Health Care-Associated Infections Among Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19, March 2020-March 2022

Importance

The reported incidence of many health care-associated infections (HAIs) increased during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, it is unclear whether this is due to increased patient risk or to increased pressure on the health care system.

Objective

To assess HAI occurrence among patients admitted to hospitals with and without COVID-19.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of inpatients discharged both with and without laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection was conducted. Data were obtained between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022, from community hospitals affiliated with a large health care system in the US.

Exposure

COVID-19 infection.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Occurrence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, and Clostridioides difficile infection as reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network.

Results

Among nearly 5 million hospitalizations in 182 hospitals between 2020 and 2022, the occurrence of health care-associated infections (HAIs) was high among the 313 200 COVID-19 inpatients (median [SD] age, 57 [27.3] years; 56.0% women). Incidence per 100 000 patient-days showed higher HAIs among those with COVID-19 compared with those without. For CLABSI, the incidence for the full 9 quarters of the study was nearly 4-fold higher among the COVID-19 population than the non-COVID-19 population (25.4 vs 6.9). For CAUTI, the incidence in the COVID-19 population was 2.7-fold higher in the COVID-19 population (16.5 vs 6.1), and for MRSA, 3.0-fold higher (11.2 vs 3.7). Quarterly trends were compared with the same quarter in 2019. The greatest increase in the incidence of HAI in comparison with the same quarter in 2019 for the entire population occurred in quarter 3 of 2020 for CLABSI (11.0 vs 7.3), quarter 4 of 2021 for CAUTI (7.8 vs 6.8), and quarter 3 of 2021 for MRSA (5.2 vs 3.9). When limited to the non-COVID-19 population, the increase in CLABSI incidence vs the 2019 incidence was eliminated, and the quarterly rates of MRSA and CAUTI were lower vs the prepandemic 2019 comparator quarter.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study of hospitals during the pandemic, HAI occurrence among inpatients without COVID-19 was similar to that during 2019 despite additional pressures for infection control and health care professionals. The findings suggest that patients with COVID-19 may be more susceptible to HAIs and may require additional prevention measures.

Discontinuation of atorvastatin use in hospital is associated with increased risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND

Statins are a commonly used class of drugs, and reports have suggested that their use may affect COVID-19 disease severity and mortality risk.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this analysis was to determine the effect of discontinuation of previous atorvastatin therapy in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 on the risk of mortality and ventilation.

METHODS

Data from 146,413 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were classified according to statin therapy. Home + in hospital atorvastatin use (continuation of therapy); home + no in hospital atorvastatin use (discontinuation of therapy); no home + no in hospital atorvastatin use (no statins). Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between atorvastatin administration and either mortality or use of mechanical ventilation during the encounter.

RESULTS

Continuous use of atorvastatin (home and in hospital) was associated with a 35% reduction in the odds of mortality compared to patients who received atorvastatin at home but not in hospital (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.72, p < .001). Similarly, the odds of ventilation were lower with continuous atorvastatin therapy (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64-0.77, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of previous atorvastatin therapy is associated with worse outcomes for COVID-19 patients. Providers should consider maintaining existing statin therapy for patients with known or suspected previous use.

Real-World Effectiveness Of Remdesivir In Adults Hospitalized With Covid-19: A Retrospective, Multicenter Comparative Effectiveness Study

Background

There is an urgent need to understand the real-world effectiveness of remdesivir in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative effectiveness study. Individuals hospitalized in a large private healthcare network in the US from February 23, 2020 through February 11, 2021 with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes consistent with symptomatic COVID-19 were included. Remdesivir recipients were matched to controls using time-dependent propensity scores. The primary outcome was time to improvement with a secondary outcome of time to death.

