1
|
Yu P, Wang Y, Su F, Chen Y. Comparing [18F]FET PET and [18F]FDOPA PET for glioma recurrence diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1346951. [PMID: 38269019 PMCID: PMC10805829 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1346951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of our meta-analysis and systematic review was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic effectiveness of [18F]FET PET and [18F]FDOPA PET in detecting glioma recurrence. Methods Sensitivities and specificities were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird methodology, and subsequently transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double inverse sine transformation. Confidence intervals were computed employing the Jackson method, while heterogeneity within and between groups was evaluated through the Cochrane Q and I² statistics. If substantial heterogeneity among the studies was observed (P < 0.10 or I² > 50%), we conducted meta-regression and sensitivity analyses. Publication bias was assessed through the test of a funnel plot and the application of Egger's test. For all statistical tests, except for assessing heterogeneity (P < 0.10), statistical significance was determined when the two-tailed P value fell below 0.05. Results Initially, 579 publications were identified, and ultimately, 22 studies, involving 1514 patients(1226 patients for [18F]FET PET and 288 patients for [18F]FDOPA PET), were included in the analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of [18F]FET PET were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91), respectively, while for [18F]FDOPA PET, the values were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-1.00) for sensitivity and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98) for specificity. A statistically significant difference in sensitivity existed between these two radiotracers (P=0.04), while no significant difference was observed in specificity (P=0.58). Conclusion It seems that [18F]FDOPA PET demonstrates superior sensitivity and similar specificity to [18F] FET PET. Nevertheless, it's crucial to emphasize that [18F]FDOPA PET results were obtained from studies with limited sample sizes. Further larger prospective studies, especially head-to-head comparisons, are needed in this issue. Systematic Review Registration identifier CRD42023463476.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yan Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahimpour M, Boellaard R, Jentjens S, Deckers W, Goffin K, Koole M. A multi-label CNN model for the automatic detection and segmentation of gliomas using [ 18F]FET PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2441-2452. [PMID: 36933075 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06193-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the automatic detection and segmentation of gliomas using [18F]fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET. METHODS Ninety-three patients (84 in-house/7 external) who underwent a 20-40-min static [18F]FET PET scan were retrospectively included. Lesions and background regions were defined by two nuclear medicine physicians using the MIM software, such that delineations by one expert reader served as ground truth for training and testing the CNN model, while delineations by the second expert reader were used to evaluate inter-reader agreement. A multi-label CNN was developed to segment the lesion and background region while a single-label CNN was implemented for a lesion-only segmentation. Lesion detectability was evaluated by classifying [18F]FET PET scans as negative when no tumor was segmented and vice versa, while segmentation performance was assessed using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and segmented tumor volume. The quantitative accuracy was evaluated using the maximal and mean tumor to mean background uptake ratio (TBRmax/TBRmean). CNN models were trained and tested by a threefold cross-validation (CV) using the in-house data, while the external data was used for an independent evaluation to assess the generalizability of the two CNN models. RESULTS Based on the threefold CV, the multi-label CNN model achieved 88.9% sensitivity and 96.5% precision for discriminating between positive and negative [18F]FET PET scans compared to a 35.3% sensitivity and 83.1% precision obtained with the single-label CNN model. In addition, the multi-label CNN allowed an accurate estimation of the maximal/mean lesion and mean background uptake, resulting in an accurate TBRmax/TBRmean estimation compared to a semi-automatic approach. In terms of lesion segmentation, the multi-label CNN model (DSC = 74.6 ± 23.1%) demonstrated equal performance as the single-label CNN model (DSC = 73.7 ± 23.2%) with tumor volumes estimated by the single-label and multi-label model (22.9 ± 23.6 ml and 23.1 ± 24.3 ml, respectively) closely approximating the tumor volumes estimated by the expert reader (24.1 ± 24.4 ml). DSCs of both CNN models were in line with the DSCs by the second expert reader compared with the lesion segmentations by the first expert reader, while detection and segmentation performance of both CNN models as determined with the in-house data were confirmed by the independent evaluation using external data. CONCLUSION The proposed multi-label CNN model detected positive [18F]FET PET scans with high sensitivity and precision. Once detected, an accurate tumor segmentation and estimation of background activity was achieved resulting in an automatic and accurate TBRmax/TBRmean estimation, such that user interaction and potential inter-reader variability can be minimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoomeh Rahimpour
