Final Study Report of Andexanet Alfa for Major Bleeding With Factor Xa Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant inactive factor Xa (FXa) designed to reverse FXa inhibitors. ANNEXA-4 (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors) was a multicenter, prospective, phase-3b/4, single-group cohort study that evaluated andexanet alfa in patients with acute major bleeding. The results of the final analyses are presented.

METHODS

Patients with acute major bleeding within 18 hours of FXa inhibitor administration were enrolled. Co-primary end points were anti-FXa activity change from baseline during andexanet alfa treatment and excellent or good hemostatic efficacy, defined by a scale used in previous reversal studies, at 12 hours. The efficacy population included patients with baseline anti-FXa activity levels above predefined thresholds (≥75 ng/mL for apixaban and rivaroxaban, ≥40 ng/mL for edoxaban, and ≥0.25 IU/mL for enoxaparin; reported in the same units used for calibrators) who were adjudicated as meeting major bleeding criteria (modified International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition). The safety population included all patients. Major bleeding criteria, hemostatic efficacy, thrombotic events (stratified by occurring before or after restart of either prophylactic [ie, a lower dose, for prevention rather than treatment] or full-dose oral anticoagulation), and deaths were assessed by an independent adjudication committee. Median endogenous thrombin potential at baseline and across the follow-up period was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

There were 479 patients enrolled (mean age, 78 years; 54% male, 86% White; 81% anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation at a median time of 11.4 hours since last dose, with 245 (51%) on apixaban, 176 (37%) on rivaroxaban, 36 (8%) on edoxaban, and 22 (5%) on enoxaparin. Bleeding was predominantly intracranial (n=331 [69%]) or gastrointestinal (n=109 [23%]). In evaluable apixaban patients (n=172), median anti-FXa activity decreased from 146.9 ng/mL to 10.0 ng/mL (reduction, 93% [95% CI, 94-93]); in rivaroxaban patients (n=132), it decreased from 214.6 ng/mL to 10.8 ng/mL (94% [95% CI, 95-93]); in edoxaban patients (n=28), it decreased from 121.1 ng/mL to 24.4 ng/mL (71% [95% CI, 82-65); and in enoxaparin patients (n=17), it decreased from 0.48 IU/mL to 0.11 IU/mL (75% [95% CI, 79-67]). Excellent or good hemostasis occurred in 274 of 342 evaluable patients (80% [95% CI, 75-84]). In the safety population, thrombotic events occurred in 50 patients (10%); in 16 patients, this occurred during treatment with prophylactic anticoagulation that began after the bleeding event. No thrombotic episodes occurred after oral anticoagulation restart. Specific to certain populations, reduction of anti-FXa activity from baseline to nadir significantly predicted hemostatic efficacy in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.54-0.70]) and correlated with lower mortality in patients <75 years of age (adjusted P=0.022; unadjusted P=0.003). Median endogenous thrombin potential was within the normal range by the end of andexanet alfa bolus through 24 hours for all FXa inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with major bleeding associated with the use of FXa inhibitors, treatment with andexanet alfa reduced anti-FXa activity and was associated with good or excellent hemostatic efficacy in 80% of patients.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02329327.

Effect of standardized perioperative dabigatran interruption on the residual anticoagulation effect at the time of surgery or procedure

ESSENTIALS: Anticoagulants need to be stopped preprocedure so there is little or no remaining anticoagulant effect. We assessed the residual anticoagulant effect with standardized interruption for patients on dabigatran. With this protocol, 80-86% of patients had no residual anticoagulant effect at the time of a procedure. A standardized perioperative dabigatran protocol appears to be safe, but requires further study.

BACKGROUND

In patients taking dabigatran who require treatment interruption for a surgery/procedure, a sufficient interruption interval is needed so that there is little or no residual anticoagulant effect at the time of the surgery/procedure.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of patients receiving dabigatran (110 mg or 150 mg twice daily) who required an elective surgery/procedure and received a standardized dabigatran interruption protocol based on surgery/procedure bleeding risk and renal function was performed. Before the surgery/procedure, a blood sample was taken for measurement of the prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and dilute thrombin time (dTT). We determined the proportion of all patients and those having a high bleeding risk surgery/procedure with normal coagulation test results at the time of the surgery/procedure. The APTT and dTT were considered to be most likely to reflect a dabigatran anticoagulant effect. Patients were followed up for 30 days postprocedure to assess for bleeding and thromboembolism.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-one patients were studied: 118 with low bleeding risk, and 63 with high bleeding risk. For all patients, the proportions with normal PT, APTT, TT dTT levels were 92.8%, 79.6%, 33.1%, and 80.7%, respectively. In patients with high bleeding risk, the proportions with normal PT, APTT, TT dTT levels were 93.7%, 85.7%, 57.1%, and 87.3%, respectively. During follow-up, there was one (0.6%) major bleed, there were nine (5.0%) minor bleeds, and there was one (0.6%) transient ischemic attack.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving dabigatran who require an elective surgery/procedure, a standardized interruption protocol yielded 80-86% of patients with no residual anticoagulant effect at the time of surgery/procedure, and with a low incidence of bleeding.

