1
|
Aridi H, Leon B, Murphy MP, Malas M, Schermerhorn M, Kashyap VS, Wang G, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Gonzalez A, Motaganahalli R. Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay after Elective Carotid Revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)01201-1. [PMID: 38763455 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative day-one discharge is used as a quality-of-care indicator after carotid revascularization. This study identifies predictors of prolonged length of stay (pLOS), defined as a postprocedural LOS of > 1 day, after elective carotid revascularization. METHODS Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and Transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) in the Vascular Quality Initiative between 2016 and 2022 were included in this analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of pLOS, defined as a postprocedural LOS of > 1 day, after each procedure. RESULTS A total of 118,625 elective cases were included. pLOS was observed in nearly 23.2% of patients undergoing carotid revascularization. Major adverse events, including neurological, cardiac, infectious, and bleeding complications, occurred in 5.2% of patients and were the most significant contributor to pLOS after the 3 procedures. Age, female sex, nonwhite race, insurance status, high comorbidity index, prior ipsilateral CEA, non-ambulatory status, symptomatic presentation, surgeries occurring on Friday and postoperative hypo- or hypertension were significantly associated with pLOS across all 3 procedures. For CEA, additional predictors included contralateral carotid artery occlusion, preoperative use of dual antiplatelets and anticoagulation, low physician volume (< 11 cases/year) and drain use. For TCAR, preoperative anticoagulation use, low physician case volume (<6 cases/year), no protamine use, and post-stent dilatation intraoperatively were associated with pLOS. One-year analysis showed a significant association between pLOS and increased mortality for all 3 procedures; CEA (HR,1.64; 95%CI, 1.49-1.82), TCAR (HR,1.56; 95%CI, 1.35-1.80), and TFCAS (HR,1.33; 95%CI,1.08-1.64) (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS A postoperative LOS of more than 1 day is not uncommon after carotid revascularization. Procedure-related complications are the most common drivers of pLOS. Identifying patients are risk for pLOS highlight quality improvement strategies that can optimize short and 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing carotid revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanaa Aridi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Brandon Leon
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Michael P Murphy
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Mahmoud Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Vikram S Kashyap
- Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids MI
| | - Grace Wang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Andrew Gonzalez
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Raghu Motaganahalli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farah M, Moghaddam M, Zarrintan S, Willie-Permor D, Schermerhorn M, Malas M. The Effect of Controlled versus Uncontrolled Hypertension on Outcomes of Carotid Revascularization Procedures. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)01200-X. [PMID: 38763456 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hypertension has been implicated as a strong predictive factor for poorer outcomes in patients undergoing various vascular procedures. However, limited research is available that examines the effect of uncontrolled hypertension on outcomes after carotid revascularization. We aimed to determine which carotid revascularization procedure yields the best outcome in this patient population. METHODS We studied patients undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA), Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting (TFCAS), or Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) from April 2020 to June 2022 using data from Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). Patients were stratified into two groups: those with controlled hypertension (cHTN) and those with uncontrolled hypertension (uHTN). Patients with cHTN were those with HTN treated with medication and a blood pressure <130/80. Patients with uHTN had a blood pressure >130/80. Our primary outcomes were in-hospital stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), and 30-day mortality. Our secondary outcomes were postoperative hypotension/hypertension, reperfusion syndrome, prolonged length of stay (PLOS; >1 day), stroke/death and stroke/death/MI. We used logistic regression models for the multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 34,653 CEA (uHTN= 11,347, 32.7%), 8,199 TFCAS (uHTN=2,307, 28.1%), and 17,309 TCAR (uHTN=4,990, 28.8%) patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in age between cHTN and uHTN patients for each carotid revascularization procedure. However, compared to cHTN, patients with uncontrolled HTN had significantly more comorbidities. Uncontrolled HTN was associated with an increased risk of combined in-hospital stroke/death/MI following CEA (aOR=1.56 [95% CI: 1.30-1.87]; p<0.001), TFCAS (aOR=1.59 [95% CI: 1.21-2.08]; p<0.001) and TCAR (aOR=1.39 [95% CI: 1.12-1.73]; p=0.003) compared to controlled HTN. Additionally, uHTN was associated with PLOS following all carotid revascularization methods. For the sub-analysis of patients with uHTN, TFCAS was associated with an increased risk of stroke (aOR=1.82 [95% CI: 1.39-2.37]; p<0.001), in-hospital death (aOR=3.73 [95% CI: 2.25-6.19]; p<0.001), reperfusion syndrome (aOR=6.24 [95% CI: 3.57-10.93]; p<0.001), and extended LOS (aOR=1.87 [95% CI: 1.51-2.32]; p<0.001) compared to CEA. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of TCAR compared to CEA. CONCLUSION The results from this study show that patients with uncontrolled hypertension are at a higher risk of stroke and death postoperatively compared to patients with controlled hypertension; highlighting the importance of treating HTN before undergoing elective carotid revascularization. Additionally, in patients with uHTN, TFCAS yields the worst outcomes while CEA and TCAR proved to be the safer interventions. Uncontrolled hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid disease treated with CEA or TCAR have better outcomes compared to those treated with TFCAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Farah
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington D.C
| | - Marjan Moghaddam
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Daniel Willie-Permor
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mahmoud Malas
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ratner M, Garg K, Chang H, Nigalaye A, Medvedovsky S, Jacobowitz G, Siracuse JJ, Patel V, Schermerhorn M, DiMaggio C, Rockman CB. Preoperative COVID-19 Vaccination is Associated with Decreased Perioperative Mortality after Major Vascular Surgery. Ann Surg 2024:00000658-990000000-00880. [PMID: 38726660 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the effect of corona virus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination on perioperative outcomes after major vascular surgery. BACKGROUND DATA COVID-19 vaccination is associated with decreased mortality in patients undergoing various surgical procedures. However, the effect of vaccination on perioperative mortality after major vascular surgery is unknown. METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who underwent major vascular surgery between December 2021 through August 2023. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days of index operation or prior to hospital discharge. Multivariable models were used to examine the association between vaccination status and the primary outcome. RESULTS Of the total 85,424 patients included, 19161 (22.4%) were unvaccinated. Unvaccinated patients were younger compared to vaccinated patients (mean age 68.44 +/- 10.37 y vs 72.11 +/- 9.20 y, P <0.001) and less likely to have comorbid conditions, including hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dialysis. After risk factor adjustment, vaccination was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.62 - 0.81, P <0.0001). Stratification by procedure type demonstrated that vaccinated patients had decreased odds of mortality after open AAA (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.42-0.97, P =0.03), EVAR (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.43-0.83, p 0.002), CAS (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, P =0.004) and infra-inguinal lower extremity bypass (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.48-0.96, P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 vaccination is associated with reduced perioperative mortality in patients undergoing vascular surgery. This association is most pronounced for patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair, carotid stenting and infrainguinal bypass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Ratner
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Karan Garg
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Heepeel Chang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
| | - Anjali Nigalaye
- Division of Hospitalist Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Steven Medvedovsky
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Glenn Jacobowitz
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Virendra Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Interventions, Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles DiMaggio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Caron B Rockman
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jones DW, Simons JP, Osborne NH, Schermerhorn M, Dimick JB, Schanzer A. Earned Outcomes Correlate with Reliability-Adjusted Surgical Mortality after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Predict Future Performance. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)01082-6. [PMID: 38697233 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cumulative, probability-based metrics are regularly used to measure quality in professional sports, but these methods have not been applied to health care delivery. These techniques have the potential to be particularly useful in describing surgical quality, where case volume is variable and outcomes tend to be dominated by statistical "noise". The established statistical technique used to adjust for differences in case volume is reliability-adjustment which emphasizes statistical "signal"but has several limitations. We sought to validate a novel measure of surgical quality based on earned outcomes methods (deaths above average, DAA) against reliability-adjusted mortality rates, using abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair outcomes to illustrate the measure's performance. METHODS Earned outcomes methods were used to calculate the outcome of interest for each patient: deaths above average (DAA). Hospital-level DAA were calculated for non-ruptured open AAA repair and EVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database from 2016-2019. DAA for each center is the sum of observed - predicted risk of death for each patient; predicted risk of death was calculated using established multivariable logistic regression modeling. Correlations of DAA with reliability-adjusted mortality rates and procedure volume were determined. Because an accurate quality metric should correlate with future results, outcomes from 2016-2017 were used to categorize hospital quality based on (1) risk-adjusted mortality, (2) risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality, and (3) DAA. The best performing quality metric was determined by comparing the ability of these categories to predict 2018-2019 risk-adjusted outcomes. RESULTS During the study period, 3,734 patients underwent open repair (106 hospitals), and 20,680 patients underwent EVAR (183 hospitals). DAA was closely correlated with reliability-adjusted mortality rates for open repair (r=0.94, P<0.001) and EVAR (r=0.99, P<0.001). DAA also correlated with hospital case volume for open repair (r=-.54, P<0.001), but not EVAR (r=0.07, P=0.3). In 2016-2017, most hospitals had 0% mortality (55% open repair, 57% EVAR), making it impossible to evaluate these hospitals using traditional risk-adjusted mortality rates alone. Further, zero mortality hospitals in 2016-2017 did not demonstrate improved outcomes in 2018-2019 for open repair (3.8% vs 4.6%, P=0.5) or EVAR (0.8% vs 1.0%, P=0.2) compared to all other hospitals. In contrast to traditional risk-adjustment, 2016-2017 DAA evenly divided centers into quality quartiles which predicted 2018-2019 performance with increased mortality rate associated with each decrement in quality quartile (Q1 3.2%, Q2 4.0%, Q3 5.1%, Q4 6.0%). There was a significantly higher risk of mortality at worst quartile open repair hospitals compared to best quartile hospitals (OR 2.01, [95% CI 1.07-3.76], P=0.03). Using 2016-2019 DAA to define quality, highest quality quartile open repair hospitals had lower median DAA compared to lowest quality quartile hospitals (-1.18 DAA vs +1.32 DAA, P<0.001), correlating with lower median reliability-adjusted mortality rates (3.6% vs 5.1%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Adjustment for differences in hospital volume is essential when measuring hospital-level outcomes. Earned outcomes accurately categorize hospital quality and correlate with reliability-adjustment but are easier to calculate and interpret. From 2016-2019, highest quality open AAA repair hospitals prevented >40 perioperative deaths compared to the average hospital, and >80 perioperative deaths compared to lowest quality hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas W Jones
