1
|
Kafka M, Horninger A, di Santo G, Virgolini I, Neuwirt H, Unterrainer LM, Kunte SC, Deiss E, Paffenholz P, Heidenreich A, Rasul S, Einspieler H, Shariat SF, Rajwa P, Dozauer R, Tsaur I, Medlock E, Rölz N, Rausch S, la Fougère C, Trautwein N, Roesch MC, Merseburger AS, Zattoni F, Sepulcri M, Ladurner M, Bektic J, Gandaglia G, Horninger W, Heidegger I. Real-world Outcomes and Predictive Biomarkers for 177Lutetium Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Treatment in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Observational Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:421-429. [PMID: 37604763 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Association of Urology guidelines include the lutetium-177 (177Lu) PSMA-617 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand as a therapy option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A major challenge in clinical practice is to pursue a personalized treatment approach based on robust predictive biomarkers. OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of 177Lu PSMA in real-world practice and to elaborate clinical biomarkers for evaluating treatment responses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a retrospective observational study including 233 patients with mCRPC treated with 177Lu PSMA in eight high-volume European centers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Baseline characteristics and clinical parameters during and after 177Lu PSMA treatment were documented. Correlations to treatment response were analyzed using χ2 and log-rank tests, with differences between groups with and without disease progression calculated using a Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were measured using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease of ≥30% was observed in 41.7%, 63.5%, and 77.8% of patients after the first, second, and third treatment cycle, respectively. Restaging performed via PSMA positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed that 33.7% of patients had an imaging-based response, including two patients with a complete response, while 13.4% had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5 mo and the median time until the start of a consecutive antineoplastic therapy was 8.5 mo. Of importance, a PSA decrease ≥30% after the first two cycles of 177Lu PSMA (1 cycle: p = 0.0003; 2 cycles: p = 0.004), absolute PSA after the first three cycles (1 cycle: p = 0.011; 2 cycles: p = 0.0005; 3 cycles: p = 0.002), and a PSA doubling time >6 mo (p = 0.009) were significantly correlated to treatment response. Furthermore, gamma-glutamyl transferase ≤31 U/L at the start of 177Lu PSMA therapy was correlated with 1.5 times higher risk of progression for patients without but not with visceral metastases (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS 177Lu PSMA is an effective treatment option in mCRPC in the real-world setting. A PSA decrease ≥30% after the first two cycles is an early marker of response that can be easily implemented in clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY 177Lu PSMA is a radioactive agent approved for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. We reviewed its use outside of clinical trials for patients treated at eight European centers. We found that 177Lu PSMA is an effective treatment option in real-world practice. A PSA (prostate-specific antigen) decrease of ≥30% after the first two therapy cycles is an early indicator of response to treatment and can be used in personalizing treatments for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Kafka
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andreas Horninger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gianpaolo di Santo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hannes Neuwirt
- Department of Internal Medicine IV - Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie C Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Emil Deiss
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Holger Einspieler
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Robert Dozauer
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ellen Medlock
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Niklas Rölz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Steffen Rausch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Nils Trautwein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marie C Roesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Michael Ladurner
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jasmin Bektic
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ebner R, Lohse A, Fabritius MP, Rübenthaler J, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Völter F, Schmid HP, Unterrainer LM, Öcal O, Hinterberger A, Spitzweg C, Auernhammer CJ, Geyer T, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Holzgreve A, Grawe F. Validation of the standardization framework SSTR-RADS 1.0 for neuroendocrine tumors using the novel SSTR‑targeting peptide [ 18F]SiTATE. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10788-3. [PMID: 38769164 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10788-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SSTR-PET/CT) using [68Ga]-labeled tracers is a widely used imaging modality for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Recently, [18F]SiTATE, a SiFAlin tagged [Tyr3]-octreotate (TATE) PET tracer, has shown great potential due to favorable clinical characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of Somatostatin Receptor-Reporting and Data System 1.0 (SSTR-RADS 1.0) for structured interpretation and treatment planning of NET using [18F]SiTATE. METHODS Four readers assessed [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT of 95 patients according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria at two different time points. Each reader evaluated up to five target lesions per scan. The overall scan score and the decision on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) were considered. Inter- and intra-reader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS The ICC analysis on the inter-reader agreement using SSTR-RADS 1.0 for identical target lesions (ICC ≥ 85%), overall scan score (ICC ≥ 90%), and the decision to recommend PRRT (ICC ≥ 85%) showed excellent agreement. However, significant differences were observed in recommending PRRT among experienced readers (ER) (p = 0.020) and inexperienced readers (IR) (p = 0.004). Compartment-based analysis demonstrated good to excellent inter-reader agreement for most organs (ICC ≥ 74%), except for lymph nodes (ICC ≥ 53%). CONCLUSION SSTR-RADS 1.0 represents a highly reproducible and consistent framework system for stratifying SSTR-targeted PET/CT scans, even using the novel SSTR-ligand [18F]SiTATE. Some inter-reader variability was observed regarding the evaluation of uptake intensity prior to PRRT as well as compartment scoring of lymph nodes, indicating that those categories require special attention during further clinical validation and might be refined in a future SSTR-RADS version 1.1. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a consistent framework for categorizing somatostatin receptor-targeted PET/CT scans when using [18F]SiTATE. The framework serves as a valuable tool for facilitating and improving the management of patients with NET. KEY POINTS SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a valuable tool for managing patients with NET. SSTR-RADS 1.0 categorizes patients with showing strong agreement across diverse reader expertise. As an alternative to [68Ga]-labeled PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor imaging, SSTR-RADS 1.0 reliably classifies [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ebner
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - A Lohse
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M P Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - B Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - R Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - F Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H P Schmid
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - L M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - O Öcal
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Hinterberger
- DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Spitzweg
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C J Auernhammer
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - T Geyer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Grawe
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eismann L, Ledderose ST, Enzinger B, Berg E, Westhofen T, Rodler S, Schulz GB, Toms J, Holzgreve A, Gildehaus FJ, Brendel M, Cyran CC, Unterrainer M, Stief CG, Bartenstein P, Schlenker B, Unterrainer LM. [ 68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for penile cancer - a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06763-1. [PMID: 38761187 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06763-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Penile cancer is a rare entity and has a good prognosis in localized stage. Delayed surgical treatment of lymphatic disease is associated with poor overall survival but conventional imaging cannot detect occult lymph node metastasis sufficiently. Imaging cancer related fibroblasts has shown promising results as non-invasive staging tool in various tumor entities but has not yet been evaluated in penile cancer. METHODS In this single-center pilot study, patients planned for surgical treatment for penile cancer underwent preoperatively [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. Post-operative histopathology was compared to [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT results. RESULTS From January 2022 to June 2022, a total number 11 patients with histopathologically proven penile cancer underwent surgery and received [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT prior therapy. 8 primary tumor sites and 4 lymph node regions were analyzed. FAPI uptake was increased on primary tumor site (SUVmax 16.2 (9.1 - 25.8)). Histopathological proven lymph node regions showed highly increased FAPI uptakes (SUVmax 17.9 (16.4 - 23.5) on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. CONCLUSION In this first pilot cohort, there were no false-positive FAPI uptake which might allow the detection of occult lymph node metastasis by [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and might consequently lead to omitting lymph node regions during surgery that had no increased FAPI uptake pre-operatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennert Eismann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Stephan T Ledderose
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benazir Enzinger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Elena Berg
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Thilo Westhofen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Gerald B Schulz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Toms
