Survival of patients managed in France for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (D-NET): a 20-year multicenter cohort study from the GTE group: a cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (D-NETs) have a low incidence; however, their diagnosis has been increasing. Features such as tumour location, size, type, histological grade, and stage were used to adapt the treatment to either endoscopic (ER) or surgical (SR) resections. There is no consensus regarding the definitive treatment. The authors' study aimed to describe the management of non-metastatic, well-differentiated D-NETs in France and its impact on patient survival.

METHODS

A registry-based multicenter study using prospectively collected data between 2000 and 2019, including all patients managed for non-metastatic G1 and G2 D-NETs, was conducted in the GTE group.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were included. Fifty-eight benefited from an ER, and 95 had an SR. No difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) was observed regardless of treatment type. There was no significant difference between the two groups (ER vs. SR) in terms of location, size, grade, or lymphadenopathy, regardless of the type of incomplete resection performed or regarding the pre-therapeutic assessment of lymph node invasion in imaging. The surgery allowed for significantly more complete resection (patients with R1 resection in the SR group: 9 vs. 14 in the ER group, P<0.001). Among the 51 patients with positive lymph node dissection after SR, tumour size was less than or equal to 1 cm in 25 cases. Surgical complications were more numerous (P=0.001). In the sub-group analysis of G1-G2 D-NETs between 11 and 19 mm, there was no significant difference in grade (P=0.977) and location (P=0.617) between the two groups (ER vs. SR). No significant difference was found in both morphological and functional imaging, focusing on the pre-therapeutic assessment of lymph node invasion (P=0.387).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of the resection type (ER or SR) of G1-G2 non-metastatic D-NETs, as well as the type of management of incomplete resection, which was greater in the ER group, long-term survival results were similar between ER and SR. Organ preservation seems to be the best choice owing to the slow evolution of these tumours.

Improved nationwide survival of sarcoma patients with a network of reference centers

BACKGROUND

We investigated the impact of the implementation of a network of reference centers for sarcomas (NETSARC) on the care and survival of sarcoma patients in France since 2010.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) since 2010. Its aims are to improve the quality of diagnosis and care of sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are collected in a nationwide database. The objective of this analysis was to compare the survival of patients in three periods: 2010-2012 (non-exhaustive), 2013-2015, and 2016-2020.

RESULTS

A total of 43 975 patients with sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), or connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010 (n = 9266 before 2013, n = 12 274 between 2013 and 2015, n = 22 435 in 2016-2020). Median age was 56 years, 50.5% were women, and 13.2% had metastasis at diagnosis. Overall survival was significantly superior in the period 2016-2020 versus 2013-2015 versus 2010-2012 for the entire population, for patients >18 years of age, and for both metastatic and non-metastatic patients in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001). Over the three periods, we observed a significantly improved compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) nationwide: the proportion of patients biopsied before surgery increased from 62.9% to 72.6%; the percentage of patients presented to NETSARC MDTBs before first surgery increased from 31.7% to 44.4% (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with R0 resection on first surgery increased (from 36.1% to 46.6%), while R2 resection rate decreased (from 10.9% to 7.9%), with a better compliance and improvement in NETSARC centers.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the national reference network for sarcoma was associated with an improvement of overall survival and compliance to guidelines nationwide in sarcoma patients. Referral to expert networks for sarcoma patients should be encouraged, though a better compliance to CPGs can still be achieved.

The concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used by patients with cancer, although they could reduce the absorption of oral anticancer targeted therapies. The US Food and Drug Administration states that the effect of PPIs on the efficacy of dabrafenib use by patients with metastatic melanoma is unknown. As a precautionary measure, the European Society for Medical Oncology recommends avoiding PPIs for patients receiving dabrafenib.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of the concomitant use of PPIs and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors as first-line treatments between 2015 and 2017 in France were selected using the French National Health Insurance database. We compared time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) according to concomitant PPI exposure. We balanced the baseline characteristics of patients exposed and nonexposed to PPIs using an overlap weighting method based on a propensity score.

RESULTS

The metastatic melanoma cohort comprised 1028 patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors, including 361 (35.1%) patients using PPIs. PPI users had more comorbidities and a more severe metastatic disease. After having equally distributed metastatic sites and comorbidities across patients exposed and nonexposed to PPIs, concomitant PPI use was not associated with shorter TTD [weighted hazard ratio (wHR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.24] or OS (wHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.39). Consistent results were observed when restricting the population to patients receiving dabrafenib, or when narrowing exposure to PPIs with stronger inhibition of cytochromes.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population-based cohort of patients with advanced melanoma, the concomitant use of PPIs and BRAF/MEK inhibitors was not associated with worse outcome.

Overall survival and objective response in advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A subanalysis of the REFLECT study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Validated surrogate endpoints for overall survival (OS) are important for expediting the clinical study and drug-development processes. Herein, we aimed to validate objective response as an independent predictor of OS in individuals with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving systemic anti-angiogenic therapy.

METHODS

We investigated the association between objective response (investigator-assessed mRECIST, independent radiologic review [IRR] mRECIST and RECIST v1.1) and OS in REFLECT, a phase III study of lenvatinib vs. sorafenib. We conducted landmark analyses (Simon-Makuch) of OS by objective response at 2, 4, and 6 months after randomization.

RESULTS

Median OS was 21.6 months (95% CI 18.6-24.5) for responders (investigator-assessed mRECIST) vs. 11.9 months (95% CI 10.7-12.8) for non-responders (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61; 95% CI 0.49-0.76; p <0.001). Objective response by IRR per mRECIST and RECIST v1.1 supported the association with OS (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.51-0.72; p <0.001 and HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.39-0.65; p <0.001, respectively). OS was significantly prolonged for responders vs. non-responders (investigator-assessed mRECIST) at the 2-month (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.49-0.76; p <0.001), 4-month (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.51-0.80; p <0.001), and 6-month (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.54-0.86; p <0.001) landmarks. Results were similar when assessed by IRR, with both mRECIST and RECIST v1.1. An exploratory multivariate Cox regression analysis identified objective response by investigator-assessed mRECIST (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.44-0.68; p <0.0001) and IRR-assessed RECIST v1.1 (HR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38-0.64; p <0.0001) as independent predictors of OS in individuals with unresectable HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective response was an independent predictor of OS in individuals with unresectable HCC in REFLECT; additional studies are needed to confirm surrogacy. Participants achieving a complete or partial response by mRECIST or RECIST v1.1 had significantly longer survival vs. those with stable/progressive/non-evaluable disease.

GOV NUMBER

NCT01761266.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

This analysis of data taken from a completed clinical trial (REFLECT) looked for any link between objective response and overall survival time in individuals with unresectable HCC receiving anti-angiogenic treatments. Significantly longer median overall survival was found for responders (21.6 months) vs. non-responders (11.9 months). Overall survival was also significantly longer for responders vs. non-responders (based on objective response status at 2, 4, and 6 months) in the landmark analysis. Our results indicate that objective response is an independent predictor of overall survival in this setting, confirming its validity as a rapid marker of efficacy that can be applied in phase II trials; however, further validation is required to determine is validity for other systemic treatments (e.g. immunotherapies), or as a surrogate of overall survival.

