1
|
Edwards KA, Lii T, Schouten TD, Kearney KM, Ziadni MS, Darnall BD, Mackey SC, Gilam G. Is There an Association Between Lateralization of Chronic Pain in the Body and Depression? J Pain 2024:S1526-5900(24)00371-7. [PMID: 38341013 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Depression commonly co-occurs with chronic pain and can worsen pain outcomes. Recent theoretical work has hypothesized that pain localized to the left hemibody is a risk factor for worse depression due to overlap in underlying neural substrates. This hypothesis has not been tested a priori. Using a large sample of treatment-seeking adults with mixed-etiology chronic pain (N = 1,185), our cross-sectional study tested whether patients with left-sided pain endorse worse depressive symptoms. We also examined differences in other pain-related functioning measures. We tested 4 comparisons based on painful body areas using the CHOIR body map: 1) only left-sided (OL) versus any right-sided pain; 2) only right-sided (OR) versus any left-sided pain; 3) OL versus OR versus bilateral pain; and 4) more left-sided versus more right-sided versus equal-sided pain. Analysis of variance models showed OL pain was not associated with worse depression (F = 5.50, P = .019). Any left-sided pain was associated with worse depression, though the effect was small (F = 8.58, P = .003, Cohens d = .29). Bilateral pain was associated with worse depression (F = 8.05, P < .001, Cohens d = .24-.33). Regardless of pain location, more body areas endorsed was associated with greater depression. Although a more rigorous assessment of pain laterality is needed, our findings do not support the hypothesis that left-lateralized pain is associated with worse depression. PERSPECTIVE: Pain lateralized to the left side of the body has been hypothesized as a risk factor for worse depression in chronic pain, despite never being tested in a large, real-world sample of patients with chronic pain. Findings showed that more widespread pain, not pain laterality, was associated with worse depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlyn A Edwards
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Theresa Lii
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Troy D Schouten
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Katherine M Kearney
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Gadi Gilam
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Darnall BD, Burns JW, Hong J, Roy A, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Ziadni MS, You DS, Jung C, Cook KF, Lorig K, Tian L, Mackey SC. Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial. Pain Rep 2024; 9:e1116. [PMID: 38288134 PMCID: PMC10824382 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We previously conducted a 3-arm randomized trial (263 adults with chronic low back pain) which compared group-based (1) single-session pain relief skills intervention (Empowered Relief; ER); (2) 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic back pain; and (3) single-session health and back pain education class (HE). Results suggested non-inferiority of ER vs. CBT at 3 months post-treatment on an array of outcomes. Methods Here, we tested the durability of treatment effects at 6 months post-treatment. We examined group differences in primary and secondary outcomes at 6 months and the degree to which outcomes eroded or improved from 3-month to 6-month within each treatment group. Results Empowered Relief remained non-inferior to CBT on most outcomes, whereas both ER and CBT remained superior to HE on most outcomes. Outcome improvements within ER did not decrease significantly from 3-month to 6-month, and indeed ER showed additional 3- to 6-month improvements on pain catastrophizing, pain bothersomeness, and anxiety. Effects of ER at 6 months post-treatment (moderate term outcomes) kept pace with effects reported by participants who underwent 8-session CBT. Conclusions The maintenance of these absolute levels implies strong stability of ER effects. Results extend to 6 months post-treatment previous findings documenting that ER and CBT exhibit similarly potent effects on outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D. Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - John W. Burns
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Juliette Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Anuradha Roy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Kristin Slater
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Heather Poupore-King
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Dokyoung S. You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Corinne Jung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Kate Lorig
- Department of Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Lu Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science and (by courtesy) Statistics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sean C. Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
You DS, Cook KF, Lannon EW, Ziadni MS, Darnall BD, Mackey SC. Establishing the interpretability and utility of the 4-item BriefPCS. Sci Rep 2023; 13:21272. [PMID: 38042937 PMCID: PMC10693612 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48433-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023] Open
Abstract
To reduce the patient burden associated with completing the 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the 4-item "BriefPCS" was developed. To date, no crosswalk has been developed that associates scores on the BriefPCS with PCS scores. Further, no study has compared the use of BriefPCS and PCS scores in a randomized clinical trial (RCT). We aimed to: (1) establish the interpretability of BriefPCS scores in reference to PCS scores, (2) compare the concurrent validity between the BriefPCS and PCS, and (3) asssess the use of BriefPCS in an RCT. First, we conducted equipercentile linking, created a crosswalk that associated scores of BriefPCS with PCS, and calculated differences between PCS and crosswalked PCS scores. Secondly, we compared Bootstrap correlation coefficients between PCS and self-reported measures of other domains. Lastly, we compared results from an RCT using BriefPCS scores versus PCS scores. Findings indicated that the correlation coefficient estimates with the BriefPCS and PCS scores were not significantly different. BriefPCS and PCS scores had similar ability to detect treatment-related changes. The BriefPCS scores validly, reliably, and accurately distinguish levels of pain catastrophizing. Additionally, the BriefPCS scores are sensitive to changes after behavioral interventions, with less respondent burden compared to the PCS scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung S You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Karon F Cook
- Feral Scholars, 257 County Road 4754, Broaddus, TX, 75929, USA
| | - Edward W Lannon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ziadni MS, Jaros S, Anderson SR, You DS, Darnall BD, Mackey SC. A Longitudinal Investigation of the Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With Chronic Pain. J Pain 2023; 24:1830-1842. [PMID: 37225065 PMCID: PMC10201913 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unexpected changes in the healthcare system. This current longitudinal study had 2 aims: 1) describe the trajectory of pandemic-associated stressors and patient-reported health outcomes among patients receiving treatment at a tertiary pain clinic over 2 years (May 2020 to June 2022); and 2) identify vulnerable subgroups. We assessed changes in pandemic-associated stressors and patient-reported health outcome measures. The study sample included 1270 adult patients who were predominantly female (74.6%), White (66.2%), non-Hispanic (80.6%), married (66.1%), not on disability (71.2%), college-educated (59.45%), and not currently working (57.9%). We conducted linear mixed effect modeling to examine the main effect of time with controlling for a random intercept. Findings revealed a significant main effect of time for all pandemic-associated stressors except financial impact. Over time, patients reported increased proximity to COVID-19, but decreased pandemic-associated stressors. A significant improvement was also observed in pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and PROMIS-pain interference, sleep, anxiety, anger, and depression scores. Demographic-based subgroup analyses for pandemic-associated stressors revealed that younger adults, Hispanics, Asians, and patients receiving disability compensation were vulnerable groups either during the initial visit or follow-up visits. We observed additional differential pandemic effects between groups based on participant sex, education level, and working status. In conclusion, despite unanticipated changes in pain care services during the pandemic, patients receiving pain treatments adjusted to pandemic-related stressors and improved their health status over time. As the current study observed differential pandemic impacts on patient subgroups, future studies should investigate and address the unmet needs of vulnerable subgroups. PERSPECTIVE: Over a 2-year timeframe, the pandemic did not adversely influence physical and mental health among treatment-seeking patients with chronic pain. Patients reported small but significant improvements across indices of physical and psychosocial health. Differential impacts emerged among groups based on ethnicity, age, disability status, gender, education level, and working status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sam Jaros
- Department of Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Steven R Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Dokyoung S You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Krohner S, Yamin JB, Ziadni MS, Carty McIntosh JN, Schubiner H, Lumley MA. Emotional Awareness and Expression Interview: Examining Interview Content and Patient Experiences in Two Medical Samples. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2023; 30:520-530. [PMID: 36190608 PMCID: PMC10122833 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-022-09913-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A single session of Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET)-the EAET Interview-was previously shown to lead to clinical benefits for patients with centralized somatic conditions in primary care (Ziadni et al. in Health Psychol 37(3):282-290, 2018) and tertiary care (Carty et al. in Pain Med 20(7):1321-1329, 2019) settings. There has yet to be an examination of patients' experiences of and reactions to the EAET Interview, which is crucial in evaluating possible clinical implementation of the interview. We conducted secondary analyses on 88 patients (M age = 41.32, 90.9% women) from the two prior trials (primary care N = 51; tertiary care N = 37). Analyses examined interview processes (stress disclosure themes, working alliance, and emotional processing) and patients' reactions to the interview (interview credibility and perceived value of the interview), comparing the two samples and examining correlations among these variables. All patients disclosed at least one stressful life experience, commonly interpersonal problems (89.2%) and childhood adversity (51.5%). Patients had moderately high levels of working alliance and emotional processing during the interview and reported high interview credibility and perceived value of the interview. More extensive emotional processing of stressors was associated with more positive patient reactions to the interview, including higher interview credibility (r = .23) and perceived value (r = .32). We conclude that the single-session EAET Interview was valued by most patients, and patients' emotional processing is particularly beneficial. Addressing the trauma and emotional conflicts of patients with centralized somatic conditions is both feasible and valuable in front-line medical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoshana Krohner
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jolin B Yamin
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Howard Schubiner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ascension Health/Providence Park Hospital, Michigan State University, Southfield, MI, USA
| | - Mark A Lumley
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
