1
|
Khachfe HH, Hammad AY, AlMasri S, Nassour I, ElAsmar R, Liu H, de Silva A, Kraftician J, Lee KK, Zureikat AH, Paniccia A. Postoperative infectious complications worsen oncologic outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1097-1105. [PMID: 38316936 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains the only curative option for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Infectious complications (IC) can negatively impact patient outcomes and delay adjuvant therapy in most patients. This study aims to determine IC effect on overall survival (OS) following PD for PDAC. STUDY DESIGN Patients who underwent PD for PDAC between 2010 and 2020 were identified from a single institutional database. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they experienced IC or not. The relationship between postoperative IC and OS was investigated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression multivariate analysis. RESULTS Among 655 patients who underwent PD for PDAC, 197 (30%) experienced a postoperative IC. Superficial wound infection was the most common type of infectious complication (n = 125, 63.4%). Patients with IC had significantly more minor complications (Clavien-Dindo [CD] < 3; [59.4% vs. 40.2%, p < 0.001]), major complications (CD ≥ 3; [37.6% vs. 18.8%, p < 0.001]), prolonged LOS (47.2% vs 20.3%, p < 0.001), biochemical leak (6.1% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.046), postoperative bleeding (4.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.026) and reoperation (9.6% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001). Time to adjuvant chemotherapy was delayed in patients with IC versus those without (10 vs. 8 weeks, p < 0.001). Median OS for patients who experienced no complication, noninfectious complication, and infectious complication was 33.3 months, 29.06 months, and 27.58 months respectively (p = 0.023). On multivariate analysis, postoperative IC were an independent predictor of worse OS (HR 1.32, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS IC following PD for PDAC independently predict worse oncologic outcomes. Thus, efforts to prevent and manage IC should be a priority in the care of patients undergoing PD for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hussein H Khachfe
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abdulrahman Y Hammad
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rudy ElAsmar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Annissa de Silva
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jasmine Kraftician
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Etherington MS, Handzel R, Ongchin M, Choudry MH, Tohme ST, Paniccia A, Lee KK, Zureikat A, Geller DA. Remnant completion cholecystectomy is on the rise: Don't three-putt it. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)01273-5. [PMID: 38735816 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S Etherington
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert Handzel
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon Choudry
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Samer T Tohme
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Murthy P, Zenati MS, AlMasri SS, DeSilva A, Singhi AD, Paniccia A, Lee KK, Simmons RL, Bahary N, Lotze MT, Zureikat AH. Impact of Recombinant Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor During Neoadjuvant Therapy on Outcomes of Resected Pancreatic Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 22:e237070. [PMID: 38150819 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease characterized by chronic inflammation and a tolerogenic immune response. The granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-neutrophil axis promotes oncogenesis and progression of PDAC. Despite frequent use of recombinant G-CSF in the management and prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, its impact on oncologic outcomes of patients with resected PDAC is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS This cohort study assessing the impact of G-CSF administration was conducted on 351 patients with PDAC treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and pancreatic resection at a high-volume tertiary care academic center from 2014 to 2019. Participants were identified from a prospectively maintained database and had a median follow-up of 45.8 months. RESULTS Patients receiving G-CSF (n=138; 39.3%) were younger (64.0 vs 66.7 years; P=.008), had lower body mass index (26.5 vs 27.9; P=.021), and were more likely to receive 5-FU-based chemotherapy (42.0% vs 28.2%; P<.0001). No differences were observed in baseline or clinical tumor staging. Patients receiving G-CSF were more likely to have an elevated (>5.53) post-NAT neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (45.0% vs 29.6%; P=.004). G-CSF recipients also demonstrated higher circulating levels of neutrophil extracellular traps (+709 vs -619 pg/mL; P=.006). On multivariate analysis, G-CSF treatment was associated with perineural invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 2.65; 95% CI, 1.16-6.03; P=.021) and margin-positive resection (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.77; P=.046). Patients receiving G-CSF had decreased overall survival (OS) compared with nonrecipients (median OS, 29.2 vs 38.7 months; P=.001). G-CSF administration was a negative independent predictor of OS (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.45-2.79; P<.0001). In the inverse probability weighted analysis of 301 matched patients, neoadjuvant G-CSF administration was associated with reduced OS. CONCLUSIONS In patients with localized PDAC receiving NAT prior to surgical extirpation, G-CSF administration may be associated with worse oncologic outcomes and should be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranav Murthy
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samer S AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Annissa DeSilva
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard L Simmons
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathan Bahary
- AHN Cancer Center, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael T Lotze
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ahmad SB, Hodges JC, Nassour I, Casciani F, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Vollmer CM, Zureikat AH. The risk of clinically-relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy is better predicted by a postoperative trend in drain fluid amylase compared to day 1 values in isolation. Surgery 2023; 174:916-923. [PMID: 37468367 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies support early drain removal after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with a drain fluid amylase on postoperative day 1 (DFA1) level of ≤5,000. The use of DFA1 to guide drain management is increasingly common among pancreatic surgeons; however, the benefit of checking additional drain fluid amylases beyond DFA1 is less known. We sought to determine whether a change in drain fluid amylase (ΔDFA) is a more reliable predictor of clinically relevant postoperative fistula than DFA1 alone. METHODS Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Plan, pancreaticoduodenectomy patients with intraoperative drain placement, known DFA1, highest recorded drain fluid amylase value on postoperative day 2 to 5 (DFA2nd), day of drain removal, and clinically relevant postoperative fistula status were reviewed. Logistic models compared the predictive performance of DFA1 alone versus DFA1 + ΔDFA. RESULTS A total of 2,417 patients with an overall clinically relevant postoperative fistula rate of 12.6% were analyzed. On multivariable regression, clinical predictors for clinically relevant postoperative fistula included body mass index, steroid use, operative time, and gland texture. These variables were used to develop model 1 (DFA1 alone) and model 2 (DFA1 + ΔDFA). Model 2 outperformed model 1 in predicting the risk of clinically relevant postoperative fistula. According to model 2 predictions, the risk of clinically relevant postoperative fistula increased with any rise in drain fluid amylase, regardless of whether the DFA1 was above or below 5,000 U/L. The risk of clinically relevant postoperative fistula significantly decreased with any drop in drain fluid amylase, with an odds reduction of approximately 50% corresponding with a 70% decrease in drain fluid amylase (P < .001). A risk calculator was developed using DFA1 and a secondary DFA value in conjunction with other clinical predictors for clinically relevant postoperative fistula. CONCLUSION Clinically relevant postoperative fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy is more accurately predicted by DFA1 and ΔDFA versus DFA1 in isolation. We developed a novel risk calculator to provide an individualized approach to drain management after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarwat B Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA
| | - Jacob C Hodges
- Wolff Center at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA
| | - Fabio Casciani
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Italy; Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA
| | | | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nikiforova MN, Wald AI, Spagnolo DM, Melan MA, Grupillo M, Lai YT, Brand RE, O’Broin-Lennon AM, McGrath K, Park WG, Pfau PR, Polanco PM, Kubiliun N, DeWitt J, Easler JJ, Dam A, Mok SR, Wallace MB, Kumbhari V, Boone BA, Marsh W, Thakkar S, Fairley KJ, Afghani E, Bhat Y, Ramrakhiani S, Nasr J, Skef W, Thiruvengadam NR, Khalid A, Fasanella K, Chennat J, Das R, Singh H, Sarkaria S, Slivka A, Gabbert C, Sawas T, Tielleman T, Vanderveldt HD, Tavakkoli A, Smith LM, Smith K, Bell PD, Hruban RH, Paniccia A, Zureikat A, Lee KK, Ongchin M, Zeh H, Minter R, He J, Nikiforov YE, Singhi AD. A Combined DNA/RNA-based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform to Improve the Classification of Pancreatic Cysts and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer Arising From Pancreatic Cysts. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e789-e797. [PMID: 37212422 PMCID: PMC10481930 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We report the development and validation of a combined DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform to improve the evaluation of pancreatic cysts. BACKGROUND AND AIMS Despite a multidisciplinary approach, pancreatic cyst classification, such as a cystic precursor neoplasm, and the detection of high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma (advanced neoplasia) can be challenging. NGS of preoperative pancreatic cyst fluid improves the clinical evaluation of pancreatic cysts, but the recent identification of novel genomic alterations necessitates the creation of a comprehensive panel and the development of a genomic classifier to integrate the complex molecular results. METHODS An updated and unique 74-gene DNA/RNA-targeted NGS panel (PancreaSeq Genomic Classifier) was created to evaluate 5 classes of genomic alterations to include gene mutations (e.g., KRAS, GNAS, etc.), gene fusions and gene expression. Further, CEA mRNA ( CEACAM5 ) was integrated into the assay using RT-qPCR. Separate multi-institutional cohorts for training (n=108) and validation (n=77) were tested, and diagnostic performance was compared to clinical, imaging, cytopathologic, and guideline data. RESULTS Upon creation of a genomic classifier system, PancreaSeq GC yielded a 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for a cystic precursor neoplasm, and the sensitivity and specificity for advanced neoplasia were 82% and 100%, respectively. Associated symptoms, cyst size, duct dilatation, a mural nodule, increasing cyst size, and malignant cytopathology had lower sensitivities (41-59%) and lower specificities (56-96%) for advanced neoplasia. This test also increased the sensitivity of current pancreatic cyst guidelines (IAP/Fukuoka and AGA) by >10% and maintained their inherent specificity. CONCLUSIONS PancreaSeq GC was not only accurate in predicting pancreatic cyst type and advanced neoplasia but also improved the sensitivity of current pancreatic cyst guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina N. Nikiforova
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Abigail I. Wald
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Daniel M. Spagnolo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Melissa A. Melan
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Maria Grupillo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Yi-Tak Lai
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Randall E. Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Anne Marie O’Broin-Lennon
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kevin McGrath
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Walter G. Park
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Patrick R. Pfau
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Patricio M. Polanco
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Nisa Kubiliun
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - John DeWitt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Health Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Jeffrey J. Easler
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Health Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Aamir Dam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Shaffer R. Mok
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Michael B. Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
- Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Brian A. Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV
| | - Wallis Marsh
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV
| | - Shyam Thakkar
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV
| | - Kimberly J. Fairley
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV
| | - Elham Afghani
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yasser Bhat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), Mountain View, CA
| | - Sanjay Ramrakhiani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), Mountain View, CA
| | - John Nasr
- Department of Medicine, Wheeling Hospital, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV
| | - Wasseem Skef
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Nikhil R. Thiruvengadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Asif Khalid
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kenneth Fasanella
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jennifer Chennat
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Rohit Das
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Harkirat Singh
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Savreet Sarkaria
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Adam Slivka
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Charles Gabbert
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Tarek Sawas
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Thomas Tielleman
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Anna Tavakkoli
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Lynette M. Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Katelyn Smith
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Phoenix D. Bell
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kenneth K. Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Herbert Zeh
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Rebecca Minter
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Jin He
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yuri E. Nikiforov
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khachfe HH, Nassour I, Hammad AY, Hodges JC, AlMasri S, Liu H, deSilva A, Kraftician J, Lee KK, Pitt HA, Zureikat AH, Paniccia A. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Increased Adoption and Improved Outcomes: Is Laparoscopy Still Justified? Ann Surg 2023; 278:e563-e569. [PMID: 36000753 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the rate of postoperative 30-day complications between laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). BACKGROUND Previous studies suggest that minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MI-PD)-either LPD or RPD-is noninferior to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in terms of operative outcomes. However, a direct comparison of the two minimally invasive approaches has not been rigorously performed. METHODS Patients who underwent MI-PD were abstracted from the 2014 to 2019 pancreas-targeted American College of Surgeons National Sample Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) dataset. Optimal outcome was defined as absence of postoperative mortality, serious complication, percutaneous drainage, reoperation, and prolonged length of stay (75th percentile, 11 days) with no readmission. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare optimal outcome of RPD and LPD. RESULTS A total of 1540 MI-PDs were identified between 2014 and 2019, of which 885 (57%) were RPD and 655 (43%) were LPD. The rate of RPD cases/year significantly increased from 2.4% to 8.4% ( P =0.008) from 2014 to 2019, while LPD remained unchanged. Similarly, the rate of optimal outcome for RPD increased during the study period from 48.2% to 57.8% ( P <0.001) but significantly decreased for LPD (53.5% to 44.9%, P <0.001). During 2018-2019, RPD outcomes surpassed LPD for any complication [odds ratio (OR)=0.58, P =0.004], serious complications (OR=0.61, P =0.011), and optimal outcome (OR=1.78, P =0.001). CONCLUSIONS RPD adoption increased compared with LPD and was associated with decreased overall complications, serious complications, and increased optimal outcome compared with LPD in 2018-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hussein H Khachfe
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Abdulrahman Y Hammad
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jacob C Hodges
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Samer AlMasri
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Hao Liu
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Anissa deSilva
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jasmine Kraftician
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Althans AR, Byrd T, Suppok R, Lee KK, Rosengart MR, Myers SP. Impact of holistic review on diversity of interviewed and matriculating residents in graduate medical education: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074118. [PMID: 37438073 PMCID: PMC10347482 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diversity in the physician workforce improves patient-centred outcomes. Patients are more likely to trust in and comply with care when seeing gender/racially concordant providers. A current emphasis on standardised metrics in academic achievement often serves as a barrier to the recruitment and retention of gender and racial minorities in medicine. Holistic review of residency applicants has been supported as a means of encouraging diversification but is not yet standardised. The current body of evidence examining the effects of holistic review on the recruitment of racial and gender minorities in surgical residencies is small. We therefore propose a systematic review to summarise the state of holistic review in graduate medical education in the USA and its impact on diversification. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Our systematic review protocol has been designed with plans to report our review findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. PubMed and Embase will be searched with the assistance of a health sciences librarian with expertise in systematic review. We will include studies of graduate medical education programmes that describe the implementation of holistic review, outline the components of their holistic review process and compare proportions of under-represented minorities (URM) and women interviewed and matriculating before and after holistic review implementation. We will first report a summary of the findings regarding the operationalisation of holistic review as described by studies included. We will then pool the percentages of URM and women for interviewee and matriculant populations from each study and report the collective odds ratios of each for holistic review compared with traditional review as our primary outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is a protocol for systematic review, and therefore does not involve any human subjects. Findings will be published in the form of a manuscript submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023401389.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison R Althans
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tamara Byrd
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel Suppok
- Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew R Rosengart
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sara P Myers