POS1412 FIRSTS RESULTS OF THE PRAISE STUDY (PATIENT-REPORTED AUTOIMMUNITY SECONDARY TO CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY): MULTICENTRIC PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY ON AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES SECONDARY TO CANCER IMMUNOTHÉRAPY

Background

In cancer immunotherapy, T-lymphocyte activation can lead to secondary autoimmune diseases named OASI for Opportunistic Autoimmunity Secondary to cancer Immunotherapy [1]. The epidemiology of OASI deserves to be further studied due to the unadapted reporting of clinical trials and the lack of prospective studies. Moreover, literature focuses on the most severe OASI and/or on specific OASI (myocarditis, colitis, arthritis).

Objectives

Our goal was to determine incidence, severity of all grade OASI using a multicentric prospective patient cohort starting treatment with cancer immunotherapy.

Methods

We present a multicentric, prospective, observational, longitudinal, real life, French e-cohort. 900 patients treated with ipilimumumab and/or nivolumab will be included. Data is collected from the patient and the oncologist at inclusion, then patients report directly any symptom that could be suggestive of OASI with the help of monthly digital questionaries. In case an OASI is suspected, further confirmation is made with the practician in charge and by a paired analysis with the Système National De Santé (SNDS), the French health insurance registry.

Results

On the 19/01/2022, 439 patients were included, 310 males (70.6%) and 129 females (29.4%). Mean age is 66 years old with a median follow up of 192 days. 354 patients (80.6%) are treated with Nivolumab alone, 7 (1.6%) with Ipilimumab alone and 76 (17.8 %) with combined Nivolumab + Ipilimumab. 136 patients (31.6%) are treated for a non-small cell lung carcinoma, 107 patients (24.9%) for a clear cell renal carcinoma, 91 patients (21.2%) for a skin melanoma, 49 patients (11.4%) for a head or neck epidermoid carcinoma, 24 patients (5.6%) for another lung cancer sub-type, and 32 patients (5.3%) for another histological cancer type. The mean follow-up is 294 days (+/- 192). 83 patients (18.9%) died since the beginning of the follow up.

47 patients (10.7%) developed 63 OASI. The mean delay between the beginning of cancer immunotherapy and the OASI is 134.7 days (+/- 103.4).

Approximately, one third of the OASI were musculoskeletal diseases. The OASI included polymyalgia rheumatica (3 patients), psoriatic arthritis (1 patient), polyarthritis (1 patient) systemic lupus (1 patient), arthralgias and myalgias (8 patients), colitis (11 patients), dysthyroïditis (6 patients), hepatitis (4 patients), nephritis (3 patients), pneumonitis (2 patients), hypophysitis (2 patients), adrenal insufficiency (4 patients), myocarditis (1 patient), hemophagocytic lympho-histiocytosis (1 patient), and other types of OASI (15 patients).

26 patients (55% of patients with OASI, 5,9% of all patients) had to stop cancer immunotherapy due to an OASI, one because of a rheumatic disease (systemic lupus). 52 patients were treated with corticosteroids, 1 patient with methotrexate (psoriatic arthritis), 3 patients with infliximab (colitis) and 1 patient with abatacept (myocarditis). 1 patient died after an OASI (colitis).

Conclusion

The first results of this prospective study, using an original patient-centered methodology, confirm the expected incidence of autoimmune events secondary to cancer immunotherapy and the role of rheumatologists in their therapeutic management.

References

[1]Kostine M, Chiche L, Lazaro E, et al. Opportunistic autoimmunity secondary to cancer immunotherapy (OASI): An emerging challenge. Rev Med Interne. 2017;38(8):513-525. doi:10.1016/j.revmed.2017.01.004

Acknowledgements

BMS funded the study (unrestricted grant) but had no role in study design, data collection, analysis or decision to publish.

Disclosure of Interests

Eden Sebbag: None declared, Nicolas Cloarec: None declared, Philippe Barthelemy: None declared, Nathanaël Sedmak: None declared, Naima Hamamouche Consultant of: Work for Sanoia Digital CRO, Hervé Servy Consultant of: Work for Sanoia Digital CRO, Guillaume Desjeux Consultant of: Work for Sanoia Digital CRO, Isabelle Monnet: None declared, Abeer Najem: None declared, Marc Porneuf: None declared, Laetitia-Shanna Rajpar: None declared, Jérôme Meunier: None declared, Tévy San: None declared, Laure Chauvenet: None declared, Ariane DARUT JOUVE: None declared, Sabrina FALKOWSKI: None declared, Claudia Rizzo: None declared, Noémie Litrowski: None declared, Anthony Canellas: None declared, Jean-François Paitel: None declared, Marc Pracht: None declared, Jacques Cadranel: None declared, Laurence Weiss: None declared, Christos Chouaid: None declared, Thomas Aparicio: None declared, Stephane Nancey: None declared, Cécile Arnold: None declared, Erik Sauleau: None declared, Jaqcues-Eric Gottenberg: None declared

The Association Between Antibiotic Use and Outcome Among Metastatic Melanoma Patients Receiving Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Several observational studies have reported a decreased response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) following antibiotic use. ICI activity has been hypothesized to be impaired by antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis.

METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma receiving an anti-PD-1 antibody as a first-line therapy between 2015 and 2017 in France were selected using the French Health Insurance database. We compared overall survival and time-to-treatment discontinuation according to antibiotic exposure in the 3 months prior to the initiation of anti-PD-1 antibody. To disentangle a causal effect of antibiotics from a confounding bias, we balanced characteristics of patients exposed and nonexposed to antibiotics using an overlap weighting method based on a propensity score. We also evaluated a control cohort of patients with advanced melanoma receiving first-line targeted therapy, as there is no rationale for decreased efficacy of targeted therapy following antibiotic treatment.

RESULTS

The anti-PD-1 antibody cohort comprised 2605 individuals. Antibiotic exposure in the 3 months prior to anti-PD-1 antibody initiation was not associated with shorter overall survival (weighted hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.88 to 1.17) or time-to-treatment discontinuation (weighted hazard ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval = 0.89 to 1.11). Consistent results were observed when the time frame of antibiotics was narrowed to 1 month prior to anti-PD-1 initiation or when exposure was restricted to antibiotics leading to more profound gut dysbiosis. Similar results were observed in the targeted therapy cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of advanced melanoma patients, we showed that antibiotic use preceding anti-PD-1 antibody was not associated with worse outcome. Physicians should not delay immunotherapy for patients who have recently received antibiotics.

A Multinational Pilot Study on Patients' Perceptions of Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-GINET21 Questionnaires

Among the available neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN)-specific HR-QoL scales, only the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-G.I.NET21 questionnaires have been validated in several languages. We aim to assess patients' perceptions of these questionnaires. A cross-sectional qualitative pilot study was conducted among 65 adults from four countries with well-differentiated advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) or unknown primary NENs. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-G.I.NET21 questionnaires and then a survey containing statements concerning the questionnaires. The majority of patients had a small intestine NET (52%). Most tumors were functioning (55%) and grade 2 NET (52%). Almost half of the patients identified limitations in the questionnaires, with nine (14%) patients scoring the questionnaires as poor and 16 (25%) patients as moderate. Overall, 37 (57%) patients were positive towards the questionnaires. Approximately a quarter of patients considered the questionnaires not suitable for all ages, missing some of their complaints, not representative of their overall HR-QoL regarding the treatment of their NET and too superficial. The current validated EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-G.I.NET21 questionnaires may show some limitations in the design of questions and the patients' final satisfaction reporting of the questionnaire. Large-scale, high-quality prospective studies are required in HR-QoL assessment regarding NETs.

Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Advanced Well-Differentiated Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multicenter National Retrospective Study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Oxaliplatin-based regimens have shown promising antitumor activity in digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); however, the available data are limited. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of FOLFOX (association of 5-fluorouracil with oxaliplatin) in a large series of patients with advanced digestive NETs.

