Chemical stability and physical compatibility of meropenem in admixtures for continuous and extended intravenous infusions

INTRODUCTION

Prolonged intravenous infusion of beta-lactams increase the clinical cure rate compared to conventional administration in critical or septic patients. This study aimed to determine chemical stability and physical compatibility of meropenem at conditions used in clinical practice to evaluate the stability of the preparation during its administration and the possibility of anticipated preparation.

METHODS

Admixtures in study were: (i) meropenem 6g in 0.9% sodium chloride (NS) in infusor of 2mL/h 50mL or 10mL/h 240mL; (ii) meropenem 1 or 2g in NS in infusion bag of 250mL. Temperatures of study were: (i) infusor: 4.5°C, 32°C or 12h at 4.5°C followed by 32°C; (ii) Infusion bag: 4.5°C, 24.5°C or 6h at 4.5°C followed by 24.5°C. Time of study was 5-6 days in infusor and 1 day in infusion bag. Chemical stability was evaluated by high performance liquid chromatography and physical compatibility by measuring pH and visual inspection.

RESULTS

Chemical stability and physical compatibility of meropenem in admixtures in infusors were reduced at high meropenem concentration and high temperature. Admixtures in infusion bag show chemical stability and physical compatibility for at least 1 day.

CONCLUSION

Administration of meropenem 6g in infusion of 24h in 240mL of 0.9% NaCl in infusor of 10mL/h could be possible if the admixture is infused at 4.5°C. Extended infusion of meropenem 1 or 2g in 0.9% NaCl in infusion bag (250mL) in 3-4h is also feasible. Anticipated preparation of the admixtures in infusion bag is possible with a stability of 24h.

Advances in the work of multidisciplinary teams for the care of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. A post-COVID vision (TEAM 2.0 project)

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project ("Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams") has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context.

[Translated article] Advances in the work of multidisciplinary teams for the care of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. A post-COVID vision (TEAM 2.0 project)

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project ("Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams") has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context.

Quantitative assessment of the exposure-efficacy relationship of glucocerebrosidase using Markovian elements in Gaucher patients treated with enzyme replacement therapy

AIMS

The aims of this study are (i) to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of enzyme activity in Gaucher-type 1 (GD1) patients after intravenous administration of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and, (ii) to establish an exposure-efficacy relationship for bone marrow infiltration to propose dose adjustments according to patient covariate values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective follow-up, semi-experimental multi-centre study was conducted in four hospitals to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of ERT in GD1 patients. 25 individuals with 266 glucocerebrosidase (GCase) observations in plasma and leukocytes and 14 individuals with 68 Spanish Magnetic Resonance Imaging (S-MRI) observations were enrolled.

RESULTS

A two concatenated compartments with zero-order endogenous production and first-order distribution (CL₁ =3.85 x10^-1 L/d) and elimination (CL₂ = 1.25 L/d) allowed to describe GCase observations in plasma and leucocytes, respectively. An exponential time-dependency (k_T =6.14 x10^-1 d^-1 ) effect on CL₁ was incorporated. The final exposure-efficacy model was a longitudinal logistic regression model with a first-order Markov element. An Emax function (EC₅₀ =15.73 U/L and Emax=2.33) linked steady-state concentrations of GCase in leucocytes to the probability of transition across the different S-MRI stages.

CONCLUSION

A population pharmacokinetic model successfully characterized the leukocyte activity-time profiles of GCase following intravenous administration of ERT in GD1 patients together with an exposure-efficacy relationship in bone marrow using markovian elements. The information obtained from this study could be of high clinical relevance in individualization of ERT in GD1 patients, as this could lead to anticipate decision-making regarding clinical response in bone and optimal dosing strategy. NONSTANDARD ABBREVIATIONS: -2LL: -2xlog(likelihood); ERT: enzyme replacement therapy; GCase: glucocerebrosidase activity; GD1: Gaucher disease type 1; GOF: goodness-of-fit plots; IIV: inter-individual variability; NLME: non-linear mixed effects modelling; OFV: objective function value; pc-VPC: prediction-corrected visual predictive check; PK: pharmacokinetic; RSE: relative standard error; RUV: residual unexplained variability, S-MRI: Spanish Magnetic Resonance Imaging, TDM: therapeutic drug monitoring.