Results

Of 96,859 COVID-19 patients, 42,473 (43.9%) received at least one remdesivir dose. The median age of remdesivir recipients was 65 years, 23,701 (55.8%) were male and 22,819 (53.7%) were non-white. Matches were found for 18,328 patients (43.2%). Remdesivir recipients were significantly more likely to achieve clinical improvement by 28 days (adjusted hazard ratio [1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16-1.22]). Remdesivir patients on no oxygen (aHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.22-1.38) or low-flow oxygen (aHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.19-1.27) were significantly more likely to achieve clinical improvement by 28 days. There was no significant impact on the likelihood of mortality overall (aHR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97-1.08). Remdesivir recipients on low-flow oxygen were significantly less likely to die than controls (aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.92; 28-day mortality 8.4% [865 deaths] for remdesivir patients, 12.5% [1,334 deaths] for controls).

Conclusions

These results support the use of remdesivir for hospitalized COVID-19 patients on no or low-flow oxygen. Routine initiation of remdesivir in more severely ill patients is unlikely to be beneficial.

171. The Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare-Associated Infections

Background

The profound changes wrought by COVID-19 on routine hospital operations may have influenced performance on hospital measures, including healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).

Objective

Evaluate the association between COVID-19 surges and HAI or cluster rates

Methods

Design: Prospective cohort study

Setting

148 HCA Healthcare-affiliated hospitals, 3/1/2020-9/30/2020, and a subset of hospitals with microbiology and cluster data through 12/31/2020

Patients

All inpatients

Measurements

We evaluated the association between COVID-19 surges and HAIs, hospital-onset pathogens, and cluster rates using negative binomial mixed models. To account for local variation in COVID-19 pandemic surge timing, we included the number of discharges with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis per staffed bed per month at each hospital.

Results

Central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia increased as COVID-19 burden increased (P ≤ 0.001 for all), with 60% (95% CI, 23 to 108%) more CLABSI, 43% (95% CI, 8 to 90%) more CAUTI, and 44% (95% CI, 10 to 88%) more cases of MRSA bacteremia than expected over 7 months based on predicted HAIs had there not been COVID-19 cases. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) was not significantly associated with COVID-19 burden. Microbiology data from 81 of the hospitals corroborated the findings. Notably, rates of hospital-onset bloodstream infections and multidrug resistant organisms, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and Gram-negative organisms were each significantly associated with COVID-19 surges (P &lt; 0.05 for all). Finally, clusters of hospital-onset pathogens increased as the COVID-19 burden increased (P = 0.02).

Limitations

Variations in surveillance and reporting may affect HAI data.

Table 1. Effect of an increase in number of COVID-19 discharges on HAIs and hospital-onset pathogens

Conclusion

COVID-19 surges adversely impact HAI rates and clusters of infections within hospitals, emphasizing the need for balancing COVID-related demands with routine hospital infection prevention.

Disclosures

Kenneth Sands, MD, MPH, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product) Susan S. Huang, MD, MPH, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals and nursing homes received contributed antiseptic and cleaning products)Molnlycke (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals and nursing homes received contributed antiseptic and cleaning products)Stryker (Sage) (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals and nursing homes received contributed antiseptic and cleaning products)Xttrium (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals and nursing homes received contributed antiseptic and cleaning products) Ken Kleinman, PhD, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic products)Molnlycke (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic products) Edward Septimus, MD, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic products)Molnlycke (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic products) Eunice J. Blanchard, MSN RN, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product) Russell Poland, PhD, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product) Micaela H. Coady, MS, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product)Molnlycke (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product) Deborah S. Yokoe, MD, MPH, Nothing to disclose Julia Moody, MS, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product)Molnlycke (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product) Richard Platt, MD, MSc, Medline (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product)Molnlycke (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product) Jonathan B. Perlin, MD, PhD, Medline (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product)Molnlycke (Other Financial or Material Support, Conducted studies in which participating hospitals received contributed antiseptic product)

Reactions and COVID-19 disease progression following SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody infusion

SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been proposed as a treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19, with favorable outcomes reported in clinical trials and an emergency use authorization granted by the Food and Drug Administration. Real-world data remain limited, however, and thus this analysis presents findings from over 6,500 outpatient administrations of mAb at facilities affiliated with a large healthcare organization in the United States. Within 48 hours of mAb infusion, 15.6% (1,043) of patients received a drug that was indicative of a possible reaction to the infusion; the majority of these were mild (e.g., acetaminophen). Approximately 5.2% of patients who received mAb (n=347) had a post-infusion emergency department visit or admission for COVID-19 disease progression. The results of this analysis indicate that patients who receive mAb have a low likelihood of both an immediate negative reaction to the treatment as well as future inpatient admission related to COVID-19 disease progression.

