1
|
Ozga M, Nicolet D, Mrózek K, Yilmaz AS, Kohlschmidt J, Larkin KT, Blachly JS, Oakes CC, Buss J, Walker CJ, Orwick S, Jurinovic V, Rothenberg-Thurley M, Dufour A, Schneider S, Sauerland MC, Görlich D, Krug U, Berdel WE, Woermann BJ, Hiddemann W, Braess J, Subklewe M, Spiekermann K, Carroll AJ, Blum WG, Powell BL, Kolitz JE, Moore JO, Mayer RJ, Larson RA, Uy GL, Stock W, Metzeler KH, Grimes HL, Byrd JC, Salomonis N, Herold T, Mims AS, Eisfeld AK. Sex-associated differences in frequencies and prognostic impact of recurrent genetic alterations in adult acute myeloid leukemia (Alliance, AMLCG). Leukemia 2024; 38:45-57. [PMID: 38017103 PMCID: PMC10776397 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-02068-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
Clinical outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with demographic and genetic features. Although the associations of acquired genetic alterations with patients' sex have been recently analyzed, their impact on outcome of female and male patients has not yet been comprehensively assessed. We performed mutational profiling, cytogenetic and outcome analyses in 1726 adults with AML (749 female and 977 male) treated on frontline Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology protocols. A validation cohort comprised 465 women and 489 men treated on frontline protocols of the German AML Cooperative Group. Compared with men, women more often had normal karyotype, FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, NPM1 and WT1 mutations and less often complex karyotype, ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1, RUNX1, or KIT mutations. More women were in the 2022 European LeukemiaNet intermediate-risk group and more men in adverse-risk group. We found sex differences in co-occurring mutation patterns and prognostic impact of select genetic alterations. The mutation-associated splicing events and gene-expression profiles also differed between sexes. In patients aged <60 years, SF3B1 mutations were male-specific adverse outcome prognosticators. We conclude that sex differences in AML-associated genetic alterations and mutation-specific differential splicing events highlight the importance of patients' sex in analyses of AML biology and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ozga
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Deedra Nicolet
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Krzysztof Mrózek
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Ayse S Yilmaz
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jessica Kohlschmidt
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Karilyn T Larkin
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - James S Blachly
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christopher C Oakes
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jill Buss
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christopher J Walker
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shelley Orwick
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vindi Jurinovic
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maja Rothenberg-Thurley
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Dufour
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Dennis Görlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Utz Krug
- Department of Medicine 3, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang E Berdel
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Braess
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Marion Subklewe
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karsten Spiekermann
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrew J Carroll
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Bayard L Powell
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jonathan E Kolitz
- Monter Cancer Center, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Joseph O Moore
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Geoffrey L Uy
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Wendy Stock
- University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Klaus H Metzeler
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - H Leighton Grimes
- Division of Immunobiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - John C Byrd
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Nathan Salomonis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Tobias Herold
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alice S Mims
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Opatz S, Bamopoulos SA, Metzeler KH, Herold T, Ksienzyk B, Bräundl K, Tschuri S, Vosberg S, Konstandin NP, Wang C, Hartmann L, Graf A, Krebs S, Blum H, Schneider S, Thiede C, Middeke JM, Stölzel F, Röllig C, Schetelig J, Ehninger G, Krämer A, Braess J, Görlich D, Sauerland MC, Berdel WE, Wörmann BJ, Hiddemann W, Spiekermann K, Bohlander SK, Greif PA. The clinical mutatome of core binding factor leukemia. Leukemia 2020; 34:1553-1562. [PMID: 31896782 PMCID: PMC7266744 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-019-0697-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The fusion genes CBFB/MYH11 and RUNX1/RUNX1T1 block differentiation through disruption of the core binding factor (CBF) complex and are found in 10–15% of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. This AML subtype is associated with a favorable prognosis; however, nearly half of CBF-rearranged patients cannot be cured with chemotherapy. This divergent outcome might be due to additional mutations, whose spectrum and prognostic relevance remains hardly defined. Here, we identify nonsilent mutations, which may collaborate with CBF-rearrangements during leukemogenesis by targeted sequencing of 129 genes in 292 adult CBF leukemia patients, and thus provide a comprehensive overview of the mutational spectrum (‘mutatome’) in CBF leukemia. Thereby, we detected fundamental differences between CBFB/MYH11- and RUNX1/RUNX1T1-rearranged patients with ASXL2, JAK2, JAK3, RAD21, TET2, and ZBTB7A being strongly correlated with the latter subgroup. We found prognostic relevance of mutations in genes previously known to be AML-associated such as KIT, SMC1A, and DHX15 and identified novel, recurrent mutations in NFE2 (3%), MN1 (4%), HERC1 (3%), and ZFHX4 (5%). Furthermore, age >60 years, nonprimary AML and loss of the Y-chromosomes are important predictors of survival. These findings are important for refinement of treatment stratification and development of targeted therapy approaches in CBF leukemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Opatz
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Experimental Leukemia & Lymphoma Research, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanos A Bamopoulos
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus H Metzeler
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Experimental Leukemia & Lymphoma Research, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Herold
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bianka Ksienzyk
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Bräundl
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Experimental Leukemia & Lymphoma Research, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Tschuri
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Vosberg
- Experimental Leukemia & Lymphoma Research, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikola P Konstandin
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Wang
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luise Hartmann
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Experimental Leukemia & Lymphoma Research, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Graf
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis at the Gene Center, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Krebs
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis at the Gene Center, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Blum
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis at the Gene Center, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Thiede
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jan Moritz Middeke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedrich Stölzel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christoph Röllig
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Johannes Schetelig
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gerhard Ehninger
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alwin Krämer
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Braess
- Oncology and Hematology, St. John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dennis Görlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang E Berdel
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernhard J Wörmann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Experimental Leukemia & Lymphoma Research, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karsten Spiekermann
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Experimental Leukemia & Lymphoma Research, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan K Bohlander
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Philipp A Greif
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. .,Experimental Leukemia & Lymphoma Research, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rothenberg-Thurley M, Amler S, Goerlich D, Köhnke T, Konstandin NP, Schneider S, Sauerland MC, Herold T, Hubmann M, Ksienzyk B, Zellmeier E, Bohlander SK, Subklewe M, Faldum A, Hiddemann W, Braess J, Spiekermann K, Metzeler KH. Persistence of pre-leukemic clones during first remission and risk of relapse in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2017:leu2017350. [PMID: 29249818 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 11/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Some patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are in complete remission after induction chemotherapy harbor persisting pre-leukemic clones, carrying a subset of leukemia-associated somatic mutations. There is conflicting evidence on the prognostic relevance of these clones for AML relapse. Here, we characterized paired pre-treatment and remission samples from 126 AML patients for mutations in 68 leukemia-associated genes. Fifty patients (40%) retained ⩾1 mutation during remission at a variant allele frequency of ⩾2%. Mutation persistence was most frequent in DNMT3A (65% of patients with mutations at diagnosis), SRSF2 (64%), TET2 (55%), and ASXL1 (46%), and significantly associated with older age (P<0.0001) and, in multivariate analyses adjusting for age, genetic risk, and allogeneic transplantation, with inferior relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.34; P=0039) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.14; P=036). Patients with persisting mutations had a higher cumulative incidence of relapse before, but not after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Our work underlines the relevance of mutation persistence during first remission as a novel risk factor in AML. Persistence of pre-leukemic clones may contribute to the inferior outcome of elderly AML patients. Allogeneic transplantation abrogated the increased relapse risk associated with persisting pre-leukemic clones, suggesting that mutation persistence may guide postremission treatment.Leukemia accepted article preview online, 18 December 2017. doi:10.1038/leu.2017.350.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rothenberg-Thurley
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Amler
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, WWU Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - D Goerlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, WWU Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - T Köhnke
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N P Konstandin
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Schneider
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M C Sauerland
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, WWU Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - T Herold
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Hubmann
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - B Ksienzyk
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - E Zellmeier
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S K Bohlander
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - M Subklewe
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Faldum
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, WWU Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - W Hiddemann
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Braess
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - K Spiekermann
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K H Metzeler
- Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herold T, Jurinovic V, Batcha AMN, Bamopoulos SA, Rothenberg-Thurley M, Ksienzyk B, Hartmann L, Greif PA, Phillippou-Massier J, Krebs S, Blum H, Amler S, Schneider S, Konstandin N, Sauerland MC, Görlich D, Berdel WE, Wörmann BJ, Tischer J, Subklewe M, Bohlander SK, Braess J, Hiddemann W, Metzeler KH, Mansmann U, Spiekermann K. A 29-gene and cytogenetic score for the prediction of resistance to induction treatment in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2017; 103:456-465. [PMID: 29242298 PMCID: PMC5830382 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2017.178442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary therapy resistance is a major problem in acute myeloid leukemia treatment. We set out to develop a powerful and robust predictor for therapy resistance for intensively treated adult patients. We used two large gene expression data sets (n=856) to develop a predictor of therapy resistance, which was validated in an independent cohort analyzed by RNA sequencing (n=250). In addition to gene expression markers, standard clinical and laboratory variables as well as the mutation status of 68 genes were considered during construction of the model. The final predictor (PS29MRC) consisted of 29 gene expression markers and a cytogenetic risk classification. A continuous predictor is calculated as a weighted linear sum of the individual variables. In addition, a cut off was defined to divide patients into a high-risk and a low-risk group for resistant disease. PS29MRC was highly significant in the validation set, both as a continuous score (OR=2.39, P=8.63·10−9, AUC=0.76) and as a dichotomous classifier (OR=8.03, P=4.29·10−9); accuracy was 77%. In multivariable models, only TP53 mutation, age and PS29MRC (continuous: OR=1.75, P=0.0011; dichotomous: OR=4.44, P=0.00021) were left as significant variables. PS29MRC dominated all models when compared with currently used predictors, and also predicted overall survival independently of established markers. When integrated into the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 genetic risk stratification, four groups (median survival of 8, 18, 41 months, and not reached) could be defined (P=4.01·10−10). PS29MRC will make it possible to design trials which stratify induction treatment according to the probability of response, and refines the ELN 2017 classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Herold
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vindi Jurinovic
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Aarif M N Batcha
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Bianka Ksienzyk
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Luise Hartmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp A Greif
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Krebs
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Helmut Blum
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Susanne Amler
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Dennis Görlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang E Berdel
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany
| | | | - Johanna Tischer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Subklewe
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan K Bohlander
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jan Braess
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus H Metzeler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Karsten Spiekermann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herold T, Metzeler KH, Vosberg S, Hartmann L, Jurinovic V, Opatz S, Konstandin NP, Schneider S, Zellmeier E, Ksienzyk B, Graf A, Krebs S, Blum H, Cristina Sauerland M, Büchner T, Berdel WE, Wörmann BJ, Mansmann U, Hiddemann W, Bohlander SK, Spiekermann K, Greif PA. Acute myeloid leukemia with del(9q) is characterized by frequent mutations of NPM1, DNMT3A, WT1 and low expression of TLE4. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2016; 56:75-86. [PMID: 27636548 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Deletions of the long arm of chromosome 9 [del(9q)] are a rare but recurring aberration in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Del(9q) can be found as the sole abnormality or in combination with other cytogenetic aberrations such as t(8;21) and t(15;17). TLE1 and TLE4 were identified to be critical genes contained in the 9q region. We performed whole exome sequencing of 5 patients with del(9q) as the sole abnormality followed by targeted amplicon sequencing of 137 genes of 26 patients with del(9q) as sole or combined with other aberrations. We detected frequent mutations in NPM1 (10/26; 38%), DNMT3A (8/26; 31%), and WT1 (8/26; 31%) but only few FLT3-ITDs (2/26; 8%). All mutations affecting NPM1 and DNMT3A were exclusively identified in patients with del(9q) as the sole abnormality and were significantly more frequent compared to 111 patients classified as intermediate-II according to the European LeukemiaNet (10/14, 71% vs. 22/111, 20%; P < 0.001, 8/14, 57% vs. 26/111, 23%; P = 0.02). Furthermore, we identified DNMT3B to be rarely but recurrently targeted by truncating mutations in AML. Gene expression analysis of 13 patients with del(9q) and 454 patients with normal karyotype or various cytogenetic aberrations showed significant down regulation of TLE4 in patients with del(9q) (P = 0.02). Interestingly, downregulation of TLE4 was not limited to AML with del(9q), potentially representing a common mechanism in AML pathogenesis. Our comprehensive genetic analysis of the del(9q) subgroup reveals a unique mutational profile with the frequency of DNMT3A mutations in the del(9q) only subset being the highest reported so far in AML, indicating oncogenic cooperativity. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Herold
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany.,Clinical Cooperative Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Center Munich for Environmental Health, München, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus H Metzeler
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany.,Clinical Cooperative Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Center Munich for Environmental Health, München, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Vosberg
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany.,Clinical Cooperative Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Center Munich for Environmental Health, München, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Luise Hartmann
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany.,Clinical Cooperative Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Center Munich for Environmental Health, München, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vindi Jurinovic
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | - Sabrina Opatz
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany.,Clinical Cooperative Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Center Munich for Environmental Health, München, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nikola P Konstandin
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | - Evelyn Zellmeier
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | - Bianka Ksienzyk
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | - Alexander Graf
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | - Stefan Krebs
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | - Helmut Blum
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Büchner
- Department of Medicine A-Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Wolfgang E Berdel
- Department of Medicine A-Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernhard J Wörmann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany.,Clinical Cooperative Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Center Munich for Environmental Health, München, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan K Bohlander
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Karsten Spiekermann
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany.,Clinical Cooperative Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Center Munich for Environmental Health, München, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp A Greif
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany.,Clinical Cooperative Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Center Munich for Environmental Health, München, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Büchner T, Krug UO, Peter Gale R, Heinecke A, Sauerland MC, Haferlach C, Schnittger S, Haferlach T, Müller-Tidow C, Stelljes M, Mesters RM, Serve HL, Braess J, Spiekermann K, Staib P, Grüneisen A, Reichle A, Balleisen L, Eimermacher H, Giagounidis A, Rasche H, Lengfelder E, Görlich D, Faldum A, Köpcke W, Hehlmann R, Wörmann BJ, Berdel WE, Hiddemann W. Age, not therapy intensity, determines outcomes of adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2016; 30:1781-4. [PMID: 26965440 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Büchner
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - U O Krug
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Leverkusen; Leverkusen, Germany
| | - R Peter Gale
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Haematology Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Heinecke
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - M C Sauerland
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - C Haferlach
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany
| | | | - T Haferlach
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany
| | - C Müller-Tidow
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - M Stelljes
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - R M Mesters
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - H L Serve
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
| | - J Braess
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - K Spiekermann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Munich, Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - P Staib
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, St -Antonius Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - A Grüneisen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Clinic Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Reichle
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - L Balleisen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Hamm, Germany
| | - H Eimermacher
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, KKH St Marien Hospital, Hagen, Germany
| | - A Giagounidis
- Marienhospital Düsseldorf, Clinic for Oncology, Hematology and Palliative Care, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - H Rasche
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - E Lengfelder
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - D Görlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - A Faldum
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - W Köpcke
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - R Hehlmann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - B J Wörmann
- German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - W E Berdel
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - W Hiddemann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Munich, Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Amler S, Sauerland MC, Deiters C, Büchner T, Schumacher A. Factors influencing life satisfaction in acute myeloid leukemia survivors following allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13:28. [PMID: 25888906 PMCID: PMC4349480 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0222-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the preferred option of postremission therapy for high-risk patients suffering from acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therefore, monitoring life satisfaction (LS) of long-term survivors following alloSCT is becoming increasingly important for oncologists. The aim of the study was to evaluate individual survivor priority of various general and health-related domains of life and their satisfaction with these domains. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of general and health-related LS on resilience, anxiety, depression and quality of life in AML survivors following alloSCT. METHODS Forty-one AML survivors (median age at time of assessment = 49.0 years) who had undergone alloSCT (median time since transplantation = 3.1 years) were enrolled in the study. Psychosocial parameters were assessed using the following instruments: FLZ(M) (Questions on Life Satisfaction), EORTC QLQ-C30, HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and the RS-25 (Resilience Scale-25 items). Correlation analyses were computed to reveal the associations between the different questionnaires. RESULTS Independence from help or care, well-regulated living conditions and financial security contributed positively to LS, whereas being off work due to health-reasons and dissatisfaction with physical aspects were negatively associated to the subjective feelings of overall satisfaction. Moreover, a high quality of life was strongly positively correlated with LS (Spearman's rho general LS: 0.643 and health-related LS: 0.726, both p < 0.001). A high degree of resilience was also strongly positively correlated with better LS (general LS: 0.700, health-related LS: 0.675, both p < 0.001). Symptoms of anxiety and depression were associated with an impaired general LS (anxiety: -0.674, depression: -0.698, both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that LS should be considered an important key contributor to the survivors' well-being following alloSCT. Thus, identifying protective psychological and physical factors that relieve stressors is of high importance in order to support long-term AML survivors with their special needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Amler
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149, Muenster, Germany.