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
| | - Jessica P Simons
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | | | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Justin B Dimick
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elizaga N, Ghosh R, Saldana-Ruiz N, Schermerhorn M, Soden P, Dansey K, Zettervall SL. Carotid endarterectomy and transcarotid artery revascularization can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)01068-1. [PMID: 38649102 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are considered a high-risk population, and the optimal approach to the treatment of carotid disease remains unclear. Thus, we compared outcomes following carotid revascularization for patients with CKD by operative approach of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS), and transcarotid arterial revascularization (TCAR). METHODS The Vascular Quality Initiative was analyzed for patients undergoing carotid revascularizations (CEA, TFCAS, and TCAR) from 2016 to 2021. Patients with normal renal function (estimated glomular filtration rate >90 mL/min/1.72 m2) were excluded. Asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis were assessed separately. Preoperative demographics, operative details, and outcomes of 30-day mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and composite variable of stroke/death were compared. Multivariable analysis adjusted for differences in groups, including CKD stage. RESULTS A total of 90,343 patients with CKD underwent revascularization (CEA, n = 66,870; TCAR, n = 13,459; and TFCAS, n = 10,014; asymptomatic, 63%; symptomatic, 37%). Composite 30-day mortality/stroke rates were: asymptomatic: CEA, 1.4%; TCAR, 1.2%; TFCAS, 1.8%; and symptomatic: CEA, 2.7%; TCAR, 2.3%; TFCAS, 3.7%. In adjusted analysis, TCAR had lower 30-day mortality compared with CEA (asymptomatic: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.7; symptomatic: aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7), and no difference in stroke, MI, or the composite outcome of stroke/death in both symptom cohorts. TCAR had lower risk of other cardiac complications compared with CEA in asymptomatic patients (aOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9) and had similar risk in symptomatic patients. Compared with TFCAS, TCAR patients had lower 30-day mortality (asymptomatic: aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2-0.95; symptomatic: aOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), stroke (symptomatic: aOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.97), and stroke/death (asymptomatic: aOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.97; symptomatic: aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7), but no differences in MI or other cardiac complications. Patients treated with TFCAS had higher 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5) and stroke risk (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.02-1.7) in symptomatic patients compared with CEA. There were no differences in MI or other cardiac complications. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with CKD, TCAR and CEA showed rates of stroke/death less than 2% for asymptomatic patients and less than 3% for symptomatic patients. Given the increased risk of major morbidity and mortality, TFCAS should not be performed in patients with CKD who are otherwise anatomic candidates for TCAR or CEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma Elizaga
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Rahul Ghosh
- Texas A&M University School of Medicine, College Station, TX
| | | | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Kirsten Dansey
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sara L Zettervall
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yunus RA, Saeed S, Levy N, Di Fenza R, Sharkey A, Pobywajlo S, Liang P, Schermerhorn M, Mahmood F, Matyal R, Neves S. A Multidisciplinary Protocolized Approach for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Management: A Retrospective Before-After Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:755-770. [PMID: 38220517 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) management reduces rates of adverse complications. DESIGN A retrospective before-after study. SETTING A tertiary-care academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients who underwent open or endovascular rAAA repair; data were stratified into before-protocol implementation (group 1: 2015-2018) and after-protocol implementation (group 2: 2019-2022) groups. INTERVENTION The protocol details the workflow for vascular surgery, anesthesia, emergency department, and operating room staff for a rAAA case; training was accomplished through yearly workshops. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause morbidity and other major complications. Differences in postoperative complication rates between groups were assessed using Pearson's χ2 test. Of the 77 patients included undergoing rAAA repair, 41 (53.2%) patients were in group 1, and 36 (46.8%) patients were in group 2. Patients in group 2 had a significantly shorter median time to incision (1.0 v 0.7 hours, p = 0.022) and total procedure time (180.0 v 160.5 minutes, p = 0.039) for both endovascular and open repair. After protocol implementation, patients undergoing endovascular repair exhibited significantly lower rates of mortality (46.2% v 20.0%, p = 0.048), all-cause morbidity (65.4% v 44.0%, p = 0.050), and renal complications (15.4% v 0.0%, p = 0.036); patients undergoing open repair for a rAAA exhibited significantly lower rates of mortality (53.3% v 27.3%, p = 0.018) and bowel ischemia (26.7% v 0.0%, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol for the management of a rAAA may reduce rates of adverse complications and improve the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayaan A Yunus
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Shirin Saeed
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Nadav Levy
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Raffaele Di Fenza
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Aidan Sharkey
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Susan Pobywajlo
- The CardioVascular Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Patric Liang
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Feroze Mahmood
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Robina Matyal
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| | - Sara Neves
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reutersberg B, Gleason T, Desai N, Ehrlich M, Evangelista A, Braverman A, Myrmel T, Chen EP, Estrera A, Schermerhorn M, Bossone E, Pai CW, Eagle K, Sundt T, Patel H, Trimarchi S, Eckstein HH. Neurological event rates and associated risk factors in acute type B aortic dissections treated by thoracic aortic endovascular repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 167:52-62.e5. [PMID: 35260280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is the method of choice in patients with complicated type B acute aortic dissection. However, thoracic endovascular aortic repair carries a risk of periprocedural neurological events including stroke and spinal cord ischemia. We aimed to look at procedure-related neurological complications within a large cohort of patients with type B acute aortic dissection treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair. METHODS Between 1996 and 2021, the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection collected data on 3783 patients with type B acute aortic dissection. For this analysis, 648 patients with type B acute aortic dissection treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair were included (69.4% male, mean age 62.7 ± 13.4 years). Patients were excluded who presented with a preexisting neurologic deficit or received adjunctive procedures. Demographics, clinical symptoms, and outcomes were analyzed. The primary end point was the periprocedural incidence of neurological events (defined as stroke, spinal cord ischemia, transient neurological deficit, or coma). Predictors for perioperative neurological events and follow-up outcomes were considered as secondary end points. RESULTS Periprocedure neurological events were noted in 72 patients (11.1%) and included strokes (n = 29, 4.6%), spinal cord ischemias (n = 21, 3.3%), transient neurological deficits (n = 16, 2.6%), or coma (n = 6, 1.0%). The group with neurological events had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (20.8% vs 4.3%, P < .001). Patients with neurological events were more likely to be female (40.3% vs 29.3%, P = .077), and aortic rupture was more often cited as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (38.8% vs 16.5%, P < .001). In patients with neurological events, more stent grafts were used (2 vs 1 stent graft, P = .002). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that aortic rupture (odds ratio, 3.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.44-6.78, P = .004) and female sex (odds ratio, 1.984, 95% confidence interval, 1.031-3.817, P = .040) were significantly associated with perioperative neurological events. CONCLUSIONS In this highly selected group from dedicated aortic centers, more than 1 in 10 patients with type B acute aortic dissection treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair had neurological events, in particular women. Further research is needed to identify the causes and presentation of these events after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, especially among women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Reutersberg
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Gleason
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Nimesh Desai
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Marek Ehrlich
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Alan Braverman
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
| | | | - Edward P Chen
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Anthony Estrera
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Eduardo Bossone
- Department of Cardiology, San Giovanni e Ruggi, Salerno, Italy
| | - Chih-Wen Pai
- Department of Medicine and Department of Cardiac Surgery, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Kim Eagle
- Department of Medicine and Department of Cardiac Surgery, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Thoralf Sundt
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Himanshu Patel
- Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Santi Trimarchi
- Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Hans-Henning Eckstein
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Trimarchi S, Gleason TG, Brinster DR, Bismuth J, Bossone E, Sundt TM, Montgomery DG, Pai CW, Bissacco D, de Beaufort HWL, Bavaria JE, Mussa F, Bekeredjian R, Schermerhorn M, Pacini D, Myrmel T, Ouzounian M, Korach A, Chen EP, Coselli JS, Eagle KA, Patel HJ. Editor's Choice - Trends in Management and Outcomes of Type B Aortic Dissection: A Report From the International Registry of Aortic Dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:775-782. [PMID: 37201718 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute type B aortic dissection in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. METHODS From 1996 - 2022, 3 908 patients were divided into similar sized quartiles (T1, T2, T3, and T4). In hospital outcomes were analysed for each quartile. Survival rates following admission were compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses with Mantel-Cox Log rank tests. RESULTS Endovascular treatment increased from 19.1% in T1 to 37.2% in T4 (ptrend < .001). Correspondingly, medical therapy decreased from 65.7% in T1 to 54.0% in T4 (ptrend < .001), and open surgery from 14.8% in T1 to 7.0% in T4 (ptrend < .001). In hospital mortality decreased in the overall cohort from 10.7% in T1 to 6.1% in T4 (ptrend < .001), as well as in medically, endovascularly and surgically treated patients (ptrend = .017, .033, and .011, respectively). Overall post-admission survival at three years increased (T1: 74.8% vs. T4: 77.3%; p = .006). CONCLUSION Considerable changes in the management of acute type B aortic dissection were observed over time, with a significant increase in the use of endovascular treatment and a corresponding reduction in open surgery and medical management. These changes were associated with a decreased overall in hospital and three year post-admission mortality rate among quartiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santi Trimarchi
- Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Italy.
