Adjuvant platinum versus capecitabine for residual, invasive, triple-negative breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a better tool for evaluating the experiences of patients who have symptomatic, treatment-associated adverse events (AEs) compared with clinician-rated AEs. The authors present PROs assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment-related neurotoxicity for adjuvant capecitabine versus platinum on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) EA1131 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02445391).

METHODS

Participants completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale (platinum arm only) at baseline, cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), 6 months, and 15 months. Because of early termination, power was insufficient to test the hypothesis that HRQoL, as assessed by the NFBSI-16 treatment side-effect (TSE) subscale, would be better at 6 and 15 months in the capecitabine arm; all analyses were exploratory. Means were compared by using t-tests or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and proportions were compared by using the χ2 test.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-six of 330 eligible patients provided PROs. The mean NFBSI-16 TSE subscale score was lower for the platinum arm at baseline (p = .02; absolute difference, 0.6 points) and for the capecitabine arm at C3D1 (p = .04; absolute difference, 0.5 points), but it did not differ at other times. The mean change in TSE subscale scores differed between the arms from baseline to C3D1 (platinum arm, 0.15; capecitabine arm, -0.72; p = .03), but not from baseline to later time points. The mean decline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale scores exceeded the minimal meaningful change (1.38 points) from baseline to each subsequent time point (all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the similar frequency of clinician-rated AEs, PROs identified greater on-treatment symptom burden with capecitabine and complemented clinician-rated AEs by characterizing patients' experiences during chemotherapy.

Incorporation of emergent symptoms and genetic covariates improves prediction of aromatase inhibitor therapy discontinuation

Objectives

Early discontinuation is common among breast cancer patients taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Although several predictors have been identified, it is unclear how to simultaneously consider multiple risk factors for an individual. We sought to develop a tool for prediction of AI discontinuation and to explore how predictive value of risk factors changes with time.

Materials and Methods

Survival machine learning was used to predict time-to-discontinuation of AIs in 181 women who enrolled in a prospective cohort. Models were evaluated via time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), c-index, and integrated Brier score. Feature importance was analysis was conducted via Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and time-dependence of their predictive value was analyzed by time-dependent AUC. Personalized survival curves were constructed for risk communication.

Results

The best-performing model incorporated genetic risk factors and changes in patient-reported outcomes, achieving mean time-dependent AUC of 0.66, and AUC of 0.72 and 0.67 at 6- and 12-month cutoffs, respectively. The most significant features included variants in ESR1 and emergent symptoms. Predictive value of genetic risk factors was highest in the first year of treatment. Decrease in physical function was the strongest independent predictor at follow-up.

Discussion and Conclusion

Incorporation of genomic and 3-month follow-up data improved the ability of the models to identify the individuals at risk of AI discontinuation. Genetic risk factors were particularly important for predicting early discontinuers. This study provides insight into the complex nature of AI discontinuation and highlights the importance of incorporating genetic risk factors and emergent symptoms into prediction models.

Rethinking, reducing, and refining the classical oral tyramine challenge test of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors

The oral tyramine challenge evaluates the safety of novel monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors when taken with tyramine-containing food or drinks. In its current design, it comprises an extensive series of tyramine escalation steps until a blood pressure threshold is met. Due to the high variation in tyramine bioavailability, and thereby in blood pressure effect, this classical design has various limitations, including safety concerns. Based on data from a previously performed tyramine challenge study, the present study explored a reduced new design that escalates up to 400 mg, and evaluates the dose to a tyramine peak plasma concentration of ≥10 ng/mL, instead of a dose up to 800 mg, and to a blood pressure change of ≥30 mm Hg. Tested by trial simulation, the new design proves more efficient than the classical design in terms of better identifying tyramine sensitivity of test and reference treatments and reducing false-positive and false-negative rates in estimating tyramine sensitivity by more than 10-fold. Since it escalates over a lower tyramine dose range, the new design reduces risk to subjects associated with tyramine-induced blood pressure excursions, is less demanding for study participants, and is more efficient. By its focus on tyramine bioavailability as the primary concern for novel MAO inhibitors, the new tyramine challenge study provides better answers in a simplified and safer design compared with the classical design in trial simulation, warranting its use in future clinical studies.

Kappa opioid activation changes protein profiles in different regions of the brain relevant to depression

Depression is a widespread disorder with a significant burden on individuals and society. There are various available treatments for patients with depression. However, not all patients respond adequately to their treatment. Recently, the opioid system has regained interest in depression studies. Research in animals and humans suggest that blocking the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) may potentially alleviate the symptoms of depression. The mechanism behind this effect is not fully understood. Stress and alterations in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA-axis) activity are thought to play a crucial role in depression. This study aimed to characterize stress hormones and stress-related protein expression following activation of KOR using a selective agonist. The longitudinal effect was investigated 24 h after KOR activation using the selective agonist U50,488 in Sprague Dawley rats. Stress-related hormones and protein expression patterns were explored using multiplex bead-based assays and western blotting. We found that KOR activation caused an increase in both adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone (CORT) in serum. Regarding protein assays in different brain regions, phosphorylated glucocorticoid receptors also increased significantly in thalamus (THL), hypothalamus (HTH), and striatum (STR). C-Fos increased time-dependently in THL following KOR activation, extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) increased significantly in STR and amygdala (AMG), while phosphorylated ERK1/2 decreased during the first 2 h and then increased again in AMG and prefrontal cortex (PFC). This study shows that KOR activation alters the HPA axis and ERK signaling which may cause to develop mood disorders.

Measurement of Direct-Photon Cross Section and Double-Helicity Asymmetry at sqrt[s]=510 GeV in p[over →]+p[over →] Collisions

We present measurements of the cross section and double-helicity asymmetry A_{LL} of direct-photon production in p[over →]+p[over →] collisions at sqrt[s]=510  GeV. The measurements have been performed at midrapidity (|η|<0.25) with the PHENIX detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. At relativistic energies, direct photons are dominantly produced from the initial quark-gluon hard scattering and do not interact via the strong force at leading order. Therefore, at sqrt[s]=510  GeV, where leading-order-effects dominate, these measurements provide clean and direct access to the gluon helicity in the polarized proton in the gluon-momentum-fraction range 0.02<x<0.08, with direct sensitivity to the sign of the gluon contribution.

Cardiac evaluation of hospitalized children with 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) infection at a single large quaternary center

Background

Cardiac complications of serious SARS-CoV-2 infections, especially Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome of Children (MIS-C) are well described, however current studies have not considered pediatric patients hospitalized with no cardiac concerns. We established a protocol for cardiac evaluation of all admitted COVID-19 patients three weeks post-discharge, irrespective of cardiac concerns. We assessed cardiovascular outcomes and hypothesized that patients with absent cardiac concerns are at lower risk for cardiac abnormalities.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 160 patients admitted for COVID-19 (excluding MIS-C) between March 2020 and September 2021 with subsequent echocardiogram(s) performed at our center. Patients were divided into 4 subgroups: Group 1 included patients with absent cardiac concerns, admitted to acute care (1a) and intensive care unit (ICU) (1 b). Group 2 included patients with cardiac concerns, admitted to acute care (2a) and ICU (2 b). Groups were compared based on clinical endpoints and echocardiographic measurements, including tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) assessment of diastolic function (z-score of septal Mitral E/TDI E' and lateral E/TDI E'). Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used.

Results

Traditional cardiac abnormalities varied significantly between the groups; with Group 2 b having the most (n = 8, 21%), but still found in Group 1a (n = 2, 3%) and Group 1 b (n = 1, 5%). No patients in Group 1 demonstrated abnormal systolic function, compared to Group 2a (n = 1, 3%) and Group 2 b (n = 3, 9%, p = 0.07). When including TDI assessment of diastolic function, the total incidence of abnormalities found on echocardiogram was increased in all groups.

Conclusion

Cardiac abnormalities were found in pediatric patients admitted with COVID-19, even those without apparent cardiovascular concerns. The risk was greatest in ICU-admitted patients with cardiac concerns. The clinical significance of diastolic function assessment in these patients remains unknown. Further studies are needed to assess long-term cardiovascular sequelae of children with COVID-19, irrespective of cardiac concerns.

Interrupting Endocrine Therapy to Attempt Pregnancy after Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Prospective data on the risk of recurrence among women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer who temporarily discontinue endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a single-group trial in which we evaluated the temporary interruption of adjuvant endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy in young women with previous breast cancer. Eligible women were 42 years of age or younger; had had stage I, II, or III disease; had received adjuvant endocrine therapy for 18 to 30 months; and desired pregnancy. The primary end point was the number of breast cancer events (defined as local, regional, or distant recurrence of invasive breast cancer or new contralateral invasive breast cancer) during follow-up. The primary analysis was planned to be performed after 1600 patient-years of follow-up. The prespecified safety threshold was the occurrence of 46 breast cancer events during this period. Breast cancer outcomes in this treatment-interruption group were compared with those in an external control cohort consisting of women who would have met the entry criteria for the current trial.

RESULTS

Among 516 women, the median age was 37 years, the median time from breast cancer diagnosis to enrollment was 29 months, and 93.4% had stage I or II disease. Among 497 women who were followed for pregnancy status, 368 (74.0%) had at least one pregnancy and 317 (63.8%) had at least one live birth. In total, 365 babies were born. At 1638 patient-years of follow-up (median follow-up, 41 months), 44 patients had a breast cancer event, a result that did not exceed the safety threshold. The 3-year incidence of breast cancer events was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 11.6) in the treatment-interruption group and 9.2% (95% CI, 7.6 to 10.8) in the control cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Among select women with previous hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer, temporary interruption of endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy did not confer a greater short-term risk of breast cancer events, including distant recurrence, than that in the external control cohort. Further follow-up is critical to inform longer-term safety. (Funded by ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation and others; POSITIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02308085.).

Phase I Study and Cell-Free DNA Analysis of T-DM1 and Metronomic Temozolomide for Secondary Prevention of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

Preclinical data showed that prophylactic, low-dose temozolomide (TMZ) significantly prevented breast cancer brain metastasis. We present results of a phase I trial combining T-DM1 with TMZ for the prevention of additional brain metastases after previous occurrence and local treatment in patients with HER2+ breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had HER2+ breast cancer with brain metastases and were within 12 weeks of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery, and/or surgery. Standard doses of T-DM1 were administered intravenously every 21 days (3.6 mg/kg) and TMZ was given orally daily in a 3+3 phase I dose escalation design at 30, 40, or 50 mg/m2, continuously. DLT period was one 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint was safety and recommended phase II dose. Symptom questionnaires, brain MRI, and systemic CT scans were performed every 6 weeks. Cell-free DNA sequencing was performed on patients' plasma and CSF.

RESULTS

Twelve women enrolled, nine (75%) with prior SRS therapy and three (25%) with prior WBRT. Grade 3 or 4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (1/12), neutropenia (1/12), lymphopenia (6/12), and decreased CD4 (6/12), requiring pentamidine for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis. No DLT was observed. Four patients on the highest TMZ dose underwent dose reductions. At trial entry, 6 of 12 patients had tumor mutations in CSF, indicating ongoing metastatic colonization despite a clear MRI. Median follow-up on study was 9.6 m (2.8-33.9); only 2 patients developed new parenchymal brain metastases. Tumor mutations varied with patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Metronomic TMZ in combination with standard dose T-DM1 shows low-grade toxicity and potential activity in secondary prevention of HER2+ brain metastases.