Physico-Chemical Stability of Admixtures of Vinflunine Used in Clinical Practice

Procedure of administration of vinflunine is complex and consists of an Y-site injection with fluid at different speeds. Dose is diluted with 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% glucose and infused with half of the 500 mL bag of the fluid over 20 min; after that, the remaining fluid is administered at 300 mL/h. In this study, chemical stability and physical compatibility of vinflunine diluted with in 500 mL of both fluids were evaluated to simplify the administration procedure (infusion of mixture on 20 min followed by 250 mL of fluid at 300 mL/h). Physical compatibility and chemical stability were evaluated at two temperatures and protected from and exposed to light. Physical compatibility was evaluated by visual inspection, gravimetric control and measure of pH. A chromatographic method was developed to evaluate chemical stability. The dilution of vinflunine with 500 mL of fluid to final concentrations of 0.75 and 1.54 mg/mL is viable at doses used in clinical practice since admixtures are stable for 2 days at room temperature and at least 7 days under refrigeration. These results extend the expiration date of mixtures of vinflunine administered by the usual procedure and confirm the viability of the proposed procedure since administration is simplified and stability of vinflunine is guaranteed.

Best practices for interdisciplinary care of uncontrolled severe asthma patients (TEAM project)

As one of the most prevalent chronic respiratory diseases, asthma imposes a heavy health and socioeconomic burden on society,  particularly in the case of patients who fail to appropriately control the  disease. For this reason, improving the clinical management of patients  with severe uncontrolled asthma should be a priority for any healthcare  system.At a time when healthcare models for chronic disease management and  personalized medicine are undergoing a major overhaul, the project presented in this study seeks to lay the foundations for an  interdisciplinary care model for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. The work carried out reinforces the general perception that it is  paramount to optimize coordination between different levels of care,  encourage collaboration and an interdisciplinary approach, and promote  an integrated care model that makes it possible to adapt the care of  patients with severe uncontrolled asthma in a more personalized manner. Under this project, a series of interdisciplinary working groups were  created, made up of specialist hospital pharmacists, pneumologists and  allergists, to identify and prioritize a number of best practices, and  classify them in terms of their potential impact on the improvement of  the quality of care and the health outcomes of patients with severe  uncontrolled asthma, and their feasibility. The authors' ambition is that  the conclusions drawn from this study should help other interdisciplinary  teams improve the care provided to patients suffering from severe  uncontrolled asthma.

Evaluation of ABC gene polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of capecitabine in colorectal patients: Implications for dosing recommendations

AIMS

The aims are to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of capecitabine (CAP) and its main metabolites after the oral administration of CAP in colorectal cancer patients with different polymorphisms of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) gene and a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model capable of accounting for the neutropenic effects, and to optimize the dosing strategy based on the polymorphisms of the ABC gene and/or the administration regimen as a single agent or in combination.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were included, with 432 plasma levels of CAP, 5'-desoxi-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and 370 neutrophil observations. Capecitabine doses ranged from 1250 to 2500 mg/m² /24 h. Plasma measurements of CAP, 5'-DFUR and 5-FU were obtained at 1, 2 and 3 hours post administration. Neutrophil levels were measured between day 15 and day 24 post administration.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic model incorporates oxaliplatin as a covariate on absorption lag time, rs6720173 (ABCG5 gene) on clearance of 5'-DFUR (182% increase for mutated rs6720173) and rs2271862 (ABCA2 gene) on clearance of 5-FU (184% increase for mutated rs2271862). System- (Circ₀ = 3.54 × 10⁹ cells/mL, MTT = 204 hours and γ = 6.0 × 10^-2 ) and drug-related (slope [SLP] = 3.1 × 10^-2 mL/mg). Co-administration of oxaliplatin resulted in a 2.84-fold increase in SLP. The predicted exposure thresholds to G3/4 neutropenia in combination and monotherapy were 26 and 70 mg·h/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model characterized the time course of capecitabine and its metabolites in plasma. Dose recommendations of capecitabine in patients with mutated and wild allele for single nucleotide polymorphisms rs2271862 of ≤3000 and ≤2400 mg/m² /24 h in monotherapy and ≤1750 and ≤600 mg/m² /24 h in combination with oxaliplatin, respectively, have been proposed.