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franz J Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Die Radiologie, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris Schlenker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Bayerisches Zentrum Für Krebsforschung (BZKF), Partner Site LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ebner R, Rübenthaler J, Ricke J, Sheikh GT, Unterrainer LM, Auernhammer CJ, Spitzweg C, Brendel M, Schmid-Tannwald C, Cyran CC. [Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract : Value of (hybrid) imaging diagnostics in radiology]. Radiologie (Heidelb) 2024:10.1007/s00117-024-01296-y. [PMID: 38713221 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-024-01296-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors that predominantly arise in the gastrointestinal tract. At the time of initial diagnosis, the NET has already spread locoregionally in about half of the patients, and 27% of patients have already developed distant metastases. Since this plays a crucial role in therapy planning, accurate diagnostic imaging is important. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS Due to its high temporal and spatial resolution (multiphasic including arterial phase), computed tomography (CT) plays a decisive role in primary staging and follow-up care, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with its excellent soft tissue contrast offers advantages in the assessment of parenchymal organs in the upper abdomen. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS Somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography (PET) provides additional functional information that not only helps to detect the primary tumor and distant metastases, but also has a significant influence on therapeutic management in a theranostic approach. PERFORMANCE Hybrid imaging using SSR-PET/CT has proven to be particularly effective in the detection of NET. Compared to conventional imaging, it provides additional information in 68% of patients, which has a significant impact on clinical management. ACHIEVEMENTS Imaging of NET requires the combined use of various methods such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, and PET/CT to enable accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS SSR-PET/CT is a valuable tool for the accurate staging of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, especially with small metastases, while MRI with hepatocyte-specific contrast agent and diffusion-weighted imaging is useful for the specific assessment of liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ebner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| | - J Rübenthaler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - J Ricke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - G T Sheikh
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - L M Unterrainer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - C J Auernhammer
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - C Spitzweg
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - M Brendel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - C Schmid-Tannwald
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - C C Cyran
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Unterrainer LM, Memarzadeh S, Moatamed NA, Benz MR, Czernin J, Calais J. [ 68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET in a Borderline Ovarian Tumor. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:820-821. [PMID: 38212069 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Unterrainer
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sanaz Memarzadeh
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Dentistry and Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Molecular Biology Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Neda A Moatamed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Matthias R Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Unterrainer LM, Ruchalski K, Allen-Auerbach MS, Calais J, Benz MR. PSMA PET/CT Dual-Time-Point Imaging: Nice to Have or Need to Have? J Nucl Med 2024; 65:818-819. [PMID: 38176724 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Unterrainer
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Martin S Allen-Auerbach
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias R Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California; and
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Unterrainer LM, Eismann L, Lindner S, Gildehaus FJ, Toms J, Casuscelli J, Holzgreve A, Kunte SC, Cyran CC, Menold P, Karl A, Unterrainer M, Ledderose ST, Stief CG, Bartenstein P, Kretschmer A, Schulz GB. [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for locoregional lymph node staging in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder prior to cystectomy: initial experiences from a pilot analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1786-1789. [PMID: 38236427 PMCID: PMC11043110 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06595-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT is a novel hybrid imaging method that previously showed additional diagnostic value in the assessment of distant urothelial carcinoma lesions. We hypothesized that patients with bladder cancer benefit from [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT prior to radical cystectomy for locoregional lymph node staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighteen patients underwent [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for evaluation of lymph node (LN) status in predefined LN regions. Two hundred twenty-nine intraoperatively removed LN served as histopathological reference standard. RESULTS Urothelial carcinoma (UC) spread was found in ten LN in seven different regions (14.3%). Hereby, [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT was positive in four out of seven regions (57.1%) and showed significantly increased FAPI uptake compared to non-pathological regions. In the remaining three out of seven (42.9%) regions, [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT was rated negative since no pathological increased FAPI uptake was detected or the proximity of the urinary tract prevented a differentiation from physiological uptake. CT was inconspicuous in these three regions. In total, two FAP-positive LN regions were found without histopathological counterpart. Overall, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 57.1%, 95.2%, 66.7%, and 93.0% for PET imaging. CONCLUSION In summary, this innovative [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT method showed high specificity and negative predictive value in patients with bladder UC with a future potential to optimize therapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Lennert Eismann
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franz-Josef Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Toms
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie C Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paula Menold
- Department of Urology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Karl
- Department of Urology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Die RADIOLOGIE, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Kretschmer
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Janssen Research and Development, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Gerald B Schulz
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tamalunas A, Aydogdu C, Unterrainer LM, Schott M, Rodler S, Ledderose S, Schulz GB, Stief CG, Casuscelli J. The Vanishing Clinical Value of PD-L1 Status as a Predictive Biomarker in the First-Line Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1536. [PMID: 38672618 PMCID: PMC11049370 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study endeavors to elucidate the clinical implications of PD-L1 positivity in individuals afflicted with advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). METHODS Patients with advanced UCB were prospectively enrolled following a radical cystectomy (RC) performed within January 2017 to December 2022 at our tertiary referral center. The clinical outcome, defined as the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on systemic treatment, was analyzed using an χ2-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, the Kaplan-Meier method, and a log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 648 patients were included following an RC performed within January 2017 to December 2022. Their PD-L1 status was analyzed with the primary PD-L1-specific antibody (clone SP263, Ventana) and defined both by the CPS and IC-score in 282 patients (43.5%) with a high risk (pT3-pT4 and/or lymph node involvement) or metastatic UCB. While the median PFS was significantly prolonged 5-fold in PD-L1+ patients, we found no difference in OS, regardless of PD-L1 status, or treatment regimen. CONCLUSIONS While PD-L1 positivity indicates prolonged PFS, the presence of PD-L1 does not influence OS rates, suggesting its limited usefulness as a prognostic biomarker in bladder cancer. However, the positive correlation between an PD-L1 status and a sustained response to ICI treatments indicates its potential role as a predictive biomarker. Further research is required to understand how the predictive value of PD-L1 positivity may extend to the use of ICIs in combination with antibody-drug conjugates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Tamalunas
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (C.A.); (M.S.); (S.R.); (G.B.S.); (C.G.S.); (J.C.)
| | - Can Aydogdu
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (C.A.); (M.S.); (S.R.); (G.B.S.); (C.G.S.); (J.C.)
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Melanie Schott
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (C.A.); (M.S.); (S.R.); (G.B.S.); (C.G.S.); (J.C.)
| | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (C.A.); (M.S.); (S.R.); (G.B.S.); (C.G.S.); (J.C.)
| | - Stephan Ledderose
- Department of Pathology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Gerald B. Schulz
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (C.A.); (M.S.); (S.R.); (G.B.S.); (C.G.S.); (J.C.)
| | - Christian G. Stief
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (C.A.); (M.S.); (S.R.); (G.B.S.); (C.G.S.); (J.C.)
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (C.A.); (M.S.); (S.R.); (G.B.S.); (C.G.S.); (J.C.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burkhard-Meier A, Jurinovic V, Berclaz LM, Albertsmeier M, Dürr HR, Klein A, Knösel T, Di Gioia D, Unterrainer LM, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Ricke J, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Kunz WG, Lindner LH. Differentiation of benign and metastatic lymph nodes in soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Exp Metastasis 2024; 41:131-141. [PMID: 38421522 PMCID: PMC10973039 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-024-10273-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) occurs in less than 5% of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients and indicates an aggressive course of disease. Suspicious lymph nodes (LN) in staging imaging are a frequent topic of discussion in multidisciplinary tumor boards. Predictive markers are needed to facilitate stratification and improve treatment of STS patients. In this study, 56 STS patients with radiologically suspicious and subsequently histologically examined LN were reviewed. Patients with benign (n = 26) and metastatic (n = 30) LN were analyzed with regard to clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters. Patients with LNM exhibited significantly larger short axis diameter (SAD) and long axis diameter (LAD) vs. patients with benign LN (median 22.5 vs. 14 mm, p < 0.001 and median 29.5 vs. 21 mm, p = 0.003, respectively). Furthermore, the presence of central necrosis and high maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in FDG-PET-CT scans were significantly associated with LNM (60 vs. 11.5% of patients, p < 0.001 and median 8.59 vs. 3.96, p = 0.013, respectively). With systemic therapy, a slight median size regression over time was observed in both metastatic and benign LN. Serum LDH and CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with LNM (median 247 vs. 187.5U/L, p = 0.005 and 1.5 vs. 0.55 mg/dL, p = 0.039, respectively). This study shows significant associations between LNM and imaging features as well as laboratory parameters of STS patients. The largest SAD, SUVmax in FDG-PET-CT scan, the presence of central necrosis, and high serum LDH level are the most important parameters to distinguish benign from metastatic LNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vindi Jurinovic
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luc M Berclaz
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Albertsmeier
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Roland Dürr
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Klein
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Knösel
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorit Di Gioia
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lars H Lindner