You DS, Hettie G, Darnall BD, Ziadni MS. Spontaneous self-affirmation: an adaptive coping strategy for people with chronic pain. Scand J Pain 2023; 23:531-538. [PMID: 36935574 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Self-affirmation may be a promising treatment strategy for improving clinical outcomes. This study examined the association between self-affirmation and self-reported health status among people with chronic pain. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, 768 treatment seeking people (female 67.2%, mean age=50.4 years with SD of 17.1, White/Caucasian 59.9%) completed surveys using a learning healthcare system. Measures included spontaneous self-affirmation (SSA) items, PROMIS® outcome measures, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Multiple regressions were conducted to examine if strength-based SSA, value-based SSA, and their interaction would predict perceived health status and pain coping strategy. Sensitivity analysis was done by performing additional regressions with covariates (age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education). Lastly, exploratory analysis examined if average SSA scores would have a linear relationship with perceived health status. RESULTS The strength x value-based SSA interaction significantly predicted the PROMIS-depression, anxiety, and social isolation T-scores (ps≤0.007), but not anger T-scores (p=0.067). Specifically, greater tendency to use both SSA styles predicted less symptoms of depression, anxiety and social isolation. This interaction remained significant when controlling for the covariates. The two SSA styles and their interaction did not significantly predict pain interference, sleep disturbance, fatigue, average pain rating and PCS scores (ps≥0.054). Exploratory analysis revealed SSA average scores did not have a significant linear relationship with perceived health status. CONCLUSIONS The current study showed self-affirmation as being associated with better psychosocial health, but not associated with physical health and pain catastrophizing among patients with chronic pain. Our findings suggested the potential benefit of incorporating strength- and value-based affirmations in pain intervention approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung S You
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Gabrielle Hettie
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Darnall BD, Edwards KA, Courtney RE, Ziadni MS, Simons LE, Harrison LE. Innovative treatment formats, technologies, and clinician trainings that improve access to behavioral pain treatment for youth and adults. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2023; 4:1223172. [PMID: 37547824 PMCID: PMC10397413 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1223172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is prevalent across the life span and associated with significant individual and societal costs. Behavioral interventions are recommended as the gold-standard, evidence-based interventions for chronic pain, but barriers, such as lack of pain-trained clinicians, poor insurance coverage, and high treatment burden, limit patients' ability to access evidenced-based pain education and treatment resources. Recent advances in technology offer new opportunities to leverage innovative digital formats to overcome these barriers and dramatically increase access to high-quality, evidenced-based pain treatments for youth and adults. This scoping review highlights new advances. First, we describe system-level barriers to the broad dissemination of behavioral pain treatment. Next, we review several promising new pediatric and adult pain education and treatment technology innovations to improve access and scalability of evidence-based behavioral pain treatments. Current challenges and future research and clinical recommendations are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D. Darnall
- Stanford Pain Relief Innovations Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Karlyn A. Edwards
- Stanford Pain Relief Innovations Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Rena E. Courtney
- Salem VA Health Care System, PREVAIL Center for Chronic Pain, Salem, VA, United States
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Laura E. Simons
- Biobehavioral Pediatric Pain Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Lauren E. Harrison
- Biobehavioral Pediatric Pain Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang M, Cooley C, Ziadni MS, Mackey I, Flood P. Association between history of childbirth and chronic, functionally significant back pain in later life. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:4. [PMID: 36597120 PMCID: PMC9809019 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-02023-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Back pain is more prevalent among women than men. The association with sex could be related to pregnancy and childbirth, unique female conditions. This association has not been thoroughly evaluated. METHODS Using a retrospective cohort design, we evaluated the relationship between history of childbirth on the prevalence and severity of functionally consequential back pain in 1069 women from a tertiary care pain management clinic. Interactions among preexisting, acute peripartum, and subsequent back pain were evaluated as secondary outcomes among the parous women using logistic and linear regression as appropriate. RESULTS The women who had given birth had a higher risk for functionally significant back pain compared to women who had not given birth (85% vs 77%, p < 0.001, Risk Ratio 1.11 [1.04-1.17]). The association was preserved after correction for age, weight, and race. Back pain was also more slightly severe (Numerical Rating Score for Pain 7[5-8] vs 6[5-7] out of 10, p = 0.002). Women who recalled severe, acute postpartum back pain had a higher prevalence of current debilitating back pain (89% vs 75%, Risk Ratio 1.19 (1.08-1.31), p = 0.001). Twenty-eight percent of acute postpartum back pain never resolved and 40% reported incomplete resolution. CONCLUSIONS A history of pregnancy and childbirth is a risk factor for chronic functionally significant back pain in women. Severe acute postpartum back pain is a risk factor for future disability suggesting that the peripartum period may provide an important opportunity for intervention. Early recognition and management may mitigate future disability. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov as "Association Between Chronic Headache and Back Pain with Childbirth" (NCT04091321) on 16/09/2019 before it was initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Zhang
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA ,grid.34477.330000000122986657Present address: UW Internal Medicine Residency Program, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-6421 USA
| | - Corinne Cooley
- grid.490568.60000 0004 5997 482XStanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California USA
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Dr, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
| | - Ian Mackey
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Dr, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
| | - Pamela Flood
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Dr, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ziadni MS, Sturgeon JA, Lumley MA. "Pain, Stress, and Emotions": Uncontrolled trial of a single-session, telehealth, emotional awareness and expression therapy class for patients with chronic pain. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2022; 3:1028561. [PMID: 36466215 PMCID: PMC9715975 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1028561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Trauma- and emotion-focused chronic pain interventions, particularly Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET), show much promise for reducing pain and improving functioning. We developed a novel, single-session, telehealth-delivered EAET class ("Pain, Stress, and Emotions"; PSE) and tested it on adults with chronic pain of mixed etiology. Methods After an initial developmental phase, we conducted an uncontrolled trial, providing PSE to 74 individuals with chronic pain (63.5% female; 64.9% White; 60.8% with pain duration >5 years) in four class administrations. Participants completed self-report measures (primary outcomes: pain intensity and pain interference) at baseline and multiple follow-ups to 12 weeks. Linear mixed-models examined changes over time, and effect sizes were calculated on change from baseline to 4-week (primary endpoint) and 12-week follow-ups. The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05014126). Results Participants reported high satisfaction with the PSE class. Pain intensity showed a significant, medium reduction across time (p < .001; d = 0.60 at 4 weeks); one-quarter of participants had clinically meaningful pain reduction (≥30%). Pain interference had a large reduction (p < .001; d = 0.74). There were significant but smaller improvements in most secondary outcomes (ds = 0.15 to 0.55; ps < .01). Effects were generally maintained or increased at 12-week follow-up. Higher education and baseline ambivalence over emotional expression predicted greater pain reductions. Conclusions People taking this EAET class had reduced pain severity and interference and improvements in other pain-related outcomes. The single-session, telehealth class holds promise as an easily delivered, efficient, and potentially impactful intervention for some patients with chronic pain, although controlled trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S. Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States,Correspondence: Maisa Ziadni
| | - John A. Sturgeon
- Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Mark A. Lumley
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ziadni MS, You DS, Keane R, Salazar B, Jaros S, Ram J, Roy A, Tanner N, Salmasi V, Gardner M, Darnall BD. "My Surgical Success": Feasibility and Impact of a Single-Session Digital Behavioral Pain Medicine Intervention on Pain Intensity, Pain Catastrophizing, and Time to Opioid Cessation After Orthopedic Trauma Surgery-A Randomized Trial. Anesth Analg 2022; 135:394-405. [PMID: 35696706 PMCID: PMC9259046 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Behavioral pain treatments may improve postsurgical analgesia and recovery; however, effective and scalable options are not widely available. This study tested a digital perioperative behavioral medicine intervention in orthopedic trauma surgery patients for feasibility and efficacy for reducing pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and opioid cessation up to 3 months after surgery. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at an orthopedic trauma surgery unit at a major academic hospital to compare a digital behavioral pain management intervention (“My Surgical Success” [MSS]) to a digital general health education (HE) intervention (HE; no pain management skills). The enrolled sample included 133 patients; 84 patients were randomized (MSS, n = 37; HE, n = 47) and completed study procedures. Most patients received their assigned intervention within 3 days of surgery (85%). The sample was predominantly male (61.5%), White (61.9%), and partnered (65.5%), with at least a bachelor’s degree (69.0%). Outcomes were collected at 1–3 months after intervention through self-report e-surveys and electronic medical record review; an intention-to-treat analytic framework was applied. Feasibility was dually determined by the proportion of patients engaging in their assigned treatment and an application of an 80% threshold for patient-reported acceptability. We hypothesized that MSS would result in greater reductions in pain intensity and pain catastrophizing after surgery and earlier opioid cessation compared to the digital HE control group. RESULTS: The engagement rate with assigned interventions was 63% and exceeded commonly reported rates for fully automated Internet-based e-health interventions. Feasibility was demonstrated for the MSS engagers, with >80% reporting treatment acceptability. Overall, both groups improved in the postsurgical months across all study variables. A significant interaction effect was found for treatment group over time on pain intensity, such that the MSS group evidenced greater absolute reductions in pain intensity after surgery and up to 3 months later (treatment × time fixed effects; F[215] = 5.23; P = .024). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for time to opioid cessation or for reductions in pain catastrophizing (F[215] = 0.20; P = .653), although the study sample notably had subclinical baseline pain catastrophizing scores (M = 14.10; 95% confidence interval, 11.70–16.49). CONCLUSIONS: Study findings revealed that a fully automated behavioral pain management skills intervention (MSS) may be useful for motivated orthopedic trauma surgery patients and reduce postsurgical pain up to 3 months. MSS was not associated with reduced time to opioid cessation compared to the HE control intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Dokyoung S You
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ryan Keane
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Brett Salazar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
| | - Sam Jaros