METHODS

All patients with advanced digestive well-differentiated NETs treated with at least 3 cycles of FOLFOX between January 2004 and December 2018 in 12 centers from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors were included. Tumor response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 criteria, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival, as well as prognostic factors, were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five patients were included. Primary tumor locations were pancreas (n = 89), small intestine (n = 40), unknown with no evidence for lung primary (n = 13), stomach (n = 7), and rectum (n = 6). Median Ki-67 was 10%, and 65% of the tumors were grade 2. The partial response rate was 30% for pancreatic NETs, 12.5% for small intestine NETs, 38.5% for unknown primary NETs, 14% for gastric NETs, and 17% for rectal NETs. Significant prognostic factors for poor PFS after FOLFOX were progressive disease at the beginning of treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.83, p = 0.007), hepatic involvement superior to 50% (HR = 2.67, p = 0.0001), and rectal primary tumor location (HR = 2.6, p = 0.0036). Among pancreatic NETs, insulinomas had a better median PFS (22 months) than other pancreatic NETs (9 months, p = 0.026) and showed a high rate (8/9) of serum glucose normalization.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOX shows a promising antitumor activity in advanced digestive NETs. Rapid symptomatic response is observed in metastatic insulinomas.

Radioembolization With Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

To study the impact of transarterial Yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) in combination with second-line systemic chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

METHODS

In this international, multicenter, open-label phase III trial, patients with CLM who progressed on oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive second-line chemotherapy with or without TARE. The two primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic PFS (hPFS), assessed by blinded independent central review. Random assignment was performed using a web- or voice-based system stratified by unilobar or bilobar disease, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line chemotherapy, and KRAS mutation status.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-eight patients from 95 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with or without TARE; this represents the intention-to-treat population and included 215 patients in the TARE plus chemotherapy group and 213 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; 1-sided P = .0013), with a median PFS of 8.0 (95% CI, 7.2 to 9.2) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. The HR for hPFS was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; 1-sided P < .0001), with a median hPFS of 9.1 (95% CI, 7.8 to 9.7) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. Objective response rates were 34.0% (95% CI, 28.0 to 40.5) and 21.1% (95% CI, 16.2 to 27.1; 1-sided P = .0019) for the TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Median overall survival was 14.0 (95% CI, 11.8 to 15.5) and 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 16.4; 1-sided P = .7229) with a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.32) for TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events were reported more frequently with TARE (68.4% v 49.3%). Both groups received full chemotherapy dose intensity.

CONCLUSION

The addition of TARE to systemic therapy for second-line CLM led to longer PFS and hPFS. Further subset analyses are needed to better define the ideal patient population that would benefit from TARE.

ALBI Score Is a Strong Predictor of Toxicity Following SIRT for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

SIRT, also known as radioembolization, is a new treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the precise role is still not clearly determined. Here, we describe how a new score, ALBI, used to better assess liver functions, can help to select patients for this treatment. We clearly showed that the ALBI grade was associated with toxicity and survival after this treatment.

Abstract

Background: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is an innovative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was designed to better evaluate liver functions in HCC. Methods: We studied, retrospectively, data from patients treated with SIRT for HCC. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of radioembolization-induced liver disease (REILD). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: 222 patients were studied. The ALBI grade 1 patients had significantly less REILD (3.4%) after the first SIRT than ALBI grade 2 or 3 patients (16.8%, p = 0.002). Of the 207 patients with data, 77 (37.2%) had a worsening of ALBI grade after one SIRT. The baseline ALBI grade was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.001), also in the multivariable analysis. The ALBI grade after the first SIRT was significantly associated with OS (p ≤ 0.001), with median OS of 26.4 months (CI 95% 18.2–34.7) for ALBI grade 1 patients (n = 48) versus 17.3 months (CI 95% 12.9–21.8) for ALBI grade 2 patients (n = 123) and 8.1 months (CI 95% 4.1–12.1) for ALBI grade 3 patients (n = 36). Conclusions: The baseline ALBI grade is a strong predictor of REILD. The baseline ALBI score and variations of ALBI are prognostic after SIRT.

Prognostic impact of thyroid dysfunctions on progression-free survival in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies

This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of thyroid dysfunctions in metastatic melanoma patients on anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1). A total of 110 stage IV or inoperable stage III melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 alone or in association with anti-CTLA-4 (T-lymphocyte antigen-4) antibody from January 2015 to December 2017 at our institution were enrolled in this retrospective study. Median follow-up was 32.8 months. Transitory thyroid dysfunctions and permanent thyroid dysfunctions were distinguished. The main criterion was progression-free survival. Secondary criteria were best response and overall survival. Survival curves were compared with log-rank tests and a cox proportional hazard ratio model was used to adjust patients and melanoma characteristics. Thirty-eight (35%) thyroid dysfunctions were observed during the follow-up, including 25 transitory thyroid dysfunctions (23%) and 13 permanent thyroid dysfunctions (12%). Progression-free survival was longer in patients with thyroid dysfunction (18.1 months) than in patients without thyroid dysfunction (3.9 months, P = 0.0085). In multivariate analysis, thyroid dysfunctions were not an independent predictive factor for progression-free survival. Patients with thyroid dysfunction had a longer overall survival (P = 0.0021), and thyroid dysfunctions were associated with a lower mortality risk (hazard ratio = 0.40; P = 0.005). Best response was positively associated with thyroid dysfunctions (P = 0.048). Thyroid dysfunctions induced by anti-PD-1 were not an independent predictive factor for progression-free survival in metastatic melanoma patients but seemed associated with a better response and increased overall survival.

Exploratory circulating biomarker analyses: lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (L + P) in a phase 1b trial in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)

4084

Background: In a phase 1b trial (NCT03006926), L + P had promising antitumor activity as first-line (1L) therapy in uHCC. We present exploratory biomarker analyses of circulating angiogenic factors and cytokines/chemokines related to the mechanism of action of L + P (ie, pharmacodynamic [PD] biomarkers), as well as biomarker correlations with clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with uHCC, from this trial. Methods: Pts received lenvatinib 12 mg/d (bodyweight [BW] >60 kg) or 8 mg/d (BW < 60 kg) PO + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W. Tumors were assessed using mRECIST or RECIST v1.1 per independent imaging review. Peripheral blood samples were collected before administration of study drug at baseline, cycle (C) 2, day (D) 1, C3D1, C4D1, and off-treatment. 43 Biomarkers were assayed in serum from 100 1L uHCC pts (excluding 4 pts from the dose-limiting toxicity part of the trial with prior sorafenib). Of these 43, 31 biomarkers (for which ≤20% of samples had measurements above/below the quantification limit of the assay) were included in the analyses. Changes in biomarker levels from baseline were evaluated via 1-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Associations were explored between changes in biomarker levels and maximum tumor shrinkage (MTS) via the Spearman’s rank correlation test, objective response (OR; complete response + partial response) via the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and PFS via Cox regression analysis and log rank test. Data cutoff date for clinical endpoints was 7 August 2020. Results: Levels of PD biomarkers related to angiogenic signaling (VEGF increase/ANG2 decrease), FGF signaling (increase in FGF23/FGF19), and IFNγ signaling (increase in IFNγ, CXCL9/10/11) were changed significantly (adjusted P< 0.05) with L + P (C2D1–C4D1; except for FGF19 at C3D1). Significant decreases of TIMP1 and increases of MCP1 were observed at C4D1 during treatment; these were associated with greater MTS. Greater decreases in TIMP1 and greater increases in MCP1 were observed in pts with OR vs others. Changes in levels of the PD biomarkers ANG2, IL10, and VEGFR2 were found to be associated with PFS by dichotomized analysis. With tertile 2 cutoff, median PFS for pts in the group with greater decreases of ANG2 was 13.9 months vs 9.6 months for pts in the group with lesser decreases of ANG2 (unadjusted P= 0.002; HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.39–5.08). Conclusions: These are the first exploratory biomarker analyses for the single-arm study of L + P in pts with uHCC. Changes in serum biomarkers associated with angiogenic-, FGF-, and IFNγ-signaling pathways indicated target engagement of L + P. Decreases in TIMP1 and increases in MCP1 were associated with MTS and OR. Associations were found between longer PFS and a greater decrease in levels of ANG2. Angiogenesis inhibition and modulation of cancer immune response were observed with L + P. Further validation from independent studies is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03006926.