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hanks MM, Schnorenberg AJ, Lee KK, Slavens BA. Three-Dimensional Biomechanics of the Trunk and Upper Extremity During Overhead Throwing in Wheelchair Lacrosse Athletes With Spinal Cord Injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 102:365-371. [PMID: 35152250 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000001989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quantify differences in overhead throwing kinematics between wheelchair lacrosse athletes with spinal cord injury and able-bodied lacrosse athletes. DESIGN This is a cross-sectional, prospective study. Motion analysis captured overhead throwing motions of five wheelchair lacrosse athletes with spinal cord injury and six able-bodied lacrosse athletes seated in a wheelchair and standing. Three-dimensional thorax and dominant arm sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, glenohumeral, elbow, and wrist joint angles, ranges of motion, as well as angular velocities were computed using an inverse kinematics model. Nonparametric tests assessed group differences ( P < 0.05). RESULTS Participants with spinal cord injury exhibited less peak thorax axial rotation, ranges of motion, and angular velocity, as well as greater wrist flexion than able-bodied participants seated. Participants with spinal cord injury exhibited less peak thorax axial rotation and lateral bending, ranges of motion, and three-dimensional angular velocities; less peak two-dimensional sternoclavicular joint motion, ranges of motion, and peak angular velocities; less peak acromioclavicular joint protraction angular velocity; less glenohumeral joint adduction-abduction and internal-external rotation motion, ranges of motion, and angular velocities; and greater wrist flexion than able-bodied participants standing. CONCLUSIONS Kinematic differences were observed between groups, with athletes with spinal cord injury exhibiting less thorax and upper extremity joint motion and slower joint angular velocities than able-bodied athletes. This knowledge may provide insights for movement patterns and potential injury risk in wheelchair lacrosse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Hanks
- From the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences & Technology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (MMH, AJS, BAS); Spinal Cord Injury Center, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (KKL, BAS); and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (KKL)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hammad AY, Hodges JC, AlMasri S, Paniccia A, Lee KK, Bahary N, Singhi AD, Ellsworth SG, Aldakkak M, Evans DB, Tsai S, Zureikat A. Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Surgically Resected Pancreatic Carcinoma With Node-Negative Disease After Neoadjuvant Therapy. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:55-62. [PMID: 36416848 PMCID: PMC9685551 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is rarely associated with a complete histopathologic response in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but results in downstaging of regional nodal disease. Such nodal downstaging after NAT may have implications for the use of additional adjuvant therapy (AT). Objectives To examine the prognostic implications of AT in patients with node-negative (N0) disease after NAT and to identify factors associated with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective review was conducted using data from 2 high-volume, tertiary care academic centers (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and the Medical College of Wisconsin). Prospectively maintained pancreatic cancer databases at both institutes were searched to identify patients with localized PDAC treated with preoperative therapy and subsequent surgical resection between 2010 and 2019, with N0 disease on final histopathology. Exposures Patients received NAT consisting of chemotherapy with or without concomitant neoadjuvant radiation (NART). For patients who received NART, chemotherapy regimens were gemcitabine or 5-fluoururacil based and included stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) after all intended chemotherapy and approximately 4 to 5 weeks before anticipated surgery. Adjuvant therapy consisted of gemcitabine-based therapy or FOLFIRINOX; when used, adjuvant radiation was commonly administered as either SBRT or IMRT. Main Outcomes and Measures The association of AT with PFS and OS was evaluated in the overall cohort and in different subgroups. The interaction between AT and other clinicopathologic variables was examined on Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results In this cohort study, 430 consecutive patients were treated between 2010 and 2019. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 65.2 (9.4) years, and 220 (51.2%) were women. The predominant NAT was gemcitabine based (196 patients [45.6%]), with a median duration of 2.7 cycles (IQR, 1.5-3.4). Neoadjuvant radiation was administered to 279 patients (64.9%). Pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 310 patients (72.1%), and 160 (37.2%) required concomitant vascular resection. The median lymph node yield was 26 (IQR, 19-34); perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and residual positive margins (R1) were found in 254 (59.3%), 92 (22.0%), and 87 (21.1%) patients, respectively. The restricted mean OS was 5.2 years (95% CI, 4.8-5.7). On adjusted analysis, PNI, LVI, and poorly differentiated tumors were independently associated with worse PFS and OS in N0 disease after NAT, with hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 2.04 (1.43-2.92; P < .001) and 1.68 (1.14-2.48; P = .009), 1.47 (1.08-1.98; P = .01) and 1.54 (1.10-2.14; P = .01), and 1.90 (1.18-3.07; P = .008) and 1.98 (1.20-3.26; P = .008), respectively. Although AT was associated with prolonged survival in the overall cohort, the effect was reduced in patients who received NART and strengthened in patients with PNI (AT × PNI interaction: hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32-0.97]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest a survival benefit for AT in patients with N0 disease after NAT and surgical resection. This survival benefit may be most pronounced in patients with PNI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulrahman Y Hammad
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jacob C Hodges
- Wolff Center at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samer AlMasri
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathan Bahary
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mohammed Aldakkak
- LaBahn Pancreatic Cancer Program, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Douglas B Evans
- LaBahn Pancreatic Cancer Program, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Susan Tsai
- LaBahn Pancreatic Cancer Program, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Adam MA, Glencer A, AlMasri S, Winters S, Bahary N, Singhi A, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH. ASO Visual Abstract: Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Upfront Resection for Non-pancreatic Periampullary Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:177-178. [PMID: 36316507 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12648-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Alexa Glencer
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Samer AlMasri
- UPMC Network Cancer Registry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sharon Winters
- UPMC Network Cancer Registry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paniccia A, Polanco PM, Boone BA, Wald AI, McGrath K, Brand RE, Khalid A, Kubiliun N, O'Broin-Lennon AM, Park WG, Klapman J, Tharian B, Inamdar S, Fasanella K, Nasr J, Chennat J, Das R, DeWitt J, Easler JJ, Bick B, Singh H, Fairley KJ, Sarkaria S, Sawas T, Skef W, Slivka A, Tavakkoli A, Thakkar S, Kim V, Vanderveldt HD, Richardson A, Wallace MB, Brahmbhatt B, Engels M, Gabbert C, Dugum M, El-Dika S, Bhat Y, Ramrakhiani S, Bakis G, Rolshud D, Millspaugh G, Tielleman T, Schmidt C, Mansour J, Marsh W, Ongchin M, Centeno B, Monaco SE, Ohori NP, Lajara S, Thompson ED, Hruban RH, Bell PD, Smith K, Permuth JB, Vandenbussche C, Ernst W, Grupillo M, Kaya C, Hogg M, He J, Wolfgang CL, Lee KK, Zeh H, Zureikat A, Nikiforova MN, Singhi AD. Prospective, Multi-Institutional, Real-Time Next-Generation Sequencing of Pancreatic Cyst Fluid Reveals Diverse Genomic Alterations That Improve the Clinical Management of Pancreatic Cysts. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:117-133.e7. [PMID: 36209796 PMCID: PMC9844531 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of pancreatic cyst fluid is a useful adjunct in the assessment of patients with pancreatic cyst. However, previous studies have been retrospective or single institutional experiences. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate NGS on a multi-institutional cohort of patients with pancreatic cyst in real time. METHODS The performance of a 22-gene NGS panel (PancreaSeq) was first retrospectively confirmed and then within a 2-year timeframe, PancreaSeq testing was prospectively used to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic cyst fluid from 31 institutions. PancreaSeq results were correlated with endoscopic ultrasound findings, ancillary studies, current pancreatic cyst guidelines, follow-up, and expanded testing (Oncomine) of postoperative specimens. RESULTS Among 1933 PCs prospectively tested, 1887 (98%) specimens from 1832 patients were satisfactory for PancreaSeq testing. Follow-up was available for 1216 (66%) patients (median, 23 months). Based on 251 (21%) patients with surgical pathology, mitogen-activated protein kinase/GNAS mutations had 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity for a mucinous cyst (positive predictive value [PPV], 100%; negative predictive value [NPV], 77%). On exclusion of low-level variants, the combination of mitogen-activated protein kinase/GNAS and TP53/SMAD4/CTNNB1/mammalian target of rapamycin alterations had 88% sensitivity and 98% specificity for advanced neoplasia (PPV, 97%; NPV, 93%). Inclusion of cytopathologic evaluation to PancreaSeq testing improved the sensitivity to 93% and maintained a high specificity of 95% (PPV, 92%; NPV, 95%). In comparison, other modalities and current pancreatic cyst guidelines, such as the American Gastroenterology Association and International Association of Pancreatology/Fukuoka guidelines, show inferior diagnostic performance. The sensitivities and specificities of VHL and MEN1/loss of heterozygosity alterations were 71% and 100% for serous cystadenomas (PPV, 100%; NPV, 98%), and 68% and 98% for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PPV, 85%; NPV, 95%), respectively. On follow-up, serous cystadenomas with TP53/TERT mutations exhibited interval growth, whereas pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with loss of heterozygosity of ≥3 genes tended to have distant metastasis. None of the 965 patients who did not undergo surgery developed malignancy. Postoperative Oncomine testing identified mucinous cysts with BRAF fusions and ERBB2 amplification, and advanced neoplasia with CDKN2A alterations. CONCLUSIONS PancreaSeq was not only sensitive and specific for various pancreatic cyst types and advanced neoplasia arising from mucinous cysts, but also reveals the diversity of genomic alterations seen in pancreatic cysts and their clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patricio M Polanco
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Brian A Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Abigail I Wald
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin McGrath
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Randall E Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Asif Khalid
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nisa Kubiliun
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Walter G Park
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jason Klapman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Benjamin Tharian
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Kenneth Fasanella
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John Nasr
- Department of Medicine, Wheeling Hospital, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Jennifer Chennat
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rohit Das
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John DeWitt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Health Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Jeffrey J Easler
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Health Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Benjamin Bick
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Health Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Harkirat Singh
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kimberly J Fairley
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Savreet Sarkaria
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Tarek Sawas
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Wasseem Skef
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California
| | - Adam Slivka
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anna Tavakkoli
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Shyam Thakkar
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Victoria Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Bhaumik Brahmbhatt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Megan Engels
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Charles Gabbert
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mohannad Dugum
- Digestive Health Center, Essentia Health-Duluth Clinic, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Samer El-Dika
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Yasser Bhat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), Mountain View, California
| | - Sanjay Ramrakhiani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), Mountain View, California
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Tielleman
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Carl Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - John Mansour
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Wallis Marsh
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Barbara Centeno
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sara E Monaco
- Department of Pathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - N Paul Ohori
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sigfred Lajara
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Phoenix D Bell
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Katelyn Smith
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Christopher Vandenbussche
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wayne Ernst
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Maria Grupillo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Cihan Kaya
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jin He
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Herbert Zeh
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Marina N Nikiforova
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Adam MA, Glencer A, AlMasri S, Winters S, Bahary N, Singhi A, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH. Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Upfront Resection for Nonpancreatic Periampullary Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:165-174. [PMID: 35925536 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12257-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for periampullary adenocarcinomas is not well studied, with data limited to single-institution retrospective reviews with small cohorts. We sought to compare outcomes of NAT versus upfront resection (UR) for non-PDAC periampullary adenocarcinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified patients who underwent surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary adenocarcinoma, or duodenal adenocarcinoma from 2006 to 2016. We compared outcomes between NAT versus UR groups for each tumor subtype with 1:3 propensity score matching. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS Among 7656 patients who underwent resection for non-PDAC periampullary adenocarcinoma, the proportion of patients who received NAT increased from 6 to 11% for cholangiocarcinoma (p < 0.01), 1 to 4% for ampullary adenocarcinoma (p = 0.01), and 5 to 8% for duodenal adenocarcinoma (p = 0.08). Length of stay, readmission, and 30-day mortality were comparable between NAT and UR. All tumor subtypes were downstaged following NAT (p < 0.01). The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who received NAT, and these patients had improved median overall survival (38 vs 26 months, p < 0.001). After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors and adjuvant chemotherapy, use of NAT was associated with improved survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.89, p = 0.004] but not duodenal or ampullary adenocarcinoma. The survival advantage for cholangiocarcinoma persisted after propensity matching. CONCLUSION This national cohort analysis suggests, for the first time, that neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Alexa Glencer
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Samer AlMasri
- UPMC Network Cancer Registry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sharon Winters
- UPMC Network Cancer Registry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Althans AR, Thompson JR, Rosas SR, Burke JG, Lee KK, Diego EJ, Rosengart MR, Myers SP. Exploring Characteristics of Academic General Surgery Residency Applicants: A Group Concept-Mapping Approach. J Surg Educ 2022; 79:1342-1352. [PMID: 35842403 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Holistic review, which emphasizes qualitative attributes over objective measures, has been proposed as a method for selecting candidates for surgical residency in order to improve diversity in graduate medical education, and, ultimately, the field of surgery. This study seeks to articulate desirable traits of applicants as a first-step in standardizing the holistic review process. DESIGN Using Group Concept Mapping, a web-based mixed-methods participatory research methodology, residency selection committee members were asked to 1) list desirable characteristics of applicants, 2) group these into categories, 3) rate their importance to academic/clinical success on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all important, 5 = extremely important), and 4) rate the degree to which each characteristic is feasible to assess on a 3-point Likert scale (1 = not at all feasible, 3 = very feasible). Grouped characteristics submitted to hierarchical cluster analysis depicted committee's consensus about desirable qualities/criteria for applicants. Bivariate scatter-plots and pattern-matching graphics demonstrated which of these criteria were most important and reliably assessed. SETTING A single academic general surgery residency training program in Western Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS Members of the selection committee for the UPMC General Surgery Residency program who had participated in at least 1 prior cycle of applicant selection. RESULTS Desirable characteristics of highly qualified applicants into an academic general surgery residency were clustered into domains of 1) scholarly work and research, 2) grades/formal assessments, 3) program fit, 4) behavioral assets, and 5) aspiration. Behavioral assets, which was felt to be the most important to clinical and academic success were considered to be the least feasible to reliably assess. Within this domain, initiative, being self-motivated, intellectual curiosity, work ethic, communication skills, maturity and self-awareness, and thoughtfulness were viewed as most frequently reliably assessed from the application and interview process. CONCLUSIONS High quality applicants possess several behavioral assets that faculty deem are important to academic and clinical success. Adapting validated metrics for assessing these assets, may provide a solution for addressing subjectivity and other challenges scrutinized by critics of holistic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison R Althans
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica R Thompson
- Community Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | | | - Jessica G Burke
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Emilia J Diego
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew R Rosengart
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sara P Myers
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ferry AV, Wereski R, Marshall L, Strachan FE, Schulberg SD, Bularga A, Chapman AR, Lee KK, Anand A, Mills NL. Exploring adherence to an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction in the emergency department using mixed-methods. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Incorporating a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay into a care pathway for the assessment of suspected acute coronary syndrome has enabled myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier.