- Department of Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jesmin Ram
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Anuradha Roy
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Natalie Tanner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
| | - Vafi Salmasi
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Michael Gardner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
| | - Beth D Darnall
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ziadni MS, You DS, Cramer EM, Anderson SR, Hettie G, Darnall BD, Mackey SC. The impact of COVID-19 on patients with chronic pain seeking care at a tertiary pain clinic. Sci Rep 2022; 12:6435. [PMID: 35440688 PMCID: PMC9017421 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10431-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Empirical data on the health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic remain scarce, especially among patients with chronic pain. We conducted a cross-sectional study matched by season to examine patient-reported health symptoms among patients with chronic pain pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic onset. Survey responses were analyzed from 7535 patients during their initial visit at a tertiary pain clinic between April 2017-October 2020. Surveys included measures of pain and pain-related physical, emotional, and social function. The post-COVID-19 onset cohort included 1798 initial evaluations, and the control pre-COVID-19 cohort included 5737 initial evaluations. Patients were majority female, White/Caucasian, and middle-aged. The results indicated that pain ratings remained unchanged among patients after the pandemic onset. However, pain catastrophizing scores were elevated when COVID-19 cases peaked in July 2020. Pain interference, physical function, sleep impairment, and emotional support were improved in the post-COVID-19 cohort. Depression, anxiety, anger, and social isolation remained unchanged. Our findings provide evidence of encouraging resilience among patients seeking treatment for pain conditions in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, our findings that pain catastrophizing increased when COVID-19 cases peaked in July 2020 suggests that future monitoring and consideration of the impacts of the pandemic on patients' pain is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Dokyoung S You
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Eric M Cramer
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Steven R Anderson
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Gabrielle Hettie
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
You DS, Ziadni MS, Hettie G, Darnall BD, Cook KF, Von Korff MR, Mackey SC. Comparing Perceived Pain Impact Between Younger and Older Adults With High Impact Chronic Pain: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative and Quantitative Survey. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2022; 3:850713. [PMID: 35465295 PMCID: PMC9030949 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.850713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
High impact chronic pain (HICP) is a recently proposed concept for treatment stratifying patients with chronic pain and monitoring their progress. The goal is to reduce the impact of chronic pain on the individual, their family, and society. The US National Pain Strategy defined HICP as the chronic pain associated with substantial restrictions on participation in work, social, and self-care activities for at least 6 months. To understand the meaning and characteristics of HICP from the younger (<65 years old) and older adults (≥65 years old) with chronic pain, our study examined patients' perceived pain impact between the two age groups. We also characterize the degree of pain impact, assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI), between adults and older adults with HICP. We recruited patients at a tertiary pain clinic. The survey included open-ended questions about pain impact, the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised to identify patients' meeting criteria for HICP, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) 8-item PI short form (v.8a). A total of 55 younger adults (65.5% women, 72.7% HICP, mean age = 55.0 with SD of 16.2) and 28 older adults (53.6% women, 64.3% HICP, mean age = 72.6 with SD of 5.4) with chronic pain participated in this study. In response to an open-ended question in which participants were asked to list out the areas of major impact pain, those with HICP in the younger group most commonly listed work, social activity, and basic physical activity (e.g., walking and standing); for those in the older group, basic physical activity, instrumental activity of daily living (e.g., housework, grocery shopping), and participating in social or fun activity for older adults with HICP were the most common. A 2 × 2 ANOVA was conducted using age (younger adults vs. older adults) and HICP classification (HICP vs. No HICP). A statistically significant difference was found in the PROMIS-PI T-scores by HICP status (HICP: M = 58.4, SD = 6.3; No HICP: M = 67.8, SD = 6.3), but not by age groups with HICP. In conclusion, perceived pain impacts were qualitatively, but not quantitatively different between younger and older adults with HICP. We discuss limitations and offer recommendations for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung S. You
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Gabrielle Hettie
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Beth D. Darnall
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | - Michael R. Von Korff
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sean C. Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States,*Correspondence: Sean C. Mackey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
You DS, Ziadni MS, Cooley CE, Talavera DC, Mackey SC, Poupore-King H. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in real-world patients with chronic back pain: A pilot cohort data analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2021; 34:965-973. [PMID: 34151829 PMCID: PMC8673504 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-200305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized clinical trials (RCT) suggest a multidisciplinary approach to pain rehabilitation is superior to other active treatments in improving pain intensity, function, disability, and pain interference for patients with chronic pain, with small effect size (ds= 0.20-0.36) but its effectiveness remains unknown in real-world practice. OBJECTIVE The current study examined the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary program to a cognitive and behavioral therapy (pain-CBT) in real-world patients with chronic back pain. METHODS Twenty-eight patients (M𝑎𝑔𝑒= 57.6, 82.1% Female) completed a multidisciplinary program that included pain psychology and physical therapy. Eighteen patients (M𝑎𝑔𝑒= 58.9, 77.8% Female) completed a CBT-alone program. Using a learning healthcare system, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, 0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® measures were administered before and after the programs. RESULTS We found significant improvement in mobility and pain behavior only after a multidisciplinary program (p's < 0.031; d= 0.69 and 0.55). We also found significant improvement in pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, social role satisfaction, and pain catastrophizing after pain-CBT or multidisciplinary programs (p's < 0.037; ds = 0.29-0.73). Pain ratings were not significantly changed by either program (p's > 0.207). CONCLUSIONS The effect of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program observed in RCT would be generalizable to real-world practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung S. You
- Corresponding author: Dokyoung S. You, Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Tel.: +1 650 724 9320; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ziadni MS, Gonzalez-Castro L, Anderson S, Krishnamurthy P, Darnall BD. Efficacy of a Single-Session "Empowered Relief" Zoom-Delivered Group Intervention for Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e29672. [PMID: 34505832 PMCID: PMC8463950 DOI: 10.2196/29672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioral therapy-pain is an evidence-based treatment for chronic pain that can have significant patient burden, including health care cost, travel, multiple sessions, and lack of access in remote areas. OBJECTIVE The study aims to pilot test the efficacy of a single-session videoconference-delivered empowered relief (ER) intervention compared to waitlist control (WLC) conditions among individuals with chronic pain. We hypothesized that ER would be superior to WLC in reducing pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and other pain-related outcomes at 1-3 months posttreatment. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving a web-based sample of adults (N=104) aged 18-80 years with self-reported chronic pain. Participants were randomized (1:1) to 1 of 2 unblinded study groups: ER (50/104, 48.1%) and WLC (54/104, 51.9%). Participants allocated to ER completed a Zoom-delivered class, and all participants completed follow-up surveys at 2 weeks and 1, 2, and 3 months posttreatment. All the study procedures were performed remotely and electronically. The primary outcome was pain catastrophizing 1-month posttreatment, with pain intensity, pain bothersomeness, and sleep disruption as secondary outcomes. We also report a more rigorous test of the durability of treatment effects at 3 months posttreatment. Data were collected from September 2020 to February 2021 and analyzed using intention-to-treat analysis. The analytic data set included participants (18/101, 17.8% clinic patients; 83/101, 82.1% community) who completed at least one study survey: ER (50/101, 49.5%) and WLC (51/104, 49%). RESULTS Participants (N=101) were 69.3% (70/101) female, with a mean age of 49.76 years (SD 13.90; range 24-78); 32.7% (33/101) had an undergraduate degree and self-reported chronic pain for 3 months. Participants reported high engagement (47/50, 94%), high satisfaction with ER (mean 8.26, SD 1.57; range 0-10), and high satisfaction with the Zoom platform (46/50, 92%). For the between-groups factor, ER was superior to WLC for all primary and secondary outcomes at 3 months posttreatment (highest P<.001), and between-groups Cohen d effect sizes ranged from 0.45 to 0.79, indicating that the superiority was of moderate to substantial clinical importance. At 3 months, clinically meaningful pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) reductions were found for ER but not for WLC (ER: PCS -8.72, 42.25% reduction; WLC: PCS -2.25, 11.13% reduction). ER resulted in significant improvements in pain intensity, sleep disturbance, and clinical improvements in pain bothersomeness. CONCLUSIONS Zoom-delivered ER had high participant satisfaction and very high engagement. Among adults with chronic pain, this single-session, Zoom-delivered, skills-based pain class resulted in clinically significant improvement across a range of pain-related outcomes that was sustained at 3 months. Web-based delivery of ER could allow greater accessibility of home-based pain treatment and could address the inconveniences and barriers faced by patients when attempting to receive in-person care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04546685; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04546685.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Steven Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gilam G, Cramer EM, Webber KA, Ziadni MS, Kao MC, Mackey SC. Classifying chronic pain using multidimensional pain-agnostic symptom assessments and clustering analysis. Sci Adv 2021; 7:eabj0320. [PMID: 34516888 PMCID: PMC8442889 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abj0320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain conditions present in various forms, yet all feature symptomatic impairments in physical, mental, and social domains. Rather than assessing symptoms as manifestations of illness, we used them to develop a chronic pain classification system. A cohort of real-world treatment-seeking patients completed a multidimensional patient-reported registry as part of a routine initial evaluation in a multidisciplinary academic pain clinic. We applied hierarchical clustering on a training subset of 11,448 patients using nine pain-agnostic symptoms. We then validated a three-cluster solution reflecting a graded scale of severity across all symptoms and eight independent pain-specific measures in additional subsets of 3817 and 1273 patients. Negative affect–related factors were key determinants of cluster assignment. The smallest subset included follow-up assessments that were predicted by baseline cluster assignment. Findings provide a cost-effective classification system that promises to improve clinical care and alleviate suffering by providing putative markers for personalized diagnosis and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gadi Gilam
- Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Eric M. Cramer
- Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth A. Webber
- Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Ming-Chih Kao
- Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sean C. Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
You DS, Cook KF, Domingue BW, Ziadni MS, Hah JM, Darnall BD, Mackey SC. Customizing CAT Administration of the PROMIS Misuse of Prescription Pain Medication Item Bank for Patients with Chronic Pain. Pain Med 2021; 22:1669-1675. [PMID: 33944948 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The 22-item PROMIS®-Rx Pain Medication Misuse item bank (Bank-22) imposes a high response burden. This study aimed to characterize the performance of the Bank-22 in a computer adaptive testing (CAT) setting based on varied stopping rules. METHODS The 22 items were administered to 288 patients. We performed a CAT simulation using default stopping rules (CATPROMIS). In 5 other simulations, a "best health" response rule was added to decrease response burden. This rule stopped CAT administration when a participant selected "never" to a specified number of initial Bank-22 items (2-6 in this study, designated CATAlt2-Alt6). The Bank-22 and 7-item short form (SF-7) scores were compared to scores based on CATPROMIS, and the 5 CAT variations. RESULTS Bank-22 scores correlated highly with the SF-7 and CATPROMIS, Alt5, Alt6 scores (r=0.87-0.95) and moderately with CATAlt2- Alt4 scores (r=0.63-0.74). In all CAT conditions, the greatest differences with Bank-22 scores were at the lower end of misuse T-scores. The smallest differences with Bank-22 and CATPROMIS scores were observed with CATAlt5 and CATAlt6. Compared to the SF-7, CATAlt5 and CATAlt6 reduced overall response burden by about 42%. Finally, the correlations between PROMIS-Rx Misuse and Anxiety T-scores remained relatively unchanged across the conditions (r=0.31-0.43, Ps < .001). CONCLUSIONS Applying a stopping rule based on number of initial "best health" responses reduced response burden for respondents with lower levels of misuse. The tradeoff was less measurement precision for those individuals, which could be an acceptable tradeoff when the chief concern is in discriminating higher levels of misuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung S You
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | - Benjamin W Domingue
- Stanford University Graduate School of Education, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jennifer M Hah
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Darnall BD, Roy A, Chen AL, Ziadni MS, Keane RT, You DS, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Mackey I, Kao MC, Cook KF, Lorig K, Zhang D, Hong J, Tian L, Mackey SC. Comparison of a Single-Session Pain Management Skills Intervention With a Single-Session Health Education Intervention and 8 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2113401. [PMID: 34398206 PMCID: PMC8369357 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Chronic low back pain (CLBP), the most prevalent chronic pain condition, imparts substantial disability and discomfort. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) reduces the effect of CLBP, but access is limited. OBJECTIVE To determine whether a single class in evidence-based pain management skills (empowered relief) is noninferior to 8-session CBT and superior to health education at 3 months after treatment for improving pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, pain interference, and other secondary outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This 3-arm randomized clinical trial collected data from May 24, 2017, to March 3, 2020. Participants included individuals in the community with self-reported CLBP for 6 months or more and an average pain intensity of at least 4 (range, 0-10, with 10 indicating worst pain imaginable). Data were analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to (1) empowered relief, (2) health education (matched to empowered relief for duration and format), or (3) 8-session CBT. Self-reported data were collected at baseline, before treatment, and at posttreatment months 1, 2, and 3. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Group differences in Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores and secondary outcomes at month 3 after treatment. Pain intensity and pain interference were priority secondary outcomes. RESULTS A total of 263 participants were included in the analysis (131 women [49.8%], 130 men [49.4%], and 2 other [0.8%]; mean [SD] age, 47.9 [13.8] years) and were randomized into 3 groups: empowered relief (n = 87), CBT (n = 88), and health education (n = 88). Empowered relief was noninferior to CBT for pain catastrophizing scores at 3 months (difference from CBT, 1.39 [97.5% CI, -∞ to 4.24]). Empowered relief and CBT were superior to health education for pain catastrophizing scores (empowered relief difference from health education, -5.90 [95% CI, -8.78 to -3.01; P < .001]; CBT difference from health education, -7.29 [95% CI, -10.20 to -4.38; P < .001]). Pain catastrophizing score reductions for empowered relief and CBT at 3 months after treatment were clinically meaningful (empowered relief, -9.12 [95% CI, -11.6 to -6.67; P < .001]; CBT, -10.94 [95% CI, -13.6 to -8.32; P < .001]; health education, -4.60 [95% CI, -7.18 to -2.01; P = .001]). Between-group comparisons for pain catastrophizing at months 1 to 3 were adjusted for baseline pain catastrophizing scores and used intention-to-treat analysis. Empowered relief was noninferior to CBT for pain intensity and pain interference (priority secondary outcomes), sleep disturbance, pain bothersomeness, pain behavior, depression, and anxiety. Empowered relief was inferior to CBT for physical function. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with CLBP, a single-session pain management class resulted in clinically significant improvements in pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, pain interference, and other secondary outcomes that were noninferior to 8-session CBT at 3 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03167086.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D. Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Anuradha Roy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Abby L. Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ryan T. Keane
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Dokyoung S. You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Kristen Slater
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Heather Poupore-King
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ian Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ming-Chih Kao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | | | - Kate Lorig
- Department of Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Dongxue Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Juliette Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Lu Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sean C. Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ziadni MS, Anderson SR, Gonzalez-Castro L, Darnall BD. Comparative efficacy of a single-session "Empowered Relief" videoconference-delivered group intervention for chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:358. [PMID: 34022930 PMCID: PMC8140415 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05303-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is naturally aversive and often distressing for patients. Pain coping and self-regulatory skills have been shown to effectively reduce pain-related distress and other symptoms. In this trial, the primary goal is to pilot test the comparative efficacy of a single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class to a waitlist control among patients with chronic pain. METHODS Our study is a randomized clinical trial pilot testing the superiority of our 2-h single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class against a waitlist control. We will enroll 120 adult patients with mixed etiology chronic pain and randomize 1:1 to one of the two study arms. We hypothesize superiority for the pain education class for bolstering pain and symptom management. Team researchers masked to treatment assignment will assess the outcomes up to 3 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION This study aims to test the utility of a single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class to improve self-regulation of pain and pain-related outcomes. Findings from our project have the potential to significantly reduce barriers to effective psychological treatment for pain, optimizing the delivery of increasingly vital online and remote-delivered intervention options. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04546685 . Registered on 04 September 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Steven R Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hettie G, Nwaneshiudu C, Ziadni MS, Darnall BD, Mackey SC, You DS. Lack of Premeditation Predicts Aberrant Behaviors Related to Prescription Opioids in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. Subst Use Misuse 2021; 56:1904-1909. [PMID: 34369839 PMCID: PMC8928584 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1958853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In light of the opioid epidemic, there is a need to identify factors that predict aberrant opioid behaviors including misuse and abuse. Impulsivity has been extensively studied in addiction literature, but not in the context of opioid misuse. Hence, this study aimed to identify which of the impulsivity facets (negative urgency, positive urgency, sensation seeking, lack of perseverance, and lack of premeditation) would predict current aberrant opioid-related behaviors in patients with chronic pain. METHODS Data were collected through an online survey from patients with chronic pain who visited a tertiary pain clinic. Patients were predominately female (74%), middle aged (M = 55 years), and White/Caucasian (84%). Upon consent, they completed a series of surveys including UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, the Current Opioid misuse Measure, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PROMIS-anxiety, depression, and physical function, and a 0-10 numerical pain rating scale. Ordinal regression analyses were conducted to test study hypotheses. RESULTS Contrary to expectations, only lack of premeditation predicted higher odds of aberrant opioid-related behaviors in the past 30 days, after controlling for known covariates, and explained 26% of variance. Interestingly, lack of premeditation together with pain catastrophizing as a covariate explained 56% of the variance in aberrant opioid-related behaviors. DISCUSSION The current study is the first to identify a potential role of lack of premeditation as an impulsivity facet predicting aberrant opioid-related behaviors among patients with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Hettie
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Chinwe Nwaneshiudu
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Dokyoung S You
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Darnall BD, Ziadni MS, Krishnamurthy P, Flood P, Heathcote LC, Mackey IG, Taub CJ, Wheeler A. "My Surgical Success": Effect of a Digital Behavioral Pain Medicine Intervention on Time to Opioid Cessation After Breast Cancer Surgery-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Pain Med 2020; 20:2228-2237. [PMID: 31087093 PMCID: PMC6830264 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Objective This study aims to assess the feasibility of digital perioperative behavioral pain medicine intervention in breast cancer surgery and evaluate its impact on pain catastrophizing, pain, and opioid cessation after surgery. Design and Setting A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at Stanford University (Palo Alto, CA, USA) comparing a digital behavioral pain medicine intervention (“My Surgical Success” [MSS]) with digital general health education (HE). Participants A convenience sample of 127 participants were randomized to treatment group. The analytic sample was 68 patients (N = 36 MSS, N = 32 HE). Main Outcomes The primary outcome was feasibility and acceptability of a digital behavioral pain medicine intervention (80% threshold for acceptability items). Secondary outcomes were pain catastrophizing, past seven-day average pain intensity, and time to opioid cessation after surgery for patients who initiated opioid use. Results The attrition rate for MSS intervention (44%) was notably higher than for HE controls (18%), but it was lower than typical attrition rates for e-health interventions (60–80%). Despite greater attrition for MSS, feasibility was demonstrated for the 56% of MSS engagers, and the 80% threshold for acceptability was met. We observed a floor effect for baseline pain catastrophizing, and no significant group differences were found for postsurgical pain catastrophizing or pain intensity. MSS was associated with 86% increased odds of opioid cessation within the 12-week study period relative to HE controls (hazard ratio = 1.86, 95% confidence interval = 1.12–3.10, P = 0.016). Conclusions Fifty-six percent of patients assigned to MSS engaged with the online platform and reported high satisfaction. MSS was associated with significantly accelerated opioid cessation after surgery (five-day difference) with no difference in pain report relative to controls. Perioperative digital behavioral pain medicine may be a low-cost, accessible adjunct that could promote opioid cessation after breast cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Parthasarathy Krishnamurthy
