency of the elbow; however, none of these tests have been adequately assessed for sensitivity, with at most 8 patients included in previous studies. Furthermore, no test has had specificity assessed. The posterolateral rotatory drawer (PLRD) test is thought to have improved diagnostic accuracy over other tests in the awake patient. The aim of this study is to formally assess this test using reference standards in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

A total of 106 eligible patients were identified for inclusion from a single-surgeon database of operative procedures. Examination under anesthetic (EUA) and arthroscopy were chosen as the reference standards to compare the PLRD test against. Only patients with a clearly documented PLRD test finding performed preoperatively in the clinic, and a clearly documented EUA and/or arthroscopic findings from surgery were included. A total of 102 patients underwent EUA, 74 of whom also underwent arthroscopy. Twenty-eight patients had EUA, and then an open procedure without arthroscopy. Four patients had arthroscopy without a clearly documented EUA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients had a positive PLRD test, and 69 had a negative test. Compared to the reference standard of EUA (n = 102), the PLRD test had a sensitivity of 97.3% (85.8%-99.9%) and a specificity of 98.5% (91.7%-100%) (PPV = 0.973, NPV = 0.985). Compared to the reference standard of arthroscopy (n = 78), the PLRD test had a sensitivity of 87.5% (61.7%-98.5%) and a specificity of 98.4% (91.3%-100%) (PPV = 0.933, NPV = 0.968). Compared to either reference standard (n = 106), the PLRD test has a sensitivity of 94.7% (82.3%-99.4%) and a specificity of 98.5% (92.1%-100%) (PPV = 0.973, NPV = 0.971).

CONCLUSION

The PLRD test demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 98.5% with high positive and negative predictive values. This test is recommended as the primary diagnostic tool for LCL insufficiency in the awake patient and should be widely incorporated into surgical training.

Strain reduction screws for nonunions following fixation around the elbow - A case series and review of the literature

Background

Nonunions following fracture fixation result in significant patient morbidity and financial burden. Traditional operative management around the elbow consists of removal of metalwork, debridement of the nonunion and re-fixation with compression, often with bone grafting. Recently, some authors in the lower limb literature have described a minimally invasive technique used for select nonunions where simply placing screws across the nonunion facilitates healing by reducing inter-fragmentary strain. To our knowledge, this has not been described around the elbow, where traditional more invasive techniques continue to be employed.

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe the application of strain reduction screws for management of select nonunions around the elbow.

Methods & Results

We describe 4 cases (two humeral shaft, one distal humerus and one proximal ulna) of established nonunion following previous internal fixation, where minimally invasive placement of strain reduction screws were used. In all cases, no existing metal work was removed, the nonunion site was not opened, and no bone grafting or biologic stimulation was used. Surgery was performed between 9 and 24 months after the original fixation. 2.7 mm or 3.5 standard cortical screws were placed across the nonunion without lagging. Three fractures went on to unite with no further intervention required. One fracture required revision fixation using traditional techniques. Failure of the technique in this case did not adversely affect the subsequent revision procedure and has allowed refinement of the indications.

Conclusion

Strain reduction screws are safe, simple and effective technique to treat select nonunions around the elbow. This technique has potential to be a paradigm shift in the management of these highly complex cases and is the first description in the upper limb to our knowledge.

Hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction internal fixation for intra-articular distal humerus fractures in older patients

Background

Intra-articular distal humerus fractures in the older population remain a challenge to fix, due to the comminution of fragments and poor bone stock. Recently Elbow Hemiarthroplasty (EHA) has gained popularity to treat these fractures, however no studies exist comparing EHA to Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF).

Objectives

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients over the age of 60 years treated with ORIF or EHA for multi-fragmentary distal humerus fractures.

Methods

Thirty-six patients (mean age 73 years) treated surgically for a multi-fragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fracture were followed up for a mean duration of thirty-four months (12-73 months). Eighteen patients were treated with ORIF and eighteen with EHA. The groups were matched for fracture type, demographic characteristics and follow up time. Outcome measures collected included Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Visual Analogue pain Score (VAS), range of motion (ROM), complications, re-operations and radiographic outcomes. The quality of ORIF was judged against set radiographic criteria in order to understand the effect of sub-optimal ORIF technique.

Results

No significant clinical difference was found between EHA and ORIF in mean OES (42.5 vs 39.6, p = 0.28), mean VAS (0.5 vs 1.7, p = 0.08) or mean flexion-extension arc (123° vs 112°, p = 0.12). There were significantly more complications associated with ORIF compared to EHA (39% vs 6%, p = 0.04). ORIF executed with satisfactory fixation technique had a comparable complication rate compared to EHA (17% vs 6%, p = 0.6). Two ORIF patients required revision to Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA). None of the EHA patients required revision surgery.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated similar short-term functional outcomes between EHA and ORIF for the treatment of multi-fragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fractures in patients >60 years of age. Early complications and re-operations were higher in the ORIF group, although this could be related to improper ORIF technique and patient selection.

Elbow arthroplasty in trauma-current concepts review

Introduction

Despite advancements in modern locking plate technology, distal humerus fractures in the elderly remain difficult to treat. A subset of fractures in this osteoporotic bone includes multiple, shallow articular fragments that renders fixation unreliable, precluding early motion and acceptable functional outcomes. Arthroplasty, in the form of either Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) or Distal Humeral Hemiarthroplasty (DHH) are alternative treatment options in this cohort and are being increasingly used.

Methods

This article reviews the use of TEA or DHH for acute distal humerus fracture, including patient selection, pre-operative planning, surgical approach, implant positioning, rehabilitation, outcomes and complications.

Results

Arthroplasties are being increasingly used for acute distal humerus fractures, however they introduce potential complications not seen with fixation. Due care must be employed to correct implant positioning which is a function of implant rotation, implant length and implant sizing. We describe a robust technique for epicondyle repair in DHH and unlinked TEA to avoid instability. Outcomes of DHH and TEA for acute distal humerus fracture are encouraging, however further long-term outcome and comparative data regarding arthroplasty is required.

Conclusions

Short to medium term outcomes demonstrate that both DHH and TEA are valuable options for selected patients, although attention to technique is required to minimise potential complications.

Elbow conditions: research priorities setting in partnership with the James Lind Alliance

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a UK-based James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership for elbow conditions and be representative of the views of patients, carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

SETTING

This was a national collaborative study organised through the British Elbow and Shoulder Society.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients, carers and HCPs who have managed or experienced elbow conditions, their carers and HCPs in the UK involved in managing of elbow conditions.

METHODS

The rigorous JLA priority setting methodology was followed. Electronic and paper scoping surveys were distributed to identify potential research priority questions (RPQs). Initial responses were reviewed and a literature search was performed to cross-check categorised questions. Those questions already sufficiently answered were excluded and the remaining questions were ranked in a second survey according to priority for future elbow conditions research. Using the JLA methodology, responses from HCP and patients were combined to create a list of the top 18 questions. These were further reviewed in a dedicated multistakeholder workshop where the top 10 RPQs were agreed by consensus.