| | - Maria Cristina Sauerland
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149, Muenster, Germany.
| | - Christian Deiters
- University Hospital of Muenster, Medicine A - Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Pneumology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149, Muenster, Germany.
| | - Thomas Büchner
- University Hospital of Muenster, Medicine A - Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Pneumology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149, Muenster, Germany.
| | - Andrea Schumacher
- University Hospital of Muenster, Medicine A - Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Pneumology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149, Muenster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pastore F, Dufour A, Benthaus T, Metzeler KH, Maharry KS, Schneider S, Ksienzyk B, Mellert G, Zellmeier E, Kakadia PM, Unterhalt M, Feuring-Buske M, Buske C, Braess J, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Krug U, Berdel WE, Buechner T, Woermann B, Hiddemann W, Bohlander SK, Marcucci G, Spiekermann K, Bloomfield CD, Hoster E. Combined molecular and clinical prognostic index for relapse and survival in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1586-94. [PMID: 24711548 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.52.3480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the largest and most heterogeneous cytogenetic AML subgroup. For the practicing clinician, it is difficult to summarize the prognostic information of the growing number of clinical and molecular markers. Our purpose was to develop a widely applicable prognostic model by combining well-established pretreatment patient and disease characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two prognostic indices for CN-AML (PINA), one regarding overall survival (OS; PINAOS) and the other regarding relapse-free survival (RFS; PINARFS), were derived from data of 572 patients with CN-AML treated within the AML Cooperative Group 99 study (www.aml-score.org). RESULTS On the basis of age (median, 60 years; range, 17 to 85 years), performance status, WBC count, and mutation status of NPM1, CEBPA, and FLT3-internal tandem duplication, patients were classified into the following three risk groups according to PINAOS and PINARFS: 29% of all patients and 32% of 381 responding patients had low-risk disease (5-year OS, 74%; 5-year RFS, 55%); 56% of all patients and 39% of responding patients had intermediate-risk disease (5-year OS, 28%; 5-year RFS, 27%), and 15% of all patients and 29% of responding patients had high-risk disease (5-year OS, 3%; 5-year RFS, 5%), respectively. PINAOS and PINARFS stratified outcome within European LeukemiaNet genetic groups. Both indices were confirmed on independent data from Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance trials. CONCLUSION We have developed and validated, to our knowledge, the first prognostic indices specifically designed for adult patients of all ages with CN-AML that combine well-established molecular and clinical variables and that are easily applicable in routine clinical care. The integration of both clinical and molecular markers could provide a basis for individualized patient care through risk-adapted therapy of CN-AML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Pastore
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Annika Dufour
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Tobias Benthaus
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Klaus H Metzeler
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Kati S Maharry
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Bianka Ksienzyk
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gudrun Mellert
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Evelyn Zellmeier
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Purvi M Kakadia
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Michael Unterhalt
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Michaela Feuring-Buske
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Christian Buske
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jan Braess
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Maria Cristina Sauerland
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Achim Heinecke
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Utz Krug
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Wolfgang E Berdel
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Thomas Buechner
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Bernhard Woermann
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Stefan K Bohlander
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Guido Marcucci
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Karsten Spiekermann
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Clara D Bloomfield
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Eva Hoster
- Friederike Pastore, Annika Dufour, Tobias Benthaus, Klaus H. Metzeler, Stephanie Schneider, Bianka Ksienzyk, Gudrun Mellert, Evelyn Zellmeier, Purvi M. Kakadia, Michael Unterhalt, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, Karsten Spiekermann, and Eva Hoster, University Hospital Munich Großhadern; Friederike Pastore, Klaus H. Metzeler, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Stefan K. Bohlander, and Karsten Spiekermann, Helmholtz Center Munich; Eva Hoster, University of Munich, Munich; Purvi M. Kakadia and Stefan K. Bohlander, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Michaela Feuring-Buske, University Hospital Ulm; Christian Buske, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm; Jan Braess, Klinikum Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg; Maria Cristina Sauerland and Achim Heinecke, University of Muenster; Utz Krug, Wolfgang E. Berdel, and Thomas Buechner, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Bernhard Woermann, German Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Kati S. Maharry, Guido Marcucci, and Clara D. Bloomfield, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Kati S. Maharry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Stefan K. Bohlander, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Büchner T, Schlenk RF, Schaich M, Döhner K, Krahl R, Krauter J, Heil G, Krug U, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Späth D, Kramer M, Scholl S, Berdel WE, Hiddemann W, Hoelzer D, Hehlmann R, Hasford J, Hoffmann VS, Döhner H, Ehninger G, Ganser A, Niederwieser DW, Pfirrmann M. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): different treatment strategies versus a common standard arm--combined prospective analysis by the German AML Intergroup. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:3604-10. [PMID: 22965967 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.42.2907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Identifying true therapeutic progress in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) requires a comparison of treatment strategies and results on the basis of uniform patient selection. To foster comparability across five clinical studies, we introduced a common standard arm combined with a general upfront randomization and performed prospective analyses with adjustment for differences in prognostic baseline characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS Whereas the studies' own regimens differed in chemotherapies, risk adaption, and guidelines for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, the standard arm contained uniform cytarabine- and anthracycline-based standard-dose remission induction and high-dose consolidation courses. RESULTS Of 2,995 evaluable patients aged 16 to 60 years, 290 patients were randomly assigned to the common standard arm. Seventy percent of the 290 achieved complete remissions (62% with complete recovery, 8% with incomplete recovery; 95% CI, 65% to 76%). Five-year survival probabilities were 44.3% (95% CI, 37.7% to 50.7%) for overall survival, 44.8% (95% CI, 37.0% to 52.2%) for relapse-free survival, and 31.5% (95% CI, 25.7% to 37.4%) for event-free survival. Neither the unadjusted survival probabilities of the Kaplan-Meier method nor their adjustment for prognostic variables in multiple Cox regression models led to statistically significant different results in the three survival end points when the outcomes of each study were compared with the standard arm. CONCLUSION A strictly prospective comparison of different treatment strategies in patients with AML did not show clinically relevant outcome differences when compared through a common standard treatment arm. The results provide a representative basis for further therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Büchner
- Department of Internal Medicine A-Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Geb. A 1, 48129 Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Greif PA, Konstandin NP, Metzeler KH, Herold T, Pasalic Z, Ksienzyk B, Dufour A, Schneider F, Schneider S, Kakadia PM, Braess J, Sauerland MC, Berdel WE, Büchner T, Woermann BJ, Hiddemann W, Spiekermann K, Bohlander SK. RUNX1 mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia are associated with a poor prognosis and up-regulation of lymphoid genes. Haematologica 2012; 97:1909-15. [PMID: 22689681 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2012.064667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The RUNX1 (AML1) gene is a frequent mutational target in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Previous studies suggested that RUNX1 mutations may have pathological and prognostic implications. DESIGN AND METHODS We screened 93 patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia for RUNX1 mutations by capillary sequencing of genomic DNA. Mutation status was then correlated with clinical data and gene expression profiles. RESULTS We found that 15 out of 93 (16.1%) patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia had RUNX1 mutations. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in the AMLCG-99 trial and carried ten RUNX1 mutations (13.7%). Among these 73 patients RUNX1 mutations were significantly associated with older age, male sex, absence of NPM1 mutations and presence of MLL-partial tandem duplications. Moreover, RUNX1-mutated patients had a lower complete remission rate (30% versus 73% P=0.01), lower relapse-free survival rate (3-year relapse-free survival 0% versus 30.4%; P=0.002) and lower overall survival rate (3-year overall survival 0% versus 34.4%; P<0.001) than patients with wild-type RUNX1. RUNX1 mutations remained associated with shorter overall survival in a multivariate model including age and the European Leukemia Net acute myeloid leukemia genetic classification as covariates. Patients with RUNX1 mutations showed a unique gene expression pattern with differential expression of 85 genes. The most prominently up-regulated genes in patients with RUNX1-mutated cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia include lymphoid regulators such as HOP homeobox (HOPX), deoxynucleotidyltransferase (DNTT, terminal) and B-cell linker (BLNK), indicating lineage infidelity. CONCLUSIONS Our findings firmly establish that RUNX1 mutations are a marker of poor prognosis and provide insights into the pathogenesis of RUNX1 mutation-positive acute myeloid leukemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp A Greif
