[Acute jaw-thoracic pain and syncope in a 41-year-old man]

A 41-year-old physically active man with no significant past medical history presented with sudden thoracic pain. The patient was referred to the next tertiary care hospital. A CT scan showed an ectasia of the ascending aorta with irregularities of the aortic wall without dissection. Despite initial refusal, the patient was referred to a university hospital with experience in aortic surgery. A triphase ECG-synchronized cardiothoracic flash protocol performed on a 256 line CT scanner confirmed an aortic intramural hematoma and a covered aortic perforation. Shortly afterwards the patient collapsed and had to be resuscitated.

Effects of the ABO-mismatch between donor and recipient of cryopreserved arterial homografts

AIM

Cryopreserved arterial homograft (CAH) is a well-established substitute material for in situ reconstruction of vascular infections. However, their degeneration remains serious complication. Although several studies propose ABO-mismatching between CAH-donor and -recipient as the main reason, the results are controversial. We compared the outcome between ABO-compatible and ABO-incompatible CAH recipients to evaluate the contribution of ABO-mismatching.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2007, a retrospective review in 32 patients who underwent CAH-implantation was performed. The patients were divided in ABO-incompatible (group A: 17/32 patients; 53%) and ABO-compatible (group B: 15/32 patients; 47%) to CAH donor. Leucocytes, platelets and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were recorded during the in-hospital stay. These were correlated with the surface of implanted homograft (SIH). Mid-term survival- and freedom-from-reoperation (FFR) rates were also calculated.

RESULTS

In both groups, peak of leucocytes and CRP was recorded on third postoperative day (POD3) and regarding platelets lowest values on POD1. Interestingly, a second CRP-peak was reported on POD8 in group A (A: 172±104mg/L vs. B: 75±55mg/L, P=0.01). No relationship between second CRP-peak and SIH was found. After 27 months median follow-up (range, 5-49 months), survival- (65% vs. 84%, P=0.28) and FFR-rates (94% vs. 93%, P=0.98) remained comparable.

CONCLUSION

We consider that the second CRP-peak expresses an early cytoimmunologic response of ABO-incompatible recipients against CAH. However, we did not find any relationship between ABO-incompatibility and poor mid-term outcome in terms of reoperation or mortality. Longer surveillance of our patients is mandatory.

Carotid endarterectomy with or without concomitant aortocoronary bypass in elderly patients: an analysis of 599 procedures

AIM

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been established as an effective treatment of carotid artery disease. Controversial remains the performance of CEA in elderly patients. Aim of this study is to report the mid-term (30 days) neurological outcome in patients older than 75 years after CEA with or without simultaneous aortocoronary bypass (CABG).

METHODS

599 patients undergoing CEA from January 2000 to December 2007 were enrolled. Isolated CEA was performed in 398/599 (66%) patients (group A). In 201/599(34%) patients (group B) was performed a combined procedure (CEA/CABG). 90/398(23%) patients of group A (group A1) and 49/201(24%) patients of group B (group B1) were >75 years old. 308/398 (77%) patients of group A (group A2) and 152/201 (76%) patients of group B (group B2) were <75 years old. Mortality, TIA and stroke rates as well as pre- and postoperative Rankin scale (RS) were reported.

RESULTS

In isolated CEAs, mortality was higher in group A1 (A1:1.1% vs A2:0%, P=0.51). We found no significant differences in rates of TIA (A1:4.4% versus A2:3.2%, P=0.79) or stroke (A1:2.2% versus A2:1.9%, P=0.98). In CEA/CABG, mortality was 0% in group B1 and 5.9% in group B2 (P=0.17). No significant differences in rates of TIA (B1:2% versus B2:3%, P=0.76) or stroke (B1:2% versus B2:5%, P=0.70) were reported. Preoperative RS was the only positive predictor for postoperative stroke in groups A1 (P=0.02) and B1 (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

CEA is an appropriate and safe procedure in elderly patients. Under consideration should be the performance of CEA in elderly patients with high preoperative RS.