Update on the diagnosis of tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global public health threat, and the development of rapid and precise diagnostic tools is the key to enabling the early start of treatment, monitoring response to treatment, and preventing the spread of the disease.

OBJECTIVES

An overview of recent progress in host- and pathogen-based TB diagnostics.

SOURCES

We conducted a PubMed search of recent relevant articles and guidelines on TB screening and diagnosis.

CONTENT

An overview of currently used methods and perspectives in the following areas of TB diagnostics is provided: immune-based diagnostics, X-ray, clinical symptoms and scores, cough detection, culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and identifying its resistance profile using phenotypic and genotypic methods, including next-generation sequencing, sputum- and non-sputum-based molecular diagnosis of TB and monitoring of response to treatment.

IMPLICATIONS

A brief overview of the most relevant advances and changes in international guidelines regarding screening and diagnosing TB is provided in this review. It aims at reviewing all relevant areas of diagnostics, including both pathogen- and host-based methods.

Optimizing DNA Extraction from Pediatric Stool for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis and Use in Next-Generation Sequencing Applications

The WHO has endorsed the use of stool samples for diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in children, and targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of stool has been shown to support diagnosis and provide information about drug susceptibility (DS). Optimizing extraction of DNA from stool for sequencing is critical to ensure high diagnostic sensitivity and accurate DS information. Human stool samples were spiked with various concentrations of Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and DNA was extracted from the samples using four different DNA extraction kits. Each sample was subjected to quantitative PCR for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria and underwent further analysis to assess the overall DNA yield, fragment length, and purity. This same process was performed with 10 pediatric participants diagnosed with pulmonary TB, and the samples underwent tNGS. The FastDNA spin kit for soil showed the best results on model samples spiked with known quantities of BCG, compared to the other extraction methods evaluated. For clinical samples, the FastDNA and PowerFecal Pro DNA (PowerFecal) kits both showed an increase in the overall DNA quantity, M. tuberculosis-specific DNA quantity, and successful targeted sequencing when testing was performed on stool samples, compared to the two other kits. Three samples extracted via PowerFecal and three samples extracted via FastDNA (from different patients) provided successful sequencing data, with an average depth of coverage of the rpoB region for FastDNA of 298 (range, 107 to 550) and for PowerFecal of 310 (range, 182 to 474), results that were comparable to one another (P = 0.946). The PowerFecal Pro and FastDNA spin kits were superior for extracting DNA from pediatric stool samples for tNGS. IMPORTANCE This is the first study to compare Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA extraction techniques from pediatric stool samples for use with sequencing technologies. It provides an important starting point for other researchers to isolate quality DNA for this purpose to further the field and to continue to optimize protocols and approaches.