Purpose
Using mixed methods, we explored adherence to an early rule-out pathway in the HiSTORIC (High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin on Presentation to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction) randomised controlled trial.
Methods
In 16,972 consecutive patients we evaluated clinician adherence to an early rule-out pathway for the assessment of suspected acute coronary syndrome. Adherence was defined in patients with presentation cardiac troponin I concentrations <5ng/L and symptom onset >2 hours from presentation without serial troponin testing (type 1 adherence); presentation troponin <5ng/L and symptom onset ≤2 hours from presentation with serial testing (type 2 adherence); or presentation troponin between 5ng/L and sex-specific 99th centile with serial testing (type 3 adherence). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 clinicians to aid interpretation of the quantitative analysis. Qualitative data were coded and organized into themes.
Results
In patients with troponin <5ng/L presenting >2hr from symptom onset, adherence was achieved in 81% of patients. In patients presenting ≤2hr from symptom onset, 35% of patients had a second troponin test. In patients with an initial troponin concentration between 5ng/L and the 99th centile, 65% of patients had a second troponin test. Compared to patients managed by clinicians who were adherent to the pathway, patients with troponin over-testing (type 1 non-adherence) were more likely to be older (mean age 52±16 years versus 58±14, P<0.001) and have a history of coronary disease (11% versus 27%, P<0.001). In contrast, patients with under testing (type 2 non-adherence) tended to be younger (mean age 49±16 versus 63±15, P<0.001), female (50% versus 37%, P<0.001) and have lower presentation troponin levels (median concentration 1.0ng/L IQR 1.0 to 2.0, versus 5.0ng/L IQR 2.0–10.0) compared to those in whom testing was performed according to pathway recommendations. Semi-structured interview data revealed how pathway adherence was influenced by five main themes: guideline characteristics, patient characteristics, the healthcare practitioner, the healthcare system and scientific evidence. Clear visual pathway layout was fundamental in achieving optimal adherence. Strong clinical suspicion of acute coronary syndrome promoted repeat troponin testing and deviation from the pathway was felt to be justifiable by more senior clinicians.
Conclusion
This analysis revealed successful implementation of the early rule-out pathway with interview data aiding interpretation of trial data. Younger patients with lower troponin concentrations were less likely to receive pathway recommended serial troponin testing. Clinical judgement is one of the main reasons for discontinuation of pathway recommendations.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Ferry
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - R Wereski
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - L Marshall
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - F E Strachan
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - S D Schulberg
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - A Bularga
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - A R Chapman
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Doudesis D, Lee KK, Bularga A, Ferry AV, Tuck C, Anand A, Boeddinghaus J, Mueller C, Greenslade JH, Pickering JW, Than MP, Cullen L, Mills NL. Machine learning to optimise use of cardiac troponin in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Guidelines recommend fixed cardiac troponin thresholds for the assessment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, however, performance varies in important patient groups as concentrations are influenced by age, sex and comorbidities. This limitation can be addressed using machine learning algorithms.
Methods
Machine learning algorithms were developed that integrate cardiac troponin concentrations at presentation or on serial testing with age, sex and clinical features in 10,038 consecutive emergency patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. The primary outcome was an adjudicated diagnosis of type 1, type 4b or type 4c myocardial infarction. The best performing algorithm was selected for the CoDE-ACS (Collaboration for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Acute Coronary Syndrome) decision-support tool, and performance was externally validated in 3,035 patients pooled from three prospective studies.
Findings
CoDE-ACS had excellent discrimination and calibration using cardiac troponin at presentation (area under curve [AUC] 0.959, 95% confidence interval 0.948–0.971, Brier score 0.040), in the pooled external validation cohort. At presentation, the rule-out score identified 62.1% (1,885/3,035) of all patients as low-probability of myocardial infarction with a 99.5% (99.1–99.7%) negative predictive value and 97.0% (96.3–97.6%) sensitivity. The rule-in score identified 8.3% (252/3,035) of patients as high-probability with an 83.7% (82.4–85.0%) positive predictive value and 98.5% (98.0–98.9%) specificity. Performance of the rule-out and rule-in scores was consistent across patient subgroups (Figure 1 and Figure 2). CoDE-ACS incorporating a second cardiac troponin measurement also had excellent discrimination and calibration (AUC 0.971 [0.962–0.980], Brier score 0.039) and refined the individualised probabilities in the 29.5% (898/3,035) of patients neither ruled-out or ruled-in at presentation to guide further investigation.
Conclusions
We developed and externally validated the CoDE-ACS decision-support tool using machine learning to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. CoDE-ACS had excellent diagnostic performance to rule-out and rule-in myocardial infarction at presentation, performed consistently across patient subgroups, and provided individualised probabilities to guide further care in those who require serial troponin measurements.
Conclusions
We developed and externally validated the CoDE-ACS decision-support tool using machine learning to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. CoDE-ACS had excellent diagnostic performance to rule-out and rule-in myocardial infarction at presentation, performed consistently across patient subgroups, and provided individualised probabilities to guide further care in those who require serial troponin measurements.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): National Institute for Health ResearchBritish Heart Foundation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Doudesis
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - A Bularga
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - A V Ferry
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - C Tuck
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - J Boeddinghaus
- University of Basel, Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology , Basel , Switzerland
| | - C Mueller
- University of Basel, Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology , Basel , Switzerland
| | - J H Greenslade
- University of Queensland, School of Medicine , Brisbane , Australia
| | - J W Pickering
- University of Otago, Christchurch Heart Institute , Christchurch , New Zealand
| | - M P Than
- Christchurch Hospital , Christchurch , New Zealand
| | - L Cullen
- University of Queensland, School of Medicine , Brisbane , Australia
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bularga A, Kimenai DM, Taggart C, Lowry M, Wereski R, McCance K, Lee KK, Anand A, Strachan FE, Tuck C, Shah ASV, Chapman AR, Newby DE, Jenks S, Mills NL. Impact of patient selection on performance of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction: from research to the real world. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Early rule-out pathways for myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin are widely recommended in the assessment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Although developed in selected patients participating in research studies, these pathways are applied more widely in clinical practice where the diagnostic performance and effectiveness of these pathways may differ.
Purpose
To evaluate the performance of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin in selected and consecutive unselected patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.
Methods
Presentation and serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations were measured in two cohorts of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome presenting to the Emergency Departments across three acute care hospitals in Scotland. In the unselected cohort, electronic health record data were collected on consecutive patients in whom the usual care clinician measured cardiac troponin for suspected acute coronary syndrome. In the selected cohort, patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome were approached between 8am and 8pm by research staff and written informed consent obtained. In both cohorts, the performance of the High-STEACS early rule-out pathway was evaluated for an adjudicated diagnosis of myocardial infarction (type 1, type 4b or type 4c) during the index hospital admission.
Results
The unselected and selected patient cohorts comprised of 1,242 (median age 60 [interquartile range 47–75] years, 46% women) and 1,695 (median age 61 [52–73] years, 40% women) patients respectively. Myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 6% (74/1,242) and 14% (232/1,695) of patients in the unselected and selected patient cohorts respectively. More patients had myocardial infarction ruled-out in the unselected (74% [828/1,112] versus 66% [1,102/1,678]; P<0.001), with similar negative predictive value (99.9% [95% CI 99.7%-100%] versus 99.7% [95% CI 99.4%-99.0%) and sensitivity (99.3% [95% CI 97.4%-100%] versus 98.9% [95% CI 97.6%-99.9%]; Figure 1). In the selected cohort, more patients had intermediate troponin concentrations requiring serial testing (36% versus 29%) or had myocardial infarction diagnosed (34% versus 26%; P<0.001 for both). In contrast, the positive predictive value for myocardial infarction was lower in unselected patients (26.1% [95% CI 21.2%-31.4%] versus 39.9% [95% CI 35.9%-44.0%]).
