Impact of arterial location, pressure wave indicators, and measurement devices on arterial form factor and mean and central arterial pressure

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is often estimated from cuff systolic (S) and diastolic (D) blood pressure (BP) using a fixed arterial form factor (FF, usually 0.33). If MAP is measured directly, a true FF can be calculated: FF = [MAP-DBP]/[SBP-DBP]. Because waveform shapes vary, true FF should also vary and MAP accuracy will be affected. We studied factors affecting FF using radial tonography (SphygmoCor, n = 376) or brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph, n = 157) and to compare devices, 101 pairs were matched precisely for SBP and DBP. SphygmoCor brachioradial FF correlated strongly with central FF (r2 = 0.75), central augmentation index (cAI, r2 = 0.39), and inversely with pulse pressure amplification (PPA) ratio (r2 = 0.44) [all p < 0.000]; brachioradial FF was lower than central (c) FF (0.34 vs. 0.44, 95% CI's [0.23,0.46] and [0.34,0.54], p < 0.000). On forward stepwise regression, brachioradial FF correlated with PPA ratio, age, heart rate, and cAI (multiple-r2 0.63, p < 0.000). With Mobil-O-Graph: brachial FF was fixed, lower than the corresponding cFF [mean(SD)] 0.46(0.00098) vs. 0.57(0.048), p < 0.000], and uncorrelated with clinical characteristics; MAP and cSBP were higher than SphygmoCor by 6.3 and 2.2 mmHg (p < 0.005) at the midpoint with systematic negative biases. We conclude that FF derived from radial tonometry (SphygmoCor) varies with pulse wave morphology within and between individuals and by measurement site, age, and heart rate. With oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph), brachial FF was fixed and high and unrelated to other clinical variables; MAP and cSBP were higher than tonometry, with systematic negative biases.

Cardiovascular Health in a Single Community in Rural Haiti: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction

There is a growing burden of cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries and assessment of cardiovascular health (CVH) may identify populations at risk for poor CVH.

Methods

Between July 2014 and August 2014, we performed a household survey from a convenience sample among adult community members in rural northern Haiti. We used a modified World Health Organization STEPwise approach to chronic disease questionnaire to capture self-reported data on tobacco, diet, physical activity, and diabetes, and measured blood pressure and body mass index. We used an adapted American Heart Association definition and thresholds for determining ideal, intermediate, and poor cardiovascular health. We used linear and logistic regression to examine associations between socio-demographic characteristics with CVH score and ideal CVH.

Results

Among 540 participants (mean [SD] age = 40.3 [17.1] years, 67% women), there was a high prevalence of poor CVH (n=476, 88.1%) compared with intermediate (n=56, 10.4%) and ideal (n=41, 7.6%) CVH. Ideal metrics for blood pressure (47%) and diet (26%) were least often met, while body weight (84%), physical activity (83%), and smoking (90%) were most often met. Men were associated with better CVH score (0.31, [0.04–0.59]; P=0.03), and being a farmer was associated with ideal CVH (P=0.006).

Conclusion

In this community-based sample of a farming community in rural Haiti, very few adults had ideal CVH. Higher CVH score was associated with male sex, and farming as a primary occupation. Women and non-farmers may represent at-risk subgroups within this population. Blood pressure and diet may represent possible areas for improvement.

Abstract P113: IMPACT OF ARTERIAL SITE AND PRESSURE WAVE ACQUISITION METHOD ON ARTERIAL FORM FACTOR AND MEAN AND CENTRAL ARTERIAL PRESSURE

Accurate mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement requires an integrated arterial pressure waveform but MAP is often estimated from systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP using a fixed form factor (FF, usually 0.33): MAP = DBP + FF*pulse pressure (PP), also solvable for FF if MAP is known. MAP is constant in the arterial tree but central (c) PP is lower than peripheral (p) PP, so cFF should be higher than pFF, and MAP and FF values should be similar among devices. We tested these principles for 2 transfer function-dependent devices: SphygmoCor (SPG), which generates high fidelity radial arterial tonometry waveforms and integrates MAP, and Mobil-O-Graph (MOB), a 24-hour ambulatory oscillometric brachial pulse wave analysis system that reports a proprietary MAP. SPG data were obtained after 5-10 minutes of rest and MOB values were obtained at 20 min intervals. For SPG (n =371) [mean(SD)]: pBP 140(28)/80(15) and cBP 126(28)/81(15) mmHg, age 48(20) yr, BMI 28(6.6), 54% women, 17% black. SPG-pFF was lower than cFF [0.34(.056) vs 0.44(.049), p<0.000]; SPG-pFF and cFF were correlated (r 2 = 0.23, p<0.000); and on stepwise multiple regression, pFF was related to MAP > gender > age (multiple-r 2 = 0.37, p<0.000; BMI and race excluded). For MOB (n = 157): pBP 135(18)/81(12) and cBP 123(16)/83(12) mmHg, age 59(16) yr, BMI 30(6), 52% women, 24% black. MOB-pFF was a fixed value [0.46(0.00098)] that was lower than cFF [0.57(0.048), p<0.000] and MOB-cFF was not correlated with MAP or any other characteristic. To compare SPG and MOB directly, 101 pairs were matched precisely (SPSS software) for pSBP and pDBP (130.9/78.7 mmHg for each device group); SPG-MAP was lower than MOB-MAP [96.3 vs 102.6 mmHg (p<0.000)] and SPG-cSBP was lower than MOB-cSBP [117.5 (18.0) vs 119.7(14.6), p=.015], with respective FF’s similar to the full groups. We conclude that: 1) FF varies within-subjects by arterial location and (at constant MAP) cFF > pFF; 2) SPG-pFF (but not MOB-pFF) varies between-subjects and is affected by MAP, gender, and age; 3) the proprietary MOB-pFF is fixed and much higher than traditional FF or SPG-pFF; and 4) compared to SPG, MOB overestimates MAP by about 5% and underestimates cSBP by about 2%. These findings have implications for FF methods and proprietary devices such as Mobil-O-Graph.

