Real-world effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide in adults with type 2 diabetes: An international, multicentre, 12-month, prospective observational study

AIM

To assess the impact of insulin glargine (100 U/mL) and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) fixed-ratio combination therapy on the overall management of glycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), previously inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs ± basal insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This 12-month, international, multicentre, prospective, observational study included patients (age ≥ 18 years) with T2D who had initiated iGlarLixi within 1 month prior to study inclusion. Data were collected at study inclusion, month 3, month 6 and month 12 from patient diaries, self-measured plasma glucose, and questionnaires. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to month 6.

RESULTS

Of the 737 eligible participants (mean age: 57.8 [standard deviation: 11.2] years; male: 49%), 685 had baseline and post-baseline HbA1c data available. The least squares mean change in HbA1c from baseline to month 6 was -1.4% (standard error [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.05 [-1.5, -1.3]). The absolute change from baseline at month 12 was -1.7% ± 1.9% (95% CI: -1.9, -1.5). There were 72 hypoglycaemia events reported during the study period, with a very low incidence of severe hypoglycaemia (two participants [rate: 0.003 events per patient-year]).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world observational study shows that initiation of iGlarLixi in people with T2D inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs ± basal insulin or GLP-1 RAs improves glycaemic control with a low incidence of hypoglycaemia.

Safety and effectiveness of iGlarLixi in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Gulf countries during Ramadan holy month: A subgroup analysis of the SoliRam observational study

AIM

To investigate safety and effectiveness of iGlarLixi in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) observing fast during Ramadan from Gulf countries.

METHODS

This planned subgroup analysis of the SoliRam - a multinational, prospective, non-interventional, real-world, observational study - focused on participants from Gulf countries. Primary endpoint was proportion of participants experiencing ≥1 episode of severe and/or symptomatic documented (<70 mg/dL [<3.9 mmol/L]) hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

A total of 241 individuals with T2DM (mean age: 58.1 years; male: 54.4%; mean duration of diabetes: 13.3 years) were included. All 234 eligible participants followed during Ramadan were able to fast for ≥25 days and no participants broke fast due to hypoglycemia. Primary endpoint was reported in one participant (0.5%) during fasting hours during Ramadan. Improvements (mean ± SD change) in HbA1c (-1.0 ± 1.0% [-11 ± 10 mmol/mol]), FPG (-22.5 ± 29.7 mg/dL), and body weight (-1.5 ± 2.0 kg) were observed from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan. Three participants (1.2 %) reported an adverse event (AE) of any cause and one (0.4%) reported a gastrointestinal AE.

CONCLUSIONS

iGlarLixi is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in people with T2DM from Gulf countries, including during Ramadan fasting, and is associated with low risk of hypoglycemia.

Findings for iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30 confirmed in groups of people with type 2 diabetes with different biomedical characteristics

AIM

To report prespecified and post hoc analyses of the SoliMix dataset exploring the impact of baseline participant characteristics on the original SoliMix study outcomes, to enable informed treatment choices for people with different biomedical characteristics.

METHODS

SoliMix (EudraCT 2017-003370-13) compared once-daily iGlarLixi (a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide) with twice-daily BIAsp 30 (30% insulin aspart and 70% insulin aspart protamine). In this analysis, the original primary outcomes of noninferiority of iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30 in terms of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change and superiority in terms of body weight change, together with change in basal insulin dose and hypoglycaemia outcomes, were investigated by baseline age, duration of diabetes, insulin dose, HbA1c level, body mass index (BMI), and renal function.

RESULTS

No evidence of difference in comparative treatment effect was detected across baseline age, duration of diabetes, insulin dose, HbA1c level, BMI and renal function subgroups for any endpoint (all heterogeneity P > 0.05), except American Diabetes Association Level 2 hypoglycaemia event rate when stratified by insulin dose (P = 0.011), which may be a chance difference given multiple testing and the small numbers of Level 2 events.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment effects of iGlarLixi were consistent irrespective of baseline HbA1c, insulin dose, BMI, age, duration of diabetes and renal function, supporting the use of iGlarLixi as an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option in people with type 2 diabetes with a wide range of biomedical characteristics.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of iGlarLixi in people with type 2 diabetes who fast during Ramadan: The SoliRam observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of iGlarLixi in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) fasting during Ramadan.