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, UZ, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Wies Deckers
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, UZ, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Koole
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, UZ, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Z, Holzgreve A, Unterrainer LM, Ruf VC, Quach S, Bartos LM, Suchorska B, Niyazi M, Wenter V, Herms J, Bartenstein P, Tonn JC, Unterrainer M, Albert NL, Kaiser L. Combination of pre-treatment dynamic [ 18F]FET PET radiomics and conventional clinical parameters for the survival stratification in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:535-545. [PMID: 36227357 PMCID: PMC9816231 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05988-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to build and evaluate a prediction model which incorporates clinical parameters and radiomic features extracted from static as well as dynamic [18F]FET PET for the survival stratification in patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. METHODS A total of 141 patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and dynamic [18F]FET PET prior to surgical intervention were included. Patients with a survival time ≤ 12 months were classified as short-term survivors. First order, shape, and texture radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment static (tumor-to-background ratio; TBR) and dynamic (time-to-peak; TTP) images, respectively, and randomly divided into a training (n = 99) and a testing cohort (n = 42). After feature normalization, recursive feature elimination was applied for feature selection using 5-fold cross-validation on the training cohort, and a machine learning model was constructed to compare radiomic models and combined clinical-radiomic models with selected radiomic features and clinical parameters. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated to assess the predictive performance for identifying short-term survivors in both the training and testing cohort. RESULTS A combined clinical-radiomic model comprising six clinical parameters and six selected dynamic radiomic features achieved highest predictability of short-term survival with an AUC of 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.88) in the independent testing cohort. CONCLUSIONS This study successfully built and evaluated prediction models using [18F]FET PET-based radiomic features and clinical parameters for the individualized assessment of short-term survival in patients with a newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. The combination of both clinical parameters and dynamic [18F]FET PET-based radiomic features reached highest accuracy in identifying patients at risk. Although the achieved accuracy level remained moderate, our data shows that the integration of dynamic [18F]FET PET radiomic data into clinical prediction models may improve patient stratification beyond established prognostic markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhicong Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktoria C Ruf
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Quach
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura M Bartos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sana Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Herms
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li Z, Kaiser L, Holzgreve A, Ruf VC, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Quach S, Herms J, Bartenstein P, Tonn JC, Unterrainer M, Albert NL. Prediction of TERTp-mutation status in IDH-wildtype high-grade gliomas using pre-treatment dynamic [ 18F]FET PET radiomics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4415-4425. [PMID: 34490493 PMCID: PMC8566644 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05526-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate radiomic features extracted from standard static images (20–40 min p.i.), early summation images (5–15 min p.i.), and dynamic [18F]FET PET images for the prediction of TERTp-mutation status in patients with IDH-wildtype high-grade glioma. Methods A total of 159 patients (median age 60.2 years, range 19–82 years) with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic glioma (WHO grade III or IV) and dynamic [18F]FET PET prior to surgical intervention were enrolled and divided into a training (n = 112) and a testing cohort (n = 47) randomly. First-order, shape, and texture radiomic features were extracted from standard static (20–40 min summation images; TBR20–40), early static (5–15 min summation images; TBR5–15), and dynamic (time-to-peak; TTP) images, respectively. Recursive feature elimination was used for feature selection by 10-fold cross-validation in the training cohort after normalization, and logistic regression models were generated using the radiomic features extracted from each image to differentiate TERTp-mutation status. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were calculated to illustrate diagnostic power in both the training and testing cohort. Results The TTP model comprised nine selected features and achieved highest predictability of TERTp-mutation with an AUC of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.71–0.92) and sensitivity of 92.1% in the independent testing cohort. Weak predictive capability was obtained in the TBR5–15 model, with an AUC of 0.61 (95% CI 0.42–0.80) in the testing cohort, while no predictive power was observed in the TBR20–40 model. Conclusions Radiomics based on TTP images extracted from dynamic [18F]FET PET can predict the TERTp-mutation status of IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic high-grade gliomas with high accuracy preoperatively. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05526-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhicong Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktoria C Ruf