Phase I-II Open-Label Multicenter Study of Palbociclib + Vemurafenib in BRAF V600MUT Metastatic Melanoma Patients: Uncovering CHEK2 as a Major Response Mechanism

PURPOSE

In BRAF ^V600MUT metastatic melanoma, cyclin D-CDK4/6-INK4-Rb pathway alterations are involved in resistance to MAPK inhibitors, suggesting a clinical benefit of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) inhibitors. In this phase I-II study, we aimed to establish the MTD of palbociclib when added to vemurafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with BRAF ^V600E/KMUT metastatic melanoma harboring CDKN2A loss and RB1 expression were included and stratified into two groups according to previous BRAF inhibitor treatment (no:strata 1; yes:strata 2). Treatment comprised palbociclib once daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day break + continuous dosing of vemurafenib. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the secondary endpoints included the best response, survival, pharmacokinetics, and tumor molecular profiling.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled, with 15 in strata 2. Characteristics at inclusion were American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IVM1c (N = 16; 88.9%), high lactate dehydrogenase (N = 9; 50.0%), and median number of previous treatments of 2. One and 5 patients experienced DLT in strata 1 and 2, respectively, defining the MTD at palbociclib 25 mg and vemurafenib 960 mg in strata 2. No significant evidence for drug-drug interactions was highlighted. The median progression-free survival was 2.8 months, and 5 (27.8%) patients showed a clinical response. The baseline differential mRNA expression analysis and in vitro data revealed the role of CHEK2 in the response to palbociclib.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the combination of palbociclib + fixed-dose vemurafenib did not allow an increased palbociclib dosage above 25 mg, a significant clinical benefit was achieved in pretreated patients with melanoma. An association between the transcriptomic data and clinical response was highlighted.

Results from the phase I dose-escalation study of the radiation enhancer NBTXR3 for the treatment of HCC and liver metastases

319

Background: NBTXR3, a first-in-class radioenhancer composed of functionalized hafnium oxide nanoparticles, is administered by one time intratumoral injection (ITI) and activated by radiotherapy (RT), such as stereotactic body RT (SBRT). NBTXR3 increases RT energy deposit inside tumor cells and subsequently increases tumor cell death compared to RT alone, while sparing healthy tissues. SBRT is well-tolerated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases (mets) and a valuable alternative for patients not eligible for surgery or radiofrequency ablation. However, energy dose deposit to tumor cells is limited due to potential toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. Patients with unresectable liver cancers including patients with liver or renal dysfunction might benefit from NBTXR3. A Phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of NBTXR3 activated by SBRT [NCT02721056] in these patients, here we report the results. Methods: A 3+3 dose escalation scheme tested 5 NBTXR3 levels: 10, 15, 22, 33, and 42% of baseline tumor volume. NBTXR3 ITI was followed by SBRT (45 Gy / 3 fractions / 5-7 days or 50 Gy / 5 fractions / up to 15 days) in patients with HCC or liver mets. Primary endpoints included RP2D determination and early DLT incidence. Secondary endpoints include safety profile, liver disease scores evolution, and early efficacy by response rate (mRECIST for HCC/RECIST 1.1 for liver mets). Results: 23 patients were treated: 6 patients at 10% (2 SBRT doses tested due to organ constraints), 4 patients each at 15% and 22% (due to fiducial displacement and ITI shift), 3 patients at 33% and 6 patients at 42%. No early DLT was observed at any dose level. 1 SAE (grade 3 late onset bile duct stenosis) related to NBTXR3 and RT occurred at 22%. There were 11 AEs related to NBTXR3 and/or ITI, of which grade 3 AEs were: 2 abdominal pain (ITI related; 15%) and 1 late onset bile duct stenosis (22%), lesion close to the bile duct. No NBTXR3 or ITI related grade 4-5 AEs were observed. RT related AEs were as expected with SBRT. No clinically meaningful changes in Child-Pugh score or APRI were observed post-treatment. CT-scan showed NBTXR3 present within the tumor without leakage to surrounding healthy tissues. Best observed responses (MRI) in injected target lesions from HCC patients (n = 15) were 5 CRs (33.3%), 5 PRs(33.3%), 1 SD (6.7%), 2 NE (13.3%), 2 patients did not have post baseline MRI and for liver mets (n = 8) were 5 PRs (62.5%), 2 SD (25.0%) and 1 NE (12.5%). Conclusions: No early DLTs were observed and NBTXR3 demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile. The RP2D was determined to be 42% of tumor volume. Initial efficacy is promising and highlights the potential for NBTXR3 to address an unmet medical need in patients with unresectable primary or metastatic liver cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT02721056.

Phase Ib Study of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The immunomodulatory effect of lenvatinib (a multikinase inhibitor) on tumor microenvironments may contribute to antitumor activity when combined with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) signaling inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We report results from a phase Ib study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) in unresectable HCC (uHCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label multicenter study, patients with uHCC received lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥ 60 kg, 12 mg; < 60 kg, 8 mg) orally daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The study included a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) phase and an expansion phase (first-line patients). Primary objectives were safety/tolerability (DLT phase), and objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by modified RECIST (mRECIST) and RECIST version 1.1 (v1.1) per independent imaging review (IIR; expansion phase).

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were enrolled. No DLTs were reported (n = 6) in the DLT phase; 100 patients (expansion phase; included n = 2 from DLT phase) had received no prior systemic therapy and had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (n = 29) or C disease (n = 71). At data cutoff, 37% of patients remained on treatment. Median duration of follow-up was 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.5 months). Confirmed ORRs by IIR were 46.0% (95% CI, 36.0% to 56.3%) per mRECIST and 36.0% (95% CI, 26.6% to 46.2%) per RECIST v1.1. Median DORs by IIR were 8.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 months to not estimable [NE]) per mRECIST and 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 months to NE) per RECIST v1.1. Median progression-free survival by IIR was 9.3 months per mRECIST and 8.6 months per RECIST v1.1. Median overall survival was 22 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67% (grade 5, 3%) of patients. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab has promising antitumor activity in uHCC. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals.

Ramucirumab in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated alpha-fetoprotein after sorafenib in REACH and REACH-2

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Limited data on treatment of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) increase the unmet need. REACH and REACH-2 were global phase III studies of ramucirumab in patients with HCC after prior sorafenib, where patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL showed an overall ssurvival (OS) benefit for ramucirumab. These post-hoc analyses examined efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in patients with HCC and baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL by three prespecified age subgroups (<65, ≥65 to <75 and ≥75 years).