RESULTS

The process was completed over 24 months. The initial survey resulted in 467 questions from 165 respondents (73% HCPs and 27% patients/carers). These questions were reviewed and combined into 46 summary topics comprising: tendinopathy, distal biceps pathology, arthritis, stiffness, trauma, arthroplasty and cubital tunnel syndrome. The second (interim prioritisation) survey had 250 respondents (72% HCP and 28% patients/carers). The top 18 ranked questions from this survey were taken to the final workshop where a consensus was reached on the top 10 RPQs.

CONCLUSIONS

The top 10 RPQs highlight areas of importance that currently lack sufficient evidence to guide diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of elbow conditions. This collaborative process will guide researchers and funders regarding the topics that should receive most future attention and benefit patients and HCPs.

Challenging the mechanism of distal biceps tendon rupture using a video analysis study

AIMS

The conventionally described mechanism of distal biceps tendon rupture (DBTR) is of a 'considerable extension force suddenly applied to a resisting, actively flexed forearm'. This has been commonly paraphrased as an 'eccentric contracture to a flexed elbow'. Both definitions have been frequently used in the literature with little objective analysis or citation. The aim of the present study was to use video footage of real time distal biceps ruptures to revisit and objectively define the mechanism of injury.

METHODS

An online search identified 61 videos reporting a DBTR. Videos were independently reviewed by three surgeons to assess forearm rotation, elbow flexion, shoulder position, and type of muscle contraction being exerted at the time of rupture. Prospective data on mechanism of injury and arm position was also collected concurrently for 22 consecutive patients diagnosed with an acute DBTR in order to corroborate the video analysis.

RESULTS

Four videos were excluded, leaving 57 for final analysis. Mechanisms of injury included deadlift, bicep curls, calisthenics, arm wrestling, heavy lifting, and boxing. In all, 98% of ruptures occurred with the arm in supination and 89% occurred at 0° to 10° of elbow flexion. Regarding muscle activity, 88% occurred during isometric contraction, 7% during eccentric contraction, and 5% during concentric contraction. Interobserver correlation scores were calculated as 0.66 to 0.89 using the free-marginal Fleiss Kappa tool. The prospectively collected patient data was consistent with the video analysis, with 82% of injuries occurring in supination and 95% in relative elbow extension.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the classically described injury mechanism, in this study the usual arm position during DBTR was forearm supination and elbow extension, and the muscle contraction was typically isometric. This was demonstrated for both video analysis and 'real' patients across a range of activities leading to rupture.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):826-831.

Treatment of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures - A survey of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society surgical membership

Background

Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures result in weakness and deformity. While in other jurisdictions the rate of surgical repair has outpaced rises in incidence, UK practice for distal biceps tendon ruptures is unknown. The aim of this survey was to characterise current UK clinical practice.

Methods

An online survey was sent to the surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Questions covered respondent demographics, clinical decision making, surgical experience and willingness to be involved in future research.

Results

A total of 242 surgeons responded; 99% undertook acute distal biceps tendon repairs with 83% repairing at least half of all distal biceps tendon ruptures, and 84% of surgeons would have their own, hypothetical, acute distal biceps tendon rupture repaired in their dominant arm and 67% for their non-dominant arm. Patient age, occupation and restoration of strength were the commonest factors underpinning a recommendation of surgical fixation. Most surgeons (87%) supported a national trial to study operative and non-operative treatments.

Conclusions

UK upper limb surgeons currently advise surgical repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures for the majority of their patients. This is despite a paucity of evidence to support improved outcomes following surgical, rather than non-operative, management. There is a clear need for robust clinical evaluation in this area.

Few UK vascular centres offer a fully NICE-compliant supervised exercise programme: a national audit

INTRODUCTION

To determine the current (pre-COVID-19) provision of supervised exercise training (SET) for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in UK Vascular Centres.

METHODS

Hospital Trusts delivering vascular care to patients with PAD were identified from the National Vascular Registry and asked to complete an online questionnaire on their provisions for SET. If a centre offered SET, they were asked questions to determine whether the programme was compliant with NICE guidelines and the difficulties they faced delivering the service. If centres did not offer SET, they were asked what obstacles prevented them implement SET.

RESULTS

Of the 78 UK vascular centres, 59 (76%) responded and were included in the audit. Of these, 27 (46%) were able to offer SET but only 21 (36%) could offer it to all their patients with PAD. Only four (6.8%) offered SET that was fully compliant with current NICE guidelines. Reasons identified included insufficient funding, lack of resource and poor patient compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of SET are well established yet the availability of the service in the UK is poor. The reasons for this are readily identified but have not yet been overcome. Research on novel methods of delivering supervised exercise that mitigates existing barriers, such as home exercise with remote monitoring, should be prioritised to facilitate optimal management for our patients with PAD.

Elbow arthroplasty is safe for the management of simple open distal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Elbow arthroplasty (EA) is an established technique for the treatment of select distal humeral fractures, yet little data exists regarding the safety and outcome of EA in the presence of an open distal humeral fracture where the risk of periprosthetic infection is an even greater concern. We hypothesized that EA does not carry an increased risk of infection or other postoperative complications when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures.

METHODS

Seventeen patients underwent total EA (n = 9) or hemiarthroplasty (n = 8) for an open distal humeral fracture. The open fracture component was classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Society system as "simple" or "complex." Outcome measures collected included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion, complications, and reoperations. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation were compared with those who underwent preliminary débridement procedures and subsequent staged arthroplasty. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to analyze other reported cases and contextualize our findings.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 46 months (range, 12-138 months). All fractures were multifragmentary and intra-articular. Sixteen patients had a "simple" open fracture and 1 had a "complex" fracture. The overall mean MEPS was 83 (range, 30-100; standard deviation ± 17), with a mean flexion-extension arc of 96°. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation demonstrated a higher mean flexion arc (116° vs. 79°, P = .02) than those who underwent staged arthroplasty. The mean MEPS was not significantly different between the groups (90 vs. 78, P = .12). Complications included asymptomatic ulna component loosening (n = 1), joint instability (n = 1), and symptomatic heterotopic ossification (n = 3). There were no deep or superficial infections recorded.

CONCLUSION

EA is safe and effective when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. Primary débridement and implantation may offer functional benefits over a staged approach.

Development of a core outcome set for lateral elbow tendinopathy (COS-LET) using best available evidence and an international consensus process

Objectives

To develop a core outcome set for lateral elbow tendinopathy (COS-LET) and to provide guidance for outcome evaluation in future studies.

Methods

We implemented a multi-stage mixed-methods design combining two systematic reviews, domain mapping of outcome measurement instruments to the core domains of tendinopathy, psychometric analysis of instruments, two patient focus groups and a Delphi study incorporating two surveys and an international consensus meeting. Following the OMERACT guidelines, we used a 70% threshold for consensus.

Results

38 clinicians/researchers and 9 patients participated. 60 instruments were assessed for inclusion. The only instrument that was recommended for the COS-LET was Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) for the disability domain. Interim recommendations were made to use: the PRTEE function subscale for the function domain; PRTEE pain subscale items 1, 4 and 5 for the pain over a specified time domain; pain-free grip strength for the physical function capacity domain; a Numerical Rating Scale measuring pain on gripping for the pain on activity/loading domain; and time off work for the participation in life activities domain. No recommendations could be made for the quality-of-life, patient rating of condition and psychological factors domains.