Conclusion
The prevalence of myocardial infarction is lower in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome evaluated in routine practice compared to those selected to participate in a research study. Whilst more patients have myocardial infarction accurately ruled out, the positive-predictive value in those ruled in is lower resulting in more hospital admissions with elevated cardiac troponin due to other conditions.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bularga
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - D M Kimenai
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - C Taggart
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - M Lowry
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - R Wereski
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - K McCance
- University of Edinburgh, Department Clinical Biochemistry, , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - F E Strachan
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - C Tuck
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - A S V Shah
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Cardiology , London , United Kingdom
| | - A R Chapman
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - D E Newby
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - S Jenks
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Department of Clinical Biochemistry , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Murthy P, Li K, Anderko RR, Singhi AD, DeSilva A, Chopra A, Hammad AY, Paniccia A, Morris A, Lee KK, Mailliard RB, Lotze MT, Methe B, Zureikat AH. Gut microbiota composition and outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer: A prospective biomarker study. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4143 Background: The prognostic role of the gut microbiome, which modulates cancer development and therapeutic response, is unknown in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). With increasing utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) prior to pancreatic cancer surgery, identification of patient-specific biologic signatures associated with NAT response a priori could help inform PDAC precision medicine. Thus, we assessed the influence of the baseline gut microbiome on clinical outcomes in patients with PDAC receiving NAT. Methods: Stool samples were collected at diagnosis from 42 consenting patients with localized PDAC intending to undergo NAT and surgical resection between 2018 and 2020. 16S rRNA sequencing was completed on pre-NAT stool and resected tumor samples. Microbiota alpha diversity and log transformed taxonomic classifications were utilized in multiple regression analyses to predict oncologic outcomes. Results: Five patients progressed during NAT and eight of the 37 operated patients were deemed NAT responders, demonstrating pathologic near complete or partial response (CAP 0-2), T1N0 AJCC 8th staging, and ≥ 80% CA 19-9 reduction. Compared to the gut, the tumor microbiota demonstrated remarkably reduced Shannon diversity (2.4±0.5 vs 1.5±0.4, p< 0.0001) and distinct taxa (75.2±19.7 vs 8.0±4.5, p< 0.0001) and, accordingly, was not associated with clinical outcomes. Overall, several taxa, including Bacteroides and Akkermansia, were enriched in the gut relative to the tumor ( p< 0.001). The gut microbiota of NAT non-responders had an increased proportion of the gemcitabine metabolizing Enterobacteriaceae (additive log ratio (ALR) -3.4±2.0 vs -8.7±0.8, p= 0.0004). NAT responders, by contrast, had an increased proportion of the adaptive immune cell activating Akkermansia (ALR -0.9±1.2 vs -6.2±3.3, p= 0.0004). The incidence of jaundice or biliary stent placement was associated with relative increases in Enterobacteriaceae (+3.3 ALR, p< 0.01 and +4.9 ALR, p< 0.0001) and decreases in Akkermansia (-3.2 ALR, p= 0.02 and -2.4 ALR, p= 0.057), without altering total gut microbiota diversity. Age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, receipt of pre-NAT antibiotics, diagnostic EUS tumor size, resectability, and pre-NAT CA 19-9 were not predictive of NAT response or survival in a univariate regression model. However, inclusion of gut microbiota data improved the ability of the model to predict NAT response ( p= 0.016, adjusted R2 0.76) and survival ( p= 0.001, adjusted R2 0.89), with Enterobacteriaceae (FDR p= 0.012) and Akkermansia (FDR p= 0.015) being significant negative and positive predictors of NAT response, respectively. Conclusions: The baseline gut microbiota could be leveraged as a biomarker of NAT response and prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranav Murthy
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kelvin Li
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Annissa DeSilva
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Asmita Chopra
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | - Alison Morris
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kenneth K. Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Robbie B. Mailliard
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Barbara Methe
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
AlMasri S, Zenati M, Hammad A, Nassour I, Liu H, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, Boone B, Bahary N, Singhi AD, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH. Adaptive Dynamic Therapy and Survivorship for Operable Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2218355. [PMID: 35737385 PMCID: PMC9227002 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used in localized pancreatic carcinoma, and survival is correlated with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels and histopathologic response following neoadjuvant therapy. With several regimens now available, the choice of chemotherapy could be best dictated by response to neoadjuvant therapy (as measured by CA19-9 levels and/or pathologic response), a strategy defined herein as adaptive dynamic therapy. Objective To evaluate the association of adaptive dynamic therapy with oncologic outcomes in patients with surgically resected pancreatic cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients with localized pancreatic cancer who were treated with either gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) preoperatively between 2010 and 2019 at a high-volume tertiary care academic center. Participants were identified from a prospectively maintained database and had a median follow-up of 49 months. Data were analyzed from October 17 to November 24, 2020. Exposures The adaptive dynamic therapy group included 219 patients who remained on or switched to an alternative regimen as dictated by CA19-9 response and for whom the adjuvant regimen was selected based on CA19-9 and/or pathologic response. The nonadaptive dynamic therapy group included 103 patients who had their chemotherapeutic regimen selected independent of CA19-9 and/or tumoral response. Main Outcomes and Measures Prognostic implications of dynamic perioperative therapy assessed through Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and inverse probability weighted estimators. Results A total of 322 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9] years; 162 [50%] women) were identified. The adaptive dynamic therapy group, compared with the nonadaptive dynamic therapy group, had a more pronounced median (IQR) decrease in CA19-9 levels (-80% [-92% to -56%] vs -45% [-81% to -13%]; P < .001), higher incidence of complete or near-complete tumoral response (25 [12%] vs 2 [2%]; P = .007), and lower median (IQR) number of lymph node metastasis (1 [0 to 4] vs 2 [0 to 4]; P = .046). Overall survival was significantly improved in the dynamic group compared with the nondynamic group (38.7 months [95% CI, 34.0 to 46.7 months] vs 26.5 months [95% CI, 23.5 to 32.9 months]; P = .03), and on adjusted analysis, dynamic therapy was independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.99; P = .04). On inverse probability weighted analysis of 320 matched patients, the average treatment effect of dynamic therapy was to increase overall survival by 11.1 months (95% CI, 1.5 to 20.7 months; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study that sought to evaluate the role of adaptive dynamic therapy in localized pancreatic cancer, selecting a chemotherapeutic regimen based on response to preoperative therapy was associated with improved survival. These findings support an individualized and in vivo assessment of response to perioperative therapy in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mazen Zenati
- Department of Surgery, Epidemiology, Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Abdulrahman Hammad
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa E. Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore Hospital System, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Herbert J. Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas
| | - Brian Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K. Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Amer H. Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Das R, McGrath K, Seiser N, Smith K, Uttam S, Brand RE, Fasanella KE, Khalid A, Chennat JS, Sarkaria S, Singh H, Slivka A, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Hogg ME, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Ongchin MC, Pingpank JF, Boone BA, Dasyam AK, Bahary N, Gorantla VC, Rhee JC, Thomas R, Ellsworth S, Landau MS, Ohori NP, Henn P, Shyu S, Theisen BK, Singhi AD. Tumor Size Differences Between Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound and Postoperative Pathology for Neoadjuvant-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Predict Patient Outcome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:886-897. [PMID: 33278573 PMCID: PMC8407441 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The assessment of therapeutic response after neoadjuvant treatment and pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been an ongoing challenge. Several limitations have been encountered when employing current grading systems for residual tumor. Considering endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) represents a sensitive imaging technique for PDAC, differences in tumor size between preoperative EUS and postoperative pathology after neoadjuvant therapy were hypothesized to represent an improved marker of treatment response. METHODS For 340 treatment-naïve and 365 neoadjuvant-treated PDACs, EUS and pathologic findings were analyzed and correlated with patient overall survival (OS). A separate group of 200 neoadjuvant-treated PDACs served as a validation cohort for further analysis. RESULTS Among treatment-naïve PDACs, there was a moderate concordance between EUS imaging and postoperative pathology for tumor size (r = 0.726, P < .001) and AJCC 8th edition T-stage (r = 0.586, P < .001). In the setting of neoadjuvant therapy, a decrease in T-stage correlated with improved 3-year OS rates (50% vs 31%, P < .001). Through recursive partitioning, a cutoff of ≥47% tumor size reduction was also found to be associated with improved OS (67% vs 32%, P < .001). Improved OS using a ≥47% threshold was validated using a separate cohort of neoadjuvant-treated PDACs (72% vs 36%, P < .001). By multivariate analysis, a reduction in tumor size by ≥47% was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS The difference in tumor size between preoperative EUS imaging and postoperative pathology among neoadjuvant-treated PDAC patients is an important prognostic indicator and may guide subsequent chemotherapeutic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohit Das
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Kevin McGrath
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Natalie Seiser
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Katelyn Smith
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Shikhar Uttam
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Randall E Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth E Fasanella
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Asif Khalid
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer S Chennat
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Savreet Sarkaria
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Harkirat Singh
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam Slivka
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, North Shore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melanie C Ongchin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James F Pingpank
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Brian A Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Anil K Dasyam
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vikram C Gorantla
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John C Rhee
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Roby Thomas
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Susannah Ellsworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael S Landau
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - N Paul Ohori
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick Henn
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Susan Shyu
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Brian K Theisen
- Department of Pathology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Blobner BM, Saloman JL, Shelton Ohlsen CA, Brand R, Lafyatis R, Bottino R, Wijkstrom M, Zureikat AH, Lee KK, Singhi AD, Ross MA, Stolz D, Whitcomb DC. Single-cell analyses of human pancreas: characteristics of two populations of acinar cells in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2021; 321:G449-G460. [PMID: 34523348 PMCID: PMC8616588 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00482.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a complex inflammatory disorder with numerous associated genetic and environmental risk factors. The most distressing characteristic of CP is recalcitrant pain, often requiring surgical resection including total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT). We studied five consented subjects undergoing pancreatic resection and processed isolated cells for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq). Using high-dimensional transcriptomic cluster analysis, we identified 11 unique cell clusters in the pancreas tissue. These cell clusters include a cluster of undifferentiated/dedifferentiated cells and two unique clusters of acinar cells, one of which appears to be in a transitional stage. To determine the cellular response to protease inhibitor and stimulation, we treated aliquots of cells from one subject with a protease inhibitor cocktail with and without bethanechol (a muscarinic receptor agonist) at 100 and 400 µM and compared gene expression profiles. The protease inhibitors appeared to reduce cell stress. Pancreatic digestive enzymes and islet hormones were upregulated in both doses of bethanechol-treated cells compared with naïve cells. High-dose bethanechol appeared to be toxic and consistent with hyperstimulation. These studies demonstrate the feasibility of investigating human acinar cell physiology at the single-cell level and initial evidence that these cells retain responsiveness to agonist stimulation with predicted second messenger and transcriptomic responses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We conducted single cell RNA sequencing on pancreas tissue from five individuals. We identified eleven unique cell clusters including a large population of dedifferentiated cells as well as two unique clusters of acinar cells, one of which appears to exist in a transitional state. We also examined the cellular response of pancreas tissue to stimulation and identified affected genes and pathways, including pancreatic digestive enzymes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M. Blobner
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jami L. Saloman
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Celeste A. Shelton Ohlsen
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Randall Brand
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert Lafyatis
- 2Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rita Bottino
- 3Institute of Cellular Therapeutics, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Martin Wijkstrom
- 4Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amer H. Zureikat
- 5Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K. Lee
- 5Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- 6Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mark A. Ross
- 7Center for Biologic Imaging, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Donna Stolz
- 7Center for Biologic Imaging, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,8Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Physiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David C. Whitcomb
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,8Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Physiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,9Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Doudesis D, Lee KK, Anwar M, Astengo F, Newby D, Japp A, Tsanas A, Shah A, Richards M, McMurray J, Mueller C, Januzzi J, Mills N. Machine learning to aid in the diagnosis of acute heart failure in the emergency department. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MRproANP) testing are recommended to aid in the diagnosis of acute heart failure. However, the application of these biomarkers for optimal diagnostic performance is uncertain.
Methods
We performed a systematic review and harmonised individual patient-level data to evaluate the diagnostic performance of BNP and MRproANP for the diagnosis of acute heart failure using random-effects meta-analysis. We subsequently developed and externally validated a decision-support tool called CoDE-HF for both BNP and MRproANP that combines the natriuretic peptide concentrations with clinical variables using machine learning to report the probability of acute heart failure for an individual patient.
Results
Fourteen studies from 12 countries provided individual patient-level data in 8,493 patients for BNP and 3,847 patients for MRproANP, in whom, 48.3% (4,105/8,493) and 41.3% (1,611/3899) had an adjudicated diagnosis of acute heart failure, respectively. The negative and positive predictive values of guideline-recommended thresholds for BNP (100 pg/mL) and MR-proANP (120 pg/mL) were 93.6% (95% confidence interval 88.4–96.6%) and 68.8% (62.9–74.2%), and 95.6% (92.2–97.6%) and 64.8% (56.3–72.5%), respectively. However, we observed significant heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance across important patient subgroups (Figure 1). In the external validation cohort, CoDE-HF was well calibrated with excellent discrimination in those without prior acute heart failure for both BNP and MRproANP (area under the curve of 0.946 [0.933–0.958] and 0.943 [0.921–0.964], and Brier scores of 0.105 and 0.073, respectively). CoDE-HF performed consistently across all subgroups for both BNP and MRproANP, and identified 30% and 65.7% at low-probability (negative predictive value of 99.1% [98.8–99.3%] and 99.1% [98.8–99.4%]), and 30% and 17.3% at high-probability (positive predictive value of 91.3% [90.7–91.9%] and 70.0% [68.5–71.4%]) in those without prior heart failure, respectively (Figure 2).
Conclusion
In an international collaborative analysis, we observed that guideline-recommended thresholds for BNP and MRproANP to diagnose acute heart failure varied significantly across patient subgroups. A decision-support tool using machine learning to combine natriuretic peptides as a continuous measure and other clinical variables provides a more accurate and individualised approach.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Medical Research Council and British Heart Foundation Figure 1. NPV of BNP threshold (100 pg/mL)Figure 2. NPV of the CoDE-HF rule-out score
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Doudesis
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - M Anwar
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - F Astengo
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D Newby
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Japp
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Tsanas
- University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Shah
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - M Richards
- University of Otago, Christchurch Heart Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - J McMurray
- University of Glasgow, BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - C Mueller
- University Hospital Basel, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J Januzzi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - N Mills
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bularga A, Wereski R, Taggart C, Lowry M, Singh T, Lee KK, Anand A, Shah ASV, Ross DA, Perry MR, Dweck MR, Newby DE, Chapman AR, Mills NL. Mechanisms of myocardial injury and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Myocardial injury is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19. However, the prognostic role of myocardial injury in COVID-19 compared to other acute illnesses and the underlying mechanisms of injury are poorly understood.
Methods
In a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study conducted in secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Scotland, all consecutive patients with suspected COVID-19 underwent cardiac troponin (ARCHITECTSTAT high-sensitive troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay; Abbott Laboratories) testing in plasma that was surplus to clinical requirements. The results were not reported unless required by the attending clinician. We evaluated the prevalence of myocardial injury, mechanisms and outcomes in all patients. In those with any hs-cTnI concentration above the sex-specific 99th centile the diagnosis was adjudicated according to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality was compared in those with and without myocardial injury and COVID-19 by cox regression adjusted for age, sex, renal function and co-morbidities.
Results
A total of 2,916 (median age 69 [interquartile range, IQR 54–79] years, 53% women) consecutive patients with suspected COVID-19 were followed up for 228 [IQR 203–249] days. Myocardial injury occurred in 26% (750/2,916) with a median troponin concentration of 66 [35–178] ng/L; the prevalence was 41% (46/112) and 25% (704/2,804) in those with and without COVID-19, respectively. The most common mechanism was acute non-ischaemic myocardial injury occurring in 80% (37/46) and 71% (502/704) of patients with and without COVID-19, respectively. Type 1 myocardial infarction (2% and 4%), type 2 myocardial infarction (7% and 14%) and chronic myocardial injury (11% and 11%) were less common and only one patient had confirmed myocarditis. In patients with myocardial injury mortality was increased compared to those without (P<0.001 log rank), whether they had COVID-19 (54% [25/46] versus 26% [17/66]) or not (35% [248/704] versus 14% [294/2100]). Myocardial injury was an independent predictor of death in all patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71 to 2.43), but this excess risk was not higher in patients with COVID-19 (aHR 1.58, 95% CI 0.75 to 3.15) compared to those without the condition (aHR 2.01, 95% CI 1.81 to 2.49).