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sana Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Quach
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Herms
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steidl E, Langen KJ, Hmeidan SA, Polomac N, Filss CP, Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Keil F, Filipski K, Mottaghy FM, Shah NJ, Steinbach JP, Hattingen E, Maurer GD. Sequential implementation of DSC-MR perfusion and dynamic [ 18F]FET PET allows efficient differentiation of glioma progression from treatment-related changes. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:1956-65. [PMID: 33241456 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05114-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl-)-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET are both applied to discriminate tumor progression (TP) from treatment-related changes (TRC) in patients with suspected recurrent glioma. While the combination of both methods has been reported to improve the diagnostic accuracy, the performance of a sequential implementation has not been further investigated. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the diagnostic value of consecutive PWI and [18F]FET PET. Methods We evaluated 104 patients with WHO grade II–IV glioma and suspected TP on conventional MRI using PWI and dynamic [18F]FET PET. Leakage corrected maximum relative cerebral blood volumes (rCBVmax) were obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast PWI. Furthermore, we calculated static (i.e., maximum tumor to brain ratios; TBRmax) and dynamic [18F]FET PET parameters (i.e., Slope). Definitive diagnoses were based on histopathology (n = 42) or clinico-radiological follow-up (n = 62). The diagnostic performance of PWI and [18F]FET PET parameters to differentiate TP from TRC was evaluated by analyzing receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC). Results Across all patients, the differentiation of TP from TRC using rCBVmax or [18F]FET PET parameters was moderate (AUC = 0.69–0.75; p < 0.01). A rCBVmax cutoff > 2.85 had a positive predictive value for TP of 100%, enabling a correct TP diagnosis in 44 patients. In the remaining 60 patients, combined static and dynamic [18F]FET PET parameters (TBRmax, Slope) correctly discriminated TP and TRC in a significant 78% of patients, increasing the overall accuracy to 87%. A subgroup analysis of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant tumors indicated a superior performance of PWI to [18F]FET PET (AUC = 0.8/< 0.62, p < 0.01/≥ 0.3). Conclusion While marked hyperperfusion on PWI indicated TP, [18F]FET PET proved beneficial to discriminate TP from TRC when PWI remained inconclusive. Thus, our results highlight the clinical value of sequential use of PWI and [18F]FET PET, allowing an economical use of diagnostic methods. The impact of an IDH mutation needs further investigation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-020-05114-0.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim OS, Park JW, Lee ES, Yoo RJ, Kim WI, Lee KC, Shim JH, Chung HK. [ 18F]FET PET is a useful tool for treatment evaluation and prognosis prediction of anti-angiogenic drug in an orthotopic glioblastoma mouse model. Lab Anim Res 2018; 34:248-56. [PMID: 30671112 DOI: 10.5625/lar.2018.34.4.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
O-2-18F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET) has been widely used for glioblastomas (GBM) in clinical practice, although evaluation of its applicability in non-clinical research is still lacking. The objective of this study was to examine the value of [18F]FET for treatment evaluation and prognosis prediction of anti-angiogenic drug in an orthotopic mouse model of GBM. Human U87MG cells were implanted into nude mice and then bevacizumab, a representative anti-angiogenic drug, was administered. We monitored the effect of anti-angiogenic agents using multiple imaging modalities, including bioluminescence imaging (BLI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT). Among these imaging methods analyzed, only [18F]FET uptake showed a statistically significant decrease in the treatment group compared to the control group (P=0.02 and P=0.03 at 5 and 20 mg/kg, respectively). This indicates that [18F]FET PET is a sensitive method to monitor the response of GBM bearing mice to anti-angiogenic drug. Moreover, [18F]FET uptake was confirmed to be a significant parameter for predicting the prognosis of anti-angiogenic drug (P=0.041 and P=0.007, on Days 7 and 12, respectively, on Pearson's correlation; P=0.048 and P=0.030, on Days 7 and 12, respectively, on Cox regression analysis). However, results of BLI or MRI were not significantly associated with survival time. In conclusion, this study suggests that [18F]FET PET imaging is a pertinent imaging modality for sensitive monitoring and accurate prediction of treatment response to anti-angiogenic agents in an orthotopic model of GBM.
Collapse
|