Universal Protection: Operationalizing Infection Prevention Guidance in the COVID-19 Era

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic has required facilities to quickly respond to a myriad of infection prevention recommendations, as well as design their own protocols. The varied and changing guidance has been difficult for staff to absorb and has presented challenges for managing compliance.

APPROACH

HCA Healthcare recognized the need for a coordinated approach to managing infection prevention guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic and a mechanism for monitoring compliance and responding to implementation challenges remotely. This innovation consisted of a bundle of infection prevention guidance referred to as the Universal Protection Framework that collated existing recommendations into an easy-to-understand structure with four domains: core infection prevention practices, access control, distancing, and patient flow. This was supported by education and clear communication. A remote monitoring program that incorporated a combination of report review and virtual observation via videoconferencing using an on-site leader as a navigator for the discussion assessed 46 survey domains for compliance.

RESULTS

This framework was implemented in a large health care system, and to date compliance has been monitored at 15 facilities. Overall, compliance was high (average, 90%). High compliance was seen with oversight and distribution of personal protective equipment, cohorting of COVID-19 patients, facility access controls, and employee exposure monitoring. Challenges were identified in compliance with social distancing and universal masking.

CONCLUSION

Complex infection prevention expectations for COVID-19 can be communicated and implemented by bundling into a simple framework. This innovation also demonstrated that compliance can be measured remotely, which may be useful even after the pandemic challenges have passed.

No clinical benefit in mortality associated with hydroxychloroquine treatment in patients with COVID-19

Background

The use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), with or without concurrent administration of azithromycin (AZM), for treatment of COVID-19 has received considerable attention. The purpose of this study was to determine whether HCQ administration is associated with improved mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected during the care process for COVID-19 positive patients discharged from facilities affiliated with a large healthcare system in the United States as of April 27, 2020. Patients were categorized by treatment with HCQ (in addition to standard supportive therapy) or receipt of supportive therapy with no HCQ. Patient outcomes were evaluated for in-hospital mortality. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were accounted for through a multivariable regression analysis.

Results

A total of 1669 patients were evaluated (no HCQ, n = 696; HCQ, n = 973). When adjusting for patient characteristics, receipt of AZM, and severity of disease at admission, there was no beneficial effect of receipt of HCQ on the risk of death. In this population, there was an 81% increase in the risk of mortality among patients who received HCQ at any time during their hospital stay versus no HCQ exposure (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.20–2.77, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

In this retrospective analysis, we found that there was no benefit of administration of HCQ on mortality in COVID-19 patients. These results support recent changes to clinical trials that discourage the use of HCQ in COVID-19 patients.

2019 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards: SPOTting Sepsis to Save Lives: A Nationwide Computer Algorithm for Early Detection of Sepsis: Innovation in Patient Safety and Quality at the National Level (Eisenberg Award)

BACKGROUND

In recognition of the potential of data to drive care and the need for early identification of patients with sepsis, HCA Healthcare developed an automated sepsis detection algorithm-SPOT (Sepsis Prediction and Optimization of Therapy). The algorithm was deployed at scale and served as a mechanism to reduce the time to detection and improve sepsis mortality in 173 hospitals across the United States.

METHODS

The SPOT algorithm was designed as a rules-based detection of defined criteria that would interpret available electronic and basic laboratory data in near real time. Working from an organizational recognition of the need to construct a national clinical data warehouse to allow for the aggregation and analysis of data streams, HCA Healthcare designed and deployed SPOT and delivered the alert from the algorithm to the bedside to initiate existing clinical workflows for patients with sepsis.