Abstract P116: VARIATION IN MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE (MAP) AND ITS HEMODYNAMIC COMPONENTS DURING 24-HOUR AMBULATORY PULSE WAVE ANALYSIS: IMPACT OF AGE, RACE, GENDER AND BODY SIZE

BP is highly variable within and between individuals but the impact of variation in underlying hemodynamic components is unknown. We tested the feasibility and clinical associations of quantitated variances in MAP and its hemodynamic components [heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV) and total vascular resistance (TVR)] obtained by 24-hr ambulatory pulse wave analysis (PWA, Mobil-O-Graph, IEM, Stolzberg, DE). BP and PWA were measured every 20 min for 24 hrs. Indexed to body surface area, MAP = HR*[SV index (SVI)]*[TVR index (TVRI)]; ln(MAP) = ln(HR) + ln(SVI) + ln(TVRI); and total MAP variability = var [ln(MAP)] = covariance (cov)[ln(HR), ln(MAP)] + cov[ln(SVI), ln(MAP)] + cov[ln(TVRI), ln(MAP)]. Relative contributions to var[ln(MAP)] for each hemodynamic component (as %) were calculated and associations with demographic characteristics were analyzed by correlations and t-tests. We studied 152 people (49% women, 23% black); mean(SD): # readings 57(11), age 59(16) yr, BMI 29.9(6.5) kg/m 2 , systolic BP 135(18) and MAP 106(14) mmHg. Mean(SD) 24-hr values were: ln(MAP) 4.64 (0.13), ln(HR) 4.20 (0.15), ln(SVI) -3.32 (0.15), and ln(TVRI) 3.75 (0.18). Relative contributions of hemodynamic components to total 24-hr ln(MAP) variation were: TVRI 54(36)%, HR 33(38)%, and SVI 13(40)%. The large SDs of these relative contributions led to analysis of potential contributing factors: TVRI contribution was correlated with 24-hr mean MAP (r=0.24, p=0.003) and was higher (>54%) in males (p=0.03) and blacks (p=0.04); HR contribution was inversely related to MAP (r=-0.26, p=0.001), age (r=-0.29, p=0.0003) and BMI (r=-0.173 p=0.05) and was lower (<33%) in blacks (p=0.008); SVI contribution was correlated with age (r=0.31, p<0.0001) and BMI (r=0.23, p=0.005) and was higher (>13%) in women (p=0.03). We conclude that 24-hr ambulatory PWA can identify components of MAP variation within individuals and their associations with demographic factors. The relative contributions of hemodynamic components (HR, SV, TVR) to 24-hr variability in ln(MAP) varies systematically with 24-hr mean MAP, age, race, gender, and BMI. Theoretical clinical implications may include therapeutic adjustments for extremes of variation in HR (beta-blockers), TVR (vasodilators) or SV (diuretics).

Abstract P1117: Dissimilarities Between and Carotid and Forearm Pressure-Decay and Windkessel Parameters: Implications for Circulatory Models

We studied whether: 1) the carotid and forearm diastolic pressure-decay time constants (tau) are similar and 2) the associated Windkessel (WK)-derived compliance and stiffness values are also similar and are related to arterial stiffness. Ambulatory normotensive and hypertensive subjects were studied after 30 minutes of supine rest with radial and carotid arterial tonometry (Sphygmocor), standard oscillometric cuff BP, and central (heart-femoral, hf) and peripheral (femoral-ankle, fa) pulse wave velocity (PWV, Colin VP1000). Brachial and carotid Doppler flow studies were performed in a subset. Tonograms were photo-digitized and the pressure in late diastole was modeled as an exponential decay to an asymptote A with time constant tau and start-decay time t0. [Resistance = mean pressure/flow; WK compliance = tau/resistance and WK stiffness = 1/WK compliance.] Tonometry and PWV data were available in 98 individuals; carotid and forearm blood flow in 22: (mean[SD]) age 50[20] years, weight 81[17] kg, BP 134/77[17/12] mmHg, resting HR 66[12], 38% female. Data are presented in the Table; hfPWV and faPWV were well correlated (p<0.001) but neither was correlated with carotid or forearm tau or the corresponding regional WK stiffness. We conclude that diastolic pressure decay (tau) and WK stiffness (or compliance) are not systemic indicators but rather unique regional characteristics not related to central or peripheral large artery stiffness. These findings suggest that single-WK models do not adequately represent the arterial circulation.

Abstract P177: The Dissociation of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Masks the Regulatory Role of Heart Rate in Systemic Hemodynamics

Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) are independent cardiovascular risk factors but there is little information about interactions among HR, BP, and systemic hemodynamics throughout the day. We performed 24-hour ambulatory pulse wave analysis (Mobil-O-Graph, IEM, Stolberg, DE) with measurements at 20 minute intervals. Variables measured were: systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP), HR, oscillometric pulse wave velocity (oPWV), stroke volume index (SVI), and total vascular resistance index (TVRI). We also performed regression analyses within-subjects to determine the slopes of the SVI-HR and TVRI-HR relationships within individuals and for the group. We studied 89 individuals (mean age 61 years, weight 84 kg, BP 138/82 mm Hg (38 normal or controlled BP, 51 uncontrolled BP), resting HR 69 beats/min (bpm), 36% non-white, 64% female); 24-hour mean HR was not correlated with corresponding SBP or DBP values (r= -0.013 and r= 0.154, pNS, respectively) and this dissociation persisted in corresponding day-time vs. night-time comparisons and subgroup stratification by BP control status, age, and gender. In contrast, 24-hour mean HR was strongly correlated with 24-hour mean cardiac index (r=0.629, p<0.000) but strongly inversely related to mean 24-hour SVI and TVRI (r= -0.508 and r= -0.505, p<0.000 each); each 10 beat/min change in mean HR was associated with a 2.3 mL/m 2 (6%) change in SVI and a corresponding 6% change in TVRI. Analysis of individual 24-hour studies also revealed no correlations between HR and BP but the within-individual slopes and correlation coefficients between HR and SVI or TVRI were more variable; higher oPWV (which correlated with the SD of SBP, p=.01) was associated with a lesser sensitivity of SVI to HR change and a greater sensitivity of TVRI to HR change (p<0.001 each) independent of age, gender, or BP. We conclude that BP is normally independent of HR, which plays a hidden but important regulatory role in the underlying systemic hemodynamics between and within individuals. The clinical impact of differential sensitivity of systemic hemodynamics to HR change is not established but people with stiffer arteries display diminished SVI sensitivity and greater TVRI sensitivity to HR change, which may contribute to their greater SBP variability.

