Health Care for Youth With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities: A Consensus Statement

Individuals with a neurodevelopmental disability (NDD) face significant health care barriers, disparities in health outcomes, and high rates of foregone and adverse health care experiences. The Supporting Access for Everyone (SAFE) Initiative was developed to establish principles of health care to improve equity for youth with NDDs through an evidence-informed and consensus-derived process. With the Developmental Behavioral Pediatric Research Network, the SAFE cochairs convened a consensus panel composed of diverse professionals, caregivers, and adults with NDDs who contributed their varied expertise related to SAFE care delivery. A 2-day public forum (attended by consensus panel members) was convened where professionals, community advocates, and adults with NDDs and/or caregivers of individuals with NDDs presented research, clinical strategies, and personal experiences. After this, a 2-day consensus conference was held. Using nominal group technique, the panel derived a consensus statement (CS) on SAFE care, an NDD Health Care Bill of Rights, and Transition Considerations. Ten CSs across 5 topical domains were established: (1) training, (2) communication, (3) access and planning, (4) diversity, equity, inclusion, belonging, and anti-ableism, and (5) policy and structural change. Relevant and representative citations were added when available to support the derived statements. The final CS was approved by all consensus panel members and the Developmental Behavioral Pediatric Research Network steering committee. At the heart of this CS is an affirmation that all people are entitled to health care that is accessible, humane, and effective.

Challenging Case: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Demystifying Chronic Sleep Impairment in an Infant with a Complex Medical and Behavioral Profile

CASE

X is a 22-month-old White male infant with a complex medical history, including diagnoses of FBXO11 mutation, hypotonia, restrictive lung disease and mild intermittent asthma, laryngotracheomalacia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), feeding difficulties with a history of aspiration, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and developmental delays. X's medical presentation has resulted in multiple prior medical admissions for respiratory failure due to acute illnesses, procedures and treatments including gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tube dependence, supraglottoplasty to reshape tissues of the upper larynx, and the use of biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) at night and room air during the day when he is at baseline. In addition, he has nocturnal events characterized by significant agitation, screaming, crying, body stiffening and limb movements with pauses in breathing, mouth breathing, restless sleep, and difficulty waking in the morning with concomitant daytime fatigue despite above treatments for OSA. There is no history of congenital heart disease or sudden unexplained death. Family history is noncontributory because parents are negative for the FBXO11 variant.X's sleep disruption has led to significant sleep deficits for both X and his caregivers, who spend much of the night strategizing on how to console him. X has undergone several sleep studies, starting when X was aged 4 months, at several children's hospitals across the nation to determine the cause of his chronic sleep disturbance, which yielded limited information and treatment success. As an infant, X received a medical workup and was subsequently treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for reflux. At 12 months, he was diagnosed with disordered sleep with myoclonic jerks and started on melatonin and gabapentin for involuntary movements. At 13 months, gabapentin was weaned back because of intolerance, and at 15 months, nortriptyline and clonidine were started because of worsening symptoms to target potential neuropathic pain. While most of his symptoms were at night, he had occasional daytime screaming episodes, particularly when experiencing illness. Gabapentin and clonidine were stopped because nortriptyline seemed most effective.At 17 months, the results from a sleep study led to a diagnosis of night terrors, and several clinicians agreed that X's sleep disruption was behavioral in nature. At this time, an infant mental health consultant met with a sleep psychologist on the family's behalf to support family in considering systematic desensitization therapy to increase tolerance to wearing his BiPAP mask, as well as other behavioral and sleep hygiene strategies, which were tried on several occasions and again, resulted in limited improvement in functioning.At 19 months, X's multidisciplinary team reconsidered a night terror diagnosis after a failed trial of clonazepam and pursued a differential diagnosis of periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD). X trialed gabapentin again, but this time only a nighttime dose, per sleep medicine and psychiatry recommendation. While this brought some temporary relief from nighttime distress, despite increasing to the highest dose for age and weight (15 mg/kg/dose), this became less effective, and he was weaned off at 22 months. He had been on iron supplementation since age 6 months and received an iron infusion at 22 months because of persistently low ferritin levels and PLMD in sleep.At 24 months, X was briefly trialed on levetiracetam. While no evidence for seizures on EEG was present, this medication was chosen for involuntary movements and genetic risk for seizures. However, this medication was not useful. At 25 months, an evaluation with a movement disorder physiatrist resulted in a diagnosis of nocturnal paroxysmal dystonia, and he was started on baclofen, which has provided some, but not complete relief to nighttime symptoms. Parents are reporting he has more "good nights" than "bad nights," but "bad nights" come in stretches of a few days in length with no known trigger or relief.Most recently, X was evaluated by general genetics. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was pursued which revealed a pathogenic de novo variant in FBXO11 and provides a likely cause for his neurodevelopmental phenotype. However, he has some features not explained by FBX011; thus, reanalysis of his WES was performed and revealed a de novo variant of uncertain significance in RAF1. Because pathogenic variants in RAF1 have been associated with dilated cardiomyopathy and Noonan spectrum disorder, it was recommended that X be followed periodically in a cardiac genetics clinic. Family is well connected into the FBXO11 community, including supportive Facebook groups. Parents have shared that they do not feel X's breathing issues and pain fit with the phenotype of other children with FBXO11 mutations.X is also enrolled in a medical child care program to facilitate development and social-emotional functioning and receives learning, speech, occupational, physical, and feeding therapy while in attendance. Despite periods of absence due to contracting numerous viral illnesses over the past several months, X continues to make progress across developmental therapies and happily engages when at the program.What additional diagnostic tests and treatment should be considered to better understand X's medical and behavioral presentation? What are the implications of chronic sleep deprivation and stress on the behavior and development of infant with X's profile? What are important psychosocial considerations because it relates to children with medical complexity (CMC), particularly for X and his family to support caregiver, family, and X's quality of life and overall well-being?

Using normalization process theory to inform practice: evaluation of a virtual autism training for clinicians

Background

There is growing demand for developmental and behavioral pediatric services including autism evaluation and care management. Clinician trainings have been found to result in an increase of knowledge and attitudes. This study utilizes Normalization Process theory (NPT) to evaluate a clinician training program and its effects on practice.

Methods

The year-long virtual training program about autism screening and care management included didactic portions and case presentations. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with primary care clinicians (n = 10) from community health centers (n = 6) across an urban area five months post-training. Transcripts were deductively coded using NPT to uncover barriers to implementation of autism screening and care, benefits of the training program, and areas for future training.

Results

Participants were motivated by the benefits of expanding and improving support for autistic patients but noted this effort requires effective collaboration within a complex network of care providers including clinicians, insurance agencies, and therapy providers. Although there were support that participants could provide to families there were still barriers including availability of behavior therapy and insufficient staffing. Overall, participants positively viewed the training and reported implementing new strategies into practice.

Conclusion

Despite the small sample size, application of NPT allowed for assessment of both training delivery and implementation of strategies, and identification of recommendations for future training and practice sustainability. Follow-up focus groups explored participants' practice five months post-program. Variations in participants' baseline experience and context at follow-up to enable application of skills should be considered when using NPT to evaluate clinician trainings.

Complex Autism Spectrum Disorder: Structural Determinants of Health and Their Impact on the Diagnosis

CASE

Emmanuel is a 6.5-year-old boy who was referred to your evaluation clinic for concerns about his social skills and communication. He arrived in the United States (US) 1 year ago after an immigration trajectory that began in Haiti when he was aged 3 years; passed through Mexico, where the family was in various shelters for over a year; and concluded 2 years later, with the family eventually settling in an urban center in the northeastern United States. While in Mexico, the family was living in a camp without access to utilities. They faced significant food insecurity and experienced multiple relocations because of fears of physical safety.Emmanuel's native language is Haitian Creole, but he learned some Spanish during the year spent in Mexico. Now in the United States, he has been enrolled for the last year in the public school system, where he participates in an inclusion English as a Second Language kindergarten classroom. The school has expressed concern about several behaviors including bolting from the classroom, shouting out inappropriately, and taking food from other children's lunches.On initial meeting with a DBP clinician, Emmanuel's parents report that they do not have any concerns at home about his behavior, although they do feel that he "talks less than his 3 older siblings." The 6-person household is currently living in one-room, temporary housing; they deny current food insecurity.As part of his evaluation, you perform an Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale-2 Module 3 in English with the support of an in-person Haitian Creole interpreter. Emmanuel does not make eye contact throughout the evaluation but does respond to your questions in a combination of English and Haitian Creole. He can define the concept of a "friend" but cannot name one of his own friends. He is not able to engage in the demonstration task with words but does use gestures to indicate the actions involved in brushing teeth. His free play is perseverative and centers around fighting between the action figures.Brief cognitive testing reveals normal nonverbal intelligence. He is unable to decode in English on achievement testing. The family completes a Social Responsiveness Scale in English, which shows normal scores except in the repetitive behaviors section, where the family endorses pacing and some restricted interests, particularly around video games.He is not yet on an Individualized Education Plan, and there have been no formal assessments from the school except for language dominance testing indicating that his dominant language is Haitian Creole, with emerging English skills. What specific topics are unique to the evaluation for autism in an English language learner with a significant trauma history? What factors should be considered when assessing a child with a history of immigration trauma?