Quantitative and qualitative control of antineoplastic preparations: Gravimetry versus HPLC

This article compares gravimetry vs. high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as quality control (QC) methods for paclitaxel, docetaxel and oxaliplatin preparations. We aimed at assessing the preparation method reliability in our hospital, evaluating compounding accuracy and estimating the influence of personnel training and standardized homogenization on compounding accuracy. Agreement, correlation, concordance, accuracy and precision between methods were evaluated for each drug. Conforming preparation percentages (CPs) at different tolerance limits (TLs) and compounding accuracy were calculated for each method and drug. Compounding accuracy was compared before and after personnel training and standardized homogenization implantation. SPSS v 20.0 and Ene v 2.0 were used. A total of 222 samples (58 docetaxel, 95 paclitaxel and 69 oxaliplatin) were analyzed. Gravimetry and HPLC are comparable methods. Overall CP was 81% for gravimetry at 10% TL and 85% for HPLC at 15% TL. Compounding accuracy is shown to be good for all methods and drugs. Homogenization optimization and personnel training make measurements more accurate for docetaxel and paclitaxel HPLC, but seem to worsen accuracy for docetaxel gravimetry. Gravimetry has shown to be a good alternative to HPLC for routine QC. Coupling with electronic methods should be considered in the future.

Patient and health professional satisfaction with an interdisciplinary patient safety program

Background Measuring humanistic outcomes is an important component of valuating healthcare services. There is a paucity of data on satisfaction with pharmacist implemented clinical services in long-term care settings. Objective To evaluate patient and health professional (HP) satisfaction with an interdisciplinary patient safety program performed in elderly patients with polypharmacy admitted to a long-term care hospital (LTCH). Method An interventional, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted in a Spanish LTCH. Pharmacist conducted the pharmacotherapy follow-up (reconciliation, pharmacotherapeutic optimization and educational interviews). Two satisfaction surveys were designed on a 10-point Likert-type scale. The patient survey was administered at discharge. The HP survey included the following dimensions: knowledge and program importance, pharmacist skills and pharmacist contributions to the interdisciplinary team. A reliability analysis was performed. Results 123 surveys were completed and returned; 74 patient surveys (response rate 97.4%) and 49 HP surveys (response rate 98.0%). The overall mean score of the patient survey was 9.46 ± 0.87, resulting in 82.4% very satisfied and 17.6% satisfied. The overall mean score of the HP survey was 8.85 ± 1.42, resulting in 65.3% very satisfied and 30.6% satisfied. Conclusion Elderly patients with polypharmacy and HPs reported high levels of satisfaction with the interdisciplinary patient safety program implemented in an LTCH. This positive response supports the value of pharmacists for managing older high-risk populations.

