Point-of-care glycated hemoglobin a1c testing for the identification of hyperglycemia severity among individuals with dual tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus in Tanzania

Background

Poor glycemic control during tuberculosis (TB) treatment is challenging, as the optimum treatment strategy remains unclear. We assessed hyperglycemia severity using glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) test and predictors of severe hyperglycemia at the time of TB diagnosis in three resources-diverse regions in Tanzania.

Methods

This was a substudy from a large cohort study implemented in three regions of Tanzania. TB individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) (prior history of DM or newly diagnosed DM) were assessed for hyperglycemic levels using HbA1c test and stratified as mild (<53 mmol/mol), moderate (≥53-<86 mmol/mol), and severe (≥86 mmo/mol).

Results

From October 2019 to September 2020, 1344 confirmed TB individuals were screened for DM and 105 (7.8%) individuals had dual TB/DM and were assessed for glycemic levels. Of these, 69 (67.7%) had a prior history of DM and 26 (24.8%) were living with human immunodeficiency virus. Their mean age was 49.0 (±15.0) years and 56.2% were male. The majority (77.1%) had pulmonary TB, and 96.2% were newly diagnosed TB individuals. HbA1c test identified 41(39.0%), 37 (35.2%), and 27 (25.7%) individuals with severe, moderate, and mild the hyperglycaemia respectively. Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 3.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-11.92, P = 0.040) and previous history of DM (OR: 3.71, 95% CI: 1.33-10.33, P = 0.013) were independent risk factors for severe hyperglycemic at the time of TB diagnosis.

Conclusion

By integrating early HbA1c testing, a substantial proportion of individuals with severe hyperglycemia were identified. HbA1c testing can be recommended to identify and triage patients requiring personalized intensified DM management in resource-limited programmatic settings.

Implementing Innovative Approaches to Improve Health Care Delivery Systems for Integrating Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases Using Tuberculosis and Diabetes as a Model in Tanzania

Background: Many evidence-based health interventions, particularly in low-income settings, have failed to deliver the expected impact. We designed an Adaptive Diseases Control Expert Programme in Tanzania (ADEPT) to address systemic challenges in health care delivery and examined the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of the model using tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) as a prototype. Methods: This was an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-3 design that was implemented in Dar es Salaam, Iringa and Kilimanjaro regions. The strategy included a stepwise training approach with web-based platforms adapting the Gibbs' reflective cycle. Health facilities with TB services were supplemented with DM diagnostics, including glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). The clinical audit was deployed as a measure of fidelity. Retrospective and cross-sectional designs were used to assess the fidelity, acceptability and feasibility of the model. Results: From 2019-2021, the clinical audit showed that ADEPT intervention health facilities more often identified median 8 (IQR 6-19) individuals with dual TB and DM, compared with control health facilities, median of 1 (IQR 0-3) (p = 0.02). Likewise, the clinical utility of HbA1c on intervention sites was 63% (IQR:35-75%) in TB/DM individuals compared to none in the control sites at all levels, whereas other components of the standard of clinical management of patients with dual TB and DM did not significantly differ. The health facilities showed no difference in screening for additional comorbidities such as hypertension and malnutrition. The stepwise training enrolled a total of 46 nurse officers and medical doctors/specialists for web-based training and 40 (87%) attended the workshop. Thirty-one (67%), 18 nurse officers and 13 medical doctors/specialists, implemented the second step of training others and yielded a total of 519 additional front-line health care workers trained: 371 nurses and 148 clinicians. Overall, the ADEPT model was scored as feasible by metrics applied to both front-line health care providers and health facilities. Conclusions: It was feasible to use a stepwise training and clinical audit to support the integration of TB and DM management and it was largely acceptable and effective in differing regions within Tanzania. When adapted in the Tanzania health system context, the model will likely improve quality of services.

Experiences and perceptions of participants on the pathway towards clinical management of dual tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus in Tanzania

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity among people with tuberculosis (TB). Despite the availability of guidelines on how to integrate dual TB/DM in Tanzania, the practice of integration at various healthcare levels is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the participants' experiences and perceptions on the pathway towards clinical management of dual TB/DM.

METHOD

The research was carried out in Dar es Salaam, Iringa, and Kilimanjaro regions between January and February 2020. A qualitative, in-depth interview approach was used to collect participants' experiences and perspectives on the acquisition of dual TB/DM services at various levels of healthcare facilities. The information gathered were coded and classified thematically.

RESULTS

The participants' perception of TB services within the healthcare facilities was positive due to the support they received from the healthcare providers. On the other hand, participants reported difficulty receiving management in various health facilities for each condition in terms of access to dual TB/DM care and access to DM medication. This was viewed as a significant challenge for the participants with dual TB/DM.

CONCLUSIONS

The current disjunction and disruption in healthcare for people with dual TB/DM makes it difficult to access services at various levels of health facilities. For optimal clinical management for people with dual TB/DM, patient-centered strategies and integrated approaches are urgently needed.

Where can Tanzania health system integrate clinical management of patients with dual tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus? A cross-sectional survey at varying levels of health facilities

Objective

Study design

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-infective Drugs: Implementation Strategies for 3 Different Scenarios

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) supports personalized treatment. For successful implementation, TDM must have a turnaround time suited to the clinical needs of patients and their health care settings. Here, the authors share their views of how a TDM strategy can be tailored to specific settings and patient groups.

METHODS

The authors selected distinct scenarios for TDM: high-risk, complex, and/or critically ill patient population; outpatients; and settings with limited laboratory resources. In addition to the TDM scenario approach, they explored potential issues with the legal framework governing dose escalation.

RESULTS

The most important issues identified in the different scenarios are that critically ill patients require rapid turnaround time, outpatients require an easy sampling procedure for the sample matrix and sample collection times, settings with limited laboratory resources necessitate setting-specific analytic techniques, and all scenarios warrant a legal framework to capture the use of escalated dosages, ideally with the use of trackable dosing software.

CONCLUSIONS

To benefit patients, TDM strategies need to be tailored to the intended population. Strategies can be adapted for rapid turnaround time for critically ill patients, convenient sampling for outpatients, and feasibility for those in settings with limited laboratory resources.