1
|
Pawlowski J, Cermakova K, Cordier T, Frontalini F, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Merzi T. Assessing the potential of nematode metabarcoding for benthic monitoring of offshore oil platforms. Sci Total Environ 2024; 933:173092. [PMID: 38729369 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Environmental DNA metabarcoding is gaining momentum as a time and cost-effective tool for biomonitoring and environmental impact assessment. Yet, its use as a replacement for the conventional marine benthic monitoring based on morphological analysis of macrofauna is still challenging. Here we propose to study the meiofauna, which is much better represented in sediment DNA samples. We focus on nematodes, which are the most numerous and diverse group of meiofauna. Our aim is to assess the potential of nematode metabarcoding to monitor impacts associated with offshore oil platform activities. To achieve this goal, we used nematode-optimized marker (18S V1V2-Nema) and universal eukaryotic marker (18S V9) region to analyse 252 sediment DNA samples collected near three offshore oil platforms in the North Sea. For both markers, we analysed changes in alpha and beta diversity in relation to distance from the platforms and environmental variables. We also defined three impact classes based on selected environmental variables that are associated with oil extraction activities and used random forest classifiers to compare the predictive performance of both datasets. Our results show that alpha- and beta-diversity of nematodes varies with the increasing distance from the platforms. The variables directly related to platform activity, such as Ba and THC, strongly influence the nematode community. The nematode metabarcoding data provide more robust predictive models than eukaryotic data. Furthermore, the nematode community appears more stable in time and space, as illustrated by the overlap of nematode datasets obtained from the same platform three years apart. A significative negative correlation between distance and Shannon diversity also advocates for higher performance of the V1V2-Nema over the V9. Overall, these results suggest that the sensitivity of nematodes is higher compared to the eukaryotic community. Hence, nematode metabarcoding has the potential to become an effective tool for benthic monitoring in marine environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Pawlowski
- Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, Poland; ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland.
| | - K Cermakova
- ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
| | - T Cordier
- NORCE Climate and Environment, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Norway
| | - F Frontalini
- Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy
| | | | - T Merzi
- TotalEnergies OneTech, Centre Scientifique et Technique Jean Feger, Pau, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Damasceno FL, Alves Martins MV, Frontalini F, Pawlowski J, Cermakova K, Angeles IB, Costa Santos LG, Filho JGM, Francescangeli F, Senez-Mello TM, Castelo WFL, Rebouças RC, Duleba W, Mello E Sousa SHD, Laut L, Antonioli L. Assessment of the ecological quality status of the Sepetiba Bay (SE Brazil): When metabarcoding meets morphology on foraminifera. Mar Environ Res 2024; 195:106340. [PMID: 38232436 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, the region surrounding Sepetiba Bay (SB; SE Brazil) has become a hub of intense urban expansion and economic exploitation in response to ore transport and industrial and port activities. As a result, contaminants have been introduced into the bay, leading to an overall worsening of the environmental quality. The present work applies for the first time a foraminiferal morphology-based approach (M) and eDNA-based metabarcoding sequencing (G), along with geochemical data to assess the ecological quality status (EcoQS) in the SB. Principal component analysis shows that the eDNA and morphospecies diversity as well as most of the taxa relative abundance decline in response to the environmental stress (ES) gradient related to total organic carbon (TOC) and metal pollution. Based on ecological indices, Exp(H'bc) (G), Exp(H'bc) (M), foraminifera ATZI marine biotic index (Foram-AMBI), Foram Stress Index (FSI), and geochemical indices (TOC and Potential Ecological Risk Index), the lowest values of EcoQS (i.e., bad to moderate) are inferred in the innermost part of the SB. Despite minor discrepancies among the six EcoQS indices, an agreement has been found for 63% of the stations. To improve the agreement between the ecological indices, it is necessary to fill the gap in species ecology; information on the ecology of many species is still unknown. This work reinforces the importance of molecular analysis and morphological methods in environmental impact studies and confirms the reliability of foraminiferal metabarcoding in EcoQS assessment. This is the first study evaluating the EcoQS in the South Atlantic by using combined foraminiferal eDNA metabarcoding with morphological data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrício Leandro Damasceno
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, Av. São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, CEP: 20550-013 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
| | - Maria Virgínia Alves Martins
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, Av. São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, CEP: 20550-013 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Universidade de Aveiro, GeoBioTec, Departamento de Geociências, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
| | - Fabrizio Frontalini
- Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", 61029, Urbino, Italy.