Maintenance of long-term blood pressure control and vascular health by low-dose amiloride-based therapy in hyperaldosteronism

Whether aldosterone itself contributes directly to macro- or microcirculatory disease in man or to adverse cardiovascular outcomes is not fully known. We report our long-term single-practice experience in an unusual group of five patients with chronic hyperaldosteronism (HA, including three with glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism, GRA) treated with low-dose amiloride (a specific epithelial sodium channel [ENaC] blocker) 5-10 (mean 7) mg daily for 14-28 (mean 20) years. Except for one GRA diagnosed in infancy, all had severe resistant hypertension. In each case, BP was normalized within 1-4 weeks after starting amiloride and office BP's remained well controlled throughout the next two decades. 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring with pulse wave analysis (cardiac output, vascular resistance, augmentation index, reflection magnitude), regional pulse wave velocities, pulse stiffening ratio, ankle-brachial index, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and spot urinary albumin:creatinine ratio were measured after a mean of 18 years; all of these indicators were essentially normal. Over two additional years of observation (100 patient-years total), no cardiovascular or renal event occurred. We conclude that long-term ENaC blockade with amiloride can normalize BP and protect macro- and microvascular function in patients with HA. This suggests that either (a) putative vasculopathic effects of aldosterone are mediated via ENaC or (b) aldosterone may not play a direct role in age-dependent vasculopathic changes in humans independent of blood pressure. These findings, coupled with our literature review in both animal and human results, underscore the need for additional studies.

Long-term BP control and vascular health in patients with hyperaldosteronism treated with low-dose, amiloride-based therapy

Whether aldosterone itself contributes directly to macro- or microcirculatory disease in man or to adverse cardiovascular outcomes is not fully known. We report our long-term single-practice experience in 5 patients with chronic hyperaldosteronism (HA, including 3 with glucocorticoid remediable aldosteronism, GRA) treated with low-dose amiloride (a specific epithelial sodium channel [ENaC] blocker) 5-10 (mean 7) mg daily for 14-28 (mean 20) years. Except for 1 GRA diagnosed in infancy, all had severe resistant hypertension. In each case, BP was normal or near-normal within 1-4 weeks after starting amiloride and office BP's were well controlled for 20 years thereafter. Vascular studies and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring with pulse wave analysis (cardiac output, vascular resistance, augmentation index, and reflection magnitude) were assessed after a mean of 18 years as were regional pulse wave velocities, pulse stiffening ratio, ankle-brachial index, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and spot urinary albumin:creatinine ratio. All indicators were completely normal in all patients after 18 years of amiloride, and none had a cardiovascular event during the 20-year mean follow-up. We conclude that long-term ENaC blockade can normalize BP and protect macro- and microvascular function in patients with HA. This suggests that (a) any vasculopathic effects of aldosterone are mediated via ENaC, not MR activation itself, and are fully preventable or reversible with ENaC blockade or (b) aldosterone may not play a major BP-independent role in human macro- and microcirculatory diseases. These and other widely divergent results in the literature underscore the need for additional studies regarding aldosterone, ENaC, and vascular disease.

Pulse Wave Velocities Derived From Cuff Ambulatory Pulse Wave Analysis

Pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of arterial stiffness, is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We investigated the relationship of ambulatory brachial cuff-based oscillometric PWV (oPWV) to 2 known correlates: age and brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP). In 234 participants in the Masked Hypertension Study, we analyzed 7284 validated hourly ambulatory SBP and oPWV readings using the Mobil-O-Graph monitor, which uses a proprietary pulse wave analysis algorithm to determine oPWV. Carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) was also measured. Mixed linear models were developed to estimate oPWV from age and ambulatory SBP. Participants were 34% male, with mean (SD) age 52.8 (9.9) years, SBP 123.8 (18.4) mm Hg, and oPWV 7.6 (1.3) m/s and cfPWV of 7.7 (1.7) m/s. The relationship of oPWV to age and SBP is given below: [Formula: see text] Age uniquely accounted for an estimated 75% of the total variation of oPWV, whereas SBP uniquely accounted for 20%; these findings were confirmed in an external validation dataset. Together, age and SBP accounted for 99.1% of the total variance of oPWV but (only) 40.2% of the variance of cfPWV. The correlation between oPWV and cfPWV was 0.58 but was only 0.11 after controlling for age and SBP. We conclude that the Mobil-O-Graph's oPWV is nearly completely explained by age and SBP and its relationship to cfPWV is because of their shared associations with age and SBP. Other hemodynamic variables derived from oscillometric pulse wave analysis may be useful and deserve additional scrutiny.