- Department of Marketing and Entrepreneurship, CT Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Pamela Flood
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Lauren C Heathcote
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ian G Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Chloe Jean Taub
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida
| | - Amanda Wheeler
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Carty JN, Ziadni MS, Holmes HJ, Tomakowsky J, Peters K, Schubiner H, Lumley MA. The Effects of a Life Stress Emotional Awareness and Expression Interview for Women with Chronic Urogenital Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Med 2020; 20:1321-1329. [PMID: 30252113 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women with chronic urogenital pain (CUP) conditions have elevated rates of lifetime trauma, relational stress, and emotional conflicts, but directly assessing and treating psychological stress is rarely done in women's health care settings. We developed and tested the effects on patients' somatic and psychological symptoms of a life stress interview that encourages disclosure about stressors and uses experiential techniques to increase awareness of links between stress, emotions, and symptoms. METHODS In this randomized trial, women with CUP recruited at a multidisciplinary women's urology center received either a single 90-minute life stress interview (N = 37) or no interview (treatment-as-usual control; N = 25). Self-report measures of pain severity (primary outcome), pain interference, pelvic floor symptoms, and psychological symptoms (anxiety and depression) were completed at baseline and six-week follow-up. RESULTS Differences between the life stress interview and control conditions at follow-up were tested with analyses of covariance, controlling for baseline level of the outcome and baseline depression. Compared with the control condition, the interview resulted in significantly lower pain severity and pelvic floor symptoms, but the interview had no effect on pain interference or psychological symptoms. CONCLUSIONS An intensive life stress emotional awareness expression interview improved physical but not psychological symptoms among women with CUP seen in a tertiary care clinic. This study suggests that targeting stress and avoided emotions and linking them to symptoms may be beneficial for this complex group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer N Carty
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Hannah J Holmes
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Kenneth Peters
- Women's Urology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Howard Schubiner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ascension Health / Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Southfield, Michigan
| | - Mark A Lumley
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ziadni MS, You DS, Johnson L, Lumley MA, Darnall BD. Emotions matter: The role of emotional approach coping in chronic pain. Eur J Pain 2020; 24:1775-1784. [PMID: 32603553 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotional approach coping (EAC) is a potentially adaptive emotion-focused coping style that involves understanding or processing one's emotions and expressing them appropriately. Although EAC has been studied in various populations, little is known about this construct among people with chronic pain, including potential mediators such as negative affect, which might link EAC to pain-related variables, and moderators of these relationships. METHODS Participants (N = 670; 76% women; 30% older adults-age 60 or over) with chronic pain completed online the Emotional Approach Coping Scale and measures of pain severity, pain interference and negative affect. Analyses correlated EAC to pain severity and interference and tested whether gender and age group (older adults versus young/middle-age adults) moderated the mediated relationships of EAC with pain-related variables through negative affect. RESULTS Findings reveal that higher EAC was associated with lower pain intensity through lower negative affect in the young/middle-age portion of the sample, but not older adults. Also, higher EAC was associated with lower pain interference through lower negative affect among women in the sample, but not men. The associations of EAC to pain intensity and interference are small in magnitude, however, and should be considered preliminary. CONCLUSION EAC is associated with lower pain intensity in young/middle-age adults and lower pain interference in women, and lower negative affect mediates these relationships. These results suggest the potential value of assessing and bolstering emotional approach coping processes in some people with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Dokyoung S You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Lucia Johnson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Mark A Lumley
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ziadni MS, Chen AL, Winslow T, Mackey SC, Darnall BD. Efficacy and mechanisms of a single-session behavioral medicine class among patients with chronic pain taking prescription opioids: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:521. [PMID: 32532346 PMCID: PMC7290153 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04415-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Independent of pain intensity, pain-specific distress is highly predictive of pain treatment needs, including the need for prescription opioids. Given the inherently distressing nature of chronic pain, there is a need to equip individuals with pain education and self-regulatory skills that are shown to improve adaptation and improve their response to medical treatments. Brief, targeted behavioral medicine interventions may efficiently address the key individual factors, improve self-regulation in the context of pain, and reduce the need for opioid therapy. This highlights the critical need for targeted, cost-effective interventions that efficiently address the key psychological factors that can amplify the need for opioids and increased risk for misuse. In this trial, the primary goal is to test the comparative efficacy of a single-session skills-based pain management class to a health education active control group among patients with chronic pain who are taking opioids. Methods/design Our study is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial testing the superiority of our 2-h, single-session skills-based pain management class against a 2-h health education class. We will enroll 136 adult patients with mixed-etiology chronic pain who are taking opioid prescription medication and randomize 1:1 to one of the two treatment arms. We hypothesize superiority for the skills-based pain class for pain control, self-regulation of pain-specific distress, and reduced opioid use measured by daily morphine equivalent. Team researchers masked to treatment assignment will assess outcomes up to 12 months post treatment. Discussion This study aims to test the utility of a single-session, 2-h skills-based pain management class to improve self-regulation of pain and reduce opioid use. Findings from our project have the potential to shift current research and clinical paradigms by testing a brief and scalable intervention that could reduce the need for opioids and prevent misuse effectively, efficiently, and economically. Further, elucidation of the mechanisms of opioid use can facilitate refinement of more targeted future treatments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03950791. Registered on 10 May 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. .,Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 2C2728, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Abby L Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Tyler Winslow
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
You DS, Ziadni MS, Gilam G, Darnall BD, Mackey SC. Evaluation of Candidate Items for Severe PTSD Screening for Patients With Chronic Pain: Pilot Data Analysis With the IRT Approach. Pain Pract 2020; 20:262-268. [PMID: 31646748 PMCID: PMC7083588 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with chronic pain. Although PTSD symptoms are associated with negative health outcomes in patients with chronic pain, PTSD is typically under-detected and under-treated in outpatient pain settings. There is a need for rapid, brief screening tools to identify those at greatest risk for severe PTSD symptoms. To achieve that goal, our aim was to use item response theory (IRT) to identify the most informative PTSD symptoms characterizing severe PTSD in patients with chronic pain. METHODS Fifty-six patients (71% female, 61% White) with mixed etiology chronic pain completed the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) as part of their appointment with a pain psychologist at a tertiary outpatient pain clinic. We used an IRT approach to evaluate each item's discriminant (a) and severity (b) parameters. RESULTS Findings revealed that "feeling upset at reminders" (a = 3.67, b = 2.44) and "avoid thinking or talking about it" (a = 3.61, b = 2.17) as being highly discriminant for severe PTSD. CONCLUSIONS We identified 2 candidate items for a brief PTSD screener as they were associated with severe PTSD symptoms. These 2 items may provide clinical utility in outpatient pain treatment settings to identify those suffering from severe PTSD, enabling physicians to refer them to trauma-specific evaluation or therapy. Future research is needed to further validate and confirm these candidate PTSD items in a larger clinic sample. LAY SUMMARY The current study used the IRT approach to identify candidate items for a brief screener for severe PTSD. We examined 17 items of the PCL-C, and identified 2 items that were highly discriminant for severe PTSD. The 2 items were "feeling upset at reminders" and "avoid thinking or talking about it." These 2 items may provide clinical utility, since they may enable physicians to screen and make a referral for further assessment or treatment for PTSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung S You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A
| | - Gadi Gilam
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
You DS, Hah JM, Collins S, Ziadni MS, Domingue BW, Cook KF, Mackey SC. Evaluation of the Preliminary Validity of Misuse of Prescription Pain Medication Items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)®. Pain Med 2019; 20:1925-1933. [PMID: 30856659 PMCID: PMC6784744 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)® includes an item bank for measuring misuse of prescription pain medication (PROMIS-Rx Misuse). The bank was developed and its validity evaluated in samples of community-dwelling adults and patients in addiction treatment programs. The goal of the current study was to investigate the validity of the item bank among patients with mixed-etiology chronic pain conditions. METHOD A consecutive sample of 288 patients who presented for initial medical evaluations at a tertiary pain clinic completed questionnaires using the open-source Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry. Participants were predominantly middle-aged (M [SD] = 51.6 [15.5] years), female (62.2%), and white/non-Hispanic (51.7%). Validity was evaluated by estimating the association between PROMIS-Rx Misuse scores and scores on other measures and testing the ability of scores to distinguish among risk factor subgroups expected to have different levels of prescription pain medicine misuse (known groups analyses). RESULTS Overall, score associations with other measures were as expected and scores effectively distinguished among patients with and without relevant risk factors. CONCLUSION The study results supported the preliminary validity of PROMIS-Rx Misuse item bank scores for the assessment of prescription opioid misuse in patients visiting an outpatient pain clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung Sophia You