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gacula SIG, Kunte SC, Unterrainer LM, Rübenthaler J, Kunz WG, Cyran C, Holzgreve A. Correction: Divergent growth on [18F]FDG PET/CT in a case of co-existing pulmonary metastatic leiomyosarcoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma. Nuklearmedizin 2024. [PMID: 38527463 DOI: 10.1055/a-2286-9571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Ira G Gacula
- Department of Medical Imaging and Therapeutic Radiology, National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Manila, Philippines
| | - Sophie C Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liubchenko G, Böning G, Zacherl M, Rumiantcev M, Unterrainer LM, Gildehaus FJ, Brendel M, Resch S, Bartenstein P, Ziegler SI, Delker A. Image-based dosimetry for [ 225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy and the effect of daughter-specific pharmacokinetics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06681-2. [PMID: 38512484 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06681-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although 221Fr and 213Bi have sufficient gamma emission probabilities, quantitative SPECT after [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy remains challenging due to low therapeutic activities. Furthermore, 221Fr and 213Bi may underlie a different pharmacokinetics due to alpha recoil. We conducted a quantitative SPECT study and a urine analysis to investigate the pharmacokinetics of 221Fr and 213Bi and the impact on image-based lesion and kidney dosimetry. METHODS Five patients (7.7 ± 0.2 MBq [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T) underwent an abdominal SPECT/CT (1 h) at 24 and 48 h (Siemens Symbia T2, high-energy collimator, 440 keV/218 keV (width 20%), 78 keV (width 50%)). Quantitative SPECT was reconstructed using MAP-EM with attenuation and transmission-dependent scatter corrections and resolution modelling. Time-activity curves for kidneys (CT-based) and lesions (80% isocontour 24 h) were fitted mono-exponentially. Urine samples collected along with each SPECT/CT were measured in a gamma counter until secular equilibrium was reached. RESULTS Mean kidney and lesion effective half-lives were as follows: 213Bi, 27 ± 6/38 ± 10 h; 221Fr, 24 ± 6/38 ± 11 h; 78 keV, 23 ± 7/39 ± 13 h. The 213Bi-to-221Fr kidney SUV ratio increased by an average of 9% from 24 to 48 h. Urine analysis revealed an increasing 213Bi-to-225Ac ratio (24 h, 0.98 ± 0.15; 48 h, 1.08 ± 0.09). Mean kidney and lesion absorbed doses were 0.17 ± 0.06 and 0.36 ± 0.1 Sv RBE = 5 /MBq using 221Fr and 213Bi SPECT images, compared to 0.16 ± 0.05/0.18 ± 0.06 and 0.36 ± 0.1/0.38 ± 0.1 Sv RBE = 5 /MBq considering either the 221Fr or 213Bi SPECT. CONCLUSION SPECT/CT imaging and urine analysis showed minor differences of up to 10% in the daughter-specific pharmacokinetics. These variances had a minimal impact on the lesion and kidney dosimetry which remained within 8%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigory Liubchenko
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Mikhail Rumiantcev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Franz Josef Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- SyNergy, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- DZNE - German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany
| | - Sandra Resch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Sibylle I Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninstrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gacula SIG, Kunte SC, Unterrainer LM, Rübenthaler J, Kunz WG, Cyran C, Holzgreve A. Divergent growth on [18F]FDG PET/CT in a case of co-existing pulmonary metastatic leiomyosarcoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma. Nuklearmedizin 2024. [PMID: 38467142 DOI: 10.1055/a-2273-2447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Ira G Gacula
- Department of Medical Imaging and Therapeutic Radiology, National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Manila, Philippines
| | - Sophie C Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Farolfi A, Armstrong WR, Djaileb L, Gafita A, Hotta M, Allen-Auerbach M, Unterrainer LM, Fendler WP, Rettig M, Eiber M, Hofman MS, Hadaschik B, Herrmann K, Czernin J, Calais J, Benz MR. Differences and Common Ground in 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Practice Patterns: International Survey of 95 Theranostic Centers. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:438-445. [PMID: 38238041 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy effectively treats metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients requiring treatment, and consequently the number of theranostic centers, are expected to increase significantly after Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval. This requires standardization or harmonization among theranostic centers. The aim of this study was to assess operational differences and similarities among 177Lu-PSMA treatment centers. Methods: A questionnaire comprising 62 items, designed by a core team of 5 physicians and externally reviewed by international experts, was developed. Study participants were asked to provide answers about their center, patient selection, radiopharmaceuticals, clinical assessment before and after 177Lu-PSMA treatments, laboratory values, treatment discontinuation, posttreatment imaging, and general information. An invitation e-mail to participate in the study was sent in June 2022. Duplicates were removed to allow for only one valid response per center. Results: Ninety-five of 211 (45%) contacted centers completed the questionnaire. Most participating centers were in Europe (51%), followed by America (22%) and Asia (22%). During the 12 mo before this study, a total of 5,906 patients received 177Lu-PSMA therapy at the 95 participating centers. Most of these patients were treated in Europe (2,840/5,906; 48%), followed by Asia (1,313/5,906; 22%) and Oceania (1,225/5,906; 21%). PSMA PET eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA was determined most frequently using 68Ga-PSMA-11 (77%). Additional pretherapy imaging included 18F-FDG PET/CT, CT, renal scintigraphy, and bone scintigraphy at 41 (49%), 27 (32%), 25 (30%), and 13 (15%), respectively, of the 84 centers for clinical standard of care, compassionate care, or local research protocols and 11 (26%), 25 (60%), 9 (21%), and 28 (67%), respectively, of the 42 centers for industry-sponsored trials. PSMA PET eligibility criteria included subjective qualitative assessment of PSMA positivity at 33% of centers, VISION criteria at 23%, and TheraP criteria at 13%. The mean standard injected activity per cycle was 7.3 GBq (range, 5.5-11.1 GBq). Sixty-two (65%) centers applied standardized response assessment criteria, and PSMA PET Progression Criteria were the most applied (37%). Conclusion: Results from this international survey revealed interinstitutional differences in several aspects of 177Lu-PSMA radionuclide therapy, including patient selection, administered activity, and the response assessment strategy. Standardization or harmonization of protocols and dedicated training are desirable in anticipation of increasing numbers of patients and theranostic centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Farolfi
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Wesley R Armstrong
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Loic Djaileb
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- LRB, Nuclear Medicine Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, University of Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, Grenoble, France
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Masatoshi Hotta
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Martin Allen-Auerbach
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthew Rettig
- Department of Medicine and Urology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias R Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grawe F, Blom F, Winkelmann M, Burgard C, Schmid-Tannwald C, Unterrainer LM, Sheikh GT, Pfitzinger PL, Kazmierczak P, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Stief CG, Bartenstein P, Ruebenthaler J, Fabritius MP, Geyer T. Reliability and practicability of PSMA-RADS 1.0 for structured reporting of PSMA-PET/CT scans in prostate cancer patients. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:1157-1166. [PMID: 37624414 PMCID: PMC10853294 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10083-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As structured reporting is increasingly used in the evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) for prostate cancer, there is a need to assess the reliability of these frameworks. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interreader agreement among readers with varying levels of experience using PSMA-RADS 1.0 for interpreting PSMA-PET/CT scans, even when blinded to clinical data, and therefore to determine the feasibility of implementing this reporting system in clinical practice. METHODS PSMA-PET/CT scans of 103 patients were independently evaluated by 4 readers with different levels of experience according to the reporting and data system (RADS) for PSMA-PET/CT imaging PSMA-RADS 1.0 at 2 time points within 6 weeks. For each scan, a maximum of five target lesions were freely chosen and stratified according to PSMA-RADS 1.0. Overall scan score and compartment-based scores were assessed. Intra- and interreader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS PSMA-RADS 1.0 demonstrated excellent interreader agreement for both overall scan scores (ICC ≥ 0.91) and compartment-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.93) across all four readers. The framework showed excellent intrareader agreement for overall scan scores (ICC ≥ 0.86) and compartment-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.95), even among readers with varying levels of experience. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a reliable method for assessing PSMA-PET/CT with strong consistency and agreement among readers. It shows great potential for establishing a standard approach to diagnosing and planning treatment for prostate cancer patients, and can be used confidently even by readers with less experience. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This study underlines that PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a valuable and highly reliable scoring system for PSMA-PET/CT scans of prostate cancer patients and can be used confidently by radiologists with different levels of experience in routine clinical practice. KEY POINTS PSMA-RADS version 1.0 is a scoring system for PSMA-PET/CT scans. Its reproducibility needs to be analyzed in order to make it applicable to clinical practice. Excellent interreader and intrareader agreement for overall scan scores and compartment-based scores using PSMA-RADS 1.0 were seen in readers with varying levels of experience. PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a reliable tool for accurately diagnosing and planning treatment for prostate cancer patients, and can be used confidently in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freba Grawe
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Blom
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Caroline Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Str., Geb. 50, 66421, Homburg, Germany
| | - Christine Schmid-Tannwald
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriel T Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Paulo L Pfitzinger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Str., Geb. 50, 66421, Homburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Kazmierczak