Arterial Stiffness: Going a Step Beyond

Interest in arterial stiffness has been fueled by the scientific and clinical implications of its "vicious cycle" relationship with aging and systolic blood pressure. In physical terms, stiffness is the slope of the relationship between an artery's distending pressure and its cross-sectional area or volume. Pulse wave velocity (PWV, in m/s), the most common arterial stiffness indicator, is usually measured by the foot-to-foot time and distance method and is proportional to [stiffness × area (or volume)]1/2 at a given pressure. Its intrinsic pressure dependency and other flaws in current PWV methods limit its utility. In contrast, the arterial stiffness-arterial pressure relationship is near-linear, with a slope β, the exponent of the curvilinear arterial pressure-arterial volume relationship. The concept of arterial stiffening is related to β and describes a more functionally relevant aspect of arterial behavior: the change in stiffness for a given change in pressure. Arterial stiffening can be estimated from the variability of within-individual BP measurements (24-h ambulatory, home BP, or BP measured at different arm heights) and can be expressed as the pulse stiffening ratio (PSR) = [systolic stiffness]/[diastolic stiffness] or the ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI or its symmetric form, sAASI). High arterial stiffness (PWV) and stiffening (β, stiffness index, cardio-ankle vascular index, AASI, and PSR) are associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk, but it remains unclear whether these indicators are useful in improving medical care quality; the standard of care remains stringent BP control.

Diameter, pressure and compliance relationships in dorsal hand veins

The diameter-pressure characteristics of dorsal hand veins previously have not been characterized. In this study, the effects of distending pressure with and without infused norepinephrine on diameter and compliance were observed. The elevation needed for venous collapse was measured, and the effects of baseline constriction on venous reactivity were assessed. In seven supine subjects, a brachial cuff on an elevated arm was used to generate distending pressures while a linear variable displacement transformer (LVDT) measured changes in venous diameter. Arctangent functions of distending pressure were fitted to the normalized diameter, then compliance functions were calculated. In supine subjects, 5-15 cm of elevation emptied dorsal hand veins. Norepinephrine decreased the venous diameter at any distending pressure by increasing the P50 without significantly changing the midpoint slope. Compliance was a nearly single-valued function of the normalized diameter with a maximum value at about 60% distention. Reactivity depends on distending pressure and baseline P50. Percentage constriction is a function of initial and final P50 and of distending pressure.

Hypertension and aging in rural Haiti: results from a preliminary survey

Cross-sectional studies in the developed countries document strong relationships among age, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP). There is little information about these trends and their impact in underdeveloped countries with different socioeconomic and lifestyle characteristics. We studied a convenience sample of 572 residents of rural Fontaine, Haiti: 193 males and 379 females (mean, s.d.) age 40.2 (17.1) years and performed intake questionnaires and BP measurements in participants' homes. Income and educational achievement were very low but most-recommended lifestyle factors were very favorable: very high physical activity, low dietary fat, virtually no obesity (body mass index 21.8 (4.9)), and low smoking prevalence. Rough estimates of salt intake were high (~13 g per day) as was the overall prevalence of hypertension: 34.4% (23.4% in males, 40.2% in females). SBP and PP were related closely to age (r²=0.28, P<0.001 and r²=0.22, P<0.001); for each decade of age, SBP increased by 7.6 mm Hg. Diastolic BP peaked in the 6th decade (polynomial r²=0.22, P<0.001) and the nadir of PP occurred in the 3rd decade. We conclude that, despite a favorable profile of lifestyle characteristics and no obesity, the prevalence of hypertension and rate of increase in SBP and PP with age in Haiti are at least as high as those of developed countries.

Renal denervation for human hypertension: is there a future?

The sympathetic nervous system plays a permissive, if not primary causal role in the genesis and maintenance of human essential hypertension. Excessive sympathetic nervous system activity in man is most apparent in early forms of hypertension (prehypertension and white-coat type). Renal nerves are of particular interest because of their roles in modulating the activity of the renin-angiotensin system and renal sodium excretion. Renal denervation substantially ameliorates the development of hypertension in animal models such as renovascular, spontaneously hypertensive, and steroid-induced hypertension in rats and aortic coarctation in dogs. In man, catheter ablation of renal nerves has been undertaken in the late phases of hypertension; in a rigorously controlled trial in resistant hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN-3), renal denervation did not reduce blood pressure over the long term. Is this because renal denervation is more appropriate to prevent than treat late-stage hypertension? Are there anatomical or technical barriers yet to be overcome in the procedure? These and other issues are addressed by two experts in this issue of the controversies series: Deepak L. Bhatt and Murray Epstein.

Ambulatory 24-hour cardiac oxygen consumption and blood pressure-heart rate variability: effects of nebivolol and valsartan alone and in combination

We compared an angiotensin receptor blocker (valsartan; VAL), a beta-blocker (nebivolol; NEB) and the combination of NEB/VAL with respect to 24-hour myocardial oxygen consumption (determined by 24-hour ambulatory heart rate-central systolic pressure product [ACRPP]) and its components. Subjects with hypertension (systolic blood pressure >140 or diastolic blood pressure >90; n = 26) were studied in a double-blinded, double-dummy, forced-titration, crossover design with 3 random-order experimental periods: VAL 320 mg, NEB 40 mg, and NEB/VAL 320/40 mg daily. After 4 weeks of each drug, ambulatory pulse wave analysis (MobilOGraph) was performed every 20 minutes for 24 hours. All three treatments resulted in nearly identical brachial and central systolic blood pressures. NEB alone or in combination with VAL resulted in lower ACRPP (by 11%-14%; P < .001 each) and heart rate (by 18%-20%; P < .001 each) compared with VAL, but stroke work (ACRPP per beat) was lower with VAL. Relative and adjusted variability (standard deviation and coefficient of variation) of heart rate were also lower with NEB and NEB/VAL than VAL. Results in African Americans, the majority subpopulation, were similar to those of the entire treatment group. We conclude that the rate-slowing effects of NEB cause ambulatory cardiac myocardial oxygen consumption to be lower with NEB monotherapy or NEB/VAL combination therapy than with VAL monotherapy. NEB/VAL is not superior to NEB alone in controlling heart rate, blood pressure, or ACRPP. Heart rate variability but not ACRPP variability is reduced by NEB or the combination NEB/VAL. There is no attenuation of beta-blocker-induced rate-slowing effects of in African Americans.