| | - Tom G Gleason
- Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derek R Brinster
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Northwell Health, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jean Bismuth
- DeBakey Heart & Vascular Centre, Methodist Hospital System, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Bossone
- Department of Public Health, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Thoralf M Sundt
- Thoracic Aortic Centre, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Chih-Wen Pai
- Cardiovascular Centre, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniele Bissacco
- Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Italy
| | | | - Joseph E Bavaria
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Firas Mussa
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Northwell Health, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Davide Pacini
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Truls Myrmel
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tromsø University Hospital, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Maral Ouzounian
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amit Korach
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Edward P Chen
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph S Coselli
- Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kim A Eagle
- Cardiovascular Centre, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- Cardiovascular Centre, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang DS, Shen J, Majdalany BS, Khaja MS, Bhatti S, Ferencik M, Ganguli S, Gunn AJ, Heitner JF, Johri AM, Obara P, Ohle R, Sadeghi MM, Schermerhorn M, Siracuse JJ, Steenburg SD, Sutphin PD, Vijay K, Waite K, Steigner ML. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass, Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: 2023 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S513-S520. [PMID: 38040468 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as abnormal dilation of the infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter to 3.0 cm or greater. The natural history of AAA consists of progressive expansion and potential rupture. Although most AAAs are clinically silent, a pulsatile abdominal mass identified on physical examination may indicate the presence of an AAA. When an AAA is suspected, an imaging study is essential to confirm the diagnosis. This document reviews the relative appropriateness of various imaging procedures for the initial evaluation of suspected AAA. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Wang
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
| | - Jody Shen
- Research Author, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Bill S Majdalany
- Panel Chair, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Minhaj S Khaja
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Salman Bhatti
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
| | - Maros Ferencik
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
| | - Suvranu Ganguli
- Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew J Gunn
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - John F Heitner
- New York University Langone Health, New York, New York; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
| | - Amer M Johri
- Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; American Society of Echocardiography
| | - Piotr Obara
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Robert Ohle
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | - Mehran M Sadeghi
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Society for Vascular Surgery
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Boston Medical Centers, Boston University, and Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Society for Vascular Surgery
| | - Scott D Steenburg
- Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | | | - Kanupriya Vijay
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kathleen Waite
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, Primary care physician
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dakour-Aridi H, Vyas PK, Schermerhorn M, Malas M, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Cronenwett J, Wang G, Kashyap VS, Motaganahalli RL. Regional variation in patient selection, practice patterns, and outcomes based on techniques for carotid artery revascularization in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:687-694.e2. [PMID: 37224893 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Significant regional variation is known with multiple surgical procedures. This study describes regional variation in carotid revascularization within the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). METHODS Data from the VQI carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) databases from 2016 to 2021 were used. Nineteen geographic VQI regions were divided into three tertiles based on the average annual volume of carotid procedures performed per region (low-volume: 956 cases [range, 144-1382]; medium-volume: 1533 cases [range, 1432-1589]; and high-volume: 1845 cases [range, 1642-2059]). Patients' characteristics, indications for carotid revascularization, practice patterns, and outcomes (perioperative and 1-year stroke/death) of different revascularization techniques were compared between these regional groups. Regression models that adjust for known risk factors and allow for random effects at the center level were used. RESULTS CEA was the most common revascularization procedure (>60%) across all regional groups. Significant regional variation was observed in the practice of CEA such as variability in the use of shunting, drain placement, stump pressure and electroencephalogram monitoring, intraoperative protamine, and patch angioplasty. For transfemoral CAS, high-volume regions had a higher proportion of asymptomatic patients with <80% stenosis (30.5% vs 27.8%) in addition to higher use of local/regional anesthesia (80.4% vs 76.2%), protamine (16.1% vs 11.8%), and completion angiography (81.6% vs 77.6%) during transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS) compared with low-volume regions. For transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), high-volume regions were less likely to intervene on asymptomatic patients with <80% stenosis (32.2% vs 35.8%) than low-volume regions. They also had a higher proportion of urgent/emergent procedures (13.6% vs 10.4%) and were more likely to use general anesthesia (92.0% vs 82.1%), completion angiography (67.3% vs 63.0%), and poststent ballooning (48.4% vs 36.8%). For each carotid revascularization technique, no significant differences were noted in perioperative and 1-year outcomes between low-, medium-, and high-volume regions. Finally, there were no significant differences in outcomes between TCAR and CEA across the different regional groups. In all regional groups, TCAR was associated with a 40% reduction in perioperative and 1-year stroke/death compared with TF-CAS. CONCLUSIONS Despite significant variation in clinical practices for the management of carotid disease, no regional variation exists in the overall outcomes of carotid interventions. TCAR and CEA continue to show superior outcomes to TF-CAS across all VQI regional groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanaa Dakour-Aridi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Punit K Vyas
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mahmoud Malas
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Jack Cronenwett
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Care Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Grace Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Vikram S Kashyap
- Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Raghu L Motaganahalli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Krawisz AK, Raja A, Jones WS, Schneider P, Shen C, Schermerhorn M, Secemsky EA. Long-term outcomes of peripheral atherectomy for femoropopliteal endovascular interventions. EUROINTERVENTION 2023; 18:e1378-e1387. [PMID: 36373386 PMCID: PMC10078823 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-22-00609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of atherectomy during peripheral endovascular interventions (PVI) has increased dramatically, but data regarding its safety and effectiveness are lacking. Aims: This study sought to determine the long-term safety of atherectomy in contemporary practice. Methods: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who underwent femoropopliteal artery PVI from 2015-2018 were identified in a 100% sample of inpatient, outpatient, and carrier file data using procedural claims codes. The primary exposure was the use of atherectomy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for measured differences in patient populations. Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare outcomes. Results: Among 168,553 patients who underwent PVI, 59,142 (35.1%) underwent atherectomy. The mean patient age was 77.0±7.6 years, 44.9% were female, 81.9% were white, and 46.7% had chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. Over a median follow-up time of 993 days (interquartile range 319-1,377 days), atherectomy use was associated with no difference in the risk of either the composite endpoint of death and amputation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.01; p=0.19) or of major adverse limb events (aHR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05; p=0.26). Patients who underwent atherectomy had a modest reduction in the risk of subsequently undergoing amputation or surgical revascularisation (aHR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.90-0.94; p<0.01) but an increase in the risk of undergoing a subsequent PVI (aHR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.16-1.21; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The use of atherectomy during femoropopliteal artery PVI was not associated with an increase in the risk of long-term adverse safety outcomes among patients with peripheral artery disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Krawisz
- Department of Medicine, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aishwarya Raja
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - W Schuyler Jones
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter Schneider
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Changyu Shen
- Department of Medicine, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric A Secemsky
- Department of Medicine, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zarrintan S, Yei KS, Moacdieh MP, Schermerhorn M, Clouse WD, Malas MB. Preoperative Spinal Drain Placement is Associated with Reduced Risk of Spinal Cord Ischemia in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aortic Dissection. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 90:17-26. [PMID: 36442708 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a rare but serious complication of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR). Several measures including spinal drain (SD) placement have been proposed to reduce the risk of SCI in TEVARs performed for aneurysms. However, there are no specific large-scale data on potential benefits of SD placement in Stanford Type B aortic dissection (TBAD). We aimed to assess the impact of preoperative SD placement on preventing SCI during TEVARs performed for TBAD. METHODS We included all TEVAR cases performed for TBAD in Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) from 2012 to 2021. Patients with connective tissue disease, open conversion, rupture, proximal disease > zone 5, proximal landing zone <2 or SCI on presentation were excluded. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance patients on 34 dimensions by the nearest neighbor principle to compare patients based on preoperative SD placement. The primary outcome was SCI. Secondary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality, perioperative complications, and 90-day2intervention. RESULTS A total of 2,683 TEVARs were performed for TBAD with 1,227 (45.7%) undergoing preoperative SD placement. Propensity matching produced 672 well-matched pairs. In the matched cohort, SD placement was not associated with significant reduction in temporary SCI (3.0% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.45). However, SD placement was associated with significant reduction of the risk of permanent SCI at discharge (1.3% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.012). SD was also associated with lower risk of 30-day mortality (3.7% vs 6.4%, P = 0.025) and shorter length of stay but not 90-day mortality or 90-day reintervention. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that preoperative SD placement in patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD is beneficial in reducing the risk of permanent SCI without increasing risks of perioperative complications. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Zarrintan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Kevin S Yei
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Munir P Moacdieh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - W Darrin Clouse
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Naylor R, Rantner B, Ancetti S, de Borst GJ, De Carlo M, Halliday A, Kakkos SK, Markus HS, McCabe DJH, Sillesen H, van den Berg JC, Vega de Ceniga M, Venermo MA, Vermassen FEG, Esvs Guidelines Committee, Antoniou GA, Bastos Goncalves F, Bjorck M, Chakfe N, Coscas R, Dias NV, Dick F, Hinchliffe RJ, Kolh P, Koncar IB, Lindholt JS, Mees BME, Resch TA, Trimarchi S, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Wanhainen A, Document Reviewers, Bellmunt-Montoya S, Bulbulia R, Darling RC, Eckstein HH, Giannoukas A, Koelemay MJW, Lindström D, Schermerhorn M, Stone DH. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:7-111. [PMID: 35598721 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 166.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
14
|
Goodney P, Mao J, Columbo J, Suckow B, Schermerhorn M, Malas M, Brooke B, Hoel A, Scali S, Arya S, Spangler E, Alabi O, Beck A, Gladders B, Moore K, Zheng X, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Sedrakyan A. Use of linked registry claims data for long term surveillance of devices after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: observational surveillance study. BMJ 2022; 379:e071452. [PMID: 36283705 PMCID: PMC9593227 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate long term outcomes (reintervention and late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm) of aortic endografts in real world practice using linked registry claims data. DESIGN Observational surveillance study. SETTING 282 centers in the Vascular Quality Initiative Registry linked to United States Medicare claims (2003-18). PARTICIPANTS 20 489 patients treated with four device types used for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): 40.6% (n=8310) received the Excluder (Gore), 32.2% (n=6606) the Endurant (Medtronic), 16.0% (n=3281) the Zenith (Cook Medical), and 11.2% (n=2292) the AFX (Endologix). Given modifications to AFX in late 2014, patients who received the AFX device were categorized into two groups: the early AFX group (n=942) and late AFX group (n=1350) and compared with patients who received the other devices, using propensity matched Cox models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Reintervention and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm post-EVAR; all patients (100%) had complete follow-up via the registry or claims based outcome assessment, or both. RESULTS Median age was 76 years (interquartile range (IQR) 70-82 years), 80.0% (16 386/20 489) of patients were men, and median follow-up was 2.3 years (IQR 0.9-4.1 years). Crude five year reintervention rates were significantly higher for patients who received the early AFX device compared with the other devices: 14.9% (95% confidence interval 13.7% to 16.2%) for Excluder, 19.5% (18.1% to 21.1%) for Endurant, 16.7% (15.0% to 18.6%) for Zenith, and early 27.0% (23.7% to 30.6%) for the early AFX. The risk of reintervention for patients who received the early AFX device was higher compared with the other devices in propensity matched Cox models (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.02) and analyses using a surgeon level instrumental variable of >33% AFX grafts used in their practice (1.75, 1.19 to 2.59). The linked registry claims surveillance data identified the increased risk of reintervention with the early AFX device as early as mid-2013, well before the first regulatory warnings were issued in the US in 2017. CONCLUSIONS The linked registry claims surveillance data identified a device specific risk in long term reintervention after EVAR of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Device manufacturers and regulators can leverage linked data sources to actively monitor long term outcomes in real world practice after cardiovascular interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jialin Mao
- Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse Columbo
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Bjoern Suckow
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Emily Spangler
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Olamide Alabi
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adam Beck
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Kayla Moore
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Xinyan Zheng
- Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Art Sedrakyan
- Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aridi HD, Vyas P, Schermerhorn M, Malas M, Kayshap V, Motaganahalli R. Regional Variation In Patient Selection, Practice Patterns And Outcomes Based On Techniques For Carotid Artery Revascularization In The Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
16
|
Patel P, Marcaccio C, Isbell K, Liang P, Young E, Wang G, Motanganahalli R, Malas M, Nolan B, Kashyap V, Schermerhorn M. Among Female Patients, In-Hospital Outcomes after Carotid Endarterectomy, Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, and Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting Vary by Preoperative Symptom Status. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
17
|
Jones DW, Simons JP, Lipsitz S, Schermerhorn M, Schanzer A. Novel Surgical Quality Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
18
|
Patel P, Marcaccio C, O'Donnell T, Elmously A, Garg K, Schermerhorn M, Takayama H, Patel V. Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Sac Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Affects Late Outcomes After Repair. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
19
|
Rao A, Patel P, Mehta A, Bajakian D, Morrissey N, Iannuzzi J, Garg K, Schermerhorn M, Siracuse J, Takayama H, Patel V. The Impact of Large-Bore Access Complications on Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
20
|
Secemsky EA, Song Y, Schermerhorn M, Yeh RW. Update from the Longitudinal Assessment of Safety of Femoropopliteal Endovascular Treatment With Paclitaxel-Coated Devices Among Medicare Beneficiaries: The SAFE-PAD Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15:e012074. [PMID: 35593638 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.122.012074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Secemsky
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (E.A.S., Y.S., R.W.Y.).,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., M.S., R.W.Y.).,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (E.A.S., R.W.Y.)