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Ruebenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias P Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Unterrainer LM, Calais J, Bander NH. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Gateway to Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Annu Rev Med 2024; 75:49-66. [PMID: 38285513 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-081522-031439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as a transmembrane protein is overexpressed by prostate cancer (PC) cells and is accessible for binding antibodies or low-molecular-weight radioligands due to its extracellular portion. Successful targeting of PSMA began with the development of humanized J591 antibody. Due to their faster clearance compared to antibodies, small-molecule radioligands for targeted imaging and therapy of PC have been favored in recent development efforts. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has higher diagnostic performance than conventional imaging for initial staging of high-risk PC and biochemical recurrence detection/localization. However, it remains to be demonstrated how to integrate PSMA PET imaging for therapy response assessment and as an outcome endpoint measure in clinical trials. With the recent approval of 177Lu-PSMA-617 by the US Food and Drug Administration for metastatic castration-resistant PC progressing after chemotherapy, the high value of PSMA-targeted therapy was confirmed. Compared to standard of care, PSMA-based radioligand therapy led to a better outcome and a higher quality of life. This review, focusing on the advanced PC setting, provides an overview of different approved and nonapproved PSMA-targeted imaging and therapeutic modalities and discusses the future of PSMA-targeted theranostics, also with an outlook on non-radiopharmaceutical-based PSMA-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Unterrainer
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; ,
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; ,
| | - Neil H Bander
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA;
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gold L, Barci E, Brendel M, Orth M, Cheng J, Kirchleitner SV, Bartos LM, Pötter D, Kirchner MA, Unterrainer LM, Kaiser L, Ziegler S, Weidner L, Riemenschneider MJ, Unterrainer M, Belka C, Tonn JC, Bartenstein P, Niyazi M, von Baumgarten L, Kälin RE, Glass R, Lauber K, Albert NL, Holzgreve A. The Traumatic Inoculation Process Affects TSPO Radioligand Uptake in Experimental Orthotopic Glioblastoma. Biomedicines 2024; 12:188. [PMID: 38255293 PMCID: PMC10813339 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The translocator protein (TSPO) has been proven to have great potential as a target for the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of glioblastoma. However, there is an ongoing debate about the potential various sources of the TSPO PET signal. This work investigates the impact of the inoculation-driven immune response on the PET signal in experimental orthotopic glioblastoma. METHODS Serial [18F]GE-180 and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET scans were performed at day 7/8 and day 14/15 after the inoculation of GL261 mouse glioblastoma cells (n = 24) or saline (sham, n = 6) into the right striatum of immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. An additional n = 25 sham mice underwent [18F]GE-180 PET and/or autoradiography (ARG) at days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 50 and 90 in order to monitor potential reactive processes that were solely related to the inoculation procedure. In vivo imaging results were directly compared to tissue-based analyses including ARG and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS We found that the inoculation process represents an immunogenic event, which significantly contributes to TSPO radioligand uptake. [18F]GE-180 uptake in GL261-bearing mice surpassed [18F]FET uptake both in the extent and the intensity, e.g., mean target-to-background ratio (TBRmean) in PET at day 7/8: 1.22 for [18F]GE-180 vs. 1.04 for [18F]FET, p < 0.001. Sham mice showed increased [18F]GE-180 uptake at the inoculation channel, which, however, continuously decreased over time (e.g., TBRmean in PET: 1.20 at day 7 vs. 1.09 at day 35, p = 0.04). At the inoculation channel, the percentage of TSPO/IBA1 co-staining decreased, whereas TSPO/GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) co-staining increased over time (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION We identify the inoculation-driven immune response to be a relevant contributor to the PET signal and add a new aspect to consider for planning PET imaging studies in orthotopic glioblastoma models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Gold
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
| | - Enio Barci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
- Neurosurgical Research, Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Orth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jiying Cheng
- Neurosurgical Research, Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina V. Kirchleitner
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Laura M. Bartos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
| | - Dennis Pötter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
| | - Maximilian A. Kirchner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
| | - Sibylle Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
| | - Lorraine Weidner
- Department of Neuropathology, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
- DIE RADIOLOGIE, 80331 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Roland E. Kälin
- Neurosurgical Research, Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rainer Glass
- Neurosurgical Research, Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bui VN, Unterrainer LM, Brendel M, Kunte SC, Holzgreve A, Allmendinger F, Bartenstein P, Klauschen F, Unterrainer M, Staehler M, Ledderose S. PSMA-Expression Is Highly Associated with Histological Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Potential Implications for Theranostic Approaches. Biomedicines 2023; 11:3095. [PMID: 38002095 PMCID: PMC10668989 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11113095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In renal cell carcinoma (RCC), accurate imaging methods are required for treatment planning and response assessment to therapy. In addition, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic options, especially in metastatic RCC. One way to combine diagnostics and therapy in a so-called theranostic approach is the use of radioligands directed against surface antigens. For instance, radioligands against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have already been successfully used for diagnosis and radionuclide therapy of metastatic prostate cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that PSMA is expressed not only in prostate cancer but also in the neovasculature of several solid tumors, which has raised hopes to use PSMA-guided theranostic approaches in other tumor entities, too. However, data on PSMA expression in different histopathological subtypes of RCC are sparse. Because a better understanding of PSMA expression in RCC is critical to assess which patients would benefit most from theranostic approaches using PSMA-targeted ligands, we investigated the expression pattern of PSMA in different subtypes of RCC on protein level. Immunohistochemical staining for PSMA was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival material of major different histological subtypes of RCC (clear cell RCC (ccRCC)), papillary RCC (pRCC) and chromophobe RCC (cpRCC). The extent and intensity of PSMA staining were scored semi-quantitatively and correlated with the histological RCC subtypes. Group comparisons were calculated with the Kruskal-Wallis test. In all cases, immunoreactivity was detected only in the tumor-associated vessels and not in tumor cells. Staining intensity was the strongest in ccRCC, followed by cpRCC and pRCC. ccRCC showed the most diffuse staining pattern, followed by cpRCC and pRCC. Our results provide a rationale for PSMA-targeted theranostic approaches in ccRCC and cpRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinh Ngoc Bui
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie C. Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Fabian Allmendinger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | | | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
- Die RADIOLOGIE, 80331 Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Stephan Ledderose
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.K.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Unterrainer M, Kunte SC, Unterrainer LM, Holzgreve A, Delker A, Lindner S, Beyer L, Brendel M, Kunz WG, Winkelmann M, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Belka C, Niyazi M, Tonn JC, Bartenstein P, Albert NL. Correction to: Next‑generation PET/CT imaging in meningioma-first clinical experiences using the novel SSTR‑targeting peptide [ 18F]SiTATE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:4115. [PMID: 37642707 PMCID: PMC10611856 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06409-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sophie C Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Carmen Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Björn Wängler
- Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sonni I, Gafita A, Unterrainer LM, Alano RM, Lira S, Shen J, Drakaki A, Grogan T, Rettig MB, Czernin J, Calais J. Effects of novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors on PSMA PET signal intensity in patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a prospective exploratory serial imaging study. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:95. [PMID: 37902861 PMCID: PMC10616012 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01048-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PSMA expression is influenced by hormonal status. We evaluated changes in PSA and whole-body 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (WB-PSMA PET) after initiation of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi). METHODS Prospectively enrolled patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) initiating ARSi underwent serial PSA measurements and WB-PSMA PET at baseline, 1-week, and 3-months post-ARSi. We correlated WB-PSMA PET metrics and PSA kinetics after ARSi to 1-year clinical outcome. RESULTS Due to low enrollment rate, the study was closed before reaching the recruitment goal of 30 patients. Nine patients were enrolled. At 1-year, unfavorable outcome was documented in 6/9 (66%) patients. Nine/9 patients completed PSMA PET at 1-week, 5/9 at 3-months. Changes in PSA, PSMA-VOL, SUVmean and SUVmax were - 12%, + 5%, + 3%, and + 10% at 1-week, - 42%, - 16%, - 15% and - 17% at 3-months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our prospective trial involving 9 mCRPC patients initiating ARSi did not show significant modulation of PSMA expression measured on WB-PSMA PET at 1-week. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04279561).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Sonni
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7370, USA.
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Rejah M Alano
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Lira
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Shen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tristan Grogan
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kunte SC, Schwarting SK, Holzgreve A, Wöhrle C, Unterrainer M, Bartenstein P, Unterrainer LM. Divergent Findings in the Diagnosis of ATTR-CM Using Common Cardiac Diagnostics and 99m Tc-DPD Scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:888-889. [PMID: 37586093 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A 77-year-old man presented with progressive deterioration of physical capacity after successful percutaneous coronary intervention of known chronic coronary syndrome. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed hypertrophy of the left ventricle, and electrocardiogram showed low QRS voltage in all leads. 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy was conducted to differentiate etiology such as amyloidosis and revealed increased cardiac tracer uptake in the left (grade 3) and right ventricle. Immunofixation showed no signs of paraproteinemia or Bence-Jones proteinuria. Thus, biventricular involvement of ATTR-cardiomyopathy was identified by 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy. This approach should be considered if hypertrophic phenotype is present in patients with persistent deterioration of physical capacity not attributable to coronary artery disease.