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jennifer M Hah
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sophie Collins
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ben W Domingue
- Stanford University Graduate School of Education, Palo Alto, California
| | - Karon F Cook
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ziadni MS, Sturgeon JA, Bissell D, Guck A, Martin KJ, Scott W, Trost Z. Injustice Appraisal, but not Pain Catastrophizing, Mediates the Relationship Between Perceived Ethnic Discrimination and Depression and Disability in Low Back Pain. J Pain 2019; 21:582-592. [PMID: 31562992 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite growing evidence of significant racial disparities in the experience and treatment of chronic pain, the mechanisms by which these disparities manifest have remained relatively understudied. The current study examined the relationship between past experiences of racial discrimination and pain-related outcomes (self-rated disability and depressive symptomatology) and tested the potential mediating roles of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice related to pain. Analyses consisted of cross-sectional path modeling in a multiracial sample of 137 individuals with chronic low back pain (Hispanics: n = 43; blacks: n = 43; whites: n = 51). Results indicated a positive relationship between prior discriminatory experiences and severity of disability and depressive symptoms. In mediation analyses, pain-related appraisals of injustice, but not pain catastrophizing, were found to mediate these relationships. Notably, the association between discrimination history and perceived injustice was significantly stronger in black and Hispanic participants and was not statistically significant in white participants. The findings suggest that race-based discriminatory experiences may contribute to racial disparities in pain outcomes and highlight the specificity of pain-related, injustice-related appraisals as a mechanism by which these experiences may impair physical and psychosocial function. Future research is needed to investigate temporal and causal mechanisms suggested by the model through longitudinal and clinical intervention studies. PERSPECTIVE: More frequent prior experiences of racial discrimination are associated with greater depressive symptomatology and pain-related disability in individuals with chronic low back pain. These associations are explained by the degree of injustice perception related to pain, but not pain catastrophizing, and were stronger among black and Hispanic participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - John A Sturgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Daniel Bissell
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Adam Guck
- Department of Family Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Kelly J Martin
- Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
| | - Whitney Scott
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zina Trost
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Heirich MS, Sinjary LS, Ziadni MS, Sacks S, Buchanan AS, Mackey SC, Newmark JL. Use of Immersive Learning and Simulation Techniques to Teach and Research Opioid Prescribing Practices. Pain Med 2019; 20:456-463. [PMID: 30215778 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unsafe opioid prescribing practices to treat acute and chronic pain continue to contribute to the opioid overdose crisis in the United States, a growing public health emergency that harms patients and their communities. Poor opioid prescribing practices stem in part from a lack of education and skills training surrounding pain and opioid management. METHODS As part of the Clinical Pain Medicine Fellowship at Stanford University, physicians were given the opportunity to participate in a pilot program to practice opioid management in a live, simulated interaction. Twenty-seven physician trainees participated in the simulation with a live, standardized patient actor. Before beginning the simulation, participants were given a detailed patient history that included the patient's risk for opioid abuse. They were also provided with relevant risk evaluation and mitigation (REM) tools. All simulation interactions were video-recorded and coded by two independent reviewers. A detailed coding scheme was developed before video analysis, and an inter-rater reliability score showed substantial agreement between reviewers. RESULTS Contrary to expectations, many of the observed performances by trainees contained aspects of unsafe opioid prescribing, given the patient history. Many trainees did not discuss their patient's aberrant behaviors related to opioids or the patient's risk for opioid abuse. Marked disparities were also observed between the trainees' active patient interactions and their written progress notes. DISCUSSION This simulation addresses a pressing need to further educate, train, and provide point-of-care tools for providers prescribing opioids. We present our experience and preliminary findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa S Heirich
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Lanja S Sinjary
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Sandra Sacks
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alexandra S Buchanan
- Center for Immersive and Simulation-based Learning, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Jordan L Newmark
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Functional Restoration Clinic, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Addiction, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Stevens NR, Ziadni MS, Lillis TA, Gerhart J, Baker C, Hobfoll SE. Perceived lack of training moderates relationship between healthcare providers' personality and sense of efficacy in trauma-informed care. Anxiety Stress Coping 2019; 32:679-693. [PMID: 31345075 DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2019.1645835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Medical patients often have trauma histories that are not routinely assessed, which can adversely affect health outcomes. Despite growing awareness of this issue, there is limited understanding of factors that influence provider competency in trauma-informed care (TIC). The study examined healthcare providers' personality traits in relation to their sense of TIC efficacy, taking into account perceived barriers to TIC and professional quality of life. Study Design: The study used cross-sectional survey methods to examine our central hypothesis that provider personality traits and perceived barriers to TIC would be associated with TIC-efficacy, and to explore interactions among study variables. Methods: Survey data were collected from 172 healthcare providers examining TIC knowledge, TIC-efficacy, perceived barriers to TIC, personality traits, and professional quality of life. Results: TIC-efficacy was positively correlated with "intellectence/openness" and inversely correlated with "neuroticism" and perceived lack of training as a barrier. "Intellectence/openness" interacted with perceived lack of training to predict TIC-efficacy, suggesting that providers with lower "intellectence/openness" report greater TIC-efficacy when lack of training is not perceived as a barrier. Conclusions: Provider personality traits and perceived barriers to TIC appear related to providers' TIC-efficacy. Implications for overcoming barriers to TIC through training and implementation are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie R Stevens
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago , IL , USA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University , Palo Alto , CA , USA
| | - Teresa A Lillis
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago , IL , USA
| | - James Gerhart
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago , IL , USA
| | - Courtney Baker
- School of Science and Engineering, Tulane University , New Orleans , LA , USA
| | - Stevan E Hobfoll
- STAR Consultants - Stress, Anxiety-Resilience , Chicago , IL , USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lillis TA, Hamilton NA, Pressman SD, Ziadni MS, Khou CS, Boddy LE, Wagner LM. Sleep quality buffers the effects of negative social interactions on maternal mood in the 3-6 month postpartum period: a daily diary study. J Behav Med 2018; 41:733-746. [PMID: 30191435 PMCID: PMC6404752 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-018-9967-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Sleep and social relationships are two key determinants of psychosocial health that undergo considerable change across the transition to motherhood. The current study investigated the bidirectional relationship between daytime Positive and Negative Social Interactions (PSIs & NSIs) and nighttime sleep quality on maternal mood across 1 week in the 3-6 month postpartum period. Sixty healthy, non-depressed first-time mothers completed 7-consecutive days of daily social interaction and sleep diaries. Results indicated that higher than average sleep quality buffered the effect of higher than average NSIs on maternal mood (i.e., buffered mood reactivity) and appeared to promote mood recovery following a particularly "bad day" (i.e., higher than average NSIs). In addition, although PSIs were more common than NSIs overall, the most frequent and positively rated PSIs were with baby as were the most frequent and negatively rated NSIs. To our knowledge, our results are the first to characterize the impact of PSIs on postpartum maternal mood, assess maternal-infant social interactions in daily diary study of postpartum social relationships, and demonstrate the role that maternal sleep quality plays in social discord-related mood reactivity and mood recovery processes in the 3-6 month postpartum period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa A Lillis
- Department Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1645 W. Jackson Blvd., Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Nancy A Hamilton
- Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Room 426, Lawrence, KS, 6604, USA
| | - Sarah D Pressman
- University of California Irvine, 4201 Social & Behavioral Sciences Gateway, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Ste. 200, 1070 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Christina S Khou
- Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Room 426, Lawrence, KS, 6604, USA
| | - Lauren E Boddy
- Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Room 426, Lawrence, KS, 6604, USA
| | - Linzy M Wagner
- Department Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1645 W. Jackson Blvd., Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Holmes HJ, Thakur ER, Carty JN, Ziadni MS, Doherty HK, Lockhart NA, Schubiner H, Lumley MA. Ambivalence over emotional expression and perceived social constraints as moderators of relaxation training and emotional awareness and expression training for irritable bowel syndrome. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2018; 53:38-43. [PMID: 29751205 PMCID: PMC6086751 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychological treatments are generally beneficial for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but patients' responses vary. A prior randomized controlled trial found that both relaxation training (RT) and emotional awareness and expression training (EAET) were superior to a waitlist control condition for IBS symptoms, quality of life, depression, and anxiety among IBS patients (Thakur et al., 2017). METHOD We conducted secondary analyses on these data to examine potential moderators of treatment outcomes. Baseline measures of patients' ambivalence over emotional expression and perceived social constraints, which have been hypothesized to influence some treatments, were tested as possible moderators of the effects of RT and EAET, compared to the control condition. RESULTS Results indicated that these variables moderated the effects of RT but not EAET. The benefits of RT occurred for patients who reported higher ambivalence over emotional expression or perceived social constraints, whereas the benefits of EAET were not influenced by these factors. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that RT might be particularly helpful for people who tend to avoid emotional disclosure and expression, supporting the possible benefit of targeting treatments to patient characteristics and preferences, whereas EAET might be helpful for a broader range of patients with IBS.
