Efficacy of Tamoxifen Metabolites in Combination with Colistin and Tigecycline in Experimental Murine Models of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen metabolites as therapeutic agents against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii, using a repurposing approach to shorten the time required to obtain a new effective treatment against multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. Characterisation and virulence studies were conducted on E. coli (colistin-susceptible C1-7-LE and colistin-resistant MCR-1+) and A. baumannii (tigecycline-susceptible Ab#9 and tigecycline-resistant Ab#186) strains. The efficacy of the metabolite mix (33.3% each) and N-desmethyltamoxifen in combination with colistimethate sodium (CMS) or tigecycline was evaluated in experimental models in mice. In the pneumonia model, N-desmethyltamoxifen exhibited significant efficacy against Ab#9 and both E. coli strains, especially E. coli MCR-1+ (-2.86 log10 CFU/g lungs, -5.88 log10 CFU/mL blood, and -50% mortality), and against the Ab#186 strain when combined with CMS (-2.27 log10 CFU/g lungs, -2.73 log10 CFU/mL blood, and -40% mortality) or tigecycline (-3.27 log10 CFU/g lungs, -4.95 log10 CFU/mL blood, and -50% mortality). Moreover, the metabolite mix in combination with both antibiotics decreased the bacterial concentrations in the lungs and blood for both A. baumannii strains. In the sepsis model, the significant efficacy of the metabolite mix was restricted to the colistin-susceptible E. coli C1-7-LE strain (-3.32 log10 CFU/g lung, -6.06 log10 CFU/mL blood, and -79% mortality). N-desmethyltamoxifen could be a new therapeutic option in combination with CMS or tigecycline for combating multidrug-resistant GNB, specifically A. baumannii.

Efficacy of dual carbapenem treatment in a murine sepsis model of infection due to carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii

Objectives

To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of a dual carbapenem combination containing imipenem plus meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing carbapenemases OXA-23 or OXA-58.

Methods

An experimental model of peritonitis using C57BL/6J female mice was developed and the minimum lethal doses were calculated for infections due to OXA-23 or OXA-58 producers of A. baumannii clinical isolates. The efficacies of the carbapenems in monotherapy and in combination were tested.

Results

Meropenem was better than imipenem in mice infected with either of the carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) strains. The combination of meropenem plus imipenem significantly improved the clearance of CRAbs from spleen compared with non-treated groups. The carbapenem-containing combination was better than imipenem for treating mice infected with both carbapenemase producers. In blood, the carbapenem combination significantly decreased the bacterial load of the OXA-23 producers compared with imipenem or meropenem used in monotherapy.

Conclusions

These results suggest that dual carbapenem combination could be an option for the treatment of infections due to carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii such as OXA-23 and OXA-58 producers.

Efficacy of Fosfomycin and Its Combination With Aminoglycosides in an Experimental Sepsis Model by Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Strains

Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections are an increasing global threat with scarce and uncertain treatment options. In this context, combination therapies are often used for these infections. The bactericidal and synergistic activity of fosfomycin plus amikacin and gentamicin was studied trough time–kill assays against four clonally unrelated clinical isolates of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae, VIM-1, VIM-1 plus DHA-1, OXA-48 plus CTXM-15, and KPC-3, respectively. The efficacy of antimicrobials that showed synergistic activity in vitro against all the carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae were tested in monotherapy and in combination, in a murine peritoneal sepsis model. In vitro, fosfomycin plus amikacin showed synergistic and bactericidal effect against strains producing VIM-1, VIM-1 plus DHA-1, and OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15. Fosfomycin plus gentamicin had in vitro synergistic activity against the strain producing KPC-3. In vivo, fosfomycin and amikacin and its combination reduced the spleen bacterial concentration compared with controls groups in animals infected by K. pneumoniae producing VIM-1 and OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15. Moreover, amikacin alone and its combination with fosfomycin reduced the bacteremia rate against the VIM-1 producer strain. Contrary to the in vitro results, no in vivo efficacy was found with fosfomycin plus amikacin against the VIM-1 plus DHA-1 producer strain. Finally, fosfomycin plus gentamicin reduced the bacterial concentration in spleen against the KPC-3 producer strain. In conclusion, our results suggest that fosfomycin plus aminoglycosides has a dissimilar efficacy in the treatment of this severe experimental infection, when caused by different carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae strains. Fosfomycin plus amikacin or plus gentamycin may be useful to treat infections by OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15 or KPC-3 producer strains, respectively.