Brachial vs. central systolic pressure and pulse wave transmission indicators: a critical analysis

This critique is intended to provide background for the reader to evaluate the relative clinical utilities of brachial cuff systolic blood pressure (SBP) and its derivatives, including pulse pressure, central systolic pressure, central augmentation index (AI), and pulse pressure amplification (PPA). The critical question is whether the newer indicators add sufficient information to justify replacing or augmenting brachial cuff blood pressure (BP) data in research and patient care. Historical context, pathophysiology of variations in pulse wave transmission and reflection, issues related to measurement and model errors, statistical limitations, and clinical correlations are presented, along with new comparative data. Based on this overview, there is no compelling scientific or practical reason to replace cuff SBP with any of the newer indicators in the vast majority of clinical situations. Supplemental value for central SBP may exist in defining patients with exaggerated PPA ("spurious systolic hypertension"), managing cardiac and aortic diseases, and in studies of cardiovascular drugs, but there are no current standards for these possibilities.

Triple-combination treatment with olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine/ hydrochlorothiazide in Hispanic/Latino patients with hypertension: the TRINITY study

OBJECTIVE(S)

Evaluate efficacy/safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM)/amlodipine (AML)/ hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in Hispanic/Latino adults with hypertension.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, 12-week, parallel-group study followed by a 40-week open-label extension phase.

SETTING

Clinical sites (317) in the United States and Puerto Rico.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Individuals > or =18 years of age with mean seated blood pressure (BP) > or =140/100 or > or =160/90 mm Hg divided into Hispanic/Latino (369) and non-Hispanic/Latino (2122) subgroups.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to OM 40/AML 10 mg, OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg, or OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg during the double-blind phase. During the open-label extension, all participants received OM 40/AML 5/HCTZ 12.5 mg; participants not reaching BP goal within 2 weeks were randomly titrated to OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 12.5 mg or OM 40/AML 5/HCTZ 25 mg, then to OM 40/AML 10/ HCTZ 25 mg after another 2 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Change in mean seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) from baseline (double-blind phase).

RESULTS

Triple-drug therapy vs the dual therapies resulted in greater mean reduction in SeBP (Hispanic/Latino: 35.0/20.9 mm Hg vs 27.8-30.9/15.3-17.7 mm Hg; non-Hispanic/Latino: 39.0/21.7 mm Hg vs 28.9-31.5/14.6-17.8 mm Hg) and enabled more participants to reach BP goal (Hispanic/Latino: 56.8% vs 40.6%-51.2%; non-Hispanic/Latino: 65.7% vs 33.8%-46.6%) irrespective of ethnicity. The efficacy of triple-drug therapy in achieving BP goal was sustained long-term (40-week open-label extension period) in Hispanic/Latino (63.3%) and non-Hispanic/ Latino (64.2%) participants. Triple-drug therapy was well tolerated in Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino participants.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, OM/AML/HCTZ was an effective treatment option in Hispanic/ Latino patients with hypertension.

Combined olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide therapy in randomized patients with hypertension: a subgroup analysis of the TRINITY study by age

Background

Hypertension is often inadequately controlled in older people.

Objective

This prespecified subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of an olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg/amlodipine besylate (AML) 10 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg triple-combination treatment compared with the 3 components as dual-combination treatments in participants with hypertension who were <65 and ≥65 years of age. Within the ≥65 years of age subgroup, efficacy and safety were also summarized for participants ≥75 years of age.

Study design

12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.

Setting

317 ambulatory care sites in the US and Puerto Rico.

Participants

Individuals ≥18 years of age with mean seated blood pressure (SeBP) ≥140/100 or ≥160/90 mmHg off antihypertensive medication on 2 consecutive clinic visits with no recent history of significant cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV), severe renal insufficiency, or uncontrolled diabetes (HbA_1c >9 %).

Intervention

Participants were randomized, stratified by age, diabetes status, and race to one of four treatment assignments: OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg, OM 40/AML 10 mg, OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, or AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg.

Main Outcome Measure

Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) at week 12 (last observation carried forward) in each age subgroup (prespecified analysis).

Results

Of the 2492 randomized participants in the study (total cohort), 2021 (81.1 %) were <65 and 471 (18.9 %) were ≥65 years of age, including 79 (3.2 %) who were ≥75 years of age. OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg triple-combination treatment resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LS mean SeDBP at week 12 than dual-combination component treatments in participants in both cohorts: <65 years (21.0 vs. 14.2–17.2 mmHg; p < 0.0001) and ≥65 years (23.7 vs. 17.3–20.0 mmHg; p ≤ 0.002). Similarly, triple-combination treatment resulted in a greater reduction in LS mean seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) at week 12 than dual-combination component treatments: <65 years (38.2 vs. 28.3–31.4 mmHg; p < 0.0001) and ≥65 years (39.2 vs. 29.3–31.1 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Triple-combination treatment was more effective than dual-combination treatments in enabling participants to reach SeBP goal (<140/90 mmHg [<130/80 mmHg in participants with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or chronic cardiovascular disease]) in both age subgroups (<65 years: 65 vs. 34–50 %, respectively, p < 0.0001 and ≥65 years: 63 vs. 32–39 %; p ≤ 0.0004). All 4 treatments were safe and well tolerated with low discontinuation rates in both age subgroups. There were no clinically relevant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events between participants <65 and ≥65 years of age receiving triple-combination treatment.

