POS0681 DRUG RETENTION RATE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF JAK INHIBITOR IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFICULT-TO-TREAT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background

Recently, the disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was improved due to the ‘treat-to-target’ strategy. However, some patients remain various symptoms despite recommended treatment was performed. Then, the term of ‘difficult-to-treat RA (D2TRA)’ is widely recognized. Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) might be effective for D2TRA patients, because JAKi can simultaneously block the function of multiple cytokines.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate drug retention rate and effectiveness of JAKi in patients with D2TRA.

Methods

This study included 220 RA patients (tofacitinib 101, baricitinib 83, upadacitinib 20, peficitinib 14, filgotinib 2) treated with JAKi. Sixty-two patients were treated as first line bDMARDs/JAKi (1st group), 57 patients were treated as second line bDMARDs/ JAKi (2nd group), 101 patients were treated as third and more bDMARDs/ JAKi. In these 101 patients, 25 patients did not met D2TRA criteria (non-D2TRA group) and 76 patients met D2TRA criteria (D2TRA group). Drug retention rate and effectiveness of JAKi were evaluated during 24 weeks in each group.

Results

Usage rate of methotrexate was lower and dosage of glucocorticoid was higher in D2TRA group than in other groups (Table 1). Drug retention rate at 24 weeks was 87.1% (54/62) in 1st group, 80.1% (46/57) in 2nd group, 88% (22/25) in non-D2TRA group, 61.8% (47/76) in D2TRA group. Drug retention rate was lower in D2TRA group compared to 1st group, 2nd group and non-DT2RA group (p<0.01, p=0.03, p=0.01). DAS28-CRP was 4.4, 4.0, 3.9, 4.4 at baseline, 3.0, 3.0, 3.3, 3.5 at 4 weeks, 2.5, 2.9, 2.7, 3.3 at 12 weeks, 2.5, 3.0, 2.9, 3.2 at 24 weeks in 1st group, 2nd group, non-D2TRA group and D2TRA group, respectively. Improvement ratio of DAS28-CRP was 32.9, 27.6, 20.4, 19.3 % at 4 weeks, 40.8, 26.5, 28.1, 19.5 % at 12 weeks, 40.8, 24.6, 18.7, 24.7 % at 24 weeks. DAS28-CRP was improved in all groups. Altough 1st group showed higher improvement ratio of DAS28-CRP at 24 weeks compared to 2nd group, non-DT2RA group and D2TRA group (p<0.01, p<0.01, p<0.01), there was no differences between DT2RA group and 2nd group or non-D2TRA group (p=0.95, p=0.48). SDAI was 22.9, 19.9, 18.3, 23.9 at baseline, 11.8, 11.9, 13.3, 14.4 at 4 weeks, 7.9, 11.3, 8.4, 13.3 at 12 weeks, 8.5, 11.5, 9.7, 12.6 at 24 weeks. CDAI was 21.3, 18.8, 17.6, 21.8 at baseline, 11.3, 11.2, 12.5, 13.9 at 4 weeks, 7.5, 10.9, 8.0, 12.3 at 12 weeks, 8.1, 10.7, 8.6, 12.1 at 24 weeks. HAQ was 1.15, 0.99, 0.89, 1.39 at baseline, 0.84, 0.76, 0.93, 1.22 at 4 weeks, 0.79, 0.84, 0.77, 1.17 at 12 weeks, 0.76, 0.79, 0.76, 1.14 at 24 weeks. Improvement rate of HAQ at 24 weeks were 44.3%, 23.9%, 21.2%, 8.1%.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of RA patients

1st group (n=62)2nd group (n=57)non-D2TRA group (n=25)D2TRA group (n=76)Age (years)64.9 ± 14.866.1 ± 11.564.6 ± 16.163.0 ± 15.0Female (%)75.879.096.080.3Disease durations (years)10.4 ± 11.717.6 ± 17.622.6 ± 22.416.3 ± 15.7RF (IU/ml)296.3 ± 1153.8314.9 ± 1037.7262.4 ± 375.9305.9 ± 819.6RF positive ratio (%)81.878.479.275.7Anti CCP antibody (U/ml)221.8 ± 327.2157.8 ± 258.795.9 ± 101.6191.8 ± 250.6Anti CCP antibody positive ratio (%)79.679.672.283.3CRP (U/ml)1.5 ± 2.11.1 ± 2.01.6 ± 1.61.8 ± 2.9MMP-3 (ng/ml)185.7 ± 167.6146.7 ± 122.1190.1 ± 152.6268.0 ± 451.2DAS28-CRP4.3 ± 1.24.1 ± 1.33.9 ± 1.44.4 ± 1.3SDAI21.8 ± 12.221.7 ± 13.118.4 ± 13.023.9 ± 12.8CDAI20.3 ± 11.320.7 ± 12.717.6 ± 12.822.1 ± 12.2HAQ1.1 ± 0.81.2 ± 1.00.9 ± 0.81.4 ± 1.1MTX use (%)69.463.25647.4MTX (mg/day)10.7 ± 3.410.4 ± 3.58.8 ± 3.59.0 ± 4.3Glucocorticoid use (%)29.136.81646.1Glucocorticoid dose (mg/day)3.3 ± 2.13.0 ± 1.53.5 ± 1.95.1 ± 2.8

Conclusion

Drug retention rate of JAKi in treatment of D2TRA group were lower than that of 1st group, 2nd group, and non-D2TRA group. Clinical efficacy of JAKi in D2TRA group were not significantly different to 2nd group and non-D2TRA group. However, HAQ improvement was weak in D2TRA group.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0188 ULTRASONOGRAPHIC RESIDUAL INTRA-ARTICULAR SYNOVITIS IS MORE SEVERE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH PREDNISOLONE

Background

The treatment option including biological DMARDs (BIO) and JAK inhibitor (JAK) was expanded, and the number of patients reached to the treatment target are increasing in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). On the other hand, it is also true that some patients are still using prednisolone (PSL). Recently, ultrasound has played a role of sensitive imaging modality in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with RA. It is known that residual synovitis was found in ultrasound even in patients with clinical remission.

Objectives

We investigated the differences of ultrasonographic intra-articular synovitis findings between treatment drugs in patients with RA.

Methods

From January 2017 to August 2020, 750 RA patients who underwent ultrasound examination were included. A US examination was performed at the bilateral first to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, first interphalangeal (IP) and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, wrist joints (three part of radial, medial and ulnar) and first to fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, by using HI VISION Ascendus (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Japan) with a multifrequency linear transducer (18-6 MHz). The gray scale and power Doppler findings were assessed by the semi-quantitative method (0-3). All patients were divided into with or without BIO / JAK, methotrexate (MTX) and PSL. Then, patients were matched using the propensity score adjusted for gender, age, RA disease duration, disease activity, CRP value, and MMP-3 value. The total gray scale and power Doppler score (GSUS / PDUS) were compared between treatment drugs of RA by using propensity score matching methods.

Results

The average age of 750 RA patients were 64.5 years and an average disease duration of RA was 13.9 years and females were 581 (77.5%). There were 517 patients (68.9%) treated with BIO/JAK and 233 patients treated without BIO/JAK. The 205 patients in each group were matched. GSUS were 10.6±11.1 vs 9.2±10.4 (p=0.218) and PDUS 7.4±9.2 vs 6.5±9.0 (p=0.328). Ultrasound residual synovitis was not different between with or without BIO/JAK in matched patients. There were 525 patients (70.0%) treated MTX, the average MTX dose was 9.3 mg, and 225 patients treated without MTX. The 203 patients with or without MTX in each group were matched. GSUS were 9.7±10.6 vs 11.4±12.0 (p=0.119) and PDUS 6.6±8.8 vs 8.1±10.1 (p=0.117). Ultrasound residual synovitis was not different between with or without MTX in matched patients. There were 111 patients (14.8%) treated PSL, the average dose was 4.0mg, and 639 patients treated without PSL. The 105 patients with or without PSL in each group were matched. GSUS were 15.7±13.9 vs 11.6±10.6 (p=0.018) and PDUS 11.5±11.4 vs 8.1±9.6 (p=0.021). Ultrasound residual synovitis was more severe treated with PSL than without PSL in matched patients.

Conclusion

In a comparison between RA patients matched backgrounds such as disease activity, there was no difference in ultrasound residual synovitis between patients with or without BIO/JAK and MTX. However, there was significant difference in patients with or without PSL. This suggests that PSL use suppresses clinical symptoms but does not improve synovitis. Thus, it should be noted that joint destruction may progress in patients treating with PSL.

References

[1]Grassi W, Okano T, Di Geso L, Filippucci E. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: options, uses and optimization. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:1131-46.

[2]Nguyen H, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gandjbakhch F, Constantin A, Foltz V, Cantagrel A. Prevalence of ultrasound-detected residual synovitis and risk of relapse and structural progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53:2110-8.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama, Tomoko Nishimura for clinical assistant, Setsuko Takeda, Emi Yamashita, Yuko Yoshida, Emi Ohtani, Yuka Domae, Asami Yagami, Shingo Washida for their special efforts as a sonographer and collecting data.