Efficacy of Colistin and Its Combination With Rifampin in Vitro and in Experimental Models of Infection Caused by Carbapenemase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Despite the relevance of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-Kp) infections there are a scarce number of studies to evaluate in vivo the efficacy of combinations therapies. The bactericidal activity of colistin, rifampin, and its combination was studied (time–kill curves) against four clonally unrelated clinical isolates of CP-Kp, producing VIM-1, VIM-1 plus DHA-1(acquired AmpC β-lactamase), OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15 (extended spectrum β-lactamase) and KPC-3, respectively, with colistin MICs of 0.5, 64, 0.5, and 32 mg/L, respectively. The efficacies of antimicrobials in monotherapy and in combination were tested in a murine peritoneal sepsis model, against all the CP-Kp. Their efficacies were tested in the pneumonia model against the OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15 producers. The development of colistin-resistance was analyzed for the colistin-susceptible strains in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, colistin plus rifampin was synergistic against all the strains at 24 h. In vivo, compared to the controls, rifampin alone reduced tissue bacterial concentrations against VIM-1 and OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15 strains; CMS plus rifampin reduced tissue bacterial concentrations of these two CP-Kp and of the KPC-3 strain. Rifampin and the combination increased the survival against the KPC-3 strain; in the pneumonia model, the combination also improved the survival. No resistant mutants appeared with the combination. In conclusion, CMS plus rifampin had a low and heterogeneous efficacy in the treatment of severe peritoneal sepsis model due to CP-Kp producing different carbapenemases, increasing survival only against the KPC-3 strain. The combination showed efficacy in the less severe pneumonia model. The combination prevented in vitro and in vivo the development of colistin resistant mutants.

Efficacy of cecropin A-melittin peptides on a sepsis model of infection by pan-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Pan-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii have prompted the search for therapeutic alternatives. We evaluate the efficacy of four cecropin A-melittin hybrid peptides (CA-M) in vivo. Toxicity was determined in mouse erythrocytes and in mice (lethal dose parameters were LD(0), LD(50), LD(100)). Protective dose 50 (PD(50)) was determined by inoculating groups of ten mice with the minimal lethal dose of A. baumannii (BMLD) and treating with doses of each CA-M from 0.5 mg/kg to LD(0). The activity of CA-Ms against A. baumannii was assessed in a peritoneal sepsis model. Mice were sacrificed at 0 and 1, 3, 5, and 7-h post-treatment. Spleen and peritoneal fluid bacterial concentrations were measured. CA(1-8)M(1-18) was the less haemolytic on mouse erythrocytes. LD(0) (mg/kg) was 32 for CA(1-8)M(1-18), CA(1-7)M(2-9), and Oct-CA(1-7)M(2-9), and 16 for CA(1-7)M(5-9). PD(50) was not achieved with non-toxic doses (≤ LD(0)). In the sepsis model, all CA-Ms were bacteriostatic in spleen, and decreased bacterial concentration (p < 0.05) in peritoneal fluid, at 1-h post-treatment; at later times, bacterial regrowth was observed in peritoneal fluid. CA-Ms showed local short-term efficacy in the peritoneal sepsis model caused by pan-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Efficacy of rifampin, in monotherapy and in combinations, in an experimental murine pneumonia model caused by panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains

The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of rifampin, and its combinations with imipenem or sulbactam, in an experimental pneumonia model caused by two panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains (HUVR99 and HUVR113). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) (μg/ml) of the strains were rifampin 128/>128 for both strains, imipenem 128/>256 and 256/>256 for HUVR99 and HUVR113, respectively, and sulbactam >256/>256 for both strains. In time-kill studies, at MICs, rifampin was bactericidal for both strains and sulbactam against the HUVR99 strain. Rifampin plus imipenem or sulbactam, at the MIC or mice C (max), were synergistic. In vivo, against HUVR99 and HUVR113, rifampin (73% and 40%) and its combinations improved the survival with respect to the control group (20% and 0%, p < 0.05), respectively. Rifampin (87% and 46%) and its combinations improved the sterilization of blood cultures with respect to the control groups (0%, p < 0.05). In regard to the bacterial clearance from lungs, rifampin (2.57 ± 2.47 and 5.35 ± 3.03 log(10) cfu/g) and its combinations with imipenem or sulbactam diminished the bacterial lung concentration with respect to the control group (10.89 ± 3.00 and 11.86 ± 0.49, p < 0.05) with both strains. In conclusion, rifampin alone or associated to imipenem or sulbactam were effective for the treatment of murine pneumonia caused by selected panresistant A. baumannii strains.

Efficacy of fosfomycin and its combination with linezolid, vancomycin and imipenem in an experimental peritonitis model caused by a Staphylococcus aureus strain with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of therapies including fosfomycin against clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (hGISA). Time-kill curves were performed over 24 h. Peritonitis in C57BL/6 mice was induced by intraperitoneal inoculation of 10(8) CFU/ml. Four hours later (0 h), therapy was started and the treatment groups were: control (not treated), fosfomycin (100 mg/kg/5 h), vancomycin (60 mg/kg/5 h), imipenem (30 mg/kg/5 h), fosfomycin plus linezolid, fosfomycin plus vancomycin and fosfomycin plus imipenem, receiving subcutaneous therapy over 25 h. Bacterial counts in peritoneal fluid, bacteraemia and mortality rates were determined. In vitro, fosfomycin showed a synergistic effect when combined with the other antimicrobials tested. In the animal model, fosfomycin combinations were effective and significantly reduced the bacteraemia rates achieved in the control, imipenem and vancomycin groups (p < 0.05). The best combination in vivo was fosfomycin plus imipenem. Also, fosfomycin plus linezolid was significantly better than vancomycin alone, reducing the bacterial concentration in the peritoneal fluid. In conclusion, in vitro and in vivo, fosfomycin in combination with linezolid, vancomycin or imipenem exerted a good activity. Fosfomycin plus imipenem was the most active combination, decreasing 3 log CFU/ml, and appears to be a promising combination for clinical practice.

Prevention of rifampicin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii in an experimental pneumonia murine model, using rifampicin associated with imipenem or sulbactam

OBJECTIVES

To examine the development of rifampicin resistance in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii exposed to rifampicin and the prevention of the appearance of rifampicin-resistant mutants when rifampicin is used in association with imipenem or sulbactam.

METHODS

A clinical strain of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii was used to examine the frequency of resistance to rifampicin in vivo, in a pneumonia model in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. The in vitro and in vivo prevention of the development of resistance to rifampicin was analysed using rifampicin alone or in association with imipenem or sulbactam, in time-kill studies and in the experimental murine pneumonia, respectively.

RESULTS

Rifampicin-resistant mutants were found at 48 and 72 h, both in vitro and in vivo, when rifampicin was used alone, with the MIC increasing from 4 to > or =128 mg/L. The in vivo frequency of rifampicin-resistant mutants was 3 x 10(-6). On the contrary, no resistant mutants appeared after 72 h, in vitro or in vivo, when rifampicin was employed in association with imipenem or sulbactam. After six daily passages in rifampicin-free agar plates the resistant mutants maintained the high resistance to rifampicin (> or =128 mg/L).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that rifampicin must not be used alone in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. In these cases, rifampicin may be used in combination with imipenem or sulbactam, which prevent the development of resistance to rifampicin.