Relationship Between Glucocerebrosidase Activity and Clinical Response to Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Patients With Gaucher Disease Type I

The quantification of enzyme activity in the patient treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has been suggested as a tool for dosage individualization, so we conducted a study to evaluate the relationship between glucocerebrosidase activity and clinical response in patients with Gaucher disease type I (GD1) to ERT. The study included patients diagnosed with GD1, who were being treated with ERT, and healthy individuals. Markers based on glucocerebrosidase activity measurement in patients' leucocytes were studied: enzyme activity at 15 min. post-infusion (Act₇₅ ) reflects the amount of enzyme that is distributed in the body post-ERT infusion, and accumulated glucocerebrosidase activity during ERT infusion (Act_75-0 ) indicates the total drug exposure during infusion. The clinical response was evaluated based on criteria established by Pastores et al. and Gaucher Severity Score Index. Statistical analysis included ROC analysis and area under the curve test. Act₇₅ and Act_75-0 were found to be moderate predictive markers of an optimal clinical response (area under the ROC of Act₇₅ was 0.733 and Act_75-0 was 0.817). Act_75-0 showed statistical significance in its discriminative capacity (p < 0.05) for obtaining an optimal response to ERT. The cut-off point was 58% (RR = 1.800; 95% CI: 1.003-3.229; p < 0.05). Moreover, Act₇₅ showed a significant and inverse correlation with the Gaucher Severity Score Index, and Act₇₅ and Act_75-0 presented a significant correlation with residual enzyme activity at diagnosis. Markers based on glucocerebrosidase activity have a good correlation with clinical response to ERT. Therefore, it could provide supporting clinical data for dose management in GD1 patients.

Improvement on prescribing appropriateness after implementing an interdisciplinary pharmacotherapy quality programme in a long-term care hospital

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in elderly patients with polypharmacy admitted to a long-term care hospital (LTCH) and to evaluate the impact of an interdisciplinary pharmacotherapy quality programme on improvement of prescribing appropriateness.

Methods

An interventional, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted in a Spanish LTCH (October 2013 to July 2014) including 162 elderly (≥70 years) patients with polypharmacy (≥5 medications). Pharmacists conducted the pharmacotherapy follow-up of patients with medication reconciliation, pharmacotherapeutic optimisation and educational interviews from admission to discharge. Reconciliation errors, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), potentially prescribing omissions (PPOs) and significant drug interactions rates were calculated. The impact of the programme was evaluated considering the difference between the inappropriateness score per patient (total number of reconciliation errors, PIMs, PPOs and significant drug interactions) before and after implementing pharmacotherapy recommendations.

Results

At admission, 163 reconciliation errors (median(range), 1(1-6)) in 92 (56.8%) patients (65.6% drug omissions), 335 PIMs (2(1-6)) in 147 (90.7%) patients (39.3% use ≥2 anticholinergic drugs), 43 PPOs (1(1-3)) in 32 (19.8%) patients (48.5% statin omission) and 594 significant drug interactions (4(1-19)) in 130 (80.2%) patients were detected. After implementing pharmacotherapy recommendations, statistically significant reductions in admission reconciliation errors (8.3% to 0.1%), PIMs (17.0% to 12.2%), PPOs (2.2% to 0.7%) and significant drug interactions (30.2% to 26.8%) rates were found. The programme achieved a 31% improvement in prescribing appropriateness, with a statistically significant reduction in the inappropriateness score (6(IQR:4-9) to 4(IQR:2-7)).

Conclusion

Reconciliation errors, PIMs and drug interactions are highly prevalent in elderly patients with polypharmacy admitted to an LTCH. This interdisciplinary pharmacotherapy quality programme seems to be a useful approach in the improvement of prescribing appropriateness in a high-risk older population.

Clinical impact of an interdisciplinary patient safety program for managing drug-related problems in a long-term care hospital