Disclosure of Interests

Tadashi Okano Speakers bureau: Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Abbvie, Amgen, Ayumi, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, Grant/research support from: Asahi Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Yutaro Yamada: None declared, Koji Mandai: None declared, Shohei Anno: None declared, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Kentaro Inui Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd.,, Tatsuya Koike Speakers bureau: Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Abbott Japan, Teijin Pharma, Banyu Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical, Hiroaki Nakamura: None declared

AB0340 SHORTENING THE DOSING INTERVAL OR DOSE ESCALATION OF BIOLOGICAL DMARDs SUPPRESSED RESIDUAL ULTRASOUND SYNOVITIS AND JOINT DESTRUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS -STARBOARD STUDY-

Background

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have residual synovitis even after using biological disease modified anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARDs), joint destruction may progress1,. The enhanced treatment such as shortening the dosing interval or dose escalation of bDMARDs are recommended for these patients, if allowed in package inserts 2, 3.

Objectives

We investigated the effects of enhanced treatment in RA patients with residual synovitis under treatment with standard dose of bDMARDs.

Methods

Forty RA patients treated with standard dose of infliximab, tocilizumab or golimumab were included in this study. Ultrasound (US) examination was performed at the bilateral first to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, first interphalangeal (IP) and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, wrist joints (three parts of radial, medial and ulnar) and first to fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, by using HI VISION Ascendus (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Japan) with a multifrequency linear transducer (18-6 MHz). Residual synovitis was defined as Power Doppler score (PD) ≥2. In patients with residual synovitis, we recommended enhanced treatment. The patients were divided into 3 groups, PD≥2/ET+ group (patients agreed enhanced treatment), PD≥2/ET- group (patients rejected enhanced treatment), and PD<2 group. We assessed ultrasound (PD score), laboratory data (CRP, MMP-3), disease activity (Simplified Disease Activity Index; SDAI), physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire; HAQ), and joint destruction (modified Total Sharp Score; mTSS) at baseline and 1-year follow-up.

Results

There were 9 patients in PD≥2/ET+ group and 31 patients in PD<2 group. PD≥2/ET+ group had significantly higher SDAI (p=0.027), MMP-3 (p=0.005), and PD (p<0.001) at baseline compared with PD<2 group, but their MMP-3 (p=0.019) and PD (p=0.042) were significantly decreased over 1 year. PD≥2/ET+ group had joint destruction before ET (p=0.022), but it was suppressed after ET and there was no significance in change in mTSS compared with PD<2 group (p>0.99) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Disease activity, ultrasound assessment and radiographic change from baseline (BL) to 1-year follow-up in RA patients with residual synovitis who had enhanced treatment (PD≥2/ET+) and those without active synovitis (PD<2).

*Each parameter at BL and 1-year was statistically analyzed by Wilcoxin signed rank test only in PD≥2/ET+ group.

**Difference in two groups at BL was statistically analyzed by Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test.

SDAI: simplified disease activity index, HAQ: health assessment questionnaire, PD: Power Doppler, MMP-3: matrix metalloproteinase 3, mTSS: modified Total Sharp Score.

Conclusion

In RA patients with the residual synovitis under treatment with standard dose of bDMARDs, enhanced treatment decreased the synovitis and suppressed the joint destruction.

References

[1]Nguyen H, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gandjbakhch F, Constantin A, Foltz V, Cantagrel A. Prevalence of ultrasound-detected residual synovitis and risk of relapse and structural progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Nov;53(11):2110-8.

[2]Ogata A, Tanaka Y, Ishii T, Kaneko M, Miwa H, Ohsawa S; SHINOBI study group. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase III study of shortening the dosing interval of subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to subcutaneous tocilizumab every other week: Results of the 12-week double-blind period. Mod Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;28(1):76-84.

[3]Takeuchi T, Miyasaka N, Tatsuki Y, Yano T, Yoshinari T, Abe T, Koike T. Baseline tumour necrosis factor alpha levels predict the necessity for dose escalation of infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jul;70(7):1208-15.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0229 ACHIEVING GLUCOCORTICOID FREE MIGHT DECREASE RISK FOR CLINICAL FRACTURES IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS - TEN-YEAR FINDINGS FROM THE TOMORROW STUDY

Background

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have muscle weakness and stiff or painful joints might be at increased risk of falls and fractures.

Objectives

The present study prospectively investigates correlations between decreasing doses of glucocorticoid (GC) and the incidence of clinical fractures in patients with RA based on the ten-year findings of the TOMORROW study (UMIN000003876) that started in 2010.

Methods

We evaluated anthropometric parameters, bone mineral density, disease activity, RA medication, and the incidence of clinical fractures over a period of ten years in 202 patients with RA (mean age, 58.6 years; mean disease duration, 14.0 years). We also investigated the effects of GC doses on the incidence of clinical fractures over the same period in patients with RA using multivariate regression analysis.

Results

The incidence of clinical fractures for ten years in patients with RA was 0.036/person-year. There were 89 patients (44.1%) treated with GC at least once during ten years. The incidences of clinical fractures in patients with RA treated with and without GC during ten years were 0.052 and 0.026/person-year, respectively. After adjusting for fracture risk factors including age, sex, smoking, and body mass index, cox proportional hazard model revealed that GC dose of ≥ 2 mg/day at baseline was a significant risk factor for clinical fractures (Hazard ratio [HR]:2.430; 95%CI, 1.040-5.675, p=0.040). Although the risk for clinical fractures did not decrease by just reducing the dose of GC (HR:4.505; 95%CI, 0.589-34.457, p=0.147), it was significantly lower if the dose of GC could be reduced to zero during ten years (HR:0.407; 95%CI, 0.194-0.857, p=0.018).

Conclusion

Medication with even low dose of GC are apparently significantly associated with an increased frequency of clinical fractures among patients with RA. However, if the dose of GC was reduced to free during ten years, the clinical fracture risk could become lower. We concluded that we should decrease the dose of GC to free after controlling disease activity of RA.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0290 THE EFFECTS OF TREATMENT RESPONSE AND RISK FACTOR TO INHIBIT THE CLINICAL RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFICULT-TO-TREAT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH IL-6 RECEPTOR INHIBITOR, ABATACEPT AND JAK INHIBITOR

Background

Recently, the disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was improved due to the ‘treat-to-target’ strategy. However, some patients remain various symptoms despite recommended treatment was performed. Then, the term of ‘difficult-to-treat RA (D2TRA)’ is widely recognized. It is unknown how the difference of type of biological disease-modifying anti rheumatic dugs (bDMARDs)/Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) will affect clinical efficacy in patients with D2TRA. Moreover, the risk factor to inhibit the clinical response in patients with D2TRA is unknown.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment response in patients with D2TRA who were treated with interleukin 6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri), abatacept and JAKi.

Methods

This study used the multicenter database included 673 RA patients treated with bDMARDs/JAKi (tocilizumab 240, sarilumab 67, abatacept 146, tofacitinib 101, baricitinib 83, upadacitinib 20, peficitinib 14, filgotinib 2). Two hundred forty-two patients were treated as first line bDMARDs/JAKi (IL-6Ri 117, abatacept 63, JAKi 62), 211 patients were treated as second line bDMARDs/JAKi (IL-6Ri 117, abatacept 37, JAKi 57), 220 patients were treated as third and more bDMARDs/JAKi. In these 220 patients, 82 patients did not meet D2TRA criteria (IL-6Ri 42, abatacept 15, JAKi 25) and 138 patients met D2TRA criteria (IL-6Ri 31, abatacept 31, JAKi 76). In all patients, we analyzed 138 patients with D2TRA (113 female, mean age was 63.1 ± 13.7 years). Drug retention rate and effectiveness of bDMARDs/JAKi in patients with D2TRA were evaluated for 24 weeks. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to clarify the risk factors to inhibit the clinical response.

Results

Drug retention rate of patients with D2TRA at 24 weeks was 67.7% in IL-6Ri group, 74.2% in abatacept group, 61.8% in JAKi group. Drug retention rate in patients with D2TRA was not different between groups (IL-6Ri vs abatacept: p=0.86, IL-6Ri vs JAKi group: p=0.39, abatacept vs JAKi group: p=0.33). DAS28-CRP at 4, 12, 24 weeks decreased in all group (Figure 1). Abatacept showed lower improvement ratio of DAS28-CRP at 24 weeks compared to IL-6Ri group (IL-6Ri vs abatacept: p<0.01, IL-6Ri vs JAKi: p=0.1, abatacept vs JAKi: p=0.07). Good responder (defined as decrease in DAS28-CRP score > 1.2 with a score < 3.2) was 52.4% patients in IL-6Ri, 17.4% patients in abatacept, 29.8% patients in JAKi. SDAI and CDAI at 4, 12, 24 weeks decreased in all group (Figure 1). There were no diferences between the groups in improvement ratio of SDAI (IL-6Ri vs abatacept: p=0.11, IL-6Ri vs JAKi: p=0.81, abatacept vs JAKi: p=0.08) and CDAI (IL-6Ri vs abatacept: p=0.31, IL-6Ri vs JAKi: p=0.82, abatacept vs JAKi: p=0.13) at 24 weeks. HAQ was 1.42, 1.15, 1.39 at baseline, 1.27, 1.07, 1.22 at 4 weeks, 1.17, 1.07, 1.17 at 12 weeks, 1.26, 1.06, 1.14 at 24 weeks in IL-6Ri group, abatacept and JAKi, respectively. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that high HAQ (β=0.28, p=0.02) and high dosage of glucocorticoid (β=0.67, p<0.01) inhibited the improvement of DAS28-CRP. Type of bDMARDs/JAKi (β=-0.09, p=0.36) did not affect the DAS28-CRP improvement for 24 weeks.