Conclusions

The COS-LET comprises the PRTEE for the disability domain. Interim-use recommendations included PRTEE subscales, time off work, pain-free grip strength and a Numerical Rating Scale measuring pain on gripping. Further work is required to validate these interim measures and develop suitable measures to capture the other domains.

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus managed according to the Modified Dubberley Classification System

BACKGROUND

Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea are relatively uncommon and can be challenging to treat because of variable articular comminution and poor bone stock. Classification is valuable to help guide surgical decision making and prognosis. The aim of this study was to present a large series of coronal shear fractures treated according to the Modified Dubberley Classification System (MDCS).

METHODS

Forty-five patients with a coronal shear fracture were followed up (12-93 months, mean: 28 months) after surgical intervention. Fractures were classified according to the MDCS by 3 observers, and outcome data collected included Oxford elbow score (OES), visual analog pain score (VAS), range of motion, complications, and radiographic findings.

RESULTS

There were 10 type 1, 12 type 2, 8 type 3, and 15 type 4 fractures. There were 26 subtype B fractures (posterior comminution). A total of 37 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 8 primary arthroplasty. The median OES and VAS were 43(16-48) and 2 (0-9), respectively. Median flexion extension arc was 125° (range, 70°-140°). There was no significant difference in OES, VAS, or range of motion according to fracture type (types 1-4), subtype (type a or b), or treatment method (arthroplasty vs. ORIF). The overall complication and reoperation rates were 31% and 33%, respectively. A total of 75% of complications occurred in type 3 and 4 fractures, and there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher complication rate in type B fractures than type A fractures (34% vs. 16%, P = .19). Patients with a type B fracture who underwent screw-only fixation had a significantly lower OES and higher complication rate compared with when they had combined plating with screws (OES, P = .03; complications P = .04) and compared with when an arthroplasty was performed (OES, P = .05; complications P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Consistently good outcomes can be achieved by classification and management according to the MDCS. It is recommended that type B fractures undergo combined plate and screw fixation and that type 4 fractures should be considered for arthroplasty because of the higher risk of complications with ORIF.

Treatment Strategies and Outcomes for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum

BACKGROUND

The optimum management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum is a widely debated subject.

PURPOSE

To better understand the efficacy of different surgical modalities and nonoperative treatment of OCD as assessed by radiological and clinical outcomes and return to sports.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of all treatment studies published between January 1975 and June 2020 was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 76 clinical studies, including 1463 patients, were suitable for inclusion. Aggregate analysis and subgroup analysis of individual patient data were performed to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes between the various nonoperative and surgical treatment options for capitellar OCD. A unified grading system (UGS; grades 1-4) was developed from existing validated classification systems to allow a comparison of patients with similar-grade OCD lesions in different studies according to their treatment. Patient-level data were available for 352 patients. The primary outcome measures of interest were patient-reported functional outcome, range of motion (ROM), and return to sports after treatment. The influences of the capitellar physeal status, location of the lesion, and type of sports participation were also assessed. Each outcome measure was evaluated according to the grade of OCD and treatment method (debridement/microfracture, fragment fixation, osteochondral autograft transplantation [OATS], or nonoperative treatment).

RESULTS

No studies reported elbow scores or ROM for nonoperatively treated patients. All surgical modalities resulted in significantly increased postoperative ROM and elbow scores for stable (UGS grades 1 and 2) and unstable lesions (UGS grades 3 and 4). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement or overall scores according to the type of surgery for stable or unstable lesions. Return to sports was superior with nonoperative treatment for stable lesions, whereas surgical treatment was superior for unstable lesions. Patients with an open capitellar physis had superior ROM for stable and unstable lesions, but there was no correlation with lesion location and the outcomes of OATS versus fragment fixation for high-grade lesions.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative treatment was similar in outcomes to surgical treatment for low-grade lesions, whereas surgical treatment was superior for higher grade lesions. There is currently insufficient evidence to support complex reconstructive techniques for high-grade lesions compared with microfracture/debridement alone.

654 Outcome and Complications Following Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

It is important to understand the rate of complications associated with the increasing burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty. Currently, this has not been well quantified. This review aims to address that deficiency with a focus on (i) shoulder outcome scores, (ii) complication and reoperation rates and (iii) comparison of anatomic and reverse prostheses when used in revision surgery.

Method

A PRISMA systematic review was performed to identify clinical data for patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. Data were extracted from the literature and pooled for analysis. Complication and reoperation rates were analysed using a meta-analysis of proportion and continuous variables underwent comparative subgroup analysis.

Results

107 studies (5,010 shoulders) were eligible for inclusion, although complete clinical data was not ubiquitous. Indications for revision included component loosening 20% (n = 584/2872), instability 20% (n = 577/2872), rotator cuff failure 18% (n = 528/2872) and infection 17% (n = 490/2872). Revision surgery resulted in a clinically important improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Intraoperative complication, postoperative complication and reoperation rates were 3% (n = 205/4919), 22% (n = 722/3474) and 15% (n = 533/3474) respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative complications included iatrogenic humeral fractures (n = 134/205, 65%) and instability (n = 209/772, 27%). Revision to reverse TSA, rather than revision to anatomic TSA from any index prosthesis resulted in lower complication rates (22% vs. 29%, p &lt; 0.001 odds ratio 1.5) and superior Constant scores (59.9 vs. 53.8, p &lt; 0.001), although no difference in ASES scores.

Conclusions

Satisfactory improvement in PROMs are reported following revision shoulder arthroplasty; however, revision surgery is associated with high complication rates and better outcomes may be evident following revision to reverse TSA.

Quotation errors related to the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomization (ProFHER) study

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of quotations of the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomization (ProFHER) study in the published literature.

METHODS

A literature search was performed from March 2015 to November 2019 to identify all papers that reference ProFHER since its publication. Full text articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers using a validated framework of assessing quotation errors. A kappa co-efficient was calculated to assess interobserver reliability of the reviewers.

RESULTS

There were 260 individual ProFHER quoted references within the 138 included articles. We identified 35/260 quotation errors (13%). Of these, 10/35 (29%) were major quotation errors and 25/35 (71%) minor quotation errors. There was substantial interobserver agreement when errors were classified. Of the 10 major errors, six quotations were not substantiated by the results of ProFHER and three were unrelated to ProFHER. One paper contained a quotation error that contradicted the results of ProFHER. Of the 25 minor errors, 19 oversimplified or generalised the conclusions of ProFHER and six contained numerical or grammatical errors.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated substantial inaccuracies in quotations of the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomization study. Vigilance is recommended when quoting the literature and reviewing submitted papers in order to prevent the perpetuation of misquoted data.

Establishing the shadowline: the border between legally acceptable and unacceptable standards of surgical practice

INTRODUCTION

Our study investigated how the standard of surgical care is assessed within the English and Welsh litigation process. The 'shadowline' represents the dividing line between acceptable and unacceptable standards of care. Our hypothesis was that different assessors risk adopting materially different interpretations regarding the acceptable standard of care. Any variation in the interpretation of where the shadowline falls will create uncertainty and unfairness to surgeons and patients alike.

