Efficacy of Cemiplimab as Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common skin cancer in the White population. Unfortunately, the prognosis of advanced cSCC is poor, and management can be challenging. Until recently, the choice of systemic medications was limited, and those that were available had modest efficacy. Cemiplimab is an anti-programmed cell-death protein 1 inhibitor and the first immunotherapeutic agent approved for the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced cSCC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cemiplimab when used as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in patients treated at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cSCC who were treated with cemiplimab as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy at a single institution between February 2019 and November 2022 was performed. Response to treatment was objectively assessed based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, criteria. The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included time to observed response, disease-control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects of therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 6 patients were identified with a median age of 79 years (range, 51-90 years). Four patients had locally advanced cSCC, and 2 had distant metastasis. Cemiplimab was used as adjuvant therapy in 3 patients and neoadjuvant therapy in 2 patients. There was 1 patient in which it was used for limb salvage, who would have otherwise required an amputation. Objective response rate, complete response, and partial response were 66% (4 of 6), 33% (2 of 6), and 33% (2 pf 6), respectively. Average time to observed response was 2.9 months. Disease-control rate was 83% (5 of 6), and average progression-free survival was 10 months. Toxicity was reported in 2 patients, both of which were grade 1 severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Cemiplimab has established its utility in the treatment of advanced cSCC, demonstrating clinical efficacy while generally having a tolerable adverse effect profile. Our preliminary results suggest that cemiplimab has potential as an adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in combination with surgery for treatment of cSCC.

Concurrent durvalumab and radiation therapy (DUART) followed by adjuvant durvalumab in patients with localized urothelial cancer of bladder: results from phase II study, BTCRC-GU15-023

BACKGROUND

Patients with bladder cancer (BC) who are cisplatin ineligible or have unresectable disease have limited treatment options. Previously, we showed targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) with durvalumab (durva) and radiation therapy (RT) combination was safe in BC. We now report results from a phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of durva and RT in localized BC.

METHODS

This is a single-arm, multi-institutional phase II study; N=26. Enrolled patients had pure or mixed urothelial BC (T2-4 N0-2 M0) with unresectable tumors and were unfit for surgery or cisplatin ineligible. Patients received durva concurrently with RT ×7 weeks, followed by adjuvant durva × 1 year.

PRIMARY ENDPOINTS

(A) progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year and (B) disease control rate (DCR) post adjuvant durva. Key secondary endpoints: (A) complete response (CR) post durvaRT (8 weeks), (B) overall survival (OS), (C) PFS and (D) toxicity. Correlative studies included evaluation of baseline tumor and blood (baseline, post durvaRT) for biomarkers.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 27 months. Evaluable patients: 24/26 post durvaRT, 22/26 for DCR post adjuvant durva, all patients for PFS and OS. Post adjuvant durva, DCR was seen in 72.7%, CR of 54.5%. 1-year PFS was 71.5%, median PFS was 21.8 months. 1-year OS was 83.8%, median OS was 30.8 months. CR at 8 weeks post durvaRT was 62.5%. Node positive (N+) patients had similar median PFS and OS. DurvaRT was well tolerated. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events: anemia, high lipase/amylase, immune-nephritis, transaminitis, dyspnea (grade 4-COPD/immune), fatigue, rash, diarrhea and scleritis. No difference in outcome was observed with PD-L1 status of baseline tumor. Patients with CR/PR or SD had an increase in naïve CD4 T cells, a decrease in PD-1+CD4 T cells at baseline and an increase in cytokine-producing CD8 T cells, including interferon gamma (IFNγ) producing cells, in the peripheral blood.

CONCLUSION

Durva with RT followed by adjuvant durva was safe with promising efficacy in localized BC patients with comorbidities, including N+ patients. Larger randomized studies, like S1806 and EA8185, are needed to evaluate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy and RT in BC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02891161.

Phase II trial of the IDO pathway inhibitor indoximod plus pembrolizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma

Background

The indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway is a key counter-regulatory mechanism that, in cancer, is exploited by tumors to evade antitumor immunity. Indoximod is a small-molecule IDO pathway inhibitor that reverses the immunosuppressive effects of low tryptophan (Trp) and high kynurenine (Kyn) that result from IDO activity. In this study, indoximod was used in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab for the treatment for advanced melanoma.