| | - Yang Song
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (E.A.S., Y.S., R.W.Y.).,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., M.S., R.W.Y.)
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (M.S.)
| | - Robert W Yeh
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (E.A.S., Y.S., R.W.Y.).,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., M.S., R.W.Y.).,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (E.A.S., R.W.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Janko MR, Hubbard G, Back M, Shah SK, Pomozi E, Szeberin Z, DeMartino R, Wang LJ, Crofts S, Belkin M, Davila VJ, Lemmon GW, Wang SK, Czerny M, Kreibich M, Humphries MD, Shutze W, Joh JH, Cho S, Behrendt CA, Setacci C, Hacker RI, Sobreira ML, Yoshida WB, D'Oria M, Lepidi S, Chiesa R, Kahlberg A, Go MR, Rizzo AN, Black JH, Magee GA, Elsayed R, Baril DT, Beck AW, McFarland GE, Gavali H, Wanhainen A, Kashyap VS, Stoecker JB, Wang GJ, Zhou W, Fujimura N, Obara H, Wishy AM, Bose S, Smeds M, Liang P, Schermerhorn M, Conrad MF, Hsu JH, Patel R, Lee JT, Liapis CD, Moulakakis KG, Farber MA, Motta F, Ricco JB, Bath J, Coselli JS, Aziz F, Coleman DM, Davis FM, Fatima J, Irshad A, Shalhub S, Kakkos S, Zhang Q, Lawrence PF, Woo K, Chung J. In-situ Bypass Is Associated with Superior Infection-free Survival Compared to Extra-Anatomic Bypass for the Management of Secondary Aortic Graft Infections Without Enteric Involvement. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:546-555.e3. [PMID: 35470015 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The optimal revascularization modality following complete resection of aortic graft infection (AGI) without enteric involvement remains unclear. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the revascularization approach associated with the lowest morbidity and mortality using real-world data in patients undergoing complete excision of AGI. METHODS A retrospective, multi-institutional study of AGI from 2002-2014 was performed using a standardized database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative variables were recorded. The primary outcome was infection-free survival. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS 241 patients at 34 institutions from 7 countries presented with AGI during the study period (median age 68 years; 75% male). The initial aortic procedures that resulted in AGI were 172 surgical grafts (71%) and 66 endografts (27%) and 3 unknown (2%). 172 (71%) of the patients underwent complete excision of infected aortic graft material followed by in situ (in-line) bypass (ISB), including antibiotic-treated prosthetic graft (35%), autogenous femoral vein (NAIS) (24%), and cryopreserved allograft (41%). 69 patients (29%) underwent extra-anatomic bypass (EAB). Overall median Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated survival was 5.8 years. Perioperative mortality was 16%. When stratified by ISB versus EAB, there was a significant difference in KM estimated infection-free survival (2910 days, IQR 391, 3771 versus 180 days, IQR 27, 3750 days; p<0.001). There were otherwise no significant differences in presentation, comorbidities, nor perioperative variables. Multivariable Cox regression showed lower infection-free survival among patients with EAB (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.6; p<0.001), polymicrobial infection (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.5; p=0.001), MRSA infection (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.7; p=0.02), as well as the protective effect of omental/muscle flap coverage (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.92; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS After complete resection of AGI, perioperative mortality is 16% and median overall survival is 5.8 years. EAB is associated with nearly a two-and-half fold higher re-infection/mortality compared to ISB. Omental and/or muscle flap coverage of the repair appear protective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R Janko
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Grant Hubbard
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Martin Back
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Samir K Shah
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Eniko Pomozi
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zoltan Szeberin
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Randall DeMartino
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Linda J Wang
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sarah Crofts
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Belkin
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Victor J Davila
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Gary W Lemmon
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Shihuan K Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Martin Czerny
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Kreibich
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Misty D Humphries
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - William Shutze
- Texas Vascular Associates, The Heart Hospital Plano, Plano, TX
| | - Jin Hyun Joh
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sungsin Cho
- GermanVasc Research Group, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- GermanVasc Research Group, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlo Setacci
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Siena, Sienna, Italy
| | - Robert I Hacker
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Surgical Arts of St. Louis, Bridgeton, MO
| | - Marcone Lima Sobreira
- Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Botucatu School of Medicine, Paulista State University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Winston Bonetti Yoshida
- Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Botucatu School of Medicine, Paulista State University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mario D'Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Department of Vascular Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Kahlberg
- Department of Vascular Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael R Go
- Division of Vascular Diseases and Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Anthony N Rizzo
- Division of Vascular Diseases and Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - James H Black
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Gregory A Magee
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ramsey Elsayed
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Donald T Baril
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Graeme E McFarland
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Hamid Gavali
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Vikram S Kashyap
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jordan B Stoecker
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Grace J Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Wei Zhou
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Naoki Fujimura
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideaki Obara
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Andrew M Wishy
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Saideep Bose
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO
| | - Matthew Smeds
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO
| | - Patric Liang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mark F Conrad
- Division of Vascular Surgery, St Elizabeth's Hospital, Brighton, MA
| | - Jeffrey H Hsu
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, CA
| | - Rhusheet Patel
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jason T Lee
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Christos D Liapis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos G Moulakakis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Fernando Motta
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jean-Baptiste Ricco
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Poitiers Medical School, Poitiers, France
| | - Jonathan Bath
- Cardiovascular Surgical Clinics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
| | - Joseph S Coselli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Penn State Health Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey, PA
| | - Faisal Aziz
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Dawn M Coleman
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Frank M Davis
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Javairiah Fatima
- Cardiovascular Center at Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Ali Irshad
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Sherene Shalhub
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Stavros Kakkos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Qianzi Zhang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Peter F Lawrence
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Karen Woo
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jayer Chung
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Harris KM, Westenfield KM, Parikh N, Gleason TG, Schermerhorn M, Ouzounian M, Evangelista A, Coselli JS, Pai CW, Ehrlich M, Kaiser CA, Tolva V, Di Eusanio M, Sultan I, Eagle KA, Patel HJ. IATROGENIC AORTIC DISSECTION: EXPANDED INSIGHTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRY OF ACUTE AORTIC DISSECTION. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(22)02759-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
23
|
Mehta A, O'Donnell TFX, Schutzer R, Trestman E, Garg K, Mohebali J, Siracuse JJ, Schermerhorn M, Clouse WD, Patel VI. Evaluating Proximal Clamp Site and Intraoperative Ischemia Time Among Open Repair of Juxtarenal Aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:411-418. [PMID: 35149161 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The proportion of open aneurysm repairs requiring at least a suprarenal clamp has increased in the past few decades, partly due to preferred endovascular approaches for most patients with infrarenal aneurysms, suggesting that the management of aortic clamp placement has become even more relevant. This study evaluated the association between proximal clamp site and intraoperative ischemia times with postoperative renal dysfunction and mortality. METHODS We used the Vascular Quality Initiative to identify all patients undergoing open repairs of elective or symptomatic juxtarenal AAAs from 2004-2018 and compared outcomes by clamp site: above one renal artery, above both renal arteries (supra-renal), or above the celiac trunk (supra-celiac). Outcomes evaluated included acute kidney injury (AKI), new-onset renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), 30-day mortality, and one-year mortality. We used multilevel logistic regressions and cox-proportional hazards models, clustered at the hospital level, to adjust for confounding. RESULTS We identified 3976 patients (median age 71 years, 70% male, 8.2% non-Caucasian), with a median aneurysm diameter of 5.9cm (IQR 5.4-6.8cm). Proximal clamp sites were: above one renal artery (31%), supra-renal (52%), and supra-celiac (17%). Rates of unadjusted outcomes were 20.5% for AKI, 4.1% for new-onset RRT, 4.9% for 30-day mortality, and 8.3% for one-year mortality. On adjusted analyses, independent of ischemia time, supra-renal clamping relative to clamping above a single renal artery had higher odds of postoperative AKI (aOR 1.50 [95%-CI 1.28-1.75]) but similar odds for new-onset RRT (aOR 1.27 [0.79-2.06]) and 30-day mortality (aOR 1.12 [0.79-1.58]) and hazards for one-year mortality (aHR 1.12 [0.86-1.45]). However, every ten minutes of prolonged intraoperative ischemia time was associated with an increase in odds or hazards ratio of postoperative AKI by +7% (IQR 3-11%), new-onset RRT by +11% (IQR 4-17%), 30-day mortality by +11% (IQR 6-17%), and one-year mortality by +7% (IQR 2-13%). Patients with greater than 40 minutes of ischemia time had notably higher rates of all four outcomes. DISCUSSION Supra-renal clamping relative to clamping above a single renal artery was associated with AKI but not new-onset RRT or 30-day mortality. However, intraoperative renal ischemia time was independently associated with all four postoperative outcomes. While further studies are warranted, our findings suggest that an expeditious proximal anastomosis creation is more important than trying to maintain clamp position below one renal artery, suggesting that suprarenal clamping may be the best strategy for open AAA repair when needed to efficiently perform the proximal anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambar Mehta
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center/Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Thomas F X O'Donnell
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Richard Schutzer
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center/Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Eric Trestman
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center/Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Karan Garg
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jahan Mohebali
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - William D Clouse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center/Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Poorthuis M, Herings R, Dansey K, Damen J, Greving J, Schermerhorn M, de Borst G. External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
25
|
Zimetbaum P, Carroll BJ, Locke AH, Secemsky E, Schermerhorn M. Lead-Related Venous Obstruction in Patients With Implanted Cardiac Devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:299-308. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