METHODS

Individual patient data were pooled from REACH (baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL) and REACH-2. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods (stratified by study) assessed OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP) and patient-reported outcomes (Functional Hepatobiliary System Index-8 [FHSI-8] score).

RESULTS

A total of 542 patients (<65 years: n = 302; ≥65 to <75 years: n = 160; ≥75 years: n = 80) showed similar baseline characteristics between ramucirumab and placebo. Older subgroups had higher hepatitis C and steatohepatitis incidences, and lower AFP levels, than the <65 years subgroup. Ramucirumab prolonged OS in patients <65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.753; 95% CI 0.581-0.975), ≥65 to <75 years (0.602; 0.419-0.866) and ≥75 years (0.709; 0.420-1.199), PFS and TTP irrespective of age. Ramucirumab showed similar overall safety profiles across subgroups, with a consistent median relative dose intensity ≥97.8%. A trend towards a delay in symptom deterioration in FHSI-8 with ramucirumab was observed in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post-hoc analysis, ramucirumab showed a survival benefit across age subgroups with a tolerable safety profile, supporting its use in advanced HCC with elevated AFP, irrespective of age, including ≥75 years.

A phase Ib study of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)

4519

Background: LEN is a multikinase inhibitor of VEGFR 1–3, FGFR 1–4, PDGFRα, RET, and KIT, approved for first line (1L) treatment of uHCC. PEMBRO, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, was granted accelerated approval for the treatment of patients (pts) with HCC after sorafenib therapy. We assessed the safety and efficacy of LEN + PEMBRO in uHCC. Methods: In this phase 1b trial (NCT03006926), pts received LEN 12 mg/day (bodyweight [BW] ≥60 kg) or 8 mg/day (BW <60 kg) orally + PEMBRO 200 mg IV on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability for Part 1 and objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by mRECIST and RECIST v1.1 per independent imaging review (IIR) in the 1L setting for Part 2. Results: 104 pts (part 1, n=6; part 2, n=98) were enrolled. No DLTs were reported in Part 1; 100 pts were included in the 1L analysis of LEN + PEMBRO–4 pts (part 1) excluded due to prior sorafenib. At data cutoff (October 31, 2019) and median follow-up of 10.6 months, 37 pts continued treatment (LEN only, n=3; both drugs, n=34); median duration of treatment was 7.9 months (LEN, 7.6 months; PEMBRO, 7.4 months). Median OS was 22.0 months (95% CI 20.4–not estimable [NE]), median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI 7.1–9.7), and ORR was 36% (95% CI 26.6–46.2) (RECIST v1.1 per IIR). Additional efficacy outcomes are shown in the table. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 99% of pts (grade ≥3, 85%; grade ≥4, 23%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAE was hypertension (18% of pts). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 95% of pts (grade ≥3, 67%; grade ≥4, 4%). The most common grade ≥3 TRAE was hypertension (17% of pts). 36% of pts had serious TRAEs and 3 pts died from a TRAE (acute respiratory failure/acute respiratory distress syndrome, n=1; intestinal perforation, n=1; abnormal hepatic function, n=1). Conclusions: LEN + PEMBRO has promising antitumor activity with a tolerable safety profile. An ongoing phase 3 trial (NCT03713593) is assessing LEN + PEMBRO vs LEN alone as 1L therapy for uHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03006926 . [Table: see text]

Lymphocytes and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Variations After Selective Internal Radiation Treatment for HCC: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has been proposed for combination with immunotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the toxicity of radiation toward lymphocytes is understudied after SIRT. The aim of this study was to describe variations of lymphocytes following SIRT and their potential prognostic impact.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 164 patients treated with SIRT for HCC. Lymphocyte count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio were evaluated at baseline and at 3 months. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median baseline lymphocyte count was 1.32 Giga/Liter (G/L) (standard deviation (SD) 0.64) at baseline versus 0.68 G/L (SD 0.41) at 3 months. The mean decrease of lymphocyte count was - 44% (standard deviation 0.24). At 3 months, only 21% of patients had normal (1 G/L or more) lymphocyte count, and 23% had lymphocyte count < 0.5 G/L. NLR at 3 months was significantly and independently associated with OS in multivariate Cox model. Median OS was 9.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-13.5) for patients with NLR at 3 months higher than 7.2 compared to 19.9 months in patients with an NLR lower that the 7.2 threshold (95% CI 16.3-23.3) (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in lymphocytes was frequent and deep after SIRT for HCC. NLR increase at 3 months was associated with poor survival.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases with hafnium oxide nanoparticles activated by SBRT: A phase I/II trial

537

Background: Treatment of unresectable liver cancer or liver metastases (mets) by stereotactic body radiotherapy is well tolerated but limited by the need to preserve liver function. Increasing energy deposition in the tumor while at the same time maintaining the dose in healthy tissue remains a major challenge in radiation oncology that could be achieved by NBTXR3 (hafnium oxide nanoparticles) when activated by radiotherapy (RT). NBTXR3 augments energy dose deposit within tumor cells, increasing tumor cell death compared to RT alone, while sparing healthy tissues. Patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastasis (mets) may benefit from the mode of action of NBTXR3. A phase I/II clinical trial has been conducted to evaluate NBTXR3 activated by SBRT in these pts [NCT02721056]. Methods: The Phase I used a 3+3 dose escalation scheme with 5 NBTXR3 dose levels: 10, 15, 22, 33, and 42% of baseline tumor volume. NBTXR3 was administered by intratumoral injection (ITI) followed by SBRT (45 Gy / 3 fractions / 5 to 7 days or 50 Gy / 5 fractions / 15 days). Primary endpoints were identification of the recommended Phase II Dose and early DLTs. Secondary endpoints included safety profile, liver function evaluated by Child-Pugh score (CPS), AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), and early efficacy by response rate (mRECIST/RECIST 1.1). Results: The dose escalation levels of 10, 15, 22 and 33% are completed (n = 17): 6 pts at 10% (2 SBRT doses tested due to organ constraints), 4 pts each at 15% and 22% (due to fiducial displacement and ITI shift) and 3 pts at 33%. No early DLT was observed and only one SAE (bile duct stenosis) related to NBTXR3 and RT occurred. CPS and APRI did not show clinically meaningful changes post-treatment and CT-scan showed no leakage of NBTXR3 into surrounding tissues. Best response for HCC (n = 8) were 5CR, 3PR and for mets (n = 6) the results were: 3 PR, 3SD. Conclusions: ITI of NBTXR3 is feasible, demonstrated a very good safety and tolerability profile up to the 33% dose level. Recruitment needs to be finalized at the 42% dose level. Based on early efficacy results NBTXR3 has the potential to address an unmet medical need in pts with unresectable primary or metastatic liver cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02721056.

Radioembolization Plus Chemotherapy for First-line Treatment of Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) have a poor prognosis. Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) is a promising treatment option for hepatic tumors, but no prospective studies of combination SIRT with chemotherapy have been published to our knowledge.

Objective

To determine the response rate after SIRT combined with chemotherapy in patients with unresectable ICC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2 clinical trial, the Yttrium-90 Microspheres in Cholangiocarcinoma (MISPHEC) trial, included patients with unresectable ICC who have never received chemotherapy or intra-arterial therapy and were treated at 7 centers which had experience with SIRT between November 12, 2013, and June 21, 2016. Statistical analysis was performed from March 31, 2017, to June 17, 2019.