Effect of Family Navigation on Participation in Part C Early Intervention

OBJECTIVE

Part C Early Intervention (EI) services have been shown to reduce autism symptoms and promote healthy development among young children. However, EI participation remains low, particularly among children from structurally marginalized communities. We investigated whether family navigation (FN) improved EI initiation following positive primary care screening for autism compared to conventional care management (CCM).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized clinical trial among 339 families of children (ages 15-27 months) who screened as having an increased likelihood for autism at 11 urban primary care sites in 3 cities. Families were randomized to FN or CCM. Families in the FN arm received community-based outreach from a navigator trained to support families to overcome structural barriers to autism evaluation and services. EI service records were obtained from state or local agencies. The primary outcome of this study, EI service participation, was measured as the number of days from randomization to the first EI appointment.

RESULTS

EI service records were available for 271 children; 156 (57.6%) children were not engaged with EI at study enrollment. Children were followed for 100 days after diagnostic ascertainment or until age 3, when Part C EI eligibility ends; 65 (89%, 21 censored) children in the FN arm and 50 (79%, 13 censored) children in the CCM arm were newly engaged in EI. In Cox proportional hazards regression, families receiving FN were approximately 54% more likely to engage EI than those receiving CCM (1.54 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-2.19), P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

FN improved the likelihood of EI participation among urban families from marginalized communities.

Hyperphagia and Down Syndrome

CASE

A.Z. is a 14-year-old young boy with Down syndrome and intellectual disability. As a baby and toddler, A.Z. struggled with swallowing dysfunction and recurrent aspiration, which improved by the time he was school aged. At the age of 2 years, his body mass index (BMI) was 95.98% (Z score 1.75). During his early school-age years, A.Z. began eating a wider variety of foods. As he grew taller and remained active, his BMI improved briefly during this time. Between ages 10 and 12 years, concerns regarding increased appetite and excessive weight gain emerged. His BMI increased from 82.56% (Z score 0.94) to 98.27% (Z score 2.11) during this time. He became insatiable; he ate when he was happy, upset, or bored. He had a compulsive need to eat all day, which escalated while staying home during the COVID pandemic. Despite having complete meals and a variety of snacks, he overate and sought out food and snacks, no matter the time of the day. Food also became a source of contention and a trigger for verbally and physically aggressive behavior when parents attempted to restrict food intake. Behavioral therapy was recommended to address his eating patterns as a part of his behavioral management plan.Over time, many strategies were used, including a token economy reward system, setting firm limits around snacking and meals, creating a food schedule with times and forced choice options, use of coping skill training, a feelings thermometer, and communication supports. These interventions had moderate intermittent success; however, overeating and consequent power struggles continued to be the major challenge reported by the family.He was started on a long-acting stimulant medication daily, intended to address impulsive and aggressive behaviors, and with potential benefit of appetite reduction. However, although there were some improvements in behavior, there was little to no effect noted on his appetite. Of note, he was diagnosed with celiac disease and severe obstructive sleep apnea at this time. A.Z. remained compliant with his gluten-free diet despite the challenges he experienced with food seeking and portion control. Overall, despite making excellent progress in behavioral regulation and performing particularly well in structured settings outside the home (i.e., school or summer camp), A.Z. continued to binge eat and seek out food with his most recent BMI at 98.62% (Z score 2.20).CASE 2: C.J. is a 9-year-old boy with Down syndrome and intellectual disability. As a toddler, C.J. had a brief period of time in which he was noted to overeat or not sense when he was full and subsequently gag or vomit after meals. At age 5 to 6 years, C.J. began demonstrating a more voracious appetite and increased weight gain; his BMI was 99.43% (Z score 2.53). Behavioral strategies, such as food schedules with forced choice options, were recommended. C.J. responded with increased dysregulation to the limit setting. An additional trigger for C.J. was the irregular visitation schedule with his father. He also hid and hoarded food; for example, he often ate food and hid the wrappers in the trash. Locking the refrigerator and cabinets results in binging on whatever he could find, such as ketchup packets. If C.J. wanted food during a time outside of his schedule, he was provided a list of alternative activities to choose from. It was recommended that his parent portion foods for him and set clear expectations of eating in the kitchen alone.C.J. was trialed on a short-acting alpha-agonist agent for 1 year to help address some of his behavioral challenges. Despite initial improvement on this regimen, behavioral challenges reemerged, and his eating behaviors worsened, so the medication was stopped. After stopping the medication, C.J. responded well to the limit setting, including regulating his own portion sizes and using a portion control plate. The family believed that the short-acting alpha-agonist worsened his food-seeking behaviors, although this was not clinically apparent. Despite having continued affinity for certain foods and snacks, C.J. was no longer binge eating or hoarding and hiding food. His most recent BMI remained elevated at 99.24% (Z score 2.43).

Developmentally-Trained Primary Care Clinicians: A Pipeline to Improved Access?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to decrease wait time and improve access to developmental-behavioral pediatric (DBP) evaluation in children 4 years of age and younger as part of a quality improvement (QI) initiative in an urban safety-net hospital.

METHODS

A primary care pediatrician received DBP minifellowship training 6 hours per week for 1 year to become a developmentally-trained primary care clinician (DT-PCC). DT-PCCs then conducted developmental evaluations that consisted of using a Childhood Autism Rating Scale and Brief Observation of Symptoms of Autism to evaluate children 4 years and younger referred within the practice. Baseline standard practice involved a 3-visit model: DBP advanced practice clinician (DBP-APC) intake visit, neurodevelopmental evaluation by a developmental-behavioral pediatrician (DBP), and feedback by a developmental-behavioral pediatrician. Two QI cycles were completed to streamline the referral and evaluation process.

RESULTS

Seventy patients with a mean age of 29.5 months were seen. The average days to initial developmental assessment decreased from 135.3 days to 67.9 days with a streamlined referral to the DT-PCC. Of the 43 patients who required further evaluation by a DBP, the average days to developmental assessment reduced from 290.1 to 120.4 days.

CONCLUSION

Developmentally-trained primary care clinicians allowed for earlier access to developmental evaluations. Further research should explore how DT-PCCs can improve access to care and treatment for children with developmental delays.

Is My Child Racist? Supporting Caregivers in Conceptualizing Race for Children

CASE

M is a 4-year-old White girl whose parents contact their primary care pediatric clinician with a behavioral concern: over the course of several months, M has insisted that she is pregnant with quintuplets. Although some of the quintuplets have light skin tones, others have darker skin tones. When elaborating about the fantasy, M often explains that the babies fight in her tummy, and the Brown babies are "acting badly" by spitting, scratching, and hitting the others. Although M can sometimes provide an explanation for why the Brown babies misbehaved (i.e., they ate chocolate), often she is not able to produce an answer. The child frequently reiterates the same story to her parents, which has left M's parents uncertain how to react.In terms of her life course thus far, M has had typical development and behavior. She has attended all her well-child visits and met the usual developmental milestones. Beyond general development, her exposure to diverse people has been ample because she is from a multiethnic household in which 2 languages are regularly spoken. Outside of her home, she has close Brown and Black friends in her preschool, and the school has discussed race and skin color in an affirming way with the children. At home, she has books that feature children of different skin tones.What advice can M's pediatric clinician offer? How can parents and pediatric clinicians support children who present with race-based thoughts or actions that seem discriminatory?