Conclusion

Triple-combination treatment with OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg was well tolerated and more effective in lowering BP than the component dual-combination treatments in elderly and non-elderly subgroups.

Olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in participants with hypertension and diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or chronic cardiovascular disease: a subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group TRINITY study

BACKGROUND

Patients with hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, or chronic kidney disease (CKD) usually require two or more antihypertensive agents to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals.

METHODS

The efficacy/safety of olmesartan (OM) 40 mg, amlodipine besylate (AML) 10 mg, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg versus the component dual-combinations (OM 40/AML 10 mg, OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, and AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg) was evaluated in participants with diabetes, CKD, or chronic CVD in the Triple Therapy with Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients Study (TRINITY). The primary efficacy end point was least squares (LS) mean reduction from baseline in seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) at week 12. Secondary end points included LS mean reduction in SeSBP and proportion of participants achieving BP goal (<130/80 mm Hg) at week 12 (double-blind randomized period), and LS mean reduction in SeBP and BP goal achievement at week 52/early termination (open-label period).

RESULTS

At week 12, OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg resulted in significantly greater SeBP reductions in participants with diabetes (-37.9/22.0 mm Hg vs -28.0/17.6 mm Hg for OM 40/AML 10 mg, -26.4/14.7 mm Hg for OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, and -27.6/14.8 mm Hg for AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg), CKD (-44.3/25.5 mm Hg vs -39.5/23.8 mm Hg for OM 40/AML 10 mg, -25.3/17.0 mm Hg for OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, and -33.4/20.6 mm Hg for AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg), and chronic CVD (-37.8/20.6 mm Hg vs -31.7/18.2 mm Hg for OM 40/AML 10 mg, -30.9/17.1 mm Hg for OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, and -27.5/16.1 mm Hg for AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg) (P<0.05 for all subgroups vs dual-component treatments). BP goal achievement was greater for participants receiving triple-combination treatment compared with the dual-combination treatments, and was achieved in 41.1%, 55.0%, and 38.9% of participants with diabetes, CKD, and chronic CVD on OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg, respectively. At week 52, there was sustained BP lowering with the OM/AML/HCTZ regimen. Overall, the triple combination was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with diabetes, CKD, or chronic CVD, short-term (12 weeks) and long-term treatment with OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg was well tolerated, lowered BP more effectively, and enabled more participants to reach BP goal than the corresponding 2-component regimens. TRIAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: NCT00649389.

Home and clinic blood pressure responses in elderly individuals with systolic hypertension

Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring may enhance assessment of BP control. In this 16-week study, men and women 70 years or older with systolic BP between 150 and 200 mm Hg were randomized to receive valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (V/HCTZ) 160/12.5 mg (n = 128), HCTZ 12.5 mg (n = 128), or V 160 mg (n = 128) for 4 weeks. Participants whose BP was 140/90 mm Hg or higher at weeks 4, 8, or 12 were uptitrated to a maximum of V/HCTZ 320/25 mg. Participants were evaluated by home BP monitoring using an automated device weekly before taking daily study medication (n = 301). Baseline BP ± SD for clinic (165.5 ± 11.8/85.1 ± 9.5 mm Hg) was approximately 3/1 mm Hg greater than home readings (162.5 ± 15.8/84.3 ± 10.2 mm Hg). Reductions in BP ± SEM at week 4 were similar for clinic (12.6 ± 1.0/4.7 ± 0.5 mm Hg) and home (10.9 ± 1.1/3.8 ± 0.5 mm Hg) readings (P = .25/P = .23; clinic versus home); differences between V/HCTZ and HCTZ or V were also similar for both home and clinic readings and results by either technique correlated significantly (P < .0001). Home BP measurements confirm that treatment initiated with V/HCTZ versus monotherapy resulted in greater antihypertensive efficacy. Home BP monitoring, if done with proper technique, provides a reliable indicator of BP control in elderly patients and may help guide drug dosing and titration.

Triple-Combination therapy with olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in black and non-black study participants with hypertension: the TRINITY randomized, double-blind, 12-week, parallel-group study

BACKGROUND

Although awareness of hypertension in Black patients has increased, blood pressure (BP) is frequently inadequately controlled.

OBJECTIVE

This prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRINITY study evaluated the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, amlodipine besylate (AML) 10 mg, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg triple-combination treatment compared with the component dual-combination treatments in Black and non-Black study participants.

STUDY DESIGN

TRINITY was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation. The first patient was enrolled in May 2008 and the last patient completed the study in February 2009. The study consisted of a 3-week washout period for participants receiving antihypertensive therapy and a 12-week double-blind treatment period. For the treatment phase, all study participants were stratified by age, race, and diabetes mellitus status and randomized to a treatment sequence that led to their final treatment assignment, which they received from weeks 4 to 12 (OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg, OM 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, or AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg). In the first 2 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, all participants received either dual-combination treatment or placebo. Participants assigned to dual-combination treatment continued treatment until week 4, and participants receiving placebo were switched at week 2 to receive one of the dual-combination treatments until week 4. At week 4, participants either continued dual-combination treatment or randomly received triple-combination treatment until week 12.

SETTING

317 clinical sites in the USA and Puerto Rico were included in the study.

PATIENTS

Study participants eligible for randomization (N = 2492) were ≥18 years of age with mean seated blood pressure (SeBP) ≥140/100 mmHg or ≥160/90 mmHg (off antihypertensive medication).

INTERVENTION

The intervention was with dual- or triple-combination antihypertensive treatment: OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg, OM 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, or AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary efficacy variable was the change in least squares (LS) mean seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) from baseline to week 12. Secondary efficacy variables included the LS mean change in seated systolic BP (SeSBP), percentage of study participants reaching BP goal, and safety parameters.