Activity of cefepime and carbapenems in experimental pneumonia caused by porin-deficient Klebsiella pneumoniae producing FOX-5 beta-lactamase

The in-vivo activities of cefepime, imipenem and meropenem against the porin-deficient strain Klebsiella pneumoniae C2 and its derivative K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252) coding for the AmpC-type beta-lactamase FOX-5 were determined. Bactericidal activities were determined with the kill-curve method. A pneumonia model in guinea-pigs was developed, and Cmax, t(1/2) and DeltaT/MIC were calculated for the three agents tested. Animals were treated for 72 h with sterile saline (control group) or with cefepime, imipenem or meropenem (240 mg/kg/day, intramuscularly, three times daily). Bacterial counts in lungs (log10 CFU/g tissue) were determined by serial dilution. MICs (mg/L) of cefepime, imipenem and meropenem against K. pneumoniae C2/K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252), determined by macrodilution, were: 0.5/4, 0.5/0.5 and 0.25/0.5, respectively. Bacterial counts in the lungs of animals infected with K. pneumoniae C2 and treated with antimicrobial agents were always lower than in the control group (cefepime, 4.4 +/- 0.5; imipenem, 4.6 +/- 0.4; meropenem, 4.7 +/- 0.5; control group, 5.6 +/- 0.8; p <0.01). No significant differences were observed among the groups receiving therapy (p >0.05). Bacterial lung clearance was higher in treated animals than in control animals following infection with K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252) (cefepime, 4.5 +/- 0.4; imipenem, 4.0 +/- 0.3; meropenem, 4.6 +/- 0.4; control group, 6.1 +/- 0.6; p <0.01), with imipenem producing better clearance than either cefepime or meropenem (p <0.05). Thus, in the guinea-pig pneumonia model, cefepime, imipenem and meropenem were each effective against the porin-deficient K. pneumoniae strain C2 and its derivative expressing the plasmid-mediated AmpC type beta-lactamase FOX-5.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment of the in-vivo efficacy of imipenem alone or in combination with amikacin for the treatment of experimental multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia

A guinea-pig pneumonia model involving imipenem-susceptible and imipenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii was developed to assess the in-vitro and in-vivo activities of imipenem, alone or in combination with amikacin, and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Serum levels were measured by bioassay (imipenem) or immunoassay (amikacin), followed by calculation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters (Cmax, AUC, t1/2, Cmax/MIC, AUC/MIC, and Deltat/MIC). In-vivo efficacy was evaluated by comparing bacterial counts in the lungs of treatment groups with end-of-therapy controls by anova and post-hoc tests. Decreases in the Cmax (13.4%), AUC (13%), t1/2 (25%) and Deltat/MIC (11.8-32.2%) of imipenem were observed when it was administered with amikacin, compared with administration of imipenem alone. Similarly, decreases in the Cmax (34.5%), AUC (11.6%), Cmax/MIC (34.5%) and AUC/MIC (11.7%) of amikacin were observed when it was administered with imipenem. Bacterial counts in lungs were reduced by imipenem (p 0.004) with the imipenem-susceptible strain, and by amikacin (p 0.001) with the imipenem-resistant strain. The combination of imipenem plus amikacin was inferior to imipenem alone with the imipenem-susceptible strain (p 0.01), despite their in-vitro synergy, and was inferior to amikacin alone with the imipenem-resistant strain (p < 0.0001). In summary, combined use of imipenem with amikacin was less efficacious than monotherapy, probably because of a drug-drug interaction that resulted in decreased pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for both antimicrobial agents.

Morphological changes induced by imipenem and meropenem at sub-inhibitory concentrations in Acinetobacter baumannii

Abstract Sub-inhibitory concentrations of imipenem and meropenem were evaluated for their ability to induce morphological changes with six strains of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Three strains were susceptible and three were resistant to carbapenems. The strains were grown in the presence of 0 (controls), 0.25x, 0.5x and 1x the MIC of both carbapenems for 4 h, and then examined after Gram's stain. Cells > or = 3 microm in size (spheroplasts) were considered to be altered. Both carbapenems induced significant numbers of spheroplasts compared to controls. Imipenem had more effect against susceptible strains, while meropenem had a greater effect against resistant strains.