Independent and joint association of cord plasma pantothenate and cysteine levels with autism spectrum disorders and other neurodevelopmental disabilities in children born term and preterm

Background

Pantothenate (vitamin B5) is a precursor for coenzyme A (CoA) synthesis, which serves as a cofactor for hundreds of metabolic reactions. Cysteine is an amino acid in the CoA synthesis pathway. To date, research on the combined role of early life pantothenate and cysteine levels in childhood neurodevelopmental disabilities is scarce.

Objective

To study the association between cord pantothenate and cysteine levels and risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other developmental disabilities (DD) in children born term and preterm.

Methods

The study sample (n = 996, 177 born preterm) derived from the Boston Birth Cohort included 416 neurotypical children, 87 ASD, 269 ADHD, and 224 other DD children, who were mutually exclusive. Participants were enrolled at birth and were followed up prospectively (from October 1, 1998, to June 30, 2018) at the Boston Medical Center. Cord blood sample was collected at birth. Plasma pantothenate and cysteine levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Results

Higher cord pantothenate (≥50th percentile vs. <50th percentile) was associated with a greater risk of ASD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 3.55) and ADHD (aOR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.40), after adjusting for potential confounders. However, cord cysteine alone was not associated with risk of ASD, ADHD, or other DD. When considering the joint association, greater ASD risk was noted when both cord pantothenate and cysteine levels were elevated (≥50th percentile) (aOR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.24, 7.79), when compared to children with low cord pantothenate (<50th percentile) and high cysteine. Even though preterm and higher pantothenate independently increased the ASD risk, the greatest risk was found in preterm children who also had elevated pantothenate (≥50th percentile), which was true for all three outcomes: ASD (aOR: 5.36, 95% CI: 2.09, 13.75), ADHD (aOR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.78, 6.16), and other DD (aOR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.85, 6.24).

Conclusions

In this prospective birth cohort, we showed that higher cord pantothenate individually and in combination with higher cysteine or preterm birth were associated with increased risk of ASD and ADHD. More study is needed to explore this biologically plausible pathway.

Challenging Case: Leveraging Community Partnerships to Address Barriers to Care for Students with Autism

CASE

Sam is an 11-year-old young boy with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), unspecified anxiety disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, combined presentation. He was initially diagnosed with ASD at 6 years of age after evaluation by a developmental-behavioral (DB) pediatrician. He presents to the DB pediatrics clinic to reestablish care. He established care with psychiatry 5 months ago after his school referred him to a hospital-school-community telepartnership bridge program following statements of self-harm and numerous concerns with his behavior, including elopement.Sam currently receives special education support under the classifications of "Emotional Disturbance" and "Speech Impairment." His parents report significant challenges with having his medical diagnosis of autism recognized by the school, which has impeded him receiving educational support as a student with autism. This has resulted in Sam being penalized for challenging behaviors related to his neurodevelopmental disorder. He is not currently making meaningful progress in the school setting. Sam currently demonstrates avoidance, physical and verbal aggression, and difficulty adapting to change across settings. In addition to difficulties advocating for more individualized support at school, Sam has never received applied behavior analysis (ABA) therapy because of challenges obtaining insurance approval. There are no additional barriers to accessing care, such as language, geographic, or socioeconomic factors.Sam's visit to reestablish care with DB pediatrics consisted of an individual clinician evaluation model. The Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition, (CARS-2) and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3), were administered, and Sam continued to meet DSM-5 criteria for ASD following re-evaluation. A new referral for ABA therapy was submitted. Shortly afterward, his family received an insurance denial letter specifying that additional developmental testing was needed before ABA therapy would be approved. His clinician called the insurance company to appeal this decision but was unsuccessful. Sam was then seen by the DB pediatrics embedded psychologist, who completed additional testing, including assessment of cognitive functioning, administration of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2), and autism-specific rating scales. This process led to further delays in access to ABA services. Throughout this process, the parents reported feeling helpless and frustrated given the barriers faced in receiving appropriate services. What are your next steps to advocate for supports through the school and insurance company?

Lifetime Earning Potential and Workforce Distribution in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics

OBJECTIVES

Compare lifetime earning potential (LEP) for developmental and behavioral pediatrics (DBP) to general pediatrics and other pediatric subspecialties. Evaluate association between LEP for DBP and measures of workforce distribution.

METHODS

Using compensation and debt data from 2018 to 2019 and a net present value analysis, we estimated LEP for DBP compared to general pediatrics and other pediatric subspecialties. We evaluated potential effects of eliminating educational debt, shortening length of fellowship training, and implementing loan repayment or forgiveness programs for pediatric subspecialists. We evaluated the association between LEP for DBP and measures of workforce distribution, including distance to subspecialists, percentage of hospital referral regions (HRRs) with a subspecialist, ratio of subspecialists to regional child population, and fellowship fill rates.

RESULTS

LEP was lower for DBP than for general private practice pediatrics ($1.9 million less), general academic pediatrics ($1.1 million less), and all other pediatric subspecialties. LEP of DBP could be improved by shortening fellowship training or implementing loan repayment or forgiveness programs. LEP for subspecialists, including DBP, was associated with distance to subspecialists (-0.5 miles/$100,000 increase in LEP, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.98 to -0.08), percentage of HRRs with a subspecialist (+1.1%/$100,000 increase in LEP, 95% CI 0.37-1.83), ratio of subspecialists to regional child population (+0.1 subspecialists/100,000 children/$100,000 increase in LEP, 95% CI 0.04-0.17), and average 2014 to 2018 fellowship fill rates (+1% spots filled/$100,000 increase in LEP, 95% CI 0.25-1.65).

CONCLUSIONS

DBP has the lowest LEP of all pediatric fields and this is associated with DBP workforce shortages. Interventions to improve LEP may promote workforce growth.

Interoception in Practice: The Gut-Brain Connection

Tony is a five and a half-year-old boy who has been a patient in your primary care practice since he was adopted at birth. He has been treated by a child and adolescent psychiatrist for behavioral concerns starting at age 3 years and has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) combined type, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. He presents today with complaints of repeated emesis and refusal to eat or drink over the past 2 weeks and is now dehydrated. Tony was born at 30 weeks' gestational age by vaginal delivery with a birth weight of 4lbs 15oz and was described as minimally responsive at birth. There was known prenatal exposure to tobacco and methamphetamine and inadequate prenatal care. The maternal history is notable for a reported diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder, prostitution, and being unhoused at the time of delivery. Tony received antibiotics after delivery for presumed newborn infections. As an infant, he had kidney reflux, low serum ferritin, insomnia, and failure to thrive. Regarding developmental milestones, Tony was sitting up at 7 months, walking at 14 months, talking at 18 months, and speaking in full sentences by 24 months. When he presented to the psychiatric service at age 3 years, behavioral problems included irritability with destructive rages, excessive fears, separation anxiety, hyperactivity, and impulsivity with a lack of awareness of danger to the extent that he required a safety harness when in public and security locks in the home because of repeated elopements. Tony also had at the time of his initial presentation significant defiance, extreme tantrums, violent aggressive outbursts, cognitive rigidity, repetitive behaviors, resistance to change, frequent nondirected vocalizations, and self-injurious behaviors including slapping himself on the head and biting of his hands and feet. Review of systems includes complaints of frequent abdominal and neck pain, persistent insomnia, night terrors, restrictive eating habits with poor weight gain, and reduced sensitivity to pain. Treatment history included gabapentin and subsequently divalproex for seizure-like episodes (despite negative EEG) described as frequent staring spells with repetitive biting of his lips. Psychotropic medications were risperidone for irritability associated with autism and clonidine extended release for ADHD. He also took melatonin for sleep. During his well-child check at the age of 5 years, Tony is making good progress from a developmental standpoint, has age-appropriate expressive and receptive language skills, is fluent in both English and Spanish, is able to recite the alphabet, counts to 20, has learned to swim, and is demonstrating interest in planets and astrology. He is reported to have a secure attachment to his adoptive parents and is described as emotionally sensitive, caring, kind, considerate, and empathetic. He has good eye contact and can read facial expressions. He is affectionate and protective of his infant sibling, his biological sister, who is also adopted by his parents and now living in the home. Tony made an excellent adjustment to the start of kindergarten and up until this point was responding positively to his psychotropic medication regimen. But then at age five and a half, Tony experienced sudden and unexplained behavioral worsening, which was followed by the onset of recurrent vomiting and refusal to eat or drink. Comprehensive medical workup including upper endoscopy and biopsy resulted in a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). What would be your next step?