Abstract PD7-03: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial 022: Neratinib and Trastuzumab-Emtansine for HER2+ Breast Cancer Brain Metastases (BCBM)

PURPOSE: Treatment options for patients (pts) with HER2+ BCBM remain limited. We previously reported that neratinib monotherapy is associated with a volumetric central nervous system objective response rate (CNS ORR) of 8%, whereas the combination of neratinib and capecitabine resulted in a volumetric CNS ORR of 49% (in lapatinib-naïve pts). Preclinical data suggest that neratinib may overcome resistance to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and that the combination has potential CNS efficacy. Here, we report results of neratinib plus T-DM1 in pts with HER2+ BCBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, phase II study, pts with measurable HER2+ BCBM received neratinib 160 mg orally once daily plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg IV every 21 days in three parallel-enrolling cohorts. Cohort 4A enrolled pts with previously untreated brain metastases. Cohort 4B enrolled pts with BCBM progressing after prior local CNS-directed therapy without prior exposure to T-DM1. Cohort 4C enrolled pts with BCBM progressing after prior local CNS-directed therapy who had previous exposure to T-DM1. Diarrhea prophylaxis with colestipol and loperamide was required during cycle 1. Cohorts 4A and 4B were single-stage with a planned enrollment of 20 patients; cohort 4C had a two-stage design, with a requirement for at least 1 of the first 9 pts to achieve a response in order to enroll a total of 24 patients. The primary endpoint was Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO BM) in each cohort separately. Correlative studies included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for gastrointestinal toxicity. RESULTS: We enrolled 6, 17, and 21 patients to cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C, during 11/07/2018 – 11/01/2021. Enrollment was stopped prematurely due to slow accrual. Across Cohorts 4A-4C, the median number of prior lines of chemotherapy prior to enrollment was 2 (range 1-10); 25% received prior lapatinib and no patients received prior tucatinib. In cohorts 4B and 4C (prior CNS-treated cohorts), 33% had prior CNS surgery and &gt;94% had prior CNS radiation. Among evaluable patients, CNS ORR in cohorts 4A (n=6), 4B (n=16), and 4C (n=21) was 50.0% (95% CI 18.8- 81.2%), 25.0% (95% CI 8.3-52.6%), and 38.1% (95% CI 19.0-61.3%), respectively. Median (range) number of cycles completed for 4A, 4B, and 4C was 4.5 (1-15), 4 (range 0-49+), and 6 (0-23); three patients on Cohort 4B remain on protocol therapy (cycles 14, 45, and 49). The overall survival at 12-months for cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C was 83.3% (95% CI, 58.3-100%), 86.2% (95% CI 70-100%), and 83.3% (95% CI 67.6-100%). Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 toxicity (19.0–33.3% across cohorts); one grade 4 liver function event occurred in cohort 4B. Updated efficacy results will be reported at the meeting; PRO analyses are ongoing. CONCLUSION: Intracranial activity was observed for the combination of neratinib plus T-DM1 across all three enrolled cohorts, including those with prior T-DM1 exposure, suggesting synergistic effects of this treatment combination. Our data provide additional evidence for consideration of neratinib-based combinations in pts with HER2+ BCBM.

Citation Format: Rachel Freedman, Siyang Ren, Nabihah Tayob, Rebecca Gelman, Karen L. Smith, Raechel Davis, Alyssa Pereslete, Victoria Attaya, Christine Cotter, Wendy Y. Chen, Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria, Catherine Van Poznak, Beverly Moy, Adam M. Brufsky, Michelle Melisko, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Nadia Ashai, Yasmeen Rauf, Julie Nangia, Dario Trapani, Jennifer Savoie, Robyn Burns, Antonio C. Wolff, Eric Winer, Mothaffar Rimawi, Ian Krop, Nancy U. Lin. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial 022: Neratinib and Trastuzumab-Emtansine for HER2+ Breast Cancer Brain Metastases (BCBM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-03.

Abstract GS4-09: Pregnancy Outcome and Safety of Interrupting Therapy for women with endocrine responsIVE breast cancer: Primary Results from the POSITIVE Trial (IBCSG 48-14/BIG 8-13)

Background: Pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) is of substantial importance for many young women at diagnosis and during follow-up. BC treatment including standard endocrine therapy (ET) (5-10 years) may reduce ovarian reserve and the chances of subsequent successful pregnancy, given conception is contraindicated during ET. A temporary interruption of ET to attempt and carry a pregnancy in this population has never been prospectively studied.

Methods: POSITIVE is a single-arm, prospective, investigator-initiated, international trial evaluating the safety and pregnancy outcomes of interrupting ET for young women with early-stage hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) BC who desire pregnancy. The primary objective is to assess the risk of BC relapse associated with ET interruption for ~2 years to achieve pregnancy. Women ≤42 years with stage I-III HR+ BC who received adjuvant ET (SERM alone, GnRH analogue plus SERM or AI) for 18 to 30 months and wished to interrupt ET to attempt pregnancy were eligible. The primary endpoint is breast cancer free interval (BCFI) defined as the time from enrollment to the first BC event (local, regional, distant recurrence or a new invasive contralateral BC). Planned sample size was 500 patients. Three interim analyses of BCFI were reviewed by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) to assure a 95% chance of stopping the trial early if the annual BCFI event rate exceeded 4%; with primary analysis triggered after 1600 patient years of follow-up (pyfu) and no more than 46 BCFI events defined as the safety threshold. The DSMC recommended continuing the study following each interim analysis. We now report the primary results.

Results: From 12/2014 to 12/2019, 518 women were enrolled. At enrollment, the median age of participants was 37 years (27-43 years); 75.0% were nulliparous, 93.4% had stage I/II disease, 66.3% node-negative. Median time from BC diagnosis to enrollment was 29 months (IQR: 25-32). Tamoxifen alone was the most prescribed ET (41.7%), followed by tamoxifen+ovarian function suppression (35.7%). 62.0% of participants had received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 41 months (1638 pyfu), 44 participants had experienced a BCFI event, not exceeding the pre-specified safety threshold of 46 events. The 3-year BCFI failure percent was 8.9% (95% CI: 6.3 to 11.6%), similar to the 9.2% (95% CI: 7.6 to 10.8%) calculated in the comparative external control cohort from the SOFT/TEXT trials (Sun et al, Breast 2020). Of 497 women followed for pregnancy status, 368 (74.0%) had at least one pregnancy, 317 (63.8%) had at least one live birth, with a total of 365 babies born. Based on competing risk analysis, 76.3% of patients resumed ET (half within 26 months), 8.3% had BCFI event/death before ET resumption, and 15.4% had not resumed ET yet.

Conclusions: The POSITIVE trial demonstrates that for young women with early HR+ BC desiring pregnancy, temporary interruption of ET to attempt pregnancy does not confer a greater short-term risk of recurrence than that observed in a modern historical control group that did not interrupt ET. Most participants have had a live birth. Further follow-up is planned to confirm long-term safety. These results should be considered in counselling BC patients desiring future pregnancy.

Citation Format: Ann Partridge, Olivia Pagani, Samuel M. Niman, Monica Ruggeri, Fedro Alessandro A. Peccatori, Hatem A. Azim, Marco Colleoni, Cristina Saura, Chikako Shimizu, Anna Saetersdal, Judith Kroep, Audrey Mailliez, Ellen Warner, Virginia F. Borges, Frédéric Amant, Andrea Gombos, Akemi Kataoka, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Simona Borstnar, Junko Takei, Jeong Eon Lee, Janice Walshe, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Halle Moore, Christobel Saunders, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Snezana Susnjar, Fatima Cardoso, Karen L. Smith, Teresa Ferreiro Vilarino, Karin Ribi, Kathryn Ruddy, Sarra El-Abed, Martine Piccart, Larissa A. Korde, Aron Goldhirsch, Richard D. Gelber. Pregnancy Outcome and Safety of Interrupting Therapy for women with endocrine responsIVE breast cancer: Primary Results from the POSITIVE Trial (IBCSG 48-14/BIG 8-13) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-09.

Abstract P6-08-07: Reasons for Reduced Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 057 Survey

Background: Historically, less than 10% of adult patients with cancer enroll in clinical trials, however, enrollment dropped further at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers to trial participation during the pandemic have not been reported. As part of the TBCRC 057 survey on the impact of the pandemic on willingness to participate in breast cancer trials, we assessed reasons for reluctance to participate in trials during the pandemic.

Methods: US residents who self-reported a breast cancer diagnosis were eligible to complete the online survey 8/6/21-9/30/21. Respondents indicated whether they were current trial participants and, if not, their willingness to consider participating in a trial during the pandemic using a 5-point scale (0-not at all willing to 4-definitely willing). Respondents who were not current trial participants and who were not “definitely willing” to consider participation during the pandemic were characterized as “reluctant” and asked to select reasons for their reluctance from a checklist. Pandemic-related anxiety was assessed on an 11-point scale (0-no anxiety to 10-worst anxiety possible). Respondents indicated how the option to conduct trial activities online would affect their decision to participate in a trial (much less likely, somewhat less likely, would not affect my decision, somewhat more likely, or much more likely). In exploratory analyses, we evaluated whether pandemic-related anxiety and favorable reactions towards opportunities to conduct trial activities online were associated with reluctance to consider trial participation during the pandemic due to fear of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Means were compared with two sample t-tests and proportions with Fisher’s exact tests.

Results: Of 385 survey respondents, 185 (48%) were characterized as reluctant to consider trial participation during the pandemic. Among these 185, median age was 55 (range 25-80), 85.7% were non-Hispanic White, 48.1% had metastatic disease and 44.2% received care at academic centers. Reasons for reluctance to consider trial participation during the pandemic cited by ≥15% of the 185 reluctant respondents are shown in the Table. Respondents who selected fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 as a reason for their reluctance to consider participating in a trial during the pandemic had higher mean pandemic-related anxiety (7.0 vs 5.2, p&lt; 0.001). These respondents were more likely to indicate telemedicine doctor visits (p=0.01), virtual consents (p=0.001) and online study questionnaires (p=0.001) would make them somewhat or much more likely to participate in trials than respondents who did not select fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 as a reason for their reluctance.

Conclusions: Reasons for reluctance of patients with breast cancer to consider participation in clinical trials during the pandemic are multifactorial. Although concerns about safety and efficacy remain prominent, fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 drives unwillingness to participate in &gt;25% of reluctant patients. Trial accrual may benefit from incorporation of electronic activities when possible.

Table

Citation Format: Karen L. Smith, Carolyn Mead-Harvey, Gina L. Mazza, Albert E. Holler, Eileen Shinn, Elizabeth Frank, Michelle Melisko, Cyd Eaton, Jeannine M. Salamone, Teri Pollastro, Patricia Spears, Antonio C. Wolff, Gabrielle B. Rocque. Reasons for Reduced Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 057 Survey [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-07.

Abstract TMP54: Increased Thrombectomy Time Saving From Melbourne Mobile Stroke Unit Operation During Covid-19 Pandemic

Introduction: Mobile stroke units (MSU) have demonstrated major time savings for thrombolysis but mixed evidence for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). COVID-19 precautions have dramatically slowed EVT workflows across Australia and we therefore aimed to examine the effect of the Melbourne MSU on thrombectomy times before and during the current pandemic.

Methods: Patients receiving EVT facilitated by the Melbourne MSU from 2017-2021 were compared to non-MSU patients (metropolitan direct and secondary transfer for EVT) admitted to the largest Melbourne EVT centre. Quantile regression analysis was used to calculate the median time difference (50 th quantile) between MSU and non-MSU patients before and during the pandemic, grouped by patients within an EVT centre ambulance catchment or those outside (who either received inter-hospital transfer or MSU-facilitated bypass to an EVT centre).

Results: A total of 402 patients (112 MSU) were included. Pre-pandemic, no reduction in dispatch to arterial access time was seen for MSU patients within an EVT centre catchment (median 11min slower, p=0.38). However, a significant time saving was observed during the pandemic (median 29 min faster, p<0.001, p-interaction=0.0065). MSU care reduced hospital arrival to arterial access time by median 19min pre-pandemic vs 40 min during the pandemic, p-interaction<0.001). The pandemic did not alter MSU-related time savings for patients located outside of an EVT centre catchment.

Conclusions: Melbourne MSU facilitation of EVT during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in greater time savings for patients located close to a thrombectomy centre, while substantial time savings were maintained for those needing bypass from the local non-EVT hospital. This suggests that MSU operation enables streamlined EVT workflows during the pandemic by providing early pre-hospital notification and interventional angiography activation.

Abstract WMP47: Low Sensitivity Of Widely Used Emergency Dispatch Algorithm For Thrombectomy Patients - Implications For Mobile Stroke Units

Introduction: Widely used emergency dispatch algorithms such as the Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS) have limited diagnostic accuracy for prehospital diagnosis of stroke. With advent of mobile stroke units (MSU), this inaccuracy prevents optimal dispatch to patients who may benefit. Expedited endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a major contributor to net benefit of MSUs. We assessed the accuracy of AMPDS for recognizing stroke in thrombectomy patients in the Australian state of Victoria.

Methods: We included consecutive patients accepted for EVT (direct and secondary transfer) to The Royal Melbourne Hospital from 2007-2021 in whom linked AMPDS dispatch codes could be obtained from Ambulance Victoria. The primary outcome was the proportion of cases dispatched as stroke vs non-stroke with subgroup analyses of the effect of baseline clinical severity, metropolitan vs rural dispatch and time to thrombectomy. Chi square and Mann Whitney tests were used as appropriate.