Table 1.

Multivariate linear regression analysis of risk factor to inhibit the clinical response in patients with D2TRA.

β95% CIpAge (years)-0.037-0.025, 0.0170.74male-0.047-0.788, 0.4860.64Disease durations (years)-0.048-0.028, 0.0170.63RF (IU/ml)-0.082-0.0004, 0.00020.41Anti CCP antibody (U/ml)0.111-0.0005, 0.0020.26DAS28-CRP-0.063-0.265, 0.1420.55HAQ0.2790.059, 0.7170.02MTX (mg/day)0.136-0.018, 0.0810.21Glucocorticoid dose (mg/day)0.6690.174, 0.324< 0.01Type of bDMARDs/JAKi-0.088-0.415, 0.1510.36

Conclusion

Drug retention rate and clinical efficacy of D2TRA patients were not different among IL-6Ri, abatacept and JAKi. DT2RA patient with functional disorder and high dosage of glucocorticoid were risk factor to inhibit the clinical response.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0225 FRAX ASSESSMENT IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PREDICTED THE REAL INCIDENCE OF CLINICAL FRACTURES FOR 10 YEARS FROM THE RESULTS OF THE 10-YEAR TOMORROW STUDY

Background

To investigate if FRAX in patients with RA can predict the incidence of new clinical fractures for 10 years by using the 10-year data of the TOMORROW study (UMIN000003876) which is a prospective cohort study.

Objectives

To investigate if FRAX in patients with RA can predict the incidence of new clinical fractures for 10 years by using the 10-year data of the TOMORROW study (UMIN000003876) which is a prospective cohort study.

Methods

We calculated ten-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (FRAX) in 208 RA patients and 205 sex- and age-matched volunteers (Vo), and compared FRAX with the incidence of clinical fractures for 10 years.

Results

The mean FRAX were 14.5 and 8.8% in 175 RA patients and 168 Vo, respectively, in whom we could calculate FRAX at baseline and complete to investigate the incidence of clinical fractures for 10 years from baseline. The mean FRAX in RA patients was significantly higher than that in Vo (P<0.001). The actual incidence of clinical fractures for 10 years in RA patients was significantly higher than that in Vo (33.9 vs 22.9%, P=0.031). In both groups, the actual incidence of clinical fractures was higher than FRAX prediction. Logistic regression analysis revealed that FRAX and FRAX≧15% were the significant risk factors for clinical fractures for 10 years in both groups (Odds ratio (OR), 1.055, P<0.001, 2.943, P=0.043, respectively). The mean FRAX in RA patients with and without clinical fractures for 10 years were 18.5 and 12.5%, respectively (P=0.002). In RA patients, FRAX was also the significant risk factor for clinical fractures (OR, 1.046, P=0.004).

Conclusion

FRAX and the incidence of clinical fractures for 10 years were significantly higher in RA patients than them of Vo. We confirmed that FRAX was the risk factor for clinical fractures in actual clinical practice.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0405 JAK INHIBITORS IMPROVE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES SUCH AS PAIN AND HAQ EARLIER THAN ANTI-IL-6 INHIBITORS

Background

Clinical feature of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor is recognized as not only suppress inflammation but also improve patient-reported outcomes (PRO) such as pain and health assessment questioner (HAQ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This representative clinical feature was known as a results of phase 3 trial compared to TNF inhibitor. One of the mechanisms of JAK in RA is to suppresses interleikin-6 (IL-6). However, the effect for PRO in JAK inhibitor compared to IL-6 inhibitor have not been known.

Objectives

We investigated the effect for patient-reported outcomes such as pain and HAQ in patients with RA treated with JAK inhibitor compared to IL-6 inhibitor.

Methods

This study was analysed a multicenter database included RA patients treated with biological disease-modifying anti rheumatic dugs (bDMARDs) and JAK inhibitors. In 307 patients treated with IL-6 inhibitor (tocilizumab 240 and sarilumab 67) and 220 patients with JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib 101, baricitinib 83, upadacitinib 20, peficitinib 14 and filgotinib 2), 155 patients were treated as first-line bDMARDs/JAK inhibitor (IL-6R inhibitor 104 and JAK inhibitor 51). In this first-line patients, patients treated with IL-6R inhibitor and JAK inhibitor were matched using the propensity score adjusted for gender, age, RA disease duration, baseline charactristics of disease activity, CRP level, and MMP-3 level. The beaseline data and the change of clinical and laboratory data at 4, 12 and 24 weeks were compared between IL-6 inhibitor and JAK inhibitor.

Results

Thirty-six patients in each group were matched and analyzed. The average age was 62.4 and 62.6 years and the average disease duration of RA was 13.2 and 10.1 years in IL-6 inhibitor and JAK inhibitor. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different in both groups. At week 4, tender joint count (TJC) was significantly improved in JAK inhibitor than IL-6 (IL-6: -1.86 vs JAK: -4.12, p= 0.036) and HAQ was significantly improved in JAK inhibitor than IL-6 (IL-6: -0.04 vs JAK: -0.27, p= 0.041). Moreover, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was also improved in JAK inhibitor than IL-6 (IL-6: -6.6 vs JAK: -10.9, p= 0.026) at week 4. However, pain VAS and patient global VAS were not significantly different in each group in week4. TJC, HAQ and CDAI was not different in both groups at week 12 and week 24. On the other hand, ESR was significantly decreased in IL-6 inhibitor than JAK inhibitor at week 4, 12 and 24 (IL-6: -26.6 vs JAK: -14.1, p=0.018 at week 4, IL-6: -32.7 vs JAK: -16.5 p=0.004 at week 12, IL-6: -31.3vs JAK: -17.7 p=0.014 at week 24).

Conclusion

In a comparison between IL-6 inhibitor and JAK inhibitor as a first-line molecular-targeted drug matched baseline charactristics of disease activity, TJC and HAQ was improved in JAK inhibitor earlier than IL-6 inhibitors. JAK inhibitor suppress multi cytokine that might be the reason why JAK inhibitor improve pain. Improvement of patient reported outcome in JAK inhibitor was found also in comparison with IL-6 inhibitor.

References

[1]Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. Baricitinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:652-62.

[2]Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song IH, et al. Upadacitinib Versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1788-1800.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama and Tomoko Nishimura for clinical assistant, and all member of Team RA.

Disclosure of Interests

Tadashi Okano Speakers bureau: Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Abbvie, Amgen, Ayumi, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, Grant/research support from: Asahi Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Tatsuya Koike Speakers bureau: Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Abbott Japan, Teijin Pharma, Banyu Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical, Kentaro Inui Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Masahiro Tada: None declared, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Yutaro Yamada: None declared, kazuki Orita: None declared, Koji Mandai: None declared, Shohei Anno: None declared, Takahiro Iida: None declared, Hiroaki Nakamura: None declared

AB0387 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JAK INHIBITORS AND CREATINE KINASE ELEVATION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A REAL-WORLD CLINICAL STUDY

Background

Some cases of creatine kinase (CK) elevation caused by Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported in clinical trials1. However, the frequency and patients’ background characteristics in clinical practice are unknown.

Objectives

The correlation between JAK inhibitor treatment for RA and changes in CK levels in clinical practice were investigated using a multicenter database.

Methods

The multicenter database of JAK inhibitors was used, and 103 (tofacitinib 46, baricitinib 44, upadacitinib 11, peficitinib 1, filgotinib 1) of 265 RA patients were followed up at 24 weeks, and their CK levels were evaluated. The time-dependent change of CK was evaluated by sex and analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The percentage abnormal from the standard titer was calculated. The factors related to an elevated CK at 24 weeks were investigated using patients’ background characteristics at the time of starting JAK inhibitors by univariate analysis.

Results

Women accounted for 85.4% of the patients, the median age was 68 years, disease duration was 15 years, and the mean DAS28ESR was 5.00. The CK levels of both men and women were significantly elevated at 4 weeks and maintained until 24 weeks (men, women: 63, 62 (0 weeks), 101, 95 (4 weeks), 119, 96 (12 weeks), 155, 99 (24 weeks), U/L, P<0.001) (Figure 1). The percentage abnormal was also significantly increased at 4 weeks and maintained until 24 weeks (5.8% (0 weeks), 20.7% (4 weeks), 26.3% (12 weeks), 24.3% (24 weeks), P=0.002). The factors significantly positively related to elevated CK levels at 24 weeks were male, CK, creatinine, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and stage, class, modified health assessment questionnaire, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and glucocorticoid use were significantly negatively correlated (Table 1). There were no significant differences in CK elevation among the agents.

Table 1.

Characteristics at the time of starting JAK inhibitors related to elevated creatine kinase levels at 24 weeks

UnivariateData at stating JAK inhibitorsR valueP valueCreatine kinase0.653<0.001Gender, men0.2470.012Steinbrocker stage-0.2150.039Steinbrocker class-0.2770.008modified health assessment questionnaire-0.2680.008Creatinine0.2890.003eGFR-0.2310.019LDH0.2010.041Glucocorticoid use-0.4090.008

Analyzed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient

Figure 1.