RESULTS

SPOT improved the timeliness of sepsis detection by providing alerts when signals of sepsis become available, triggering initiation of sepsis screens. This gave an advantage of about six hours over the legacy practice of sepsis screening at shift change. When deployed alongside existing sepsis improvement initiatives, SPOT was associated with an acceleration of improvement in mortality-particularly in the not-present-on-admission (NPOA) septic shock population, the patients at greatest risk for mortality. This population had seen little improvement with prior initiatives, but mortality improved 3.9 percentage points from 2018 to 2019. When accounting for seasonal variation, there was a decline in mortality rate following the deployment of SPOT, as compared to the year prior, of 9.9% for NPOA severe sepsis and 5.1% for NPOA septic shock.

CONCLUSION

Development of the SPOT algorithm for the detection of sepsis from data available in the electronic health record resulted in more timely recognition, faster initiation of treatment, and improved survival for patients.

Evaluating the Risk Factors for Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infections in a Large Healthcare System

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study of over 1 million patients at 150 US hospitals, proton pump inhibitors increased the odds of a patient having hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection as did third and fourth generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, and piperacillin/tazobactam. These findings support appropriate prescribing of acid-suppression therapy and high-risk antibiotics.

Driving stroke quality improvement at scale in EDs across a nationwide network of hospitals: strategies and interventions

OBJECTIVES

Reducing the treatment time while increasing the proportion of eligible stroke patients who receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been a priority for many quality improvement efforts. Recent studies have primarily focused on identifying interventions that reduce door-to-needle (DTN) time, while comparatively little has been done to determine whether these interventions also improve tPA rates.

METHODS

In order to investigate interventions related to process improvements, an electronic dashboard serving as a stroke performance tool was implemented to store and retrieve patient outcome data. These data were used to study the efficacy of interventions designed to facilitate triage of stroke patients in the ED, and determine the individual interventions associated with the most significant improvements in the fraction of patients receiving tPA and in reducing the DTN time. Stroke performance data from the dashboard collected over a 2-year period (2015-2017) from 89 US hospitals were analysed with respect to interventions implemented by individual facilities, as verified by a hospital survey.

RESULTS

A statistically significant association was found between increases in the fraction of patients receiving tPA and reductions in DTN time over the study period. These improvements in outcomes were most strongly associated with process interventions that allocate stroke-specific physical and human resources in the ED, most notably a designated emergency room space for stroke, and with workflows that decrease the time to key checkpoints for determining a patient's eligibility for tPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the stroke performance tool was leveraged to identify the programmes and process interventions that lead to improved patient outcomes and allow EDs to better prioritise process interventions and resources.

Implementing an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system: Lessons learned from community hospitals

BACKGROUND

Measuring and providing feedback about hand hygiene (HH) compliance is a complicated process. Electronic HH monitoring systems have been proposed as a possible solution; however, there is little information available about how to successfully implement and maintain these systems for maximum benefit in community hospitals.

METHODS

An electronic HH monitoring system was implemented in 3 community hospitals by teams at each facility with support from the system vendor. Compliance rates were measured by the electronic monitoring system. The implementation challenges, solutions, and drivers of success were monitored within each facility.

RESULTS

The electronic HH monitoring systems tracked on average more than 220,000 compliant HH events per facility per month, with an average monthly compliance rate >85%. The sharing of best practices between facilities was valuable in addressing challenges encountered during implementation and maintaining a high rate of use.

DISCUSSION

Drivers of success included a collaborative environment, leadership commitment, using data to drive improvement, consistent and constant messaging, staff empowerment, and patient involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Realizing the full benefit of investments in electronic HH monitoring systems requires careful consideration of implementation strategies, planning for ongoing support and maintenance, and presenting data in a meaningful way to empower and inspire staff.