The Importance of Accessible Language for Development in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children

CASE

Brady is a 5-year-old boy who was seen in a multidisciplinary clinic for evaluation of deaf and hard of hearing children. Brady was born full-term after an uncomplicated pregnancy. He was referred for audiological evaluation after his newborn hearing screen and was diagnosed with a severe-to-profound bilateral sensorineural hearing difference at age 6 months. He has no other medical history.Brady was referred for developmental evaluation after completing his medical workup and cochlear implantation at an outside institution. No etiologic cause of his hearing difference was identified, and his diagnosis was presumed to be genetic and nonsyndromic. He had previously undergone right cochlear implantation at age 14 months and left cochlear implantation at age 23 months. Brady received speech and language therapy, with an emphasis on spoken language through early intervention, and met all motor and social milestones at appropriate times. Despite therapy, he continued to show delays in meeting language and communication milestones. Given concerns over persistent language delays after cochlear implantation, he underwent an interdisciplinary speech, language, and psychological evaluation at 3 years 4 months old. At the time of his evaluation, he was noted to have robust social skills but significantly delayed expressive and receptive language skills with language use limited to single words.After the initial evaluation, he was enrolled at a school for the deaf with instruction provided in both spoken English and American Sign Language. In follow-up evaluation at age 4 years 8 months, Brady was described as happy, cooperative, and eager to connect socially. It was noted that he had age-appropriate visual spatial cognitive and motor skills and had made some gains compared with prior assessments in both spoken and sign language. Notably, however, his language abilities and most areas of adaptive living skills remained below what would be expected by his developmental age and in some domains plateaued compared with prior assessments. He was able to produce some words and signs and responded to all prompts using only single words or signs and gestures. Brady's parents present today to your multidisciplinary clinic asking to understand why his language has not progressed further and to learn how they can help him reach his full potential.

Do Referral Factors Predict a Probable Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis? A DBPNet Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of children referred to academic medical centers with concerns about autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) who received a probable ASD diagnosis, identify factors predicting ASD diagnosis, and describe the children with ASD concerns who were not found to have autism.

METHODS

A total of 55 developmental-behavioral pediatricians (DBP) at 12 academic sites in the DBPNet research network recorded data on ≤15 consecutive new patients. They coded presumed diagnoses after their first visit with the child.

RESULTS

Of 784 new visits, 324 (41%) had concern for ASD; of these, 221 (68%) were presumptively ASD+; 103 (32%) were ASD-. In a mixed model accounting for clustering within site and covariates significant in bivariate analysis, significant predictors of receiving a presumptive ASD diagnoses were socialization concerns, languages other than English spoken in the home, and coming for second opinion. Also concern for "other behavior problems" (not mood, oppositionality, anxiety, attention, or repetitive behaviors) predicted not receiving ASD diagnoses. This model was not clinically useful because it misclassified 26.9% of children. ASD- children <4 years old had more language delay and less cognitive impairment and socialization concern than their ASD+ age peers. ASD- children ≥4 years old were more likely to have attention-deficit /hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and learning disability with normal cognition than their ASD+ age peers.

CONCLUSIONS

Two thirds of children referred to academic centers with concern for ASD received a presumptive diagnosis of ASD. While those with ASD were not easily distinguished from those without ASD at referral, virtually all children with ASD concerns had multiple DBP diagnoses made and required DBP follow-up care.

Challenging Case: The Role of Genetic Testing in Complex Autism

CASE

S is a 12-year-old boy with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), seizure disorder, cerebral palsy, and intellectual disability who presented to the primary care clinician for a preventative care visit.S was born at full term after an unremarkable pregnancy. His developmental delays were first noted at around 8 months, when he could not sit independently and had intermittently poor eye contact. He was referred to Part C Early Intervention and subsequently evaluated by a neurodevelopmental pediatrician, where he was noted to be hypotonic, with delayed motor and cognitive skills. Initial genetics evaluation included karyotype, fragile X testing, Angelman and Prader-Willi DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization probes, POLG sequencing, MECP2 testing, a microarray, creatinine kinase, very long-chain fatty acids, lymphocyte arylsulfatase, urine organic acids, and plasma amino acids, all of which were normal.As time progressed, S continued to have motor and communication delays and developed choreic movements. He also developed episodes concerning for seizure, including periods of staring while awake and episodes of extremity shaking lasting a few seconds with associated eye deviation, which eventually progressed to generalized seizures. He also developed periods of lethargy. Outpatient workup included several EEGs, which were notable for foci in the right frontal and left temporal regions. He has had several brain MRIs showing generalized volume loss and had critical laboratory tests during a period of lethargy, which were unconcerning. He was treated with multiple antiseizure medications. He was diagnosed with ASD at age 5 years because of delayed language, poor social communication, and repetitive behaviors.Over time, S continued to experience global developmental delays and autistic-like behaviors and remained minimally verbal. However, clinicians noted a number of developmental strengths, including a generally positive mood, a willingness to participate in therapy, improved receptive language skills, attachment to his mother, and a love of nature and the outdoors. He participated in a number of therapy modalities including speech/language therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, applied behavioral analysis, aqua therapy, partner-assisted scanning, and therapeutic horseback riding.In 2019, whole-exome sequencing was newly covered by the state Medicaid program, and testing was obtained in 2020. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a de novo STXBP1 pathogenic variant c.874C>T (p.Arg292Cys), which is associated with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. His presentation is consistent with STXBP1 encephalopathy including refractory epilepsy, ASD, intellectual disability, and movement disorders.What are important considerations in genetic testing for children with autism? How does a genetic testing result alter management for clinicians and families?

Importance of Trauma-Informed Practice in Evaluation of Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder

CASE

As part of a multidisciplinary adoption support clinic, Erin, a 5-year-old girl, adopted approximately 6 months before the clinic visit, presents for postadoption evaluation. Erin was born at full term. Her birth history was significant for reported maternal treatment for liver failure during pregnancy. Her previous medical history included hospitalization for a viral illness at age 2 months, recurrent ear infections, and a fractured forearm. Family history was significant for a maternal history of bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, borderline personality disorder, and concern for substance abuse; a paternal history of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression; and full biological brother with a history of ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder. Erin and her brother lived with their parents until she was approximately 3 years old. At that time, there were concerns for poor hygiene, inconsistent medical care, poor school attendance for her brother, financial instability, and significant neglect. Erin was reportedly confined to her crib for hours at a time. She and her older brother were removed from the home because of concerns for significant neglect and placed into foster care. Approximately 3 months after foster placement, Erin underwent testing because of concerns for abnormal behaviors and possible developmental delays. Symptoms included poor sleep, repetitive behaviors such as head banging, delayed speech that primarily involved grunting, and lack of toilet training. She was hyperactive and aggressive and had poor caregiver attachment. On evaluation, she was small for age, poorly groomed, and easily distracted with poor eye contact and did not tolerate interactions with examiners. Neuropsychological testing consisted of symptom checklists and caregiver interview only because she did not tolerate diagnostic testing. She was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay with intellectual and language impairments. Over the following year, Erin was transitioned to a second foster family and was subsequently adopted. She received speech, occupational, and physical therapy, along with trauma-informed therapy. She made significant gains in multiple domains and was able to graduate from trauma-informed therapy after 1 year. On examination, Erin greets you with appropriate eye contact and reports that she is feeling "good." She is verbal and interactive with her brother and parents. She looks to parents for support when asked to participate in the physical examination. She does not display any significant repetitive behaviors. Erin's parents are concerned that her initial diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay do not accurately reflect her current level of functioning and are afraid she may have been misdiagnosed. How would you proceed with next steps to address these diagnoses?