METHODS

SoliRam was a multinational, prospective, single-arm, real-world observational study conducted during Ramadan 2020 and 2021 in adults with T2D treated with iGlarLixi ≥3 months at study entry. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants experiencing ≥1 episode of severe and/or symptomatic documented hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL [<3.9 mmol/L]).

RESULTS

Among the 409 eligible participants followed during Ramadan, 96.8% fasted for ≥25 days and 92.4% did not break fasting during Ramadan. Four participants broke their fast due to hypoglycemia. Minimal adjustments were seen in antihyperglycemic therapies from pre to during Ramadan. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was experienced by 1.0%, 2.3%, and 0.3% of participants, respectively, during the last month of pre-Ramadan, Ramadan, and first month post-Ramadan. Mean change in HbA_1c from pre-to post-Ramadan periods was -0.75% (-8.2 mmol/mol), and participants with HbA_1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) increased from 7.9% pre-Ramadan to 28.6% post-Ramadan.

CONCLUSIONS

iGlarLixi is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for people with T2D, including those who intend to fast during Ramadan, and is associated with a low risk of hypoglycemia; benefits were observed both during and after Ramadan.

iGlarLixi versus basal plus Rapid-Acting insulin in adults with type 2 diabetes advancing from basal insulin therapy: The SoliSimplify Real-World study

AIM

For people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on basal insulin (BI), guidelines recommend several treatment advancement options. This study compared the clinical effectiveness of once-daily iGlarLixi versus a multiple-injection BI + rapid acting insulin (RAI) regimen in adults with T2D advancing from BI therapy in real-world clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic medical records from the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) database were analysed retrospectively using propensity score matching to compare therapy advancement with iGlarLixi or BI + RAI in US adults ≥18 years with T2D on BI who had ≥1 valid glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up. The primary objective was non-inferiority of iGlarLixi to BI + RAI in HbA1c change from baseline to 6 months (margin 0.3%).

RESULTS

Propensity score matching generated cohorts with balanced baseline characteristics (N = 814 in each group). HbA1c reduction from baseline to 6 months with iGlarLixi was non-inferior to BI + RAI [mean difference (95% confidence interval): 0.1 (-0.1, 0.2)%; one-sided p = .0032]. At 6 months, weight gain was significantly lower with iGlarLixi than with BI + RAI [-0.8 (-1.3, -0.2) kg; two-sided p = .0069]. Achievement of HbA1c <7% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain were similar between groups [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.15 (0.81, 1.63); p = .4280]. Hypoglycaemia was low in both groups, probably because of underreporting.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world clinical practice, glycaemic outcomes 6 months after treatment advancement from BI are similar for people with T2D using iGlarLixi versus BI + RAI, with iGlarLixi leading to less weight gain.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of iGlarLixi in People With Type 2 Diabetes who Fast During Ramadan: Results From Wave 1 of the SOLIRAM Study