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buchner T, Berdel WE, Haferlach C, Schnittger S, Stelljes M, Silling G, Staib P, Grueneisen A, Reichle A, Balleisen L, Eimermacher H, Giagounidis A, Rasche H, Lengfelder E, Krug U, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Wormann BJ, Hiddemann W. Assessment of age as its own risk factor in AML. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.6610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6610 Background: Patients’ age is an important issue in treatment decisions for AML, while its role in this disease remains poorly explained. Methods: In the AMLCG 1999 trial 1223 patients (pts) were 16-59y and 1470 pts were 60-85y of age. Their treatment was randomized between TAD-HAM vs HAM-HAM induction (TAD, standard dose thioguanine, cytarabine, daunorubicin 60mg/m² x 3; HAM, high-dose cytarabine 3g/m² x 6, mitoxantrone 10mg/m² x 3), TAD consolidation and monthly maintenance vs autologous SCT, any chemotherapy + vs - G-CSF priming. All randomization was done upfront. Pts of <60y received routine double induction and full dose HAM while pts of 60+y preferentially received only one course induction and HAM at 1g instead of 3g cytarabine /m² x 6. Results: With little differences according randomizations, pts <60y and 60+y achieved a complete remission rate (CR) of 70.2% and 53.5% (p<.001), overall survival (OS) at 5y of 41.3% and 12.9% (p<.001) and a relapse rate (RR) of 49.0 and 72.0% (p<.001). We also focussed on pts around 60y of age and compared the 172 pts of 57-59y with the 261 pts of 60-62y excluding pts undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. According to their similar age the two groups showed similar baseline characteristics. In contrast and due to the cut-off point for age adaption at 60y they differed considerably in treatment. Expressed by the cumulative dosage of cytarabine, the difference between the two groups was by factor 2.9. This difference, however, did not translate into a different outcome being 62% vs 60% CR, 28% vs 21% 5y OS (p=0.25), and 73% vs 73% RR at 5y. A multivariable analysis in all pts between 16 and 85y of age identified cytogenetik/ molecular risk and age as a continuous variable, to be risk factors predicting CR, OS, as well as RR. In pts of 16-60y those below and above the median age of 47y differed in their CR rate by 75% vs 66% (p<.001), their OS by 49% vs 35% (p<.001) and in their RR by 45% vs 53% (p=.007). In pts of 60-85y those below and above the median age of 67y differed in their CR rate by 57% vs 51% (p=.023), and their OS by 16% vs 11% (p<.001), while their RR was similarly 71%. Conclusions: The outcome in pts with AML is substantially determined by patients’ age as its own risk factor, and not by treatment intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Albrecht Reichle
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Utz Krug
- University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brunnberg U, Mohr M, Noppeney R, Dürk HA, Sauerland MC, Müller-Tidow C, Krug U, Koschmieder S, Kessler T, Mesters RM, Schulz C, Kosch M, Büchner T, Ehninger G, Dührsen U, Serve H, Berdel WE. Induction therapy of AML with ara-C plus daunorubicin versus ara-C plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin: a randomized phase II trial in elderly patients. Ann Oncol 2011; 23:990-6. [PMID: 21810729 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) results in a median overall survival (OS) of ≤ 1 year. Elderly patients often present with cardiac comorbidity. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is active in elderly (≥ 60 years) patients with relapsed AML with low cardiac toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized phase II study compared a standard combination of ara-C and daunorubicin (DNR; 7+3) versus ara-C plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin (7+GO) as the first course of induction therapy. Primary objectives were comparison of blast clearance on day 16, event-free survival (EFS), and remission duration. OS, complete remission (CR), and tolerability were secondary objectives. RESULTS One hundred and nineteen patients with de novo AML, treatment-related AML, AML with a history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or high-risk MDS entered the study. Median age of 115 patients (intent-to-treat population) was 69 years. Protocol outlined a second course 7+3 for patients without blast clearance and two courses of high-dose ara-C consolidation upon CR. Both treatments were equally effective in blast clearance, CR, EFS, remission duration, or OS (median: 7+3, 9 months; 7+GO, 10 months). Induction death rate was higher in the GO group due to veno-occlusive disease. CONCLUSION The study did not show significant superiority of 7+GO over standard 7+3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Brunnberg
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Krug U, Röllig C, Koschmieder A, Heinecke A, Sauerland MC, Schaich M, Thiede C, Kramer M, Braess J, Spiekermann K, Haferlach T, Haferlach C, Koschmieder S, Rohde C, Serve H, Wörmann B, Hiddemann W, Ehninger G, Berdel WE, Büchner T, Müller-Tidow C. Complete remission and early death after intensive chemotherapy in patients aged 60 years or older with acute myeloid leukaemia: a web-based application for prediction of outcomes. Lancet 2010; 376:2000-8. [PMID: 21131036 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62105-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 50% of patients (age ≥60 years) who have acute myeloid leukaemia and are otherwise medically healthy (ie, able to undergo intensive chemotherapy) achieve a complete remission (CR) after intensive chemotherapy, but with a substantially increased risk of early death (ED) compared with younger patients. We verified the association of standard clinical and laboratory variables with CR and ED and developed a web-based application for risk assessment of intensive chemotherapy in these patients. METHODS Multivariate regression analysis was used to develop risk scores with or without knowledge of the cytogenetic and molecular risk profiles for a cohort of 1406 patients (aged ≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukaemia, but otherwise medically healthy, who were treated with two courses of intensive induction chemotherapy (tioguanine, standard-dose cytarabine, and daunorubicin followed by high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone; or with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in the first and second induction courses) in the German Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Cooperative Group 1999 study. Risk prediction was validated in an independent cohort of 801 patients (aged >60 years) with acute myeloid leukaemia who were given two courses of cytarabine and daunorubicin in the Acute Myeloid Leukaemia 1996 study. FINDINGS Body temperature, age, de-novo leukaemia versus leukaemia secondary to cytotoxic treatment or an antecedent haematological disease, haemoglobin, platelet count, fibrinogen, and serum concentration of lactate dehydrogenase were significantly associated with CR or ED. The probability of CR with knowledge of cytogenetic and molecular risk (score 1) was from 12% to 91%, and without knowledge (score 2) from 21% to 80%. The predicted risk of ED was from 6% to 69% for score 1 and from 7% to 63% for score 2. The predictive power of the risk scores was confirmed in the independent patient cohort (CR score 1, from 10% to 91%; CR score 2, from 16% to 80%; ED score 1, from 6% to 69%; and ED score 2, from 7% to 61%). INTERPRETATION The scores for acute myeloid leukaemia can be used to predict the probability of CR and the risk of ED in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, but otherwise medically healthy, for whom intensive induction chemotherapy is planned. This information can help physicians with difficult decisions for treatment of these patients. FUNDING Deutsche Krebshilfe and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utz Krug
- Department of Medicine A, Haematology and Oncology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Büchner T, Berdel WE, Schoch C, Haferlach T, Serve HL, Kienast J, Schnittger S, Kern W, Tchinda J, Reichle A, Lengfelder E, Staib P, Ludwig WD, Aul C, Eimermacher H, Balleisen L, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Wörmann BJ, Hiddemann W. In Reply. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.08.4319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Büchner
- Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Wolfgang E. Berdel
- Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Claudia Schoch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany
| | | | - Hubert L. Serve
- Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Joachim Kienast
- Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Kern
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Joelle Tchinda
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Albrecht Reichle
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva Lengfelder
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Staib
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Carlo Aul
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, St Johannes Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Achim Heinecke