Collapse
|
21
|
Albert NL, Nelwan DV, Fleischmann DF, Quach S, von Rohr K, Kaiser L, Teske N, Unterrainer LM, Bartos LM, Ruf VC, Brendel M, Riemenschneider MJ, Wetzel C, Herms J, Rupprecht R, Thon N, Tonn JC, Belka C, Bartenstein P, von Baumgarten L, Niyazi M, Unterrainer M, Holzgreve A. Prognostic Value of TSPO PET Before Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed IDH-Wild-Type Glioblastoma. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1519-1525. [PMID: 37536737 PMCID: PMC10586482 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) is gaining recognition as a relevant target in glioblastoma imaging. However, data on the potential prognostic value of TSPO PET imaging in glioblastoma are lacking. Therefore, we investigated the association of TSPO PET imaging results with survival outcome in a homogeneous cohort of glioblastoma patients. Methods: Patients were included who had newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild-type glioblastoma with available TSPO PET before either normofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide or hypofractionated radiotherapy. SUVmax on TSPO PET, TSPO binding affinity status, tumor volumes on MRI, and further clinical data, such as O 6-alkylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene promoter mutation status, were correlated with patient survival. Results: Forty-five patients (median age, 63.3 y) were included. Median SUVmax was 2.2 (range, 1.0-4.7). A TSPO PET signal was associated with survival: High uptake intensity (SUVmax > 2.2) was related to significantly shorter overall survival (OS; 8.3 vs. 17.8 mo, P = 0.037). Besides SUVmax, prognostic factors for OS were age (P = 0.046), MGMT promoter methylation status (P = 0.032), and T2-weighted MRI volume (P = 0.031). In the multivariate survival analysis, SUVmax in TSPO PET remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.023), with a hazard ratio of 2.212 (95% CI, 1.115-4.386) for death in cases with a high TSPO PET signal (SUVmax > 2.2). Conclusion: A high TSPO PET signal before radiotherapy is associated with significantly shorter survival in patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wild-type glioblastoma. TSPO PET seems to add prognostic insights beyond established clinical parameters and might serve as an informative tool as clinicians make survival predictions for patients with glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Debie V Nelwan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Quach
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina von Rohr
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Teske
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura M Bartos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktoria C Ruf
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- SyNergy, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christian Wetzel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; and
| | - Jochen Herms
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- SyNergy, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany
| | - Rainer Rupprecht
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; and
| | - Niklas Thon
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- SyNergy, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Holzgreve A, Unterrainer M, Calais J, Adams T, Oprea-Lager DE, Goffin K, Lopci E, Unterrainer LM, Kramer KKM, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Casuscelli J, Stief CG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Kunz WG, Mehrens D. Is PSMA PET/CT cost-effective for the primary staging in prostate cancer? First results for European countries and the USA based on the proPSMA trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3750-3754. [PMID: 37428216 PMCID: PMC10547650 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06332-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The proPSMA trial at ten Australian centers demonstrated increased sensitivity and specificity for PSMA PET/CT compared to conventional imaging regarding metastatic status in primary high-risk prostate cancer patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed benefits of PSMA PET/CT over conventional imaging for the Australian setting. However, comparable data for other countries are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to verify the cost-effectiveness of PSMA PET/CT in several European countries as well as the USA. METHODS Clinical data on diagnostic accuracy were derived from the proPSMA trial. Costs for PSMA PET/CT and conventional imaging were taken from reimbursements of national health systems and individual billing information of selected centers in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the USA. For comparability, scan duration and the decision tree of the analysis were adopted from the Australian cost-effectiveness study. RESULTS In contrast to the Australian setting, PSMA PET/CT was primarily associated with increased costs in the studied centers in Europe and the USA. Mainly, the scan duration had an impact on the cost-effectiveness. However, costs for an accurate diagnosis using PSMA PET/CT seemed reasonably low compared to the potential consequential costs of an inaccurate diagnosis. CONCLUSION We assume that the use of PSMA PET/CT is appropriate from a health economic perspective, but this will need to be verified by a prospective evaluation of patients at initial diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jérémie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Thaiza Adams
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kristina K M Kramer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Mehrens
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Unterrainer LM, Sisk AE, Czernin J, Shuch BM, Calais J, Hotta M. [ 68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET for Visualization of Postinfarction Renal Fibrosis. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1660-1661. [PMID: 37321822 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Unterrainer
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anthony E Sisk
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brian M Shuch
- Department of Urology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Masatoshi Hotta
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Unterrainer M, Kunte SC, Unterrainer LM, Holzgreve A, Delker A, Lindner S, Beyer L, Brendel M, Kunz WG, Winkelmann M, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Belka C, Niyazi M, Tonn JC, Bartenstein P, Albert NL. Next-generation PET/CT imaging in meningioma-first clinical experiences using the novel SSTR-targeting peptide [ 18F]SiTATE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3390-3399. [PMID: 37358620 PMCID: PMC10541820 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06315-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT provides important clinical information in addition to standard imaging in meningioma patients. [18F]SiTATE is a novel, 18F-labeled SSTR-targeting peptide with superior imaging properties according to preliminary data. We provide the first [18F]SiTATE PET/CT data of a large cohort of meningioma patients. METHODS Patients with known or suspected meningioma undergoing [18F]SiTATE PET/CT were included. Uptake intensity (SUV) of meningiomas, non-meningioma lesions, and healthy organs were assessed using a 50% isocontour volume of interest (VOI) or a spherical VOI, respectively. Also, trans-osseous extension on PET/CT was assessed. RESULTS A total of 107 patients with 117 [18F]SiTATE PET/CT scans were included. Overall, 231 meningioma lesions and 61 non-meningioma lesions (e.g., post-therapeutic changes) were analyzed. Physiological uptake was lowest in healthy brain tissue, followed by bone marrow, parotid, and pituitary (SUVmean 0.06 ± 0.04 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 1.0 vs. 9.8 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). Meningiomas showed significantly higher uptake than non-meningioma lesions (SUVmax 11.6 ± 10.6 vs. 4.0 ± 3.3, p < 0.001). Meningiomas showed significantly higher uptake than non-meningioma lesions (SUVmax 11.6±10.6 vs. 4.0±3.3, p<0.001). 93/231 (40.3%) meningiomas showed partial trans-osseous extension and 34/231 (14.7%) predominant intra-osseous extension. 59/231 (25.6%) meningioma lesions found on PET/CT had not been reported on previous standard imaging. CONCLUSION This is the first PET/CT study using an 18F-labeled SSTR-ligand in meningioma patients: [18F]SiTATE provides extraordinary contrast in meningioma compared to healthy tissue and non-meningioma lesions, which leads to a high detection rate of so far unknown meningioma sites and osseous involvement. Having in mind the advantageous logistic features of 18F-labeled compared to 68Ga-labeled compounds (e.g., longer half-life and large-badge production), [18F]SiTATE has the potential to foster a widespread use of SSTR-targeted imaging in neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sophie C Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Carmen Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Björn Wängler
- Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Holzgreve A, Taugner J, Käsmann L, Müller P, Tufman A, Reinmuth N, Li M, Winkelmann M, Unterrainer LM, Nieto AE, Bartenstein P, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Belka C, Eze C, Unterrainer M, Manapov F. Metabolic patterns on [ 18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC undergoing chemoradiotherapy ± durvalumab maintenance treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2466-2476. [PMID: 36951991 PMCID: PMC10250493 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06192-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), durvalumab maintenance treatment after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improves survival. So far, however, metabolic changes of tumoral lesions and secondary lymphoid organs under durvalumab are unknown. Hence, we assessed changes on [18F]FDG PET/CT in comparison to patients undergoing CRT alone. METHODS Forty-three patients with [18F]FDG PET/CT both before and after standard CRT for unresectable stage III NSCLC were included, in 16/43 patients durvalumab maintenance treatment was initiated (CRT-IO) prior to the second PET/CT. Uptake of tumor sites and secondary lymphoid organs was compared between CRT and CRT-IO. Also, readers were blinded for durvalumab administration and reviewed scans for findings suspicious for immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAE). RESULTS Initial uptake characteristics were comparable. However, under durvalumab, diverging metabolic patterns were noted: There was a significantly higher reduction of tumoral uptake intensity in CRT-IO compared to CRT, e.g. median decrease of SUVmax -70.0% vs. -24.8%, p = 0.009. In contrast, the spleen uptake increased in CRT-IO while it dropped in CRT (median + 12.5% vs. -4.4%, p = 0.029). Overall survival was significantly longer in CRT-IO compared to CRT with few events (progression/death) noted in CRT-IO. Findings suggestive of irAE were present on PET/CT more often in CRT-IO (12/16) compared to CRT (8/27 patients), p = 0.005. CONCLUSION Durvalumab maintenance treatment after CRT leads to diverging tumoral metabolic changes, but also increases splenic metabolism and leads to a higher proportion of findings suggestive of irAE compared to patients without durvalumab. Due to significantly prolonged survival with durvalumab, survival analysis will be substantiated in correlation to metabolic changes as soon as more clinical events are present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Julian Taugner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Müller