Background: People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at an increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia when fasting. SOLIRAM is an international, prospective, observational study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the fixed-ratio combination (FRC) of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in people with T2D who fast during Ramadan. Methods: SOLIRAM will be performed in two waves. Here, we present the interim results, using descriptive statistics, from participants who fasted during Ramadan in 2020 (Wave 1). Adults with T2D who had taken iGlarLixi for ≥3 months before inclusion and who planned to fast for ≥15 days during Ramadan, were enrolled from 5 countries. During the study, iGlarLixi treatment was adjusted as per routine practice by the treating physician. Results: Overall, 155 people with T2D (54.2% male) were eligible. Mean±SD age was 58.4±9.5 years, body mass index was 30.5±6.0 kg/m² and 64.5% of people had ≥1 diabetes-related complications. Proportion of patients with ≥1 macro- and microvascular complications were 11.0% and 48.4%, respectively. Mean±SD duration of diabetes was 14.0±6.6 years and duration of iGlarLixi treatment prior to study participation was 5.7±3.3 months. Mean±SD length of fasting was 28.7±3.3 days and only 9/153 people (5.9%) broke the fast during Ramadan. Reported reasons for breaking the fast were travel, pre-existing conditions, adverse events (AEs; not related to iGlarLixi), hypoglycaemia, and menses. Change in antihyperglycaemic treatment class was minimal during the study with 79.4% and 54.2% of people taking biguanides and sulfonylureas during Ramadan, respectively. The mean±SD iGlarLixi dose changed from 24.8±11.6 U (pre-Ramadan) to 23.8±10.5 U (Ramadan period) and 24.9±11.6 U (post-Ramadan). During Ramadan, 137/153 (89.5%) and 11/153 (7.2%) of people took iGlarLixi at Iftar (evening) and before Suhur (morning), respectively. The number of participants reporting ≥1 severe and/or symptomatic documented hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose [PG] ≤70 mg/dL; primary endpoint) was 2/151 (1.3%) during pre-Ramadan, 3/148 (2.0%) during Ramadan, and none during post-Ramadan. No participant reported hypoglycaemia with PG &lt;54 mg/dL and there were no severe or serious hypoglycaemia events. The rate of severe and/or symptomatic documented hypoglycaemia (PG ≤70 mg/dL) was 0.02 per patient-month. Improvements were observed for mean±SD HbA1c and fasting PG (pre-Ramadan, 8.4±1.1% and 146.9±32.1 mg/dL to post-Ramadan, 7.5±0.8% and 122.5±28.8 mg/dL) with an average reduction of -0.8±1.1% and -24.4±32.6 mg/dL, respectively. AEs were low (5.8%) and were not considered related to iGlarLixi, and there were no serious AEs. Conclusion: In a real-world setting, people with T2D treated with FRC iGlarLixi were able to fast for most of the month of Ramadan; the incidence of hypoglycaemia was low and glycaemic control was improved.

Glycemic Control and Prevention of Diabetic Complications in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Expert Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Trends on glycemic control and diabetes complications are known for high-income countries, but comprehensive data from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are lacking.

METHODS

This is an expert opinion based on two retrospective studies. Here we examine the recent subset analysis of relevant data from the IDMPS Wave 7 (International Diabetes Management-Practices Study, 2015-2016) and the GOAL study conducted in multiple LMICs.

RESULTS

Wave 7 sub-analysis was performed in 6113 people with type 2 diabetes from 24 LMIC. Poorly controlled diabetes (hemogloblin A1c [HbA1c] ≥ 7%) was found in 58.6, 73.0 and 78.3% of participants with diabetes duration of < 5, 5-12 and > 12 years, respectively (in association with a high prevalence of macro- and microvascular complications). Moreover, 37.7% of participants with diabetes duration of 5-12 years were treated only with oral antihyperglycemic drugs. The GOAL study investigated the efficacy of insulin in 2704 poorly controlled participants (mean HbA1c 9.7%; diabetes duration 10.1 ± 6.7 years; 10 LMIC). A significant 2% reduction in mean HbA1c levels was observed after 12 months of treatment. Only 7.2% of participants experienced a symptomatic episode of hypoglycemia (nocturnal or severe hypoglycemia events were infrequent).

CONCLUSION

The rate of well-controlled participants (HbA1c < 7.0%) in the Wave 7 sub-analysis was lower than that observed in the USA (NHANES survey) or in European countries (GUIDANCE study), and the incidence of microvascular complications was higher. The GOAL study showed that insulin treatment improves glycemic control and reduces this gap. The Expert Panel recommends intensifying diabetes treatment as soon as possible, as well as patients' education and other preventive measures, initiatives which require modest costs compared to hospitalization and treatment of diabetes complications.