| | - Jan Pawlowski
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Chemin du Pont-du-Centenaire 109, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland; Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 81-712 Sopot, Poland.
| | - Kristina Cermakova
- ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Chemin du Pont-du-Centenaire 109, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland.
| | - Inès Barrenechea Angeles
- Department of Geosciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Dramsvegen 201, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway.
| | | | | | - Fabio Francescangeli
- Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 6, 1700 Fribourg/Freiburg, Switzerland.
| | - Thaise M Senez-Mello
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, Av. São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, CEP: 20550-013 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Wellen Fernanda Louzada Castelo
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, Av. São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, CEP: 20550-013 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
| | - Renata Cardia Rebouças
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, Av. São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, CEP: 20550-013 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
| | - Wania Duleba
- Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades da Universidade de São Paulo. Rua Arlindo Bettio, 1000, Vila Guaraciaba, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.
| | - Silvia Helena de Mello E Sousa
- Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo (IOUSP). Address: Pça. do Oceanográfico, 191, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Lazaro Laut
- Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UNIRIO, Av. Pasteur 458, s. 500, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Luzia Antonioli
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, Av. São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, CEP: 20550-013 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pawlowski J, Bruce K, Panksep K, Aguirre FI, Amalfitano S, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Baussant T, Bouchez A, Carugati L, Cermakova K, Cordier T, Corinaldesi C, Costa FO, Danovaro R, Dell'Anno A, Duarte S, Eisendle U, Ferrari BJD, Frontalini F, Frühe L, Haegerbaeumer A, Kisand V, Krolicka A, Lanzén A, Leese F, Lejzerowicz F, Lyautey E, Maček I, Sagova-Marečková M, Pearman JK, Pochon X, Stoeck T, Vivien R, Weigand A, Fazi S. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods. Sci Total Environ 2022; 818:151783. [PMID: 34801504 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding (parallel sequencing of DNA/RNA for identification of whole communities within a targeted group) is revolutionizing the field of aquatic biomonitoring. To date, most metabarcoding studies aiming to assess the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems have focused on water eDNA and macroinvertebrate bulk samples. However, the eDNA metabarcoding has also been applied to soft sediment samples, mainly for assessing microbial or meiofaunal biota. Compared to classical methodologies based on manual sorting and morphological identification of benthic taxa, eDNA metabarcoding offers potentially important advantages for assessing the environmental quality of sediments. The methods and protocols utilized for sediment eDNA metabarcoding can vary considerably among studies, and standardization efforts are needed to improve their robustness, comparability and use within regulatory frameworks. Here, we review the available information on eDNA metabarcoding applied to sediment samples, with a focus on sampling, preservation, and DNA extraction steps. We discuss challenges specific to sediment eDNA analysis, including the variety of different sources and states of eDNA and its persistence in the sediment. This paper aims to identify good-practice strategies and facilitate method harmonization for routine use of sediment eDNA in future benthic monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Pawlowski
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 81-712 Sopot, Poland; ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - K Bruce
- NatureMetrics Ltd, CABI Site, Bakeham Lane, Egham TW20 9TY, UK
| | - K Panksep
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu 50411, Estonia; Chair of Hydrobiology and Fishery, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia; Chair of Aquaculture, Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia
| | - F I Aguirre
- Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Monterotondo, Rome, Italy
| | - S Amalfitano
- Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Monterotondo, Rome, Italy
| | - L Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Baussant
- Norwegian Research Center AS, NORCE Environment, Marine Ecology Group, Mekjarvik 12, 4070 Randaberg, Norway
| | - A Bouchez
- INRAE, CARRTEL, 74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France
| | - L Carugati
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy
| | - K Cermakova
- ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Cordier
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; NORCE Climate, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Jahnebakken 5, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - C Corinaldesi
- Department of Materials, Environmental Sciences and Urban Planning, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy
| | - F O Costa
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
| | - R Danovaro
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy
| | - A Dell'Anno
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy
| | - S Duarte
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
| | - U Eisendle
- University of Salzburg, Dept. of Biosciences, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - B J D Ferrari
- Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology (Ecotox Centre), EPFL ENAC IIE-GE, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - F Frontalini
- Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, Urbino University, Urbino, Italy
| | - L Frühe
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology Group, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - A Haegerbaeumer
- Bielefeld University, Animal Ecology, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - V Kisand
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu 50411, Estonia
| | - A Krolicka
- Norwegian Research Center AS, NORCE Environment, Marine Ecology Group, Mekjarvik 12, 4070 Randaberg, Norway
| | - A Lanzén
- AZTI, Marine Research, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Pasaia, Gipuzkoa, Spain; IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - F Leese
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Germany
| | - F Lejzerowicz
- Center for Microbiome Innovation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - E Lyautey
- Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France
| | - I Maček
- Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies (FAMNIT), University of Primorska, Glagoljaška 8, 6000 Koper, Slovenia
| | - M Sagova-Marečková
- Czech University of Life Sciences, Dept. of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J K Pearman
- Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042, New Zealand
| | - X Pochon
- Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042, New Zealand; Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Warkworth 0941, New Zealand
| | - T Stoeck
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology Group, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - R Vivien
- Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology (Ecotox Centre), EPFL ENAC IIE-GE, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A Weigand
- National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg, 25 Rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - S Fazi
- Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sagova-Mareckova M, Boenigk J, Bouchez A, Cermakova K, Chonova T, Cordier T, Eisendle U, Elersek T, Fazi S, Fleituch T, Frühe L, Gajdosova M, Graupner N, Haegerbaeumer A, Kelly AM, Kopecky J, Leese F, Nõges P, Orlic S, Panksep K, Pawlowski J, Petrusek A, Piggott JJ, Rusch JC, Salis R, Schenk J, Simek K, Stovicek A, Strand DA, Vasquez MI, Vrålstad T, Zlatkovic S, Zupancic M, Stoeck T. Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring. Water Res 2021; 191:116767. [PMID: 33418487 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Bioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes (bacteria, archaea and protists) are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sagova-Mareckova
- Dept. of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 16500, Czechia.
| | - J Boenigk
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany
| | - A Bouchez
- UMR CARRTEL, INRAE, UMR Carrtel, 75 av. de Corzent, FR-74203 Thonon les Bains cedex, France; University Savoie Mont-Blanc, UMR CARRTEL, FR-73370 Le Bourget du Lac, France
| | - K Cermakova
- ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 15, av. Sécheron, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Chonova
- UMR CARRTEL, INRAE, UMR Carrtel, 75 av. de Corzent, FR-74203 Thonon les Bains cedex, France; University Savoie Mont-Blanc, UMR CARRTEL, FR-73370 Le Bourget du Lac, France
| | - T Cordier
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Science III, 4 Boulevard d'Yvoy, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - U Eisendle
- University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - T Elersek
- National Institute of Biology, Vecna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - S Fazi
- Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Via Salaria km 29,300 - C.P. 10, 00015 Monterotondo St., Rome, Italy
| | - T Fleituch
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
| | - L Frühe
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - M Gajdosova
- Dept. of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12844 Prague, Czechia
| | - N Graupner
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany
| | - A Haegerbaeumer
- Dept. of Animal Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - A-M Kelly
- School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, D02 PN40, Ireland
| | - J Kopecky
- Epidemiology and Ecology of Microoganisms, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, 16106 Prague 6, Czechia
| | - F Leese
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany; Aquatic Ecosystem Resarch, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstrasse 5 D-45141 Essen, Germany
| | - P Nõges
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu 51006, Estonia
| | - S Orlic
- Institute Ruđer Bošković, Bijenička 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; Center of Excellence for Science and Technology Integrating Mediterranean, Bijenička 54,10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - K Panksep
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu 51006, Estonia
| | - J Pawlowski
- ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 15, av. Sécheron, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Science III, 4 Boulevard d'Yvoy, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Powstańców Warszawy 55, 81-712 Sopot, Poland
| | - A Petrusek
- Dept. of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12844 Prague, Czechia
| | - J J Piggott
- School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, D02 PN40, Ireland
| | - J C Rusch
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - R Salis
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - J Schenk
- Dept. of Animal Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - K Simek
- Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre CAS, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czechia
| | - A Stovicek
- Dept. of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 16500, Czechia
| | - D A Strand
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway
| | - M I Vasquez