Results: A total of n=618 patients were included with baseline NIHSS 16 (IQR 10-20). Of these, only 62% (95% CI 58-66) were initially dispatched as suspected stroke, with the most common non-stroke diagnoses being “Unconscious/Fainting” (19.2%) and “Falls” (6.9%). Those with a higher baseline severity (NIHSS ≥10) were less likely to be classified as stroke than those with lower severity (59% vs 76%, p<0.001), while no difference was found between metropolitan and rural patients (p=0.066). Overall, no significant time differences were found between stroke and non-stroke dispatches for ambulance dispatch to arterial access (median 208 vs 216 min, p=0.593) or hospital arrival to arterial access (median 42 vs 42 min, p=0.851). However, only 32 patients were treated on the MSU, which commenced operation November 2017.

Conclusions: Almost 40% of thrombectomy patients did not receive an initial AMPDS dispatch of suspected stroke and those with higher baseline severity were more likely to be misclassified. Although time to thrombectomy was not significantly different between stroke vs non-stroke dispatches, MSU treatment was under-represented. Our findings have implications for emergency medical services and particularly mobile stroke units which rely on accurate stroke dispatch.

Characterization of pain-, anxiety-, and cognition-related behaviors in the complete Freund's adjuvant model of chronic inflammatory pain in Wistar-Kyoto rats

Introduction

Chronic pain is often associated with comorbid anxiety and cognitive dysfunction, negatively affecting therapeutic outcomes. The influence of genetic background on such interactions is poorly understood. The stress-hyperresponsive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rat strain, which models aspects of anxiety and depression, displays enhanced sensitivity to noxious stimuli and impaired cognitive function, compared with Sprague-Dawley (SD) counterparts. However, pain- and anxiety-related behaviors and cognitive impairment following induction of a persistent inflammatory state have not been investigated simultaneously in the WKY rats. Here we compared the effects of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced persistent inflammation on pain-, negative affect- and cognition-related behaviors in WKY vs. SD rats.

Methods

Male WKY and SD rats received intra-plantar injection of CFA or needle insertion (control) and, over the subsequent 4 weeks, underwent behavioral tests to assess mechanical and heat hypersensitivity, the aversive component of pain, and anxiety- and cognition-related behaviors.

Results

The CFA-injected WKY rats exhibited greater mechanical but similar heat hypersensitivity compared to SD counterparts. Neither strain displayed CFA-induced pain avoidance or anxiety-related behavior. No CFA-induced impairment was observed in social interaction or spatial memory in WKY or SD rats in the three-chamber sociability and T-maze tests, respectively, although strain differences were apparent. Reduced novel object exploration time was observed in CFA-injected SD, but not WKY, rats. However, CFA injection did not affect object recognition memory in either strain.

Conclusions

These data indicate exacerbated baseline and CFA-induced mechanical hypersensitivity, and impairments in novel object exploration, and social and spatial memory in WKY vs. SD rats.

Adjuvant treatment decisions among women age > 65 with early-stage, hormone-receptor breast cancer seen in multidisciplinary clinic versus standard consultation

281

Background: Randomized studies and national guidelines support de-escalation of adjuvant therapy for a target population of woman >65 years with Stage I, ER positive breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. We sought to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) in this population by comparing treatment patterns and patient perceptions of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and hormone therapy (HT) between patients seen in MDC vs. standard consultation. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for women in the above target population who underwent surgery between 8/2020- 5/2022at our institution. Two cohorts were included: (1) patients seen in MDC, and 2) patients seen in standard clinic separately by medical and radiation oncology (non-MDC cohort). The non-MDC patients declined, could not attend, and/or were not referred to the MDC. Patients in the MDC cohort were prospectively administered validated questionnaires to evaluate patient reported data including the Decision Autonomy Preference Scale (DAPS), e-Prognosis, and Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Scale (MMS). Chi square, t-tests, and non-parametric equivalents compared demographics and logistic and linear regression evaluated RT and HT use and survey score outcomes between cohorts. Results: A total of 128 patients met inclusion criteria, with 33 MDC and 94 non-MDC patients. There was no difference between the cohorts in age, margin status, histology, grade, or focality. In the MDC cohort there were significantly fewer sentinel lymph node biopsies (42.4% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.003) and mean tumor size was smaller (0.69 vs. 0.96 cm, p < 0.003). There was no significant difference in receipt of RT (65% MDC vs 77% standard; OR = 0.55, p = 0.189, HT (78% MDC vs 72% standard; OR = 1.36, p = 0.534), or both (65% MDC vs 77% standard; OR = 0.7, p = 0.430). The MDC cohort was significantly more likely to undergo accelerated (vs. standard hypofractionated) RT (70% vs 39%; OR = 3.60, p = 0.020). In MDC patients with completed questionnaires (n = 33), by DAPS, all “mostly patient (n = 8)” chose RT while all “mostly doctor (n = 1)” chose no RT (p = 0.063). Based on e-Prognosis, there were lower odds of RT for increasing Schonberg score/ higher 10yr mortality risk (OR 0.600, p = 0.048). MIMS score > 40 (“maximizer”) was strongly correlated with the use of RT (OR 18.57, p = 0.011). Conclusions: For women > 65 years with early stage, ER positive breast cancer, MDC participation was not associated with lower use of adjuvant RT or HT versus standard consultation but was significantly associated with shorter RT courses. DAPS and MMS results indicate that patient treatment preference may be predictable, highlighting an opportunity to tailor consultation discussions and recommendations based on intrinsic patient preferences and individual goals.

The effect of modifications to clinical trial activities implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic on willingness to participate in clinical trials: The TBCRC 057 survey

97

Background: In order to maintain safety, clinical trial activities have been modified during the COVID-19 pandemic. As part of the TBCRC 057 survey, we assessed how pandemic-related modifications to trial activities affect breast cancer patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials. Methods: US residents with breast cancer were eligible to complete the online survey 8/6/21 – 9/30/21. Respondents rated whether each of 11 modifications to clinical trial activities would affect their decision to participate in a trial during or after the pandemic. Items evaluated modifications that involved changing the location of trial activities to closer to home, switching trial activities to telemedicine and making the trial schedule more flexible and convenient. Response options were “much less likely to participate”, “somewhat less likely to participate”, “would not affect my decision whether or not to participate”, “somewhat more likely to participate” and “much more likely to participate”. Current trial participants were asked to consider how modifications would affect their decision to participate in another trial. Results are reported descriptively. Results: Among 385 respondents, median age was 52 (range 25-85), 88.6% were non-Hispanic White, 52.5% had metastatic disease, 93% were receiving active treatment, 48.6% received care at an academic center and 9.6% were current trial participants. Changing location of trial activities was viewed favorably, with 70.2%, 64.6% and 54.1% of respondents indicating they would be much or somewhat more likely to participate if they could complete trial blood tests, x-ray tests or doctor visits closer to home, respectively. Similarly, the option to complete trial activities electronically was viewed favorably, with 59.6%, 58.6% and 60.9% of respondents indicating they would be much or somewhat more likely to participate if they could complete trial doctor visits, consent and questionnaires via telemedicine, respectively. With regard to modifications to make the trial schedule more flexible and convenient, respondent feedback was also favorable. 71.4%, 67.7% and 82.4% of respondents indicated that requiring study site visits no more than once per 3 weeks, widening windows for trial activities and offering home delivery of oral study medications, respectively, would make them much or somewhat more likely to participate. Finally, 30.4% and 51.7% indicated that the flexibility to opt-out of research-only blood tests and biopsies, respectively, would make them much or somewhat more likely to participate. Conclusions: Patients view modifications to trial activities implemented during the pandemic favorably. Trials should be flexible and the option to conduct study activities close to home or electronically when possible should be maintained during the pandemic and beyond.

Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings

Objective

Organizational responses that support healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigate health risks are necessary to offset the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to understand how HCWs and key personnel working in healthcare settings in Melbourne, Australia perceived their employing organizations' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method

In this qualitative study, conducted May-July 2021 as part of the longitudinal Coronavirus in Victorian Healthcare and Aged Care Workers (COVIC-HA) study, we purposively sampled and interviewed HCWs and key personnel from healthcare organizations across hospital, ambulance, aged care and primary care (general practice) settings. We also examined HCWs' free-text responses to a question about organizational resources and/or supports from the COVIC-HA Study's baseline survey. We thematically analyzed data using an iterative process.

Results

We analyzed data from interviews with 28 HCWs and 21 key personnel and free-text responses from 365 HCWs, yielding three major themes: navigating a changing and uncertain environment, maintaining service delivery during a pandemic, and meeting the safety and psychological needs of staff . HCWs valued organizational efforts to engage openly and honesty with staff, and proactive responses such as strategies to enhance workplace safety (e.g., personal protective equipment spotters). Suggestions for improvement identified in the themes included streamlined information processes, greater involvement of HCWs in decision-making, increased investment in staff wellbeing initiatives and sustainable approaches to strengthen the healthcare workforce.

Conclusions

This study provides in-depth insights into the challenges and successes of organizational responses across four healthcare settings in the uncertain environment of a pandemic. Future efforts to mitigate the impact of acute stressors on HCWs should include a strong focus on bidirectional communication, effective and realistic strategies to strengthen and sustain the healthcare workforce, and greater investment in flexible and meaningful psychological support and wellbeing initiatives for HCWs.

TBCRC 057: An online survey about anxiety and willingness to participate in breast cancer clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic

1564

Background: Enrollment in clinical trials has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. Simultaneously, breast cancer patients have reported heightened anxiety. We assessed whether breast cancer patients’ anxiety about the pandemic affects their willingness to participate in trials. Methods: English or Spanish-speaking US residents with breast cancer were eligible to complete the online REDCap survey 8/6/21 – 9/30/21. Respondents rated their anxiety about the pandemic on an 11-point scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 10 (worst anxiety possible). Anxiety scores were categorized as no/mild (0-3), moderate (4-6) or severe (7-10). Knowledge about trials was assessed with 11 true/false items and attitudes toward trials with the Attitudes Toward Cancer Trials Scales - Cancer Treatment Subscale (ATCTS-CTS). Respondents rated their willingness to participate in a breast cancer clinical trial before and during the pandemic on 5-point scales from 0 (not at all willing) to 4 (definitely willing). Trial participants were considered “definitely willing.” Change in willingness to participate in trials during the pandemic compared to prior was defined as a binary outcome, "less willing" vs "no less willing." Means were compared via t-test and mean difference was tested via paired t-test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association of anxiety and other factors with being less willing to participate in trials during compared to prior to the pandemic. Results: Among 385 respondents, median age was 52 (range 25-85), 271 (70%) were non-Hispanic White and 202 (53%) had metastatic disease. 154 (40%) received care at academic centers and 37 (10%) were current trial participants. Most rated their anxiety as moderate (43%) or severe (38%). Mean willingness to participate in a trial was lower during compared to prior to the pandemic (2.97 vs 3.10; p < 0.0001). Fifty (13%) respondents were less willing to participate in a trial during the pandemic compared to prior. After controlling for covariates, those with severe anxiety had 5.07 times odds of being less willing to participate during the pandemic compared to prior than those with no/mild anxiety (p = 0.01). For every 1-point increase in ATCTS-CTS score (indicating better attitude toward trials) there was a 3% decrease in the odds of being less willing to participate during the pandemic (p = 0.006). For every 1-point increase in the clinical trials knowledge score (indicating more knowledge) there was a 15% decrease in the odds of being less willing to participate during the pandemic (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Pandemic-related anxiety is common in breast cancer patients and is associated with being less willing to participate in trials during the pandemic compared to prior. Education about trials, including safety modifications implemented during the pandemic, may mitigate anxiety and improve willingness to participate.

Mental Health Outcomes in Australian Healthcare and Aged-Care Workers during the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objective: the COVID-19 pandemic has incurred psychological risks for healthcare workers (HCWs). We established a Victorian HCW cohort (the Coronavirus in Victorian Healthcare and Aged-Care Workers (COVIC-HA) cohort study) to examine COVID-19 impacts on HCWs and assess organisational responses over time. Methods: mixed-methods cohort study, with baseline data collected via an online survey (7 May–18 July 2021) across four healthcare settings: ambulance, hospitals, primary care, and residential aged-care. Outcomes included self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress (PTS), wellbeing, burnout, and resilience, measured using validated tools. Work and home-related COVID-19 impacts and perceptions of workplace responses were also captured. Results: among 984 HCWs, symptoms of clinically significant depression, anxiety, and PTS were reported by 22.5%, 14.0%, and 20.4%, respectively, highest among paramedics and nurses. Emotional exhaustion reflecting moderate–severe burnout was reported by 65.1%. Concerns about contracting COVID-19 at work and transmitting COVID-19 were common, but 91.2% felt well-informed on workplace changes and 78.3% reported that support services were available. Conclusions: Australian HCWs employed during 2021 experienced adverse mental health outcomes, with prevalence differences observed according to occupation. Longitudinal evidence is needed to inform workplace strategies that support the physical and mental wellbeing of HCWs at organisational and state policy levels.