METHODS

We summarised the legal literature and suggested the factors affecting the assessment of surgical standards. We illustrated our findings on distribution curves.

RESULTS

There was a risk that the shape of the curve and the location of the shadowline may vary according to the assessor. Importantly, a gap may have developed between the legal and clinical shadowlines in respect of the consenting process.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

We suggested how a gap between the surgical and legal shadow lines could be narrowed. Clinical governance, balanced literature and realistic expert assessments were all part of the solution.

Outcome and complications following revision shoulder arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

It is important to understand the rate of complications associated with the increasing burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty. Currently, this has not been well quantified. This review aims to address that deficiency with a focus on complication and reoperation rates, shoulder outcome scores, and comparison of anatomical and reverse prostheses when used in revision surgery.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) systematic review was performed to identify clinical data for patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. Data were extracted from the literature and pooled for analysis. Complication and reoperation rates were analyzed using a meta-analysis of proportion, and continuous variables underwent comparative subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 112 studies (5,379 shoulders) were eligible for inclusion, although complete clinical data was not ubiquitous. Indications for revision included component loosening 20% (601/3,041), instability 19% (577/3,041), rotator cuff failure 17% (528/3,041), and infection 16% (490/3,041). Intraoperative complication and postoperative complication and reoperation rates were 8% (230/2,915), 22% (825/3,843), and 13% (584/3,843) respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative complications included iatrogenic humeral fractures (91/230, 40%) and instability (215/825, 26%). Revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), rather than revision to anatomical TSA from any index prosthesis, resulted in lower complication rates and superior Constant scores, although there was no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory improvement in patient-reported outcome measures are reported following revision shoulder arthroplasty; however, revision surgery is associated with high complication rates and better outcomes may be evident following revision to reverse TSA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):618-630.

Tension Suture Fixation of Olecranon Fractures

Background

Mayo type-IIA olecranon fractures are characterized by a transverse or short oblique fracture without articular comminution or ulnohumeral instability. Traditionally, these fractures are treated with a tension-band wiring technique. Despite good rates of fracture union, tension-band wiring is associated with a reoperation rate of 30% to 60%, usually for removal of prominent metalwork. The tension suture technique was developed as an alternative method of fixing Mayo type-IIA fractures using only high-tensile braided nonabsorbable number-2 sutures, with the aim of reducing the reoperation rate associated with tension-band wiring without compromising outcomes. The tension suture technique has subsequently become the only technique we use when treating these fractures.

Description

The patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position under general or regional anesthesia. A direct posterior approach is made, centered over the fracture. The fracture is identified, cleared of hematoma, and reduced with use of a large, pointed reduction clamp to provide interfragmentary compression. A 2.5-mm transverse drill hole is made through the ulna distal to the fracture site. Two sets of number-2 braided nonabsorbable sutures are utilized. The first sutures are passed lateral to medial through the drill hole and used to grasp the medial triceps insertion onto the proximal fragment, then passed back through the transverse drill hole from medial to lateral and used to grasp the lateral triceps insertion onto the proximal fragment. The suture ends are tensioned to remove slack and tied on the lateral aspect of the olecranon. The second sutures are then passed lateral to medial through the transverse drill hole but this time used to grasp the posterolateral triceps insertion on the proximal fragment, then re-passed through the transverse drill hole from medial to lateral, and finally used to grasp the posteromedial triceps insertion. The suture limbs are tensioned and tied on the lateral aspect of the ulna next to the first suture. The clamp is removed, and the construct is tested under full range of motion to ensure there is no evidence of gapping. Fluoroscopy is utilized to confirm reduction before the wound is irrigated and closed in a standard fashion.

Alternatives

Mayo type-IIA fractures may be treated nonoperatively in frail or low-demand patients. Surgical treatment is traditionally performed with the tension-band wiring technique, but plate or intramedullary fixation may also be utilized.

Rationale

This technique negates the metalwork-related complications associated with all other surgical techniques for this fracture type.

Expected Outcomes

In a recent study comparing the tension suture technique with tension-band wiring and plate fixation for Mayo type-IIA fractures, the tension suture technique had a significantly lower reoperation rate compared with tension-band wiring and a lower complication rate compared with plate fixation.

Important Tips

The tension-suture technique is primarily for Mayo type-IIA fractures without ulnohumeral instability or marked articular comminution.Ensure the transverse tunnel in the ulna is at least 3 cm distal to the fracture site and 1 cm anterior to the dorsal cortex of the ulna in order to prevent fracture of the tunnel.Grasp as much of the triceps tendon as possible when placing the sutures through the proximal fragment to prevent pull-out.Tension and tie the sutures with the elbow semi-extended to prevent the construct slackening in elbow extension and to facilitate interfragmentary compression during flexion.

Current concepts in distal humeral hemiarthroplasty

Multi-fragmentary intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus remain a challenge for both patients and surgeons. Open Reduction internal fixation remains the gold standard, however in older patients with comminuted fractures this might not be feasible. There is a growing interest in hemi-arthroplasty as a solution for these cases. However the current experience and follow-up in limited. This review article intends to describe the current concepts in elbow hemiarthroplasty in dept. we will discuss the historical use of these implants, as well as the intricacies of more modern devices. Next we will elaborate an surgical planning, approach, and technical pearls. We will lay out a rehab protocol used by the senior author, and with some considerations for the future.

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for lateral elbow tendinopathy (COS-LET)

BACKGROUND

Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is a common condition that can cause significant disability and associated socioeconomic cost. Although it has been widely researched, outcome measures are highly variable which restricts evidence synthesis across studies. In 2019, a working group of international experts, health care professionals and patients, in the field of tendinopathy (International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus (ICON) Group), published the results of a consensus exercise defining the nine core domains that should be measured in tendinopathy research. The aim of this study is to develop a core outcome set (COS) for LET mapping to these core domains. The primary output will provide a template for future outcome evaluation of LET. In this protocol, we detail the methodological approach to the COS-LET development.

METHODS

This study will employ a three-phase approach. (1) A systematic review of studies investigating LET will produce a comprehensive list of all instruments currently employed to quantify the treatment effect or outcome. (2) Instruments will be matched to the list of nine core tendinopathy outcome domains by a Steering Committee of clinicians and researchers with a specialist interest in LET resulting in a set of candidate instruments. (3) An international three-stage Delphi study will be conducted involving experienced clinicians, researchers and patients. Within this Delphi study, candidate instruments will be selected based upon screening using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) truth, feasibility and discrimination filters with a threshold of 70% agreement set for consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no COS for the measurement or monitoring of LET in trials or clinical practice. The output from this project will be a minimum COS recommended for use in all future English language studies related to LET. The findings will be published in a high-quality journal and disseminated widely using professional networks, social media and via presentation at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database, November 2019. https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1497 .