Safety of lixisenatide plus basal insulin treatment regimen in Indian people with type 2 diabetes mellitus during Ramadan fast: A post hoc analysis of the LixiRam randomized trial

AIMS

Hypoglycemia is one of the most important complications associated with Ramadan fasting in people with type 2 diabetes. LixiRam (NCT02941367) was the first randomized trial comparing safety and efficacy of lixisenatide + basal insulin (BI) vs. sulphonylurea + BI in people with type 2 diabetes who fast during Ramadan. This post hoc analysis focuses on the LixiRam study population from India.

METHODS

Adults with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with sulphonylurea + BI ± another oral anti-hyperglycemic drug were randomized 1:1 to receive lixisenatide + BI or to continue sulphonylurea + BI treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 150 participants were randomized in India. One participant (1.3%) with lixisenatide + BI vs. 5 participants (6.8%) with sulphonylurea + BI experienced ≥1 documented symptomatic hypoglycemic event during the Ramadan fast (odds ratio [OR]: 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-1.93). Incidence of any hypoglycemia was numerically lower with lixisenatide + BI vs. sulphonylurea + BI during Ramadan fasting (1.3% [1/75] vs. 14.7% [11/75], respectively; OR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01-0.69). No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of lixisenatide prandial GLP1-RA + BI may be a suitable treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes who elect to fast during Ramadan. Clinical Trial Registry: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02941367).

The characteristics and pattern of care for the type 2 diabetes mellitus population in the MENA region during Ramadan: An international prospective study (DAR-MENA T2DM)

AIMS

We aimed to describe the characteristics and care of participants with diabetes during Ramadan in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, we analysed the number of fasted days, number of participants fasting, glycemic control, rate of hypoglycemic events, and lifestyle patterns for participants with T2DM during Ramadan 2016.

RESULTS

The population included 1749 participants with T2DM. The mean (SD) duration of fasting was 27.7 (5.0) days, and 57.3% of participants fasted for the full duration of Ramadan. Following Ramadan, a significant improvement in HbA1c, FPG, and PPG was observed (p < 0.0001). Confirmed hypoglycemia increased significantly from before to during Ramadan (incidence: 4.9% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001; adverse events: 0.11 vs. 0.22 events/month/participant, p < 0.001) and was dependent on the treatment regimen. Severe hypoglycemia incidence was 0.2% before versus 0.9% during Ramadan (p = 0.031), whereas adverse events remained comparable (0.01 events/month/participant; p = 0.154). Most participants (97.4%) reported lifestyle changes during Ramadan.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study is the first to describe the characteristics and care of participants with T2DM during Ramadan in MENA, and can be utilized in the development of evidence-based care to ensure the safety of participants who fast.

Safety of lixisenatide versus sulfonylurea added to basal insulin treatment in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus who elect to fast during Ramadan (LixiRam): An international, randomized, open-label trial

AIMS

Adding lixisenatide to basal insulin (BI) instead of sulfonylurea (SU), versus continuing SU + BI was assessed in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who intended to fast during Ramadan 2017.

METHODS

LixiRam (NCT02941367) was a phase 4, randomized, open-label, 12-22-week study in people with T2DM insufficiently controlled with SU + BI ± 1 oral anti-diabetic. Endpoints included the percentage of participants with ≥1 documented symptomatic hypoglycemia event (plasma glucose ≤70 mg/dL; primary endpoint) and any hypoglycemia during Ramadan fasting.

RESULTS

A numerically lower percentage of participants with lixisenatide + BI (3.3%, 3/91) versus SU + BI (8.9%, 8/90) had ≥1 documented symptomatic hypoglycemia event (intent-to-treat visit 4) during Ramadan fasting (OR: 0.34; 95% CI 0.09, 1.35; proportion difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.13, 0.01); the difference was statistically significant for the 'any hypoglycemia' category (lixisenatide + BI: 4.3%, 4/92; SU + BI: 17.4%, 16/92; OR: 0.22; 95% CI 0.07, 0.68; proportion difference -0.13, 95% CI -0.22, -0.04; intent-to-treat). No new treatment-emergent adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SU + BI, lixisenatide + BI provided lower rates of any hypoglycemia in people with T2DM during Ramadan fasting. Lixisenatide + BI therapy may be a suitable treatment option during fasting.