Background Medication reviews intended to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) have been researched in primary care, acute care and nursing homes rather than in long-term care hospitals (LTCHs). Objectives To assess the clinical impact of an interdisciplinary pharmacotherapy quality improvement and patient safety program in elderly patients with polypharmacy admitted to an LTCH. Setting An interventional, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted in a Spanish LTCH Method A total of 162 elderly (≥ 70 years) patients with polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications) were included. Pharmacist conducted the pharmacotherapy follow-up of patients (reconciliation, pharmacotherapeutic optimization, educational interviews) from admission to discharge. Demographic, clinical and treatment-related variables were recorded. Main outcome measured Clinical impact of the program by DRP-based effectiveness and drug-related morbidity (DRM)-based safety indicators. Results 895 DRPs (median of 5 (1-23)) were identified in 153 (94.4%) patients. The most common DRPs were unnecessary drug (25.3%), dosage too high (24.9%) and a need for additional drug (24.8%). The most frequent pharmacotherapy recommendations were individualizing the dosage regimen (29.6%) and stopping (27.3%) or starting (21.9%) a drug. The mean implementation rate of pharmacotherapy recommendations was 90.9%. The effectiveness indicator revealed a 94.9% of prevented or resolved DRPs. The safety indicator showed an 89.3% of prevented or resolved DRM. Therefore, the program prevented or resolved 92.5% of adverse effects and 91.7% of suboptimal responses or therapeutic failures. Conclusion This interdisciplinary patient safety program seems to be a valuable approach to identify, prevent and resolve the high number of DRPs and potential DRM that elderly patients with polypharmacy admitted to an LTCH present.

Population pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer patients

Aims. The pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) after intravenous administration in color- ectal cancer patients were examined using population analysis. The relevant covariates and the extent of inter- and intraindividual variability were evaluated.

Methods. Data from 27 patients with diagnosis of nonmetastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma receiving weekly 5-FU (450 mg/m2), plus levamisol 50 mg/8 hours by oral route for 3 days every 15 days, were pooled with data from 17 patients with diagnosis of metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, receiving daily 5-FU (425 mg/m2) and intravenous folinic acid (20 mg/m2) over five consecutive days (daily times five), every four weeks. In both groups 5-FU was administered as a 60-minute infusion and blood samples were collected at 10, 30 and 60 minutes from the end of the infusion, and analysed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. An open two-compartmental pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination from central compartment was fitted to the plasma concentration data using nonlinear mixed effect modelling (NONMEM). The potential effect of patient covariates was evaluated using a stepwise method. Model evaluation was performed using bootstrap method.

Results. The pharmacokinetic model was successfully fitted to the data. None of the covariates tested were significantly correlated to the pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean parameters’ estimates (%CV) and the percent coefficient of variation of the central tendency parameters, interindividual (IIV), interoccasion (IOV) and residual variability (s) for the final model were: CL (L/h), 65.3 (13.2); Vc (L), 14.7 (11.8); Vp (L), 334.0 (31.4); Q (L/h), 19.6 (25.5); IIVCL (%), 76.5 (34.6); IIVVc (%), 82.3 (31.0); IIVVp (%), 137.5 (35.1); IIVQ (%), 117.5 (38.5); IOVCL (%), 66.1 (45.3); IOVVc (%), 70.8 (39.5); IOVQ (%), 81.1 (27.8) and s (%), 3.0 (25.4). The bootstrap resampling method confirmed the stability of the final model. The estimates of the central tendency parameters, IIV, IOV and residual variability were essentially equal to those generated with the original dataset (0% to 18% deviation) and the 95% confidence intervals included the mean parameters’ estimates obtained from the former set.

Conclusions. The two-compartmental model accurately described the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU administered by short-term infusion. A population pharmacokinetic approach is a useful tool to integrate the knowledge gathered in the clinical setting. The model developed may help in dose adaptation and will further be used in PK/PD modelling of therapeutic outcomes and adverse events.

Cellular Uptake of Glucocerebrosidase in Gaucher Patients Receiving Enzyme Replacement Treatment

BACKGROUND

Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is currently the standard treatment for patients with Gaucher disease type I (GD1), but the pharmacokinetics have hardly been studied. This study aimed to quantify in vivo enzyme activity in peripheral leukocytes from patients receiving long-term treatment with imiglucerase or velaglucerase for GD1, and set out to assess the process of enzymatic uptake by peripheral leukocytes.