Conclusion
Myocardial injury is common in hospitalised patients with suspected COVID-19 whether or not COVID-19 was the cause of their presentation. The majority of patients had acute non-ischaemic myocardial injury rather than a defined cardiac condition. Despite this the presence of myocardial injury was an independent predictor of death in all hospitalised patients.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation Kaplan-Meier curve for all-cause death
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bularga
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - R Wereski
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - C Taggart
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - M Lowry
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - T Singh
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A S V Shah
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Cardiology, London, United Kingdom
| | - D A Ross
- Western General Hospital, Regional Infectious Disease Unit, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - M R Perry
- Western General Hospital, Regional Infectious Disease Unit, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - M R Dweck
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D E Newby
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A R Chapman
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rieser CJ, Narayanan S, Bahary N, Bartlett DL, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Smith K, Zureikat AH. Optimal management of patients with operable pancreatic head cancer: A Markov decision analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:801-809. [PMID: 34231222 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is an emerging strategy for operable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While NAT increases multimodal therapy completion, it risks functional decline and treatment dropout. We used decision analysis to determine optimal management of localized PDAC and consider risks faced by elderly patients. METHODS A Markov cohort decision analysis model evaluated treatment options for a 60-year-old patient with resectable PDAC: (1) upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy or (2) NAT. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. A subanalysis considered the scenario of a 75-year-old patient. RESULTS For the base case, NAT offered an incremental survival gain of 4.6 months compared with SF (overall survival: 26.3 vs. 21.7 months). In one-way sensitivity analyses, findings were sensitive to recurrence-free survival for NAT patients undergoing adjuvant, probability of completing NAT, and probability of being resectable at exploration after NAT. On probabilistic analysis, NAT was favored in a majority of trials (97%) with a median survival benefit of 5.1 months. In altering the base case for the 75-year-old scenario, NAT had a survival benefit of 3.8 months. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrates a significant benefit to NAT in patients with localized PDAC. This benefit persists even in the elderly cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sowmya Narayanan
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth Smith
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chopra A, Zamora R, Vodovotz Y, Hodges JC, Barclay D, Brand R, Simmons RL, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Murthy P, Lotze MT, Boone BA, Zureikat AH. Baseline Plasma Inflammatory Profile Is Associated With Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J Immunother 2021; 44:185-192. [PMID: 33935273 PMCID: PMC8102434 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Despite its increased application in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), complete response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is rare. Given the critical role of host immunity in regulating cancer, we sought to correlate baseline inflammatory profiles to significant response to NAT. PDAC patients receiving NAT were classified as responders (R) or nonresponders (NR) by carbohydrate antigen 19-9 response, pathologic tumor size, and lymph node status in the resected specimen. Baseline (treatment-naive) plasma was analyzed to determine levels of 27 inflammatory mediators. Logistic regression was used to correlate individual mediators with response. Network analysis and Pearson correlation maps were derived to determine baseline inflammatory mediator profiles. Forty patients (20R and 20NR) met study criteria. The R showed significantly higher overall survival (59.4 vs. 21.25 mo, P=0.002) and disease-free survival (50.97 vs. 10.60 mo, P=0.005), compared with NR. soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha was a significant predictor of no response to NAT (P=0.045). Analysis of inflammatory profiles using the Pearson heat map analysis followed by network analysis depicted increased inflammatory network complexity in NR compared with R (1.69 vs. 1), signifying a more robust baseline inflammatory status of NR. A panel of inflammatory mediators identified by logistic regression and Fischer score analysis was used to create a potential decision tree to predict NAT response. We demonstrate that baseline inflammatory profiles are associated with response to NAT in PDAC, and that an upregulated inflammatory status is associated with a poor response to NAT. Further analysis into the role of inflammatory mediators as predictors of chemotherapy response is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmita Chopra
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ruben Zamora
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yoram Vodovotz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jacob C. Hodges
- Wolff Center of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Derek Barclay
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Randall Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Richard L. Simmons
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Pranav Murthy
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael T. Lotze
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Departments of Immunology and Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brian A. Boone
- Department of Surgery and Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Amer H. Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Murthy P, Zenati MS, AlMasri SS, Singhi AD, DeSilva A, Paniccia A, Lee KK, Simmons RL, Bahary N, Lotze MT, Zureikat AH. Impact of G-CSF during neoadjuvant therapy on outcomes of operable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.4126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4126 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease characterized by chronic inflammation and a tolerogenic immune response. Neutropenia is a common side effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy, managed with administration of recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, Filgrastim). The interleukin 17 – G-CSF – neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) axis promotes oncogenesis and progression of PDAC, inhibiting adaptive immunity. We evaluated the impact of G-CSF administration during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) on oncologic outcomes in patients with operable pancreatic cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with localized PDAC treated with NAT prior to pancreatic resection between 2014 – 2020 was completed at a single institution. G-CSF administration, type, and dose were collected from inpatient and outpatient medical records. Results: Of 351 patients treated, 138 (39%) received G-CSF during NAT with a median follow-up of 45.8 months. Patients who received G-CSF were younger (64.0 vs 66.7, p = 0.008), had lower BMI (26.5 vs 27.9, p = 0.021), and were more likely to receive 5-FU based chemotherapy (42% vs 28.2%, p < 0.0001), NAT dose reduction (40.6% vs 25.4%, p = 0.003), or experience febrile neutropenia (8.7% vs 3.3%, p = 0.029). No differences were observed in baseline or pathologic tumor staging. In patients who received G-CSF, 130 (94%) received Pegfilgrastim with a median cumulative dose of 12 mg (IQR 6-12). Patients who received G-CSF were more likely to have an elevated post-NAT neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (45% vs 29.6%, p = 0.004) and systemic immune-inflammation index (39.5% vs 29.6%, p = 0.061). Receiving G-CSF was an independent predictor of perineural invasion (HR 2.4, 95 CI [1.08, 5.5], p = 0.031) and margin positive resection (HR 1.69, 95 CI [1.01, 2.83], p = 0.043). Patients who received G-CSF had decreased overall survival compared to patients who did not receive G-CSF (median OS: 29.2 vs 38.7 months, p = 0.0001). Receiving G-CSF during NAT was an independent negative predictor of progression free (HR 1.38, 95 CI [1.04, 1.83], p = 0.022) and overall survival (HR 2.02, 95 CI [1.45, 2.79], p < 0.0001). In a subset of patients with available pre- and post-NAT serum specimens (n = 28), G-CSF administration resulted in an increased number of citrullinated histone H3 complexes following NAT (+1378±1502 vs -300.7±1147 pg/ml, p = 0.007), indicative of enhanced peripheral NET formation. Conclusions: In patients with localized PDAC receiving NAT prior to surgical extirpation, G-CSF administration is associated with worse oncologic outcomes and should be administered with caution. Prospective randomized as well as confirmatory clinical studies are in order.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranav Murthy
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Annissa DeSilva
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Kenneth K. Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hoehn RS, Rieser CJ, Winters S, Stitt L, Hogg ME, Bartlett DL, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Ohr JP, Gorantla VC, Krishnamurthy A, Rhee JC, Bahary N, Olson AC, Burton S, Ellsworth SG, Slivka A, McGrath K, Khalid A, Fasanella K, Chennat J, Brand RE, Das R, Sarkaria R, Singhi AD, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. ASO Visual Abstract: A Pancreatic Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic Eliminates Socioeconomic Disparities in Treatment and Improves Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2021. [PMID: 33709172 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09726-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard S Hoehn
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Caroline J Rieser
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sharon Winters
- Cancer Registries, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren Stitt
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James P Ohr
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Vikram C Gorantla
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anuradha Krishnamurthy
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John C Rhee
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adam C Olson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steve Burton
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adam Slivka
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kevin McGrath
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Asif Khalid
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth Fasanella
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Chennat
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Randal E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rohit Das
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ritu Sarkaria
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vipperla K, Kanakis A, Slivka A, Althouse AD, Brand RE, Phillips AE, Chennat J, Papachristou GI, Lee KK, Zureikat AH, Whitcomb DC, Yadav D. Natural course of pain in chronic pancreatitis is independent of disease duration. Pancreatology 2021; 21:649-657. [PMID: 33674197 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pain burn-out during the course of chronic pancreatitis (CP), proposed in the 1980s, remains controversial, and has clinical implications. We aimed to describe the natural course of pain in a well-characterized cohort. METHODS We constructed the clinical course of 279 C P patients enrolled from 2000 to 2014 in the North American Pancreatitis Studies from UPMC by retrospectively reviewing their medical records (median observation period, 12.4 years). We assessed abdominal pain at different time points, characterized pain pattern (Type A [short-lived pain episodes] or B [persistent pain and/or clusters of recurrent severe pain]) and recorded information on relevant covariates. RESULTS Pain at any time, at the end of follow-up, Type A pain pattern or B pain pattern was reported by 89.6%, 46.6%, 34% and 66% patients, respectively. In multivariable analyses, disease duration (time from first diagnosis of pancreatitis to end of observation) did not associate with pain - at last clinical contact (OR, 1.0, 95% CI 0.96-1.03), at NAPS2 enrollment (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.07) or Type B pain pattern (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97-1.04). Patients needing endoscopic or surgical therapy (97.8 vs. 75.2%, p < 0.001) and those with alcohol etiology (94.7 vs. 84.9%, p = 0.007) had a higher prevalence of pain. In multivariable analyses, invasive therapy associated with Type B pain and pain at last clinical contact. CONCLUSIONS Only a subset of CP patients achieve durable pain relief. There is urgent need to develop new strategies to evaluate and manage pain, and to identify predictors of response to pain therapies for CP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kishore Vipperla
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Allison Kanakis
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adam Slivka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew D Althouse
- Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Randall E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anna E Phillips
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Chennat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Georgios I Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David C Whitcomb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dhiraj Yadav
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rieser CJ, Zenati M, Narayanan S, Bahary N, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Bartlett DL, Zureikat AH. Optimal Management of Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer in the Elderly Patient: Does Neoadjuvant Therapy Offer a Survival Benefit? Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6264-6272. [PMID: 33748894 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09822-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is a growing strategy for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Elderly patients are at increased risk of treatment withdrawal due to functional decline, and the benefit of NAT in this cohort remains to be studied. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of elderly patients with resectable head PDAC who underwent NAT or a surgery-first (SF) approach. METHODS All patients 75 years of age and older with radiographically resectable (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria) PDAC who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single institution from 2008 to 2017 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the SF and NAT cohorts. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by treatment strategy. RESULTS Overall, 158 patients were identified: SF cohort = 90 (57%) and NAT cohort = 68 (43%). Patients in the SF cohort were older (80 vs. 78 years; p = 0.01) but there were no differences in preoperative comorbidities or frailty indices. SF patients had a trend toward higher rates of major complications (38% vs. 24%; p = 0.06) with higher Comprehensive Complication Index totals (20.9 vs. 20; p = 0.03). There were similar rates of adjuvant therapy. NAT was associated with significantly longer OS (24.6 vs. 17.6 months; p = 0.01) in both the intent-to-treat and resected cohorts. On multivariable analysis (MVA), NAT remained an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 0.60; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION NAT is safe and effective for elderly patients with PDAC. This study suggests NAT is associated with fewer complications after surgery, equal rates of adjuvant therapy receipt, and increased OS over a surgery-first approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mazen Zenati
- Department of Surgery and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sowmya Narayanan
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hrebinko K, Tohme S, Hoehn RS, AlMasri S, Khan S, Kaltenmeier C, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Zureikat A, Nassour I. A National Assessment of Optimal Oncologic Surgery for Distal Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas. Pancreas 2021; 50:386-392. [PMID: 33835970 PMCID: PMC8670387 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to create a composite measure, optimal oncologic surgery (OOS), for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and identify factors associated with OOS. METHODS Adult patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2016. Patients were stratified based on receipt of OOS. Criteria for OOS included 90-day survival, no 30-day readmission, length of stay ≤7 days, negative resection margins, ≥12 lymph nodes harvested, and receipt of chemotherapy. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of OOS. Survival curves and a Cox proportional hazards model were created to compare survival and identify risk factors for mortality. RESULTS Three thousand five hundred forty-six patients were identified. The rate of OOS was 22.3%. Diagnosis after 2012, treatment at an academic medical center, and a minimally invasive surgical approach (MIS) were associated with OOS. Survival was superior for patients undergoing OOS. Decreasing age at diagnosis, fewer comorbidities, surgery at an academic medical center, MIS, and lower pathologic stage were also associated with improved survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Rates of OOS for distal pancreatectomy are low. Time trends show increasing rates of OOS that may be related to increasing MIS, adjuvant chemotherapy, and referrals to academic medical centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Hrebinko
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
AlMasri S, Zenati MS, Papachristou GI, Slivka A, Sanders M, Chennat J, Rabinowitz M, Khalid A, Gelrud A, Nasr J, Sarkaria S, Das R, Lee KK, Schraut W, Hughes SJ, Moser AJ, Paniccia A, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. Correction to: Laparoscopic‑assisted ERCP following RYGB: a 12‑year assessment of outcomes and learning curve at a high‑volume pancreatobiliary center. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:631. [PMID: 33598813 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08396-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Department of Surgery and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Adam Slivka
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Chennat
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Asif Khalid
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andres Gelrud
- Department of Internal Medicine, Miami Cancer Institute, Gastro Health, Miami, FL, USA
| | - John Nasr
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Savreet Sarkaria
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rohit Das