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander E Nieto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Delker A, Schleske M, Liubchenko G, Berg I, Zacherl MJ, Brendel M, Gildehaus FJ, Rumiantcev M, Resch S, Hürkamp K, Wenter V, Unterrainer LM, Bartenstein P, Ziegler SI, Beyer L, Böning G. Biodistribution and dosimetry for combined [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T/[ 225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy using multi-isotope quantitative SPECT imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1280-1290. [PMID: 36629878 PMCID: PMC10027798 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06092-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Quantitative SPECT for patient-specific dosimetry is a valuable tool in the scope of radionuclide therapy, although its clinical application for 225Ac-based treatments may be limited due to low therapeutic activities. Therefore, the aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of clinical quantitative low-count SPECT imaging during [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T/[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T treatment. METHODS Eight prostate cancer patients (1000 MBq/8 MBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T/[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T) received a single-bed quantitative 177Lu/225Ac SPECT/CT acquisition (1 h) at 24 h post treatment (high-energy collimator, 16 projections p. head à 3.5 min, 128 × 128 pixel). The gamma peak at 440 keV (width: 10%) of the progeny 213Bi was imaged along with the peak at 208 keV (width: 15%) of 177Lu. Quantification included CT-based attenuation and window-based scatter correction plus resolution modelling. Gaussian post-filtering with a full-width-half-maximum of 30 mm and 40-45 mm was employed to match the signal-to-noise ratio of 225Ac and 177Lu, respectively. RESULTS Kidney (r = 0.96, p < 0.01) and lesion (r = 0.94, p < 0.01) SUV for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T showed a strong and significant correlation. Kidney SUV were significantly higher (p < 0.01) for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9), while for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T lesion SUV were significantly higher (p = 0.03; 1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 2.1 ± 1.5). For absorbed dose estimates, significant differences regarding the kidneys remained, while no significant differences for lesion dosimetry were found. CONCLUSION Quantitative low-count SPECT imaging of the peak at 440 keV during [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy is feasible. Multi-isotope imaging for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T/[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy indicates accumulation of free 213Bi in the kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Mirjam Schleske
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Grigory Liubchenko
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabella Berg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- SyNergy, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- DZNE - German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Mikhail Rumiantcev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sandra Resch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hürkamp
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sibylle I Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Holzgreve A, Dürr HR, Stäbler A, Kaemmerer M, Unterrainer LM, Tufman A, Manapov F, Kunz WG, Unterrainer M. Finger Pain as an Uncommon Primary Manifestation of Lung Carcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13050901. [PMID: 36900044 PMCID: PMC10001008 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
A 54-year-old patient presented with progressive pain for one month in the second finger of the right hand with an emphasis on the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a diffuse intraosseous lesion at the base of the middle phalanx with destruction of the cortical bone and extraosseous soft tissue. An expansively growing chondromatous bone tumor, e.g., a chondrosarcoma, was suspected. After incisional biopsy, the pathologic findings finally revealed, surprisingly, a metastasis of a poorly differentiated non-small cell adenocarcinoma of the lung. This case illustrates a rare but important differential diagnosis for painful finger lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4400-74665
| | - Hans Roland Dürr
- Musculoskeletal Oncology, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Stäbler
- Radiologische Praxis München Großhadern, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- DIE RADIOLOGIE, 80331 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Resch S, Takayama Fouladgar S, Zacherl M, Sheikh GT, Liubchenko G, Rumiantcev M, Unterrainer LM, Wenter V, Bartenstein P, Ziegler SI, Ilhan H, Beyer L, Böning G, Delker A. Investigation of image-based lesion and kidney dosimetry protocols for 177Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy with and without a late SPECT/CT acquisition. EJNMMI Phys 2023; 10:11. [PMID: 36757516 PMCID: PMC9911578 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00529-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 177Lu-PSMA therapy has been successfully used to prolong the survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patient-specific dosimetry based on serial quantitative SPECT/CT imaging can support the understanding of dose-effect relationships. However, multiple SPECT/CT measurements can be challenging for patients, which motivates the investigation of efficient sampling schedules and their impact on dosimetry. In this study, different time samplings with respect to the number and timing of SPECT/CT acquisitions with and without a late measurement were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 43 lesions and 10 kidneys of 5 patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy were investigated. Whole-body SPECT/CT measurements were performed at 1, 2, 3 and 7 days post-injection. For both lesions (isocontour-based segmentation) and kidneys (CT-based segmentation), a reference model was employed including all four time points. To identify the best-matching fit function out of a pre-defined set of models, visual inspection, coefficients of variation and sum of squared errors were considered as goodness-of-fit criteria. Biologically effective doses (BEDs) calculated with different time samplings (days 1, 2, 3/1, 2, 7/1, 3, 7/2, 3, 7 and 1, 2/1, 3/1, 7) were compared to the reference. RESULTS The best-fit function was found to be a mono-exponential model for lesions and a bi-exponential model with a population-based parameter and two free parameters for kidneys. The BEDs calculated with the time sampling 1, 3, 7 days showed the lowest deviations from the reference for lesions with 4 ± 5%. Without day 7, still 86% of all lesions showed deviations from the reference < 10%. The outlier deviations showed a positive correlation with the effective half-life of the respective lesions. For kidneys, including days 1, 2, 3 achieved the best results with 0 ± 1%. Generally, deviations for kidneys were found to be small for all time samplings (max. 13%). CONCLUSIONS For combined optimization of the SPECT/CT time sampling for kidney and lesion dosimetry during 177Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy, the sampling with days 1, 3, 7 showed the smallest deviation from the reference. Without a late acquisition, using the schedule with days 1, 2, 3 is likewise feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Resch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sarah Takayama Fouladgar
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Zacherl
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriel T. Sheikh
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Grigory Liubchenko
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mikhail Rumiantcev
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sibylle I. Ziegler
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eschbach RS, Hofmann M, Späth L, Sheikh GT, Delker A, Lindner S, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Tiling R, Brendel M, Wenter V, Dekorsy FJ, Zacherl MJ, Todica A, Ilhan H, Grawe F, Cyran CC, Unterrainer M, Rübenthaler J, Knösel T, Paul T, Boeck S, Westphalen CB, Spitzweg C, Auernhammer CJ, Bartenstein P, Unterrainer LM, Beyer L. Comparison of somatostatin receptor expression in patients with neuroendocrine tumours with and without somatostatin analogue treatment imaged with [ 18F]SiTATE. Front Oncol 2023; 13:992316. [PMID: 36793617 PMCID: PMC9924143 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.992316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are frequently used in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. Recently, [18F]SiTATE entered the field of somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the SSR-expression of differentiated gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) measured by [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT in patients with and without previous treatment with long-acting SSAs to evaluate if SSA treatment needs to be paused prior to [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT. Methods 77 patients were examined with standardised [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT within clinical routine: 40 patients with long-acting SSAs up to 28 days prior to PET/CT examination and 37 patients without pre-treatment with SSAs. Maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) of tumours and metastases (liver, lymphnode, mesenteric/peritoneal and bones) as well as representative background tissues (liver, spleen, adrenal gland, blood pool, small intestine, lung, bone) were measured, SUV ratios (SUVR) were calculated between tumours/metastases and liver, likewise between tumours/metastases and corresponding specific background, and compared between the two groups. Results SUVmean of liver (5.4 ± 1.5 vs. 6.8 ± 1.8) and spleen (17.5 ± 6.8 vs. 36.7 ± 10.3) were significantly lower (p < 0.001) and SUVmean of blood pool (1.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with SSA pre-treatment compared to patients without. No significant differences between tumour-to-liver and specific tumour-to-background SUVRs were observed between both groups (all p > 0.05). Conclusion In patients previously treated with SSAs, a significantly lower SSR expression ([18F]SiTATE uptake) in normal liver and spleen tissue was observed, as previously reported for 68Ga-labelled SSAs, without significant reduction of tumour-to-background contrast. Therefore, there is no evidence that SSA treatment needs to be paused prior to [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf S. Eschbach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Hofmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Späth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriel T. Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Carmen Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Björn Wängler
- Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Reinhold Tiling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska J. Dekorsy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J. Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Grawe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C. Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Knösel
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Tanja Paul
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Boeck
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Benedikt Westphalen
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph J. Auernhammer