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Arch. Kyprianos Str., 3036 Limassol, Cyprus
| | - T Vrålstad
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway
| | - S Zlatkovic
- Ministry of Environmental Protection, Omladinskih brigada 1, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia; Agency "Akvatorija", 11. krajiške divizije 49, 11090 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - M Zupancic
- National Institute of Biology, Vecna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - T Stoeck
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mauffrey F, Cordier T, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Cermakova K, Merzi T, Delefosse M, Blanc P, Pawlowski J. Benthic monitoring of oil and gas offshore platforms in the North Sea using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol 2020; 30:3007-3022. [PMID: 33070453 DOI: 10.1111/mec.15698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Since 2010, considerable efforts have been undertaken to monitor the environmental status of European marine waters and ensuring the development of methodological standards for the evaluation of this status. However, the current routine biomonitoring implicates time-consuming and costly manual sorting and morphological identification of benthic macrofauna. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding represents an alternative to the traditional monitoring method with very promising results. Here, we tested it further by performing eDNA metabarcoding of benthic eukaryotic communities in the vicinity of two offshore oil and gas platforms in the North Sea. Three different genetic markers (18S V1V2, 18S V9 and COI) were used to assess the environmental pressures induced by the platforms. All markers showed patterns of alpha and beta diversity consistent with morphology-based macrofauna analyses. In particular, the communities' structure inferred from metabarcoding and morphological data significantly changed along distance gradients from the platforms. The impact of the operational discharges was also detected by the variation of biotic index values, AMBI index showing the best correlation between morphological and eDNA data sets. Finally, the sediment physicochemical parameters were used to build a local de novo pressure index that served as benchmark to test the potential of a taxonomy-free approach. Our study demonstrates that metabarcoding approach outperforms morphology-based approach and can be used as a cost and time-saving alternative solution to the traditional morphology-based monitoring in order to monitor more efficiently the impact of industrial activities on marine biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Mauffrey
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tristan Cordier
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Cermakova
- ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Merzi
- Total SA, Centre Scientifique et Technique Jean Feger, Pau, France
| | | | - Philippe Blanc
- Total SA, Centre Scientifique et Technique Jean Feger, Pau, France
| | - Jan Pawlowski
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, Geneva, Switzerland.,Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Frontalini F, Cordier T, Balassi E, Armynot du Chatelet E, Cermakova K, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Martins MVA, Bucci C, Scantamburlo E, Treglia M, Bonamin V, Pawlowski J. Benthic foraminiferal metabarcoding and morphology-based assessment around three offshore gas platforms: Congruence and complementarity. Environ Int 2020; 144:106049. [PMID: 32835923 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Since the 1960 s, there has been a rapid expansion of drilling activities in the central and northern Adriatic Sea to meet the increasing global energy demand. The discharges of organic and inorganic pollutants, as well as the alteration of the sediment substrate, are among the main impacts associated with these activities. In the present study, we evaluate the response of benthic foraminifera to the activities of three gas platforms in the northwestern Adriatic Sea, with a special focus on the Armida A platform for which extensive geochemical data (organic matter, trace elements, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, other hydrocarbons, and volatile organic compounds) are available. The response to disturbance is assessed by analyzing the foraminiferal diversity using the traditional morphology-based approach and by 18S rDNA-based metabarcoding. The two methods give congruent results, showing relatively lower foraminiferal diversity and higher dominance values at stations closer to the platforms (<50 m). The taxonomic compositions of the morphological and metabarcoding datasets are very different, the latter being dominated by monothalamous, mainly soft-walled species. However, compositional changes consistently occur at 50 m from the platform and can be related to variations in sediment grain-size variation and higher concentrations of Ni, Zn, Ba, hydrocarbons and total organic carbon. Additionally, several morphospecies and Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) show strong correlations with distance from the platform and with environmental parameters extracted from BIOENV analysis. Some of these MOTUs have the potential to become new bioindicators, complementing the assemblage of hard-shelled foraminiferal species detected through microscopic analyses. The congruence and complementarity between metabarcoding and morphological approaches support the application of foraminiferal metabarcoding in routine biomonitoring surveys as a reliable, time- and cost-effective methodology to assess the environmental impacts of marine industries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Frontalini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy
| | - Tristan Cordier
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eszter Balassi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy
| | - Eric Armynot du Chatelet