26
|
Butala NM, Raja A, Xu J, Strom JB, Schermerhorn M, Beckman JA, Shishehbor MH, Shen C, Yeh RW, Secemsky EA. Association of Frailty With Treatment Selection and Long-Term Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e023138. [PMID: 34913364 PMCID: PMC9075246 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.023138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background The optimal treatment strategy for patients with chronic limb‐threatening ischemia (CLTI) is often unclear. Frailty has emerged as an important factor that can identify patients at greater risk of poor outcomes and guide treatment selection, but few studies have explored its utility among the CLTI population. We examine the association of a health record‐based frailty measure with treatment choice and long‐term outcomes among patients hospitalized with CLTI. Methods and Results We included patients aged >65 years hospitalized with CLTI in the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review data set between October 1, 2009 and September 30, 2015. The primary exposure was frailty, defined by the Claims‐based Frailty Indicator. Baseline frailty status and revascularization choice were examined using logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the association between frailty and death or amputation, stratifying by treatment strategy. Of 85 060 patients, 35 484 (42%) were classified as frail. Frail patients had lower likelihood of revascularization (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75‒0.82). Among those revascularized, frailty was associated with lower likelihood of surgical versus endovascular treatment (adjusted OR, 0.76; CI, 0.72‒0.81). Frail patients experienced increased risk of amputation or death, regardless of revascularization status (revascularized: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; CI, 1.30‒1.38; non‐revascularized: adjusted HR, 1.22; CI, 1.17‒1.27). Among those revascularized, frailty was independently associated with amputation or death irrespective of revascularization strategy (surgical: adjusted HR, 1.36; CI, 1.31‒1.42; endovascular: aHR, 1.29; CI, 1.243‒1.35). Conclusions Among patients hospitalized with CLTI, frailty is an important independent predictor of revascularization strategy and longitudinal adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel M Butala
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA.,Cardiology Division Department of Medicine Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical School Boston MA
| | - Aishwarya Raja
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA.,Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York City NY
| | - Jiaman Xu
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA
| | - Jordan B Strom
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Department of Surgery Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA
| | - Joshua A Beckman
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN
| | - Mehdi H Shishehbor
- Harrington Heart and Vascular InstituteCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland OH
| | | | - Robert W Yeh
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA
| | - Eric A Secemsky
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
de Guerre L, Dansey K, Li C, Lu J, van Herwaarden J, Jones D, Goodney P, Schermerhorn M. Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms is Associated With Higher Late Re-Intervention, Rupture, and Mortality Rates. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
28
|
Rao A, Mehta A, Lazar AN, Siracuse J, Garg K, Schermerhorn M, Takayama H, Patel VI. The Association Between Preoperative Independent Ambulatory Status and Outcomes After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repairs. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 81:70-78. [PMID: 34785339 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.10.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Preoperative functional status is appreciated as a key determinant of decision-making when evaluating patients for complex elective surgeries. We used the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) to analyze the effect of being able to independently ambulate on outcomes after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs. METHODS We identified all patients who underwent elective or urgent open AAA repairs from January 2013 to August 2019 in the VQI registry. We recorded demographic variables, comorbidities, and operative factors such as approach, operative ischemia time, proximal clamp site, and presence of iliac aneurysms. Short-term and long-term outcomes included 30-day mortality, any perioperative complications, failure to rescue (defined as death after a complication), and one-year all-cause mortality. We dichotomized patients based on their ability to independently ambulate (Ambulatory) or inability to ambulate independently (Non-Ambulatory) and used both multivariable logistic regressions and cox-proportional hazards models to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS Of 5,371 patients, 328 (6.1%) could not ambulate independently and were more likely to be older (median age 69 vs 72), female (25% vs. 38%), and have greater comorbidities. Overall outcomes were: 4.3% for 30-day mortality, 38.7% for complications, 10.2% for failure-to-rescue, and 6.9% for one-year mortality. Univariate analysis showed higher rates of all adverse outcomes in non-ambulatory patients. On adjusted analysis, non-ambulatory patients had increased odds of complications by 46% (OR 1.46 [95%-CI 1.11-1.91]) and one-year mortality by 46% (HR 1.46 [95%-CI 1.06-1.99]), but not failure to rescue (OR 1.05 [95%-CI 0.67-1.62]) or 30-day mortality (OR 1.22 [95%-CI 0.82-1.81]). Increased hospital volume, age, and increased operative renal ischemia time were independently associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Non-ambulatory status was observed in a small percentage of patients undergoing open AAA repair but was associated with higher rates of post-operative complications and one-year mortality. Ambulatory capacity is one of the key determinants of outcomes following open AAA repair. In patients with poor ambulatory function, a conservative approach is highly recommended over invasive open surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Rao
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032 (USA)
| | - Ambar Mehta
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032 (USA)
| | - Andrew N Lazar
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032 (USA).
| | - Jeffrey Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, 732 Harrison Avenue, 3(rd) Floor, Boston, MA, 02118 (USA)
| | - Karan Garg
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University, 530 1(st) Avenue, 11(th) Floor, New York, NY, 10016 (USA)
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street, STE 5B, Boston, MA, 02215 (USA)
| | - Hiroo Takayama
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032 (USA)
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032 (USA)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Butala N, Raja A, Xu J, Strom J, Schermerhorn M, Beckman J, Shishehbor M, Yeh R, Secemsky E. TCT-299 Association of Frailty With Treatment Selection and Long-Term Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
30
|
Secemsky EA, Shen C, Schermerhorn M, Yeh RW. Longitudinal Assessment of Safety of Femoropopliteal Endovascular Treatment With Paclitaxel-Coated Devices Among Medicare Beneficiaries: The SAFE-PAD Study. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181:1071-1080. [PMID: 33993204 PMCID: PMC8126993 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Paclitaxel-coated peripheral devices have been associated with increased mortality, yet this harm signal has not been replicated outside of meta-analyses of small trials. OBJECTIVE To provide a longitudinal assessment of the safety of femoropopliteal endovascular treatment with peripheral drug-coated devices (DCDs) among Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS SAFE-PAD (Safety Assessment of Femoropopliteal Endovascular Treatment With Paclitaxel-Coated Devices) was a retrospective cohort study designed with the US Food and Drug Administration to evaluate the noninferiority of mortality between DCDs and non-drug-coated devices (NDCDs) for femoropopliteal revascularization performed in 2978 inpatient and outpatient facilities in the US from April 1, 2015, through December 31, 2018. Evaluation of the primary outcome was assessed through May 31, 2020. Participants were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 66 years and older with 1 or more years of enrollment prior to femoropopliteal revascularization. Prespecified subgroups included low-risk cohorts, procedure location, disease severity, and device type. Inverse probability weighting was used to account for imbalances of observed characteristics. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the potential influence of unmeasured confounding. EXPOSURES Treatment with DCDs vs NDCDs as determined by claims codes during the index procedure. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included repeated hospitalization, repeated lower extremity revascularization, and lower extremity amputation. Falsification end points were acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia. RESULTS Of 168 553 patients, 70 584 (41.9%) were treated with a DCD. The mean (SD) age was 77.0 (7.6) years, 75 744 (44.9%) were female, 136 916 of 167 197 (81.9%) were White individuals, 85 880 of 168 553 (51.0%) had diabetes, 82 554 of 168 553 (49.0%) used tobacco, 78 665 of 168 553 (45.7%) had critical limb ischemia (CLI), and 13 296 of 168 553 (7.9%) had a prior amputation. Median follow-up was 2.72 years (interquartile range, 0.87-3.77; longest, 5.16 years). After weighting, the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 53.8% with DCDs and 55.1% with NDCDs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97; noninferiority P < .001). Cox regression and instrumental variable analyses were consistent with the primary findings. No harm associated with DCDs was observed among subgroups, including those treated with stents (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00) or balloons (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96), with or without CLI (CLI: HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97; non-CLI: HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99), and those within the lowest quartile of total comorbidities (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this initial report from the SAFE-PAD cohort study, DCDs were found to be noninferior to NCDCs in respect to mortality through a median follow-up of 2.72 years. This finding remained robust in sensitivity analyses and was consistent across prespecified subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Secemsky
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Changyu Shen
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert W Yeh
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mufarrih SH, Qureshi NQ, Schaefer MS, Sharkey A, Fatima H, Chaudhary O, Krumm S, Baribeau V, Mahmood F, Schermerhorn M, Matyal R. Regional Anaesthesia for Lower Extremity Amputation is Associated with Reduced Post-operative Complications Compared with General Anaesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 62:476-484. [PMID: 34303598 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Primary and secondary lower extremity amputation, performed for patients with lower extremity arterial disease, is associated with increased post-operative morbidity. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of regional anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on post-operative pulmonary complications. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 45 492 patients undergoing lower extremity amputation between 2005 and 2018 was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Safety Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to assess differences in primary outcome of post-operative pulmonary complications (pneumonia or respiratory failure requiring re-intubation) within 48 hours and 30 days after surgery between patients receiving regional (RA) or general anaesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes included post-operative blood transfusion, septic shock, re-operation, and post-operative death within 30 days. RESULTS Of 45 492 patients, 40 026 (88.0%) received GA and 5 466 (12.0%) RA. Patients who received GA had higher odds of developing pulmonary complications at 48 hours (2.1% vs. 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 - 1.78; p = .007) and within 30 days (6.3% vs. 5.9%; aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.78; p = .039). The odds of blood transfusions (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.21; p = .017), septic shock (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.60; p = .025) and re-operation (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.53; p = .023) were also higher for patients who received GA vs. patients who received RA. No difference in mortality rate was observed between patients who received GA and those who received RA (5.7% vs. 7.1%; odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.07). CONCLUSION A statistically significant reduction in pulmonary complications was observed in patients who received RA for lower extremity amputation compared with GA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Hamza Mufarrih
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nada Qaisar Qureshi