Time-dependent changes of CK in all RA patients

Conclusion

CK was significantly elevated at 4 weeks and maintained until 24 weeks. However, no patients complained of muscle pain and stopped JAK inhibitors. Patients with high CK, low eGFR, high LDH, or maintained activities of daily living at the time of starting JAK inhibitors tended to have high CK levels at 24 weeks.

References

[1]Fleischmann, R. et al. Upadacitinib Versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) 71, 1788-1800, doi:10.1002/art.41032 (2019).

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1146 ROMOSOZUMAB INCREASE BONE MINERAL DENSITY AT LUMBAR AND FEMORAL IRRESPECTIVE OF PREOSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT, HISTORY OF FRAGILITY FRACTURE AND COMBINATION OF VITAMIN D

Background

Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds sclerostin, increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. Romosozumab has an excellent therapeutic effect on patients with osteoporosis. However, there are few reports investigated the efficacy and the effect of various factors relative to osteoporosis in real-world.

Objectives

We evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism marker (BMM) change in osteoporosis patients treated with romosozumab, and assessed the effect of various factors, such as preosteoporosis treatment, history of fragility fracture and combination of vitamin D.

Methods

This study included 141 osteoporosis patients (132 female, mean age: 78.8 ± 7.5 years, mean hight: 151.1 ± 7.5 cm, mean weight: 50.9 ± 8.9 kg) treated with romosozumab. BMD measurements using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and BMM measurements using N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (P1NP) were evaluated at 0, 4, 6, and 12 months after treatment. DXA were performed at the lumbar spine (n=92), at proximal femoral and femoral neck (n=92), and at distal third radius (n=49). We evaluated the influence of preosteoporosis treatment, history of fragility fracture and combination of vitamin D for BMD change.

Results

BMD at lumbar spine (5.2%: p<0.01, 9.2%: p<0.01, 10.8%: p<0.01), proximal femoral (1.3%: p=0.02, 2.8%: p<0.01, 4.5%: p<0.01) and femoral neck (2.0%: p=0.03, 2.7%: p=0.06, 5.0%: p=0.01) were significantly increased at 4, 8, 12 months after treatment. BMD at distal third radius (-1.5%: p<0.01, -0.8%: p=0.17, -1.0%: p=0.13) were not increased at 4, 8, 12 months after treatment. P1NP chane were 63% (p<0.01), 6.4% (p=0.55), -2.3% (p=0.2) at 4, 8, 12 months after treatment. There were no significant differences in 1 year improvement ratio of BMD at lumbar spine, proximal femoral and femoral neck between 38 patients with pretreatment of osteoporosis and 54 patients without pretreatment of osteoporpsis (13.5 vs 9.5%: p=0.1, 4.9 vs 4.4%: p=0.7, 6.1 vs 4.6%: p=0.67), between 33 patients with a history of fragility fracture and 59 patients without a history of fragility fracture (7.3 vs 11.7%: p=0.42, 0.8 vs 5.5%: p=0.08, -0.7 vs 6.6%: p=0.14), between 50 patients with romosozumab alone and 42 patients with romosozumab plus vitamin D (11.3 vs 10.0%: p=0.93, 4.1 vs 5.3%: p=0.59, 6.8 vs 2.3%: p=0.47). There were no significant differences in 1 year improvement ratio of BMD at distal third radius between 33 patients with pretreatment of osteoporosis and 16 patients without pretreatment of osteoporpsis (-1.1 vs -0.9%: p=0.63), between 31 patients with a history of fragility fracture and 18 patients without a history of fragility fracture (-1.5 vs -0.5%: p=0.3).

Conclusion

Romosozumab improved BMD at lumbar and femoral independently regardless of preosteoporosis treatment, history of fragility fracture and combination of vitamin D.

References

[1]Felicia Cosman et al. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1532-1543, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0971 Relationship between walking speed and lower limb skeletal muscle mass in patients with knee joint disorders

Background

Knee joint disorder is one of the factors causing frailty in the elderly, which is associated with a decrease in walking speed.

Objectives

We measured the walking speed of patients scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and examined factors correlated with walking speed.

Methods

The patients with knee disorders scheduled to undergo knee arthroplasty at our hospital between July 2020 and May 2021 were included. They were assessed for basic attributes, clinical assessment including Kness Society Score (KSS), degree of pain on walking by visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and also leg skeletal muscle mass index (SMI; whole-body mode DXA), quadriceps strength by dynamometer with written consent (UMIN ID: 000040940). And Japanese Cardiovascular Health Study criteria for frailty, and sarcopenia by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria were evaluated.

Results

Demographic data of 83 patients (65 women, mean age 74.9 years) included in this study was shown in Table 1. The distribution in frailty is 36.2% and that in sarcopenia is 7.3%. Most of the patients with frailty with knee disorder did not suffer from sarcopenia. A multivariate analysis was conducted with walking speed as the objective variable and the dependent variables as age, gender, pain VAS on walking, KSS, leg SMI, quadriceps strength, and ROM. The results showed that age and ROM in flexion were significantly and independently associated with walking speed (P=0.01, 0.03). Gender, pain VAS on walking, KSS, leg SMI, quadriceps strength, and ROM in extension were not significantly associated with walking speed (P=0.92, 0.11, 0.11, 0.52, 0.85, 0.52).

Conclusion

Among the patients with knee disorders immediately before arthroplasty, frailty was not caused by sarcopenia. Age was found to be the most correlated factor with walking speed, and walking speed became slower with age. In addition, poor flexion angle was also the factor for delayed walking speed, but it did not correlate with lower limb skeletal muscle mass or quadriceps strength. In this study pain on walking was not significant factor for walking speed, because it was observed in most of all cases.

FactorGroup　disease (n)osteoarthritis78 (94%)　rheumatoid arthritis5 (6.0%)body mass index (kg/m2)　25.54 (4.11)pain VAS on walking　37.08 (26.35)total Knee Society Score　77.66 (27.85)range of motion (degree)flexion119.46 (12.88)　extension-9.58 (6.59)quadriceps power (N)　122.00 [53.00, 350.00]waling speed (m/sec)　0.95 (0.33)grip power (kg)　20.24 (6.97)skeletal muscle mass index (kg/m2)appendicular6.50 [4.92, 9.85]　lower limb5.06 [3.76, 7.56]Frailty (n)none10 (12.5%)Pre-frail41 (51.2%)　frail29 (36.2%)Sarcopenia (n)none76 (92.7%)sarcopenia4 (4.9%)　severe sarcopenia2 (2.4%)

mean (standard deviation)

; median [min max]

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0631 EVEN LOW-DOSE GLUCOCORTICOID USE IS A RISK FACTOR FOR CLINICAL FRACTURES IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: TEN-YEAR FINDINGS OF THE TOMORROW STUDY

Background

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have sarcopenia and stiff or painful joints might be at increased risk of falls and fractures.

Objectives

The present study aimed to prospectively identify the incidence of clinical fractures and associated risk factors in patients with RA in a cohort study named the TOMORROW (UMIN000003876) that started in 2010.

Methods

We evaluated anthropometric parameters, bone mineral density (BMD), disease activity, RA medication at entry and observed the incidence of clinical fractures during ten years in 202 patients with RA (mean age, 58.6 y; medication with biological agents, 54.9%) and 202 age- and sex-matched non-RA volunteers (Vo) (mean age, 57.4 y). We compared the incidence of clinical fractures between patients with RA and Vo for ten years, and analyzed the risk factors for clinical fractures using Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

The incidences of clinical fractures were 0.036 and 0.024/person-year in patients with RA and Vo, respectively. Cox proportional hazard model revealed that low BMD at the thoracic vertebrae (< 0.7 g/cm2) and history of fractures at entry were significantly associated with the incidence of clinical fractures (Hazard ratio [HR]1.737, p=0.020 and HR1.514, p=0.047, respectively) in all participants. RA morbidity, however, was not (HR1.398, p=0.112). In patients with RA, medication with GC at entry was a significant risk factor for clinical fractures (HR1.898, p=0.017). Additionally, a mean GC dose (≥ 2 mg/day) at entry and during the ten-year period increased risk for fractures (HR 2.189, p=0.004, 1.866, p=0.022, respectively).

Conclusion

RA per se was not a risk factor for clinical fractures in this cohort. Low BMD at the thoracic vertebrae at entry and the use of GC with even low dose at entry and during ten years were significantly associated with an increased frequency of clinical fractures among patients with RA.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1456-HPR THE SERUM IRON LEVEL MIGHT BE USEFUL IN DETERMINING THE SEVERITY OF MALNUTRITION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, the first international criteria for diagnosis of malnutrition, was released in 2018 [1]. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are thought to be prone to malnutrition due to decreased food intake and increased muscle catabolism caused by chronic inflammation or pain. However, there has been no report to assess the nutritional status of RA patients in accordance with the GLIM criteria. In addition, commonly used blood nutrient indicators such as albumin might not be appropriate as nutritional indicators for RA because these values are affected by inflammation.

Objectives:

This study aims to examine the rates of malnutrition in RA patients according to GLIM criteria, and the relationship between blood nutrient indicators and the severity of malnutrition.