- Laboratoire d'Océanologie et de Géosciences UMR 8187 LOG CNRS/Lille/ULCO, Université de Lille, Bât SN5, Cité Scientifique, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
| | - Kristina Cermakova
- ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Virginia Alves Martins
- Laboratory of Micropaleontology, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Universidade de Aveiro, GeoBioTec, Departamento de Geociências, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Carla Bucci
- Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Jan Pawlowski
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 81-712 Sopot, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cordier T, Frontalini F, Cermakova K, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Treglia M, Scantamburlo E, Bonamin V, Pawlowski J. Multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding survey to assess the environmental impact of three offshore gas platforms in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy). Mar Environ Res 2019; 146:24-34. [PMID: 30890270 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding represents a new promising tool for biomonitoring and environmental impact assessment. One of the main advantages of eDNA metabarcoding, compared to the traditional morphotaxonomy-based methods, is to provide a more holistic biodiversity information that includes inconspicuous morphologically non-identifiable taxa. Here, we use eDNA metabarcoding to survey marine biodiversity in the vicinity of the three offshore gas platforms in North Adriatic Sea (Italy). We isolated eDNA from 576 water and sediment samples collected at 32 sampling sites situated along four axes at increasing distances from the gas platforms. We obtained about 46 million eDNA sequences for 5 markers from nuclear 18S V1V2, 18S V4, 18S 37F and mitochondrial 16S and COI genes that cover a wide diversity of benthic and planktonic eukaryotes. Our results showed some impact of platform activities on benthic and pelagic communities at very close distance (<50 m), while communities for intermediate (125 m, 250 m, 500 m) and reference (1000 m, 2000 m) sites did not show any particular biodiversity changes that could be related to platforms activities. The most significant community change along the distance gradient was obtained with the 18S V1V2 marker targeting benthic eukaryotes, even though other markers showed similar trends, but to a lesser extent. These results were congruent with the AMBI index inferred from the eDNA sequences assigned to benthic macrofauna. We finally explored the relation between various physicochemical parameters, including hydrocarbons, on benthic community in the case of one of the platforms. Our results showed that these communities were not significantly impacted by most of hydrocarbons, but rather by macro-elements and sediment texture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan Cordier
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Fabrizio Frontalini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate (DiSPeA), Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", 61029, Urbino, Italy
| | - Kristina Cermakova
- ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Switzerland; ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mauro Treglia
- SGS Italia S.p.A., 35010, Villafranca Padovana, Italy
| | | | | | - Jan Pawlowski
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Switzerland; ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vanderperre B, Cermakova K, Escoffier J, Kaba M, Bender T, Nef S, Martinou JC. MPC1-like Is a Placental Mammal-specific Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier Subunit Expressed in Postmeiotic Male Germ Cells. J Biol Chem 2016; 291:16448-61. [PMID: 27317664 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m116.733840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Selective transport of pyruvate across the inner mitochondrial membrane by the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC) is a fundamental step that couples cytosolic and mitochondrial metabolism. The recent molecular identification of the MPC complex has revealed two interacting subunits, MPC1 and MPC2. Although in yeast, an additional subunit, MPC3, can functionally replace MPC2, no alternative MPC subunits have been described in higher eukaryotes. Here, we report for the first time the existence of a novel MPC subunit termed MPC1-like (MPC1L), which is present uniquely in placental mammals. MPC1L shares high sequence, structural, and topological homology with MPC1. In addition, we provide several lines of evidence to show that MPC1L is functionally equivalent to MPC1: 1) when co-expressed with MPC2, it rescues pyruvate import in a MPC-deleted yeast strain; 2) in mammalian cells, it can associate with MPC2 to form a functional carrier as assessed by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer; 3) in MPC1 depleted mouse embryonic fibroblasts, MPC1L rescues the loss of pyruvate-driven respiration and stabilizes MPC2 expression; and 4) MPC1- and MPC1L-mediated pyruvate imports show similar efficiency. However, we show that MPC1L has a highly specific expression pattern and is localized almost exclusively in testis and more specifically in postmeiotic spermatids and sperm cells. This is in marked contrast to MPC1/MPC2, which are ubiquitously expressed throughout the organism. To date, the biological importance of this alternative MPC complex during spermatogenesis in placental mammals remains unknown. Nevertheless, these findings open up new avenues for investigating the structure-function relationship within the MPC complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jessica Escoffier
- the Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology, and the Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
| | - Mayis Kaba
- the Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology, and the Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
| | | | - Serge Nef
- the Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology, and the Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|