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Wolfgang Schraut
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Steve J Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - A James Moser
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore Hospital System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Myers SP, Dasari M, Brown JB, Lumpkin ST, Neal MD, Abebe KZ, Chaumont N, Downs-Canner SM, Flanagan MR, Lee KK, Rosengart MR. Effects of Gender Bias and Stereotypes in Surgical Training: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:552-560. [PMID: 32432669 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Factors contributing to underrepresentation of women in surgery are incompletely understood. Pro-male bias and stereotype threat appear to contribute to gender imbalance in surgery. Objectives To evaluate the association between pro-male gender bias and career engagement and the effect of stereotype threat on skill performance among trainees in academic surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants A 2-phase study with a double-blind, randomized clinical trial component was conducted in 3 academic general surgery training programs. Residents were recruited between August 1 and August 15, 2018, and the study was completed at the end of that academic year. In phase 1, surveys administered 5 to 6 months apart investigated the association of gender bias with career engagement. In phase 2, residents were randomized 1:1 using permuted-block design stratified by site, training level, and gender to receive either a trigger of or protection against stereotype threat. Immediately after the interventions, residents completed the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) assessment followed by a final survey. A total of 131 general surgery residents were recruited; of these 96 individuals with academic career interests met eligibility criteria; 86 residents completed phase 1. Eighty-five residents were randomized in phase 2, and 4 residents in each arm were lost to follow-up. Intervention Residents read abstracts that either reported that women had worse laparoscopic skill performance than men (trigger of stereotype threat [A]) or had no difference in performance (protection against stereotype threat [B]). Main Outcomes and Measures Association between perception of pro-male gender bias and career engagement survey scores (phase 1) and stereotype threat intervention and FLS scores (phase 2) were the outcomes. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Results Seventy-seven residents (38 women [49.4%]) completed both phases of the study. The association between pro-male gender bias and career engagement differed by gender (interaction coefficient, -1.19; 95% CI, -1.90 to -0.49; P = .02); higher perception of bias was associated with higher engagement among men (coefficient, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.19-2.24; P = .04), but no significant association was observed among women (coefficient, -0.25; 95% CI, -1.59 to 1.08; P = .50). There was no evidence of a difference in FLS score between interventions (mean [SD], A: 395 [150] vs B: 367 [157]; P = .51). The response to stereotype threat activation was similar in men and women (interaction coefficient, 15.1; 95% CI, -124.5 to 154.7; P = .39). The association between stereotype threat activation and FLS score differed by gender across levels of susceptibility to stereotype threat (interaction coefficient, -35.3; 95% CI, -47.0 to -23.6; P = .006). Higher susceptibility to stereotype threat was associated with lower FLS scores among women who received a stereotype threat trigger (coefficient, -43.4; 95% CI, -48.0 to -38.9; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance Perception of pro-male bias and gender stereotypes may influence career engagement and skill performance, respectively, among surgical trainees. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03623009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara P Myers
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mohini Dasari
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Joshua B Brown
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephanie T Lumpkin
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine
| | - Matthew D Neal
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kaleab Z Abebe
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicole Chaumont
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine
| | | | - Meghan R Flanagan
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew R Rosengart
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
AlMasri S, Zenati MS, Papachristou GI, Slivka A, Sanders M, Chennat J, Rabinowitz M, Khalid A, Gelrud A, Nasr J, Sarkaria S, Das R, Lee KK, Schraut W, Hughes SJ, Moser AJ, Paniccia A, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. Laparoscopic-assisted ERCP following RYGB: a 12-year assessment of outcomes and learning curve at a high-volume pancreatobiliary center. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:621-630. [PMID: 33543349 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08328-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment of pancreaticobiliary pathology following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) poses significant technical challenges. Laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LA-ERCP) can overcome those anatomical hurdles, allowing access to the papilla. Our aims were to analyze our 12-year institutional outcomes and determine the learning curve for LA-ERCP. METHODS A retrospective review of cases between 2007 and 2019 at a high-volume pancreatobiliary unit was performed. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of specific outcomes. To identify the learning curve, CUSUM analyses and innovative methods for standardizing the surgeon's timelines were performed. RESULTS 131 patients underwent LA-ERCP (median age 60, 81% females) by 17 surgeons and 10 gastroenterologists. Cannulation of the papilla was achieved in all cases. Indications were choledocholithiasis (78%), Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction/Papillary stenosis (18%), management of bile leak (2%) and stenting/biopsy of malignant strictures (2%). Median total, surgical and ERCP times were 180, 128 and 48 min, respectively, and 47% underwent concomitant cholecystectomy. Surgical site infection developed in 9.2% and post-ERCP pancreatitis in 3.8%. Logistic regression revealed multiple abdominal operations and magnitude of BMI decrease (between RYGB and LA-ERCP) to be predictive of conversion to open approach. CUSUM analysis of operative time demonstrated a learning curve at case 27 for the surgical team and case 9 for the gastroenterology team. On binary cut analysis, 3-5 cases per surgeon were needed to optimize operative metrics. CONCLUSION LA-ERCP is associated with high success rates and low adverse events. We identify outcome benchmarks and a learning curve for new adopters of this increasingly performed procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Department of Surgery and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Adam Slivka
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Chennat
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Asif Khalid
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andres Gelrud
- Department of Internal Medicine, Miami Cancer Institute, Gastro Health, Miami, FL, USA
| | - John Nasr
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Savreet Sarkaria
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rohit Das
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Wolfgang Schraut
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Steve J Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - A James Moser
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore Hospital System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Ave., Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hoehn RS, Rieser CJ, Winters S, Stitt L, Hogg ME, Bartlett DL, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Ohr JP, Gorantla VC, Krishnamurthy A, Rhee JC, Bahary N, Olson AC, Burton S, Ellsworth SG, Slivka A, McGrath K, Khalid A, Fasanella K, Chennat J, Brand RE, Das R, Sarkaria R, Singhi AD, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. A Pancreatic Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic Eliminates Socioeconomic Disparities in Treatment and Improves Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:2438-2446. [PMID: 33523364 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09594-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
AIMS National studies have demonstrated disparities in the treatment and survival of pancreatic cancer patients based on socioeconomic status (SES). This study aimed to identify specific differences in perioperative management and outcomes based on patient SES and to study the role of a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) in mitigating any variations. METHODS The study analyzed patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a large hospital system. The patients were categorized into groups of high and low SES and whether they were managed by the authors' pancreatic cancer MDC or not. The study compared differences in disease characteristics, receipt of multimodality therapy, perioperative outcomes, and recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS Of the 162 low-SES patients and 119 high-SES patients, 54% were managed in the MDC. Outside the MDC, low-SES patients were less likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had less minimally invasive surgery, a longer OR time, less enhanced recovery participation, and more major complications (p < 0.05). No SES disparities were observed among the MDC patients. Despite similar tumor characteristics, the low-SES patients had inferior median overall survival (21 vs 32 months; p = 0.005), but the MDC appeared to eliminate this disparity. Low SES correlated with inferior survival for the non-MDC patients (17 vs 32 months; p < 0.001), but not for the MDC patients (24 vs 25 months; p = 0.33). These findings persisted in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION A pancreatic cancer MDC standardizes treatment decisions, eliminates disparities in surgical outcomes, and improves survival for low-SES patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard S Hoehn
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sharon Winters
- Cancer Registries, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren Stitt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James P Ohr
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Vikram C Gorantla
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anuradha Krishnamurthy
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John C Rhee
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adam C Olson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steve Burton
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adam Slivka
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kevin McGrath
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Asif Khalid
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth Fasanella
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Chennat
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Randal E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rohit Das
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ritu Sarkaria
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ooka K, Singh H, Warndorf MG, Saul M, Althouse AD, Dasyam A, Paragomi P, Phillips AE, Zureikat AH, Lee KK, Slivka A, Papachristou GI, Yadav D. Groove pancreatitis has a spectrum of severity and can be managed conservatively. Pancreatology 2021; 21:81-88. [PMID: 33309222 PMCID: PMC9078205 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The natural history of groove pancreatitis is incompletely characterized. Published literature suggests a high rate of surgery. We describe the short- and long-term outcomes in a cohort of patients with groove pancreatitis treated at our institution. METHODS Medical records of patients hospitalized in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center system from 2000 to 2014 and diagnosed with groove pancreatitis based on imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical presentation and outcomes during index admission and follow-up were recorded. RESULTS Forty-eight patients with groove pancreatitis were identified (mean age 53.2 years, 79% male). Seventy-one percent were alcohol abusers and an equal number were cigarette smokers. Prior histories of acute and chronic pancreatitis were noted in 30 (62.5%) and 21 (43.8%), respectively. Forty-four (91.7%) met criteria for acute pancreatitis during their index admission. Alcohol was the most common etiology (68.8%). No patient experienced organ failure. The most frequent imaging findings were fat stranding in the groove (83.3%), duodenal wall thickening (52.1%), and soft tissue mass/thickening in the groove (50%). Over a mean follow-up of 5.0 years, seven (14.6%) required a pancreas-related surgery. Patients had a high burden of pancreatitis-related readmissions (68.8%, 69.4/100 patient-years). Incident diabetes and chronic pancreatitis were diagnosed in 5 (13.9% of patients at risk) and 8 (29.6% of patients at risk) respectively. CONCLUSIONS Groove pancreatitis has a wide spectrum of severity; most patients have mild disease. These patients have a high burden of readmissions and progression to chronic pancreatitis. A small minority requires surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohtaro Ooka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York University
| | - Harkirat Singh
- University of Pittsburgh, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
| | | | - Melissa Saul
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Andrew D. Althouse
- University of Pittsburgh. Center for Research on Health Care Data Center
| | - Anil Dasyam
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology
| | - Pedram Paragomi
- University of Pittsburgh, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
| | - Anna Evans Phillips
- University of Pittsburgh, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
| | | | | | - Adam Slivka
- University of Pittsburgh, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
| | - Georgios I. Papachristou
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
| | - Dhiraj Yadav
- University of Pittsburgh, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
AlMasri S, Nassour I, Kowalsky SJ, Hrebinko K, Singhi AD, Lee KK, Choudry HA, Bartlett D, Zureikat A, Paniccia A. The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Goblet Cell Carcinoid of the Appendix: An 11-Year Experience from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3873-3881. [PMID: 33231767 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09389-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoids (GCC) are an aggressive, albeit rare, subtype of appendiceal tumors that exhibit distinct histologic features and lack clear treatment guidelines. We aimed to ascertain the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for GCC in a national cohort of patients. METHODS Patients who underwent a right hemicolectomy for stage I-III GCC of the appendix between 2006 and 2016 were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Stratification based on AC receipt was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to identify predictors of overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 867 patients were identified, of whom 124 (14%) received AC. Patients in the AC group were significantly younger (54 vs. 57 years; p = 0.006) and were predominantly of male sex (60 vs. 48%; p = 0.012). On histopathology, patients in the AC group had a higher proportion of poorly/undifferentiated grade (27 vs. 5%; p < 0.001), T4 disease (35 vs. 11%; p < 0.001), and lymph node-positive disease (45 vs. 7%; p < 0.001) than patients who did not receive AC. After excluding patients diagnosed in 2016 due to a lack of follow-up data (n = 162), a survival advantage for the AC group was detected only after stratification for lymph node-positive disease (p = 0.007). On Cox proportional hazard regression, AC demonstrated an independent association with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.084-0.683; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION The current analysis from the NCDB supports the role of AC for GCC of the appendix, chiefly for patients with lymph node metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Stacy J Kowalsky
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Katherine Hrebinko
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Haroon A Choudry
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chopra A, Hodges JC, Olson A, Burton S, Ellsworth SG, Bahary N, Singhi AD, Boone BA, Beane JD, Bartlett D, Lee KK, Hogg ME, Lotze MT, Paniccia A, Zeh H, Zureikat AH. Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiation in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Case-Control Matched Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3779-3788. [PMID: 33231769 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09391-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is unknown whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy (NCRT vs. NAC). We aim to compare pathological and survival outcomes of NCRT and NAC in patients with PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Single-center analysis of PDAC patients treated with NCRT or NAC followed by resection between December 2008 and December 2018 was performed. Average treatment effect (ATE) was estimated after case-control matching using Mahalanobis distance nearest-neighbor matching. Inverse probability weighted estimates (IPWE)-based ATE was estimated for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among the 418 patients (mean age 66.8 years, 51% female) included in the study, 327 received NAC and 91 received NCRT. NCRT patients had higher rates of locally advanced disease, number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles, more chemotherapy regimen crossover (gemcitabine and 5-FU based), and were more likely to undergo open surgical procedures and/or vascular resection (all p < 0.05). After matched analysis, NCRT was associated with a significant reduction in lymph node positive disease [ATE = (-)0.24, p = 0.007] and lymphovascular invasion [ATE = (-)0.20, p = 0.02]. While NCRT was associated with significantly improved DFS by 9.5 months (p = 0.006), it did not affect OS by IPWE-based ATE after adjusting for adjuvant therapy (ATE = 5.5 months; p = 0.32). CONCLUSION Compared with NAC alone, NCRT is associated with improved pathologic surrogates and disease-free survival, but not overall survival in patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmita Chopra
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Adam Olson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steve Burton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brian A Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Joal D Beane
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T Lotze