METHODS

A prospective semi-experimental study was conducted. Four time points for blood withdrawal were planned per patient to quantify the intra-leukocyte enzymatic activity. In order to assess the uptake process, the rate of enzyme uptake by leukocytes (Rupt) and the rate of enzyme disappearance from the plasma (Rdis) were estimated.

RESULTS

Eight GD1 patients were included. Intra-leukocyte activity was 24.31 mU/mL [standard deviation (SD) 6.32 mU/mL; coefficient of variation (CV) 25.96 %] at baseline and 27.14 mU/mL (SD  6.96 mU/mL; CV 25.65 %) at 15 min post-perfusion. The relationships with the administered dose were linear. The Rupt value was 37.73 mU/mL/min [95 % confidence interval (CI) 25.63-49.84] and showed a linear correlation with the administered enzyme dose (p < 0.05), and the Rdis value was 189.43 mU/mL/min (95 % CI 80.31-298.55) and also showed a linear correlation with the dose (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This was the first in vivo study to quantify the accumulated enzymatic activity in patients receiving ERT for GD1. It showed that intra-leukocyte activity at baseline and at 15 min post-perfusion could be used as a possible marker for therapeutic individualization in patients receiving ERT for GD1.

[Evaluation of two closed-system drug transfer device in the antineoplastic drug elaboration process]

OBJECTIVE

to assess the impact of two closed-system drug transfer device on the local and environmental contamination and preparation times in the process of preparation of parenteral chemotherapy compared to the standard system.

METHOD

prospective observational study. Two different closed- systems providers, Care Fusion® and Icu Medical®, were compared to standard preparation. 15 nurses of Pharmacy Department prepared 5 preparations each one, one with the standard procedure and four using closed-systems. To evaluate the contamination, a fluorescein solution 0.5% was prepared. Two kind of contamination were evaluated, local (three points connection: closed-system connect vial, syringe and final infusion bags) and environmental (gloves and countertop). Percentage of contaminated preparations was obtained in each one. Time taken by each nurse in each preparation was recorded.

RESULTS

75 preparations were prepared. Local contamination was reduced 21% and 75% in closed-system Icu Medical® and Care Fusion® respectively. Care Fusion® closed system, local contamination was significantly lower than the standard system to the vial, syringe and final package, while Icu Medical® closed-systems only was significantly lower in the connection to the vial. Time of preparation was increased significantly with the use of closed-system between 23.4 and 30.5 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

both closed-systems drug transfer device have shown an improvement in contamination than the use of the standard system. However, preparation time has been significantly increased with the use of both systems.

[Incidence, management and costs of adverse effects in chronic hepatitis C patients on triple therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir: first 12 weeks of treatment]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to analyze the incidence, management and cost associated to hematological and dermatological adverse effects (AE) in chronic hepatitis C patients on triple therapy (TT) with telaprevir (TVR) or boceprevir (BOC).

METHODS

An analysis was made on the data recorded on patients who started treatment with TVR or BOC associated with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin in a 12-week follow-up period.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included (TVR n=36; BOC n=17). Thrombocytopenia (83% TVR vs. 88% BOC) followed by neutropenia (89% TVR vs. 82% BOC) were the most common AE. Dermatological AE were observed in 32% of patients. Eleven patients required treatment discontinuation (all of them received TVR), and toxicity was the main reason for discontinuation (64%). The percentage of patients who required supportive treatment for management of AE was 66%. The most used supportive treatment was erythropoietin. Eight patients required emergency health care, and 2 were hospitalized due to AE. Total cost of additional supportive resources was 32,522€ (625 [SD=876]€/patient) (TVR 759 [SD=1,022]€/patient vs. BOC 349 [SD=327]€/patient; P>.05). Patients with gradeiii-iv toxicity required greater supportive care with higher costs, compared to patients with gradei-ii toxicity (849 [SD=1,143]€/patient vs. 387 [SD=397]€/patient; P=.053).