GOAL study: clinical and non-clinical predictive factors for achieving glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes in real clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes guidelines recommend to individualize treatment targets/strategies in inadequately controlled patients by lifestyle management and glucose-lowering drugs to decrease the burden of diabetes-related complications. This real-world practice study aimed to assess predictive factors for achieving the glycemic hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 6 months as targeted by the treating physician in adults with type 2 diabetes who required initiation of basal insulin, initiation of bolus insulin, or modification from basal or premixed insulin to new insulin regimen containing insulin glargine and/or insulin glulisine.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an international, multicenter, observational survey with 12-month follow-up time in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled conducted in 10 developing countries.

RESULTS

Overall, 2704 patients (mean age: 54.6 years, body mass index: 28.7 kg/m²; Caucasian: 46.1%, type 2 diabetes duration: 10.1 years) with poor glycemic control (mean HbA1c: 9.7% (83 mmol/mol), fasting blood glucose: 196.8 mg/dL) were eligible. At 6 months, advanced age, Caucasian ethnicity, shorter type 2 diabetes duration (>10 vs 1 year, p<0.0001), lower baseline HbA1c (≥ 8.5% vs <7%, p<0.0001) and no intake of oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) (none vs 2, p=0.02) were predictive factors for achieving glycemic goal as targeted by the treating physician. Absolute changes in the mean HbA1c of -1.7% and -2% were observed from baseline to 6 and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with some well-known predictive factors, this study suggested that early insulin regimen treatment initiation and/or intensification allowed patients to promote glycemic control.

[Knowledge of hypertension among hypertensive patients in general practice, and its relation to achieving therapeutic goals: The Co-HACT study, French West Indies]

OBJECTIVES

Appraisal of the agreement between patients' reports and general practitionners' declaration in a French Caribbean population and relationship with blood pressure normalization.

METHODS

One hundred French Caribbean practitioners participated in this observational survey: each of them included five essential hypertensives treated for more than three months. BP was considered to be normalized if inferior to 140/90 mmHg. We considered that there is a total agreement between patient and GP declaration when SBP and DBP did not differ by more than 5 mmHg and when the eight risk factors or co-morbidity were identical. Identification of independent factors of BP normalization and awareness was performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Five hundred and nine hypertensives (57% women) were recruited. Sixty-nine percent (n = 328) were less than 65 years, 75% (n = 341) had an educational level less than high school. The normalisation rate was 39% (n = 185) within the whole population. 63.4% had a high cardiovascular risk. BP normalization appeared to be closely associated to BP awareness.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational survey, in a French Caribbean hypertensive population, two third had a high cardiovascular risk. The normalization rate was 39%. This BP normalization appeared to be closely associated to BP awareness.

What is the schizophrenic patients' level of information about their disease and their treatment?