Disproportionate Representation of Children of Color and Parents with Disabilities in the Child Welfare System: The Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Immigration Status, and Disability

CASE

An almost 5-year-old girl is referred to a developmental-behavioral clinician for developmental evaluation because of language and learning concerns. Her developmental screening in the primary pediatrics office showed scores concerning for delays in communication, social-emotional, gross, and fine motor domains. Her mother has concerns about her language. Her mother's primary language is Spanish, but the patient and her siblings speak primarily English. She speaks in short phrases and sentences with grammatical errors. Her mother understands approximately 75% of what she says, and strangers understand approximately 50%. She uses gestures and facial expression, is social and friendly, demonstrates pretend play, and plays well with her siblings and other children her age. She has occasional meltdowns, but there are no other major behavioral concerns. She feeds herself with utensils and is able to dress herself. She toilet trained recently, at about age 4.5 years.She did not receive early intervention before age 3 years and had no previous evaluations. She did not attend preschool or child care. Her mother reported that they were referred to the school district twice, but she had trouble requesting the evaluation.She lives with her parents and 2 brothers. The patient's parents immigrated to the United States from Mexico 7 years ago. They are both farm workers, and extended family members are in Mexico. On reviewing family history, the clinician learns that the patient's mother had trouble learning and attended school until she was 12 years old. She did not receive extra help at school. The child's mother said that she forgets things and "has trouble with reading and writing fast." The patient's 10-year-old brother has an individualized education plan and is in a substantially separate classroom. He has inclusion activities of recess, art, and music. He receives speech-language therapy and academic support for reading and writing. The patient's mother becomes tearful and shares that Child Protective Services was notified because of her inability to request the school evaluation, but a case was not opened.Developmental evaluation reveals expressive language at a 33-month-old level and receptive language at a 39-month-old level. Cognitive testing shows extremely low verbal comprehension, borderline visual spatial skills, and fluid reasoning in the low average range. Working memory and processing speed fall in the borderline range. The clinician learns at a follow-up visit that the patient's mother was evaluated by state disability services and has mild intellectual disability.What is your next step in management? What feedback or resources would you provide to the pediatric clinician and family?

The Adaptive GameSquad Xbox-Based Physical Activity and Health Coaching Intervention for Youth With Neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Diagnoses: Pilot Feasibility Study

Background

The prevalence of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric diagnoses (NPDs) in youth is increasing, and unhealthy physical activity (PA), diet, screen time, and sleep habits contribute to the chronic disease disparities and behavioral challenges this population experiences.

Objective

This pilot study aims to adapt a proven exergaming and telehealth PA coaching intervention for typically developing youth with overweight or obesity; expand it to address diet, screen, and sleep behaviors; and then test its feasibility and acceptability, including PA engagement, among youth with NPDs.

Methods

Participants (N=23; mean age 15.1 years, SD 1.5; 17 males, 9 people of color) recruited in person from clinic and special education settings were randomized to the Adaptive GameSquad (AGS) intervention or wait-list control. The 10-week adapted intervention included 3 exergaming sessions per week and 6 real-time telehealth coaching sessions. The primary outcomes included feasibility (adherence to planned sessions), engagement (uptake and acceptability as reported on process questionnaires), and PA level (combined light, moderate, and vigorous as measured by accelerometer). Descriptive statistics summarized feasibility and engagement data, whereas paired, two-tailed t tests assessed group differences in pre-post PA.

Results

Of the 6 coaching sessions, AGS participants (n=11; mean age 15.3 years, SD 1.2; 7 males, 4 people of color) completed an average of 5 (83%), averaging 81.2 minutes per week of exergaming. Of 9 participants who completed the exit questionnaire, 6 (67%) reported intention to continue, and 8 (89%) reported feeling that the coaching sessions were helpful. PA and sleep appeared to increase during the course of the intervention over baseline, video game use appeared to decrease, and pre-post intervention PA per day significantly decreased for the control (−58.8 min; P=.04) but not for the intervention group (−5.3 min; P=.77), despite potential seasonality effects. However, beta testers and some intervention participants indicated a need for reduced complexity of technology and more choice in exergames.

Conclusions

AGS shows promise in delivering a health behavior intervention remotely to youth with NPDs, but a full-scale efficacy trial with a larger sample size is needed to confirm this finding. On the basis of feedback from beta testers and intervention participants, the next steps should include reduced technology burden and increased exergame choice before efficacy testing.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03665415; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03665415.

Assessment and Treatment of a Young Adult with Congenital Heart Disease and ADHD

CASE

Phillip is a young man born with hypoplastic left heart syndrome referred to your practice for a range of mental health concerns. He underwent palliation to an extracardiac Fontan in infancy and experienced multiple complications over the next decade including valvular regurgitation and arrhythmias necessitating a pacemaker. Phillip continued to have systolic heart failure with New York Heart Association class II symptoms, managed with 4 medications and anticoagulation.Despite this complex history, Phillip had intact cognitive abilities, achieved typical milestones, and performed well academically in secondary school. His first year of college proved to be more challenging, and Phillip presented to the outpatient psychiatry service with an acute depressive episode. His family history included depression, without known attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Treatment, including a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, cognitive behavioral therapy, and family support, led to near resolution of his symptoms of depression.In subsequent appointments, Phillip described a long history of inattention and disorganization with onset in childhood. This contributed to the decision to leave college, despite remission of symptoms of depression. Phillip was unable to study for any extended period without "perfect conditions," described as the absence of potential distractions except for background music. Despite attempts to maintain "perfect conditions," Phillip was often off task and "hyperfocusing" on irrelevant topics. Phillip struggled with planning and time management and would misplace items daily. Moreover, although the importance of self-care was well understood, Phillip often forgot to take his cardiac medication or to exercise, and he admitted to inconsistent sleep habits because of losing track of time.Based on a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation including retrospective report from a parent, Phillip was diagnosed with ADHD, coexisting with major depressive disorder, in remission. Significant ADHD symptoms were documented by interview, self-report, and administration of an abbreviated neuropsychological battery.Considering concerns regarding use of stimulants in a patient with congenital heart disease, including death, stroke, and myocardial infarction,1,2 how would you assess the risks-benefits of use of stimulants with Phillip?

REFERENCES

1. Wilens TE, Prince JB, Spencer TJ, et al. Stimulants and sudden death: what is a physician to do? Pediatrics. 2006;118:1215-1219.2. Zito JM, Burcu M. Stimulants and pediatric cardiovascular risk. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017;27:538-545.

Use of Telehealth in Fellowship-Affiliated Developmental Behavioral Pediatric Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the use of telehealth in developmental behavioral pediatric (DBP) fellowship-affiliated practices during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic.

METHODS

An electronic survey was disseminated to all DBP fellowship-associated practice locations to determine the use of telehealth in DBP care provision, before and since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed responses using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 35 of 42 eligible practice sites responded (83% response rate). Most sites (51.4%) reported using telehealth less than once per month before the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the onset of COVID-19, 100% of programs reported conducting video-based telehealth visits multiple days per week. Most sites reported conducting evaluations and follow-up visits for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, behavioral concerns, developmental delay, genetic disorders, and learning disability. Most sites were able to continue medication management by telehealth (>88%), offer interpreter services for families with limited English proficiency participating in telehealth visits (>90%), and incorporate trainees and interdisciplinary team members in telehealth visits (>90%). Greater variability was observed in sites' ability to collect telehealth practice evaluation measures.

CONCLUSION

Most sites are providing evaluations and ongoing care for DBP conditions through telehealth. The rapid adoption of telehealth can have ramifications for the way that DBP care is delivered in the future; therefore, it is imperative to understand current practice patterns and variations to determine the best use of telehealth.

When to Raise Our White Flag-A Discussion of Scope of Practice in a Resource Scarce World

Thomas is a 13-year-old boy with autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder who presented for a follow-up to his developmental and behavioral pediatrician (DBP). His mother describes an increase in symptoms of anxiety and depression for the last 6 weeks, accompanied by suicidal ideation and thoughts of self-mutilation.Before this increase in symptoms, he had been doing well for the last several months with the exception of increasing weight gain, and Abilify was decreased from 5 mg to 2.5 mg at his last visit. Other medications at that time included Zoloft 100 mg twice daily, Focalin XR 40 mg every morning, and Focalin 5 mg every night. Without seeking the guidance of our developmental and behavioral pediatrics clinic, his mother increased his intake of Zoloft to 150 mg each morning and continued 100 mg each evening because of worsening anxiety and depression.Religion is very important to Thomas and his family. He acknowledges that he does not want to die and feels badly because "suicide is against our religion."Helping Thomas receive appropriate care has been a challenge. He was diagnosed with ADHD and Asperger disorder at the age of 5. Thomas is homeschooled and is very attached to his mother. His parents have very different parenting styles, with his mother being more permissive and his father more authoritarian. At the time of initial diagnosis, the behavioral health services (BHS) in Thomas' community, which is about an hour away from the DBP, were limited to older children, and he was followed by a DBP for ADHD medication management. At the age of 11, he expressed passive suicidal ideation and described that he imagined his mother as "the devil with fire coming out of her eyes" when she corrected him. He was evaluated by BHS, diagnosed with anxiety disorder, and started on Lexapro. BHS linked to the DBP were out of network for his insurance. The family was unable to pay out of pocket, so care was subsequently transferred to a DBP clinic that was in network. Soon after, Thomas developed auditory hallucinations, and Abilify was added after consultation with BHS.Over the last few years, Thomas' symptoms have waxed and waned. He did well for a short time and then again developed auditory hallucinations, worsening symptoms of anxiety and depression, and increasing somatic symptoms including vomiting and penile pain. Medications were adjusted with input from BHS, and further attempts were made to link him to local BHS but were unsuccessful. With his current concerns of suicidal ideation and self-mutilation, what would be your next steps?