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biomathematics, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Bernhard J. Wörmann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Municipal Medical Centre, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, and the GSF National Center for Environment and Health, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Büchner T, Berdel WE, Wörmann B, Schoch C, Haferlach T, Schnittger S, Kern W, Aul C, Lengfelder E, Schumacher A, Reichle A, Staib P, Balleisen L, Eimermacher H, Grüneisen A, Rasche H, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Mesters RM, Serve HL, Kienast J, Hiddemann W. Treatment of older patients with AML. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2005; 56:247-59. [PMID: 16246568 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2004] [Revised: 08/30/2004] [Accepted: 09/24/2004] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Undertreatment of the older patients with AML can explain, in part, their inferior outcome when compared with that in younger patients. In analogy to the benefit of patients under the age of 60 years from high-dose AraC there are dosage related therapeutic effects in the patients over 60 years in particular for daunorubicin in the induction treatment, and for maintenance versus no maintenance in the post-remission treatment. Utilizing these effects can partly overcome the mostly unfavorable disease biology in older age AML, whereas the role of risk factors involved is not completely understood and the concept of dose-response needs to be requestioned. We recommend an adequate dosage of 60 mg/(m2day) daunorubicin for 3 days in a combination with standard dose AraC and 6-thioguanine given for induction and consolidation and followed by a prolonged monthly maintenance chemotherapy. Further improvements in supportive care may help delivering additional anti-leukemic cytotoxicity. As a novel approach, reduced toxicity preparative regimens may open up allogeneic transplantation for older patients with AML. Other new options like MDR modulators, antibody targeted therapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are under clinical investigation. A questionnaire study in patients with AML showed that according to patients' self-assessment intensive and prolonged treatment did not result in decreasing quality of life. This finding did not vary by age under or above 60 years. Given the actual median age in this disease being more than 60 years the adequate management of older age AML remains as the major challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Büchner
- University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, D-48129 Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kienast J, Stelljes M, Berning B, Kröger M, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Schoch C, Wörmann B, Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Berdel WE. Rationale and design of Total Therapy Study XV for newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Ann Hematol 2004; 83 Suppl 1:S136-7. [PMID: 15124707 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-004-0850-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The current cure rate of 80% in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) attests to the effectiveness of risk-directed therapy developed through well-designed clinical trials. The ongoing Total Therapy Study XV at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital was designed to further increase cure rate and to improve quality of life. The study consists of intensive systemic and intrathecal therapy but does not include cranial irradiation, irrespective of a patient's risk features. The intensity of postremission consolidation, continuation and reinduction therapy is based on the level of minimal residual disease at the end of induction, as measured by both flow cytometric detection of aberrant immunophenotypes and polymerase-chain-reaction amplification of clonal antigen-receptor gene rearrangements. Status of thiopurine methyltransferase is determined prospectively for treatment modification. Pharmacogenetic, pharmacodynamic, gene expression and proteomic profiling studies of host normal cells and leukemic cells are performed in parallel to elucidate the mechanisms of drug resistance and to advance our understanding of leukemogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kienast
- Dept. of Medicine / Hematology and Oncology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Haferlach T, Kern W, Schoch C, Schnittger S, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Büchner T, Hiddemann W. A new prognostic score for patients with acute myeloid leukemia based on cytogenetics and early blast clearance in trials of the German AML Cooperative Group. Haematologica 2004; 89:408-18. [PMID: 15075074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To refine cytogenetically based risk-stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). DESIGN AND METHODS Stratification was improved by combining cytogenetics and day 16 bone marrow blasts and by subdividing unfavorable cytogenetics. The new score identifying five prognostically different groups was developed in 321 patients (AMLCG 1992 trial) and subsequently validated in 680 patients (AMLCG 1999 trial). RESULTS Subgroups defined were: 1) favorable cytogenetics (t(8;21), inv(16)); 2) intermediate cytogenetics (normal karyotype, other abnormalities not rated favorable or unfavorable) and day 16 blasts <10%; 3) intermediate cytogenetics and day 16 blasts >or=10%; 4) unfavorable cytogenetics (-5/5q-, -7/7q-, 3q21q26 aberrations, 11q23 aberrations, 12p-, 17p-) excluding complex aberrations; 5) complex aberrant karyotypes (>or=3 aberrations). In AMLCG 1992 patients significant differences were observed with regard to complete remission (CR) rate (82%, 83%, 58%, 76%, 53%), persistent leukemia (PL) rate (7%, 8%, 33%, 14%, 31%), median event-free survival (EFS; 25, 14, 5, 6, 2 months), median overall survival (OS; not reached, 26, 12, 14, 6 months), and median relapse-free survival (RFS; 26, 19, 13, 8, 4 months). The prospective validation of the score proved its significant power (AMLCG 1999 cohort) with regard to CR (63%, 65%, 51%, 45%, 35%), PL (17%, 18%, 40%, 35%, 48%), median EFS (14, 7, 3, 2, 2 months), median OS (25, 15, 12, 6, 4 months), and median RFS (not reached, 15, 10, 8, 5 months). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS This new prognostic score provides a highly valuable tool for future clinical trials in AML focusing on distinct and subgroup-specific treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Haferlach
- Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital Grosshadern, Dept. of Internal Medicine III, München, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Berdel WE, Wörmann B, Schoch C, Fonatsch C, Löffler H, Haferlach T, Ludwig WD, Maschmeyer G, Staib P, Aul C, Gruneisen A, Lengfelder E, Frickhofen N, Kern W, Serve HL, Mesters RM, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A. 6-Thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) and high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM) for induction, TAD for consolidation, and either prolonged maintenance by reduced monthly TAD or TAD-HAM-TAD and one course of intensive consolidation by sequential HAM in adult patients at all ages with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a randomized trial of the German AML Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2004; 21:4496-504. [PMID: 14673036 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.02.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the efficacy of prolonged maintenance chemotherapy versus intensified consolidation therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight hundred thirty-two patients (median age, 54 years; range, 16 to 82 years) with de novo AML were randomly assigned to receive 6-thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) plus cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM; cytarabine 3 g/m2 [age < 60 years] or 1 g/m2 [age > or = 60 years] x 6) induction, TAD consolidation, and monthly modified TAD maintenance for 3 years, or TAD-HAM-TAD and one course of intensive consolidation with sequential HAM (S-HAM) with cytarabine 1 g/m2 (age < 60 years) or 0.5 g/m2 (age > or = 60 years) x 8 instead of maintenance. RESULTS A total of 69.2% patients went into complete remission (CR). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 19 months for patients on the maintenance arm, with 31.4% of patients relapse-free at 5 years, versus 12 months for patients on the S-HAM arm, with 24.7% of patients relapse-free at 5 years (P =.0118). RFS from maintenance was superior in patients with poor risk by unfavorable karyotype, age > or = 60 years, lactate dehydrogenase level greater than 700 U/L, or day 16 bone marrow blasts greater than 40% (P =.0061) but not in patients with good risk by complete absence of any poor risk factors. Although a survival benefit in the CR patients is not significant (P =.085), more surviving patients in the maintenance than in the S-HAM arm remain in first CR (P =.026). CONCLUSION We conclude that TAD-HAM-TAD-maintenance first-line treatment has a higher curative potential than TAD-HAM-TAD-S-HAM and improves prognosis even among patients with poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Büchner
- University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University of Muenster, Ulbert-Schweitzer-Str 33, D-48129 Muenster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Haferlach T, Schoch C, Löffler H, Gassmann W, Kern W, Schnittger S, Fonatsch C, Ludwig WD, Wuchter C, Schlegelberger B, Staib P, Reichle A, Kubica U, Eimermacher H, Balleisen L, Grüneisen A, Haase D, Aul C, Karow J, Lengfelder E, Wörmann B, Heinecke A, Sauerland MC, Büchner T, Hiddemann W. Morphologic dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is related to unfavorable cytogenetics but has no independent prognostic relevance under the conditions of intensive induction therapy: results of a multiparameter analysis from the German AML Cooperative Group studies. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:256-65. [PMID: 12525517 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE On the basis of cytomorphology according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification, we evaluated the prognostic impact of dysplastic features and other parameters in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We also assessed the clinical significance of the recently introduced World Health Organization (WHO) classification for AML, which proposed dysplasia as a new parameter for classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed prospectively 614 patients with de novo AML, all of whom were diagnosed by central morphologic analysis and treated within the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG)-92 or the AMLCG-acute promyalocytic leukemia study. RESULTS Patients with AML M3, M3v, or M4eo demonstrated a better outcome compared with all other FAB subtypes (P <.001); no prognostic difference was observed among other FAB subtypes. The presence or absence of dysplasia failed to demonstrate prognostic relevance. Other prognostic markers, such as age, cytogenetics, presence of Auer rods, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level at diagnosis, all showed significant impact on overall and event-free survival in univariate analyses (P <.001 for all parameters tested). However, in a multivariate analysis, only cytogenetics (unfavorable or favorable), age, and high LDH maintained their prognostic impact. Dysplasia was not found to be an independent prognostic parameter, but the detection of trilineage dysplasia correlated with unfavorable cytogenetics. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that cytomorphology and classification according to FAB criteria are still necessary for the diagnosis of AML but have no relevance for prognosis in addition to cytogenetics. Our results suggest that the WHO classification should be further developed by using cytogenetics as the main determinant of biology. Dysplastic features, in particular, have no additional impact on predicting prognosis when cytogenetics are taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Haferlach