Management of anteromedial coronoid fractures according to a protocol focused on instability assessment provides good outcomes with infrequent need for coronoid fixation

BACKGROUND

Anteromedial coronoid fractures (AMCFs) are associated with persistent elbow instability and post-traumatic arthritis if managed incorrectly. It is unclear exactly which AMCFs require surgical intervention and how to make this decision. The aims of this study were to report outcomes of AMCFs managed using a protocol based on reproduction of instability using radiographic and clinical testing and to ascertain a threshold size of AMCF associated with instability.

METHODS

Forty-three AMCFs were studied. Thirty-two patients formed the primary study group (group A). All were treated using a protocol in which the decision to perform coronoid fixation was based on the presence of radiographic or clinical evidence of instability. Functional outcomes (Oxford Elbow Score), radiographic outcomes, complications, and reoperations were collected, and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the optimal coronoid fracture height to recommend coronoid fixation. The results were compared with a historical group of 11 patients with AMCFs not treated according to the protocol (group B).

RESULTS

Of the patients, 23 had an isolated AMCF and 20 had a concurrent radial head injury. Complete nonoperative treatment of the elbow was performed in 16 patients (37%) (11 of 32 [34%] in group A vs. 5 of 11 [45%] in group B, P = .46). In 10 patients (23%), only repair of the lateral collateral ligament was performed (9 in group A and 1 in group B), whereas 8 patients (19%) underwent repair of the lateral collateral ligament and radial head fixation or replacement (6 in group A and 2 in group B). Acute coronoid fixation was performed in 9 patients (21%) (6 in group A and 3 in group B). At a mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 12-56 months), group A showed a significantly better Oxford Elbow Score (42 vs. 31, P = .02), lower complication rate (3 of 32 [9%] vs. 8 of 11 [72%], P < .001), and lower reoperation rate (1 of 32 [3%] vs. 6 of 11 [54%], P < .001) than group B. Persistent instability was found in 6 patients in group B and none in group A. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated 6.5 mm to be the optimal AMCF size for surgery to prevent persistent instability.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated according to a protocol in which preoperative reproduction of instability determined the degree of surgical intervention had good clinical and radiographic outcomes. Our study demonstrated that AMCFs > 6.5 mm are likely to be more unstable and require intervention. If these principles are followed, a specifically defined subset of AMCFs can be treated nonsurgically without adverse outcomes.

Indications, Outcomes, and Complications of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow for Chronic Posterolateral Rotatory Instability: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow can lead to pain, recurrent dislocations, and, in the worst-case scenario, disability.

PURPOSE

To report the indications, outcomes, and complication rates of lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for chronic PLRI of the elbow.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The review entailed 17 studies that included 168 patients with isolated LUCL reconstruction for chronic PLRI. Patients with concurrent medial collateral ligament reconstruction were excluded. The primary outcome measures were patient characteristics, indication for surgery, surgical technique, functional outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

Chronic PLRI commonly occurred after a previous traumatic injury (n = 168). Of these, there were 119 simple instabilities (no fracture) and 33 complex instabilities (associated fracture). In 11 patients, PLRI was iatrogenic. The cause was unknown in 5 patients. Grafts used were autograft (n = 102; 61%), allograft (n = 18; 11%), synthetic graft (n = 15; 9%), and unknown (n = 33; 20%). The most common surgical technique was a docking procedure or a modification of this (n = 145; 86%). Other techniques included suture anchors (n = 18; 11%), nonanatomic (n = 1; 0.6%), and unknown (n = 4; 2%). There were 45 complications reported in 37 patients (22%). The most frequent complication was recurrent instability (21/138; 15%). No other major complications were reported. The rate of recurrent instability was significantly higher in revision reconstructions (6/15 elbows; 40%) compared with primary reconstructions (15/123 elbows; 12.2%) (P = .005). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score and abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were 87.5 (range, 40-100) and 18.8 (range, 0-77), respectively. Of the patients in whom range of motion was measured, 134 of 144 patients (93%) regained a functional range (30L-130L).

CONCLUSION

LUCL reconstruction for chronic PLRI proved a reliable method of reconstruction, save for the moderate rate of recurrent instability, which was highest in revision reconstructions.

A Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Versus Open Debridement of the Arthritic Elbow

PURPOSE

To systematically review the available data with regard to clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic and open debridement for elbow arthritis to determine the complication rate with transition to arthroscopic surgery.

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses protocol, a systematic review was performed including studies reporting clinical and functional outcomes following open or arthroscopic debridement of elbow arthritis. The primary outcome measures analyzed were functional outcome (Mayo Elbow Performance Score), range of motion, and complication rate. Data were extracted for the whole group and then compared between the techniques using ranges and forest plots.

RESULTS

In total, 39 level IV and 3 level III studies with 1097 elbows were eligible for inclusion; 684 elbows were treated using an open technique and 413 using an arthroscopic technique. Regarding functional outcome scores, mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved significantly with comparable magnitude of improvement in both groups (arthroscopic group: range 28-34, open group: range 25-31). Regarding range of motion, mean flexion-extension arc improved significantly in both groups (arthroscopic group: range 8-26°, open group: range 13-49°). The open group had a lower preoperative flexion-extension arc (range 63-96) in comparison with the arthroscopic group (range 84-119). The overall incidence of complications was 5.7% (range 0%-19%) in the arthroscopic group and 6.1% (range 0%-25%) in the open group. The most common complication type was neurologic, with an incidence of 2.1% (range 0%-8%) in the arthroscopic group and 1.9% (range 0%-12%) in the open group. The deep infection rate was 0.7% (range 0%-10%) in the open group with no reported incidence in the arthroscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrated good mid-term functional outcomes following debridement arthroplasty of the arthritic elbow. There was no increase in complications with an arthroscopic technique confirming its safety and efficacy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Systematic Review of Level III and IV articles.

Arthroscopic Diagnosis of Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Elbow

Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) is the most common form of symptomatic acute and chronic elbow instability. Diagnosis is usually made using a combination of clinical tests and imaging modalities; however, in more subtle forms of instability, these measures may be equivocal. Arthroscopy is a valuable adjunct for diagnosis and treatment of PLRI. It allows direct appreciation of the instability process, quantification of the degree of instability, and identification of concurrent associated pathology. The aim of this technique article is to report a series of reproducible arthroscopic tests used for diagnosis of PLRI with examples of normal and pathologic arthroscopic findings.

Distal biceps short head tears: repair, reconstruction, and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Isolated short head tears of the distal biceps are uncommon and often underappreciated. The aim of this study was to describe the presenting features and management of acute and chronic short head ruptures treated at our unit and in the published literature.

METHODS

Six short head ruptures in 5 patients are described. The clinical and radiographic findings, operative techniques, and postoperative outcomes are reported for all patients. A systematic review of the existing literature was also performed.

RESULTS

All patients presented with pain and weakness following an acute traumatic event. One patient presented with bilateral tears 3 years apart. Four of the ruptures underwent acute repair. Two ruptures presented chronically with retracted short head tears and were treated with allograft reconstruction of the short head. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings demonstrated retraction of the short head affecting only 1 muscle belly, and in all patients the hook test was intact. All patients reported excellent functional outcome scores with no postoperative complications. The systematic review identified 9 previously reported cases, of which 8 were treated surgically with a successful outcome. Detailed analysis of these cases demonstrated clinical findings consistent with our cases, and these are outlined in depth in the article.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

Isolated short head ruptures are a rare and distinct form of distal biceps tear that present with consistent clinical findings that can aid in diagnosis. They present acutely, have a poor natural history akin to complete tears, and have good outcomes with acute and delayed reconstruction.