Effect of Family Navigation on Diagnostic Ascertainment Among Children at Risk for Autism: A Randomized Clinical Trial From DBPNet

IMPORTANCE

Early identification of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is associated with improved cognitive and behavioral outcomes. Targeted strategies are needed to support equitable access to diagnostic services to ensure that children from low-income and racial/ethnic minority families receive the benefits of early ASD identification and treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficacy of family navigation (FN), an individually tailored, culturally informed care management strategy, to increase the likelihood of achieving diagnostic ascertainment among young children at risk for ASD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This randomized clinical trial of 249 families of children aged 15 to 27 months who had positive screening results for possible ASD was conducted in 11 urban primary care sites in 3 cities. Data collection occurred from February 24, 2015, through November 5, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis from November 5, 2018, to July 27, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Families were randomized to FN or conventional care management (CCM). Families receiving FN were assigned a navigator who conducted community-based outreach to families to address structural barriers to care and support engagement in recommended services. Families receiving CCM were assigned to a care manager, who did limited telephone outreach. Families received FN or CCM after positive initial screening results and for 100 days after diagnostic ascertainment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome, diagnostic ascertainment, was measured as the number of days from randomization to completion of the child's clinical developmental evaluation, when a diagnosis of ASD or other developmental disorder was determined.

RESULTS

Among 250 families randomized, 249 were included in the primary analysis (174 boys [69.9%]; mean [SD] age, 22.0 [3.5] months; 205 [82.3%] publicly insured; 233 [93.6%] non-White). Children who received FN had a greater likelihood of reaching diagnostic ascertainment over the course of 1 year (FN, 108 of 126 [85.7%]; CCM, 94 of 123 [76.4%]; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.05-1.84]). Site (Boston, New Haven, and Philadelphia) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) moderated the effect of FN (treatment × site interaction; P = .03; Boston: HR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.31-3.26]; New Haven: HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 0.94-3.89]; and Philadelphia: HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.60-1.37]) (treatment × ethnicity interaction; P < .001; Hispanic families: HR, 2.81 [95% CI, 2.23-3.54] vs non-Hispanic families: HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.45-1.53]). The magnitude of FN's effect was significantly greater among Hispanic families than among non-Hispanic families (diagnostic ascertainment among Hispanic families: FN, 90.9% [30 of 33], and CCM, 53.3% [16 of 30]; vs non-Hispanic families: FN, 89.7% [35 of 39], and CCM, 77.5% [31 of 40]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Family navigation improved the likelihood of diagnostic ascertainment among children from racial/ethnic minority, low-income families who were detected as at risk for ASD in primary care. Results suggest differential effects of FN by site and ethnicity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02359084.

Congenital Blindness and Autism Spectrum Disorder

CASE

Emily is a 10-year-old girl who is in fifth grade. She has known congenital blindness secondary to septo-optic dysplasia with bilateral optic nerve hypoplasia and precocious puberty. Emily was referred to a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics clinic for concerns of academic, social, and language challenges.Emily was born at term gestation after an uncomplicated pregnancy. At 4 months of age, she underwent ophthalmologic evaluation because of nystagmus, reduced visual tracking and response to light, and increased startle response to touch. An magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and orbits demonstrated bilateral hypoplastic optic nerves and the absence of posterior pituitary. Subsequent endocrinological evaluation for pituitary function was reassuring. Emily's early developmental milestones were delayed across all domains. She participated in early intervention programming including speech/language, physical, and occupational therapy with interval improvement in skills. She also received supports for low vision. In the elementary school, she received supports and services for low vision in a general education classroom. It was observed that Emily had reduced interest in her peers, a strong preference for routine, and distinctive play interests. As elementary school progressed, Emily had increasing challenges with academic achievement, despite performing well on formal testing in second grade.At a recent ophthalmology visit, Emily's best-corrected visual acuity was noted to be 20/800 in each eye.Neuropsychological testing was completed with visual accommodation and administration of measures with minimal visual requirements. Cognitive testing revealed variable verbal intellect and language skills. Academic testing revealed strong reading abilities and a relative weakness in math. Adaptive measures were notable for reduced function and highlighted social vulnerabilities. Parent measures regarding mood and behavior were not concerning.Emily's speech was noted to have a very distinctive prosody with notable response latency. Echolalia and scripting were appreciated, and Emily often asked about names and used made-up words. When excited, Emily flapped her arms and hands, jumped up and down, or clapped her hands quickly. Socially, Emily was engaged and seemed eager to please. She was able to participate in back-and-forth conversation. Although she often responded to social bids, she frequently directed the conversation to her own areas of interest. Emily looked in the direction of the examiner when talking to the examiner and when the examiner spoke. Although a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder is under consideration, what special considerations are necessary in the context of congenital blindness?

Periconception weight management in the Women, Infants, and Children program

INTRODUCTION

Reproductive age women, particularly low-income and minority women, are at risk for obesity. As an integral service provider for these women, the US Department of Agriculture Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children is uniquely positioned to refine its focus and efforts.

METHODS

Strategies for accomplishing this goal include identifying pregnant, inter-partum and post-partum women in need of targeted patient-centred services including education, counselling and support to address weight loss or appropriate gestational weight gain.

RESULTS

These services may include calorie-controlled diets, behavioural strategies, alternative methods of education delivery and extending post-partum benefits. Implementation of these strategies is feasible through collaboration with related government subsidized programs and reallocation of funds, staff and other resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the magnitude of the problem and the adverse outcomes that obesity has on health and quality of life, Women, Infants, and Children can more positively impact the lives of our most vulnerable families, which face an obesogenic environment.

Features of Catatonia in a 12-Year-Old Boy with Autism Spectrum Disorder

CASE

Thomas is a 12-year-old boy with autism spectrum disorder who presents to his primary care clinician with symptoms of worsening mood in the last 3 months. On review of his last school testing, his cognitive abilities are found to be within the average range, with a relative vulnerability with his processing speed. He can speak in sentences to communicate and answer questions, but he rarely picks up on conversational bids. He has had difficulties developing friendships and often prefers to play by himself.Thomas has a long history of some features of anxiety and depression for which it was recommended that he establish care with a therapist, but his family has had a hard time finding a provider for him. At this visit, the mother reports that for the past several months he has been more anxious, sad, and easily overwhelmed. He seems irritable at home and school and cries often. His family has been advocating for him to receive increased school supports, as school is a source of anxiety for him, but there are no recent changes in school services. There is a family history of both anxiety and depression. Given his worsening mood functioning, Thomas was started on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication in addition to again recommending a therapist. Weekly phone call check-ins and an in-person clinic visit in 1 month are planned.About 1 month after starting the SSRI medication, he is still not showing any improvement in mood functioning, and his family reports he seems more "sluggish" than usual. There are no side effects reported with the medication, and the dose is increased to see whether it will help. However, about 2 weeks later, he is seen again in the clinic because there are increasing concerns. He continues to be "sluggish." During the clinic visit, he lies down on the examination table, sometimes holding his head off the edge of the table, which he has never done before. He responds very slowly to the questions and often says "I don't know, I don't know," almost in an automatic way. His mother reports that he is now engaging in some repetitive hand movements which he had not done previously. He is no longer able to shower independently. He is still eating and drinking adequately. What would you do next?