Improved compliance with antipsychotic medication is a major issue in schizophrenic management. For this purpose educational programs have been used, but up to now, little or no information has been gathered or published in France concerning schizophrenic patients' opinion on information they have about their disease and their treatment. Thus we conducted a survey in concert with 78 psychiatrists from the French psychiatric health service. From this cross sectional survey we assessed 336 outpatients (male: 72%; mean age: 36 +/- 10.4 years) with schizophrenia according to the DSM IV (paranoid sub type: 57%, disorganized: 12%, catatonic: 1%, undifferentiated: 12%, residual: 18%). The mean duration of the illness was 11.6 years (sd: 8.5) and the mean duration of the follow up with the same psychiatrist was 5.4 years (sd: 5.1). Patients completed a questionnaire which assessed their level of information on mental illness and treatment. The diagnosis of schizophrenia has been told to their patients by 39% of the psychiatrists, and treatment has been explained to the patients by 96% of the practitioners. Results indicate less than half of the patients (45%) felt ill, only 46% thought they knew their illness well or very well (nevertheless only 31% of them named spontaneously the diagnosis of schizophrenia or psychosis), and 61% considered that they had been given sufficient information. Most of the patients (79%) were persuaded that their treatment was useful, and 75% of patients were completely satisfied with their treatment. Surprisingly 92% reported taking their medication regularly. Most patients think that a high level of information about their illness (74%) and treatment (79%) help them to cope better with their schizophrenia. Analysis performed according to patients characteristics indicated that paranoid patients felt more ill (p = 0.035) than others, thought to know less about their illness (p = 0.0065), and were less satisfied with their treatment (p = 0.04) and their level of information (p = 0.03). Patients with a duration of their illness longer than 10 years were more convinced of the utility of their treatment (p = 0.02) and had debated more on the choice of their treatment with their psychiatrist (p = 0.047). Patients older than 35 years were more satisfied with their information (p = 0.002). More patients with atypical antipsychotics accepted to take their treatment on a regular basis (p = 0.035) compared to patients under classical neuroleptics. This survey underlines that mental health consumers' opinions can be obtained even in the field of schizophrenia, and argues in favour of further such investigations. It also highlights the need for educational programs on schizophrenia and antipsychotic medications.

[What information do patients with schizophrenia have about their illness and treatment?]

Improved compliance with antipsychotic medication is a major issue in schizophrenic management. For this purpose educational programs have been used, but up to now, little or no information has been gathered or published in France concerning schizophrenic patients' opinion on information they have about their disease and their treatment. Thus we conducted a survey in concert with 78 psychiatrists from the French psychiatric health service. From this cross sectional survey we assessed 336 outpatients (male: 72%; mean age: 36 +/- 10.4 years) with schizophrenia according to the DSM IV (paranoid sub type: 57%, disorganized: 12%, catatonic: 1%, undifferentiated: 12%, residual: 18%). The mean duration of the illness was 11.6 years (sd: 8.5) and the mean duration of the follow up with the same psychiatrist was 5.4 years (sd: 5.1). Patients completed a questionnaire which assessed their level of information on mental illness and treatment. The diagnosis of schizophrenia has been told to their patients by 39% of the psychiatrists, and treatment has been explained to the patients by 96% of the practitioners. Results indicate less than half of the patients (45%) felt ill, only 46% thought they knew their illness well or very well (nevertheless only 31% of them named spontaneously the diagnosis of schizophrenia or psychosis), and 61% considered that they had been given sufficient information. Most of the patients (79%) were persuaded that their treatment was useful, and 75% of patient were completely satisfied with their treatment. Surprisingly 92% reported taking their medication regularly. Most patients think that a high level of information about their illness (74%) and treatment (79%) help them to cope better with their schizophrenia. Analysis performed according to patients characteristics indicated that paranoid patients felt more ill (p = 0.035) than others, thought to know less about their illness (p = 0.0065), and were less satisfied with their treatment (p = 0.04) and their level of information (p = 0.03). Patients with a duration of their illness longer than 10 years were more convinced of the utility of their treatment (p = 0.02) and had debated more on the choice of their treatment with their psychiatrist (p = 0.047). Patients older than 35 years were more satisfied with their information (p = 0.002). More patients with atypical antipsychotics accepted to take their treatment on a regular basis (p = 0.035) compared to patients under classical neuroleptics. This survey underlines that mental health consumers' opinions can be obtained even in the field of schizophrenia, and argues in favour of further such investigations. It also highlights the need for educational programs on schizophrenia and antipsychotic medications.