Complications After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Distal biceps tendon injuries typically occur in the dominant arm of men in their fourth decade of life. Surgical repair restores flexion and supination strength, resulting in good functional outcome. The complication profile of each surgical approach and fixation technique has not been widely studied in the literature.

PURPOSE

To report the rate of complications after repair of complete distal biceps ruptures, to classify them according to surgical approach and fixation technique, and to analyze risk factors and outcomes of the individual complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Studies published in English on primary repair of the distal biceps between January 1998 and January 2019 were identified. Data on complications were extracted and classified as major and minor for analysis. A quantitative synthesis of data was done to compare the complication rates between (1) limited anterior incision, extensile anterior incision, and double incision and (2) 4 fixation methods.

RESULTS

Seventy-two articles including 3091 primary distal biceps repairs were identified. The overall complication rate was 25% (n = 774). The major complication rate was 4.6% (n = 144) and included a 1.6% (n = 51) rate of posterior interosseous nerve injury; 0.3% (n = 10), median nerve injury; 1.4% (n = 43), rerupture; and a 0.1% (n = 4), synostosis. Brachial artery injury, ulnar nerve injury, compartment syndrome, proximal radius fracture, and chronic regional pain syndrome occurred at a rate of <0.1% each. The majority of nerve injuries resolved with an expectant approach. The minor complication rate was 20.4% (n = 630). The most common complication was lateral cutaneous nerve injury (9.2%, n = 283). An extensile single incision was associated with a higher rate of superficial radial nerve injury when compared to limited single incision(6% vs 2.1%, P = .002). Limited anterior single incision technique had a higher rate of lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury compared to extensile single incision. (9.7% vs 5.2%, P = .03). Synostosis occurred only with double incision. Fixation technique had no significant effect on rerupture rate and posterior interosseous nerve injury rate.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest analysis of complications after distal biceps repair, indicating a major complication rate of 4.6%. This study provides valuable data with regard to the choice of technique, surgical approach, and rate of complications, which is essential for surgical planning and patient consent.

REGISTRATION

CRD42017074066 (PROSPERO).

Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: anatomy, pathology and management - state of the art

All patients with acute complete distal biceps tendon ruptures who are not low demand or medically unfit to proceed with surgery are offered operative repair. This restores arm shape, supination strength and function, and decreases their cramping symptoms. Surgical repair technique varies significantly depending on location and training centre. Nuances in technique and appropriate implant selection need to be noted in order to achieve a strong repair allowing early active range of motion. Intimate knowledge of distal biceps tendon anatomy is key to avoid complications associated with the different approaches. The cumulative body of evidence on complications, coupled with knowledge of the different biomechanical construct strengths of the alternative methods of fixation, points to the use of the cortical button technique without the addition of an interference screw. Subtle variations in drill hole positioning on the bicipital tuberosity secures either an anatomic or non-anatomic repair. Anatomic repair results in greater supination peak torque and fatigue strength, and in greater flexion fatigue strength. It is advisable to perform an anatomic repair in elite athletes or those patients who significantly rely on supination strength and endurance for their livelihood. A universal postoperative protocol is suggested for all repairs.

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: Current concepts and surgical techniques

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are a unique subset of distal humeral fractures which entail partial or complete articular fractures of the distal humerus without involvement of the columns. The very distal nature of these fragments, their small size and propensity for comminution render them challenging to treat surgically. The purpose of this article is to describe the classification, outcomes and surgical techniques currently used for the treatment of these fractures using the available literature and authors' clinical experience.

Biomechanical comparison of transosseous cortical button and Footprint repair techniques for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures

BACKGROUND

The biceps brachii is the main forearm supinator, which is a direct consequence of its anatomic arrangement. The primary aim of distal biceps rupture is to restore supination strength and function. Cadaveric studies demonstrate that anatomic repairs significantly improve the supination moment when compared to more anterior repairs; however, this has not been tested in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical and clinical outcomes of an anatomic repair (Footprint), with a widely used transosseous technique (Endobutton).

METHODS

Twenty-two patients were retrospectively identified from a clinical database (11 Footprint versus 11 Endobutton). Biomechanical performance of strength and endurance for flexion and supination was assessed using a validated isokinetic dynamometry protocol and clinical outcome scores (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score) were collected for all patients.

RESULTS

For supination, the Footprint group demonstrated a superior trend for all biomechanical parameters tested. This was statistically significant for mean peak torque, total work of maximal repetition and work in the last third of repetitive testing (p = 0.031, p = 0.036 and p = 0.048). For flexion, the Footprint group demonstrated a superior trend for all biomechanical parameters tested but this was only statistically significant for work in the last third of repetitive testing (p = 0.039). The clinical outcomes were good or excellent for all patients in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to demonstrate that an anatomic Footprint repair restores superior biomechanical supination strength and endurance compared to a conventional Endobutton technique in a clinical setting. Both techniques, however, provide good or excellent clinical outcomes.

A new radiographic view of the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint-a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint (STTJ) has a complex osseous and ligamentous anatomy. Precise radiographic assessment is paramount when assessing osteoarthritic, post-traumatic, or post-operative patients. There has been no described technique to image the STTJ without any wrist movement, unobscured by the rest of the carpus. The aim of this study was to define an optimal radiographic method to assess the STTJ while maintaining the wrist in neutral position.

METHODS

Computer tomography 3-D reconstructions of three uninjured wrists were initially used to determine an approximate beam angle. Serial radiographs of 12 cadaveric wrists were taken. The forearms were positioned in varying degrees of pronation and supination. The beam angle was concurrently adjusted to varying degrees of caudal tilt. From the images obtained, we assessed if the adjacent carpus obscured the view of the STTJ.

RESULTS

Optimal STTJ imaging was in the semi-pronated wrist position with the X-ray beam tilted caudal. We found that the STTJ was best visualized at 48° supination from a fully pronated wrist and a caudal beam angle of 22°.

CONCLUSIONS

The described wrist and beam orientation can aid in achieving an unobstructed view of the STTJ with little technical effort. This can aid in imaging ambulatory patients where symptoms prevent using other imaging techniques as well as patients in the operating room where imaging timing can be critical.

A silent compartment syndrome following elective minimally invasive mitral valve repair

A 63-year-old male with severe mitral valve regurgitation underwent an elective minimally invasive mitral valve repair. Peripheral cannulation of the right femoral vein and artery was performed with a total cardiopulmonary bypass time of 268 min. There were no intraoperative complications. 12 hours postoperatively the patient reported mild pain in the right lower leg with a subjective decrease in sensation. Compartmental pressures were significantly raised. The patient underwent lower leg fasciotomies, which revealed bulging compartments confirming the diagnosis of an evolving compartment syndrome (CS). This rare case demonstrates the highly variable aetiology, pathophysiology and presenting symptoms of CS. Clinicians in any specialty should consider this diagnosis if there is a possibility of local vascular compromise secondary to an intervention/treatment. This diagnosis is not exclusive to patients with trauma and as such clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for this potentially devastating condition.