A mixed-methods process evaluation of Family Navigation implementation for autism spectrum disorder

There is growing interest in Family Navigation as an approach to improving access to care for children with autism spectrum disorder, yet little data exist on the implementation of Family Navigation. The aim of this study was to identify potential failures in implementing Family Navigation for children with autism spectrum disorder, using a failure modes and effects analysis. This mixed-methods study was set within a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of Family Navigation in reducing the time from screening to diagnosis and treatment for autism spectrum disorder across three states. Using standard failure modes and effects analysis methodology, experts in Family Navigation for autism spectrum disorder (n = 9) rated potential failures in implementation on a 10-point scale in three categories: likelihood of the failure occurring, likelihood of not detecting the failure, and severity of failure. Ratings were then used to create a risk priority number for each failure. The failure modes and effects analysis detected five areas for potential "high priority" failures in implementation: (1) setting up community-based services, (2) initial family meeting, (3) training, (4) fidelity monitoring, and (5) attending testing appointments. Reasons for failure included families not receptive, scheduling, and insufficient training time. The process with the highest risk profile was "setting up community-based services." Failure in "attending testing appointment" was rated as the most severe potential failure. A number of potential failures in Family Navigation implementation-along with strategies for mitigation-were identified. These data can guide those working to implement Family Navigation for children with autism spectrum disorder.

A hybrid type I randomized effectiveness-implementation trial of patient navigation to improve access to services for children with autism spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Significant racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in access to evidence-based treatment services for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Patient Navigation (PN) is a theory-based care management strategy designed to reduce disparities in access to care. The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of PN a strategy to reduce disparities in access to evidence-based services for vulnerable children with ASD, as well as to explore factors that impact implementation.

METHODS

This study uses a hybrid type I randomized effectiveness/implementation design to test effectiveness and collect data on implementation concurrently. It is a two-arm comparative effectiveness trial with a target of 125 participants per arm. Participants are families of children age 15-27 months who receive a positive screen for ASD at a primary care visit at urban clinics in Massachusetts (n = 6 clinics), Connecticut (n = 1), and Pennsylvania (n = 2). The trial measures diagnostic interval (number of days from positive screen to diagnostic determination) and time to receipt of evidence-based ASD services/recommended services (number of days from date of diagnosis to receipt of services) in those with PN compared to and activated control -Conventional Care Management - which is similar to care management received in a high quality medical home. At the same time, a mixed-method implementation evaluation is being carried out.

DISCUSSION

This study will examine the effectiveness of PN to reduce the time to and receipt of evidence-based services for vulnerable children with ASD, as well as factors that influence implementation. Findings will tell us both if PN is an effective approach for improving access to evidence-based care for children with ASD, and inform future strategies for dissemination.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02359084 Registered February 1, 2015.

"More than Meets the Eye": When the Neonatal Course May Impact Several Years Out

Nadia is a 7-year-old girl who you have followed since her discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Her parents are here today for an urgent visit with behavioral concerns, such as inattention, hyperactivity, and aggression.Nadia is a former 40-weeker born through vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery at 9 pounds 7 ounces. Her delivery was complicated with shoulder dystocia, which resulted in resuscitation. Her Apgar scores were 1, 3, and 4 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. After intubation and stabilization on mechanical ventilation, Nadia was transferred to the NICU. Her neonatal course included systemic hypothermia using "cool cap" for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) for a duration of 72 hours. She was extubated on day of life 3. She had an occupational therapy consultation for poor suck/feeding, and it quickly improved. She was discharged on day of life 14. On discharge, Nadia was referred to early intervention (EI) and the NICU follow-up clinic. Nadia was followed by EI until 12 months of age and in the NICU follow-up clinic until 18 months of age, as there were no concerns meeting her developmental milestones or her neuromotor development.At this urgent visit, Nadia's parents report that she attended a family child care from 1.5 to 3 years of age, Head Start from 3 to 5 years of age and the local public school from 5 years to present. Since starting child care, Nadia's teachers have reported that she requires a lot of redirection and refocusing, fidgets a lot in class, and can be aggressive toward her peers when unprovoked. Since her parents had not seen these behaviors at home, they thought it was a phase that she would grow out of. However, as they began to work with her to complete school assignments, they noticed that it was very difficult for Nadia to sit still and focus on work. They also struggled in the mornings to get her ready and off to school.The parents bring in Conners scales completed by themselves and her lead teacher, and with these and our clinical observations, we diagnose her with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), combined type. We discuss risk factors and ADHD management with her parents. During our discussion, Nadia's father, who has done some reading on ADHD, remembers reading an article about HIE and NICU stay being risk factors for ADHD. He wonders if this affects the choice of management of her ADHD symptoms. How would you address his query?

Reducing Disparities in Timely Autism Diagnosis Through Family Navigation: Results From a Randomized Pilot Trial

OBJECTIVE

Emerging evidence suggests that autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be diagnosed by age 18 months and that early intensive behavioral intervention positively affects ASD core deficits. This pilot randomized controlled trial examined the feasibility of using an adapted form of patient navigation, Family Navigation (FN), to improve timely diagnosis of ASD in low-income families from racial-ethnic minority groups.

METHODS

Forty children referred for an ASD diagnostic assessment were randomly allocated to receive FN or usual care. The primary outcome, time to diagnostic resolution, was assessed with survival analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen of 20 FN children completed the diagnostic assessment, compared with 11 of 19 children receiving usual care (hazard ratio=3.21, 95% confidence interval=1.47-6.98, p<.01). In regard to engagement of participants, 17 of 20 families (85%) met with the navigator for the targeted three in-person visits (median=4, range 1-9).

CONCLUSIONS

FN may be a promising intervention to address barriers that impede timely ASD diagnosis.

Medically Complex Care: The Newest Competency for Primary Care?

Nola is a complicated 22-month (19-mo corrected) former 34-week premature girl who presents to your practice in the company of her foster caretaker, a maternal aunt. The history you have comes mostly through the lens of her aunt's recall of a variety of clinical encounters and emergency room visits that have taken place at 2 of the region's tertiary care centers, including a prolonged recent hospitalization for failure to thrive. Regrettably, you have no discharge summary on hand from the outside institution.Fortunately, Nola's aunt has come prepared. From her notes, you learn that Nola has a history of feeding difficulties and "global developmental delay." The details of Nola's prenatal and neonatal intensive care unit admission are scant. Nola has been described as having "unusual facial features, such as smallish eyes, low tone, some vision problems." A physical examination demonstrates significant delays in all streams of development. Nola's aunt recalls that she may need a gastrostomy tube pending her weight gain in the next few months.At present, Nola's aunt/foster caretaker is caring for her at home and expresses her concern about 4 major areas: coordinating multiple appointments at various sites, keeping track of involved medical information, getting all of the "paperwork" done to get needed upgrades for a feeding chair, and buying expensive special formula with her own money. Nola's aunt is intelligent and motivated, but she has limited help at home and is overwhelmed with all the aspects of the care. The aunt acknowledges the importance of multiple appointments-feeding support, developmental evaluations, vision, and neurologic assessments. When you inquire who Nola's aunt identifies as her niece's primary care provider, she reports that she has seen different doctors due to the vagaries of her schedule.You conclude that Nola's situation is not likely to improve without a dramatic intervention. As you try to pull together a plan, you wonder what the most effective approach is for the busy clinician. Who should take the lead on a child's care? Can a primary care pediatric clinician partner with other specialists and programs and use other members of a care team effectively? And, does care coordination provide better more cost-effective care?

Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Mobile devices are a ubiquitous part of American life, yet how families use this technology has not been studied. We aimed to describe naturalistic patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children to generate hypotheses about its effects on caregiver-child interaction.

METHODS

Using nonparticipant observational methods, we observed 55 caregivers eating with 1 or more young children in fast food restaurants in a single metropolitan area. Observers wrote detailed field notes, continuously describing all aspects of mobile device use and child and caregiver behavior during the meal. Field notes were then subjected to qualitative analysis using grounded theory methods to identify common themes of device use.

RESULTS

Forty caregivers used devices during their meal. The dominant theme salient to mobile device use and caregiver-child interaction was the degree of absorption in devices caregivers exhibited. Absorption was conceptualized as the extent to which primary engagement was with the device, rather than the child, and was determined by frequency, duration, and modality of device use; child response to caregiver use, which ranged from entertaining themselves to escalating bids for attention, and how caregivers managed this behavior; and separate versus shared use of devices. Highly absorbed caregivers often responded harshly to child misbehavior.

