Anal canal inflammation after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The need for treatment

One technique used during restorative proctocolectomy to prevent loss of continence involves preservation of the anal canal. This technique retains a small amount of colonic mucosa and transitional mucosa that may become inflamed or develop dysplastic or neoplastic changes.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the presence and severity of anal canal inflammation and the need for treatment.

METHOD

Records of 217 patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with a stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without anal mucosectomy from 1987 through 1990 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Anal canal inflammation was evident on both endoscopy and biopsy in 48 patients (22.11 percent); 18 patients (8.29 percent) had a normal ileal pouch (9 had symptoms; 5 required topical treatment), and 30 patients (13.82 percent) had associated ileal pouch inflammation (23 with symptoms requiring systemic treatment because of pouchitis; 10 patients had concomitant topical treatment).

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic inflammation of the retained mucosa occurred in 32 (14.7 percent) patients. Nine (4.1 percent) patients had inflammation of the anal canal alone, and 23 (10.6 percent) had pouchitis in addition. The need for treatment occurred in 28 (12.9 percent) of the total ((2.3 percent) patients with anal canal inflammation and 23 (10.6 percent) with anal canal inflammation plus pouchitis).

Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of dysplasia in the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Preservation of the anal transitional zone (ATZ) after restorative proctocolectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis is controversial.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and treatment options for dysplasia and/or cancer after restorative proctocolectomy and stapled IPAA.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all 254 patients operated on for ulcerative colitis who had a restorative proctocolectomy, stapled IPAA, and annual postoperative biopsies of ATZ. Follow-up studies included an annual questionnaire and physical examination.

RESULTS

During a follow-up of 2.3 +/- 1.4 (mean +/- standard deviation) years, low-grade dysplasia was found in eight patients (3.1 percent), 16 (median: range, 6-56) months after surgery. Repeated biopsies revealed dysplasia in only two of eight patients, and completion mucosectomy was performed. Dysplasia in ATZ was associated with a preoperative (P = 0.02) or postoperative (P = 0.04) pathologic diagnosis of ulcerative colitis with concurrent dysplasia or cancer. No association (P > 0.05) was found between dysplasia and the following: age, sex, preoperative length of disease, use of a double-stapled versus single-stapled technique, or anastomotic distance from the dentate line.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of low-grade dysplasia in ATZ was low. Restorative proctocolectomy with total mucosectomy of the anal canal and handsewn IPAA is recommended for patients with preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and concurrent cancer or dysplasia. Frequent follow-up with biopsies is recommended for patients with incidental finding of cancer or high-grade dysplasia after restorative proctocolectomy and stapled IPAA with preservation of ATZ. For persistent or recurrent low-grade dysplasia, we recommend a completion mucosectomy.

Prospective randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery

A total of 149 patients admitted for elective colorectal surgery were randomly allocated to receive preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (group 1) or no mechanical bowel preparation (group 2). All patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis with cephalothin and metronidazole. The overall incidence of wound infection was 17.4 per cent (24 per cent for group 1, 12 per cent for group 2) and that of dehiscence 7.4 per cent (10 per cent for group 1, 5 per cent for group 2). The incidence of wound infection was significantly higher in group 1 (P < 0.05) but that of anastomotic dehiscence did not differ significantly between groups. Mechanical bowel preparation is unnecessary and may be harmful in terms of preventing wound infection and anastomotic dehiscence in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.