Methods:

In this study, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 135 female RA patients in 2020. According to the GLIM criteria, patients were considered to be malnourished if patients had one of the following phenotypic: (1) low body mass index, (2) non-volitional weight loss, (3) reduced muscle mass, and one of the following etiologic: (1) reduced food intake or assimilation, (2) disease burden/inflammatory condition. Reduced muscle mass was evaluated by measuring calf circumference, and inflammatory condition was evaluated by Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28. In accordance with the GLIM criteria, the severity of malnutrition was judged as three levels: no problem, moderate, and severe malnutrition. Albumin, transthyretin, transferrin, retinol binding protein, zinc, iron, ceruloplasmin, and total cholesterol were assessed as blood nutrition indicators. Also grip strength was assessed. We compared each nutritional indicator among the three groups according to the severity of malnutrition using age-adjusted analysis of covariance, and examined the relationship between each nutritional indicator and the severity of malnutrition using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results:

In RA patients, 20% were classified as severe malnutrition, and 40% were moderate or more. Serum iron levels were significantly lower in the severe malnutrition group compared to the no problem group (p = 0.001). In ROC analysis, serum iron, zinc, albumin, and grip strength (area under curve; AUC; 0.680, 0.696, 0.636, 0.790, respectively) were significant parameters for classification of moderate and severe malnutrition. Serum iron and grip strength (AUC for respective parameters were 0.741, 0.747) were significant parameters for classification of severe malnutrition.

Conclusion:

Evaluation based on the GLIM criteria showed that about 40% of RA patients were under moderate or severe malnutrition. It was suggested that serum iron and grip strength might be useful to predict the severity of malnutrition.

References:

[1]Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition – A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clinical Nutrition 2019; 38: 1-9.

Acknowledgements:

We thank to Tomoko Nakatsuka, and the Center for Drug & Food Clinical Evaluation, Osaka City University Hospital, for management and collection of the study data. We also thank to study participants.

Disclosure of Interests:

Yoshinari Matsumoto Grant/research support from: Yamada Research Grant, Yuko Sugioka: None declared, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Tadasi Okano Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahikasei, Astellas Pharma Inc, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiich Sankyo, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Nipponkayaku, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Kentaro Inui Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Grant/research support from: anssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Daiki Habu: None declared, Tatsuya Koike Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB

POS1059 ULTRASOUND SYNOVITIS, UNLIKE ENTHESITIS OR CLINICAL JOINT ASSESSMENT, IS ASSOCIATED WITH JOINT DAMAGE PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

We previously reported that ultrasound assessment of enthesitis (US enthesitis) is not consistent with tenderness of the enthesis (clinical enthesitis) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Although US enthesitis reflects inflammatory condition and clinical enthesitis is associated with disease activity and physical function, each of them was not associated with joint destruction by cross-sectional analysis1. It is reported that the utility of US for predicting joint destruction remains unclear among patients with PsA2.

Objectives:

This study is aimed to longitudinally investigate the relationships between enthesitis or synovitis and joint damage progression in patients with PsA.

Methods:

Forty-seven patients with PsA (average age of 56.5 years) underwent US and clinical examination of wrist and finger joints and 14 entheses (the bilateral humeral medial epicondyles and insertions of the triceps, distal quadriceps, proximal/distal patella, Achilles tendons, and plantar fascia). Tender or swollen joint count (TJC/SJC), Gray Scale (GS) and Power Doppler (PD) score of the joints, and US/clinical enthesitis counts were calculated. The relationships between the yearly progression in modified total sharp score (ΔmTSS) at two-time points (baseline and average follow-up of 20.4 months) and US or clinical findings were investigated.

Results:

ΔmTSS was significantly correlated with age (r=0.44, p=0.01), joint GS score (r=0.44, p=0.01), and joint PD score (r=0.38, p=0.03). TJC, SJC, inflammatory marker, and disease activity showed no associations with ΔmTSS. US/clinical enthesitis counts also showed no associations with ΔmTSS (Table 1). The joint PD score, adjusted by age, was significant factor for ΔmTSS by multiple regression analysis (b=0.50, p<0.001).

Conclusion:

The joint PD score or US synovitis, unlike clinical joint assessment, was significant predictive factor for joint damage progression. It is important to assess joints by US as well as clinical examination.

References:

1) Yutaro Yamada et al. Ultrasound assessment, unlike clinical assessment, reflects enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020 Apr 17. Online ahead of print.

2) van der Heijde et al. Assessing structural damage progression in psoriatic arthritis and its role as an outcome in research. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020, 22(1): 18.

Table 1.

Univariate analysis of predictive factors for joint damage progression in PsA patients.

mTSS at baselineΔmTSSR valuep valueR valuep valueage0.55<0.0010.440.01PASE0.040.810.120.52PASI-0.250.15-0.010.96DAS28CRP-0.050.750.070.71DAPSA-0.010.94-0.010.97HAQ0.170.27-0.070.73CRP-0.130.380.230.20MMP-30.040.800.290.12biologics use0.190.19-0.110.54Clinical enthesitis counts-0.010.97-0.190.30TJC-0.050.76-0.100.58SJC0.210.180.130.48US enthesitis counts0.120.44-0.130.48joint GS score0.080.600.440.01joint PD score0.080.600.380.03

PsA: psoriatic arthritis, mTSS: modified Total Sharp Score, PASE: Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation, PASI: Psoriasis Area Severity Index, DAPSA: Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis, DAS: Disease Activity Score, CRP: C-reactive protein, HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire, MMP-3: matrix metalloproteinase 3, TJC: tender joint counts, SJC: swollen joint counts, GS: Gray Scale, PD: Power Doppler

Disclosure of Interests:

Yutaro Yamada: None declared, Kentaro Inui Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Eisai, Chigai, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Mitusbishi Tanabe, Pfizer, UCB, Tadashi Okano Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Koji Mandai: None declared, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Tatsuya Koike Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Chugai, Chiharu Tateishi: None declared, Daisuke Tsuruta Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, UCB, Hiroaki Nakamura Grant/research support from: Astellas, Asahi Kasei

POS0532 AveRAGE PREDNISOLONE DOSE OF ONLY 1 MG PER DAY WAS RISK FACTOR FOR CLINICAL FRACTURES IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS - NINE-YEAR FINDINGS OF THE TOMORROW STUDY

Background:

Previous cohort studies showed that the use of prednisolone (PSL) was a risk factor for clinical fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there are few reports on relationship between PSL dose and clinical fractures.

Objectives:

The present study aimed to determine the effect of PSL dose on the incidence of clinical fractures in the RA patients treated with PSL.

Methods:

We evaluated anthropoetric parameters, bone mineral density (BMD), disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), RA medication (methotrexate (MTX) dose, use of biologic disease modified anti-rheumatic-drugs (bDMARDs), and PSL dose) and the incidence of clinical fractures during nine years in RA patients who participant the TOMORROW study (UMIN000003876), which is a 10-years prospective cohort study. Data on clinical fracture was self-reported on the questionnaires. In this analysis, the data of RA patients treated with PSL at least once during nine-year period were evaluated. We analyzed the average dose of PSL until the incidence of the clinical fractures. The risk factor for clinical fractures were analyzed by using Cox proportional hazard model with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and smoking history.

Results:

We analyzed the data of 67 RA patients treated with PSL. Among them, median age was 61.8 year, 56 patients (83.6%) were female, 47 patients (70.1%) were never smoker and median disease duration was 12.1 year. The number of patients treated with PSL at baseline was 48 (69.1%). During 9 years, 23 clinical fractures were observed in 67 patients, and the incidence of clinical fracture was 0.046/person-year. In 19 patients, who were not treated with PSL at baseline but treated with PSL at least once during 9 years, 5 clinical fractures were observed. In 67 RA patients, Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that baseline disease activities, BMD at thoracic vertebrae and medication were not significant risk factors for clinical fractures. However, average PSL dose of more than only 1 mg/day was a significant risk factor for the incidence of clinical fracture (hazard ratio (HR): 2.80; p=0.03) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Adjusted hazard ratio for clinical fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with PSL.

* Adjusted Hazard ratio95% Confidence intervalP valueCRP (mg/dL)1.290.88-1.910.19RF (IU/mL)0.990.99-1.000.07ACPA (U/mL)0.990.98-1.000.18DAS28-ESR0.990.71-1.390.97BMD at thoracic vertebrae (mg/cm2)0.020.00-1.000.05bDMARDs use0.550.23-1.320.18Bisphosphonate use2.330.95-5.710.07average dose of MTX (mg/week)1.020.92-1.120.74average score of DAS28-ESR1.150.76-1.750.52average dose of PSL more than 1mg/day2.81.09-7.240.03

*Hazard ratio was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and smoking history. RF, Rheumatoid factor; ACPA, Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; DAS28-ESR, disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate; BMD, Bone mineral density; bDMARDs, biologic disease modified anti-rheumatic-drugs; MTX, methotrexate; PSL, prednisolone.

Conclusion:

In RA patients treated with PSL, average PSL dose of only 1mg/day significantly increased the risk for the incidence of clinical fractures. Even for established RA patients, continuous use or initiation of low PSL dose was apparently significant risk factor for clinical fractures.

Disclosure of Interests:

Hitoshi Yoshimura: None declared, Tatsuya Koike Grant/research support from: Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Abbott Japan, Teijin Pharma, Banyu Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Yuko Sugioka: None declared, Tadashi Okano: None declared, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Kentaro Inui Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. and Astellas Pharma Inc, Hiroaki Nakamura: None declared

AB0115 COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND FINDINGS BETWEEN TNF INHIBITORS AND NON-TNF INHIBITORS AT FIRST BIOLOGICS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), biologics treatment is one of the effective treatment options. Usually, there is no difference in therapeutic effect regardless of which biologics is used, but the effect for joint synovitis is unknown. Recently, ultrasound (US) has played a role of sensitive imaging modality in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with RA.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to compare the improvement of US findings between TNF inhibitors and non-TNF inhibitors at first biologics in patients with RA.