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D Darnall
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
This education intervention study reports on voluntary, patient-centered opioid tapering in outpatients with chronic pain without behavioral treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D Darnall
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | | | - Ian G Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ming-Chih Kao
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Pamela Flood
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Darnall BD, Ziadni MS, Roy A, Kao MC, Sturgeon JA, Cook KF, Lorig K, Burns JW, Mackey SC. Comparative Efficacy and Mechanisms of a Single-Session Pain Psychology Class in Chronic Low Back Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Trials 2018; 19:165. [PMID: 29510735 PMCID: PMC5838852 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2537-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Institute of Medicine (IOM) reported that chronic pain affects about 100 million U.S. adults, with chronic low back pain (CLBP) cited as the most prevalent type. Pain catastrophizing is a psychological construct shown to predict the development and trajectory of chronic pain and patient response to pain treatments. While effective treatment for pain catastrophizing typically includes eight-session groups of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a single-session targeted treatment class yielded promising results which, if replicated and extended, could prove to efficiently and cost-effectively reduce pain catastrophizing. In this trial, we seek to determine the comparative efficacy of this novel single-session pain catastrophizing class to an eight-session course of pain CBT and a single-session back pain health education class. We will also explore the psychosocial mechanisms and outcomes of pain catastrophizing treatment. Methods In this trial we will randomize 231 individuals with CLBP to one of three treatment arms: (1) pain-CBT (eight weekly 2-h group sessions with home exercises and readings); (2) a single 2-h pain catastrophizing class; or (3) a single 2-h back pain health education class (active control). For the primary outcome of pain catastrophizing, the trial is designed as a non-inferiority test between pain-CBT and the single-session pain catastrophizing class, and as a superiority test between the single-session pain catastrophizing class and the health education class. Team researchers masked to treatment assignment will assess outcomes up to six months post treatment. Discussion If the single-session targeted pain catastrophizing class is found to be an effective treatment for patients with CLBP, this low cost and low burden treatment could dismantle many of the current barriers and burdens of effective pain care. Further, elucidation of the mechanisms of pain catastrophizing treatments will facilitate future research on the topic as well as further development and refinement of treatments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03167086. Registered on 22 May 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2537-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Anuradha Roy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Ming-Chih Kao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - John A Sturgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Karon F Cook
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Kate Lorig
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - John W Burns
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Chronic pain conditions have been shown to be exacerbated by psychological factors, and a better understanding of these factors can inform clinical practice and improve the efficacy of interventions. The current paper investigates perceived injustice, a novel psychosocial construct, within a framework influenced by the tenets of predictive processing. The proposed conceptual model derived from tenets of predictive processing yields a single hierarchical self-reconfiguring system driven by prediction, which accounts for a wide range of human experiences such as perception, behavior, learning and emotion. This conceptualization can inform the development and implementation of more targeted therapeutic interventions for chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Bissell
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - John A Sturgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ziadni MS, Sturgeon JA, Darnall BD. The relationship between negative metacognitive thoughts, pain catastrophizing and adjustment to chronic pain. Eur J Pain 2017; 22:756-762. [PMID: 29214679 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive appraisals, most notably pain catastrophizing, play an important role in chronic pain. The role of metacognition and its impact on the relationship between pain catastrophizing and health are understudied. The identification of metacognition as a moderator of psychological constructs may have clinical and empirical implications. We hypothesized that negative metacognitive beliefs would moderate the relationships between pain catastrophizing and emotional functioning and physical activity. METHOD Participants (N = 211) with mixed aetiology chronic pain were primarily Caucasian females with severe average pain intensity. Over the course of 2 weeks, participants completed online daily-diary measures of pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, mood, physical activity and metacognition. RESULTS Participants with higher average levels of daily pain intensity and negative metacognitive beliefs about worry reported higher levels of daily pain catastrophizing, as well as daily depression, and anxiety. Some aspects of metacognitive beliefs (i.e. dangerousness and uncontrollability of thoughts) were also negatively associated with average daily levels of positive affect. However, these effects were not interactive; metacognitive beliefs did not moderate the relationships of pain catastrophizing with other daily variables. CONCLUSIONS From a daily coping perspective, findings reveal that people with stronger negative metacognitive beliefs report greater emotional distress on a day-to-day basis. However, negative metacognitive beliefs did not appear to modify the effects of pain catastrophizing on psychological and physical functioning at the daily level, suggesting that metacognitive beliefs may be better conceptualized as a more parallel indicator of emotional maladjustment to chronic pain whose effects do not reliably manifest in daily measurement models. SIGNIFICANCE Findings highlight the need to better characterize the value of metacognitive beliefs as an important predictor and therapeutic target. Despite limited evidence of a dynamic relationship between metacognition and daily adjustment to chronic pain, results emphasize the potential importance of interventions that target cognitive appraisal process beyond catastrophizing, including uncontrollability and danger-laden thought patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Ziadni
- Division of Pain Medicine, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - J A Sturgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - B D Darnall
- Division of Pain Medicine, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ziadni MS, Jasinski MJ, Labouvie-Vief G, Lumley MA. Alexithymia, Defenses, and Ego Strength: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Relationships with Psychological Well-Being and Depression. J Happiness Stud 2017; 18:1799-1813. [PMID: 29375250 PMCID: PMC5784853 DOI: 10.1007/s10902-016-9800-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Affect regulation is important to mental health. A deficit in one's ability to identify and express emotions (alexithymia), cognitive styles of regulating emotional conflict (defenses), and the capacity for integrative and complex self-other understanding (ego strength or maturity) need to be studied to understand how they relate to each other as well as to mental health and well-being. A sample of 415 community-dwelling adults from a major metropolitan area in the Midwest U.S., stratified for gender, age, and ethnicity, completed three methodologically different measures of affect regulation along with measures of well-being and depression. Six years later, 49% of the sample again reported their well-being and depression. At baseline, ego strength and the defenses of principalization and reversal correlated negatively with alexithymia and the other defenses (turning against self, turning against object and projection), even after controlling for negative affect. Cross-sectionally, relationships were largely as hypothesized, with low alexithymia, use of mature defenses, and greater ego strength correlating with less depression and greater well-being, although some of these relationships were attenuated after controlling for negative affect. Prospectively, each of the affect regulation measures predicted hypothesized changes in well-being after 6 years, after controlling for baseline well-being, but affect regulation did not predict changes in depression. These findings illuminate similarities and differences among these affect regulation constructs, suggest the importance of differentiating well-being from depression, and reveal that affect regulation uniquely predicts changes in long-term well-being.