Outcomes of patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest transported to an ECMO centre compared with transport to non-ECMO centres

Objective: To compare the outcomes of patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) transported to a hospital that provides extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) with patients transported to hospitals without ECPR capability. Design, setting: Retrospective review of patient care records in a pre-hospital and hospital setting. Participants: Adult patients with OHCA who left the scene and arrived with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in progress at 16 hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, between January 2016 and December 2019. Intervention: For selected patients transported to the ECPR centre, initiation of ECMO. Main outcome measures: Survival to hospital discharge and 12-month quality of life. Results: There were 223 eligible patients during the study period. Of 49 patients transported to the ECPR centre, 23 were commenced on ECMO. Of these, survival to hospital with good neurological recovery (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] score 1/2) occurred in 4/23 patients. Four other patients developed return of spontaneous circulation in the ECPR centre before cannulation of whom one survived, giving overall good functional outcome at 12 months survival of 5/49 (10.2%). There were 174 patients transported to the 15 non-ECPR centres and 3/174 (2%) had good functional outcome at 12 months. After adjustment for baseline differences, the odds ratio for good neurological outcome after transport to an ECPR centre compared with a non-ECPR centre was 4.63 (95% CI, 0.97-22.11; P = 0.055). Conclusion: The survival rate of patients with refractory OHCA transported to an ECPR centre remains low. Outcomes in larger cities might be improved with shorter scene times and additional ECPR centres that would provide for earlier initiation of ECMO.

Abstract P2-08-15: Clinical, pathologic, and molecular associations of tumor mutational burden in metastatic breast cancer

Background: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a biomarker approved to predict response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in solid tumors irrespective of their tissue of origin. However, there are limited data in patients with breast cancer and high TMB to support the use of ICB. The goal of this analysis is to describe clinical, pathological and molecular associations with TMB within a cohort of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: We included patients enrolled onto an ongoing prospective study titled Individualized Molecular Analyses Guide Efforts (IMAGE)-II. Patients eligible for IMAGE-II have metastatic breast cancer of any subtype that had progressed on at least one standard-of-care therapy. Genetic profiling of tumor tissue was performed at the discretion of the treating team using one of several commercially available next generation sequencing platforms. For purposes of this analysis, only patients who underwent tissue-based Foundation Medicine analysis are included as TMB assessments are different across different platforms. Data are summarized by descriptive statistics. Linear and logistic regression analyses are conducted to evaluate the association between TMB and other clinical, pathological and molecular factors. We will present data on associations with specific mutations (i.e. ESR1, ERBB2, DNA repair, Pi3K signaling, TP53) and ctDNA TMB at a later time. Results:Of 117 patients in the IMAGE-II database, median age was 57 (range 23-86), 65% were White, 29% Black, and 6% Other. TMB data were available on 62 patients. Of those with both TMB and subtype information, 35 (70%) had ER+HER2- tumors, and 15 (30%) had ER-HER2- tumors. Median TMB was 4 mutations/megabase and ranged from 0 to 27. We did not observe significant differences in TMB in patients with ER+HER2- and those with ER-HER2- tumors (median TMB of 4 [0-27] and 5 [1-25], respectively), nor between White versus Black patients (median TMB of 4 [0-27] and 5 [0-12], respectively). However, we did observe that age was positively associated with higher TMB (p-value = 0.02). Additionally, we observed that the time between metastatic diagnosis and TMB measurement was positively associated with TMB (p-value &lt; 0.01); this significant association was also observed in ER+HER2- patients (p-value &lt; 0.01) but not in ER-HER2- patients. Median time to obtaining TMB since metastatic diagnosis was 1.1 (range -0.8 - 12.8) years. More lines of chemotherapy prior to TMB assessment was not observed to be associated with higher TMB. Conclusions: We observed that TMB was higher in patients who have had a longer disease course. Further research is required to understand changes in TMB over time, and how TMB is correlated with. other genomic and tumor microenvironment characteristics. A deeper understanding of TMB may help refine it as a predictive biomarker for ICB.

Citation Format: Mohamed A Mohamed, Chenghuang Wang, Morgan Buckley, Jennifer Lehman, Jenna Canzoniero, Christopher D Gocke, Raquel Nunes, Ben Ho Park, Karen L Smith, Jessica Tao, Hanna Tukachinsky, Mary Wilkinson, Antonio C Wolff, Vered Stearns, Cesar A Santa-Maria. Clinical, pathologic, and molecular associations of tumor mutational burden in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-15.

Abstract P4-10-02: Patient-reported outcomes in EA1131: A randomized phase III trial of platinum vs. capecitabine in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background: Understanding health-related quality of life (HRQOL), including side effects, is critical to guide supportive care during chemotherapy. The EA1131 trial demonstrated that Platinum (Plat) was unlikely to improve outcomes compared to capecitabine (Cape) in patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) of basal subtype and ≥1 cm residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), supporting Cape as the continued standard of care. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were administered as a sub-study to understand HRQOL and symptoms from the patient’s perspective. Methods: EA1131 was amended in 9/2017 to add PRO endpoints and all patients enrolled after this amendment were eligible for the PRO sub-study. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (FBSI) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity Subscale (NtxS; Plat arm only) were administered at baseline (BL), cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), and following treatment at 6 and 15 months. Due to early trial termination, the PRO sub-study target accrual (n=362) was not reached. It was hypothesized that HRQOL, assessed by the FBSI-Treatment Side Effect (TSE) subscale (range 0-16, higher score = less side effects, better HRQOL), would indicate fewer post-treatment side effects at 6 and 15 months following Plat compared to Cape. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare FBSI-TSE subscale scores and total FBSI scores (range 0-64, higher score = better overall HRQOL) between arms at BL, C3D1, 6 months and 15 months. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare change in FBSI-TSE subscale scores and total FBSI scores from BL to C3D1 between arms. Change in NtxS scores (range 0-44, higher score = less neurotoxicity) from BL to C3D1 was evaluated with the paired t-test. Analyses were exploratory and p-values &lt;0.05 considered significant without multiple comparisons adjustment. Results: Of 331 patients eligible for the PRO sub-study (156 Plat arm, 175 Cape arm), 296 (89.4%) completed ≥1 PRO. Mean FBSI-TSE subscale scores were better for Cape at BL (Cape 14.5, Plat 13.9, p-value 0.02), for Plat at C3D1 (Cape 13.5, Plat 14.0, p-value 0.04), and did not differ at 6 months (Cape 14.6, Plat 14.7, p-value 0.70) or 15 months (Cape 14.9, Plat 14.5, p-value 0.44). FBSI-TSE subscale scores worsened from BL to C3D1 for Cape but not for Plat (mean change Cape -0.72, mean change Plat 0.15, p-value 0.003). FBSI-TSE subscale change scores from BL to C3D1 exceeded the threshold for clinically meaningful worsening (&gt; 1.5 points) in 27% of patients on Cape and 23% of patients on Plat (p-value 0.51). Mean total FBSI scores did not differ between arms at any time (BL: Cape 50.6, Plat 49.7; C3D1: Cape 48.1, Plat 48.0; 6 months: Cape 49.9, Plat 51.1; 15 months: Cape 53.3, Plat 50.3; all p &gt; 0.05). Mean change in total FBSI scores from BL to C3D1 did not differ between arms (Cape -2.20, Plat -1.83, p = 0.75). Mean (standard deviation) NtxS scores for the Plat arm were 38 (6.3), 36.1 (7.8), 36 (7.1) and 34.5 (7.9) at BL, C3D1, 6 months and 15 months, respectively. Mean NtxS score decreased (indicating worsening neurotoxicity) from BL to C3D1 (p-value 0.006). Conclusions: Despite more frequent severe toxicity by CTCAE criteria for Plat than Cape, patient-reported side effects worsened during treatment with Cape but not Plat. Overall, changes in HRQOL were small for both arms and resolved after therapy. However approximately one-fourth of patients had clinically meaningful worsening side effects on both arms. PRO-assessed neurotoxicity increased in the Plat arm. This PRO sub-study demonstrates that PROs capture toxicities beyond CTCAE criteria and provides novel data about patients’ experience during adjuvant chemotherapy following NAC for TNBC.

Citation Format: Karen L Smith, Fengmin Zhao, Ingrid A Mayer, Amye J Tevaarwerk, Sofia F Garcia, Carlos L Arteaga, William F Symmans, Ben H Park, Brian L Burnette, Della F Makower, Margaret Block, Kimberly A Morley, Chirag R Jani, Craig Mescher, Shabana J Dewani, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Lisa E Flaum, Erica L Mayer, William M Sikov, Eve T Rodler, Angela M DeMichele, Joseph A Sparano, Antonio C Wolff, Kathy D Miller, Lynne I Wagner. Patient-reported outcomes in EA1131: A randomized phase III trial of platinum vs. capecitabine in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-02.

Finding the facts in an infodemic: framing effective COVID-19 messages to connect people to authoritative content

The public’s need for timely and trusted COVID-19 information remains high. Governments and global health agencies such as the WHO have sought to disseminate accurate and timely information to counteract misinformation and disinformation that has arisen as part of an ‘infodemic’—the overabundance of information on COVID-19—some accurate and some not. In early 2020, WHO began a collaboration with Google to run online public service announcements on COVID-19, in the form of search ads displayed above results of Google Search queries. Web-based text ads can drive online searchers of COVID-19 information to authoritative COVID-19 content but determining what message is most effective is a challenge. WHO wanted to understand which message framing, that is, the way in which ad information is worded for the public, leads searchers to click through to WHO content. WHO tested 71 text ads in English across four COVID-19 topics using a mix of message frames: descriptive, collective, gain, loss, appeals to values and emphasising reasons. Between 11 September 2020 and 23 November 2020, there were 13 million views of the experimental WHO text ads leading to 1.4 million click-throughs to the WHO website. Within the set of 71 ads, there was a large spread between the most effective and least effective messages; for messages on COVID-19, the best performing framings were more than twice as effective as the worst performing framings (18.7% vs 8.5% engagement rate). Health practitioners can apply the messaging tactics WHO found to be successful to rapidly optimise messages for their own public health campaigns and better reach the public with authoritative information. Similar collaboration between big technology companies and governments and global health agencies has the potential to advance public health.

Late effects in a high-risk population of breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

To better understand the impact of cancer and treatment on outcomes and guide program development, we evaluated breast cancer survivors at risk for long-term medical and psychosocial issues who participated in survivorship care visits (SVs) at Johns Hopkins Hospital.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective survey study of women with stage I-III breast cancer who participated in SVs from 2010-2016. The same 56-item questionnaire administered at SV and follow-up included an assessment of symptoms, social factors, demographics, anxiety, depression, and comorbidities. We added the Godin Exercise questionnaire to the follow-up.

RESULTS

In 2018, 74 participants were identified as disease-free and mailed a follow-up survey; 52 (70.3%) completed the survey. At a median follow-up time of 3.1 years after diagnosis, participants were less likely to be employed (54% vs. 67%) than at the SV. About two-thirds were sedentary, and this was associated with high body mass index (p = 0.02). Sufficiently active participants (≥ 150 min per week of moderate-intensity activity) were less likely to report pain (p = 0.02) or fatigue (p = 0.001). Although 19% had moderate/severe anxiety or depression at follow-up, participants who reported employment satisfaction were less likely to be depressed (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of issues faced by survivors is critical for enhancing care and developing models to identify patients who might benefit most from targeted long-term interventions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Interventions to address physical activity, persistent symptoms, and mental health are critical for breast cancer survivors.

Abstract TMP11: Predictors Of Timely Treatment Of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - The Reddish Study

Background: Receiving early treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with better outcomes for the patient. However, delays in treatment of aSAH are common but the causes are not well understood. We explored predictors of early treatment within 12.5 hours or 24 hours after aSAH.

Methods: Consecutive cases of confirmed first-ever aSAH were identified from two Australian tertiary referral centers between 2010 and 2016. We used medical and ambulance records to extract details of participants, including time from onset to definitive treatment of either endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping, demographics, severity of aSAH (modified Fisher grade; World Federation of Neurosurgeons Scale [WFNS]), risk factors, pre-hospital care, and presenting symptoms. Factors associated with treatment to secure the aneurysm within 12.5 hours or 24 hours on univariable logistic regression were entered into a multivariable model to identify factors independently associated with (odds ratio [OR], 95% CI) earlier treatment.