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brosch-Lenz J, Delker A, Völter F, Unterrainer LM, Kaiser L, Bartenstein P, Ziegler S, Rahmim A, Uribe C, Böning G. Towards Single Time Point Image-Based Dosimetry of 177Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:767-774. [PMID: 36657980 PMCID: PMC10152120 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) with Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands have demonstrated promising results for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The lack of absorbed dose and effect relationships currently prevents from patient-specific activity personalization. To ease the implementation of dosimetry in routine clinic workflow of RPT, simplified methods such as single time point (STP) instead of multiple time point (MTP) imaging protocols are required. This work aims at assessing differences in time-integrated activity (TIA) of STP versus MTP image-based dosimetry for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. Methods: 20 mCRPC patients with MTP quantitative 177Lu-SPECT imaging data (~24h, 48h, 72h post administration) available on first and second 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy cycles were included in this study. Time-activity-curves were fitted for kidneys and lesions to derive effective half-lives and yield reference TIA. STP approaches involved the formula by Hänscheid (STPH) and a prior information method (STPprior) that uses the effective half-lives from the first therapy cycle. All time points were considered for the STP approaches. Percentage differences (PD) in TIA between STP and MTP was compared for the second therapy cycle. Results: Using STPH at 48h p.i. for the kidneys had -1.3±5.6% difference against MTP, while STPprior showed a PD of 4.6±6.2%. Smallest average differences for the 56 investigated individual lesions were found using the STPprior approach at 48h p.i. with only 0.4±14.9%, while STPH at 72h p.i. had smallest PD of -1.9±14.8%. Conclusion: STP dosimetry for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy using a single SPECT/CT at 48h or 72h is feasible with a difference of <±20% compared against MTP. Both, STPH and STPprior have demonstrated their validity. We believe this finding can increase the adoption of dosimetry and facilitate implementation in routine clinical RPT workflows. Doing so will ultimately enable the finding of dose-effective relationships based on fixed therapy activities that could in future allow for absorbed dose based RPT activity personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Brosch-Lenz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Canada
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Canada
| | - Friederike Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Canada
| | | | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Canada
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Canada
| | - Sibylle Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Canada
| | - Carlos Uribe
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Unterrainer LM, Todica A, Beyer L, Brendel M, Holzgreve A, Kauffmann-Guerrero D, Unterrainer M, Bartenstein P, Tufman A. 68Ga-EMP-100 PET/CT-a novel method for non-invasive assessment of c-MET expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:628-629. [PMID: 36253641 PMCID: PMC9816193 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05995-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- DIE RADIOLOGIE, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mehrens D, Kramer KKM, Unterrainer LM, Beyer L, Bartenstein P, Froelich MF, Tollens F, Ricke J, Rübenthaler J, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Herlemann A, Unterrainer M, Kunz WG. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:43-50.e2. [PMID: 36634610 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer poses a therapeutic challenge with poor prognosis. The VISION trial showed prolonged progression-free and overall survival in patients treated with lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan (177Lu-PSMA-617) radioligand therapy compared with using the standard of care (SoC) alone. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment compared with SoC therapy. METHODS A partitioned survival model was developed using data from the VISION trial, which included overall and progression-free survival and treatment regimens for 177Lu-PSMA-617 and SoC. Treatment costs, utilities for health states, and adverse events were derived from public databases and the literature. Because 177Lu-PSMA-617 was only recently approved, costs for treatment were extrapolated from 177Lu-DOTATATE. Outcome measurements included the incremental cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratio. The analysis was performed in a US setting from a healthcare system perspective over the lifetime horizon of 60 months. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set to $50,000, $100,000, and $200,000 per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS The 177Lu-PSMA-617 group was estimated to gain 0.42 incremental QALYs. Treatment using 177Lu-PSMA-617 led to an increase in costs compared with SoC ($169,110 vs $85,398). The incremental cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratio for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy was $200,708/QALYs. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the model regarding various parameters, which remained cost-effective at all lower and upper parameter bounds. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations, therapy using 177Lu-PSMA-617 was determined as the cost-effective strategy in 37.14% of all iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $200,000/QALYs. CONCLUSIONS Treatment using 177Lu-PSMA-617 was estimated to add a notable clinical benefit over SoC alone. Based on the model results, radioligand therapy represents a treatment strategy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with cost-effectiveness in certain scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Mehrens
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias F Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Fabian Tollens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Li Z, Holzgreve A, Unterrainer LM, Ruf VC, Quach S, Bartos LM, Suchorska B, Niyazi M, Wenter V, Herms J, Bartenstein P, Tonn JC, Unterrainer M, Albert NL, Kaiser L. Combination of pre-treatment dynamic [ 18F]FET PET radiomics and conventional clinical parameters for the survival stratification in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:535-545. [PMID: 36227357 PMCID: PMC9816231 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05988-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to build and evaluate a prediction model which incorporates clinical parameters and radiomic features extracted from static as well as dynamic [18F]FET PET for the survival stratification in patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. METHODS A total of 141 patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and dynamic [18F]FET PET prior to surgical intervention were included. Patients with a survival time ≤ 12 months were classified as short-term survivors. First order, shape, and texture radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment static (tumor-to-background ratio; TBR) and dynamic (time-to-peak; TTP) images, respectively, and randomly divided into a training (n = 99) and a testing cohort (n = 42). After feature normalization, recursive feature elimination was applied for feature selection using 5-fold cross-validation on the training cohort, and a machine learning model was constructed to compare radiomic models and combined clinical-radiomic models with selected radiomic features and clinical parameters. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated to assess the predictive performance for identifying short-term survivors in both the training and testing cohort. RESULTS A combined clinical-radiomic model comprising six clinical parameters and six selected dynamic radiomic features achieved highest predictability of short-term survival with an AUC of 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.88) in the independent testing cohort. CONCLUSIONS This study successfully built and evaluated prediction models using [18F]FET PET-based radiomic features and clinical parameters for the individualized assessment of short-term survival in patients with a newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. The combination of both clinical parameters and dynamic [18F]FET PET-based radiomic features reached highest accuracy in identifying patients at risk. Although the achieved accuracy level remained moderate, our data shows that the integration of dynamic [18F]FET PET radiomic data into clinical prediction models may improve patient stratification beyond established prognostic markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhicong Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktoria C Ruf
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Quach
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura M Bartos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sana Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Herms
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
von Rohr K, Unterrainer M, Holzgreve A, Kirchner MA, Li Z, Unterrainer LM, Suchorska B, Brendel M, Tonn JC, Bartenstein P, Ziegler S, Albert NL, Kaiser L. Can Radiomics Provide Additional Information in [18F]FET-Negative Gliomas? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194860. [PMID: 36230783 PMCID: PMC9612387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) complements standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) since it directly visualizes the increased amino acid transport into tumor cells. Amino acid PET using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) has proven to be relevant, for example, for glioma classification, identification of tumor progression or recurrence, or for the delineation of tumor extent. Nevertheless, a relevant proportion of low-grade gliomas (30%) and few high-grade gliomas (5%) were found to show no or even decreased amino acid uptake by conventional visual analysis of PET images. Advanced image analysis with the extraction of radiomic features is known to provide more detailed information on tumor characteristics than conventional analyses. Hence, this study aimed to investigate whether radiomic features derived from dynamic [18F]FET PET data differ between [18F]FET-negative glioma and healthy background and thus provide information that cannot be extracted by visual read. Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of extracting relevant information from radiomic features even in apparently [18F]FET-negative gliomas. A total of 46 patients with a newly diagnosed, histologically verified glioma that was visually classified as [18F]FET-negative were included. Tumor volumes were defined using routine T2/FLAIR MRI data and applied to extract information from dynamic [18F]FET PET data, i.e., early and late tumor-to-background (TBR5–15, TBR20–40) and time-to-peak (TTP) images. Radiomic features of healthy background were calculated from the tumor volume of interest mirrored in the contralateral hemisphere. The ability to distinguish tumors from healthy tissue was assessed using the Wilcoxon test and logistic regression. A total of 5, 15, and 69% of features derived from TBR20–40, TBR5–15, and TTP images, respectively, were significantly different. A high number of significantly different TTP features was even found in isometabolic gliomas (after exclusion of photopenic gliomas) with visually normal [18F]FET uptake in static images. However, the differences did not reach satisfactory predictability for machine-learning-based identification of tumor tissue. In conclusion, radiomic features derived from dynamic [18F]FET PET data may extract additional information even in [18F]FET-negative gliomas, which should be investigated in larger cohorts and correlated with histological and outcome features in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina von Rohr
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Zhicong Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 81377 Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sibylle Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Correspondence: (N.L.A.); (L.K.)
