A phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder or biliary tract

BACKGROUND

Advanced biliary tract carcinomas are associated with a poor prognosis, and palliative chemotherapy has only modest benefit. This multi-centre phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with inoperable gall bladder or biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

This was a Phase II, non-randomised, two-stage Simon design, multi-centre study. Ethics approval was sought and obtained by the North West MREC, and then locally by the West Glasgow Hospitals Research Ethics Committee. Eligible patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder or biliary tract and with adequate performance status, haematologic, renal, and hepatic function were treated with capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) po, twice daily, days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) i.v., day 1) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary objective of the study was to determine the objective tumour response rates (complete and partial). The secondary objectives included assessment of toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were recruited between July 2003 and December 2005. The regimen was well tolerated with no grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Grade 3/4 sensory neuropathy was observed in six patients. Two-thirds of patients received their chemotherapy without any dose delays. Overall response rate was 23.8% (95% CI 12.05-39.5%). Stable disease was observed in a further 13 patients (31%) and progressive disease observed in 12 (28.6%) of patients. The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI 2.8-6.4 months; Fig. 1) and the median overall survival 7.9 months (95% CI 5.3-10.4 months; Fig. 2). Fig. 1 Progression-free survival Fig. 2 Overall survival

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin has a lower disease control and shorter overall survival than the combination of cisplatin with gemcitabine which has subsequently become the standard of care in this disease. However, capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin does have modest activity in this disease, and can be considered as an alternative treatment option for patients in whom cisplatin and/or gemcitabine are contra-indicated.

A phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with epirubicin, carboplatin and capecitabine (ECarboX) in advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The protease inhibitor bortezomib attenuates the action of NF-κB and has shown preclinical activity alone and in combination with chemotherapy.

DESIGN

A Phase I dose-escalation study was performed administering bortezomib (0.7, 1.0, 1.3 and 1.6 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 from cycle 2 onwards) in combination with Epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) intravenously on day 1, Carboplatin AUC 5 day 1 and Capecitabine 625 mg m(-2) BD days 1-21 every 21 days (VECarboX regimen), in patients with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Bortezomib when combined with ECarboX.

RESULTS

18 patients received bortezomib 0.7 (n = 6), 1.0 (n = 3), 1.3 (n = 6) and 1.6 mg m(-2) (n = 3) and a protocol amendment reducing the capecitabine dose to 500 mg m(-2) BD was enacted due to myelotoxicity. Common treatment-related non-haematological adverse events of any grade were fatigue (83.3 %), anorexia (55.6 %), constipation (55.6 %) and nausea (55.6 %). Common Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were neutropenia (77.8 %) and thrombocytopenia (44.4 %). Objective responses were achieved in 6 patients (33.3 %) and a further 5 patients (27.8 %) had stable disease for >8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of Bortezomib to ECarboX is well tolerated and response rates are comparable with standard chemotherapy.

Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of AMG 386 (trebananib) in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic gastro-oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

We evaluated AMG 386, an investigational peptibody that neutralizes the interaction between angiopoietins-1 and -2 and the Tie2 receptor, combined with cisplatin/capecitabine (CX) as first-line treatment for metastatic gastro-oesophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or distal oesophageal adenocarcinoma were randomized 1:1:1 to CX (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) IV Q3W; capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) P.O. BID for 14 days Q3W) plus intravenous AMG 386 10 mg/kg QW (Arm A) or 3 mg/kg QW (Arm B), or placebo QW (Arm C). The primary end point was estimated progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were enrolled. Median estimated PFS in Arms A, B, and C was 4.2, 4.9, and 5.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio for Arms A+B combined versus Arm C, 0.98; 95% CI 0.67-1.43; P = 0.92). Objective response rates were 27% (Arm A), 43% (Arm B), and 35% (Arm C). Incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 80% in Arm A, 84% in Arm B, and 75% in Arm C. There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, PFS and ORR were estimated to be similar with AMG 386 plus CX and placebo plus CX treatment. Compared with placebo, toxicity of AMG 386 plus CX was greater but manageable.

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION

The results of this study have not been previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere. The results were presented in part at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, San Francisco, CA, January 20-22, 2011.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00583674.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of AMG 386 in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine (CX) in patients (pts) with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

66

Background: AMG 386, a first-in-class investigational peptide-Fc fusion protein (peptibody), blocks angiogenesis via inhibiting the interaction between angiopoietins-1 and -2 and the Tie2 receptor. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of AMG 386 or placebo plus CX in the first-line treatment of metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Methods: Pts with confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction or distal esophagus were randomized 1:1:1 to receive CX (cisplatin, 80 mg/m2 IV Q3W; capecitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 orally BID for 14 days Q3W) plus AMG 386 10 mg/kg (Arm A), 3 mg/kg (Arm B), or placebo (Arm C) IV QW. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR; in pts with measurable disease), adverse events (AEs), and pharmacokinetics (PK).