Results: Among 482 patients (mean [SD] age 54.1 [14.5]; 69.9% female) with aSAH, median (IQR) time to treatment was 19.4 (10.6, 31.0) hours, 30% were treated <12.5h and 62% were treated <24h from onset. In multivariable analyses (see figure), arriving by ambulance, urgent triage category (1-2) and severe aSAH (modified Fisher Scale 3-4) predicted treatment <12.5h and <24h. Less severe aSAH (WFNS score 1-3) and arriving overnight (11pm to 7am) were associated with treatment <24h. In contrast, people with no risk factors for aSAH (smoking, hypertension or alcohol use), presenting with a stiff neck or interfacility transfer more often had treatment ≥12.5h.

Conclusions: A substantial proportion of people after aSAH were not treated within timeframes associated with better outcomes. Recognition of the urgency and severity aSAH cases were associated with more timely treatment of aSAH.

Abyssal Benthic Rover, an autonomous vehicle for long-term monitoring of deep-ocean processes

[Figure: see text].

Probing Gluon Spin-Momentum Correlations in Transversely Polarized Protons through Midrapidity Isolated Direct Photons in p^{↑}+p Collisions at sqrt[s]=200 GeV

Studying spin-momentum correlations in hadronic collisions offers a glimpse into a three-dimensional picture of proton structure. The transverse single-spin asymmetry for midrapidity isolated direct photons in p^{↑}+p collisions at sqrt[s]=200  GeV is measured with the PHENIX detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). Because direct photons in particular are produced from the hard scattering and do not interact via the strong force, this measurement is a clean probe of initial-state spin-momentum correlations inside the proton and is in particular sensitive to gluon interference effects within the proton. This is the first time direct photons have been used as a probe of spin-momentum correlations at RHIC. The uncertainties on the results are a 50-fold improvement with respect to those of the one prior measurement for the same observable, from the Fermilab E704 experiment. These results constrain gluon spin-momentum correlations in transversely polarized protons.

Change in Micronutrient Intake among People with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Adapting the Swank and Wahls Diets: An Analysis of Weighed Food Records

The low-saturated fat (Swank) and modified Paleolithic elimination (Wahls) diets have shown promise for MS symptoms; however, due to their restriction of specific foods, inadequate intake of micronutrients is concerning. Therefore, as part of a randomized trial, weighed food records were collected on three consecutive days and were used to evaluate the intake of micronutrients among people with relapsing remitting MS adapting these diets. After randomization to either the Swank or Wahls diets, diet education and support was provided by registered dietitians at baseline and throughout the first 12 weeks of the intervention. Usual intake of each micronutrient was estimated and then evaluated with the EAR-cut point method. At 12 weeks, the Swank group had significant reductions in the proportion with inadequate intake from food for vitamins C, D, and E, while the Wahls group had significant reductions for magnesium and vitamins A, C, D, and E. However, the proportion with inadequate intake significantly increased for calcium, thiamin, and vitamin B₁₂ in the Wahls group and for vitamin A in the Swank group. Inclusion of intake from supplements reduced the proportion with inadequate intake for all micronutrients except calcium among the Wahls group but increased the proportion with excessive intake for vitamin D and niacin among both groups and magnesium among the Swank group. Both diets, especially when including intake from supplements, are associated with reduced inadequate intake compared to the normal diet of people with relapsing remitting MS.

Fear of COVID-19: Effects on mental health in under-resourced patients with cancer

152

Background: Given the high risk of COVID-19 mortality, patients with cancer are not only vulnerable to physical consequences of COVID-19 infection, but also to adverse psychological outcomes, including fear of COVID-19. Without intervention, psychological distress in patients with cancer can lead to worsening symptoms, poor quality of life, and lower survival. We sought to evaluate the association between fear of COVID-19 and psychological distress for under-resourced patients with cancer during the pandemic. Methods: This observational, longitudinal survey study, fielded during early (May 20- July 11, 2020) and later pandemic (December 2-December 23, 2020), evaluated the pandemic’s impact on patients with cancer receiving Patient Advocate Foundation (PAF) services from July 2019 – April 2020. Questions focused on individual experiences with COVID-19 and psychological, emotional, physical, and material effects from the pandemic. The validated Fear of COVID-19 Scale was used to determine fear of COVID-19. Psychological distress was determined using a four-item questionnaire by Holingue et al. (score range 4 – 16). Means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using generalized estimating equation modeling with repeated measures to assess the effect of fear of COVID-19 on psychological distress early and later in the pandemic. Models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, annual household income, household size, marital status, employment status, Area Deprivation Index category, Rural-Urban Commuting Code category, cases per 100,000 in county of residence, cancer type, and number of comorbidities. Results: Amongst 1199 survey respondents, 94% considered themselves high risk for COVID-19. 448 respondents completed both the first and second survey. The majority of respondents were female (72%) and age 56-75 (55%); 40% were Black, Indigenous, or Persons of Color. In adjusted models of respondents who completed the early pandemic survey, respondents with more fear of COVID-19 had a higher mean psychological distress score (10.21; 95% CI 9.38-11.03) compared to respondents with less fear (7.55; 95% CI 6.75-8.36). Among those who completed the later pandemic survey, median fear of COVID-19 decreased (20 vs 19)median distress scores remained the same (8); respondents with more fear of COVID-19 had a higher mean psychological distress score (9.98; 95%CI 9.04-10.92) compared to respondents with less fear (7.87; 95%CI 6.98-8.76). Conclusions: Fear of COVID-19 was linked to psychological distress and persisted throughout the pandemic among under-resourced patients with cancer. Timely psychosocial support is critical to meet increased care needs experienced by patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given these results, fear of COVID-19 could be considered as a trigger to integrate psychological interventions in patients with cancer to treat psychological distress.

Association of fear of COVID-19 with delays in care or treatment interruptions in patients with cancer

98

Background: Patients with cancer are at risk for severe COVID-19 and may be vulnerable to health care delays. Delays or interruptions in care may lead to adverse cancer outcomes. Little is known about the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and disruptions in cancer care delivery. Methods: This longitudinal survey was distributed to individuals with cancer who received services July 2019-April 2020 from Patient Advocate Foundation, a non-profit organization that provides case management and financial aid to patients with chronic illness. Data was collected twice - early pandemic (5/20/20-7/11/20) and later pandemic (12/3/20-12/23/20). Fear of COVID-19 was assessed with the Fear of COVID-19 Scale and dichotomized as more (≥22) vs less (< 22) fearful. Respondents reported delays in care or treatment interruptions due to the pandemic and reasons for delays or interruptions. Respondents rated concern about potential long-term health issues due to delays on a 5-point Likert-like scale. We estimated predicted percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using logistic regression models to assess the association of fear of COVID-19 (more vs less fearful) with delay in care or treatment interruption (any vs none) at each time point. We adjusted models for age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, annual household income, marital status, employment status, household size, Area Deprivation Index category, Rural-Urban Commuting Code category, county-level COVID-cases per 100,000, cancer type and number of comorbidities. Results: Amongst the 1,199 early pandemic survey respondents, the majority were female (72%), had household income < $48,000 (73%), and had ≥1 comorbidity (60%). 448 of the early pandemic survey respondents also completed the later survey. 464 (39%) and 166 (37%) respondents were categorized as more fearful at the early and later time points respectively. 567 (47%) and 191 (43%) reported delays or interruptions at the early and later time points respectively. The most common reported reasons for delays or interruptions were hospital/provider restrictions (early: 27%, later: 19%) and patient choice (early: 13%, later: 15%). Among respondents with delays or interruptions at each time point, > 70% were at least moderately concerned about potential long-term health issues due to delays. In adjusted models, more fearful respondents had higher predicted percentages of delayed care or treatment interruptions compared to less fearful respondents early (more fearful: 56%, 95% CI 39%-72%; less fearful: 44%; 95% CI 28%-61%) and later (more fearful: 55%, 95% CI 35%-73%; less fearful: 38%; 95% CI 22%-57%) in the pandemic. Conclusions: Fear of COVID-19 is common among patients with cancer and is linked with delays in care and treatment interruptions. System-wide strategies are needed to address fear of COVID-19 and to ensure equitable, timely, and safe access to cancer care throughout the pandemic.

Patient-reported outcomes to assess symptoms in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Pilot implementation project

177

Background: Use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to evaluate symptoms improves clinical outcomes. Best practices for implementing PROs into routine care may vary according to clinical scenario, site-specific resources and programmatic goals. Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often experience a variety of symptoms. Methods: As a quality improvement project, we are pilot testing incorporation of a battery of PRO measures into routine care for patients with MBC at Johns Hopkins in order to gain experience that will guide future broader implementation of PROs across our program. Participants complete the PROs on paper at baseline (BL), 3, and 6 months (mo). Measures include NCCN Distress Thermometer (BL only), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), PRO-CTCAE Insomnia questions and a modified version of the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (r-ESAS) questionnaire with 3 extra symptom domains. Project team members alert clinicians by email of scores that exceed severity thresholds as follows – Distress: ≥4, PHQ-8: ≥8, GAD-7: ≥10, any item on r-ESAS: ≥4 and PRO-CTCAE Insomnia: severe/very severe or quite a bit/very much. Results: From May 29, 2020 and April 5, 2021, 67 patients were approached for participation, and 40 (59.7%) completed the BL PROs. Median age was 64 (range 36-85). Most participants were White (70%), non-Hispanic (90%) and had hormone receptor-positive (93%) MBC. At BL, 22 (55%) had visceral disease and most were receiving endocrine-based regimens [21 (53%)] or chemotherapy [16 (40%)]. 27 (68%) participants had ≥1 BL alert. The most common BL alerts were for symptoms on the r-ESAS [23 participants (58%)]. The most frequent items on the r-ESAS for which participants had BL alerts were pain, tiredness, well-being, tingling/numbness and rash. Other BL alerts were: Distress [9 participants (23%)], PRO-CTCAE Insomnia [5 participants (13%)], PHQ-8 [4 participants (10%)] and GAD-7 [2 participants (5%)]. To date, 24 of 35 (69%) and 15 of 28 (54%) participants who have reached the 3 and 6 mo time points have completed the respective follow-up (FU) PROs. Most common FU alerts to date are on the r-ESAS [3 mo: 14 participants (58%), 6 mo: 9 participants (60%)]. The project team has successfully notified providers of all alerts to date. Clinical actions (phone calls, provider visits and/or referrals) have been taken within 30 days of notification for > 75% of alerts. Conclusions: Implementation of a PRO battery for patients receiving routine care for MBC led to detection of a range of symptoms, the majority of which were clinically actionable. Restrictions on in-person interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to low rates of PRO completion in this pilot project. Prior to broader implementation, we will consider strategies such as an electronic platform and a shorter battery to enhance patient engagement.

E2112: Randomized Phase III Trial of Endocrine Therapy Plus Entinostat or Placebo in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

PURPOSE

Endocrine therapy resistance in advanced breast cancer remains a significant clinical problem that may be overcome with the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors such as entinostat. The ENCORE301 phase II study reported improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the addition of entinostat to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane in advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

E2112 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study that enrolled men or women with advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer whose disease progressed after nonsteroidal AI. Participants were randomly assigned to exemestane 25 mg by mouth once daily and entinostat (EE) or placebo (EP) 5 mg by mouth once weekly. Primary end points were PFS by central review and OS. Secondary end points included safety, objective response rate, and lysine acetylation change in peripheral blood mononuclear cells between baseline and cycle 1 day 15.