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Herbert Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Liu H, Zenati MS, Rieser CJ, Al-Abbas A, Lee KK, Singhi AD, Bahary N, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. CA19-9 Change During Neoadjuvant Therapy May Guide the Need for Additional Adjuvant Therapy Following Resected Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:3950-3960. [PMID: 32318949 PMCID: PMC7931260 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08468-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly utilized for pancreatic cancer, however the added benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) in this setting is unknown. We hypothesized that the magnitude of CA19-9 response to NAT can guide the need for further AT in resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS CA19-9 secretors who received NAT for pancreatic cancer during 2008-2016 at a single institution were analyzed and CA19-9 response (difference between pre- and post-NAT values) was measured. Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazard ratio models were used to determine the optimal CA19-9 response at which AT ceases to confer any additional survival benefit after NAT. RESULTS A total of 241 patients (mean age 65.4 years, 50% female) with complete CA19-9 data who underwent NAT followed by resection were analyzed. In a cohort of patients (n = 78) in whom CA19-9 normalized with a decrease > 50% after NAT (optimal responders), AT was not associated with additional survival benefit (40.6 vs. 39.0 months, p = 0.815). Conversely, in the cohort of patients (n = 163) in whom NAT was not associated with normalization and a decrease of ≤ 50% in CA19-9 (suboptimal responders), receipt of AT was associated with a survival benefit (34.5 vs. 19.1 months, p < 0.001) following NAT. A Cox proportional hazards model confirmed CA19-9 normalization and decrease > 50% during NAT to predict no additional survival benefit from AT. CONCLUSIONS The magnitude of CA19-9 response to NAT may predict the need for further AT in resected pancreatic cancer. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the optimal interplay of NAT and AT in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Liu
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Department of Surgery and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amr Al-Abbas
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Crouch G, Sinha S, Lo S, Saw RPM, Lee KK, Stretch J, Shannon K, Guitera P, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Ch'ng S. Clinical outcomes following surgical treatment of lentigo maligna of the head and neck. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:1145-1151. [PMID: 33023795 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lentigo maligna (LM), a subtype of melanoma in-situ commonly occurring in the head and neck region, often presents a treatment challenge due to anatomical constraints, particularly on the face of mostly elderly patients. This study sought to assess the clinical outcomes of wide local excision of head and neck LM, identify predictors of recurrence and define optimal excision margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with LM treated between January 1997 and December 2012 were identified from the large institutional database of a tertiary center and their data were analyzed. RESULTS In 379 patients, 382 lesions were eligible for analysis. Median maximal lesion diameter was 10.5 mm. The mean surgical excision and histopathological clearance margins were 6.2 mm and 4.0 mm, respectively. Median follow-up was 32 months. The LM recurrence rate was 9.9%, and subsequent invasive melanoma developed in 2.3% of cases (mean Breslow thickness 0.7 mm). The recurrence rate was 27.2% if the histological margin was <3.0 mm (median time to recurrence 46.5 months) compared with 2.6% if the margin was ≥3.0 mm. The mean surgical margin required to achieve a histological clearance of ≥3.0 mm was 6.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that to minimize recurrence, a histological margin of ≥3.0 mm is required. To achieve this, a surgical margin of ≥6.5 mm was required. This is greater than the 5 mm margin recommended in some national guidelines. Careful long-term follow-up is required for all patients because of the risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth Crouch
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shiba Sinha
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Serigne Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan Stretch
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kerwin Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Head & Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Center, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pascale Guitera
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Center, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia(-)
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
AlMasri S, Nassour I, Tohme S, Adam MA, Hoehn RS, Bartlett DL, Lee KK, Zureikat AH, Paniccia A. Long-term survival following minimally invasive extended cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A 7-year experience from the National Cancer Database. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:707-715. [PMID: 32531820 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open extended cholecystectomy (O-EC) has long been the recommended treatment for resectable gallbladder cancer (GBC), while the minimally-invasive approach for EC (MIS-EC) remains controversial. Our aim was to analyze overall survival of GBC patients treated with MIS-EC vs O-EC at the national level. METHODS A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database of patients with resectable GBC (2010-2016) and treated with either MIS-EC or O-EC was performed. Overall survival (OS) was compared by the surgical approach. RESULTS A total of 680 patients were identified, of whom 235 (34.6%) underwent MIS-EC. There were no differences in the rates of positive margins between MIS-EC and O-EC (14% vs 19%, respectively; P = .278), and in the mean lymph node yield (6.54 vs 6.66, respectively; P = .914). The median survival following MIS-EC was significantly higher than that of O-EC (39 vs 26 months; P = .048). After stratification by pathological stage and after adjustment, there was no significant difference in OS between the groups (HR = 0.9, 95% CI, 0.6-1.5). CONCLUSION In this large national cohort, MIS-EC oncologic outcomes were noninferior to the O-EC. Proficiency with MIS techniques, proper patient selection, and referral to specialized centers may allow a greater benefit from this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samer Tohme
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard S Hoehn
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David L Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Harris CG, Lo S, Ahmed T, Scolyer RA, Ferguson PM, Karim RZ, Lam TK, Lee KK, Shannon KF, Spillane AJ, Stretch JR, Thompson JF, Saw RP. Primary dermal melanoma: clinical behaviour, prognosis and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:2131-2139. [PMID: 32417156 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary dermal melanoma (PDM) is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma, confined to the dermis, which poses a challenging clinical dilemma. It may represent a true primary melanoma or a dermal cutaneous metastasis. This study aimed to delineate the histopathological characteristics and prognosis of PDM in a large patient cohort to guide appropriate treatment strategies. METHODS A search of the Melanoma Research Database at Melanoma Institute Australia was conducted to identify all possible PDM patients at our institution diagnosed from 1978 to 2013. Overall, melanoma-specific and disease-free survival outcomes of the PDM group were compared to those of similar cohorts of Stage I-II and Stage IV M1a melanoma patients based on propensity score matching. RESULTS Sixty-two PDM patients were identified from the MRD with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Five-year survival was 87.1% and overall survival was 74.2%. PDMs had a significantly improved overall survival (p = 0.0002) and melanoma-specific survival (p = 0.001) compared to Stage I-II controls, however there was no difference in disease-free survival (p = 0.08). PDMs also demonstrated improved overall survival (p < 0.0001), melanoma-specific survival (p < 0.0001) and disease-free survival (p < 0.0001) compared to Stage IV M1a controls. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate that PDMs have a more favorable prognosis compared to stage I-II cutaneous melanomas and suggest that these are in fact true primary lesions. This study thus provides evidence to justify a treatment approach, by way of a wide local excision and possibly sentinel lymph node biopsy, as for early stage primary cutaneous melanomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Harris
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter M Ferguson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rooshdiya Z Karim
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tai Khoa Lam
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn Pm Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nassour I, Winters SB, Hoehn R, Tohme S, Adam MA, Bartlett DL, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic and open pancreatectomy in a national cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:234-242. [PMID: 32350882 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic pancreatectomy is gaining momentum; however, limited data exist on the long-term survival of this approach for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The objective of this study is to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) to open surgery in patients with PDAC. STUDY DESIGN Robotic and open pancreatectomy for stages I-III PDAC were obtained from the 2010 to 2016 National Cancer Database. RESULTS We identified 17 831 pancreaticoduodenectomies and 2718 distal pancreatectomies of which 626 (4%) and 332 (12%) were robotic, respectively. There was no difference in median overall survival between RPD (22.0 months) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (21.8 months; logrank P = .755). The adjusted hazard ratio [HR] was 1.014 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.903-1.139). The median overall survival for RDP (35.3 months) was higher than open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) (24.9 months; logrank P = .001). The adjusted HR suggests a benefit to RDP compared to ODP (HR, 0.744; 95% CI: 0.632-0.868) CONCLUSION: In a national cohort of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the robotic platform was associated with similar long-term survival for pancreaticoduodenectomy, but improved survival for distal pancreatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sharon B Winters
- UPMC Network Cancer Registry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard Hoehn
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samer Tohme
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mohamed A Adam
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David L Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zeh HJ, Bahary N, Boone BA, Singhi AD, Miller-Ocuin JL, Normolle DP, Zureikat AH, Hogg ME, Bartlett DL, Lee KK, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Murthy P, Tang D, Seiser N, Amaravadi RK, Espina V, Liotta L, Lotze MT. A Randomized Phase II Preoperative Study of Autophagy Inhibition with High-Dose Hydroxychloroquine and Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel in Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:3126-3134. [PMID: 32156749 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-4042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We hypothesized that autophagy inhibition would increase response to chemotherapy in the preoperative setting for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants with potentially resectable tumors were randomized to two cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (PG) alone or with hydroxychloroquine (PGH), followed by resection. The primary endpoint was histopathologic response in the resected specimen. Secondary clinical endpoints included serum CA 19-9 biomarker response and margin negative R0 resection. Exploratory endpoints included markers of autophagy, immune infiltrate, and serum cytokines. RESULTS Thirty-four patients in the PGH arm and 30 in the PG arm were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The PGH arm demonstrated statistically improved Evans grade histopathologic responses (P = 0.00016), compared with control. In patients with elevated CA 19-9, a return to normal was associated with improved overall and recurrence-free survival (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in serious adverse events between arms and chemotherapy dose number was equivalent. The PGH arm had greater evidence of autophagy inhibition in their resected specimens (increased SQSTM1, P = 0.027, as well as increased immune cell tumor infiltration, P = 0.033). Overall survival (P = 0.59) and relapse-free survival (P = 0.55) did not differ between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS The addition of hydroxychloroquine to preoperative gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma resulted in greater pathologic tumor response, improved serum biomarker response, and evidence of autophagy inhibition and immune activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Brian A Boone
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Daniel P Normolle
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David L Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Allan Tsung
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - J Wallis Marsh
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Pranav Murthy
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Daolin Tang
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Natalie Seiser
- HPB and Transplant Institute at St. Vincent's Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ravi K Amaravadi
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Virginia Espina
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia
| | - Lance Liotta
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia
| | - Michael T Lotze
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chopra A, Hodges JC, Olson A, Burton SA, Lee KK, Bahary N, Singhi AD, Boone BA, Lotze MT, Hogg ME, Zeh H, Zureikat AH. Outcomes and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy in localized pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
727 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used for pancreatic cancer (PDA). The comparative efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) versus chemoradiation (NCRT) remains uncertain. We aimed to compare NC and NCRT on survival outcomes and pathologic endpoints of PDA. Methods: Single-center analysis of PDAs treated with NC or NCRT between 2008-2018. Average treatment effects (ATE) were estimated after matching cases to controls using Mahalanobis distance nearest-neighbor matching. Competing risk survival analysis and inverse probability weighted estimates (IPWE) were used for disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) respectively. Results: Of 418 patients (median age 67yrs, 51% females), 327 received NC and 91 received NCRT. NCRT patients had more locally advanced disease, cross-over NC regimens (gemcitabine & 5-FU based), longer neoadjuvant therapy duration, open surgery and vascular resection (all p < 0.05). NCRT was associated with lower LN positivity, LNR, LVI and PNI, higher R0 rates, and higher near complete and complete pathologic responses (all p < 0.05, table). After adjustment, NCRT was associated with a significant reduction in LN positivity [95%CI = (-)0.41-(-)0.07; p = 0.007] and LVI [95%CI = (-)0.36-(-)0.03; p = 0.02]. While NCRT was associated with improved OS on UVA (25.5 vs. 21.6 months; p = 0.04), it was not significantly associated with OS by IPWE after adjusting for adjuvant therapy [95%CI = (-)5.02-16.3; p = 0.3] or DFS on competing risk analysis (95%CI = 0.78-1.31; p = 0.96). Conclusions: Although NCRT is associated with improved pathologic surrogates, it is not associated with improved survival in PDA. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmita Chopra
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Adam Olson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Steven A. Burton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kenneth K. Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Brian A. Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | | | | | - Herbert Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bularga A, Anand A, Strachan FE, Lee KK, Stewart S, Ferry AV, Chapman AR, Marshall L, Shah ASV, Newby DE, Mills NL. 247Safety and efficacy of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for risk stratification in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Guidelines acknowledge the emerging role of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays for the risk stratification and rapid rule-out of myocardial infarction, but multiple approaches have been described. We previously demonstrated the utility of a single hs-cTnI concentration <5 ng/L at presentation to risk stratify patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Purpose
To assess the safety and efficacy of a hs-cTnI concentration <5 ng/L at presentation in consecutive patients included in the High-STEACS (High-SensitivityTroponin in the Evaluation of patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome) randomised controlled trial.
Methods
The High-STEACS trial was a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial in ten hospitals across Scotland that included 48,282 patients in whom high-sensitivity cardiac troponin was requested by the attending clinician for evaluation of suspected ACS. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were excluded. We evaluated the negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity of a presentation hs-cTnI <5 ng/L for a composite outcome of type 1 myocardial infarction, or subsequent type 1 myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. To assess safety, we report the one-year risk of type 1 myocardial infarction or cardiac death. To assess efficacy, we report the proportion of patients with cardiac troponin <5 ng/L at presentation.
Results
We included 47,101 consecutive patients in the analysis (mean 61±17 years old, 47% female). Of these patients, 27,500 (58%) had a cardiac troponin <5 ng/L at presentation. Overall, 4,313/47,101 (9%) patients had a composite outcome at 30 days, but the event rate was only 0.4% in those with troponin <5 ng/L (98/27,500). The NPV for the composite outcome in those <5 ng/L was 99.7% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 99.6–99.7) and the sensitivity was 98.0% (95% CI 97.6–98.4). In those without evidence of myocardial injury at presentation (hs-cTnI <99thcentile), type 1 myocardial infarction or cardiac death at one year occurred in 197 (0.7%) patients with cardiac troponin <5 ng/L, compared to 647 (5.5%) of those ≥5 ng/L. The NPV was unchanged across all age groups, although efficacy fell as fewer older patients had hs-cTnI concentrations below the risk stratification threshold (see Figure).
Conclusion
A hs-cTnI concentration <5 ng/L at presentation identifies the majority of patients with suspected ACS as low-risk of early or late cardiac events. Although the proportion identified as low risk is reduced in older populations, the safety of this risk stratification approach is maintained across patients of all ages.