The carboxylation efficiency of the vitamin K-dependent clotting factors: studies with factor IX

Haemophilia B is characterized by a deficiency of the gamma-carboxylated protein, factor IX (FIX). As a first step to optimize a gene therapy strategy to treat haemophilia B, we employed a previously described approach (Biochemistry 2000;39: 14322) of altering the propeptide of vitamin K-dependent proteins in vitro, to improve the carboxylation efficiency of FIX. Both native FIX and FIX with a prothrombin propeptide (proPT-FIX) produced recombinant FIX in vitro following transfection of their cDNAs into human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Using hydroxyapatite chromatography to separate carboxylated from uncarboxylated FIX, we are able to show that >90% of FIX is gamma-carboxylated and that substituting the propeptide of prothrombin into FIX does not further increase the relative amounts of carboxylated material. These results demonstrate that the nature of the propeptide, per se is not the sole determinant of optimal carboxylation of FIX in our expression system in HEK 293 cells.

Galectin 3-binding protein is a potential contaminant of recombinantly produced factor IX

Haemophilia B, or factor IX (FIX) deficiency, represents 15% of the hereditary haemophilias. The serious morbidity from the transmission of infectious agents in plasma-derived material has mandated a need for the production of recombinant product. The rate-limiting step for the production of recombinant FIX is gamma-carboxylation, a post-translational modification carried out only in mammalian cells. To test the carboxylation efficiency of recombinantly produced FIX in vitro and to improve the isolation of the pure active product, we produced FIX in a transfected human cell line (293 human embryonic kidney cells) and isolated material by immunoaffinity chromatography followed by hydroxyapatite chromatography. Unexpectedly, during hydroxyapatite chromatography, we discovered that purified FIX was contaminated by a heretofore unknown protein. Further analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) sequencing revealed this protein to be galectin-3-binding protein (G3BP). The above results raise an important note of caution regarding the production of recombinant FIX and, indeed, other proteins produced recombinantly in mammalian cells.

The effect of warfarin on the risk of prostate cancer

14524

Background: The anticancer activity of oral anticoagulants has been a matter of debate for several years. Recent evidence suggests that prolonged treatment with warfarin may be associated with a reduced incidence of newly diagnosed urogenital cancer during long-term follow-up of patients with venous thromboembolism. The aim of this study was to assess whether exposure to warfarin was associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer in a large population-based cohort. Methods: We conducted a matched case-control study nested within the population of beneficiaries of the Saskatchewan Prescription Drug Plan aged 50 years and older from 1981–2002 with no history of cancer since 1967. New cases of prostate cancer diagnosed between 1981 and 2002 were identified using the linked Saskatchewan Cancer Agency registry. Six controls per case matched on age, gender, and sampling time were randomly selected. The cumulative exposure to warfarin in the five years preceding the cancer diagnosis was assessed. Prescription counts were used to define warfarin exposure. Exposure in the year immediately preceding the cancer diagnosis was excluded to control for detection bias. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to assess confounding by other drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications. Results: Among 11502 cases and 69012 controls, 7.4% of cases and 7.1% of controls had a history of any warfarin use. Compared to men who had never used warfarin, adjusted odds ratio (OR) for prostate cancer among ever-users in the 5 year period was 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86–1.03). In those who accumulated 1, 2, 3 and 4 years of warfarin use, the adjusted ORs were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.89–1.16), 1.00 (95% CI, 0.82–1.23), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.60–1.09), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.99), respectively (p-trend=0.03). Conclusion: Our results suggest that cumulative use of warfarin of at least 4 years may be associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer. However, confounding by other determinants of prostate cancer associated with warfarin use is possible. Nonetheless, confirmation of these findings by prospective studies may provide the evidence necessary to consider the use of warfarin in prostate cancer prevention.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The role of gamma-carboxylation in the anti-apoptotic function of gas6

Gas6 is a novel member of the vitamin K-dependent family of gamma-carboxylated proteins and is a ligand for the receptor tyrosine kinase Axl. Gas6-Axl interactions have been shown to mediate cell survival in vascular endothelium. Although the receptor-binding portion of gas6 lies in the C-terminus, the significance of the N-terminal gamma-carboxylated residues (Gla domain) is not clear. To address this question, this study examines the role of the Gla domain in phospholipid binding as well as in the promotion of cell survival, especially in endothelial cells. The results show that carboxylated gas6 binds to phosphatidylserine-containing phospholipid membranes in an analogous manner to other gamma-carboxylated proteins whereas decarboxylated gas6 does not. The gamma-carboxylation inhibitor warfarin abrogates gas6-mediated protection of NIH3T3 fibroblasts from serum starvation-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, the role of gamma-carboxylation in gas6's survival effect on endothelium is demonstrated directly in that only carboxylated, but not decarboxylated, gas6 protects endothelial cells from serum starvation-induced apoptosis. gamma-carboxylation is also required for both Axl phosphorylation and PI3 kinase activation. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that gamma-carboxylation is necessary not only for gas6 binding to phospholipid membranes, but also for gas6-mediated endothelial cell survival.