Interventions

Concomitant first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 (gemcitabine reduced to 300 mg/m2 for the cycles just before and after SIRT), on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for 8 cycles. Selective internal radiotherapy was administered during cycle 1 (1 hemiliver disease) or cycles 1 and 3 (disease involving both hemilivers) using glass Y90 microspheres.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Response rate at 3 months according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Secondary end points were toxic effects, progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate, and response rate according to Choi criteria.

Results

Of 41 patients included in the study, 26 (63%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 64.0 (10.7) years. Response rate according to RECIST was 39% (90% CI, 26%-53%) at 3 months according to local review and was confirmed at 41% as best response by central review; disease control rate was 98%. According to Choi criteria, the response rate was 93%. After a median follow-up of 36 months (95% CI, 26-52 months), median progression-free survival was 14 months (95% CI, 8-17 months), with progression-free survival rates of 55% at 12 months and 30% at 24 months. Median overall survival was 22 months (95% CI, 14-52 months), with overall survival rates of 75% at 12 months and 45% at 24 months. Of 41 patients, 29 (71%) had grades 3 to 4 toxic effects; 9 patients (22%) could be downstaged to surgical intervention, with 8 (20%) achieving R0 (microscopic-free margins) surgical resection. After a median of 46 months (95% CI, 31 months to not reached) after surgery, median relapse-free survival was not reached among patients who underwent resection.

Conclusions and Relevance

Combination chemotherapy and SIRT had antitumor activity as first-line treatment of unresectable ICC, and a significant proportion of patients were downstaged to surgical intervention. A phase 3 trial is ongoing.

[Management of cancer patients with oral therapy at home in Brittany and Pays de la Loire areas: Survey (end of 2016) and cartography]

INTRODUCTION

The Cancer Observatory, from the OMEDITs (Observatory for Medicines and Medical Devices and Treatment Innovations) of Bretagne and Pays de la Loire areas has conducted a survey aiming to know and map the current practices of management of patients by Oral Anti-cancer Drug (OAD) in inter-region.

METHODS

Forty eight cancer centers received by e-mail in July and October 2016 a questionnaire concerning the management of OADs : from prescription by the specialist of oncology, to the intervention of the pharmacist (analysis and pharmaceutical consulting), to follow-up by nurse, as well as the financing of this activity and the feelings of the actors about this organizational set up.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven professionals from 31 centers, including the most important ones, responded to the survey. As a result, half of the establishments carry out a pharmaceutical analysis for some or all of the OAD prescriptions and only 30% carry out a pharmaceutical consulting. The nurse consultation is, on the other hand, more largely implanted (74% of the centers) as well as the telephone follow-up (6%). More than 90% of professionals believe that the organizational set up could be improved and more secure by, at least, the stronger involvement of pharmacists, the development of tools for nurse (for monitoring, therapeutic education…) and by improving the city-hospital link.

CONCLUSION

This survey shows the variability in the management of patients under OAD because of the lack of resources to ensure the fairness and sustainability of the organizational set up. The hospital/city link could still be optimized to secure patient care.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO)

BACKGROUND

This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) updated in December 2018.

DESIGN

This collaborative work summarizes clinical practice recommendations (guidelines) on the management of GISTs. It is based on recent literature review, ESMO recommendations and expert opinions.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of GIST is based on histological examination and immunohistochemistry with markers KIT and DOG-1. Each case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary team. Complete surgical resection tumour, avoiding peroperative perforation, is the potentially curative treatment of localized GISTs. The estimation of the recurrence risk is essential, or adjuvant treatment,and follow-up adaptation. Genotyping (KIT and PDGFRA) of all but very low-risk GISTs is recommended. The nature of mutation has a prognostic value and predictive influence on drug efficacy. Imatinib, a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, is the standard adjuvant treatment after R0 resection of a GIST with a high risk of recurrence, and the first line therapy for advanced GISTs. Suninitib and regorafenib are respectively the second- and third-line standard treatments for advanced GISTs.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines for management of GISTs are continuously evolving and need to be regularly updated. This constant progress is made possible through clinical and translational research.

Monitoring of neuroendocrine tumors in elderly patients in the Brittany region

e15690

Background: NeuroEndocrine Tumors (NETs) remain a poorly known entity, especially in older patients. The therapeutic management is multidisciplinary combining surgery, interventional radiology, chemotherapy, cancer supportive care and also geriatrics oncology. The aim of this study performed by the OncoGeriatry Coordination Unit (UCOG) of Brittany, in collaboration with the National Reference Network for the management of NET (RENATEN), was to analyze the current management of NETs in older patients (more than 75 years old) and to develop recommandations to optimize the management of elderly patients with NENs. RENATEN’s guidelines mean systematic discussion of the cases in Regional Multidiscplinary Tumor Board (MTB) dedicated to NETs (RENATEN MTB). Methods: This study is a retrospective observational study including patients aged 75 years and over, with a NET that has been diagnosed in an pathological laboratory or whose file has been discussed in a MTB (usual MTB or RENATEN MTB) between 2014 and 2017 in the Brittany area. Results: 51 patients with a median age of 79 years [75-92] have been included up until now, among whom 77% had digestive NET, 12% urological, 8% dermatological (Merkel tumor), 4% pulmonary, 2% gynecological and 2% NETs of unknown origin. Tumor grade was 1, 2, 3 and unkown in 20%, 14%, 37% and 29% respectively. Overall, 33% of the tumors were well differentiated and 63% were metastatic (synchronous metastases :78%). Only 20% of patients benefited from a geriatric oncology consultation to help the clinician in the therapeutic decision. File of 53% of patients has been discussed one time in a specialized RENATEN MTB and 57% in another MTB. No proof of discussion in MTB was found in 12%. The treatment proposed in the RENATEN MTB was effective in 85% of patients (2 patients died immediately after RENATEN MTB, 2 patients did not wish to be treated). Only 14% of patients received initial surgery, 10% radiotherapy and 41% chemotherapy. The overall survival of this cohort is 11.3 months [0.3 -89] (for grade 3, 7.9 months [0.8-21.7]). Conclusions: The rate of multidisciplinary meeting presentation has to be improved, as well as the geriatric oncology management. A cohort of more than 100 patients will be presented at the meeting and treatment response and survival data based on age class, tumor grade, histological subtypes and therapeutic strategy will be shown.

First-in-class hafnium oxide nanoparticles NBTXR3 in the treatment of liver cancers

e15642

Background: Hafnium oxide nanoparticles, NBTXR3, increase the effect of radiotherapy (RT) by enhancing local energy dose deposit within tumor cells, resulting in increased cell death compared to the same dose of RT alone. NBTXR3 efficacy was demonstrated in a phase II/III study in soft tissue sarcoma (NCT02379845) and is currently evaluated in other solid tumors including liver cancers. The use of this radio enhancer is particularly relevant in liver cancer management, a difficult to treat heterogenous population, due to the presence of underlying liver dysfunction. Methods: Phase I/II study of NBTXR3 activated by RT in patients (pts) with HCC (with/without portal vein tumor thrombus) or liver metastasis (mets) [NCT02721056]. The dose escalation part followed a 3+3 design with tested dose levels equivalent to 10%, 15%, 22% and 33% of baseline tumor volume. Patients were treated with a single intralesional injection (ILI) of NBTXR3 followed by Stereotaxic Body RT (SBRT: 45 Gy/3 fractions/5 to 7 days). Determination of recommended dose(s) and early dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints include assessment of global safety profile, liver function evaluated by Child-Pugh score (CPS), AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), and response rate (mRECIST/RECIST 1.1). Results: The 4 levels of ILI dose escalation were finalized (n = 17): 6 pts at 10% (2 SBRT doses tested due to organs constraints), 4 pts at 15% and 22% (due to fiducial displacement and ILI shift) and 3 pts at 33% were included. ILIs were successful and SBRT was delivered as planned with no observed DLT or NBTXR3-related SAE at all levels. Only one grade 1 AE (fatigue) related to NBTXR3 was reported at dose level 33%. No relevant change of CPS or APRI was observed over time. Among 7 evaluable HCC pts the best target lesion responses by mRECIST were: 3 CR and 4 PR and among 5 evaluable mets pts: 2 PR, 1 SD and 2 PD. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility and good tolerance of the first in class NBTXR3 ILI. These results have supported a protocol amendment adding a higher dose of NBTXR3 (42% of the tumor volume). This innovative approach might constitute a valuable solution for patients with unresectable liver tumors and liver dysfunction. Clinical trial information: NCT02721056.

Oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) in advanced well-differentiated digestive neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter national retrospective study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors (GTE)

4104

Background: Oxaliplatin-based regimens have shown promising antitumor activity in digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), however the available data are limited. Our aim was to assess the tumor response and survival in a large series of patients treated with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) for advanced digestive NETs.Oxaliplatin-based regimens have shown promising antitumor activity in digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), however the available data are limited. Our aim was to assess the tumor response and survival in a large series of patients treated with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) for advanced digestive NETs. Methods: All patients with advanced well-differentiated digestive NETs treated with at least 3 cycles of FOLFOX between 2004 and 2018 in 12 centers of the French GTE, were retrospectively included. Best response according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The prognostic factors for PFS were investigated by multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model including variables with a p value ⩽ 0.20 in univariate analysis. Results: One hundred and forty-nine patients were included. Primary tumor location was pancreas (n = 88), small intestine (n = 37), stomach (n = 7), rectum (n = 4) and unknown without lung tumor at CT scan (n = 13). Partial response rate was of 31% for pancreatic NETs, 13% for small intestine NETs, 14% for gastric NETs, 25% for rectal NETs and 38% for unknown primary NETs. Median PFS were, respectively, 9, 9, 14, 4 and 6 months, and median OS were 30, 28, 31, 25 and 15 months. Significant poor prognostic factors for PFS after FOLFOX in digestive NETs were: progressive disease (HR = 2.5, p = 0.018), hepatic involvement > 50% (HR = 1.8, p = 0.009), prior targeted therapy (HR = 1.5, p = 0.048) and rectal primary tumor (HR = 4.2, p = 0.01). Among pancreatic NETs, the 9 insulinomas had a 22 months PFS versus 9 months for the others (p = 0.025), and serum glucose normalization was obtained in 8 out of 9 cases. Conclusions: FOLFOX has a promising clinical activity for gastroenteropancreatic NETs, especially in insulinomas.

Phase I-II open label multicenter study of PD0332991 in BRAFV600mut metastatic melanoma patients harboring CDKN2A loss and RB1 expression and treated with vemurafenib

9545

Background: Among mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), cell cycle effectors including CDK4 have been involved in ERK reactivation. In this phase I-II open label study, we aimed to establish the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of PD0332991, an inhibitor of CDK4/6, when added to vemurafenib (VM) in metastatic melanoma patients. Methods: Patients with BRAFV600E/K mutated metastatic melanoma harbouring CDKN2A loss and RB1 expression were included. Patients were treated with a 14 days followed by 7 days rest daily dosing schedule of PD0332991 + continuous BID dosing of VM, and stratified into 2 groups according to previous BRAFi treatment (no group 1, yes group 2). Dose levels (PD0332991 (mg/QD)/VM (mg/BID) ranged from 25/720 to 200/960. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a DLT within the first 2 cycles of therapy. Secondary endpoints included best response (RECIST), OS, PFS, pharmacokinetics parameters, tumour molecular profiling on baseline lesions using transcriptomic and NGS analysis. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, among them 16 (84%) in group 2, with 18.5 months median follow-up. Characteristics at baseline were: male 11 (58%), median age 54.4 years, unresectable stage IIIC 2 (11%), stage IV 17 (89%), M1C 12 (67%), high LDH 9 (47%), median time from advanced melanoma diagnosis to inclusion 26.8 months, ≥ 2 lines therapy 13 (68%). A DLT was observed for 1 and 5 patients in group 1 and 2 respectively, defining the MTD at PD0332991 25mg and VM 960mg in group 2. No significant evidence for drug-drug interaction between PD0332991 and VM was highlighted. In group 2, ORR was estimated to 4 (25%), SD to 8 (50%), median PFS to 9.3 months and median OS to 13.2 months. Baseline transcriptomic analysis revealed high alteration rate associated with clinical response and enrichment in genes related to MAPK, cell cycle and apoptosis pathways. Conclusions: While combination of fixed dose of PD0332991 + VM did not allow us to increase PD0332991 dosage above 25mg, significant clinical benefit was achieved in heavily pretreated patients; baseline molecular analysis revealed an association between transcriptomic data and clinical response. Clinical trial information: NCT02202200.

Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab in advanced cutaneous melanoma : Results from real-life data in patients from France— Evaluation of use, current practices and medico economic approach

e21009

Background: In 2016, Nivolumab (N) and Pembrolizumab (P) have been registred for first line ECOG PS 0-1 adult patients with non-resecable or metastatic melanoma. The Brittany and Pays de la Loire Cancer Observatory has collected data on their real-life indications, current management, safety, efficacy and medico-economics Methods: All non opposing adult patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous melanoma who initiated a treatment with N (3 mg/kg q2w) or P (2 mg/kg q3w) in 2016 and 2017 were included. Minimum follow-up for survival was 12 months. Sex, age, mutation profile, lines of treatment, toxicities, response rate, survival and treatment cost have been collected. Results: 149 pts were treated by N and 201 pts by P with a median age of respectively 68 [21-88] and 69 years [28-96]. Of the 350 patients, 34% were at least 75 years and around 30% presented a BRAF mutation. The median duration of treatment was 4.9 months [0-34.6] for N and 4.2 [0-35.8] for P (Not Significant NS). 65% of pts were treated in 1st line for N and 69% for P. 24% of the pts were treated in 2nd line for both treatments. 81% of the pts had a baseline PS of 0 or 1. All lines combined (first line for wt BRAF and first or second line for m BRAF melanoma), clinical benefit was 53% for N and 47% for P. Median OS was respectively 21.7 m for N and 22.8 m for P (NS). mPFS were respectively 6.4 m and 4.6 m (NS). 18% of pts presented grade III/IV toxicities with N and 17% with P. wt BRAF pts showed more grade III/IV toxicities than m BRAF pts (p = 0.046). For N, pts with grade III/IV toxicities showed better PFS (p = 0.051) and OS (p = 0.064). For both cohorts, PS ≥2, BRAF status and treatment line identified subgroup of pts with worsened PFS and OS 55% (24/44) of pts who stopped N or P because of death had a baseline PS of 0-1 showing PS alone is not sufficient to predict survival. Aggressive diseases (high metastasis rate, cerebro-meningeal metastasis, high tumor growth rate with any previous treatment) appear to be the worse candidates for immunotherapy. N and P courses during the 2 years costed 6.6 and 9.7 millions of euros respectively with approximatively 84% or 79% of this cost for N and P clinically benefitting pts. Conclusions: Immunotherapy in real-life setting in cutaneous advanced melanomas confirms literature’s data regarding clinical benefit, survival rate and safety profile and suggests to think about a composite predictive biomarker including BRAF status, ECOG PS, toxicity and treatment line.