Methods

Patients with advanced melanoma were enrolled in a single-arm phase II clinical trial evaluating the addition of indoximod to standard of care CPI approved for melanoma. Investigators administered their choice of CPI including pembrolizumab (P), nivolumab (N), or ipilimumab (I). Indoximod was administered continuously (1200 mg orally two times per day), with concurrent CPI dosed per US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved label.

Results

Between July 2014 and July 2017, 131 patients were enrolled. (P) was used more frequently (n=114, 87%) per investigator’s choice. The efficacy evaluable population consisted of 89 patients from the phase II cohort with non-ocular melanoma who received indoximod combined with (P).

The objective response rate (ORR) for the evaluable population was 51% with confirmed complete response of 20% and disease control rate of 70%. Median progression-free survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 6.4 to 24.9). The ORR for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients was 70% compared with 46% for PD-L1-negative patients. The combination was well tolerated, and side effects were similar to what was expected from single agent (P).

Conclusion

In this study, the combination of indoximod and (P) was well tolerated and showed antitumor efficacy that is worth further evaluation in selected patients with advanced melanoma.

Machine learning analysis using 77,044 genomic and transcriptomic profiles to accurately predict tumor type

•

CUP occurs in as many as 3–5% of patients when standard diagnostic tests are not able to determine the origin of cancer.

•

MI GPSai (Genomic Prevalence Score) is an AI that uses genomic and transcriptomic data to elucidate tumor origin.

•

The algorithm was trained on molecular data from 57,489 cases and validated on 19,555 cases.

•

MI GPSai predicted the tumor type out of 21 options in the labeled data set with an accuracy of over 94% on 93% of cases.

•

When also considering the second highest prediction, the accuracy increases to 97%.

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) occurs in 3–5% of patients when standard histological diagnostic tests are unable to determine the origin of metastatic cancer. Typically, a CUP diagnosis is treated empirically and has very poor outcomes, with median overall survival less than one year. Gene expression profiling alone has been used to identify the tissue of origin but struggles with low neoplastic percentage in metastatic sites which is where identification is often most needed. MI GPSai, a Genomic Prevalence Score, uses DNA sequencing and whole transcriptome data coupled with machine learning to aid in the diagnosis of cancer. The algorithm trained on genomic data from 34,352 cases and genomic and transcriptomic data from 23,137 cases and was validated on 19,555 cases. MI GPSai predicted the tumor type in the labeled data set with an accuracy of over 94% on 93% of cases while deliberating amongst 21 possible categories of cancer. When also considering the second highest prediction, the accuracy increases to 97%. Additionally, MI GPSai rendered a prediction for 71.7% of CUP cases. Pathologist evaluation of discrepancies between submitted diagnosis and MI GPSai predictions resulted in change of diagnosis in 41.3% of the time. MI GPSai provides clinically meaningful information in a large proportion of CUP cases and inclusion of MI GPSai in clinical routine could improve diagnostic fidelity. Moreover, all genomic markers essential for therapy selection are assessed in this assay, maximizing the clinical utility for patients within a single test.

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: a multicenter, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults. In contrast to cutaneous melanoma (CM), there is no standard therapy, and the efficacy and safety of dual checkpoint blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab is not well defined.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic UM (mUM) who received treatment with ipilimumab plus nivolumab across 14 academic medical centers. Toxicity was graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

89 eligible patients were identified. 45% had received prior therapy, which included liver directed therapy (29%), immunotherapy (21%), targeted therapy (10%) and radiation (16%). Patients received a median 3 cycles of ipilimumab plus nivolumab. The median follow-up time was 9.2 months. Overall response rate was 11.6%. One patient achieved complete response (1%), 9 patients had partial response (10%), 21 patients had stable disease (24%) and 55 patients had progressive disease (62%). Median OS from treatment initiation was 15 months and median PFS was 2.7 months. Overall, 82 (92%) of patients discontinued treatment, 34 due to toxicity and 27 due to progressive disease. Common immune-related adverse events were colitis/diarrhea (32%), fatigue (23%), rash (21%) and transaminitis (21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual checkpoint inhibition yielded higher response rates than previous reports of single-agent immunotherapy in patients with mUM, but the efficacy is lower than in metastatic CM. The median OS of 15 months suggests that the rate of clinical benefit may be larger than the modest response rate.