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anaesthesiology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Aidan Sharkey
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Huma Fatima
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Omar Chaudhary
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Santiago Krumm
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vincent Baribeau
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Feroze Mahmood
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA
| | - Robina Matyal
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Boyle JR, Mao J, Beck AW, Venermo M, Sedrakyan A, Behrendt CA, Szeberin Z, Eldrup N, Schermerhorn M, Beiles B, Thomson I, Cassar K, Altreuther M, Debus S, Johal AS, Waton S, Scali ST, Cromwell DA, Mani K. Editor's Choice - Variation in Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Outcomes by Country: Analysis of International Consortium of Vascular Registries 2010 - 2016. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 62:16-24. [PMID: 34144883 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Outcomes for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair vary over time and by healthcare system, country, and surgeon. The aim of this study was to analyse peri-operative mortality for intact AAA repair in 11 countries over time and compare outcomes by gender, age, and geographical location. METHODS Prospective data on primary repair of intact AAA were collected from 11 countries through the International Consortium of Vascular Registries (ICVR) and analysed for two time periods, 2010 - 2013 and 2014 - 2016. The primary outcome was peri-operative mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS A total of 103 715 patients were included. The percentage of patients undergoing EVAR increased from 63.6% to 71.2% (p < .001) over the study period. This proportion varied by country from 35% in Hungary to 81% in the United States. Overall peri-operative mortality decreased from 2.1% to 1.6 % (p < .001). Mortality also declined significantly over time for both OSR 4.2% to 3.6 % (p = .002) and EVAR 1.0% to 0.7% (p = .002). Mortality was significantly higher for female than male patients (3.0% vs. 1.6% p < .001). The percentage of patients > 80 years old undergoing AAA repair remained constant at 23.6% (p = .91). Peri-operative mortality was higher for patients > 80 years than for those < 80 years old (2.7% vs. 1.6% p < .001). Forty-six per cent (n = 275) of all EVAR deaths occurred in the over 80s. CONCLUSION The proportion of AAA repairs performed using EVAR has increased over time. Peri-operative mortality continues to decline for both OSR and EVAR. Outcomes however were significantly worse for both women and those aged over 80, so efforts should be focused on these patient groups to further reduce elective AAA mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan R Boyle
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust & Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Jialin Mao
- Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Maarit Venermo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Art Sedrakyan
- Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Working Group GermanVasc, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zoltan Szeberin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nikolaj Eldrup
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Barry Beiles
- Australasian Vascular Audit, Australasian Society for Vascular Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ian Thomson
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Kevin Cassar
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Malta
| | - Martin Altreuther
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sebastian Debus
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Working Group GermanVasc, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amundeep S Johal
- The Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Waton
- The Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, United Kingdom
| | - Salvatore T Scali
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Division of Vascular Surgery & Endovascular Therapy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - David A Cromwell
- The Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Scali S, Beck A, Sedrakyan A, Mao J, Behrendt CA, Boyle J, Venermo M, Faizer R, Schermerhorn M, Beiles B, Szeberin Z, Eldrup N, Thomson I, Cassar K, Altreuther M, Debus S, Johal A, Bjorck M, Cronenwett J, Mani K. Optimal Threshold for the Volume–Outcome Relationship After Open AAA Repair in the Endovascular Era: Analysis of the International Consortium of Vascular Registries. J Vasc Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
34
|
Mehta A, Patel PB, Bajakian D, Schutzer R, Morrissey N, Malas M, Schermerhorn M, Patel VI. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Carotid Endarterectomy and Transfemoral Stenting in Octogenarians. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74:1602-1608. [PMID: 34082003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) has higher combined stroke and death rates in elderly patients with carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) may have similar outcomes to CEA. This study compared outcomes after TCARs relative to those after CEAs and TFCAS, focusing on elderly patients. METHODS We included all patients with carotid artery stenosis, and no prior endarterectomy or stenting, who underwent either a CEA, TFCAS, or TCAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative from September 2016 (TCAR commercially available) to December 2019. We categorized patients into age decades: 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80-90 years. Outcomes included 30-day and one-year composite rates of stroke or death. Cox-proportional hazards models evaluated both outcomes after adjusting for patient demographics, clinical factors, symptomatology, hospital CEA volume, and clustering. RESULTS We identified 33,115 patients who underwent either a CEA, TFCAS, or TCAR for carotid artery stenosis (35% in their 60s, 44% in their 70s, and 21% in their 80s), where half (50%) were symptomatic. The majority of patients had CEAs (80%), followed by TFCAS (11%) and then TCARs (9.1%). The overall rate of 30-day stroke/death was 1.5% and of one-year stroke/death was 4.4%. Octogenarians had the highest 30-day and one-year stroke/death rates relative to their peers (2.3% and 6.3%, respectively). Among all patients, the adjusted hazards of TCARs relative to CEAs was similar for 30-day stroke/death (HR 1.10 [95%-CI 0.75-1.62]) and slightly higher for one-year stroke/death (HR 1.34 [1.02-1.76]). Among octogenarians, however, the adjusted hazards of TCARs relative to CEAs was similar for both 30-day stroke/death (HR 1.12 [0.59-2.13]) and one-year stroke/death (HR 1.28 [0.85-1.94]). TFCAS relative to CEAs had higher hazards of both 30-day stroke/death (HR 1.78 [1.10-2.89]) and one-year stroke/death (HR 1.85 [1.35-2.54]) in octogenarians. CONCLUSIONS TCARs had similar outcomes relative to CEAs among octogenarians with respect to 30-day and one-year rates of stroke/death. TCAR may serve as a promising less-invasive treatment for carotid disease in older patients who are deemed high anatomic, surgical, or clinical risk for CEAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambar Mehta
- Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, NYP-Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Priya B Patel
- Division of General Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Danielle Bajakian
- Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, NYP-Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard Schutzer
- Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, NYP-Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicholas Morrissey
- Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, NYP-Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Mahmoud Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, NYP-Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rokosh RS, Wu WW, Schermerhorn M, Chaikof EL. Society for Vascular Surgery implementation of clinical practice guidelines for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Postoperative surveillance after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74:1438-1439. [PMID: 34022379 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rae S Rokosh
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Winona W Wu
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Elliot L Chaikof
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mehta A, O'Donnell TFX, Trestman E, Schutzer R, Bajakian D, Morrissey N, Siracuse J, Garg K, Schermerhorn M, Takayama H, Patel VI. The variable impact of aneurysm size on outcomes after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74:425-432.e3. [PMID: 33548418 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies evaluating the association between abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size with postoperative outcomes after open repairs seldom accounted for renal or visceral artery involvement, proximal clamp site, intraoperative renal ischemia time, and hospital volume. This study examined the association between aneurysm size with outcomes after open repairs. METHODS We identified patients who underwent open repairs of infrarenal versus juxtarenal nonruptured AAAs, defined by proximal clamp site, in the 2004-2019 Vascular Quality Initiative. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, failure to rescue, and 1-year mortality. Multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for patient characteristics, operative factors, hospital volume, and hospital clustering. RESULTS We identified 8011 patients (54% infrarenal, 46% juxtarenal). The median aneurysm size did not differ between infrarenal versus juxtarenal aneurysms (5.7 cm vs 5.9 cm; P = .12). For infrarenal aneurysms, every 1-cm increase in size increase the adjusted odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) of 30-day mortality by 18% (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31), failure to rescue by 20% (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.34), 1-year mortality by 18% (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26), but not complications (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.07). For juxtarenal aneurysm, larger aneurysm sizes were not associated with any outcome. Proximal clamp site, ischemia time, and volume were associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The association between AAA size and outcomes matters less with renal and visceral artery aneurysmal involvement, having important implications for surgical decision-making, operative planning, and patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambar Mehta
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Thomas F X O'Donnell
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Eric Trestman
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard Schutzer
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Danielle Bajakian
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicholas Morrissey
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University, Boston, Mass
| | - Karan Garg
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Hiroo Takayama
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Beth JL, Li C, de Guerre L, Dansey K, Lo R, Shuja F, Schermerhorn M. Effect of Symptom Type and Time from Symptom Onset on Outcomes Following Carotid Endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent evidence from randomized controlled trials has raised concerns about the long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated peripheral devices used for femoropopliteal artery revascularization. In response to a call for more real-world data on the safety of these devices, the SAFE-PAD study (Safety Assessment of Femoropopliteal Endovascular treatment with Paclitaxel-coated Devices) was designed with input from the Food and Drug Administration to provide a long-term, comprehensive evaluation of the mortality risk associated with paclitaxel-coated devices among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS AND RESULTS SAFE-PAD is an observational cohort study of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries that underwent femoropopliteal artery revascularization with either a drug-coated device or nondrug-coated device from 2015 through 2018. All patients age 66 years or older who underwent revascularization will be identified using a combination of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision procedural codes, Current Procedural Terminology codes, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System C-codes. The safety end point of all-cause death will be updated semiannually and continued until the median duration of follow-up surpasses 5 years. Sub-group analyses will be conducted by device type, patient characteristics, and procedural setting. Registration: The SAFE-PAD study has been registered on URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04496544. CONCLUSIONS The SAFE-PAD study will evaluate the long-term safety of drug-coated devices compared with nondrug-coated devices for femoropopliteal artery revascularization among a broad, real-world population of patients with peripheral artery disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Secemsky
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology (E.A.S., A.R., C.S., L.R.V., R.W.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.,Division of Cardiology (E.A.S., R.W.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., C.S., M.S., R.W.Y.)