Results: 171 pts were randomized (Arm A/B/C, n = 56/59/56). Efficacy results are summarized in the table. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs in Arms A/B/C was 80/84/75%. Serious AEs occurred in 73/60/47% and serious AEs grade ≥ 3 in 66/60/43% of pts. AEs in Arms A/B/C included abdominal pain (30/40/17%; grade ≥ 3, 18/3/4%), peripheral edema (13/29/6%; grade ≥ 3, 0/2/0%), venous thromboembolic events (20/22/19%; grade ≥ 3, 20/19/17%), and pulmonary embolism (9/3/15%; grade ≥ 3, 9/2/13%). Median AMG 386 Cmax and Cmin values at steady state after CX coadministration were dose-proportional. Coadministration with CX did not markedly affect AMG 386 exposure.

Conclusions: In this study, AMG 386 plus CX did not significantly improve PFS or ORR over placebo plus CX in this patient population. The toxicity of the combination of AMG 386 plus CX, compared with placebo, was greater but manageable. No unexpected AEs occurred.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Impact of socioeconomic status on treatment outcome in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer in Northern Ireland

e20531

Background: The survival advantage for combination chemotherapy in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is well documented. Epirubicin and cisplatin in combination with either 5FU (ECF) or capecitabine (ECX) result in response rates of 35–46% and a median survival of around 9 months in RCT. We report the impact of socioeconomic status on the outcome of ECF and ECX treatment in advanced gastroesophageal cancer patients in Northern Ireland between 2000 and 2007. Methods: All patients with advanced esophageal (O), gastric (G), or esophagogastric junction (OGJ) adenocarcinoma, receiving palliative chemotherapy from January 2000 to August 2007, were identified from our institutional database. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment details, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Patients receiving chemotherapy in a clinical trial were excluded. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Deprivation was assessed using the patient's home address deprivation index (DPI) (Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2005; May 2005. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency. www.nisra.gov.uk ). Results: 274 eligible patients (m=200, f=74, O=114, OGJ=19, G=141) were identified. Median age was 62 years (range 22–83). 172 (62.8%) had ECOG performance status 0 or 1. 231 patients (84.3%) had metastatic disease, 43 (15.7%) had locally advanced disease. 216 (78.8%) patients received ECF and 58 (21.2%) patients received ECX. Overall median survival was 7.3 months. Treatment response and performance status were strong predictors of survival, however disease extent did not influence survival. Median survival was significantly longer in those with DPIs in the upper two quintiles than the lower 3 quintiles (9.5 months vs. 6.8 months, p=0.032). Conclusions: Outcomes achieved with palliative ECF/ECX treatment are similar to the reference clinical trials. Socioeconomic deprivation is significantly associated with reduced survival in this group of patients and is unrelated to disease extent at presentation; however it may be related to nutritional status and comorbidity and requires further investigation.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Non-infusional 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

To reduce the Hickman line-associated morbidity of continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil combined with epirubicin and cisplatin (ECF) and to investigate the need for infusional regimens, we conducted a retrospective study in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Thirty-six patients, with histologically proven irresectable gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma were given: 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 35 mg/m2 doxorubicin on day 1 and 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil on days 1 and 8 (NIACF) every 3-weeks. A median of 3 cycles was administered. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression with grade III/IV neutropenia in 47% of cycles. Neutropenic fever occurred in 5% of the cycles: non-haematological toxicity was mild and there were no treatment-related deaths. Administered dose intensity was 96.1% for doxorubicin, 93.6% for cisplatin and 90.5% for 5-fluorouracil. There were 16 partial responses and 1 complete response (overall response rate 47%, 95% confidence interval CI 31-63%); 8 patients had stable disease. Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 5 months (95% CI 4-6) and 8 months (95% CI 6-10), respectively. NIACF is a well-tolerated regimen in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma that precludes the need for central venous access, with activity similar to that observed with ECF.

Bioavailability study of oral and intravenous OGT 719, a novel nucleoside analogue with preferential activity in the liver

PURPOSE

Although oral fluoropyrimidine prodrugs are increasingly being administered in preference to intravenous nucleoside analogues in cancer chemotherapy, their activation in malignant liver tissue may be insufficient. OGT 719 (1-galactopyranosyl-5-fluorouracil) is a novel nucleoside analogue, preferentially localized in hepatocytes and hepatoma cells via the asialoglycoprotein receptor. The aim of this study was to assess the systemic bioavailability of this rationally designed drug in 16 patients with advanced solid cancers.

METHOD

Crossover pharmacokinetic study of oral (400 or 800 mg) and intravenous (250 mg/m2) OGT 719.

RESULTS

Linear pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of approximately 25% were observed at the dose levels used in this study. Like other 5-FU prodrugs, considerable interpatient variability was observed in bioavailability following oral dosing. The mean half-life for oral doses was 4 h. OGT 719 was well tolerated. No objective tumour responses were demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

The systemic bioavailability and half-life of oral OGT 719 are sufficient to merit dose escalation studies with frequent daily dosing. Subsequent efficacy studies should be performed in patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies.