Collapse
|
37
|
Thakur ER, Holmes HJ, Lockhart NA, Carty JN, Ziadni MS, Doherty HK, Lackner JM, Schubiner H, Lumley MA. Emotional awareness and expression training improves irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29:10.1111/nmo.13143. [PMID: 28643436 PMCID: PMC5690851 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current clinical guidelines identify several psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). IBS patients, however, have elevated trauma, life stress, relationship conflicts, and emotional avoidance, which few therapies directly target. We tested the effects of emotional awareness and expression training (EAET) compared to an evidence-based comparison condition-relaxation training-and a waitlist control condition. METHODS Adults with IBS (N=106; 80% female, Mean age=36 years) were randomized to EAET, relaxation training, or waitlist control. Both EAET and relaxation training were administered in three, weekly, 50-minute, individual sessions. All patients completed the IBS Symptom Severity Scale (primary outcome), IBS Quality of Life, and Brief Symptom Inventory (anxiety, depressive, and hostility symptoms) at pretreatment and at 2 weeks posttreatment and 10 weeks follow-up (primary endpoint). KEY RESULTS Compared to waitlist controls, EAET, but not relaxation training, significantly reduced IBS symptom severity at 10-week follow-up. Both EAET and relaxation training improved quality of life at follow-up. Finally, EAET did not reduce psychological symptoms, whereas relaxation training reduced depressive symptoms at follow-up (and anxiety symptoms at posttreatment). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Brief emotional awareness and expression training that targeted trauma and emotional conflicts reduced somatic symptoms and improved quality of life in patients with IBS. This emotion-focused approach may be considered an additional treatment option for IBS, although research should compare EAET to a full cognitive-behavioral protocol and determine which patients are best suited for each approach. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01886027).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyse R. Thakur
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center; VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Houston, TX
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Hannah J. Holmes
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey M. Lackner
- Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Medicine, SUNY, Buffalo, NY
| | - Howard Schubiner
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. John/Providence Health System, Southfield, MI USA
| | - Mark A. Lumley
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ziadni MS, Carty JN, Doherty HK, Porcerelli JH, Rapport LJ, Schubiner H, Lumley MA. A life-stress, emotional awareness, and expression interview for primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol 2017; 37:282-290. [PMID: 29154608 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lifetime trauma, relationship adversities, and emotional conflicts are elevated in primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), and these risk factors likely trigger or exacerbate symptoms. Helping patients disclose stressors, increase awareness and expression of inhibited emotions, and link emotions to physical symptoms may improve health. We developed an emotional awareness and expression interview that targets stressful life experiences and conflicts and then tested its effects on primary care patients with MUS. METHOD Patients (N = 75) with MUS were recruited at a family medicine clinic and randomized to an interview condition or treatment-as-usual (TAU) control condition. In a single 90-min interview in the clinic, the interviewer elicited disclosure of the patient's stressors, linked them to the patient's symptom history, and encouraged emotional awareness and expression about unresolved relationship trauma or conflict. At baseline and 6-week follow-up, patients completed self-report measures of their physical and psychological health. RESULTS Analyses of covariance, controlling for baseline symptoms, compared patients in the interview condition with TAU at 6-week follow-up. Compared with TAU, the interview led to significantly lower pain severity, pain interference, sleep problems, and global psychological symptoms. CONCLUSIONS This study provides preliminary evidence for the value of integrating a disclosure and emotional awareness and expression interview into the primary care setting for patients with MUS. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
|
39
|
Sturgeon JA, Ziadni MS, Trost Z, Darnall BD, Mackey SC. Pain catastrophizing, perceived injustice, and pain intensity impair life satisfaction through differential patterns of physical and psychological disruption. Scand J Pain 2017; 17:390-396. [PMID: 29074199 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Revised: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Previous research has highlighted the importance of cognitive appraisal processes in determining the nature and effectiveness of coping with chronic pain. Two of the key variables implicated in appraisal of pain are catastrophizing and perceived injustice, which exacerbate the severity of pain-related distress and increase the risk of long-term disability through maladaptive behavioural responses. However, to date, the influences of these phenomena have not been examined concurrently, nor have they been related specifically to quality of life measures, such as life satisfaction. METHODS Using data from an online survey of 330 individuals with chronic pain, structural path modelling techniques were used to examine the independent effects of pain catastrophizing, perceived injustice, and average pain intensity on life satisfaction. Two potential mediators of these relationships were examined: depressive symptoms and pain-related interference. RESULTS Results indicated that depressive symptoms fully mediated the relationship between pain catastrophizing and life satisfaction, and pain interference fully mediated the relationship between pain intensity and life satisfaction. Both depressive symptoms and pain interference were found to significantly mediate the relationship between perceived injustice and life satisfaction, but perceived injustice continued to demonstrate a significant and negative relationship with life satisfaction, above and beyond the other study variables. CONCLUSIONS The current findings highlight the distinct affective and behavioural mediators of pain and maladaptive cognitive appraisal processes in chronic pain, and highlight their importance in both perceptions of pain-related interference and longer-term quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Sturgeon
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle, WA 98102, USA.
| | - Maisa S Ziadni
- Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Zina Trost
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Blvd., Room 415, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Trentacosta CJ, McLear CM, Ziadni MS, Lumley MA, Arfken CL. Potentially traumatic events and mental health problems among children of Iraqi refugees: The roles of relationships with parents and feelings about school. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2016; 86:384-392. [PMID: 27196388 DOI: 10.1037/ort0000186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
This study examined mental health problems among children of Iraqi refugees, most of whom were Christian. Exposure to potentially traumatic events was hypothesized to predict more symptoms of depression and traumatic stress. Moreover, youth reports of supportive relationships with parents and positive feelings about school were examined in relation to mental health problems. These promotive factors were expected to mitigate the hypothesized association between traumatic event exposure and mental health problems. Participants were 211 youth recruited from agencies and programs serving Iraqi refugees in a large metropolitan area in the United States. The hypotheses were partially supported. Youth who reported experiencing more potentially traumatic events endorsed more traumatic stress and depression symptoms. After accounting for exposure to potentially traumatic events and other covariates, youth who reported more positive feelings about school endorsed fewer symptoms of traumatic stress, and youth who reported more supportive relationships with parents endorsed fewer symptoms of depression. In addition, there was an interaction between potentially traumatic events and relationships with parents when predicting depression symptoms. Youth endorsed higher levels of depression symptoms when they reported less supportive relationships, regardless of the amount of traumatic event exposure, whereas youth endorsed lower levels of depression symptoms when they reported more supportive relationships with parents, but only at low levels of traumatic event exposure. Otherwise, the main effects were not qualified by interactions between potentially traumatic event exposure and the promotive factors. The findings from this study have implications for future research, policy, and practice with children of refugees. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Cynthia L Arfken
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Miller-Matero LR, Dubaybo F, Ziadni MS, Feit R, Kvamme R, Eshelman A, Keimig W. Embedding a Psychologist Into Primary Care Increases Access to Behavioral Health Services. J Prim Care Community Health 2014; 6:100-4. [DOI: 10.1177/2150131914550831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients commonly report psychological issues during primary care visits; however, few patients will follow through with a referral for behavioral health services at an outside facility. Therefore, patients may benefit from having psychologists embedded into primary care clinics. The purpose of this study was to determine who saw a primary care psychologist and to investigate which patient characteristics predicted who was more likely to attend subsequent visits with behavioral health services. Methods: There were 96 patients referred to a primary care psychologist by their primary care physician. Chart reviews were conducted to obtain patient characteristics and to determine whether the patients attended a subsequent visit with behavioral health services after the initial evaluation. Results: There were 84.4% of patients who completed an initial evaluation with a psychologist and 15.6% either cancelled or did not show for this evaluation. Of those who completed the initial evaluation, more than half had never received treatment from a behavioral health specialist. Of the 70.4% patients recommended to attend additional behavioral health treatment, 54.4% of patients attended a subsequent visit. Gender, age, race, years of education, and whether a patient had previous behavioral treatment did not predict who was more likely to attend a subsequent behavioral health visit after the initial evaluation. Conclusions: Embedding a psychologist in a primary care clinic leads to increased access to behavioral health services, especially among patients who may not seek out these services themselves or follow through with a physician’s referral to an outside behavioral health clinic.
Collapse
|
42
|
Hijazi AM, Lumley MA, Ziadni MS, Haddad L, Rapport LJ, Arnetz BB. Brief narrative exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress in Iraqi refugees: a preliminary randomized clinical trial. J Trauma Stress 2014; 27:314-22. [PMID: 24866253 PMCID: PMC4080404 DOI: 10.1002/jts.21922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Many Iraqi refugees suffer from posttraumatic stress. Efficient, culturally sensitive interventions are needed, and so we adapted narrative exposure therapy into a brief version (brief NET) and tested its effects in a sample of traumatized Iraqi refugees. Iraqi refugees in the United States reporting elevated posttraumatic stress (N = 63) were randomized to brief NET or waitlist control conditions in a 2:1 ratio; brief NET was 3 sessions, conducted individually, in Arabic. Positive indicators (posttraumatic growth and well-being) and symptoms (posttraumatic stress, depressive, and somatic) were assessed at baseline and 2- and 4-month follow-up. Treatment participation (95.1% completion) and study retention (98.4% provided follow-up data) were very high. Significant condition by time interactions showed that those receiving brief NET had greater posttraumatic growth (d = 0.83) and well-being (d = 0.54) through 4 months than controls. Brief NET reduced symptoms of posttraumatic stress (d = -0.48) and depression (d = -0.46) more, but only at 2 months; symptoms of controls also decreased from 2 to 4 months, eliminating condition differences at 4 months. Three sessions of brief NET increased growth and well-being and led to symptom reduction in highly traumatized Iraqi refugees. This preliminary study suggests that brief NET is both acceptable and potentially efficacious in traumatized Iraqi refugees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa M. Hijazi
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Mark A. Lumley
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Luay Haddad
- Department of Psychiatry, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Lisa J. Rapport
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Bengt B. Arnetz
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ziadni MS, Patterson CA, Pulgarón ER, Robinson MR, Barakat LP. Health-Related Quality of Life and Adaptive Behaviors of Adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease: Stress Processing Moderators. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2011; 18:335-44. [DOI: 10.1007/s10880-011-9254-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|