Elevated serum activin A and PD-L1 and survival in the CCTG MA.31 phase III trial (trastuzumab vs. lapatinib) in first-line HER2+ metastatic breast cancer

1031

Background: In MA.31 the trastuzumab-taxane combination led to longer PFS than lapatinib-taxane in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In MA.31 we previously reported the prognostic/predictive utility of pretreatment serum PD-L1 (SABCS 2018, PD3-10) and serum activin A (SABCS 2016, P6-07-06) separately; here we evaluate them combined. Methods: MA.31 accrued 652 centrally and/or locally-identified HER2-positive patients, and pretreatment serum was available for 382 patients (184 in trastuzumab arm, 198 in lapatinib arm). The ELLA immunoassay platform (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA) was used to quantitate serum PD-L1, and ELISA for activin A (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Results: In correlation analysis, pretreatment serum PD-L1 was moderately correlated with serum activin A (r = 0.21, p = 0.004). In univariate analysis for OS, the combination of higher serum PD-L1 and higher serum activin A (median cutpoints) (vs. both low) was significant for shorter OS in the trastuzumab arm (HR 6.62, p=0.0005) and in the lapatinib arm (HR 3.25, p=0.0003)(table). In multivariate analysis for OS (17 covariates included), elevated serum activin A/PD-L1 combination remained the most significant independent covariate in the trastuzumab arm (HR 12.40, p=0.001), and in the lapatinib arm (HR 5.2, p=0.0001). Conclusions: In the CCTG MA.31 trial, elevated pretreatment serum activin A (TGF-B superfamily) and PD-L1 was associated with a shorter OS to HER2-targeted treatment. Multiple mechanisms, including immune evasion, may decrease the effectiveness of HER2-targeted therapy. Elevated serum activin A and PD-L1 may identify HER2-positive MBC patients who would benefit from inhibitors of the HER2, PD-1, and activin A pathways. [Table: see text]

The cost of prostate cancer care to society and to patients in the United States

116

Background: Our objectives are to characterize prostate cancer patient resource consumption and cost (I) to society, in 1 calendar year; and (II) to the patient, 1 year after his diagnosis. Methods: The MarketScan database was used to summarize cost, including gross payment to provider for service, copayment, and deductibles. We identified the top 20 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to characterize which procedures drove costs for both objectives. For Objective I, diagnoses were identified in 1 calendar year (2014); codes and their costs for all patients were calculated. For Objective II, diagnoses were set at time = 0, and all CPT and International Classification of Diseases codes were characterized 1 year after diagnosis (2012-2013). Results: For objective I, there were 95,642 procedures totalling $38,696,423. The plurality of procedures were hospital consultations, level 2 (i.e. history + physical + straightforward decision-making; 17,103 performed, average $80 each, total $1,418,954) and level 3 (+ low complexity decision-making; 9,726 performed; average $127 each, total $1,232,928). The most costly procedure to society was a radical prostatectomy (8,883 performed, average $2,003 each, total $17,694,508) with accompanying anesthesia (7,960 performed, average $1262 each, total $10,048,653). For objective II (characterized in Table), the mean payment per month was $2,794, including mean gross cost $2,673, mean copayment $32, and mean deductible $46. Conclusions: The typical cost of therapy to a prostate cancer patient is $2,800/month after diagnosis, primarily from surgery (constituting the majority of cost to society) and subsequently from office visits (constituting the plurality of procedures). Societal measures to reduce cost should be aimed at the operating room and consultations.[Table: see text]

Isolated limb infusion as a treatment option for malignant granular cell tumour

A 54-year-old man presented with a painful lesion on the right posterior calf with MRI identifying a 5 cm lesion in the medial head of the gastrocnemius. He underwent wide local excision of the tumour, and the final pathology was consistent with atypical granular cell tumour. Three years later, he developed a recurrent right popliteal mass. Complete staging workup also identified multiple lung nodules and a caecal polyp that were consistent with metastatic granular cell tumour. He was started on pazopanib and deemed a poor candidate for palliative resection due to encasement of the popliteal vessels. The patient refused above-the-knee amputation (AKA) at that point and was evaluated for isolated limb infusion as an alternative. He received three cycles of isolated limb infusion within a 2-year period and achieved good response from the first two cycles. He underwent AKA 4 years after his diagnosis of malignant granular cell tumours and is currently doing well.