Methods:

Fifty-four RA patients who started the first biologics from September 2016 to December 2018 were included in this longitudinal study (SPEEDY study, UMIN000028260). All the patients were performed clinical examination, blood test and US examination at baseline, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks. A US examination was performed at the bilateral first to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, first interphalangeal (IP) and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, wrist joints (three part of radial, medial and ulnar) and first to fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, by using HI VISION Ascendus (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Japan) with a multifrequency linear transducer (18-6 MHz). The gray scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) findings were assessed by the semi-quantitative method (0-3). GS score and PD score (both 0-108 points) were defined as the sum of each score. The change of disease activity and US findings were compared between TNF group and non-TNF group.

Results:

Among 54 cases, 32 patients were used TNF inhibitor and 22 were non-TNF inhibitor. Age and duration of RA were significantly higher in the non-TNF group, and MTX dose was significantly lower in the non-TNF group. The baseline inflammatory markers tended to be higher in the non-TNF group and the disease activity was also higher in the non-TNF group. However, the US findings showed no significant difference in both GS and PD between two groups at baseline. US improvement ratio was no difference between TNF group and non-TNF group at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks in both GS and PD score. Regardless of the type of biologics, patients with long-term disease duration tended to have poor improvement in US synovial fingings.

Table 1.

Baseline patient and disease characteristics

TNF (n=32)non-TNF (n=22)P valueFemale patients, n (%)21 (65.6)16 (72.7)0.767Age (years)63.5±15.471.0±9.00.030Disease duration (years)6.5±8.213.0±11.70.032CRP (mg/dl)1.8±2.53.0±3.20.170DAS28-ESR5.0±1.45.8±1.20.022GS score26.1±18.831.8±21.10.313PD score17.6±11.423.1±14.60.150Figure 1.

GS and PD improvement ratio at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks

Conclusion:

There was no difference in the US findings improvement between patients with TNF inhibitor and non-TNF inhibitor at first biologics in patients with RA.

References:

[1]Grassi W, Okano T, Di Geso L, Filippucci E. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: options, uses and optimization. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:1131-46.

[2]Nishino A, Kawashiri SY, Koga T, et al. Ultrasonographic Efficacy of Biologic andTargeted Synthetic Disease-ModifyingAntirheumatic Drug Therapy in RheumatoidArthritis From a Multicenter RheumatoidArthritis Ultrasound Prospective Cohort in Japan. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70:1719-26.

Acknowledgements:

We wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama, Tomoko Nakatsuka for clinical assistant, Setsuko Takeda, Emi Yamashita, Yuko Yoshida, Rika Morinaka, Hatsue Ueda and Tomomi Iwahashi for their special efforts as a sonographer and collecting data.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0466 RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PER SE IS NOT RISK FACTOR FOR CLINICAL FRACTURES: NINE-YEAR FINDINGS OF THE TOMORROW STUDY

Background:

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have sarcopenia and stiff or painful joints might be at increased risk of falls and fractures.

Objectives:

The present study aimed to prospectively identify the incidence of clinical fractures and associated risk factors in patients with RA in a cohort study named the TOMORROW (UMIN000003876) that started in 2010.

Methods:

We evaluated anthropometric parameters, bone mineral density (BMD), disease activity, RA medication at baseline and observed the incidence of clinical fractures during nine years in 202 patients with RA (mean age, 58.6 y; medication with biological agents, 54.9%) and 202 age- and sex-matched non-RA volunteers (mean age, 57.4 y). We compared the incidence of clinical fractures between patients with RA and controls for nine years, and analyzed the risk factors for fractures using Cox proportional hazard model.

Results:

The incidence of clinical fractures in RA patients was significantly higher compared to controls (27.5 vs 18.3%, p=0.04). However, Cox proportional hazard model, adjusted by age, sex, smoking and body mass index, revealed that low BMD at thoracic vertebrae (< 0.7 g/cm2) significantly associated to the incidence of clinical fractures (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86, p=0.02), but not RA morbidity (HR 1.47, p=0.10) (Table 1). Among patients with RA, low BMD at the thoracic vertebrae (< 0.7 g/cm2) was the most prominent risk factor for clinical fractures (HR, 2.66, p=0.02) (Table 1). Although the use of glucocorticoid (GC) at baseline (HR, 1.68, p=0.09) was not a significant risk factor for fractures, a mean GC dose (≥ 2 mg/day) at entry increased risk for clinical fractures in the patients (HR, 1.91, p=0.04) (Table 1).

Conclusion:

RA per se was not a risk factor for clinical fractures in this cohort. Low BMD at the thoracic vertebrae and the use of GC with even low dose at entry were apparently significant risk factors for the incidence of clinical fractures among patients with RA.

Disclosure of Interests:

Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Tatsuya Koike Grant/research support from: Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation,

Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Abbott Japan, Teijin Pharma, Banyu Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical, Yutaro Yamada: None declared, Tadashi Okano: None declared, Yuko Sugioka: None declared, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Kentaro Inui Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Hiroaki Nakamura: None declared

AB0583 FRAILTY IN THE PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE WAS NOT CAUSED BY SARCOPENIA

Background:

Osteoarthritis of the knee (knee OA) decreases mobility of the elderly, which function could be significantly improved with artificial joint replacement in many cases. Successful results of the surgery depend on several factors including preoperative muscle strength of lower limbs.

Objectives:

We assessed morbidity and skeletal muscle mass and strength in patients with knee OA immediately before undergoing arthroplasty and investigated the relationship between impairment of mobility and skeletal muscle function.

Methods:

All patients scheduled to undergo knee arthroplasty at our hospital after July 2020 were assessed for basic attributes, clinical assessment, blood tests, radiography, whole-body mode DXA, knee muscle strength by dynamometer with written consent (UMIN ID: 000040940). And Japanese Cardiovascular Health Study criteria for frailty, and sarcopenia by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria were evaluated.

Results:

Among 46 patients (40 women, mean age 75.4 years) the overall distribution in frailty is no: 15.9%, pre-frailty: 56.8%, and frailty: 27.3%. That in sarcopenia is no: 91.3%, yes: 2.2%, and severe: 4.3%. Ninety-one % of the patients with frailty did not suffer from sarcopenia. Between the patients with frailty and those without frailty there was a significant difference in walking speed (0.71±0.29m/sec, 1.12±0.29m/sec; p=0.004 adjusted by age and sex). Meanwhile, between those 2 groups of patients no significant differences were observed in skeletal muscle mass (6.40±0.87 kg/m2, 6.59±1.09 kg/m2; p=0.35) and knee extension power (120.4±37.4 N, 143.7±67.9 N; p=0.88) adjusted by age and sex. Together with these results, decrease in lower limb motor functions of the patients with knee OA was not caused by sarcopenia. In other words, improvement of mobility in the patients with knee OA could be expected by surgical intervention because of pain relief and ROM improvement.

Conclusion:

In the patients with knee OA immediately before arthroplasty, frailty was not caused by sarcopenia.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

SAT0044 ADIPOCYTOKINE FLUCTUATES WITH INFLAMMATORY MARKERS OR DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS FROM FIVE-YEAR DATA OF TOMORROW STUDY

Background:

Leptin and adiponectin have been thought to be adipocytokines that promote or suppress inflammation, respectively.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between adipocytokine and inflammatory markers or disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using 5-year data of TOMORROW study which is a cohort study and started from 2010.

Methods:

We evaluated inflammatory markers, disease activity score (DAS)-CRP, medication and levels of adipocytokines in 202 patients with RA (mean age, 58.6 y; medication with biological agents, 54.9%) and 202 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (controls; mean age, 57.4 y). We eventually compared leptin or adiponectin concentrations in 183 RA patients and 190 controls from 2010 (BL) to 2015 (5Y) and investigated the relationship between adipocytokines and CRP or DAS in patients by using Spearman correlation analysis.

Results:

The levels of leptin and adiponectin in patients were significantly higher than controls at all time points. Adiponectin level of patients significantly increased from BL to 5Y compared to controls (Table 1). In patients, adiponectin showed significant negative correlation with CRP at both of BL and 5Y (BL:R=-0.174, 5Y:R=-0.240; p<0.05), however, not with DAS at BL and 5Y. Leptin positively correlated with CRP at 5Y(R=0.207; p<0.05), but not with CRP at BL or DAS at any time. Adiponectin levels at BL and 5Y were significantly higher in biologics users at BL and significantly increased from BL to 5Y compared to patients without biologics. No association between leptin levels and the use of biologics (Table 2).

Conclusion:

The level of adiponectin in RA patients with continuous treatments for 5 years increased, and the trend was more pronounced in biologics users. These results might indicate that adiponectin is a cytokine involved in anti-inflammatory effects.

Disclosure of Interests:

Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Kentaro Inui Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd.,, Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tadashi Okano Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Nipponkayaku, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahikasei, Astellas Pharma Inc, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiich Sankyo, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma and UCB, Yuko Sugioka: None declared, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Tatsuya Koike Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Hiroaki Nakamura Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc. and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co.