| | - Aishwarya Raja
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology (E.A.S., A.R., C.S., L.R.V., R.W.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Changyu Shen
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology (E.A.S., A.R., C.S., L.R.V., R.W.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., C.S., M.S., R.W.Y.)
| | - Linda R Valsdottir
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology (E.A.S., A.R., C.S., L.R.V., R.W.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Medicine and Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.S.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., C.S., M.S., R.W.Y.)
| | - Robert W Yeh
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology (E.A.S., A.R., C.S., L.R.V., R.W.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.,Division of Cardiology (E.A.S., R.W.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., C.S., M.S., R.W.Y.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Schneider PA, Varcoe RL, Secemsky E, Schermerhorn M, Holden A. Update on paclitaxel for femoral-popliteal occlusive disease in the 15 months following a summary level meta-analysis demonstrated increased risk of late mortality and dose response to paclitaxel. J Vasc Surg 2021; 73:311-322. [PMID: 32890719 PMCID: PMC8076887 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral vascular devices (stents and balloons) coated with paclitaxel were developed to address suboptimal outcomes associated with percutaneous revascularization procedures of the femoral-popliteal arteries. In randomized controlled trials (RCT), paclitaxel-coated devices (PCD) provided increased long-term patency and a decreased need for repeat revascularization procedures compared with uncoated devices. This finding resulted in the adoption of their use for endovascular lower extremity revascularization procedures. However, in late 2018 a study-level meta-analysis showed increased all-cause mortality at 2 years or more after the procedure in patients treated with PCDs. This review examines the subsequent data evaluation following the publication of the meta-analysis. METHODS We review the published responses of physicians, regulatory agencies, and patient advocates during 15-month period after the meta-analysis. We present the additional data gathered from RCTs that comprised the meta-analysis and safety outcomes from large insurance databases in both the United States and Europe. RESULTS Immediately after the publication of the meta-analysis, concern for patient safety resulted in less PCD use, the suspension of large RCTs evaluating their use, and the publication of a letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration informing physicians that there was uncertainty in the benefit-risk profile of these devices for indicated patients and that the potential risk should be assessed before the use of PCDs. Review of the meta-analysis found that a mortality signal was present, but criticisms included that the evaluation was performed on study-level, not patient-level data, and the studies in the analysis were heterogenous in device type, paclitaxel doses, and patient characteristics. Further, the studies were not designed to be pooled nor were they powered for evaluating long-term safety. Clinical characteristics associated with a drug effect or causal relationship were also absent. Specifically, there was no dose response, no clustering of causes of death, and a lack of signal consistency across geographic regions. As more long-term data became available in the RCTs the strength of the mortality signal diminished and analysis of real-world use in large insurance databases, showed that there was no significant increase in all-cause mortality associated with PCD use. CONCLUSIONS The available data do not provide definitive proof for increased mortality with PCD use. A key observation is that trial design improvements will be necessary to better evaluate the risk-benefit profile of PCDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Schneider
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
| | - Ramon L Varcoe
- The Vascular Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eric Secemsky
- Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Andrew Holden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Auckland Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Behrendt CA, Sigvant B, Kuchenbecker J, Grima M, Schermerhorn M, Thomson I, Altreuther M, Setacci C, Svetlikov A, Laxdal E, Goncalves F, Secemsky E, Debus E, Cassar K, Beiles B, Beck A, Mani K, Bertges D. International Variations and Sex Disparities in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: A Report from VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries. J Vasc Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
41
|
Bath J, Lawrence PF, Neal D, Zhao Y, Smith JB, Beck AW, Conte M, Schermerhorn M, Woo K. Endovascular interventions for claudication do not meet minimum standards for the Society for Vascular Surgery efficacy guidelines. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:1693-1700.e3. [PMID: 33253869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Because the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC) is elective, good short- and long-term outcomes are imperative. The objective of the present study was to examine the outcomes of endovascular management of IC reported in the Vascular Quality Initiative and compare them with the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for IC treatment to determine whether real-world results are within the guidelines. METHODS Patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention for IC from 2004 to 2017 with complete data and >9 month follow-up were included. The primary outcome measures were IC recurrence and repeat procedures performed ≤2 years after the initial treatment. RESULTS A total of 16,152 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 66 years. Of the 16,152 patients, 61% were men, 45% were current smokers, and 28% had been discharged without antiplatelet or statin medication. Adjusted analyses revealed that treatment of more than two arteries was associated with a shorter time to IC recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.31) and a shorter time to repeat procedures (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.45). The use of atherectomy was also associated with a shorter time to IC recurrence (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.08-1.33) and a shorter time to repeat procedures (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.52). Discharge with antiplatelet and statin medications was associated with a longer time to IC recurrence (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91) and a longer time to repeat procedures (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87). Life-table analysis at 2 years revealed that only 32% of patients were free from IC recurrence, although 76% had not undergone repeat procedures. Stratified by anatomic treatment level, 37% of isolated aortoiliac interventions, 22% of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions, 30% of isolated femoropopliteal interventions, and 20% of femoropopliteal and tibial interventions had remained free from IC recurrence at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Most patients treated with an endovascular approach to IC did not meet the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for long-term freedom from recurrent symptoms of >50% at 2 years. Many lacked preprocedure optimization of medical management. The use of atherectomy and treatment of more than two arteries were associated with poor outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention for IC, because only 32% of these patients were free from recurrent symptoms at 2 years. Even when risk factor modification is optimized before the procedure, vascular specialists should be aware of the association between atherectomy and multivessel interventions with poorer long-term outcomes and counsel patients appropriately before intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Bath
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo.
| | - Peter F Lawrence
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Dan Neal
- Patient Safety Organization, Society for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, Ill
| | - Yuanyuan Zhao
- Patient Safety Organization, Society for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, Ill
| | - Jamie B Smith
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Michael Conte
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Karen Woo
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dake MD, Fanelli F, Lottes AE, O'Leary EE, Reichert H, Jiang X, Fu W, Iida O, Zen K, Schermerhorn M, Zeller T, Ansel GM. Prediction Model for Freedom from TLR from a Multi-study Analysis of Long-Term Results with the Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Peripheral Stent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 44:196-206. [PMID: 33025243 PMCID: PMC7806559 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02648-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Develop a prediction model to determine the impact of patient and lesion factors on freedom from target lesion revascularization (ffTLR) for patients who are candidates for Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (DES) treatment for femoropopliteal lesions. Methods Patient factors, lesion characteristics, and TLR results from five global studies were utilized for model development. Factors potentially associated with TLR (sex, age, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, renal disease, smoking status, Rutherford classification, lesion length, reference vessel diameter (RVD), popliteal involvement, total occlusion, calcification severity, prior interventions, and number of runoff vessels) were analyzed in a Cox proportional hazards model. Probability of ffTLR was generated for three example patient profiles via combinations of patient and lesion factors. TLR was defined as reintervention performed for ≥ 50% diameter stenosis after recurrent clinical symptoms. Results The model used records from 2227 patients. The median follow-up time was 23.9 months (range: 0.03–60.8). The Kaplan–Meier estimates for ffTLR were 90.5% through 1 year and 75.2% through 5 years. In a multivariate analysis, sex, age, Rutherford classification, lesion length, RVD, total occlusion, and prior interventions were significant factors. The example patient profiles have predicted 1-year ffTLRs of 97.4, 92.3, and 86.0% and 5-year predicted ffTLRs of 92.8, 79.5, and 64.8%. The prediction model is available as an interactive web-based tool (https://cooksfa.z13.web.core.windows.net). Conclusions This is the first prediction model that uses an extensive dataset to determine the impact of patient and lesion factors on ffTLR through 5 years and provides an interactive web-based tool for expected patient outcomes with the Zilver PTX DES. Clinical Trial Registrations Zilver PTX RCT unique identifier: NCT00120406; Zilver PTX single-arm study unique identifier: NCT01094678; Zilver PTX China study unique identifier: NCT02171962; Zilver PTX US post-approval study unique identifier: NCT01901289; Zilver PTX Japan post-market surveillance study unique identifier: NCT02254837. Levels of Evidence Zilver PTX RCT: Level 2, randomized controlled trial; Single-arm study: Level 4, large case series; China study: Level 4, case series; US post-approval study: Level 4, case series Japan PMS study: Level 4, large case series. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00270-020-02648-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Dake
- The University of Arizona, Health Sciences Innovation Building, 1670 East Drachman Street, 9th Floor SVP Suite, P.O. Box 210216, Tucson, AZ, 85721-0216, USA.