Shoulder crane: a concept of suspension, stability, control and motion

Framework and suspensory cascade

This novel model uses the structure and workings of the industrial crane as a simile to explain the function of the human shoulder. As a crane consists of a base, axial tower, boom and suspensory cascade that move and position loads in space, the base consists of the pelvic platform, with outriggers (legs) that provide stability in human body. The axial tower consists of an articulated spinal column and thoracic platform, which are stabilised by the core muscles. The clavicular boom articulates with the anterior thoracic platform and is elevated by the trapezius from the posterior tower. The ‘suspensory cascade’ extends from the skull and cervical spine to the trapezius and on to the clavicle, coracoclavicular ligaments, coracoid process, coracohumeral ligament and humeral head.

Motion

The rotator cuff muscles take origin from the scapula and coalesce with each other to form a multilayered rotator cuff tendon and cable, which cups to closely contain the humeral head. The four muscles insert into the common tendon and together share the load to stabilise and mobilise the arm in space. The coracoid is a pulley that allows the scapula to swivel on the coracoclavicular ligaments to enable adjustment of the angle of force transmission delivered by the rotator cuff to the humeral head.

Stability and control

The inferior glenoid and labrum are a fixed organ of compression, which coalesces with the hammock formed by the static inferior glenohumeral ligaments. The rotator cuff and deltoid compress the humeral head onto this static structure.

The biceps tendon passes adjacent to the condensations of the coracohumeral ligament to insert into the mobile superior labrum and glenoid. Contraction of the biceps pulls the mobile superior labrum onto the humeral head and tightens the glenohumeral ligaments that wrap around the humeral head at the extremes of motion. The coracohumeral ligament is a sensory organ that interfaces with these structures and is well positioned to work as a servomechanism to redirect the rotator cuff in providing stability, control and motion.

Level of evidence

Level V.

Application of dermal chlorhexidine antisepsis is ineffective at reducing Proprionibacterium acnes colonization in shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND

Chlorhexidine as a skin surface antiseptic has been shown to be ineffective with respect to reducing Proprionibacterium acnes colonization within the dermis. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the application of aqueous chlorhexidine solution to the dermal layer decreased P. acnes colonization during open shoulder surgery.

METHODS

The present study enrolled 50 patients who were undergoing open shoulder surgery. Patients received standard antimicrobial preparation. Three dermal swabs were taken from each patient: swab 1 following skin incision; swab taken 2 minutes to 5 minutes post-application of aqueous chlorhexidine to the dermis; and swab 3 taken 60 minutes post-application.

RESULTS

Mean age was 57.5 years (22 males, 28 females). There were 21 patients (42%) with P. acnes present on any dermal swab. There were significantly more P. acnes positive cultures identified at swab 3 compared to swab 1 (p = 0.043). In nine patients with positive P. acnes at cultures swab 1, eight also isolated P. acnes after at swabs 2 or 3. Males were significantly more likely to have P. acnes on any swab (p < 0.001). Positive P. acnes cultures were significantly more common in patients ≤50 years (p < .001). None of the patients had any clinical signs of infection at a minimum of 1 year following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermal application of aqueous chlorhexidine during open shoulder surgery fails to eradicate or reduce P. acnes on deep cultures.

Informed consent: the view from the trenches

We review some of the recent literature on consent for surgical procedures and suggest a scheme for obtaining surgical consent.

The Provision of Primary and Revision Elbow Replacement Surgery in the NHS

BESS Surgical Procedure Guidelines (SPGs). Optimising Surgical Outcomes for Shoulder and Elbow patients. The British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) SPGs are a series of evidence and consensus Best Practice Recommendations developed by BESS surgeons and physiotherapists to help drive quality improvement and achieve the best possible surgical outcomes for UK patients. This SPG on primary and revision elbow replacement surgery is supported and endorsed by both the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) Programme.

Functional outcome of open acromioclavicular joint stabilization for instability following distal clavicle resection

Background

Acromioclavicular joint instability following distal clavicle resection can result in considerable pain and dysfunction.

Method

We present a review of 13 patients who underwent ACJ stabilization following one or more distal clavicle resection procedures.

Results

The mean Quick DASH and CM scores were 26(0-57) and 73(46-100) respectively. All but one patient reported an improvement in the pain component of their CM score and in the work component of the Quick DASH score.

Discussion

Open ACJ stabilization to treat instability following distal clavicle resection resulted in improved functional scores, pain scores and facilitated return to work in most patients.Level of evidence IV.

Radioscapholunate fusion with triquetrum and distal pole of scaphoid excision: long-term follow-up

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of radioscapholunate fusion, with and without distal pole of scaphoid excision and excision of the triquetrum. These compromised three operative groups. Seventeen patients were identified with a minimum of 10 years follow-up, with a mean of 15 years (range 10-19). Fifteen of the 17 patients were satisfied with their outcome. Two were converted to total wrist fusion. The mean outcomes scores were; pain visual analogue scale score 2.1/10, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand 29 and Modified Mayo Wrist score 60. Patients with excision of the triquetrum had a mean radial-ulnar arc increase of 10° compared with the other two groups, but this was not statistically significant. The mean space for the scaphocapitate joint was 1.7 mm and lunocapitate joint was 1.3 mm at latest follow-up. Close adherence to the indications and surgical technique provided a sustainable good clinical outcome. Patients who obtained a good result at 2 years were likely to achieve a good long-term outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Lunate fractures and associated radiocarpal and midcarpal instabilities: a systematic review

The aim of this study was to analyse lunate fractures and any associated osseo-ligamentous injuries. A systematic review identified 34 cases. We identified carpal instabilities at the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints in volar and dorsal directions. Radiocarpal instabilities (10/34) were usually dorsoradial (8/10), with a transverse lunate fracture, best seen on a coronal image. Midcarpal instabilities (24/34) were usually volar (14/18), with a volar lunate shear fracture, best seen on a sagittal image. Instabilities were sub-classified into non-displaced, subluxated and dislocated. Associated fractures of the scaphoid and the radial and ulnar styloid processes were common. Lunate fractures without subluxation or dislocation had good outcomes with cast immobilization or fixation of associated fractures. Lunate fracture-subluxations are unstable injuries that are best managed with fixation of the carpal fractures. Lunate fracture-dislocations are complex injuries, requiring stabilization of the lunate, associated fractures and ligament injuries; complications are common and acute or delayed salvage procedures may be required.