Effect of creative writing on mood in cancer patients

178

Background: Patients with cancer may have significant mental health comorbidity. Creative writing has a substantial history in providing a wide range of psychological benefits for cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a pilot study to determine feasibility whether cancer patients can be enrolled, randomized and retained for four weeks for creative writing classes (Feasibility was defined as 50% of our enrolled patients on intervention arm (IA) could attend at least 2 classes). We anticipated enrolling 45 patients over the period of 2 months with randomization into 2 arms: IA and standard of care (SOC). “Write from the Heart”, a series of creative writing workshops (CWW) were conducted on IA. Subjects in IA had four, 2-hour weekly CWW whereas SOC arm did not receive any sessions. We used validated Emotional Thermometer Scales (ETS), ranging from 0 (best)-10 (worst), to predict changes in parameters reflecting patient’s mental health pre and post intervention. ETS has five dimensions (distress, anxiety, depression, anger and need help), which are all continuous variables. Results: Total of 16 patients were accrued -11 in IA and 5 in SOC. 7 out of 11 (63%) patients enrolled in IA attended at least 75% of classes. Comparisons were made using two-sample T-tests. Although sample size was small, analysis showed intriguing results. IA did show a decreasing pattern on Total Emotion Score (TES). For each visit, post-class scores were lower than pre-class scores. SOC versus IA and IA intragroup analysis (Paired T-test) did not reveal any statistical significance. Conclusions: We observed that it is feasible for cancer patients to attend focused workshops geared towards mental health wellbeing. Although not statistically significant, IA showed trend towards mood improvement. A second study is planned with a single arm for all cancer patients. In addition to using emotional thermometers, we will include questionnaires to evaluate mental health symptoms effectively. Further prospective clinical studies should be conducted to evaluate effect of this intervention in cancer patients. Clinical trial information: Study 00006541. [Table: see text]

Abstract LB-239: Pharmacodynamic changes confirm the mechanism of action mediating SD-101 efficacy, in combination with pembrolizumab, in a phase 1b/2 study in metastatic melanoma (MEL-01)

Introduction: SD-101 is a synthetic CpG oligonucleotide agonist of Toll-like receptor 9. SD-101 stimulates dendritic cells to release interferon-alpha and mature into antigen presenting cells that effectively activate T cell responses. Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of multiple tumors including metastatic melanoma. In mouse tumor models, SD-101 synergizes with anti-PD-1 inducing substantial infiltration of tumor-reactive T cells and durable, complete responses in all treated animals. The MEL-01 trial assesses the safety and preliminary efficacy of SD-101 in combination with pembrolizumab in stage IIIC-IV melanoma. Previously presented clinical data suggest enhanced efficacy for this combination. Biomarker data from the MEL-01 trial support the mechanism of action of SD-101.

Methods: The dose escalation phase of this trial is a modified 3 + 3 design with 4 dose levels of SD-101 (1, 2, 4, and 8 mg) in combination with pembrolizumab. SD-101 is injected into a single tumor lesion qw X 4 followed by q3w X 7. Pembrolizumab is dosed at 200 mg IV q3w. Specimens for biomarker analyses included biopsies of the injected tumor and peripheral blood, and were taken before and after treatment (Days 29, 85 and 169). Biopsies were analyzed by multiplexed immunohistochemistry and Nanostring to evaluate the immunophenotype of the tumor environment. Peripheral blood collected immediately before and 24 hours after dosing was analyzed by qPCR with a panel of interferon (IFN) responsive genes to confirm target engagement. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST v1.1.

Results: IFN signature profiling in blood indicated that SD-101 engages its target in a dose-dependent manner. In tumor biopsies taken after the fourth intratumoral injection, an elevated IFN signature was also observed, confirming persistent local immune activation. Nanostring assessments demonstrated increases in multiple immune cell types in tumors in a subset of patients. In particular, an increase in Th1 responses and a decrease in Th2 responses were found, a shift which is consistent the mechanism of action of SD-101. Immunophenotypic signatures generally correlated with tumor response and were greater in patients naïve to PD-1 treatment compared to patients who previously progressed on PD-1 treatment. Signals for immune suppression generally showed an inverse correlation with clinical response. An elevated CD8 profile was detected by Nanostring and confirmed by immunohistochemistry showing increased CD8+ T cell infiltration in tumors.