CONCLUSION

The addition of new protease inhibitors to conventional treatment leads to a higher incidence of hematological AE in our study, compared to data described in clinical trials. The elevated incidence of AE involves the use of supportive care, increasing total costs of therapy.

Potential risk of medication discrepancies and reconciliation errors at admission and discharge from an inpatient medical service

BACKGROUND

Medication discrepancies, defined as unexplained variations among drug regimens at care transitions, are common. Some are unintended and cause reconciliation errors that are potentially detrimental for patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of medication discrepancies and reconciliation errors at admission and discharge in hospitalized patients and explore risk factors for reconciliation errors and their potential clinical impact.

METHODS

An observational prospective study was conducted at a general teaching hospital. Patients who were admitted to the internal medicine service and were receiving chronic preadmission treatment were included in the study. Preadmission treatment was compared with the treatment prescribed on admission (first 48 hours) and at hospital discharge, and discrepancies and reconciliation errors were identified. The primary endpoint was the presence of reconciliation errors at admission and/or discharge. Potential risk factors (patient-, medication-, and system-related) for reconciliation errors were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients enrolled in the study between April and August 2009, 109 (90.8%) showed 513 discrepancies. The prevalence of patients with reconciliation errors was 20.8% (95% CI 13.6 to 28.1). Intended medication discrepancies were more frequent at admission (96.6%) than at discharge (75.5%), while reconciliation errors were more frequent at discharge (24.5%) than at admission (3.4%). The prevalence ratio (admission vs discharge) was 2.4 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.0) for discrepancies and 0.65 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.32) for reconciliation errors. The logistic regression analysis revealed an association between the number of discrepancies at admission (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.44) and age (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.10) and an increased risk of reconciliation errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication reconciliation strategies should focus primarily on avoiding errors at discharge. Since medication discrepancies at admission may predispose patients to reconciliation errors, early detection of such discrepancies would logically reduce the risk of reconciliation errors. Medication reconciliation programs must implement a process for gathering accurate preadmission drug histories and must submit this information to a critical assessment of patients' needs.

A Bayesian method for predicting 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetic parameters following short-term infusion in patients with colorectal cancer

The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and validate it using a Bayesian approach for predicting, a priori and a posteriori, the individual volume of distribution (V(d)) and clearance (Cl) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given as short-term intravenous infusion in weekly and multiple doses. Forty-four patients were divided in group A (5-FU weekly doses) including 27 patients with nonmetastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with 450 mg/m(2) of 5-FU, 1 day per week for 48 doses, plus oral levamisol (50 mg/8 h) for 3 days, every 15 days and group B (5-FU multiple doses) including 17 patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, receiving 5-FU (425 mg/m(2)) plus intravenous folinic acid (20 mg/m(2)) over 5 consecutive days, every 4 weeks for six cycles. In both groups 5-FU was administered as a 30-60-min infusion. A total of 176 plasma concentrations were analyzed using a NONMEM program according to a linear one-compartment model. In group A, 5-FU population pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained and the covariables studied were age, gender, weight, ideal body weight, height, body surface area, creatinine clearance, and hepatic function tests. A priori and a posteriori validation of this model was carried out with plasma concentrations obtained in day 1 in group B. In group B, population pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU following multiple doses were estimated using scale factors to identify differences in 5-FU V(d) and Cl between days 1 and 4, and the interindividual, interoccasion, and residual variabilities studied. V(d) was 0.266 L/kg of ideal body weight and Cl was 1.21 L/h. kg of total weight following weekly doses. The plasma sample obtained at 10 min gave the best accuracy and precision predictions. When 5-FU was administered in multiple doses, the Cl of the drug in day 4 is reduced by 30.14% compared to day 1. The interoccasion variability was lower than interindividual variability for both V(d) and Cl, suggesting that it could be feasible to individualise dosage of 5-FU for subsequent cycles from data obtained in a previous one in an attempt to improve the therapeutic index of colorectal cancer treatment.