Nitric oxide deficiency in fenfluramine- and dexfenfluramine-induced pulmonary hypertension

Dexfenfluramine and fenfluramine greatly increase the risk of developing pulmonary hypertension (PHT). The mechanism of anorexigen-associated PHT (AA-PHT) and the reason PHT occurs in a minority of people exposed are unknown. Anorexigens are weak pulmonary vasoconstrictors, but they become potent when synthesis of the endogenous vasodilator nitric oxide (NO) is suppressed. We hypothesized NO deficiency predisposes affected individuals to develop AA-PHT. A prospective, case-control, study was performed on consecutive patients with AA-PHT (n = 9). Two sex-matched control groups were selected: patients with primary PHT (P-PHT, n = 8) and normal volunteers (n = 12). Lung NO production (VNO) and systemic plasma oxidation products of NO (NOx) were measured at rest and during exercise. AA-PHT developed 17 +/- 6 mo after a short course of anorexigen (6 +/- 2 mo) and was irreversible. VNO was lower in AA-PHT than in P-PHT and correlated inversely with PVR (p < 0.05). The apparent VNO deficiency may have resulted from increased oxidative inactivation of NO in patients with AA-PHT, as their NOx levels were elevated (p < 0.05) in inverse proportion to VNO (r2 = 0. 55; p < 0.02). In susceptible persons, anorexigens can cause an irreversible syndrome of PHT, hypoxemia, and systemic vascular complications after brief exposures. These patients have a relative NO deficiency years after discontinuing the anorexigen, perhaps explaining their original susceptibility.

[Evaluation of high amplification ECG and the study of sinus variability in the detection of patients at risk of sudden death]

In order to define the best strategy of prognostic evaluation in relation to patients in heart failure, 415 patients with impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction < 40%) were prospectively included, between June 1993 and 1996, in a study comparing the respective value of high amplification ECG and Holter analysis of sinus variability, 308 patients in sinus rhythm and narrow QRS complexes were included. The patients were distributed into 4 groups according to the presence or absence of late potentials and altered sinus variability (group I with 2 normal examinations, group II with late potentials and normal variability, group III without late potentials, but with altered variability and group IV with 2 abnormal examinations). The sudden and overall mortality was significantly greater in groups III (28 and 11%) and IV (28 and 9%) than in group I (7 and 3%) and II (11 and 2%). The presence of potential was unable to identify patients at risk of ventricular tachycardia and sudden death. In another 60 patients with complete branch block, the prognosis was also correlated with the alteration of sinus variability. In conclusion, high amplification ECG correctly evaluated the prognosis of subjects in heart failure. However, analysis of sinus variability should be systematically proposed to detect subjects at high risk of mortality, whether the subject has large or narrow QRS complexes.

[Can signal-averaged electrocardiograms be interpreted in cases of complete bundle branch block?]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of signal-averaged (SA) ECG in cases of complete right (RBBB) or left bundle branch block (LBBB). One hundred and seven patients had RBBB; 42 without cardiac disease (0), 56 with chronic myocardial infarction (MI) and 9 with primary cardiomyopathy (CMP). Seventy-four patients had LBBB: 20 without cardiac disease, 26 with chronic myocardial infarction and 28 with primary cardiomyopathy. A SA ECG (Cardionics, Fidelity) was performed with a 40 Hz band pass and compared with the recordings of 72 healthy controls without bundle branch block. The duration of the averaged QRS (QRS dur), the voltage of the last 40 milliseconds (RMS40) and duration of terminal activity < 40 microV (LAS) were measured. The analysis of results showed that QRS dur was significantly longer in subjects with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (p < 0.05) and in those with advanced cardiac disease (p < 0.05), whatever the type of bundle branch block, and that only the RMS40 distinguished patients with VT from those without VT, irrespective of the underlying cardiac disease and the type of bundle branch block. However, the study of the diagnostic value of each parameter showed very mediocre results: RMS 40 < 20 microV in myocardial infarction and < 17 microV in cardiomyopathy had sensitivities and specificities in RBBB of 73% and 50% respectively, incalculable in CMP, in LBBB 70% and 33%, 77% and 60% respectively; the LAS was unusable. The authors conclude that it is hazardous to interprete SA ECG in bundle branch block, especially in advanced cardiac disease where the specificity of the criteria becomes very low (< 50%).