Acknowledgement/Funding
British Heart Foundation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bularga
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - F E Strachan
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - S Stewart
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A V Ferry
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A R Chapman
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - L Marshall
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A S V Shah
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D E Newby
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shah A, McAllister D, Astengo F, Perez J, Lee KK, Gallacher P, Hall J, Bing R, Anand A, Newby D, Mills N, Cruden N. 3325Incidence, outcomes and microbiology in patients with infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Despite recent improvements in management, infective endocarditis remains associated with high morbidity and mortality. Over the last few decades, several factors have impacted on both the incidence and outcomes following infective endocarditis.
Purpose
Using a national linkage approach, we describe the changing age- and sex-stratified incidence and outcomes of infective endocarditis in Scotland over the last 25 years.
Methods
We conducted a consecutive retrospective individual patient linkage study across multiple national databases. Using data extracted from the Scottish hospital discharge dataset held by the Information Services Division of NHS National Services Scotland, we extracted episodes for all patients aged 20 years or older who were admitted with infective endocarditis between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2014 in Scotland, UK. Patient episodes with infective endocarditis were linked to national prescribing and microbiology databases. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality following the index presentation. Generalised additive models were constructed to estimate the crude and age- and sex-stratified incidence rates (using a poison distribution) as well as trends in mortality (using a binomial distribution) adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity.
Results
Across 12,446 individual patients, there were a total of 12,667 hospitalisations (mean age 68±17 years, 55% females) with infective endocarditis using a 5-year look back period. The estimated crude rate of hospitalisation increased from 7.38 per 100,000 (95% CI 6.58 to 8.28) in 1990 to 15.09 per 100,000 (95% CI 13.90 to 16.39) in 2014 (p<0.001). Over the period of the study, 31% (3,877/12,667) of people admitted to hospital with infective endocarditis died within one year of admission. Case fatality fell markedly in both men and women from 1990 to 2014 (Figure). Microbiology was status was available for 34% of all hospitalisations with staphylococcus cultures associated with worse outcomes.
Conclusions
Despite the crude incidence of infective endocarditis doubling over the last 25 years and case fatality remaining high, the risk of death has markedly fallen over the last two decades. Staphylococcus cultures remain an independent marker of poor prognosis in this cohort.
Acknowledgement/Funding
British Heart Foundation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Shah
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - F Astengo
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - J Perez
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - P Gallacher
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - J Hall
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - R Bing
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D Newby
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N Mills
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N Cruden
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gallacher PJ, Miller-Hodges E, Shah A, Anand A, Lee KK, Chapman AR, Farrah T, Halbesma N, Blackmur J, Newby DE, Mills NL, Dhaun N. P1578Outcomes in patients with renal impairment and myocardial injury or infarction identified by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing: a secondary analysis of the High-STEACS trial. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patients with renal impairment are at increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI), but the interpretation of cardiac troponin is challenging in this setting. The use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays increases the detection of myocardial injury, yet may contribute to uncertainty in the diagnosis of MI in those with renal impairment.
Purpose
To describe the diagnosis and outcomes of patients with myocardial injury or infarction identified using a hs-cTnI assay, stratified by renal function.
Methods
In a pre-specified secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial, we identified consecutive patients with a hs-cTnI concentration greater than the sex-specific 99th centile between June 2013 and March 2016. The diagnoses of type 1 or type 2 MI were adjudicated and classified according to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Renal impairment was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73m2.The primary outcome of type 1 or type 4b MI or cardiovascular death was compared in patients with and without renal impairment at 1 year.
Results
A measure of renal function was available in 47,334 (98.0%) patients, of whom 7,933 (16.8%) had renal impairment (mean age 76±12 years; 54% female). Plasma hs-cTnI concentrations were >99th centile in 47.9% (3,800/7,933) of patients with renal impairment and 16.3% (6,439/39,401) of patients with normal renal function. In those with and without renal impairment, the adjudicated diagnosis was type 1 MI in 35.2% (1,336/3,800) and 55.8% (3,596/6,439) of patients, and type 2 MI in 12.6% (480/3,800) and 9.7% (626/6,439) of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for both). In patients with hs-cTnI concentrations >99th centile, the primary outcome occurred in 24.9% (945/3,800) of patients with renal impairment, compared to 12.1% (779/6,439) of patients with normal renal function (P<0.001). In patients with type 1 MI, the primary outcome occurred in 32.6% (436/1,336) of those with renal impairment and 11.7% (419/3,596) of those without (P<0.001). In patients with type 2 MI, the primary outcome occurred in 20.4% (98/480) and 9.9% (62/626) of patients with and without renal impairment, respectively (P<0.001).
Conclusion
Almost half of all patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and renal impairment have hs-cTnI concentrations greater than the sex-specific 99th centile. Whilst only one in three had a diagnosis of type 1 MI, an elevated troponin concentration was associated with a poorer prognosis in those with concomitant renal impairment compared to those without, irrespective of the index diagnosis.
Acknowledgement/Funding
British Heart Foundation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Gallacher
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - E Miller-Hodges
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Department of Renal Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Shah
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A R Chapman
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - T Farrah
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Department of Renal Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N Halbesma
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - J Blackmur
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D E Newby
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N Dhaun
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Department of Renal Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lee KK, Ferry AV, Anand A, Strachan FE, Chapman AR, Newby DB, Tuck C, Keerie C, Weir CJ, Shah ASV, Mills NL. P1731High-sensitivity troponin with sex-specific thresholds in suspected acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Introduction
Major disparities between women and men in the diagnosis, management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome are well recognised. Whether sex-specific diagnostic thresholds for myocardial infarction will address these differences is uncertain.
Purpose
To evaluate the impact of implementing a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay with sex-specific diagnostic thresholds for myocardial infarction in women and men with suspected acute coronary syndrome.
Methods
In a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial across ten hospitals we evaluated the implementation of a hs-cTnI assay in 48,282 (47% women) consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. During a validation phase the hs-cTnI assay results were suppressed and a contemporary cTnI assay with a single threshold was used to guide care. Myocardial injury was defined as any hs-cTnI concentration >99th centile of 16 ng/L in women and 34 ng/L in men. The primary outcome was myocardial infarction after the initial presentation or cardiovascular death at 1 year. In this prespecified analysis, we evaluated outcomes in men and women before and after implementation of the hs-cTnI assay.
Results
Use of the hs-cTnI assay with sex-specific thresholds increased myocardial injury in women by 42% (from 3,521 (16%) to 4,991 (22%)) and by 6% in men (from 5,068 (20%) to 5,369 (21%)). Whilst treatment increased in both sexes, women with myocardial injury remained less likely than men to undergo coronary revascularisation (15% versus34%), or to receive dual anti-platelet (26% versus43%), statin (16% versus26%) or other preventative therapies (P<0.001 for all). The primary outcome occurred in 18% (369/2,072) and 17% (488/2,919) of women with myocardial injury during the validation and implementation phase respectively (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.33), compared to 18% (370/2,044) and 15% (513/3,325) of men (adjusted hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.01).
Patient management
Conclusion
Use of sex-specific thresholds identified five-times more additional women than men with myocardial injury, such that the proportion of women and men with myocardial injury is now similar. Despite this increase, women received approximately half the number of treatments for coronary artery disease as men and their outcomes were not improved.
Acknowledgement/Funding
The British Heart Foundation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A V Ferry
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - F E Strachan
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A R Chapman
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D B Newby
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - C Tuck
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - C Keerie
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - C J Weir
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A S V Shah
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Anand A, Shah ASV, Strachan FE, Lee KK, Chapman AR, Bularga A, Stewart S, Ferry A, Marshall L, Newby DE, Mills NL. P3593Improving the performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) mandates a rise and/or fall in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) concentration with at least one measure above the 99th centile of a healthy reference population. However, the 99th centile varies by age, sex, and prevalence of comorbid disease within reference populations, and the application of a single threshold may create diagnostic uncertainty in unselected patients attending the Emergency Department.
Purpose
To compare performance of hs-cTnI at the 99th centile with a model that includes additional clinical variables, for the diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction.
Methods
The High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (High-STEACS trial) was a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of 48,282 consecutive patients across 10 hospitals in Scotland. We evaluated the positive predictive value (PPV) of a hs-cTnI >99th centile for a diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were excluded, and all were adjudicated according to the 4th UDMI. The study population was randomly divided into derivation (80%) and internal validation (20%) cohorts. Using generalised additive modelling, we tested the effect of adding clinically relevant variables to hs-cTnI for the prediction of type 1 myocardial infarction in the derivation cohort, and assessed performance of the final model in the validation cohort.
Results
We included 47,101 consecutive patients (61±17 years, 47% female), of whom 9,057 (19%) had at least one hs-cTnI >99th centile (7,207 in derivation and 1,850 in validation cohorts). There were 4,087 (45%) patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, with 3239 (45%) and 848 (46%) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Across the study population, PPV for type 1 myocardial infarction reduced markedly with increasing age (Figure). Age, sex, chest pain, ischaemia on the electrocardiogram, creatinine and rate of change of hs-cTnI were included in the model. Comorbidities (ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, stroke and hyperlipidaemia) did not improve model performance. In the validation cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) for type 1 myocardial infarction using the 99th centile alone was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70–0.74), whereas the AUC for the optimised model was 0.84 (95% CI 0.82–0.85) (p<0.001 by DeLong's test for difference, see Figure).
Figure 1
Conclusion
The diagnostic performance of the 99th centile for type 1 myocardial infarction is poor, particularly in older populations. A simple model including readily available clinical features improves diagnostic performance and with further external validation could support more individualised treatment decisions.
Acknowledgement/Funding
British Heart Foundation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A S V Shah
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - F E Strachan
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A R Chapman
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Bularga
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - S Stewart
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Ferry
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - L Marshall
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D E Newby
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chapman AR, Adamson PD, Anand A, Shah ASV, Lee KK, Strachan FE, Ferry ASV, Sandeman DE, Berry C, Gray AJ, Tuck C, Fox KAA, Newby DE, Weir C, Mills NL. 249High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the universal definition of myocardial infarction: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction recommends the 99th centile diagnostic threshold using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assay and the classification of patients by the etiology of myocardial injury. Whether implementation of this definition improves risk stratification, treatment or outcomes is unknown.
Methods
In a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial, we implemented a high-sensitivity troponin assay and the recommendations of the Universal Definition in 48,282 consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome across ten hospitals. In a pre-specified secondary analysis, we compared the primary outcome of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death, and secondary outcome of non-cardiovascular death at one year across diagnostic categories as per the Fourth Universal Definition. We applied competing risks methodology in all analyses, using a cumulative incidence function and determining the cause-specific hazard ratio (csHR) for competing outcomes.
Results
Cardiac troponin concentrations were elevated in 21.5% (10,360/48,282) of all trial participants. Implementation increased the diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction by 11% (510/4,471), type 2 myocardial infarction by 22% (205/916), acute myocardial injury by 36% (443/1,233) and chronic myocardial injury by 43% (389/898). The risk and rate of the primary outcome was highest in those with type 1 myocardial infarction, whereas the risk and rate of non-cardiovascular death was highest in those with acute myocardial injury (Table, Figure). Despite increases in anti-platelet therapy and coronary revascularization after implementation, the primary outcome was unchanged in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction (csHR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.21), or in any other category.
Adjusted csHR for competing outcomes Myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death Non-cardiovascular death Adjusted csHR (95% CI) Adjusted csHR (95% CI) Type 1 myocardial infarction 5.64 (5.12 to 6.22) 0.83 (0.72 to 0.96) Type 2 myocardial infarction 3.50 (2.94 to 4.15) 1.72 (1.44 to 2.06) Acute myocardial injury 4.38 (3.80 to 5.05) 2.65 (2.33 to 3.00) Chronic myocardial injury 3.88 (3.31 to 4.55) 2.06 (1.77 to 2.40) Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, season, days since trial onset and site of recruitment (as a random effect).
Cumulative incidence and number at risk
Conclusions
Implementation of the recommendations of the Universal Definition identified patients with different risks of future cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular events, but did not improve outcomes. Greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms and effective strategies for the investigation and treatment of patients with myocardial injury and infarction are required if we are to improve outcomes.
Acknowledgement/Funding
British Heart Foundation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Chapman
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - P D Adamson
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Anand
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A S V Shah
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - K K Lee
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - F E Strachan
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A S V Ferry
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D E Sandeman
- Victoria Hospital, Cardiology, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom
| | - C Berry
- Cardiovascular Research Centre of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - A J Gray
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Department of Emergency Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - C Tuck
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - K A A Fox
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D E Newby
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - C Weir
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N L Mills
- University of Edinburgh, BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Tan K, Chow WS, Leung J, Ho A, Ozaki R, Kam G, Li J, Choi CH, Tsang MW, Chan N, Lee KK, Chan KW. Clinical considerations when adding a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor to insulin therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus. Hong Kong Med J 2019; 25:312-319. [PMID: 31416990 DOI: 10.12809/hkmj197802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- K Tan
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - W S Chow
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - J Leung
- Department of Integrated Medical Service, Ruttonjee and Tang Shiu Kin Hospitals, Hong Kong
| | - A Ho
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong
| | - R Ozaki
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - G Kam
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
| | - J Li
- Department of Medicine, Yan Chai Hospital, Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong
| | - C H Choi
- Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Jordan, Hong Kong
| | - M W Tsang
- Specialist in Endocrinology, Private Practice
| | - N Chan
- Specialist in Endocrinology, Private Practice
| | - K K Lee
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - K W Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Laichikok, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|