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: (N.L.A.); (L.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Unterrainer LM, Beyer L, Zacherl MJ, Gildehaus FJ, Todica A, Kunte SC, Holzgreve A, Sheikh GT, Herlemann A, Casuscelli J, Brendel M, Albert NL, Wenter V, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kunz WG, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Stief CG, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H, Unterrainer M. Total Tumor Volume on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET as Additional Imaging Biomarker in mCRPC Patients Undergoing PSMA-Targeted Alpha Therapy with 225Ac-PSMA-I&T. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10050946. [PMID: 35625683 PMCID: PMC9138410 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10050946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: PSMA-based alpha therapy using 225Ac-PSMA-I&T provides treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), even after the failure of 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). In clinical routine, the total tumor volume (TTV) on PSMA PET impacts therapy outcomes and plays an increasing role in mCRPC patients. Hence, we aimed to assess TTV and its changes during 225Ac-PSMA-I&T RLT. Methods: mCRPC patients undergoing RLT with 225Ac-PSMA-I&T with available 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT prior to therapy initiation were included. TTV was assessed in all patients using established cut-off values. Image derived, clinical and biochemistry parameters (PSA, LDH, AP, pain score) were analyzed prior to and after two cycles of 225Ac-PSMA. Changes in TTV and further parameters were directly compared and then correlated with established response criteria, such as RECIST 1.1 or mPERCIST. Results: 13 mCRPC patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 10 months. Prior to 225Ac-PSMA RLT, there was no significant correlation between TTV with other clinical parameters (p > 0.05 each). Between short-term survivors (STS, <10 months OS) and long-term survivors (LTS, ≥10 months OS), TTV and PSA were comparable (p = 0.592 & p = 0.286, respectively), whereas AP was significantly lower in the LTS (p = 0.029). A total of 7/13 patients completed two cycles and underwent a follow-up 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Among these patients, there was a significant decrease in TTV (median 835 vs. 201 mL, p = 0.028) and PSA (median 687 ng/dL vs. 178 ng/dL, p = 0.018) after two cycles of 225Ac-PSMA RLT. Here, percentage changes of TTV after two cycles showed no direct correlation to all other clinical parameters (p > 0.05 each). In two patients, new PET-avid lesions were detected on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. However, TTV and PSA were decreasing or stable. Conclusion: PET-derived assessment of TTV is an easily applicable imaging biomarker independent of other established parameters prior to 225Ac-PSMA RLT in these preliminary follow-up data. Even after the failure of 177Lu-PSMA, patients with extensive TTV seem to profit from RLT. All but one patient who was eligible for ≥2 cycles of 225Ac-PSMA-RLT demonstrated drastic TTV decreases without direct correlation to other biomarkers, such as serum PSA changes. Changes in TTV might hence improve the response assessment compared to standard classifiers by reflecting the current tumor load independent of the occurrence of new lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4400-74646
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Mathias J. Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Franz J. Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Sophie C. Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Gabriel T. Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (J.C.); (C.G.S.)
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (J.C.); (C.G.S.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (C.C.C.); (J.R.); (M.U.)
| | - Clemens C. Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (C.C.C.); (J.R.); (M.U.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (C.C.C.); (J.R.); (M.U.)
| | - Christian G. Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (J.C.); (C.G.S.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (C.C.C.); (J.R.); (M.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Holzgreve A, Pötter D, Brendel M, Orth M, Weidner L, Gold L, Kirchner MA, Bartos LM, Unterrainer LM, Unterrainer M, Steiger K, von Baumgarten L, Niyazi M, Belka C, Bartenstein P, Riemenschneider MJ, Lauber K, Albert NL. Longitudinal [ 18F]GE-180 PET Imaging Facilitates In Vivo Monitoring of TSPO Expression in the GL261 Glioblastoma Mouse Model. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10040738. [PMID: 35453488 PMCID: PMC9030822 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10040738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) is increasingly recognized as an interesting target for the imaging of glioblastoma (GBM). Here, we investigated TSPO PET imaging and autoradiography in the frequently used GL261 glioblastoma mouse model and aimed to generate insights into the temporal evolution of TSPO radioligand uptake in glioblastoma in a preclinical setting. We performed a longitudinal [18F]GE-180 PET imaging study from day 4 to 14 post inoculation in the orthotopic syngeneic GL261 GBM mouse model (n = 21 GBM mice, n = 3 sham mice). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed at the day of the final PET scan (±1 day). [18F]GE-180 autoradiography was performed on day 7, 11 and 14 (ex vivo: n = 13 GBM mice, n = 1 sham mouse; in vitro: n = 21 GBM mice; n = 2 sham mice). Brain sections were also used for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and TSPO immunohistochemistry. [18F]GE-180 uptake in PET was elevated at the site of inoculation in GBM mice as compared to sham mice at day 11 and later (at day 14, TBRmax +27% compared to sham mice, p = 0.001). In GBM mice, [18F]GE-180 uptake continuously increased over time, e.g., at day 11, mean TBRmax +16% compared to day 4, p = 0.011. [18F]GE-180 uptake as depicted by PET was in all mice co-localized with contrast-enhancement in CT and tissue-based findings. [18F]GE-180 ex vivo and in vitro autoradiography showed highly congruent tracer distribution (r = 0.99, n = 13, p < 0.001). In conclusion, [18F]GE-180 PET imaging facilitates non-invasive in vivo monitoring of TSPO expression in the GL261 GBM mouse model. [18F]GE-180 in vitro autoradiography is a convenient surrogate for ex vivo autoradiography, allowing for straightforward identification of suitable models and scan time-points on previously generated tissue sections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
| | - Dennis Pötter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
| | - Michael Orth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.O.); (M.N.); (C.B.); (K.L.)
| | - Lorraine Weidner
- Department of Neuropathology, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (L.W.); (M.J.R.)
| | - Lukas Gold
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
| | - Maximilian A. Kirchner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
| | - Laura M. Bartos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.S.); (L.v.B.)
| | - Katja Steiger
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.S.); (L.v.B.)
- Institute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.S.); (L.v.B.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.O.); (M.N.); (C.B.); (K.L.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.S.); (L.v.B.)
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.O.); (M.N.); (C.B.); (K.L.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.S.); (L.v.B.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.S.); (L.v.B.)
| | - Markus J. Riemenschneider
- Department of Neuropathology, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (L.W.); (M.J.R.)
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.O.); (M.N.); (C.B.); (K.L.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.S.); (L.v.B.)
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (D.P.); (M.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.K.); (L.M.B.); (L.M.U.); (P.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.S.); (L.v.B.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Holzgreve A, Völter F, Delker A, Kunz WG, Fabritius MP, Brendel M, Albert NL, Bartenstein P, Unterrainer M, Unterrainer LM. Detection of Splenic Tissue Using 99mTc-Labelled Denatured Red Blood Cells Scintigraphy—A Quantitative Single Center Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020486. [PMID: 35204576 PMCID: PMC8871479 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Red blood cells (RBC) scintigraphy can be used not only for detection of bleeding sites, but also of spleen tissue. However, there is no established quantitative readout. Therefore, we investigated uptake in suspected splenic lesions in direct quantitative correlation to sites of physiologic uptake in order to objectify the readout. Methods: 20 patients with Tc-99m-labelled RBC scintigraphy and SPECT/low-dose CT for assessment of suspected splenic tissue were included. Lesions were rated as vital splenic or non-splenic tissue, and uptake and physiologic uptake of bone marrow, pancreas, and spleen were then quantified using a volume-of-interest based approach. Hepatic uptake served as a reference. Results: The median uptake ratio was significantly higher in splenic (2.82 (range, 0.58–24.10), n = 47) compared to other lesions (0.49 (0.01–0.83), n = 7), p < 0.001, and 5 lesions were newly discovered. The median pancreatic uptake was 0.09 (range 0.03–0.67), bone marrow 0.17 (0.03–0.45), and orthotopic spleen 14.45 (3.04–29.82). Compared to orthotopic spleens, the pancreas showed lowest uptake (0.09 vs. 14.45, p = 0.004). Based on pancreatic uptake we defined a cutoff (0.75) to distinguish splenic from other tissues. Conclusion: As the uptake in extra-splenic regions is invariably low compared to splenules, it can be used as comparator for evaluating suspected splenic tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (A.D.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (P.B.); (L.M.U.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Friederike Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (A.D.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (P.B.); (L.M.U.)
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (A.D.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (P.B.); (L.M.U.)
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (M.P.F.); (M.U.)
| | - Matthias P. Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (M.P.F.); (M.U.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (A.D.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (P.B.); (L.M.U.)
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (A.D.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (P.B.); (L.M.U.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (A.D.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (P.B.); (L.M.U.)
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (M.P.F.); (M.U.)
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (A.D.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (P.B.); (L.M.U.)
| |
Collapse
|