A dose-finding study of raltitrexed (tomudex) with cisplatin and epirubicin in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

The standard treatment for advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer in the UK is epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluoruracil by an indwelling central venous catheter (ECF), which has significant morbidity. Raltitrexed (tomudex), a specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase with a long plasma terminal half-life (50-100 h) has activity in gastro-intestinal tract malignancy. To reduce the Hickman line-associated morbidity of ECF; we have conducted a dose-finding study of tomudex combined with epirubicin and cisplatin. Twenty-four patients (22 males, two female), median age 63 years (range 21-75), ECOG performance status < or =2 with histologically proven, unresectable or metastatic gastric (14 patients), gastro-oesophageal junction (nine patients) or oesophageal (one patient) adenocarcinoma received treatment with 3-weekly cisplatin 60 mg m(-2), epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and tomudex at doses of 2 mg m(-2), 2.5 mg m(-2) or 3 mg m(-2) in successive cohorts. Six patients were treated per dose level with no intra-patient dose escalation. Dose escalation occurred after six patients had completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy at the previous dose level. After defining the maximum tolerated dose a further six patients were treated at the preceding dose level to assess toxicity at the proposed phase II dose. A total of 102 cycles (50% completed 6 cycles) were administered. The dose-limiting toxicities are neutropenia and diarrhoea occurring in 2/6 patients at the 3 mg m(-2) dose level. Of those patients evaluable for response, there were eight partial and one complete response (overall response rate 38%). The median survival was 9.9 months. ECT is an active regimen in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The recommended dose of tomudex for further study in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin is 2.5 mg m(-2).

Tumour vasculature as a target for anticancer therapy

The development of a blood supply is crucial to the growth and metastasis of cancer. The factors involved in this are complex, however tumour hypoxia and macrophage infiltration are responsible for the synthesis of pro-angiogenic cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the fibroblast growth factors. These factors stimulate proliferation of vascular endothelial cells, the synthesis of proteases such as urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA) and the matrix metalloproteases, which result in digestion of the extracellular matrix and allow endothelial cell invasion. Endothelial cell motility is promoted by binding of extracellular matrix proteins such as vitronectin and fibronectin to integrins expressed on the plasma membrane of endothelial cells. Interfering with any of these steps may inhibit the process of angiogenesis and drugs aimed at modulation of angiogenesis are currently undergoing evaluation in early clinical studies. This paper reviews our current understanding of angiogenesis and how it may be used as a target for the treatment of cancer.

Randomized multicentre trial of filgrastim as an adjunct to combination chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. West of Scotland Lymphoma Group

This study was intended to ascertain whether the adjunctive administration of filgrastim (r metHuG-CSF, Amgen) would influence the dose intensity of chemotherapy or the morbidity of myelosuppression in patients receiving MOPP or MOPP/EVAP hybrid chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. In a prospective randomized trial, two regimens for the treatment of Hodgkin's disease were compared. The substudy described here randomized patients receiving either regimen to receive filgrastim on the days when chemotherapy was not administered. During chemotherapy, parameters of myelosuppression were documented, including dose delays, the severity and duration of neutrophil and platelet nadirs, infective episodes, and resulting hospital admissions. In the MOPP arm, 13/25 eligible patients, and, in the MOPP/EVAP arm, 12/22 eligible patients, received filgrastim. The use of filgrastim made no statistically significant difference to the administered dose intensity for either MOPP (P = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 15-point increase to 8-point reduction) or MOPP/EVAP (P = 0.53; 95% CI 7-point increase to 11-point reduction). In patients receiving MOPP, filgrastim reduced the median duration of leucopenia (P = 0.007) and the severity of the white blood cell nadir (P = 0.036); however, no statistically significant effect (at the 5% level) was seen in platelet or haemoglobin nadirs, the number of days of in-patient hospitalization, the number of admissions for infective complications, the incidence, grade or duration of infections, or the incidence of febrile neutropenia. In patients receiving MOPP/EVAP, filgrastim had no significant effect on the duration or depth of leucopenia but was associated with a reduction in the median haemoglobin (P = 0.002) and platelet nadirs (P = 0.015). No effect on the above listed sequelae of myelosuppression was influenced by the administration of filgrastim. This study, although small, suggests that the routine use of filgrastim, aimed at influencing the administered dose intensity of conventional dose chemotherapy in Hodgkin's disease, is not warranted.

Bioavailability of subcutaneous 5-fluorouracil: a case report

The optimal schedule for the administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the management of advanced colorectal cancer remains to be determined. It has been suggested that this drug may be given by the subcutaneous route and that following a short infusion the bioavailability is similar to that observed after intravenous administration. We report the results we obtained in a patient treated with an intravenous bolus of 5-FU followed by a 22-h subcutaneous infusion. In this patient the bioavailability of 5-FU given by subcutaneous infusion was 0.94. The steady-state plasma levels of 5-FU reached during subcutaneous infusion were comparable with those achieved during intravenous infusion. Following four cycles of subcutaneous therapy, painless blistering was noted at the infusion sites, which healed following the cessation of subcutaneous therapy. Further studies are required to evaluate this route of therapy as an alternative to protracted intravenous therapy. The main dose-limiting side effect appears to the local skin toxicity.