Conclusions: Biomarker assessments of the tumor microenvironment in melanoma patients receiving SD-101 and pembrolizumab demonstrate an immunophenotype with CD8 infiltration and a Th1 driven immune response consistent with the mechanism of action and anti-tumor activity of this combination.

Citation Format: Albert Candia, Cristiana Guiducci, Robert L. Coffman, Graeme Currie, Abraham Leung, Robert Janssen, Shivaani Kummar, Sanjiv Agarwala, John Nemunaitis, Rene Gonzalez, Joseph Drabick, Antoni Ribas. Pharmacodynamic changes confirm the mechanism of action mediating SD-101 efficacy, in combination with pembrolizumab, in a phase 1b/2 study in metastatic melanoma (MEL-01) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-239. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-239

Dexamethasone may be the most efficacious corticosteroid for use as monotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Corticosteroids have been used in the therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) for decades, both as monotherapy and in combination with additional agents. In this article the authors report the results of a phase II trial of dexamethasone versus prednisolone as monotherapy for CRPC. The study suggests improved PSA and radiographic response rates as well as improved time to PSA progression for dexamethasone over prednisolone therapy; however the differences only trend toward statistical significance. Nonetheless, in light of these data, when treating patients with corticosteroid monotherapy for CRPC it may be prudent to consider using daily dexamethasone over prednisone/prednisolone.

Fatal malignant metastastic epithelioid angiomyolipoma presenting in a young woman: case report and review of the literature

Epithelioid angiomyolipomas (EAMLs) are rare mesenchymal tumors whose malignant variant is extremely uncommon and highly aggressive. Treatment strategies include chemo radiation, transcatheter arterial embolization and surgical resection, which has remained the mainstay treatment. Targeted therapies including mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors such as Temsirolimus may offer some hope for progressive malignant EAMLs that are not amenable to other treatment modalities. We report a fatal case in a young female who presented with rapidly progressive metastatic EAML that did not respond to mTOR therapy. The literature has shown reduction in tumor burden with the use of mTOR inhibitors, but unfortunately due to the rarity of malignant EAML, a meaningful approach to treatment remains challenging.

Development of an anti-core lipopolysaccharide vaccine for the prevention and treatment of sepsis

Sepsis continues to be a leading cause of death among hospitalized patients. Despite advances in supportive care and the availability of potent antimicrobials, the mortality exceeds 20%. The passive infusion of antibodies directed against a conserved region of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Gram-negative bacteria was highly protective in an early study (NEJM 307 [1982] 1225). When this and similar preparations were unable to show consistent efficacy, efforts were directed towards other strategies, including cytokine modulation. Our group found that a whole bacterial vaccine made from the Escherichia coli O111:B4, J5 (Rc chemotype) mutant induced protective antibodies when given passively as treatment for sepsis in a neutropenic rat model. A subunit vaccine, composed of detoxified J5 LPS complexed to group B meningococcal outer membrane protein (OMP), provided similar protection when antibodies were given passively, or induced actively in both the neutropenic and cecal ligation/puncture models of sepsis. A phase I study in 24 subjects (at 5, 10 and 25 microg doses [based on LPS] for each group of 8) revealed the vaccine to be well-tolerated with no systemic endotoxin-like effects. Although a two to three-fold increase in antibody levels over baseline (by ELISA assay) was observed at the 10 and 25 microg doses, the plasma from both high and low responders reduced LPS-induced cytokine generation in whole blood. Reimmunization of six subjects at 12 months did not convert low responders to high responders or boost the still elevated anti-J5 LPS levels of high responders. If functional assays of anti-LPS antibodies are better predictors of vaccine efficacy than ELISA antibody levels, then it will be necessary to determine which of many potential assays best correlates with protection in animal models. We are currently comparing a panel of functional assays with protective efficacy in animal models of sepsis, as well as the ability of adjuvants to enhance vaccine efficacy. The availability of an effective anti-endotoxin vaccine will provide additional therapeutic options for the prevention and/or treatment of sepsis.