- Department of Medicine III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Schoch C, Haferlach T, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A. Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML): treatment of the older patient. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2001; 14:139-51. [PMID: 11355928 DOI: 10.1053/beha.2000.0120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Undertreatment of the older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) can explain, in part, their inferior outcome when compared with that of younger patients. Corresponding to the benefit to patients under the age of 60 from high-dose Ara-C there are also dose effects in those over 60 years old, in particular for daunorubicin in the induction treatment, and for the quantity in terms of duration of postremission treatment. The use of these effects can partly overcome the mostly unfavourable disease biology seen in older age AML patients, which is expressed by the absence of favourable and the over-representation of adverse chromosomal abnormalities as well as by the expression of drug resistance. We recommend an adequate dosage of 60 mg/m(2)daunorubicin for 3 days in combination with standard dose Ara-C and 6-thioguanine given for induction and consolidation, followed by a prolonged monthly maintenance chemotherapy for a duration of at least 1 year. Further improvements in supportive care may help in delivering additional anti-leukaemic cytotoxicity. As a novel approach, non-myeloablative preparative regimens may open up the field of allogeneic transplantation for older patients with AML. Given that the actual median age in this disease is more than 60 years the management of older age AML remains as the major challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Büchner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-str. 33, Münster, D-48129, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Berdel W, Wörmann B, Löffler H, Schoch C, Haferlach T, Ludwig WD, Maschmeyer G, Staib P, Andreesen R, Balleisen L, Haase D, Eimermacher H, Aul C, Rasche H, Uhlig J, Grüneisen A, Reis HE, Hartlapp J, Hirschmann WD, Weh HJ, Pielken HJ, Gassmann W, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A. Remission induction therapy: the more intensive the better? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001; 48 Suppl 1:S41-4. [PMID: 11587366 DOI: 10.1007/s002800100305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Intensive induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as in some other systemic malignancies is a strategy fundamentally different from post-remission strategies. Approaches such as consolidation treatment, prolonged maintenance, and autologous or allogeneic transplantation in first remission are directed against the minimal residual disease in which a malignant cell population has survived induction treatment and shows resistance due to special genetic or kinetic features. In contrast, induction therapy deals with naive tumor cells possibly different from their counterparts in remission in terms of their kinetic status and sensitivity. Therefore, in AML the introduction of intensification strategies into the induction phase of treatment has been suggested as a new step in addition to intensification in the postremission phase. As expected from the dose effects observed in post-remission treatment with high-dose cytarabine (AraC) or longer treatment, similar dose effects have been found in induction treatment both from the incorporation of high-dose AraC and from the double-induction strategy used in patients up to 60 years of age. As a particular effect, patients with poor-risk AML according to an unfavorable karyotype, high LDH in serum, or a delayed response show longer survival following double induction containing high-dose AraC as compared to standard-dose AraC. A corresponding dose effect in the induction treatment of patients aged 60 years and older has been found with daunorubicin 60 vs 30 mg/m2 as part of the thioguanine/ AraC/daunorubicin (TAD) regimen with the higher dosage significantly increasing the response rate and survival in these older patients who represent a poor-risk group as a whole. Thus we have been able to demonstrate both in younger and older patients that a poor prognosis can be improved by a more intensive induction therapy. High-dose AraC in induction, however, exhibits cumulative toxicity in that repeated courses containing high-dose AraC in the post-remission period lead to long-lasting aplasias of about 6 weeks. Thus after intensive induction treatment, high-dose chemotherapy in remission may be practicable using stem-cell rescue and may contribute to a further improvement in the outcome in poor-risk as well as average-risk patients with AML. These approaches are currently under investigation by the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG). "The more intensive the better" is certainly not the way to go in the management of AML and other systemic malignancies but some increase in intensity may be possible and better.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Büchner
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schoch C, Haferlach T, Haase D, Fonatsch C, Löffler H, Schlegelberger B, Staib P, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Büchner T, Hiddemann W. Patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia and complex karyotype aberrations show a poor prognosis despite intensive treatment: a study of 90 patients. Br J Haematol 2001; 112:118-26. [PMID: 11167792 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02511.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The clinical significance of complex chromosome aberrations for adults with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) was assessed in 920 patients with de novo AML who were karyotyped and treated within the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) trials. Complex chromosome aberrations were defined as three or more numerical and/or structural chromosome aberrations excluding translocations t(8;21)(q22;q22), t(15;17)(q22;q11-q12) and inv(16)(p13q22). Complex chromosome anomalies were detected in 10% of all cases with a significantly higher incidence in patients > or = 60 years of age (17.8% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.0001). Clinical follow-up data were available for 90 patients. Forty-five patients were < 60 years of age and were randomly assigned to double induction therapy with either TAD-TAD [thioguanine, daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside (AraC)] or TAD-HAM (high-dose AraC, mitoxantrone). Twenty-one patients achieved complete remission (CR) (47%), 20 patients (44%) were non-responders and 9% of patients died during aplasia (early death). The median overall survival (OS) was 7 months and the OS rate at 3 years was 12%. Patients receiving TAD-HAM showed a significantly higher CR rate than patients receiving TAD-TAD (56% vs. 23%, P = 0.04). Median event-free survival was less than 1 month in the TAD-TAD group and 2 months in the TAD-HAM group, respectively (P = 0.04), with a median OS of 4.5 months vs. 7.6 months (P = 0.13) and an OS after 3 years of 7.6% vs. 19.6%. Forty-five patients were > or = 60 years of age: 28 of these patient were treated for induction using one or two TAD courses and 17 cases received TAD-HAM with an age-adjusted reduction of the AraC dose. The CR rate was 44%, 38% were non-responders and 18% experienced early death. The median OS was 8 months and the OS rate at 3 years was 6%. In conclusion, complex chromosome aberrations in de novo AML predicted a dismal outcome, even when patients were treated with intensive chemotherapy. Patients under the age of 60 years with complex aberrant karyotypes may benefit from HAM treatment during induction. However, long-term survival rates are low and alternative treatment strategies for remission induction and consolidation are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schoch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Wörmann B, Löffler H, Ludwig WD, Schoch C, Haferlach T, Maschmeyer G, Staib P, Aul C, Heyll GA, Grüneisen A, Rasche H, Eimermacher JH, Balleisen L, Pielken HJ, Reis HE, Griesinger F, Reichle A, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A. Acute myeloid leukemia in adults: is postconsolidation maintenance therapy necessary? Int J Hematol 2000; 72:285-9. [PMID: 11185983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
Maintenance treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission has recently been controversially discussed and even abandoned by several groups. An analysis of 14 recently published multicenter trials, however, revealed the highest probabilities of relapse-free survival (RFS), in the range of 35% to 42% at 4 to 5 years, only in patients assigned to maintenance treatment as far as adult age and intent-to-treat conditions were considered. After having demonstrated a superior RFS rate from 3 years of maintenance after standard-dose consolidation compared with that from consolidation alone (P = .00004), the German AMLCG requestioned the effect of maintenance randomly compared with sequential high-dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) and mitoxantrone in patients who received intensified induction treatment. The results show an advantage for maintenance treatment (RFS rate of 32%) versus the sequential Ara-C and mitoxantrone treatment (RFS rate of 25%) (P = .021). We conclude that maintenance treatment continues to substantially contribute to the management of adult patients with AML, even as part of recent strategies using intensified induction treatment, and thus appears necessary in these settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Büchner