RESULTS

Six hundred eight patients were randomly assigned during March 2014-October 2018. Median age was 63 years (range 29-91), 60% had visceral disease, and 84% had progressed after nonsteroidal AI in metastatic setting. Previous treatments included chemotherapy (60%), fulvestrant (30%), and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (35%). Most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the EE arm included neutropenia (20%), hypophosphatemia (14%), anemia (8%), leukopenia (6%), fatigue (4%), diarrhea (4%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Median PFS was 3.3 months (EE) versus 3.1 months (EP; hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.13; P = .30). Median OS was 23.4 months (EE) versus 21.7 months (EP; hazard ratio = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.21; P = .94). Objective response rate was 5.8% (EE) and 5.6% (EP). Pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed target inhibition in entinostat-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of exemestane and entinostat did not improve survival in AI-resistant advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Assessing financial toxicity in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A single institution experience during the COVID-19 pandemic

176

Background: Assessment of financial toxicity (FTox) is recommended as a component of comprehensive supportive care for patients with metastatic cancer. FTox is common in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and is associated with poor quality of life. Available data suggest many patients with cancer have faced financial hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We evaluated FTox using the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) measure in patients with MBC at Johns Hopkins clinical sites. Respondents were patients with MBC who completed the COST measure as part of the baseline assessment for one of two IRB-approved quality improvement projects initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic: 1) a pilot project evaluating incorporation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures into routine care (RC), and 2) a needs assessment prior to attending a multi-disciplinary clinic (MultiD-C) focusing on supportive care. COST scores range from 0-44 with higher scores indicating better financial well-being. FTox was graded as: Grade 0 (G0): >26, Grade 1 (G1): >14-26, Grade 2 (G2): >0-14 and Grade 3 (G3): 0. Results: 40 patients with MBC completed the COST measure May 2020 through April 2021 as a component of RC and 17 patients with MBC completed the COST measure September 2020 through May 2021 in advance of anticipated attendance at the MultiD-C. Median age (range) for RC and MultiD-C respondents was 64 (36-85) and 55 (37-75) years, respectively. 4 (10%) and 4 (24%) of RC and MultiD-C respondents respectively reported household income < $50,000. The majority of respondents in both groups were White [RC: 28 (70%), MultiD-C: 14 (82%)], non-Hispanic [RC: 36 (90%), MultiD-C: 16 (94%)], had more than high school education [RC: 37 (93%), MultiD-C: 17 (100%)] and all were insured. 27 (68%) of RC respondents and 11 (65%) of MultiD-C respondents were receiving oral cancer therapies. COST scores and grading are shown in the Table. Approximately half of the respondents in each group reported their illness has been at least “a little bit” of a financial hardship [RC: 22 (55%), Multi-D: 8 (47%)]. Conclusions: Patients with MBC receiving care during the COVID-19 pandemic frequently report FTox. Implementation of routine assessment for FTox via PRO measures and identification of strategies to support patients with MBC experiencing FTox are priorities both during the pandemic and beyond.[Table: see text]

Who are the women who enrolled in the POSITIVE trial: A global study to support young hormone receptor positive breast cancer survivors desiring pregnancy

Background

Premenopausal women with early hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer receive 5–10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) during which pregnancy is contraindicated and fertility may wane. The POSITIVE study investigates the impact of temporary ET interruption to allow pregnancy.

Methods

POSITIVE enrolled women with stage I-III HR + early breast cancer, ≤42 years, who had received 18–30 months of adjuvant ET and wished to interrupt ET for pregnancy. Treatment interruption for up to 2 years was permitted to allow pregnancy, delivery and breastfeeding, followed by ET resumption to complete the planned duration.

Findings

From 12/2014 to 12/2019, 518 women were enrolled at 116 institutions/20 countries/4 continents. At enrolment, the median age was 37 years and 74.9 % were nulliparous. Fertility preservation was used by 51.5 % of women. 93.2 % of patients had stage I/II disease, 66.0 % were node-negative, 54.7 % had breast conserving surgery, 61.9 % had received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy. Tamoxifen alone was the most prescribed ET (41.8 %), followed by tamoxifen + ovarian function suppression (OFS) (35.4 %). A greater proportion of North American women were <35 years at enrolment (42.7 %), had mastectomy (59.0 %) and received tamoxifen alone (59.8 %). More Asian women were nulliparous (81.0 %), had node-negative disease (76.2%) and received tamoxifen + OFS (56.0 %). More European women had received chemotherapy (69.3 %).

Interpretation

The characteristics of participants in the POSITIVE study provide insights to which patients and doctors considered it acceptable to interrupt ET to pursue pregnancy. Similarities and variations from a regional, sociodemographic, disease and treatment standpoint suggest specific sociocultural attitudes across the world.

•

Fertility and pregnancy are priority concerns for young breast cancer survivors.

•

POSITIVE explores a transient interruption of endocrine therapy to allow conception.

•

Patients' characteristics highlight features considered suitable to study enrolment.

•

Overall, patients enrolled had a relatively high median age and low-risk disease.

•

Variations emerged across continents suggesting specific sociocultural attitudes.

Randomized Phase III Postoperative Trial of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

PURPOSE

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high-risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine. Preclinical models support the use of platinum agents in the TNBC basal subtype. The EA1131 trial hypothesized that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in patients with basal subtype TNBC treated with adjuvant platinum compared with capecitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinical stage II or III TNBC with ≥ 1 cm RD in the breast post-NAC were randomly assigned to receive platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles or capecitabine 14 out of 21 days every 3 weeks for six cycles. TNBC subtype (basal v nonbasal) was determined by PAM50 in the residual disease. A noninferiority design with superiority alternative was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% with capecitabine.

RESULTS

Four hundred ten of planned 775 participants were randomly assigned to platinum or capecitabine between 2015 and 2021. After median follow-up of 20 months and 120 iDFS events (61% of full information) in the 308 (78%) patients with basal subtype TNBC, the 3-year iDFS for platinum was 42% (95% CI, 30 to 53) versus 49% (95% CI, 39 to 59) for capecitabine. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more common with platinum agents. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial as it was unlikely that further follow-up would show noninferiority or superiority of platinum.

CONCLUSION

Platinum agents do not improve outcomes in patients with basal subtype TNBC RD post-NAC and are associated with more severe toxicity when compared with capecitabine. Participants had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment, highlighting the need for better therapies in this high-risk population.

A randomized phase III post-operative trial of platinum-based chemotherapy (P) versus capecitabine (C) in patients (pts) with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC): ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

605

Background: Pts with TNBC who have residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of NAC have a very high risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine (C). Pre-clinical models support the use of platinum agents (P) in the TNBC basal subtype. EA1131 tested the hypothesis that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in pts with basal subtype TNBC after NAC with the adjuvant use of a P instead of C (primary objective). Methods: Pts with clinical stage II/III TNBC post neoadjuvant taxane +/- anthracycline-based chemotherapy with at least 1 cm RD in the surgical specimen were randomized (1:1) to receive P (carboplatin or cisplatin once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles) or C (14/7d every 3 weeks for 6 cycles). TNBC subtype (basal vs. non-basal) was analyzed in the surgical specimen by PAM50. A non-inferiority design (non-inferiority margin of hazard ratio [HR] of 1.154) with superiority alternative (alternative HR of 0.754) was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% for the C arm. Non-inferiority was tested first. If non-inferiority was shown, a formal test for superiority of P compared to C would be conducted. Results: 401 participants were randomized to P or C between 2015 and 2020 (recruitment goal, 775), 310 (77%) had TNBC basal subtype disease (primary analysis population). Pts’ median age was 52 years, 71% were White and 19% Black. At diagnosis, most tumors were high grade (78%), T2 (59%), 47% N0, and 40% N1. Residual tumors were 37% ypT1, 44% ypT2, and 47% ypN0. Overall incidence of any toxicity was similar (83% with P, 80% with C), but grade 3 and 4 toxicities (no grade 5) were more common with P (25% vs 15%). After median follow-up of 18 months, 113 iDFS events (58% of full information) had occurred. 3-year iDFS for P arm was 40% (95%CI, 29%-51%) and 44% (95%CI, 32%-55%) for C arm. The HR for arms P/C was 1.09 (95% Repeated Confidence Interval, 0.62-1.90) and the probability of eventually rejecting the null of inferiority (i.e., conditional power) was 6%. The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial at the 5th interim analysis in March 2021 since it was unlikely that the trial would be able to show non-inferiority or superiority of the P arm. Conclusions: Participants with TNBC with RD after NAC had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment. Available data show that it is very unlikely that the study would be able to establish non-inferiority of P to C. In addition, severe toxicities were more common with P. In pts with TNBC, particularly basal subtype, with at least 1 cm RD after NAC and high-risk of recurrence, adjuvant P use does not improve outcomes. Correlative analyses of RD tissue (NGS), circulating markers (ctDNA and CTC pre/post treatment), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires will now occur. Clinical trial information: NCT02445391.

Predictors of non-receipt of first-line CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

1016

Background: CDK4/6i improve survival outcomes for first-line treatment of patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor-2 negative (HER2-) MBC. Yet, not all eligible patients (pts) receive a first-line CDK4/6i. We sought to describe factors associated with not receiving a first-line CDK 4/6i among MBC pts treated at our institution. Methods: Retrospective cohort of pts with HR+, HER2- MBC diagnosed between May 1, 2015 and June 30, 2019 treated at Johns Hopkins clinic sites in Baltimore City (BCi), Baltimore County (BCo), and Washington DC (DC). Primary outcome was receipt of a first-line CDK 4/6i. Clinical and demographic factors were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Patient zip-code was used to define a low-income neighborhood (LIN) as an area where >10% of households have median income below the federal poverty level. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models (determined using a stepwise model selection approach) were performed to identify factors associated with not receiving a first-line CDK 4/6i. Results: Of the 211 pts in the cohort, 203 (96.2%) were female, 133 (63%) were White, and 53 (25%) were Black. Median age was 58 yrs (range 25-90 yrs). 26% of pts had de novo MBC and 44% had visceral disease at diagnosis. About half, 104 (49%), were privately insured, 83 (49%) had Medicare, and 15 (7.1%) had managed care plans including Medicaid. 118 (56%), 43 (20%), and 50 (24%) pts were treated in BCi, BCo, and DC respectively. 60% (n=126) of pts received a first-line CDK 4/6i and there was a trend of increased utilization over time with 39% of pts receiving first-line CDK4/6i in 2015 and 67% in 2019. On univariate analysis, LIN, clinic site, and year of MBC diagnosis (2015-2017 vs 2018-2019) were associated with first-line CDK4/6i use. The multivariable model included age, race, clinic site, LIN, and year of MBC diagnosis. In this model, pts treated in BCi were 58% less likely to receive first-line CDK 4/6i compared to those treated in BCo (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.95). Those diagnosed with MBC in 2017 or later were 2.6 times more likely to receive first-line CDK4/6i than those diagnosed prior (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.45-4.83). Those who lived in a LIN were 39% less likely to receive first-line CDK4/6i vs those in a non-LIN, though this was no longer statistically significant (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.32-1.13). Conclusions: We identified disparities in the use of CDK4/6i for first-line treatment of MBC. Lower use was observed among pts who received care at our urban Baltimore city site with a trend towards lower use among pts from lower-income neighborhoods. These findings highlight potential barriers with accessing oral cancer therapies - cost, patient distrust, and/or systemic bias. Further work is needed to delineate the multi-level factors contributing to these disparities and to develop resources to overcome these barriers and achieve equitable utilization of these drugs.

Factors associated with weight gain during endocrine therapy for breast cancer

12076

Background: Weight gain is common after a breast cancer diagnosis. The incidence of and risk factors for weight gain during adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) are poorly described. Limited data support an association between emergent symptoms and weight gain after a breast cancer diagnosis. Methods: We enrolled women with stage 0-III breast cancer initiating ET in a prospective clinic-based cohort. We assessed symptoms with the FACT-ES and PROMIS pain interference, depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance and physical function measures at baseline (BL), 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months (mo). We defined emergent symptoms at 3 and/or 6 mo as worsening of 4 points from BL on PROMIS measures and 5 points from BL on the FACT-ES. We abstracted weight and menopausal status from charts. The primary outcome of this secondary analysis was weight gain (dichotomized as ≥5% vs < 5% of body weight compared to BL) through 60 mo. We evaluated the association between weight gain during ET and menopausal status. We also evaluated the associations between clinicodemographic factors and emergent symptoms with weight gain and if these associations differed by menopausal status. We performed logistic regression modeling with GEE to account for the longitudinal design. We identified a multivariable model for the set of factors associated with weight gain among pre-menopausal women taking ET. Results: 309 of 321 participants with BL and ≥1 follow-up (FU) weight were included. 263 (85%) had stage I-II disease, 99 (32%) were pre-menopausal, 259 (84%) were White and 32 (10%) were Black. Prior to ET, 45% had mastectomy, 66% had radiation, and 28% received chemotherapy. 4% of pre- and 82% of post-menopausal participants initiated an aromatase inhibitor (AI); all others initiated tamoxifen (Tam). 17% of pre-menopausal participants received ovarian suppression. At BL, 75% of Black and 59% of White participants were overweight/obese. With a median FU of 56 mo, 51% of pre- and 34% of post-menopausal participants gained ≥5% body weight (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.13, p < 0.001). For each PRO measure, > 20% of participants had emergent symptoms. Worsening of physical function and pain interference scores at 3 and/or 6 mo were differentially associated with weight gain according to menopausal status (interaction p-values ≤0.05). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with weight gain among pre-menopausal participants were ET (AI vs Tam) (OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.90- 8.77, p = 0.08), prior mastectomy (OR 2.06, 95% CI 0.89-4.77, p = 0.09), emergent pain interference (OR 2.49, 95% CI 0.99-6.24, p = 0.05) and race (White vs other) (OR 7.13, 95% CI 1.29-39.4], p = 0.02). Conclusions: Weight gain during ET for breast cancer is more frequent among pre-menopausal than post-menopausal women. Worsening pain soon after ET initiation, receipt of AI, prior mastectomy and race may identify pre-menopausal women at risk for weight gain for whom prevention strategies are a priority.