RESULTS

In both Black and non-Black participants, triple-combination treatment resulted in significant and similar mean reductions in SeDBP and SeSBP (p ≤ 0.0001 vs each dual-combination treatment) with a greater proportion of participants reaching BP goal compared with dual-combination treatments, regardless of race. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and no new safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSION

Triple-combination treatment provided greater BP reductions than dual-combination treatments regardless of race.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00649389.

Long-term efficacy and safety of triple-combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate and hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012;14:149-157. ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Most patients with hypertension require combination therapy in order to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals. This 40-week open-label extension of the 12-week double-blind Triple Therapy With Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients Study (TRINITY) evaluated the efficacy and safety of triple-combination treatments with olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine besylate, and hydrochlorothiazide (OM/AML/HCTZ) in 2112 participants with moderate to severe hypertension. Following 2 weeks of initial treatment with OM 40/AML 5/HCTZ 12.5 mg, participants not achieving BP goal were titrated to OM 40/AML 5/HCTZ 25 mg or OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 12.5 mg on a randomized basis. At week 16, participants who did not achieve BP goal were further titrated to OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg. At the end of the study, 44.5% to 79.8% of participants reached BP goal and the mean BP decreased from 168.6/100.7 mm Hg (baseline BP at randomization) to 125.0 to 136.8 mm Hg/77.8 to 82.5 mm Hg, depending on treatment. Long-term treatment with OM/AML/HCTZ was well tolerated and effective with no new safety concerns.

Efficacy and safety of triple-combination therapy with olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in study participants with hypertension and diabetes: a subpopulation analysis of the TRINITY study

BACKGROUND

Most patients with hypertension and diabetes require two or more antihypertensive agents to achieve the recommended blood pressure (BP) goal of <130/80 mm Hg. This prespecified subgroup analysis from the TRIple Therapy with Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide in HyperteNsIve PatienTs StudY assessed the efficacy and safety of triple-combination treatment (olmesartan medoxomil 40/amlodipine besylate 10/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg) versus the component dual-combination treatments according to diabetes status (diabetes; non-diabetes).

METHODS

Participants received dual-combination treatment for 4 weeks or placebo for 2 weeks. Participants receiving placebo switched to dual-combination treatment from week 2 to week 4. At week 4, participants switched to triple-combination treatment or continued on dual-combination treatment until week 12.

RESULTS

The prespecified changes in BP from baseline for the diabetes subgroup receiving triple-combination treatment were greater than the respective dual-combination treatments (P ≤ .0013). Also, more participants with diabetes receiving triple-combination treatment reached BP goal (<130/80 mm Hg) versus those receiving dual-combination treatments (P ≤ .0092). In a post hoc analysis, significantly greater proportions of study participants with diabetes achieved BP targets with triple-combination treatment compared with each dual-combination treatment. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

In participants with hypertension and diabetes, triple-combination treatment led to greater BP reductions and enabled greater proportions of participants to reach BP goal versus the dual-combination treatments. Triple-combination treatment was well tolerated in both diabetes and non-diabetes subgroups.

Comparative efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine and amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension and obesity or metabolic syndrome

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a common link between hypertension and comorbidities of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). We evaluated the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the combination direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, with amlodipine versus amlodipine alone in self-identified African Americans with stage 2 hypertension in a subgroup of patients with obesity or MetS participating in the Aliskiren Amlodipine Combination in African AmEricans with Stage 2 HypertenSion (AACESS) trial. Subjects, newly diagnosed and treatment naive or taking three or fewer antihypertensive drugs with a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) of 160-199 mm Hg were randomized to receive aliskiren/amlodipine 150/5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week; force-titrated to aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg or amlodipine 10 mg, for an additional 7 weeks. Overall, 292 obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2)) and 197 MetS subjects had baseline msSBP ranging from 167.0 to 167.5 mm Hg. Least-square mean reductions from baseline to 8 weeks in msSBP, the primary efficacy variable, were significantly higher with aliskiren/amlodipine than with amlodipine in both obese (-33.7 mm Hg vs. -27.9 mm Hg; P < .001) and MetS subjects (-36.4 mm Hg vs. -28.5 mm Hg; P < .001). Both treatments were well tolerated. Aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg is more effective than amlodipine 10 mg in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension and obesity or MetS.

Benefits of antihypertensive drugs when blood pressure is below 140/90 mmHg

Antihypertensive medications are used to lower blood pressure (BP) but, ultimately, their true value lies in reductions in morbidity and mortality (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal diseases). Hypertension is defined discreetly (generally 140/90 mmHg) but the actual relationship between BP and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular outcomes is continuous. Observational studies have demonstrated a powerful log-linear relationship between BP and mortality due to ischemic heart disease (IHD) or stroke over the range of 115/75 to 185/115 mmHg. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have clearly demonstrated benefits of antihypertensive drugs in nonhypertensive individuals: delay or prevention of the onset of hypertension and microalbuminuria and reduced morbidity and mortality from IHD, stroke, and chronic kidney disease. This is not surprising given that various antihypertensive drug classes have multiple potential beneficial effects. A persistent concern is that overtreatment of hypertension may increase risk in individuals with coronary artery disease, but a "J-curve" effect is not consistently found in clinical studies. The use of antihypertensive drugs in at-risk individuals who are below the traditional threshold (140/90 mmHg) is fully justifiable, but the decision requires adequate clinical experience and judgment and a full assessment of risks and benefits.

Combined aliskiren-amlodipine treatment for hypertension in African Americans: clinical science and management issues

While it may seem at first that antihypertensive drug combinations run counter to the desire to 'personalize' the management of hypertension, the best combinations have predictable efficacy in different individuals and subpopulations. Race is probably not a valid surrogate for clinically meaningful genetic variation or guide to therapy. Most guidelines suggest similar blood pressure goals for different races but drug treatment recommendations have diverged. In the United States, race is not considered to be a major factor in drug choice, but in England and other countries, initial therapy with renin-angiotensin system blocking drugs is not recommended in Blacks. In this review we: (1) examine new trends in race-based research; (2) emphasize the weaknesses of race-based treatment recommendations; and (3) explore the effects of a new combination, renin inhibition (aliskiren) and amlodipine, in African Americans.