AB0215 EARLY IMPROVEMENT OF THE POWER DOPPLER SIGNAL CAN PREDICT TO CONTINUE THE BIOLOGICAL DMARDS AFTER 1 YEAR

Background:

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), biologics treatment is one of the effective treatment options. On the other hand, the effects of biologics cannot be obtained satisfactorily in all patients, and there are some cases in which treatment is interrupted due to ineffective or adverse events. However, the useful predictive markers of the biologics have not been found in the early phase of treatment in RA. Recently, ultrasound (US) has played a role of sensitive imaging modality in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with RA.

Objectives:

In this study, we investigated whether continuation of biologics treatment can be predicted by ultrasonographic findings in the early phase.

Methods:

Fifty-four RA patients who started the first biologics from September 2016 to December 2018 were included. All the patients were performed clinical examination, blood tests and US examination of hand and foot at baseline, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks. US examination was performed on MCP joints, PIP joints, wrist and MTP joints.

Results:

Among 54 cases, 42 cases were able to continue treatment until one year later, and the continuation rate was 80.8%. Of the 12 patients who discontinued first biologics treatment, 5 were changes to other biologics due to inadequate response, 4 were their wishes, and 3 were adverse events. Multiple regression analysis was performed with treatment continuation as the dependent variable and improvement of CRP, MMP-3, DAS28-CRP, grayscale score and power Doppler score in 4 weeks as explanatory variables. Only improvement of power Doppler score was extracted as a significant predictor (p = 0.045). In the continuation group, the improvement of the power Doppler signal at week 4 was 36% compared with the baseline, compared with 10% in the discontinuation group.

Conclusion:

The early improvement of power Doppler signal in 4 weeks could be a predictive factor for the continuation of 1-year biological treatment.

References:

[1]Grassi W, Okano T, Di Geso L, Filippucci E. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: options, uses and optimization. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:1131-46.

[2]Atzeni F, Talotta R, Masala IF, Bongiovanni S, Boccassini L, Sarzi-Puttini P. Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Isr Med Assoc J. 2017;19:512-6.

Table 1.

Multivariate regression analysis of predictive factors for continuation of biologics treatment in 1-year.

Improvement ratio of 0 to 4 weeksbetaP valueCRP-0.1220.465MMP-30.2280.103DAS28 CRP0.2800.103Ultrasound grey scale score-0.3420.119Ultrasound power Doppler score0.4420.045

Acknowledgments:

We thank Emi Yamashita, Yuko Yoshida, Asami Fujii and Shingo Washida who performed ultrasound examination.

Disclosure of Interests:

Tadashi Okano Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Nipponkayaku, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahikasei, Astellas Pharma Inc, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiich Sankyo, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma and UCB, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Yutaro Yamada: None declared, Koji Mandai: None declared, Shohei Anno: None declared, Kentaro Inui Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd.,, Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tatsuya Koike Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Hiroaki Nakamura Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc. and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co.

FRI0051 RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS WITH HIGH DISEASE ACTIVITY AND TREATED WITH HIGH DOSE GLUCOCORTICOID FREQUENTLY FALL: NINE YEARS OF THE TOMORROW STUDY

Background:

Falling is a multicausal phenomenon resulting from complex interactions between intrinsic and extrinsic or environmental factors. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have muscle weakness and stiff or painful joints might be at increased risk of falling. However, little is known about the exact properties of risk factors for falling in patients with RA. Recently, the disease activity of RA has been more satisfactorily controlled by the ‘‘treat-to-target’’ strategy, including the use of biologics. Given this new era, it is important to accurately estimate the incidence of falling in patients with RA and to elucidate contributing risk factors.

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of falling and associated risk factors in 208 patients with RA and in age- and sex-matched 205 controls (Co) who participated in the TOMORROW (TOtalManagementOfRisk factors inRheumatoid arthritis patients to lOWer morbidity and mortality) study, a 10-year cohort study that started in 2010 in Japan. This research was conducted using TOMORROW study data for 9 years.

Methods:

We evaluated the incidence of falling by self-administered questionnaire every year and confirmed them by medical records. We also collected information about general health status, body composition including bone mineral density, lean body mass, fat mass and laboratory data. We compared the frequency of the incidence of falling in RA patients and Co for 9 years and analyzed risk factors for falling.

Results:

A total of 157 patients with RA (mean age: 57.1 ± 12.5 years, female: 84.7%, mean disease duration 13.9 ± 12.0 years) and 169 Co (mean age: 57.6 ± 12.5 years, female: 84.0%) completed 9 years observation. The rate of individuals who fell did not differ between two groups (RA: 66.9%, Co: 59.2%, p=0.19). However, number of falls was higher in RA than Co (0.35 vs 0.21/person-year, p=0.03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and BMI, revealed that RA was not a risk factor for the incidence of falling (OR: 1.36, 95%CI: 0.8-2.32, p=0.26) and the history of falling was a risk factor for the incidence of falling (OR: 3.27, 95%CI: 1.78-7.0, p<0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and BMI, revealed that mHAQ (β=0.17, p=0.04), mean DAS28-CRP over 9 years (β=0.19, p=0.02) and mean dosage of glucocorticoid over 9 years (β=0.18, p=0.03) were the risk factors for number of falls (table 1).

Table 1.

Multivariate linear regression analysis of risk factors associated with number of falls sustained by patients RA.

RAN=157Number of fallsβpAt the entryAnti-CCP antibody (U/mL)0.0160.835RF (IU/ml)0.0200.803History of falling0.1030.201DAS28-CRP0.0780.333mHAQ0.1690.039Dose of GC (mg/day)0.0280.7239 yearsAverage DAS28-CRP0.1850.024Average dose of GC (mg/day)0.1790.025

RA, rheumatoid arthritis; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; RF, Rheumatoid factor; DAS28-CRP, disease activity score 28 with C-reactive protein; mHAQ, modified Health Assessment Questionnaire; GC, glucocorticoid.

Conclusion:

There was no difference in the incidence of falling between RA and Co. However, number of falls was significantly higher in RA group. High disease activity and higher dosage of glucocorticoid were the risk factors for number of falls among RA patients.

References:

[1]C Armstrong et al, Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1602–1604

[2]M Hayashibara et al, Osteoporos Int 2010;21:1825–1833

Acknowledgments:

We wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama, Tomoko Nakatsuka and all participants in this study.

Disclosure of Interests:

Shohei Anno: None declared, Yuko Sugioka: None declared, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Tadashi Okano Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Nipponkayaku, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahikasei, Astellas Pharma Inc, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiich Sankyo, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma and UCB, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Kentaro Inui Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd.,, Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tatsuya Koike Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Hiroaki Nakamura Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc. and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co.

FRI0609-HPR NUTRIENTS INTAKE CONDITION RELATES TO MAINTENANCE LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS DURING 6 YEARS: TOMORROW STUDY

Background:

We have previously reported that nutritional intake status might relate to disease activity (1). Nutritional survey on prospective cohort study in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and information about relationship between nutritional intake status and disease activity was very limited.

Objectives:

This study aimed to obtain data from a cohort study for new nutritional therapy in RA patients.

Methods:

We used TOMORROW cohort study data which conducted from years of 2010 to 2020. Two hundred and eight RA patients, and 205 non-RA sex and age matched controls were investigated, and we analyzed data from 2011 to 2017. Nutritional intake status was compared between who maintain lower disease activity during 2011 to 2017 (LDA group) and being higher disease activity even once in 2011 to 2017 (non-LDA group). Disease activity was evaluated by DAS28-ESR in every year and nutritional intake status was surveyed by brief self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ) in 2011 and 2017.

Results:

In RA patients, the change value from 2011 to 2017 of iron (odds ratio; 2.37), thiamin (OR; 2.96) and folic acid (OR; 3.16) intake which adjusted by energy intake, age, rheumatoid factor and medication status were extracted as independent factors for maintain LDA by multivariate logistic regression. These nutrients intake in RA patients was significantly lower than control both in 2011 and 2017. In RA patients, iron and folic acid intake in LDA group was significantly lower than non-LDA group in 2011. Folic acid intake was increased in LDA group and decreased in non-LDA group over time, and these nutrients showed significant differences in change value between LDA group and non-LDA group (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

The overtime change value in iron, thiamin and folic acid related to maintain six years low disease activity in RA patients.

References:

[1] Matsumoto Y, Sugioka Y, Tada M, Okano T, Mamoto K, Inui K, et al. Monounsaturated fatty acids might be key factors in the Mediterranean diet that suppress rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: The TOMORROW study. Clinical Nutrition 37:675-680, 2018

Disclosure of Interests:

Yoshinari Matsumoto Grant/research support from: Yamada Research Grant (grant No.249), Yuko Sugioka: None declared, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Tadashi Okano Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Nipponkayaku, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahikasei, Astellas Pharma Inc, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiich Sankyo, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma and UCB, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Kentaro Inui Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd.,, Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiki Habu: None declared, Tatsuya Koike Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB

THU0138 AGEING IN RA PATIENTS DETERIORATED MODIFIED HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (MHAQ) OVER A 7-YEAR PERIOD INDEPENDENTLY FROM DISEASE ACTIVITY

Background:

Recent advances of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) realizes us to set the treatment goal as remission. As the results, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) has been also becoming better in these years. On the other hand, progress in ageing has been a major issue in Japan, including the patients with RA. which is thought as one of the factors affecting HAQ.

