Identifying advanced MAFLD in a cohort of T2DM and clinical features

BACKGROUND

MAFLD is the most common cause of chronic liver disease, affecting 25% of the global population. Patients with T2DM have an increased risk of developing MAFLD. In addition, patients with T2DM have a higher risk of advanced forms of steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Identifying those patients is critical in order to refer them to specialist and appropriate management of their disease.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To estimate advanced fibrosis prevalence in a cohort of patients with T2DM and to identify possible predictors.

METHODS

subjects with T2DM during regular health check-up were enrolled. Demographic and general characteristics were measured, including metabolic parameters and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR). Four non-invasive fibrosis scores (NAFLD fibrosis scores, FIB-4, APRI, Hepamet fibrosis score) were measure and compared with transient elastography (TE).

RESULTS

96 patients (21%) presented risk of significant fibrosis (≥F2) measured by TE and 45 patients (10%) presented with risk of advanced fibrosis F3-F4. Liver fibrosis was related to BMI, AC, HOMA2-IR. The results of the non-invasive fibrosis scores have been validated with the results obtained in the TE. It is observed that the index with the greatest area under the curve (AUC) is APRI (AUC=0.729), with a sensitivity of 62.2% and a specificity of 76.1%. However, the test with better positive likelihood ratio (LR+) in our study is NAFLD fibrosis score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that in a general T2DM follow up, 10% of patients were at risk of advanced fibrosis. We found a positive correlation between liver fibrosis and BMI, AC and HOMA2-IR. Non-invasive fibrosis markers can be useful for screening, showing NAFLD Fibrosis score a better LHR+ compared to TE. Further studies are needed to validate these results and elucidate the best screening approach to identify those patients at risk of advanced MAFLD.

Effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals in hepatitis C infected patients with mental disorders: Results in real clinical practice

The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in psychiatric patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Secondary objectives included adherence and drug-drug interaction (DDIs) evaluations. Prospective observational comparative study carried out during 3 years. Psychiatric patients were included and mental illness classified by a psychiatric team based on clinical records. Main effectiveness and safety variables were sustained virologic response (SVR) at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) and rate of on-treatment serious drug-related adverse events (AEs), respectively. A total of 242 psychiatric and 900 nonpsychiatric patients were included. SVR12 by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of psychiatric vs nonpsychiatric patients was 92.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.1-96.1) vs 96.2% (95% CI, 94.9-97.5) (P = .02). SVR12 by modified-ITT analysis was 97.8% (95% CI, 95.0-99.3) vs 98.4% (95% CI, 97.5-99.3) (P = .74). 92.2% of psychiatric patients with mental disorders secondary to multiple drug use (MDSDU) and 93.0% of psychiatric patients without MDSDU vs 96.2% of nonpsychiatric patients reached SVR12 (P = .05 and P = .20, respectively). The percentage of adherent patients to DAAs did not show differences between cohorts (P = .08). 30.2% of psychiatric patients and 27.6% of nonpsychiatric patients presented clinically relevant DDIs (P = .47). 1.7% vs 0.8% of psychiatric vs nonpsychiatric patients developed serious AEs (P = .39); no serious psychiatric AEs were present. DAAs have shown a slightly lower effectiveness in psychiatric patients with CHC, as a result of loss of follow up, which justifies the need for integrated and multidisciplinary health care teams. DAAs safety, adherence, and DDIs, however, are similar to that of nonpsychiatric patients.

Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin vs glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infected patients

