Overnight Stay in the Emergency Department and Mortality in Older Patients

Importance

Patients in the emergency department (ED) who are waiting for hospital admission on a wheeled cot may be subject to harm. However, mortality and morbidity among older patients who spend the night in the ED while waiting for a bed in a medical ward are unknown.

Objective

To assess whether older adults who spend a night in the ED waiting for admission to a hospital ward are at increased risk of in-hospital mortality.

Design, Settings, and Participants

This was a prospective cohort study of older patients (≥75 years) who visited the ED and were admitted to the hospital on December 12 to 14, 2022, at 97 EDs across France. Two groups were defined and compared: those who stayed in the ED from midnight until 8:00 am (ED group) and those who were admitted to a ward before midnight (ward group).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was in-hospital mortality, truncated at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital adverse events (ie, falls, infection, bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, thrombosis, bedsores, and dysnatremia) and hospital length of stay. A generalized linear-regression mixed model was used to compare end points between groups.

Results

The total sample comprised 1598 patients (median [IQR] age, 86 [80-90] years; 880 [55%] female and 718 [45%] male), with 707 (44%) in the ED group and 891 (56%) in the ward group. Patients who spent the night in the ED had a higher in-hospital mortality rate of 15.7% vs 11.1% (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.07-1.81). They also had a higher risk of adverse events compared with the ward group (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49) and increased median length of stay (9 vs 8 days; rate ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.11-1.31). In a prespecified subgroup analysis of patients who required assistance with the activities of daily living, spending the night in the ED was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate (aRR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.25-2.61).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this prospective cohort study indicate that for older patients, waiting overnight in the ED for admission to a ward was associated with increased in-hospital mortality and morbidity, particularly in patients with limited autonomy. Older adults should be prioritized for admission to a ward.

The Impact of Age on In-Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective and Multicenter Study

Introduction: For the past two years, healthcare systems worldwide have been battling the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Several studies tried to find predictive factors of mortality in COVID-19 patients. We aimed to research age as a predictive factor associated with in-hospital mortality in severe and critical SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Between 1 March and 20 April 2020, we conducted a multicenter and retrospective study on a cohort of severe COVID-19 patients who were all hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We led our study in nine hospitals of northeast France, one of the pandemic’s epicenters in Europe. Results: The median age of our study population was 66 years (58−72 years). Mortality was 24.6% (CI 95%: 20.6−29%) in the ICU and 26.5% (CI 95%: 22.3−31%) in the hospital. Non-survivors were significantly older (69 versus 64 years, p < 0.001) than the survivors. Although a history of cardio-vascular diseases was more frequent in the non-survivor group (p = 0.015), other underlying conditions and prior level of autonomy did not differ between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, age appeared to be an interesting predictive factor of in-hospital mortality. Thus, age ranges of 65 to 74 years (OR = 2.962, CI 95%: 1.231−7.132, p = 0.015) were predictive of mortality, whereas the group of patients aged over 75 years was not (OR = 3.084, CI 95%: 0.952−9.992, p = 0.06). Similarly, all comorbidities except for immunodeficiency (OR = 4.207, CI 95%: 1.006−17.586, p = 0.049) were not predictive of mortality. Finally, survival follow-up was obtained for the study population. Conclusion: Age appears to be a relevant predictive factor of in-hospital mortality in cases of severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Pre-Hospital Management of Critically Ill Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 outbreak had a major impact on healthcare systems worldwide. Our study aims to describe the characteristics and therapeutic emergency mobile service (EMS) management of patients with vital distress due to COVID-19, their in-hospital care pathway and their in-hospital outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective and multicentric study was conducted in the six main centers of the French Greater East region, an area heavily impacted by the pandemic. All patients requiring EMS dispatch and who were admitted straight to the intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Clinical data from their pre-hospital and hospital management were retrieved.

RESULTS

We included a total of 103 patients (78.6% male, median age 68). In the initial stage, patients were in a critical condition (median oxygen saturation was 72% (60-80%)). In the field, 77.7% (CI 95%: 71.8-88.3%) were intubated. Almost half of our population (45.6%, CI 95%: 37.1-56.9%) had clinical Phenotype 1 (silent hypoxemia), while the remaining half presented Phenotype 2 (acute respiratory failure). In the ICU, a great number had ARDS (77.7%, CI 95% 71.8-88.3% with a PaO2/FiO2 < 200). In-hospital mortality was 33% (CI 95%: 24.6-43.3%). The two phenotypes showed clinical and radiological differences (respiratory rate, OR = 0.98, p = 0.02; CT scan lesion extension >50%, OR = 0.76, p < 0.03). However, no difference was found in terms of overall in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.07, p = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

The clinical phenotypes appear to be very distinguishable in the pre-hospital field, yet no difference was found in terms of mortality. This leads us to recommend an identical management in the initial phase, despite the two distinct presentations.