The impact of weight loss on physical function and symptoms in overweight or obese breast cancer survivors: results from POWER-remote

PURPOSE

In pre-planned observational analysis of the POWER-remote trial, we examined the impact of weight loss on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized a priori that survivors with ≥ 5% weight loss would have improved physical function (PF) at 6 months vs. those who did not.

METHODS

Patients with stage 0-III breast cancer who completed local therapy and chemotherapy with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² were randomized to POWER-remote (telephone coaching; diet/activity tracking) or self-directed weight loss (booklet). Participants completed PROs at baseline, 6, and 12 months: PROMIS PF, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep; FACT-endocrine symptoms; MOS-sexual function. Changes in PROs among those with ≥ 5% weight loss vs. those with < 5% were tested with multivariable mixed effect models, across randomized groups.

RESULTS

Of 94 women who completed PROs, 84 and 69 participants were evaluable at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Regardless of intervention, PF improved in those with ≥ 5% weight loss vs. those with < 5% at 6 months (4.4 vs. 0.3 points; p = 0.02) and 12 months (3.6 vs. 0 points; p = 0.04). While endocrine symptoms, fatigue, and anxiety improved at 6 months in those who lost ≥ 5%, differences were not significant vs. those who lost < 5%. There was no significant change within or between groups in sexual function, depression, or sleep. Findings at 12 months were similar, except pain improved in those losing ≥ 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the benefits of weight loss in overweight/obese breast cancer survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Weight management in breast cancer survivors may improve PF.

Abstract P37: Impact of Onset-To-Treatment Time on Hospital Discharge Destination After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage - The REDDISH Study

Background and aims: Rapid access to specialised care improves outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) but there is limited evidence on the optimal time-to-treatment. We investigated onset-to-treatment time and hospital discharge destination in aSAH.

Methods: Consecutive first-ever aSAH patients were retrospectively identified from multiple overlapping sources in two comprehensive cerebrovascular referral centres between 2010-2016. Onset-to-treatment time (hours from onset of symptoms to treatment to secure aneurysm), clinical characteristics, and neurological complications (NINDS classifications) were extracted by clinical data collectors from medical records. Among survivors, we estimated the effect of continuous onset-to-treatment on hospital discharge destination (i.e. home vs. rehabilitation/other hospital as proxy for functional recovery) using logistic regression with adjustment for gender, treatment type (clipping or coiling), hospital presentation (direct admission or transfer), and severity (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale, modified Fisher scale). Non-linear effects were investigated using natural cubic splines.

Results: Among 402 survivors at discharge, there was a strong non-linear effect of onset-to-treatment time on odds of being discharged home compared to discharge to rehabilitation independent of severity, gender, treatment type and transfer (see Figure). The greatest benefit to discharge home was evident with treatment at up to 12.5 hours but the benefit remained at up to 20 hours post-onset.

Conclusions: aSAH Treatment occurring within 12.5 hours led to greater discharge to home. Our use of continuous modelling provides clarity around optimal treatment times for aSAH to guide clinical practice.

Abstract PS9-58: Factors associated with sexual problems during adjuvant endocrine therapy

Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces recurrence and mortality in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Sexual problems are common during AET but are under-reported and under-treated in routine clinical care. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) improve clinician awareness of patient symptoms. We present an analysis of prospectively collected PRO from a clinic-based registry of women with HR+ BC receiving AET with the aim of identifying factors associated with developing or worsening sexual problems.

Methods: Women with stage 0-III BC initiating AET were enrolled in a prospective clinic-based registry Mar 2012-Dec 2016. Participants completed PRO surveys at baseline (BL) and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months (mo). Sexual problems were evaluated by the MOS Sexual Problems (MOS-SP) measure (range 0-100; higher scores indicate more sexual problems). Respondents rate severity of problems in 4 domains of sexual function on a 4-point scale (“not a problem”, “a little of a problem”, “somewhat of a problem” and “very much a problem”). We considered participants who responded “somewhat of a problem” or “very much a problem” for ≥1 domain to have a sexual problem at that time point. Based on the empirical rule effect size method, we defined clinically significant developing or worsening sexual problems during AET as an increase in MOS-SP score by ≥8 from BL. Women with MOS-SP score &gt;92 at BL were excluded. Other PRO surveys were the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) scale and NIH PROMIS measures for pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, physical function (PF) and sleep disturbance. We evaluated associations between worsening of PROMIS T-scores in 4-point increments and FACT-ES score in 5-point increments with change in the MOS-SP score by ≥8. Additional covariates were clinical and demographic factors including socioeconomic status (SES). We used neighborhood poverty (NP) rate &gt;15% as a surrogate for low SES based on US census estimates of the % of persons in a zip code below the federal poverty line. We performed logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for repeated observations. The final multivariable model was determined with a forward stepwise selection algorithm.

Results: Among 300 participants, 195 (65%) were post-menopausal, 252 (84%) white and 30 (10%) black, 134 (45%) on tamoxifen and 166 (55%) on an aromatase inhibitor. Stage distribution was 0: 28 (9%); I: 180 (60%); II-III: 92 (31%). Prior to ET, 132 (44%) had mastectomy, 84 (28%) had chemotherapy and 199 (66%) had radiation (RT). 40 (13%) were of low SES. Median follow-up is 56 mo. 165 (55%) participants reported ≥1 sexual problem during participation. At BL, median MOS-SP score was 8.32 (range 0-92). There was no significant change in mean MOS-SP score from BL to 48 mo (p=0.74). In univariate analyses, worsening scores on all PRO measures were associated with increase in MOS-SP score by ≥8, however on multivariate analysis, only worsening endocrine symptoms (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21-1.48, p&lt;0.001) and PF (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.99-1.18, p=0.06) were retained in the final model. Clinical variables in the final model associated with increase in MOS-SP score by ≥8 were mastectomy (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.19-3.36, p=0.01) and RT (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.05-3.16, p=0.03). Women of low SES were less likely to have increase in MOS-SP score by ≥8 (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.98, p=0.04). Age, race, stage and type of ET were not associated with developing or worsening sexual problems.

Conclusions: Women receiving AET at risk for developing or worsening sexual problems include those with worsening endocrine symptoms and worsening PF plus those who have undergone mastectomy or RT. Routine assessment for sexual problems in this population may reduce under-detection and identify women who can benefit from interventions to improve sexual function.

Citation Format: Neha Verma, Amanda L. Blackford, David Lim, Elissa Thorner, Jennifer Lehman, Claire Snyder, Caroline A. Snyder, Vered Stearns, Karen L. Smith. Factors associated with sexual problems during adjuvant endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-58.

Abstract PS9-14: Feasibility of monitoring symptoms during endocrine therapy with patient reported outcomes collected via smart phone app

Background: Despite known benefits in reducing breast cancer (BC) recurrence and death, up to 50% of patients discontinue endocrine therapy (ET) early. Symptoms are often cited as a reason for early ET discontinuation (DC). The symptom burden during ET captured by patient reported outcomes (PRO) exceeds that captured by clinicians. Methods: We initiated a single arm pilot trial evaluating symptom monitoring during ET with PRO collected via smart phone app. Eligible patients are women starting ET for stage 0-III BC. Participants receive text message reminders to complete surveys at baseline (BL), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (mo). Participants who do not complete 2 sequential surveys may opt out of further surveys. Surveys include PROMIS measures for anxiety, depression, fatigue and the vaginal discomfort domain of sexual function plus PRO-CTCAE measures for concentration, memory, hot flashes, joint pain and vaginal dryness. PROMIS measures are scored by T-score look up tables. PRO-CTCAE responses are reported on a 5 point scale (0-4). Severe or worsening scores trigger email alerts to clinicians as follows: T-scores ≥70 or ≥5 points worse than BL for anxiety, depression, and fatigue; T-score ≥65 or ≥5 points worse than BL for sexual function; scores ≥3 or ≥2 points worse than BL on PRO-CTCAE measures. Recommended management pathways are provided to clinicians upon alert acknowledgement. The primary endpoint is feasibility, with success defined as ≥65% of participants completing the BL survey and ≥65% of participants completing ≥1 follow-up (FU) survey during the first 6 mo of ET. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported symptoms and pathway-concordant symptom management based on chart review. We report here descriptive statistics of the observed data to date and multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with BL survey completion. Results: From Feb 2019 to May 2020, 213 of 250 planned participants enrolled. Median FU is 5.7 mo. Mean age is 58.3 years (SD 11.7). 154 (72.3%) participants are white (W) and 32 (15%) are black (B). 189 (88.7%) participants have stage I-II BC. Prior to initiating ET, 82 (39%) had mastectomy, 75 (35.2%) had chemotherapy and 135 (63.4%) had radiation. 138 (64.8%) initiated an aromatase inhibitor and 72 (33.8%) initiated tamoxifen. BL survey completion rate is 73.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67.3-79.5%). To date, 69.3% (95% CI 60.5-77.2%) of participants completed ≥1 FU survey during the first 6 mo of ET. 25.2% of participants opted out of participation within 6 mo. On multivariate analysis, race was associated with BL survey completion. By race, BL survey completion rate was: 77.9% (W) and 62.5% (B). Mean scores on PROMIS depression, anxiety, fatigue, and sexual function measures at BL, 1 mo, and 3 mo were +/- 0.5 SD of population means. Compared to BL, mean PRO-CTCAE scores for joint pain severity and hot flash frequency worsened at 1 and 3 mo and mean PRO-CTCAE score for vaginal dryness severity worsened at 3 mo (p&lt;0.05). 28% of participants had alerts at BL. Most common BL alerts were joint pain and hot flashes. To date, 79.7% of participants had ≥1 alert on a FU survey. Most common FU alerts were joint pain, hot flashes and fatigue. Median number of alerts per participant per FU survey is 1 (range 0-5). To date, clinicians acknowledged 29.8% of alerts within 7 days and made pathway-concordant management recommendations within 30 days for 39.4% of alerts. Conclusion: Monitoring symptoms during ET using PRO collected via smart phone app is feasible. Symptoms are common during ET. Updated data, including factors associated with survey completion, clinician response to alerts and the association between PRO scores and early ET DC, will be reported at the conference. These data will be used to design a randomized trial to evaluate symptom monitoring via smart phone app to reduce early ET DC.

Citation Format: Karen L Smith, Chenguang Wang, David Lim, Amanda Montanari, Raquel Nunes, Mary J. Wilkinson, Jennifer Y. Sheng, Rima Couzi, John Fetting, Carol Riley, Antonio C. Wolff, Cesar A. Santa-Maria, Katie Papathakis, Lauren Collins-Chase, Christie Hilton, Claire Snyder, Elissa Thorner, Dara Z. Ikejiani, Molly Steimer, Vered Stearns. Feasibility of monitoring symptoms during endocrine therapy with patient reported outcomes collected via smart phone app [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-14.

Abstract GS4-02: E2112: Randomized phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy plus entinostat/placebo in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group

Background: Endocrine therapy resistance in advanced breast cancer remains a significant clinical problem that may be overcome with use of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors such as entinostat. The ENCORE 301 randomized phase II study reported an improvement in progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the addition of entinostat to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane in patients with advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Protein lysine acetylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was associated with prolonged PFS in the entinostat arm.

Methods: E2112 is a multicenter randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study that enrolled men or women with advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer whose disease had progressed on a non-steroidal AI in the adjuvant or metastatic setting (NCT02115282). Study participants were also required to have an ECOG performance status 0-1 with measurable or non-measurable (limited to 20% of the study population) disease. One prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and prior treatment with fulvestrant and a CDK4/6 inhibitor was permitted but not required. Participants received exemestane 25mg po daily and entinostat (EE)/placebo (EP) 5mg po every week. Primary endpoints were PFS (central review) and OS. One-sided type 1 error 0.025 was split between two hypothesis tests: 0.001 for PFS test and 0.024 for OS. PFS tested in the first 360 pts, 88.5% power to detect 42% reduction in the hazard of PFS failure (median PFS, 4.1 to 7.1 months); OS tested in all 600 pts, 80% power to detect 25% reduction in the hazard of death (median OS, 22 to 29.3 months). Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR), and changes in protein lysine acetylation status in PBMCs (CD3+ T cells, CD14+ monocytes, CD19+ B cells, pan-leukocyte marker CD45+ cells, CD56+ NK cells) between C1D1 and C1D15 (integrated biomarker).