Value of Angiotensin receptor blocker therapy in diabetes

There are more clinical trials investigating angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in diabetes than any other drug class, ranging from early "prevention" trials to the treatment of individuals with advanced organ damage. In its earliest manifestations, visceral adiposity predisposes to hypertension and hyperglycemia (metabolic syndrome). In these individuals, ARB therapy delays the progression to chronic hypertension and may also delay the progression to overt diabetes. Based on the increased cardiovascular disease risk of the metabolic syndrome, which is similar to stage 1 hypertension, both lifestyle modification and ARB therapy are justifiable. ARB therapy has also been found to delay the onset of microalbuminuria and retinopathy. In established diabetic nephropathy, ARB therapy is recommended as a standard alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition to reduce macroalbuminuria and delay the progression to end-stage disease. Finally, large trials in ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and stroke have demonstrated clear benefits of ARB therapy. Because ARBs have side effect rates equal to placebo and far lower than any other antihypertensive drug class, the benefit/risk ratio is highly favorable across the entire spectrum of diabetic disease. Thus, ARB therapy is a highly attractive alternative for individuals at any stage of diabetes and with any pattern of complications.

Olmesartan for the delay or prevention of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Microalbuminuria is an early predictor of diabetic nephropathy and premature cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether treatment with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) would delay or prevent the occurrence of microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial, we assigned 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes to receive olmesartan (at a dose of 40 mg once daily) or placebo for a median of 3.2 years. Additional antihypertensive drugs (except angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or ARBs) were used as needed to lower blood pressure to less than 130/80 mm Hg. The primary outcome was the time to the first onset of microalbuminuria. The times to the onset of renal and cardiovascular events were analyzed as secondary end points.

RESULTS

The target blood pressure (<130/80 mm Hg) was achieved in nearly 80% of the patients taking olmesartan and 71% taking placebo; blood pressure measured in the clinic was lower by 3.1/1.9 mm Hg in the olmesartan group than in the placebo group. Microalbuminuria developed in 8.2% of the patients in the olmesartan group (178 of 2160 patients who could be evaluated) and 9.8% in the placebo group (210 of 2139); the time to the onset of microalbuminuria was increased by 23% with olmesartan (hazard ratio for onset of microalbuminuria, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.94; P=0.01). The serum creatinine level doubled in 1% of the patients in each group. Slightly fewer patients in the olmesartan group than in the placebo group had nonfatal cardiovascular events--81 of 2232 patients (3.6%) as compared with 91 of 2215 patients (4.1%) (P=0.37)--but a greater number had fatal cardiovascular events--15 patients (0.7%) as compared with 3 patients (0.1%) (P=0.01), a difference that was attributable in part to a higher rate of death from cardiovascular causes in the olmesartan group than in the placebo group among patients with preexisting coronary heart disease (11 of 564 patients [2.0%] vs. 1 of 540 [0.2%], P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Olmesartan was associated with a delayed onset of microalbuminuria, even though blood-pressure control in both groups was excellent according to current standards. The higher rate of fatal cardiovascular events with olmesartan among patients with preexisting coronary heart disease is of concern. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00185159.).

ASH position paper: dietary approaches to lower blood pressure

A substantial body of evidence has implicated several aspects of diet in the pathogenesis of elevated blood pressure (BP). Well-established risk factors for elevated BP include excess salt intake, low potassium intake, excess weight, high alcohol consumption, and suboptimal dietary pattern. African Americans are especially sensitive to the BP-raising effects of excess salt intake, insufficient potassium intake, and suboptimal diet. In this setting, dietary changes have the potential to substantially reduce racial disparities in BP and its consequences. In view of the age-related rise in BP in both children and adults, the direct, progressive relationship of BP with cardiovascular-renal diseases throughout the usual range of BP, and the worldwide epidemic of BP-related disease, efforts to reduce BP in nonhypertensive as well as hypertensive individuals are warranted. In nonhypertensives, dietary changes can lower BP and delay, if not prevent, hypertension. In uncomplicated stage I hypertension, dietary changes serve as initial treatment before drug therapy. In hypertensive individuals already on drug therapy, lifestyle modifications can further lower BP. The current challenge is designing and implementing effective clinical and public health interventions that lead to sustained dietary changes among individuals and more broadly in the general population.

ASH Position Paper: Dietary approaches to lower blood pressure

A substantial body of evidence has implicated several aspects of diet in the pathogenesis of elevated blood pressure (BP). Well-established risk factors for elevated BP include excess salt intake, low potassium intake, excess weight, high alcohol consumption, and suboptimal dietary pattern. African Americans are especially sensitive to the BP-raising effects of excess salt intake, insufficient potassium intake, and suboptimal diet. In this setting, dietary changes have the potential to substantially reduce racial disparities in BP and its consequences. In view of the age-related rise in BP in both children and adults, the direct, progressive relationship of BP with cardiovascular-renal diseases throughout the usual range of BP, and the worldwide epidemic of BP-related disease, efforts to reduce BP in nonhypertensive as well as hypertensive individuals are warranted. In nonhypertensives, dietary changes can lower BP and delay, if not prevent, hypertension. In uncomplicated stage I hypertension, dietary changes serve as initial treatment before drug therapy. In hypertensive individuals already on drug therapy, lifestyle modifications can further lower BP. The current challenge is designing and implementing effective clinical and public health interventions that lead to sustained dietary changes among individuals and more broadly in the general population.