Plate versus intramedullary fixation of two-part and multifragmentary displaced midshaft clavicle fractures - a long-term analysis

INTRODUCTION

Surgical fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is predominantly achieved with intramedullary (IM) or plate fixation. Both techniques have potential pitfalls: plate fixation involves greater periosteal stripping and protuberance of the implant, whereas IM fixation may be associated with implant-related complications, such as migration or skin irritation, which may lead to further surgery for implant removal. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods in simple (Robinson 2b.1) and multifragmentary (Robinson 2b.2) displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A total of 133 consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation for a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with either IM fixation using a 2.5-mm Kirschner wire or plate fixation using an 8-hole Dynamic Compression Plate (DCP) were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was a minimum of 1 year. The patients were allocated into two injury groups: displaced simple 2-part fractures (64 IM vs. 16 DCP) and displaced multifragmentary fractures (27 IM vs. 26 DCP). The major observed outcome measures were: infection rate, non-union rate, reoperation rate and postoperative range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

Rates of non-union for displaced 2-part fractures were 2/64 (3.13%) with IM fixation and 0/16 (0.00%) with plate fixation (p = 0.477). For displaced multifragmentary fractures, rates of non-union were 2/27 (7.41%) with IM fixation and 0/26 (0.00%) with plate fixation (p = 0.161). No significant difference was observed between the two fixation modalities in patient-reported time to regain ROM on the injured side for displaced 2-part fractures (p = 0.129) and displaced multifragmentary fractures (p = 0.070). Deep infection rate was zero (p = 1.000) overall in the study, and reoperation rate for IM and plate fixation, respectively, was 3.13% and 6.25% in the Robinson 2b.1 group (p = 0.559) and 7.41% and 7.69% in the Robinson 2b.2 group (p = 0.969).

CONCLUSION

IM fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (Robinson 2b.1) has an equivalent non-union rate to plate fixation and similarly low complication and reoperation rates. For displaced midshaft multifragmentary clavicle fractures (Robinson 2b.2), the higher non-union rates observed with IM fixation leads us to recommend consideration of plate fixation for Robinson 2b.2 fractures.

Safe intramedullary fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with 2.5mm Kirschner wires - technique description and a two-part versus multifragmentary fracture fixation outcome comparison

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to present a modified Murray and Schwarz 2.5-mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) intramedullary (IM) technique for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (DMCF), and to compare the differences in treatment outcome of two-part (Robinson 2B.1) and multifragmentary (Robinson 2B.2) DMCF.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 91 patients who underwent IM fixation with a 2.5-mm K-wire for DMCF and had a 1-year post-operative follow-up between 2000 and 2012 was performed. The patients were allocated into two groups: Robinson 2B.1 (n = 64) and Robinson 2B.2 (n = 27). Assessed outcomes were non-union, reoperation rate, wire migration and infection.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of non-union (2B.1,2B.2; 3.13%, 7.41%; p = 0.365), reoperation (2B.1, 2B.2; 3.13%, 7.41%; p = 0.365), K-wire migration (2B.1, 2B.2; 0.00%, 0.00%; p = 1.00) and clavicle shortening at 12-months (2B.1, 2B.2; 3.13%, 7.41%; p = 0.365).

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary clavicle fixation with a 2.5-mm K-wire is a safe surgical technique. 2B.1 injuries treated with 2.5-mm IM K-wire fixation have relatively improved outcome compared with displaced 2B.2 fractures for both non-union and reoperation rates. There were no occurrences of implant migration with either 2B.1 or 2B.2 injuries, and a non-significant difference in implant irritation was documented with IM K-fixation. The non-union rate with K-wire IM fixation of 2B.1 injuries concords with the published results of other IM devices and thus this technique should be added to the surgeon's armamentarium when considering surgical treatment of such injuries.

Tension band suture fixation for olecranon fractures

Olecranon fractures are common and often require surgical treatment when displaced. Traditional methods of stabilization using tension band wire fixation and plate fixation achieve adequate union and function but are associated with a high rate of re-operation and wound problems because of prominent metalwork. The purpose of the present article is to describe an all suture technique for fixation of simple olecranon fractures that maintains inter-fragmentary compression, provides bony union and reduces the rate of re-operation caused by prominent metalwork.

Fracture line morphology of complex proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess proximal humeral fracture patterns using 3-dimensional computed tomography images and relate them to the normal osseous landmarks and soft-tissue attachments.

METHODS

Forty-eight 3-dimensional computed tomography scans of proximal humeral fractures were retrospectively collected, and the fractures were transcribed onto proximal humeral templates. We analyzed the common location and orientation of the fracture lines, with a focus on fractures of the articular surface, tuberosities, metaphysis, and proximal diaphysis. These fractures were compared with the attachments of the rotator cuff and glenohumeral capsule.

RESULTS

Fifty-two percent of the fractures involved the articular surface. No fractures passed through the bicipital groove, and fractures were more commonly found on the posterior lesser tuberosity and on the anterior greater tuberosity, coinciding with the intervals between the rotator cuff tendon insertions. Intracapsular fractures of the calcar were more common (68%) than extracapsular fractures (32%). On the anterolateral aspect of the proximal humerus, fractures radiated from the articular margin, vertically down through the tuberosity zone between the rotator cuff footprints, meeting horizontally oriented fractures in the metaphyseal zone. On the posterior aspect, vertical fractures from the tuberosity zone continued downward to the metaphyseal zone adjacent to the infraspinatus and teres minor footprints.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractures of the proximal humerus follow characteristic patterns. Fractures frequently split the greater tuberosity and are closely related to the intervals of the rotator cuff attachments.

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER DISTAL BICEPS BRACHII REPAIR: A CASE SERIES

OBJECTIVES

To investigate outcomes after surgical repair of distal biceps tendon rupture and the influence of arm dominance on isokinetic flexion and supination results.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

While relatively uncommon, rupture of the distal biceps tendon can result in significant strength deficits, for which surgical repair is recommended. The purpose of this study was to assess patient reported functional outcomes and muscle performance following surgery.

METHODS

A sample of 23 participants (22 males, 1 female), who had previously undergone surgical repair of the distal biceps tendon, were re-examined at a minimum of one year after surgery. Biodex isokinetic elbow flexion and supination testing was performed to assess strength (as measured by peak torque) and endurance (as measured by total work and work fatigue). The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and Mayo Elbow Performance Scale (MEPS) were used to assess participants' subjectively reported functional recovery.

RESULTS

At a mean of 7.6 years after surgical repair, there were no differences between the repaired and uninvolved elbows in peak torque (p = 0.47) or total work (p = 0.60) for flexion or supination. There was also no difference in elbow flexion work fatigue (p = 0.22). However, there was significantly less work fatigue in supination, which was likely influenced by arm dominance, as most repairs were to the dominant arm, F(1,22)=5.67, p = 0.03.

CONCLUSION

The long-term strength of the repaired elbow was similar to the uninvolved elbow after surgery to the distal biceps tendon. Endurance of the repaired elbow was similar in flexion but greater in supination, probably influenced by arm dominance.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Elbow hemiarthroplasty for the management of distal humeral fractures: current technique, indications and results

There has been a growing recent interest in the use of elbow hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of distal humeral trauma in select patients. However, the current available evidence regarding outcome after elbow hemiarthroplasty is limited to case series and biomechanical data. Consequently, the procedure remains unfamiliar to many surgeons. The aim of the present review is to outline the evidence regarding elbow hemiarthroplasty and to use this, along with the author's experience, to better describe the indications, surgical technique and outcomes after this procedure.