| | - Fabrizio Fanelli
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, "Careggi" University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Weiguo Fu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Osamu Iida
- Cardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Kan Zen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas Zeller
- Universitaets-Herz-Zentrum Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | - Gary M Ansel
- Department of Medicine, Ohio Health/Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Behrendt CA, Sigvant B, Kuchenbecker J, Grima MJ, Schermerhorn M, Thomson IA, Altreuther M, Setacci C, Svetlikov A, Laxdal EH, Goncalves FB, Secemsky EA, Debus ES, Cassar K, Beiles B, Beck AW, Mani K, Bertges D. Editor's Choice - International Variations and Sex Disparities in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: A Report from VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 60:873-880. [PMID: 33004283 PMCID: PMC8080993 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine sex specific differences in the invasive treatment of symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) between member states participating in the VASCUNET and International Consortium of Vascular Registries. METHODS Data on open surgical revascularisation and peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) of symptomatic PAOD from 2010 to 2017 were collected from population based administrative and registry data from 11 countries. Differences in age, sex, indication, and invasive treatment modality were analysed. RESULTS Data from 11 countries covering 671 million inhabitants and 1 164 497 hospitalisations (40% women, mean age 72 years, 49% with intermittent claudication, 54% treated with PVI) in Europe (including Russia), North America, Australia, and New Zealand were included. Patient selection and treatment modality varied widely for the proportion of female patients (23% in Portugal and 46% in Sweden), the proportion of patients with claudication (6% in Italy and 69% in Russia), patients' mean age (70 years in the USA and 76 years in Italy), the proportion of octogenarians (8% in Russia and 33% in Sweden), and the proportion of PVI (24% in Russia and 88% in Italy). Numerous differences between females and males were observed in regard to patient age (72 vs. 70 years), the proportion of octogenarians (28% vs. 15%), proportion of patients with claudication (45% vs. 51%), proportion of PVI (57% vs. 51%), and length of hospital stay (7 days vs. 6 days). CONCLUSION Remarkable differences regarding the proportion of peripheral vascular interventions, patients with claudication, and octogenarians were seen across countries and sexes. Future studies should address the underlying reasons for this, including the impact of national societal guidelines, reimbursement, and differences in health maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Research Group GermanVasc, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Birgitta Sigvant
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jenny Kuchenbecker
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Research Group GermanVasc, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthew J Grima
- Department of Surgery, Vascular Unit, Mater Dei Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ian A Thomson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Martin Altreuther
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Carlo Setacci
- Università degli Studi di Siena, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Siena, Italy
| | - Alexei Svetlikov
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Elin H Laxdal
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Eric A Secemsky
- Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E Sebastian Debus
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Research Group GermanVasc, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kevin Cassar
- Department of Surgery, Vascular Unit, Mater Dei Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Barry Beiles
- Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AB, USA
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Daniel Bertges
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Centre, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mehta A, Patel P, Bajakian D, Schutzer R, Morrissey N, Garg K, Malas M, Schermerhorn M, Patel VI. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Carotid Endarterectomy and Transfemoral Stenting in Octogenarians. J Vasc Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
45
|
Malas M, Dakour-Aridi H, Samy N, Naazie I, Mathlouthi A, Schermerhorn M. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of 1-Year Outcomes of Transcarotid Revascularization With Dynamic Flow Reversal, Carotid Endarterectomy, and Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting. J Vasc Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
46
|
de Guerre L, Varkevisser R, Swerdlow N, Li C, Scali S, Patel V, van Herwaarden J, Schermerhorn M. The Degree of Oversizing in Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. J Vasc Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
47
|
Noori VJ, Aranson NJ, Malas M, Schermerhorn M, O'Connor D, Powell RJ, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Nolan BW. Risk factors and impact of postoperative hypotension after carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:975-982. [PMID: 32707379 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hypotension is a frequent complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS). Although common, its occurrence is unpredictable, and association with adverse events has not been well defined. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of postoperative hypotension after CAS and the association with stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), increased length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of all CAS procedures, including transfemoral CAS (TF-CAS) and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), performed in the Vascular Quality Initiative between 2003 and 2018. The primary study end point was postoperative hypotension, defined as hypotension treated with continuous infusion of a vasoactive agent for ≥15 minutes. Secondary end points included any postoperative neurologic events (stroke/TIA), MACEs (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and dysrhythmias), prolonged LOS (>1 day), and in-hospital mortality. Patients' demographics predictive of hypotension were determined by multivariable logistic regression, and a risk score was developed for correlation with outcomes. RESULTS During the time period of study, 24,699 patients underwent CAS; 19,716 (80%) were TF-CAS, 3879 (16%) were TCAR, and 1104 (4%) were not defined. Fifty-six percent were for symptomatic disease, 75% were for a primary atherosclerotic lesion, and 72% were performed under local or regional anesthesia. Postoperative hypotension occurred in 15% of TF-CAS and 14% of TCAR patients (P = .50). Patients with hypotension (vs no hypotension) had higher rates of stroke/TIA (7.3% vs 2.6%; P < .001), MACEs (9.6% vs 2.1%; P < .001), prolonged LOS (65% vs 28%; P < .001), and in-hospital mortality (2.9% vs 0.7%; P < .001). By multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with hypotension included an atherosclerotic (vs restenotic) lesion (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-2.4; P < .001), female sex (1.3 [1.2-1.4]; P < .001), positive stress test result (1.3 [1.2-1.4]; P < .001), age 70 to 79 years (1.1 [1.1-1.3]; P < .002), age >80 years (1.2 [1.1-1.4]; P < .001), history of myocardial infarction or angina (1.3 [1.2-1.4]; P < .001), and an urgent (vs elective) procedure (1.1 [1.0-1.2]; P < .01). A history of hypertension was protective (0.9 [0.8-0.9]; P < .02). A normalized risk score for hypotension was created from the multivariable model. Increasing risk scores correlated directly with rates of adverse events, including postoperative stroke/TIA, MACEs, increased LOS, and increased in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS Hypotension after CAS is associated with adverse neurologic and cardiac events as well as with prolonged LOS and in-hospital mortality. A scoring tool may be valuable in stratifying patients at risk. Interventions aimed at preventing postoperative hypotension may improve outcomes with CAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mahmoud Malas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), San Diego, Calif
| | | | | | - Richard J Powell
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, NH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Grima M, Behrendt CA, Vidal-Diez A, Altreuther M, Björck M, Boyle J, Eldrup N, Karthikesalingam A, Khashram M, Loftus I, Schermerhorn M, Setacci C, Szeberin Z, Debus S, Venermo M, Holt P, Mani K. Assessment of Correlation Between Mean Size of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm at Time of Intact Repair Against Repair and Rupture Rate in Nine Countries. J Vasc Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
49
|
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relatively common and potentially fatal disease. The management of AAA has undergone extensive changes in the last two decades. High quality vascular surgical registries were established early and have been found to be instrumental in the evaluation and monitoring of these changes, most notably the wide implementation of minimally invasive endovascular surgical technology. Trends over the years showed the increased use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) over open repair, the decreasing perioperative adverse outcomes and the early survival advantage of EVAR. Also, data from the early EVAR years changed the views on endoleak management and showed the importance of tracking the implementation of new techniques. Registry data complemented the randomized trials performed in aortic surgery by showing the high rate of laparotomy-related reinterventions after open repair. Also, they are an essential tool for the understanding of outcomes in a broad patient population, evaluating the generalizability of findings from randomized trials and analysing changes over time. By using large-scale data over longer periods of time, the importance of centralization of care to high-volume centres was shown, particularly for open repair. Additionally, large-scale databases can offer an opportunity to assess practice and outcomes in patient subgroups (e.g. treatment of AAA in women and the elderly) as well as in rare aortic pathologies. In this review article, we point out the most important paradigm shifts in AAA management based on vascular registry data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L de Guerre
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Venermo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - K Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Liang P, Motaganahalli R, Swerdlow NJ, Dansey K, Varkevisser RRB, Li C, Lu J, de Guerre L, Shuja F, Schermerhorn M. Protamine use in transfemoral carotid artery stenting is not associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:142-150.e4. [PMID: 32535154 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Protamine use in carotid endarterectomy has been shown to be associated with fewer perioperative bleeding complications without higher rates of thromboembolic events. However, the effect of protamine use on complications after transfemoral carotid artery stenting (CAS) is unclear, and concerns remain about thromboembolic events. METHODS A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing transfemoral CAS in the Vascular Quality Initiative from March 2005 to December 2018. We assessed in-hospital outcomes using propensity score-matched cohorts of patients who did and did not receive protamine. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Secondary outcomes included bleeding complications, stroke, death, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure exacerbation. Bleeding complications were categorized as bleeding resulting in intervention or blood transfusions. RESULTS Of the 17,429 patients undergoing transfemoral CAS, 2697 (15%) patients received protamine. We created 2300 propensity score-matched pairs of patients who did and did not receive protamine. There were no statistically significant differences in stroke or death between the two cohorts (protamine, 2.5%; no protamine, 2.9%; relative risk [RR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.21; P = .37). Protamine use was not associated with statistically significant differences in perioperative bleeding complications resulting in interventional treatment (0.9% vs 0.5%; RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 0.99-4.46; P = .05) or blood transfusion (1.2% vs 1.2%; RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.53-1.61; P = .78). There were also no statistically significant differences for the individual outcomes of stroke (1.8% vs 2.3%; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52-1.16; P = .22), death (0.9% vs 0.8%; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.62-2.19; P = .63), transient ischemic attack (1.4% vs 1.3%; RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.67-1.82; P = .70), myocardial infarction (0.5% vs 0.4%; RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.52-2.78; P = .67), or heart failure exacerbation (1.0% vs 0.9%; RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.58-1.90; P = .88). Protamine use in patients presenting with symptomatic carotid stenosis was associated with lower risk of stroke or death (3.0% vs 4.3%; RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-0.998; P = .048), whereas there were no statistically significant differences in stroke or death with protamine use in asymptomatic patients (1.6% vs 1.0%; RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.67-3.92; P = .28). CONCLUSIONS Heparin reversal with protamine after transfemoral CAS is not associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, and its use in symptomatic carotid disease is associated with a lower risk of stroke or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patric Liang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Raghu Motaganahalli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind
| | - Nicholas J Swerdlow
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Kirsten Dansey
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Rens R B Varkevisser
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Chun Li
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Jinny Lu
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Livia de Guerre
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Fahad Shuja
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
| |
Collapse
|