Results: A total of 608 participants were randomized between March 2014 and October 2018 (305 EE, 303 EP), 98% enrolled in USA. Characteristics were well balanced between the arms. Median age was 63 years (range, 29-91), 99% female, 95% postmenopausal, 80% white and 15% black. A majority (84%) had disease resistant to AI in the metastatic setting at study entry, 78% had measurable disease and 60% visceral disease. Prior treatments included chemotherapy (60%), fulvestrant (30%), CDK4/6 inhibitor (35%), everolimus (3%). Median prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range, 0-4) and endocrine therapy was 2 (range, 1-7); in adjuvant/metastatic setting. Grade 3/4 adverse events in EE arm included neutrophil count decreased (20%), hypophosphatemia (14%), anemia (8%), white blood cell decreased (6%), fatigue (4%), diarrhea (4%), and platelet count decreased (3%). At final analysis, median PFS was 3.3 months (EE) versus 3.1 months (EP) (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.13, p=0.30). Median OS was 23.4 months (EE) versus 21.7 months (EP) (HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.21, p=0.94). ORR was 4.6% (EE) and 4.3% (EP). The median fold change in lysine acetylation in PBMCs was approximately 1.5 in EE arm, and 1 in EP arm. Participants on EE had significantly higher increase in lysine acetylation by C1D15 than patients on EP (397 paired samples available for analysis, p&lt;0.001 for all). Additional biomarker analyses will be presented at time of meeting.

Conclusion: The combination of exemestane and entinostat did not improve survival in AI resistant advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed target inhibition in entinostat-treated patients.

Citation Format: Roisin M Connolly, Fengmin Zhao, Kathy D Miller, Min-Jung Lee, Richard L Piekarz, Karen L Smith, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Jennifer S Winn, Bryan A Faller, Adedayo A Onitilo, Mark E Burkard, George T Budd, Ellis G Levine, Melanie E Royce, Peter A Kaufman, Alexandra Thomas, Jane B Trepel, Antonio C Wolff, Joseph A Sparano. E2112: Randomized phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy plus entinostat/placebo in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-02.

Abstract PS12-17: Baseline characteristics of women enrolled in the POSITIVE trial (pregnancy outcome and safety of interrupting therapy for women with endocrine responsIVE breast cancer)

Background: Pregnancy is a major concern for young breast cancer (BC) survivors. Conception after BC in women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) disease is affected by the standard 5-10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) during which pregnancy is contraindicated and fertility may be waning. The POSITIVE Trial (IBCSG 48-14/BIG 8-13/Alliance A221405/NCT02308085) investigates the impact of temporary ET interruption to allow pregnancy.

Methods: POSITIVE enrolled premenopausal women with stage I-III HR+ early BC, ≤42 years of age, who had received adjuvant ET (SERM alone, ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus SERM or AI) for 18 to 30 months, and wished to interrupt ET to attempt pregnancy. An interruption of ET for up to 2 years was foreseen to allow pregnancy (after a 3-month ET washout period), delivery, and breastfeeding if desired/feasible. Resumption of ET to complete 5-10 years of treatment was planned as soon as pregnancy/breastfeeding was completed or after it was ensured conception was not possible. We report baseline characteristics of participants enrolled in POSITIVE by region of enrollment.

Results: From 12/2014 to 12/2019, 518 participants were enrolled at 116 centers in 20 countries across 4 continents. The table shows the baseline characteristics of the enrolled women.

Several differences were seen across regions: A higher proportion of participants &lt;35 yrs (43%) enrolled in North America than in Europe (33%) or Asia (26%). Eighty-one percent of Asian women had no children at enrollment compared to 75% and 68% of European and North American women, respectively. Consistently, a greater percent of women in Asia (56%) had used fertility preservation measures, compared to Europe (53%) and North America (43%). Stage distribution was also different across continents: a greater percent of Asian participants had stage I, grade 1 and node-negative disease (51%, 29% and 76 %, respectively) compared to European (46%, 14% and 67%) and North American (43%, 16% and 55%) women. Only 19% of Asian women had either 1-3 positive nodes and grade 3 tumors, the proportion increased to 28% and 35% in Europe and to 41% and 38% in North America, respectively. North American women were more likely to have had mastectomy (60% vs. Asian (44%) and European (41%)); European women were more likely to have had chemotherapy (69% vs. North American (56%) and Asian (42%)). ET administration prior to enrollment differed substantially by region: Most North American women had SERM (T) alone (58%), and when OFS was added to oral ET, it was combined with AI in 19% and with T in 8% of participants, respectively. In Asia most women received T + OFS (55%), followed by T alone (36%), and AI + OFS (6%). In Europe, T + OFS was the most frequent treatment (40%), followed by T alone (37%) and AI + OFS (17%). Median duration of ET before enrollment was similar across regions (22-24 months).

Conclusion: Regional variation of baseline characteristics of women enrolled in the POSITIVE trial may provide important insights into different medical and sociocultural attributes and attitudes of the study participants and investigators from those regions.

Affiliation: POSITIVE Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Breast International Group, North American Breast Cancer Group

CharacteristicRegion: Europe / North America / Asia-Pacific61% / 23% / 16%Median age at enrollment, yrs (IQR)37 (33-39)Caucasian race77%No children prior to enrollment74%Prior fertility preservation measures taken51%Stage I / II46% / 45%0 / 1 positive nodes65% / 21%Grade 2 / 348% / 33%HER2-negative74%Mastectomy46%Chemotherapy61%ET: SERM alone / SERM+OFS / AI+OFS41% / 35% / 16%Median duration of prior ET, mos (IQR)23 (20-27)

Citation Format: Ann H Partridge, Samuel M Niman, Monica Ruggeri, Fedro A Peccatori, Hatem A Azim, Jr, Marco Colleoni, Cristina Saura, Chikako Shimizu, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Judith Kroep, Ellen Warner, Virginia F Borges, Andrea Gombos, Akemi Kataoka, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Simona Borstnar, Hideko Yamauchi, Jeong Eon Lee, Janice M Walshe, Manuel Ruíz Borrego, Halle CF Moore, Christobel Saunders, Fatima Cardoso, Snezana Susnjar, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Karen L Smith, Martine Piccart, Larissa A Korde, Aron Goldhirsch, Richard D Gelber, Olivia Pagani. Baseline characteristics of women enrolled in the POSITIVE trial (pregnancy outcome and safety of interrupting therapy for women with endocrine responsIVE breast cancer) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS12-17.

Long-term follow-up assessment of cardiac safety in SAFE-HEaRt, a clinical trial evaluating the use of HER2-targeted therapies in patients with breast cancer and compromised heart function

PURPOSE

HER2-targeted therapies are associated with cardiotoxicity which is usually asymptomatic and reversible. We report the updated cardiac safety assessment of patients with compromised heart function receiving HER2-targeted therapy for breast cancer, enrolled in the SAFE-HEaRt trial, at a median follow-up of 3.5 years.

METHODS

Thirty patients with stage I-IV HER2-positive breast cancer receiving trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab, or ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), with asymptomatic LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) 40-49%, were started on cardioprotective medications, with the primary endpoint being completion of HER2-targeted therapy without cardiac events (CE) or protocol-defined asymptomatic worsening of LVEF. IRB-approved follow-up assessment included 23 patients.

RESULTS

Median follow-up as of June 2020 is 42 months. The study met its primary endpoint with 27 patients (90%) completing their HER2-targeted therapies without cardiac issues. Of the 23 evaluable patients at long-term f/u, 14 had early stage breast cancer, and 9 had metastatic disease, 8 of whom remained on HER2-targeted therapies. One patient developed symptomatic heart failure with no change in LVEF. There were no cardiac deaths. The mean LVEF improved to 52.1% from 44.9% at study baseline, including patients who remained on HER2-targeted therapy, and those who received prior anthracyclines.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up of the SAFE-HEaRt study continues to provide safety data of HER2-targeted therapy use in patients with compromised heart function. The late development of cardiac dysfunction is uncommon and continued multi-disciplinary oncologic and cardiac care of patients is vital for improved patient outcomes.

542. SARS CoV-2-Associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome of Children (MIS-C) in the Washington DC Metropolitan Region

Background

Background: Multi-system Inflammatory Syndrome of Children (MIS-C) has recently emerged internationally as a serious inflammatory complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection with significant morbidity for the pediatric population.

Methods

This observational retrospective cohort study includes 33 children meeting CDC criteria for MIS-C treated between March 15 and June 17, 2020 at Children’s National Hospital in Washington DC. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from medical records and are summarized.

Results

Of 33 hospitalized MIS-C patients, 42% were critically ill, and 58% were non-critically ill. The median age was 8.9 years (0.7–18.7 years). More males (58 %) than females (43 %) were represented in the MIS-C cohort. The majority (75%) of children had no underlying medical condition. Criteria for incomplete or complete Kawasaki Disease (KD) were present in 39% of patients, while an additional 9% had some features of KD. However the remaining 52% of MIS-C patients presented with other sub-phenotypes including prominent severe abdominal pain and/or nonspecific multiorgan dysfunction. 30% presented with shock requiring volume and/or inotropic support. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were present in 61% of patients. Virus was detectable by PCR in 36% of patients. At the time of initial evaluation, 39% (13/33) of children had identified cardiac abnormalities including myocardial dysfunction (5/33; 15%), coronary ectasia (4/33; 12%), coronary aneurysm (3/33; 9%), or pericardial effusion 5/33; 15%) either alone or in combination. Cytokine profiling identified elevation of several cytokines in this cohort, including IL-6. Treatment has included intravenous immunoglobulin, aspirin, anakinra and other immunomodulatory therapies, with overall rapid response to therapy. No deaths have occurred.

Conclusion

The emergence of MIS-C late in the surge of SARS-CoV-2 circulation in the Washington DC metropolitan region has added to the already significant burden of hospitalized and critically ill children in our region. A significant percentage of these children present with cardiac dysfunction and abnormalities, whether or not with KD features at presentation. Detailed characterization of immune responses and long term outcome of these patients is a priority.

Disclosures

Andrea Hahn, MD, MS, Johnson and Johnson (Consultant)

544. Severe COVID-19 in Children and Young Adults in the Washington DC Metropolitan Region

Background

Children and young adults were initially reported as largely spared from severe complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but the impact to this population has been significant.

Methods

This observational retrospective cohort study includes 420 symptomatic children and young adults with lab confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection treated between March 15 and June 16, 2020 at Children’s National Hospital in Washington DC. We identified and compared cohorts of non-hospitalized (N=324) and hospitalized (N=96) patients, including non-critically ill (N=64) and critically ill hospitalized (N=32) patients. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from medical records

Results

Of 420 SARS-CoV-2-infected symptomatic patients, 23% required hospitalization, of which 67% were non-critically ill and 33% were critically ill. All age groups were represented in the symptomatic cohort, with a median age of 8.6 years. Patients &gt; 15 years of age represented 44% of critical care admissions. Males and females were equally represented in all cohorts. Underlying medical conditions were present in 36%, but more common in hospitalized (59 %) and critically ill (66 %) patients. The most frequent underlying diagnosis overall was asthma (16 %), but also included neurologic (6 %), diabetes (3 %), obesity (3 %), cardiac (3 %), hematologic (3 %) and oncologic (1 %) conditions. The majority (66 %) of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients presented with respiratory symptoms with or without fever. Other symptoms were also present, including diarrhea/vomiting (21 %), myalgia (11 %), chest pain (8 %) and loss of sense of smell or taste (7%). Hospitalized patients required varying levels of respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation, BiPAP, RAM cannula and HFNC. Additional presentations included diabetic hyperglycemia, sickle cell vaso-occlusive crisis, vascular complications, and multisystem inflammation. Treatment included remdesivir, convalescent plasma, tocilizumab and other therapies.

Conclusion

Although children/young adults have been less affected than elderly adults, the impact of SARS-CoV2 on this population has been significant in Washington DC and informs other regions anticipating their surge.

Disclosures

Andrea Hahn, MD, MS, Johnson and Johnson (Consultant)