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lengfelder E, Reichert A, Schoch C, Haase D, Haferlach T, Löffler H, Staib P, Heyll A, Seifarth W, Saussele S, Fonatsch C, Gassmann W, Ludwig WD, Hochhaus A, Beelen D, Aul C, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Hehlmann R, Wörmann B, Hiddemann W, Büchner T. Double induction strategy including high dose cytarabine in combination with all-trans retinoic acid: effects in patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. German AML Cooperative Group. Leukemia 2000; 14:1362-70. [PMID: 10942230 DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
A prospective multicenter study was performed to investigate the clinical and molecular results of intensified double induction therapy including high-dose cytarabine (ara-C) in combination with ATRA in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), followed by consolidation and 3 years maintenance therapy. Fifty-one patients, diagnosed and monitored from December 1994 to June 1999, were evaluated. The median age was 43 (16-60) years. The morphologic diagnosis was M3 in 40 (78%) and M3v in 11 (22%) patients. In 15 (30%) patients the initial white blood cell counts were > or =5 x 10(9)/l. The cytogenetic or molecular proof of the translocation t(15;17) was a mandatory prerequisite for eligibility. The diagnosis was confirmed by karyotyping in 46 and by RT-PCR of the PML/RARalpha transcript in 45 cases. The rate of complete hematological remission was 92% and the early death rate 8%. Monitoring of minimal residual disease by RT-PCR of PML/RARalpha (sensitivity 10(-4)) showed negativity in 29 of 32 (91%) evaluable cases after induction, in 23 of 25 (92%) after consolidation, and in 27 of 30 (90%) during maintenance, after a median time of 2, 4 and of 18 months after diagnosis, respectively. After a median follow-up of 27 months, the estimated actuarial 2 years overall and event-free survival were both 88% (79, 97), and the 2 years relapse-free survival 96% (90, 100). The high antileukemic efficacy of this treatment strategy is demonstrated by a rapid and extensive reduction of the malignant clone and by a low relapse rate. The results suggest that the intensity of the induction chemotherapy combined with ATRA is one of the factors which may have a critical influence on the outcome of APL. A randomized trial should assess the value of an induction therapy including ATRA and high-dose ara-C in comparison to standard-dose ara-C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Lengfelder
- III. Medizinische Klinik Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Wörmann B, Löffler H, Gassmann W, Haferlach T, Fonatsch C, Haase D, Schoch C, Hossfeld D, Lengfelder E, Aul C, Heyll A, Maschmeyer G, Ludwig WD, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A. Double induction strategy for acute myeloid leukemia: the effect of high-dose cytarabine with mitoxantrone instead of standard-dose cytarabine with daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine: a randomized trial by the German AML Cooperative Group. Blood 1999; 93:4116-24. [PMID: 10361108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Early intensification of chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine either in the postremission or remission induction phase has recently been shown to improve long-term relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Comparable results have been produced with the double induction strategy. The present trial evaluated the contribution of high-dose versus standard-dose cytarabine to this strategy. Between March 1985 and November 1992, 725 eligible patients 16 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed primary AML entered the trial. Before treatment started, patients were randomized between two versions of double induction: 2 courses of standard-dose cytarabine (ara-C) with daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine (TAD) were compared with 1 course of TAD followed by high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 every 12 hours for 6 times) with mitoxantrone (HAM). Second courses started on day 21 before remission criteria were reached, regardless of the presence or absence of blast cells in the bone marrow. Patients in remission received consolidation by TAD and monthly maintenance with reduced TAD courses for 3 years. The complete remission (CR) rate in the TAD-TAD compared with the TAD-HAM arm was 65% versus 71% (not significant [NS]), and the early and hypoplastic death rate was 18% versus 14% (NS). The corresponding RFS after 5 years was 29% versus 35% (NS). An explorative analysis identified a subgroup of 286 patients with a poor prognosis representing 39% of the entire population; they included patients with more than 40% residual blasts in the day-16 bone marrow, patients with unfavorable karyotype, and those with high levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase. Their CR rate was 65% versus 49% (p =.004) in favor of TAD-HAM and was associated with a superior event-free survival (median, 7 v 3 months; 5 years, 17% v 12%; P =.012) and overall survival (median, 13 v 8 months; 5 years, 24% v 18%; P =.009). This suggests that the incorporation of high-dose cytarabine with mitoxantrone may contribute a specific benefit to poor-risk patients that, however, requires further substantiation. Double induction, followed by consolidation and maintenance, proved a safe and effective strategy and a new way of delivering early intensification treatment for AML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Büchner
- Departments of Hematology/Oncology and of Biostatistics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schoch C, Haase D, Fonatsch C, Haferlach T, Löffler H, Schlegelberger B, Hossfeld DK, Becher R, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Wörmann B, Büchner T, Hiddemann W. The significance of trisomy 8 in de novo acute myeloid leukaemia: the accompanying chromosome aberrations determine the prognosis. German AML Cooperative Study Group. Br J Haematol 1997; 99:605-11. [PMID: 9401073 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.4473257.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Trisomy 8 is the most frequent numerical chromosome aberration in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). It occurs either as the sole anomaly or together with other clonal chromosome aberrations. We investigated whether accompanying chromosome anomalies influence the clinical outcome in patients with trisomy 8 and de novo AML. Since 1986, in 713 AML cases treated according to the protocols of the German AMLCG trials, chromosome analyses have been successfully performed. The overall incidence of trisomy 8 was 7.6%. Complete clinical follow-up data were available for 51 patients who were divided into three different categories: group 1: trisomy 8 as the sole cytogenetic anomaly (n = 20); group 2: trisomy 8 in addition to favourable chromosome aberrations (t(8;21)(q22;q22), t(15;17)(q22;q21), inv(16)(p13q22)) (n = 10); and group 3: trisomy 8 accompanied by other anomalies, in most cases of complex type (n = 21). Complete remission (CR) rates were 70%, 90% and 67% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years differed significantly between patients with trisomy 8 only (37.5%), patients with trisomy 8 in combination with favourable aberrations (55.0%) and patients with trisomy 8 and other accompanying anomalies, mostly complex chromosome aberrations (9.0%) (group 1 v group 2: P=0.12; group 1 v group 3: P=0.005; group 2 v group 3: P=0.05). In this study patients with +8 as the sole cytogenetic anomaly had an intermediate prognosis, patients with +8 in addition to favourable chromosome aberrations maintained a good clinical outcome, and patients with +8 in combination with other abnormalities showed the worst prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schoch
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, University of Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Wörmann B, Zühlsdorf M, Rottmann R, Innig G, Maschmeier G, Ludwig WD, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A. Hematopoietic growth factors in acute myeloid leukemia: supportive and priming effects. Semin Oncol 1997; 24:124-31. [PMID: 9045298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Hematopoietic growth factors (GFs) are administered to patients who have acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in order to overcome two limitations of chemotherapy: (I) myelotoxicity, and (2) the chemoresistance of minimal residual disease. GFs have been used after chemotherapy in 11 clinical studies, 8 on older age or otherwise high-risk AML. The GFs used were granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in 7, G-CSF in three and macrophage-CSF in one of the studies. Beneficial effects could be shown on the duration of neutropenia in 8 studies, frequency of infections or fever in 4 studies, mortality or survival in 2 studies and remission rate in 1 study. The benefits in remissions and survival were all found among high-risk patients. One study in younger patients found disadvantages in the remission rate and event-free survival, whereas there was no adverse effect of GF on therapy resistance, leukemic regrowth, or disease-free survival in the other studies. GF priming strategies are based on their stimulation of AML blasts in vitro, their modulation of cellular cytarabine (ARA-C) metabolism and enhancement of clonogenic cell kill by ARA-C. Protective effects of GF against clonogenic cell kill or apoptosis were also described. There are data from 10 clinical studies using GFs before or simultaneously with chemotherapy. One study showed significance, two others a tendency to longer disease-free survival, and two studies showed a trend toward more remissions. A disadvantage in the remission rate and survival was found in one study and prolonged thrombocytopenia in two studies. Nine of ten studies did not find evidence for an adverse effect of GF priming on the course of the disease. In most studies, GF priming was only administered in one or two chemotherapy courses. One study giving four to five courses found a reduction in relapses during the first 6 months. In conclusion, a supportive use of GF may have a place in high-risk, but not standard-risk AML. GF priming approaches may not have been adequately investigated and an extension of this strategy to more treatment courses now appears more promising. Based on the clinical data available, all administration of GF in AML should be regarded as investigational.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Büchner