Objectives

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir±ribavirin (SOF/VEL±RBV) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) are the drug combinations of choice for treating individuals with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (G3-HCV) infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL±RBV compared with GLE/PIB for treating G3-HCV infection under routine clinical practice conditions.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of individuals with G3-HCV infection who initiated treatment with SOF/VEL +/-RBV or GLE/PIB between April 2017 and July 2018. Prisoners and children were excluded. The outcome variable of effectiveness was sustained virological response 12 weeks after completing treatment (SVR12). The safety variable was withdrawal secondary to severe adverse events (SAEs). Covariates included sex, age, HIV co-infection, previous liver transplant, cirrhosis, hepatic fibrosis and previous antiviral treatment. Statistical significance was calculated using Fisher's exact test or the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 46 were treated with SOF/VEL±RBV and 30 were treated with GLE/PIB. No baseline differences were observed between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, HIV co-infection, fibrosis stage, cirrhosis and previous antiviral treatment. Of the patients treated with SOF/VEL±RBV and GLE/PIB, 95.7% and 96.7% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.7). Of patients with and without cirrhosis, 83.3% and 98.4% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.09). Of the patients with low-grade hepatic fibrosis (F0-2) and advanced fibrosis (F3-4), 100% and 85.7% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.03). In treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients, 95.7% and 100% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.57), without significant differences independent of the treatment group (P=0.28 for SOF/VEL±RBV; P=0.18 for GLE/PIB). The incidence of AEs was 21.1% (95% CI 11.3% to 30.9%). None of the patients developed an SAE or required antiviral treatment withdrawal.

Conclusions

SOF/VEL±RBV or GLE/PIB are safe and effective for treating G3-HCV-infections, with a lower effectiveness in patients with advanced fibrosis F3-4.

Deep-sequencing reveals broad subtype-specific HCV resistance mutations associated with treatment failure

A percentage of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients fail direct acting antiviral (DAA)-based treatment regimens, often because of drug resistance-associated substitutions (RAS). The aim of this study was to characterize the resistance profile of a large cohort of patients failing DAA-based treatments, and investigate the relationship between HCV subtype and failure, as an aid to optimizing management of these patients. A new, standardized HCV-RAS testing protocol based on deep sequencing was designed and applied to 220 previously subtyped samples from patients failing DAA treatment, collected in 39 Spanish hospitals. The majority had received DAA-based interferon (IFN) α-free regimens; 79% had failed sofosbuvir-containing therapy. Genomic regions encoding the nonstructural protein (NS) 3, NS5A, and NS5B (DAA target regions) were analyzed using subtype-specific primers. Viral subtype distribution was as follows: genotype (G) 1, 62.7%; G3a, 21.4%; G4d, 12.3%; G2, 1.8%; and mixed infections 1.8%. Overall, 88.6% of patients carried at least 1 RAS, and 19% carried RAS at frequencies below 20% in the mutant spectrum. There were no differences in RAS selection between treatments with and without ribavirin. Regardless of the treatment received, each HCV subtype showed specific types of RAS. Of note, no RAS were detected in the target proteins of 18.6% of patients failing treatment, and 30.4% of patients had RAS in proteins that were not targets of the inhibitors they received. HCV patients failing DAA therapy showed a high diversity of RAS. Ribavirin use did not influence the type or number of RAS at failure. The subtype-specific pattern of RAS emergence underscores the importance of accurate HCV subtyping. The frequency of "extra-target" RAS suggests the need for RAS screening in all three DAA target regions.

Effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin in genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infected patients. Results in real clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

Direct-acting antivirals have shown high efficacy in all hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes, but genotype 3 (G3) treatments continue to be a challenge, mainly in cirrhotic patients. The aim of this study is to analyse effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir associated with sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin in G3-HCV infected patients in real clinical practice.

METHODS

An observational, prospective, cohort study over 2.5 years, in G3-HCV infected adult patients, in all fibrosis stages including patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Treatment was a combination of sofosbuvir 400 mg/day + daclatasvir 60 mg/day, with or without a weight-adjusted dosing of ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response rates 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12). The primary safety endpoint was treatment withdrawal rates secondary to severe adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients were enrolled, 32.4% cirrhotics and 29.9% treatment-experienced. The global SVR12 rate was 94.6%, while the SVR12 rate in F3-4 fibrosis stage patients was 90.8% versus 100% in patients with F0-2 fibrosis (p=0.03). In cirrhotic patients, SVR12 was 100% versus 40% depending on whether ribavirin was added or not to daclatasvir/sofosbuvir (p=0.001). No other patient or treatment basal variables influenced the treatment effectiveness. No patient treatment withdrawal secondary to severe adverse events was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Daclatasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin is highly effective in G3-HCV infected patients. Advanced degrees of fibrosis significantly decrease the effectiveness of this treatment, which motivates the need for the addition of ribavirin in cirrhotic patients. The regimen was safe and well tolerated.