Retour d’expérience de deux structures d’urgences de centres hospitaliers généraux pendant la crise de la Covid-19

La Covid-19 s’est abattue sur l’Alsace en quelques jours, mettant à mal les hôpitaux de Mulhouse et de Colmar. Bien que proches, des différences notables existent au sein de ces deux structures en termes architecturaux et de ressources humaines. Comment cette vague a-t-elle modifié les organisations de chacun ? Quelles alternatives ont pu être mises en place ? Après la présentation de chaque site sont analysées les adaptations nécessaires afin d’absorber les flux de patients et leur proposer une prise en charge décente malgré des conditions parfois très dégradées. Nouvelles filières, modifications organisationnelles, renforts de personnel en interne puis en externe, augmentation capacitaire nette, recherches de solutions alternatives aux voies classiques d’approvisionnement des matériels… ont été une partie de la solution. Malgré les alertes du terrain, l’action nationale est restée en décalage de compréhension de la gravité de la situation locale, avec des recommandations et des actions soit inapplicables, soit trop tardives. Les établissements et professionnels de santé ont eu un sentiment d’isolement, renforcé par l’absence de représentant des tutelles et notamment de l’Agence régionale de santé sur le terrain. Deux éléments majeurs peuvent être mis en avant : une cohésion majeure de l’ensemble du centre hospitalier avec travail d’équipe et de terrain entre soignants et direction, et une implication de l’ensemble des acteurs de la médecine d’urgence (public, privé, libéraux, service départemental d’incendie et de secours) ; ils ont été les déterminants dans notre capacité à faire face à cet événement inédit.

Covid-19 : les transferts internationaux de patients de réanimation, une solution pour les départements frontaliers

La crise sanitaire de la Covid-19 a imposé une adaptabilité jamais réalisée de notre système de santé. Les services de réanimation et les structures de médecine d’urgence ont dû innover et développer des stratégies novatrices pour garantir des soins de qualité à tous les patients relevant de réanimation. La région Grand-Est, et plus particulièrement les départements de Moselle, du Bas-Rhin et du Haut-Rhin, a été particulièrement touchée. Parmi les 349 patients transférés hors de la région, 164 l’ont été vers des pays européens (Allemagne, Autriche, Luxembourg et Suisse) entre le 14 mars et le 4 avril 2020. Ces transferts internationaux, organisés par l’Agence régionale de santé et les Samu-Centre 15, ont essentiellement fait appel à des moyens aériens des hôpitaux, de l’armée et de la protection civile. L’accompagnement des patients, soigneusement sélectionnés, était assuré par un binôme médecin‒ infirmier spécialisés. Le choix de cette stratégie a permis d’éviter la saturation des services de réanimation et d’avoir à faire un choix entre les patients pouvant ou non bénéficier de soins aigus. L’adaptabilité des professionnels de santé et une organisation au plus près du terrain ont permis de réaliser ces transferts dans de bonnes conditions. Cet épisode témoigne de l’importance de laisser la gestion des crises sanitaires aux professionnels de la santé. Cet article présente l’organisation mise en place en région Grand-Est pour préparer et réaliser ces transferts internationaux.

Broad spectrum repairing properties of an extract of Aquaphilus dolomiae on in vitro and ex vivo models of injured skin

BACKGROUND

A biological concentrate was produced from cultures of an Avène aquatic microflora isolate, namely Aquaphilus dolomiae. Some of the beneficial effects on diseased and damaged skin are thought to be due to the presence of this microorganism.

AIMS

An extract of A. dolomiae (A. dolomiae extract-G2, ADE-G2) was evaluated for its wound-healing effects using in vitro and ex vivo models of injured skin.

METHODS

The effect of ADE-G2 on the proliferation of fibroblasts, migration of keratinocytes and re-epithelialization of ex vivo wounded skin explants was measured. Antimicrobial protection by ADE-G2 was measured by analysing the gene expression of a panel of antimicrobial proteins (AMPs) in keratinocytes (RNASE7, S100A7, DEFB4A/B and DEFb103B), as well as the protein encoded by DEFB4A-B (hBD2) in the medium.

RESULTS

ADE-G2 increased fibroblast proliferation and keratinocyte migration, as well as re-epithelialization of wounded ex vivo skin. ADE-G2 induced the expression of all AMP genes analysed in keratinocytes, as well as stimulated the release in to the medium of hBD2 peptide, encoded by DEFB4A/B.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown the broad spectrum of the repairing properties of the A. dolomiae extract, ADE-G2. These results support the use of ADE-G2 as a promising component for use in formulations aimed at repairing skin, limiting wound superinfection and preventing complicated wounds.

[Controlling risks in healthcare institutions]

The management of a healthcare institution generates risks through the very hazards of the management process. The management of these risks is integrated into the global safety management process and into the strategic thinking of geriatric hospitals.