- University of Münster Medical Center, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Haferlach T, Bennett JM, Löffler H, Gassmann W, Andersen JW, Tuzuner N, Casslleth PA, Fonatsch C, Schoch C, Schlegelberger B, Becher R, Thiel E, Ludwig WD, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Büchner T. Acute myeloid leukemia with translocation (8;21). Cytomorphology, dysplasia and prognostic factors in 41 cases. AML Cooperative Group and ECOG. Leuk Lymphoma 1996; 23:227-34. [PMID: 9031103 DOI: 10.3109/10428199609054825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The translocation t(8;21) is one of the most common structural aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Excellent response rates and a better relapse-free survival have been described. We analyzed specific morphologic and cytochemical features including dysplasia and other prognostic factors in 41 patients with AML and t(8;21) who underwent aggressive chemotherapy in two national cooperative group studies. Five patients were classified as AML M1 and 36 as AML M2 according to the FAB criteria. Auer rods were detected in 28 patients (68%), however in only 16 patients were they "thin and elongated" as has been described as typical for t(8;21). The presence or absence of Auer rods did not appear to be associated with disease-free survival in this sample. Dysgranulopoiesis was detected in 31/41 patients (90%); five of these patients additionally had dyserythropoiesis (12%). In six cases (15%), dysmegakaryopoiesis was seen in combination with dysgranulopoiesis. Only one patient had trilineage dysplasia. Dysplastic features had no influence on prognosis. Additional cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in 24/41 patients. Twelve male (48%) and four female (25%) had a loss of a sex chromosome. This was correlated with a better disease-free survival (p = 0.039). The complete remission rate (CR) to chemotherapy was 90%. The early death rate was 10%. Disease-free survival of the complete responders was 60% at two years with no relapses observed in ten patients with 2-6 years of follow up. This favorable disease-free survival was observed with a variety of post-induction regimens and t(8;21) had been detected as an independent factor for good prognosis. The need for very intensive therapy, such as bone marrow transplantation, is unanswered at this time.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Female
- Humans
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Precancerous Conditions/drug therapy
- Precancerous Conditions/genetics
- Precancerous Conditions/pathology
- Prognosis
- Prospective Studies
- Translocation, Genetic
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Haferlach
- University of Kiel, Second Medical Department, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schoch C, Haase D, Haferlach T, Gudat H, Büchner T, Freund M, Link H, Lengfelder E, Wandt H, Sauerland MC, Löffler H, Fonatsch C. Fifty-one patients with acute myeloid leukemia and translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22): an additional deletion in 9q is an adverse prognostic factor. Leukemia 1996; 10:1288-95. [PMID: 8709633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22) occurs in 6 to 12 percent of patients with AML, and usually predicts a good response to chemotherapy with a high remission rate and a relatively long median survival. The influence of additional chromosome aberrations on the clinical outcome of patients with t(8;21) is unclear. We analyzed 51 cases of acute myeloid leukemia carrying a translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22); 23 female and 28 male patients. The complete remission rate was 92 percent and median overall survival was 52.4 months. The median overall survival of female patients was significantly worse than of male patients (37.2 months vs not reached, P = 0.025). Additional chromosome aberrations were detected in 41 patients at diagnosis (80 percent), 31 (61 percent) had lost a sex chromosome, seven (14 percent) showed a partial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 9 and in three patients (6 percent) a gain of chromosome 8 was observed. Whereas the loss of a sex chromosome had no influence on prognosis, a partial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 9 was an unfavorable prognostic factor. The median overall survival of the seven patients with del(9q) was only 12.5 months and thus significantly shorter than in patients with only t(8;21) or with t(8;21) and additional sex chromosome loss (median survival not reached: P = 0.0010).
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Acute Disease
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Cause of Death
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- Chromosome Aberrations
- Chromosome Banding
- Chromosome Deletion
- Chromosome Mapping
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Karyotyping
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Prognosis
- Recurrence
- Sex Characteristics
- Sex Chromosome Aberrations
- Survival Rate
- Translocation, Genetic
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schoch
- AG Tumorcytogenetik, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Köpcke W, Sauerland MC. Meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability data on iron proteinsuccinylate in patients with iron deficiency anemia of different severity. Arzneimittelforschung 1995; 45:1211-1216. [PMID: 8929242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Iron proteinsuccinylate (ITF 282, CAS 93615-44-2) is an iron derivative for the oral treatment of iron deficiency anemia. Its efficacy and tolerability have been proved in about 1800 patients, enrolled in 3 multicenter clinical trials. The first aim of this meta-analysis is to verify the increase of hemoglobin (Hb) in these patients (891 treated with ITF282, 644 treated with iron sulphate and 236 treated with iron-polysterene sulphonate). The 3 studies show homogeneous Hb increases. ITF 282 appeared to provide, from time 0 to the 30th day of treatment, a similar or lesser increase in Hb in comparison to the reference drugs, while from the 30th day of treatment to the 60th day its efficacy was always greater than that of the reference medications. The data have been further analyzed by subdividing the patients in three classes, according to the severity of the anemia: basal Hb < or = 9 g/dl, > 9 < or = 11 g/dl, > g/dl. During the 60-day treatment, both ITF 282 and the reference drugs induced the most significant increase in Hb in the patients affected by the most severe anemia. The meta-analytic evaluation of the 3 trials results has been extended to tolerability data. Most side effects were related to the gastrointestinal tract. Their incidence resulted signficantly lower for ITF 282 than that for the reference drugs (9.4% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.01). The comparative sub-analysis of the side effect distribution into the patients populations shows that ITF 282 is definitely better tolerated in pregnant women (relative risk 0.321, p < 0.01). The time course of Hb increases and the tolerability data suggest a different mechanism by which ITF 282 and the reference drugs are effective. Since the main difference between ITF 282 and the reference drugs is the form in which the iron is presented to the gastrointestinal mucosa, it may be supposed that the reference drugs, providing free divalent iron ions for absorption, could induce some kind of irritative condition of the gastrointestinal mucosa, which results in a reduced long-term absorption capacity, as well as in a higher incidence of gastroenteric adverse events. ITF 282, providing protein-bound iron, would not permit the process supposed with divalent iron, thus resulting in prolonged absorption capacity (that is higher hemoglobin recovery) and higher gastrointestinal tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Köpcke
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik und Biomathematik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Heinecke A, Sauerland MC, Büchner T. Predictive models for achievement of complete remission and duration of first remission in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Haematol Blood Transfus 1990; 33:285-9. [PMID: 2182422 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-74643-7_51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Achievement of CR. Using the data of 501 patients treated identically with the TAD9 regimen we could not find any factor of predictive value besides age and state of health. The effect of FAB-M seems to be spurious as it disappeared using prospective data. Duration of Relapse-Free Survival. In patients with monthly maintenance, the maintenance overrides the possible effects of the considered factors. In patients without monthly maintenance we only found a slight effect of WBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Heinecke
- Dept. of Medical Biostatistics, University of Münster, FRG
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Heinecke A, Sauerland MC, Büchner T. Sequential decision strategy of the AML Cooperative Group studies. Haematol Blood Transfus 1990; 33:290-4. [PMID: 2182423 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-74643-7_52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The ongoing 1985 studies are showing at present no clear advantage for either therapy. In the 1981 study, randomization was terminated by the sequential procedure after 161 randomizations. A test with the same alpha and beta but fixed sample size would have required at least 200 patients, 100 for each therapy. So in this case the use of the sequential procedure saved about 40 randomizations.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Decision Making, Organizational
- Germany, West/epidemiology
- Humans
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality
- Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Acute/drug therapy
- Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Acute/mortality
- Life Tables
- Middle Aged
- Multicenter Studies as Topic
- Proportional Hazards Models
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Survival Analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Heinecke
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, University of Münster, FRG
| | | | | |
Collapse
|