Ramucirumab (RAM) for sorafenib intolerant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated baseline alpha fetoprotein (AFP): Outcomes from two randomized phase 3 studies (REACH, REACH2)

4073

Background: Oral multikinase inhibitors that have shown improvements in overall survival (OS) in HCC are associated with clinically important toxicities that commonly require dose adjustment or discontinuation (D/C) due to intolerance. REACH and REACH-2 studied RAM in patients (pts) with HCC who progressed on or were intolerant to sorafenib (SOR), and REACH-2 only enrolled pts with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. In REACH-2 RAM treatment (trt) improved OS compared to placebo (P), supporting findings in REACH pts with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. An exploratory analysis of outcomes by reason for D/C of SOR was performed. Methods: Pts had advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0-1, and prior SOR. Pts were randomized to RAM 8 mg/kg or P Q2W. A pooled independent pt data analysis (stratified by study) of REACH-2 and REACH pts (AFP ≥400 mg/mL) was performed. Results are reported by reason for SOR D/C (intolerance or disease progression). OS and PFS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety are reported. Results: Baseline characteristics in the pooled population were generally balanced between trt arms in each subgroup. Median durations of prior SOR were 2.5 mo for SOR intolerant (n = 70) and 4.0 mo for SOR progressors (n = 472). Median OS (RAM v P) was 10.2 v 6.7 mo for SOR intolerant and 8.0 v 4.7 mo for SOR progressors (Table). Rates of D/C due to trt-related adverse events (AEs) (Table) (7% in each subgroup), and Grade ≥3 AEs (most frequently hypertension) were consistent with those observed in each study. Conclusions: Acknowledging limitations of sample size, the RAM trt benefit in SOR intolerant pts was consistent with that in the ITT population. RAM was well tolerated in SOR intolerant pts with low rates of D/C due to related-AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01140347, NCT02435433. [Table: see text]

Ramucirumab (RAM) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated baseline α-fetoprotein (AFP): An analysis of AFP kinetics in the phase III REACH-2 study

326

Background: REACH-2 (NCT02435433) demonstrated a significant survival benefit with RAM vs placebo in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced HCC and AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. This analysis investigated changes in AFP during treatment, as well as potential relationships with survival or progression. Methods: Patients were randomized (2:1) to RAM 8 mg/kg IV or placebo Q2W plus best supportive care until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Serum AFP levels were measured at baseline and every 3 cycles. Percent change in AFP from baseline was analyzed at each time point up to Cycle 12 with descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank sum test between treatment arms. AFP response was defined as ≥ 20% decrease from baseline. The association between AFP progression and radiographic progression in each time interval was assessed by odds ratio [OR] and Fisher’s exact test. Time to AFP progression and time to radiographic progression (TTP) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatment arms using a stratified log-rank test. AFP progression was defined as ≥ 20% increase from baseline. Hazard ratio (HR) was generated using a stratified Cox regression model. Results: AFP response was significantly higher with RAM compared with placebo (42.1% vs 10.5%, p < 0.0001). Overall survival (OS) was longer in patients with AFP response (13.5 months) than in patients without (6.7 months), irrespective of treatment (HR 0.470, p < 0.0001). The median percent increase in AFP level from baseline was smaller in the patient population treated with RAM (0.4%, 6.1%, 15.4%, 10.8%) than with placebo (45.7%, 98.5%, 122.2%, 91.3%) at Cycles 3, 6, 9 and 12, respectively. Time to AFP progression (HR 0.422, p < 0.0001) and TTP (HR 0.427, p < 0.0001) favored a RAM benefit; subsequent analyses demonstrated a strong association between AFP progression and radiographic progression at 6 weeks (OR 2.44, p < 0.0084) and at 12 weeks (OR 1.89, p = 0.0430). Conclusions: Changes in AFP levels were associated with TTP and OS. RAM prolonged time to AFP progression and radiographic TTP, and slowed the rate of AFP increase during treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT02435433.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis treated by hafnium oxide nanoparticles activated by SBRT: A phase I/II trial

340

Background: Hafnium oxide nanoparticles, NBXTR3, were developed to increase the tumor-localized high energy deposit once activated by ionizing radiation such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and thus to increase tumor cell death compared to the same dose of radiation. NBTXR3 is characterized by a single intratumor/intralesional (IL) administration and fits into standard RT schedule with no change in patient’s flow, treatment protocol or equipment. Herein the preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial evaluating this combination in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastasis (mets). Methods: HCC and liver mets patients were treated with an IL injection of NBTXR3 followed by SBRT (15 Gy∗3 fractions). The phase I part of the trial follows a 3+3 dose escalation design at dose levels of NBTXR3 corresponding to 10%, 15%, 22%, 33% of the baseline tumor volume. This study aims primarily to identify the Recommended Dose and the incidence of early Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) of NBTXR3 activated by SBRT. Secondary endpoints include assessment of global safety profile, liver function evaluated by Child-Pugh score (CPS), AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), and response rate (mRECIST/RECIST 1.1). Results: Enrollment is at the last dose level, 33%, and completed at 10% (6 pts), 15% (4 pts) and 22% (4 pts). So far, no early DLTs nor severe adverse events related to NBTXR3 were observed. Both CPS and APRI did not reveal important variations in accordance to NBTXR3 low toxicity. The best observed target lesions responses, among 7 evaluable HCC pts for response (mRECIST), were: 3 complete responses, 3 partial responses (PR) and 1 stable disease (SD) and among 5 evaluable liver mets pts: 1 PR, 3 SD and 1 progressive disease (RECIST 1.1). Conclusions: NBTXR3 is well tolerated at the 22% dose level with an overall positive safety profile. This innovative approach might constitute a valuable solution for pts with liver tumors beyond standard treatment lines. NBTXR3 was successful in a phase II/III in soft tissue sarcoma [NCT02379845] and is currently evaluated in head and neck [NCT01946867; NCT02901483], prostate [NCT02805894] and rectum cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT02721056.

Analysis of survival and objective response (OR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a phase III study of lenvatinib (REFLECT)

186

Background: In REFLECT, Lenvatinib (LEN) demonstrated treatment effect on overall survival (OS) by statistical confirmation of noninferiority to sorafenib (SOR). OR rates for LEN versus SOR were: 24% versus 9% by investigator review and 41% versus 12% by independent review (Kudo et al 2018). Since the relationship between OR and OS in phase III HCC studies is unclear, we explored the relationship between OR and OS in REFLECT. Methods: OR assessed by investigators per mRECIST were used to analyze the association between OR and OS of pts treated with LEN or SOR. The median OS of responders (CR or PR) was compared to that of nonresponders (SD, PD, or UNK/NE) irrespective of treatment. Landmark analyses were performed by OR status at several fixed time points as sensitivity analyses, and the effect on OS was evaluated by Cox regression with OR as a time-dependent covariate, with other prognostic factors. Results: Median OS was 22.4 months for responders and 11.4 months for nonresponders. Hazard ratios (HR) of landmark analyses at 2, 4, and 6 months were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.57–0.98), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56–0.92), and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57–0.93). Independent predictors of OS based on unstratified Cox regression are in the table. Conclusions: In REFLECT, OR was an independent predictor of OS in pts with HCC regardless of treatment. The results indicate this correlation is worth further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT01761266. [Table: see text]