Objectives:

To evaluate the impact of ageing on HAQ in RA patients.

Methods:

The data of 208 RA patients used in this study was collected over a 7-year period from 2010 to 2017 as part of a prospective cohort study (TOMORROW Study: UMIN000003876) that included RA patients and age- and sex-matched volunteers recruited through mass media as controls. The data of RA patients included anthropometric, blood test data, disease activity score28-CRP (DAS28) and modified HAQ (mHAQ), together with baseline (BL) characteristics. The course of mHAQ for 7 years were analyzed by repeated measure ANOVA, and association between the changes of mHAQ at year-7 from BL (ΔmHAQ) and BL factors were analyzed by multiple regression analysis.

Results:

Two hundred and eight RA patients (153 women; mean age 58.1 years) were enrolled in the present study. Modified HAQ decreased significantly over the 7-year study period in RA patients. When the patients were stratified into 3 groups (lower than 2.7, between 2.7 and 4.1, over 4.1) by DAS28 at BL, mHAQ of the patients with high disease activity (DAS28: over 4.1) at BL was significantly worse than other groups (p=0.018; repeated measure ANOVA). There was no interaction between time and 3 groups (p=0.118; repeated measure ANOVA). Multiple regression analysis with ΔmHAQ as the outcome variable and ACPA, age, BMI, CRP, DAS28, MMP-3 at BL as independent variables revealed that age (p=0.034) and DAS28 (p=0.042) were independently related with ΔmHAQ.

Conclusion:

Ageing in RA patients impacted worsening of mHAQ over a 7-year period independently from disease activity. On assessing mHAQ in elderly RA patients, we must consider the age as well as the disease activity.

Disclosure of Interests:

Kentaro Inui Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd.,, Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Yuko Sugioka: None declared, Tadashi Okano Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Nipponkayaku, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahikasei, Astellas Pharma Inc, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiich Sankyo, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma and UCB, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, kazuki Orita: None declared, Hiroaki Nakamura Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc. and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co.

AB0235 DENOSUMAB INCREASE THE BONE MINERAL DENSITY REGARDLESS OF DISEASE ACTIVITY, THE BIOLOGICAL DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS, THE CONCOMITANT TYPE OF VITAMIN D, AND PRETREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Osteoporosis is one of the major comorbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are a lot of evidence that denosumab increase bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with osteoporosis. However, there are few reports investigated the influence of denosumab in patients with RA.

Objectives:

We evaluated the BMD change in patients with RA treated denosumab and assessed the effect of various factors, such as disease activity, biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) use, concomitant medications of osteoporosis and pretreatment of osteoporosis.

Methods:

This study included 140 consecutive RA patients (135 female, mean age was 70.6 ± 8.6 years) who fullfilled the criteria of osteoporosis and treated with denosumab. BMD at the lumbar spine, proximal femoral and femoral neck were evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and one year after treatment. We evaluated the influence of disease activity, bDMARDs use, the concomitant type of vitamin D and pretreatment of osteoporosis for BMD change.

Results:

BMD change at the lumbar spine, proximal femoral and femoral neck were 5.9% (p<0.01), 4.0% (p<0.01), and 1.2% (p=0.36) durling one year. There were no differences in improvement ratio of BMD between each parameters (fig 1). Disease activity: 75 patients in remission or low disease activity and 65 patients in moderate or high disease activity were 6.4 vs 5.3% (p=0.91), 3.0 vs 5.1% (p=0.73), 2.0 vs 0.3% (p=0.1). bDMARDs: 45 patients with bDMARDs (anti-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF): 23, tocilizmab (TCZ): 13, abatacept (ABT): 7, Tofacitinib: 2) and 93 patients without bDMARDs were 6.0 vs 5.8% (p=0.31), 4.3 vs 4.1% (p=0.57), -0.2 vs 1.8% (p=0.18). Type of vitamin D: 47 patients taking active form vitamin D and 60 patients taking native form vitamin D were 5.5 vs 6.8% (p=0.82), 3.1 vs 3.8% (p=0.93), 0.4 vs 1.9% (p=0.14). Pretreatment of osteoporosis: 74 patients with pretreatment of osteoporosis (bisphosphonate:58, teriparatide:16) and 66 patients without pretreatment of osteoporosis were 6.9 vs 5.4% (p=0.41), 0.9 vs 4.0% (p=0.22), 2.0 vs 1.2% (p=0.68). Moreover, BMD change were not different in bDMARDs type, 5.0, 6.4, 0.5% in TNF group, 4.8, 0.7, -1.9% in TCZ group, 9.7, 4.9, 0.2% in ABT group (TNF vs TCZ: p=0.83, 0.98, 0.81, TNF vs ABT: p=0.83, 0.41, 0.97, TCZ vs ABT: p=0.98, 0.43, 0.9). There were no difference between bisphosphonate and teriparatide (6.2 vs 6.9%: p=0.49, 4.8 vs 0.9%: p=0.35, 0.9 vs 2.0%: p=0.49).

Conclusion:

Denosumab improved BMD in patients with RA independently regardless of disease activity, bDMARDs, the concomitant type of vitamin D and pretreatment of osteoporosis.

References:

[1]Y Nakamura et al, Arch Osteoporos: 2017; 12:80.

[2]K Kaneko et al, Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics: 2019; 6:41.

[3]T Suzuki et al, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management: 2018; 14:453–459.

Acknowledgments:

We wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama, Tomoko Nakatsuka, Masato Uematsu and all participants in this study.

Disclosure of Interests:

Shohei Anno: None declared, Tadashi Okano Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Nipponkayaku, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahikasei, Astellas Pharma Inc, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiich Sankyo, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma and UCB, Kentaro Inui Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd.,, Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tatsuya Koike Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Astellas Pharma Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Hiroaki Nakamura Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc. and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co.

Denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in a patient with bone metastases of prostate cancer: A case report and literature review

Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κβ ligand (RANKL), is used for the treatment of patients with metastatic cancer of the bone or osteoporosis. Recent reports have demonstrated that denosumab can induce osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), but reported cases of this are uncommon. The present study reports the case of an 86-year-old male with prostate cancer patient exhibiting bone metastases who developed ONJ whilst receiving denosumab. To elucidate the influence of denosumab on the development of ONJ, the present study also reviewed the literature, including clinical trials and case reports. In the clinical trials, the prevalence of denosumab-related ONJ was higher in patients with cancer compared with those with osteoporosis. The high risk of ONJ in patients with cancer was thought to be associated with the differing dose and frequency of denosumab administration. The prevalence of ONJ was not significantly different between patients receiving denosumab and bisphoshonate (BP). In the reported cases, denosumab-related ONJ had a similar clinical presentation to BP-related ONJ. There was also a tendency for denosumab-related ONJ to develop in the mandible of elderly patients. Previous invasive dental treatment was a commonly shared characteristic of patients with denosumab-related ONJ. A complex medical history was also suspected to affect the prevalence. No clear association between the dose or duration of denosumab treatment and the development of ONJ was observed. Although conservative treatments are given for denosumab-related ONJ, non-improving cases were managed surgically with primarily positive results. Because denosumab may offer superior results compared with BP for the treatment of metastatic cancer of the bone or osteoporosis, the use of denosumab is expected to increase in the near future. Clinicians should also be aware of the risk factors for denosumab-related ONJ, in order to aid in its diagnosis. In addition, patients treated with denosumab should receive prophylactic treatment to maintain their oral health prior to, during and after denosumab treatment.

Reducing glucocorticoid dosage improves serum osteocalcin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-results from the TOMORROW study

Decreasing the daily dose of glucocorticoids improved bone metabolic marker levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, changes in disease activity did not influence bone metabolism. Bone metabolism might thus remain uncontrolled even if disease activity is under good control. Decreasing glucocorticoid dosage appears important for improving bone metabolism.

INTRODUCTION

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) develop osteoporosis more frequently than healthy individuals. Bone resorption is increased and bone formation is inhibited in patients with RA, and glucocorticoid negatively affects bone metabolism. We aimed to investigate factors influencing bone metabolic markers in patients with RA.

METHODS

We started the 10-year prospective cohort Total Management of Risk Factors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients to Lower Morbidity and Mortality (TOMORROW) study in 2010. We compared changes in urinary cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTx) and serum osteocalcin (OC), as markers of bone resorption and formation, respectively, in 202 RA patients and age- and sex-matched volunteers between 2010 and 2011. We also investigated factors influencing ΔuNTx and ΔOC in the RA group using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Values of ΔuNTx were significantly lower in patients with RA than in healthy controls (-0.51 vs. 7.41 nmol bone collagen equivalents (BCE)/mmol creatinine (Cr); p = 0.0013), whereas ΔOC values were significantly higher in RA patients (0.94 vs. 0.37 ng/ml; p = 0.0065). Changes in prednisolone dosage correlated negatively with ΔOC (β = -0.229, p = 0.001), whereas changes in disease activity score, bisphosphonate therapy, and period of biologics therapy did not correlate significantly with ΔOC. No significant correlation was seen between ΔuNTx and change in prednisolone dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased glucocorticoid dosage improved bone metabolic markers in RA, but disease activity, bisphosphonate therapy, and period of biologics therapy did not influence levels of bone metabolic markers. Decreasing glucocorticoid dosage appears important for improving bone metabolic marker profiles in patients with RA.