CONCLUSIONS

We documented a range of patterns of mobile device use, characterized by varying degrees of absorption. These themes may be used as a foundation for coding schemes in quantitative studies exploring device use and child outcomes.

Improving maternal mental health after a child's diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: results from a randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE

The prevalence of psychological distress among mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) suggests a need for interventions that address parental mental health during the critical period after the child's autism diagnosis when parents are learning to navigate the complex system of autism services.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a brief cognitive behavioral intervention, problem-solving education (PSE), decreases parenting stress and maternal depressive symptoms during the period immediately following a child's diagnosis of ASD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A randomized clinical trial compared 6 sessions of PSE with usual care. Settings included an autism clinic and 6 community-based early intervention programs that primarily serve low-income families. Participants were mothers of 122 young children (mean age, 34 months) who recently received a diagnosis of ASD. Among mothers assessed for eligibility, 17.0% declined participation. We report outcomes after 3 months of follow-up (immediate postdiagnosis period).

INTERVENTIONS

Problem-solving education is a brief, cognitive intervention delivered in six 30-minute individualized sessions by existing staff (early intervention programs) or research staff without formal mental health training (autism clinic).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were parental stress and maternal depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine mothers were randomized to receive PSE and 63 to receive usual care. The follow-up rate was 91.0%. Most intervention mothers (78.0%) received the full PSE course. At the 3-month follow-up assessment, PSE mothers were significantly less likely than those serving as controls to have clinically significant parental stress (3.8% vs 29.3%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.65). For depressive symptoms, the risk reduction in clinically significant symptoms did not reach statistical significance (5.7% vs 22.4%; aRR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.10 to 1.08); however, the reduction in mean depressive symptoms was statistically significant (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology score, 4.6 with PSE vs 6.9 with usual care; adjusted mean difference, -1.67; 95% CI, -3.17 to -0.18).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The positive effects of PSE in reducing parenting stress and depressive symptoms during the critical postdiagnosis period, when parents are asked to navigate a complex service delivery system, suggest that it may have a place in clinical practice. Further work will monitor these families for a total of 9 months to determine the trajectory of outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01021384.

Clinical validity of a brief measure of early childhood social-emotional/behavioral problems

OBJECTIVE

To address a pressing need for measures of clinically significant social-emotional/behavioral problems in young children by examining several validity indicators for a brief parent-report questionnaire.

METHODS

An ethnically and economically diverse sample of 213 referred and nonreferred 2- and 3-year-olds was studied. The validity of the Brief Infant-Toddler Social-Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) Problem Index and Internalizing and Externalizing scales was evaluated relative to a "gold standard" diagnostic interview, as well as the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).

RESULTS

The validity of the BITSEA Problem Index relative to Diagnosis (sensitivity = 72.7%-80.8%, specificity = 70.0%-83.3%) and clinical-range CBCL scores (sensitivity = 80.0%-96.2%, specificity = 75.0%-89.9%) was supported in the full sample and within minority/nonminority groups. Additional results supported the validity of the BITSEA Internalizing and Externalizing scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Documented validity suggests that the BITSEA may be a valuable tool to aid screening, identification, and assessment efforts targeting early-emergent social-emotional/behavioral problems. Practical implications and generalizability are discussed.

Improving early literacy promotion: a quality-improvement project for Reach Out and Read

BACKGROUND

The Reach Out and Read (ROR) program promotes early literacy as part of pediatric primary care through the distribution of children's books and anticipatory guidance during early childhood.

OBJECTIVES

To improve the rates of age-appropriate book-giving during well-child care and the delivery of ROR-recommended anticipatory guidance in 6 pediatric clinics.

METHODS

Three quality-improvement cycles were completed at each site. Practice-level data were shared with participants in iterative sessions to identify methods for improving care. A provider-training DVD was used to promote these ROR activities.

RESULTS

Over the course of the project, the median rate of book-giving increased from 97% to 99% and for anticipatory guidance remained at 89%. Providers reported significantly improved ROR-related skills, particularly self-efficacy for modeling reading aloud and for using children's books to assess development.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline adherence to the ROR program is high, possibly because of the ease of implementation. Quality improvement for ROR is feasible and may be easier to implement for book distribution than anticipatory guidance, although providers reported improved anticipatory-guidance skills. Future quality-improvement efforts should continue to address giving books and anticipatory guidance, both of which are integral to the ROR model.

Books and reading: evidence-based standard of care whose time has come

Reach Out and Read (ROR) is the only systematically evaluated clinical activity to promote child development in primary care used throughout the United States. The ROR intervention is straightforward: clinicians provide advice about the benefits of reading aloud, as well as directly giving books to high-risk children and parents to take home at each pediatric visit of children aged 6 months to 5 years. ROR builds upon a significant evidence base of the value of reading aloud to young children. The studies evaluating ROR from different sites from subjects from different racial backgrounds and numerous outcome measures are consistently positive. From its initial single site at Boston City Hospital in 1989, to over 4600 clinical sites in 2010, over 30 000 clinicians distributed over 6.2 million books a year to 3.9 million children across the United States. The future efforts for ROR include integrating mental health competencies found in American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines as part of residency and clinician training into the ROR paradigm, quality improvement to ensure fidelity to the intervention, and expanded pediatric clinician involvement in local early childhood/school readiness community efforts. Finally, the most important future goal is the adoption of giving advice about reading aloud and giving developmentally appropriate books to high-risk families as best practice by official bodies.

Exposure to potentially traumatic events in early childhood: differential links to emergent psychopathology

OBJECTIVE

  To examine associations between exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and clinical patterns of symptoms and disorders in preschool children.

METHOD

  Two hundred and thirteen referred and non-referred children, ages 24 to 48 months (MN = 34.9, SD = 6.7 months) were studied. Lifetime exposure to PTEs (family violence and non-interpersonal events) and recent stressful life events were assessed with the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA) and Child Life Events Scale. Child psychiatric symptoms and disorders were assessed with parent-reports in the PAPA, a comprehensive, developmentally sensitive interview. Sociodemographic risk, parental anxiety and depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression, Beck Anxiety Inventory), and child developmental level (Mullen Scales of Early Learning) also were assessed.

RESULTS

  Violence exposure was broadly associated with psychiatric status in the areas of depression, separation anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and conduct problems, whereas potentially traumatic non-interpersonal exposure was associated with phobic anxiety. The majority of the associations between violence exposure and preschoolers' symptoms were significant even when other key factors, including economic disadvantage and parental mood and anxiety symptoms, were controlled statistically. However, parental depressive/anxious symptoms may have partially or fully mediated the relationships between violence exposure and depressive and conduct symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of robust associations between violence exposure and early childhood internalizing and externalizing disorders and symptoms highlights the need for longitudinal prospective research concerning neurodevelopmental mechanisms and pathways. Findings underscore the relevance of assessing trauma exposure, particularly interpersonal violence, to identify young children at risk.

Disruptive and oppositional behavior in an 11-year old boy

Tony is an 11-year old boy in the fifth grade whose mother describes him as "really a good kid who is bright and tries to be friendly. But he's always doing things that get him in trouble at school and sometimes at home." Tony was diagnosed with ADHD (combined type) 2 years ago. Stimulant therapy improved his attention and concentration during school, decreased hyperactivity in the classroom and improved educational achievements. However, Tony is oppositional and disruptive on the playground, during team sports and at home. His teacher observed that he wants to fit in, but he quickly gets in arguments with other children. He has difficulty sustaining friendships because he typically annoys others with unreasonable demands. He often has temper tantrums when things do not go his way; the tantrums are not prolonged but frequent. At home, on several occasions Tony hit his younger sister, and he once threw a dinner plate against the wall during a family meal. Although his mother describes these behaviors as present for many years, they seem to be escalating. Tony lives with both parents and his younger sister. There is no history of marital discord or major life event change in the past year. Standardized achievement tests demonstrate average to above average achievement scores. He continues to get mostly B grades and an occasional C. Tony's parents have tried to limit television time as a punishment for disruptive behaviors without any apparent effect. His mother reports that she yelled at him on several occasions when he refused to carry out household chores. "He gets angry at the simplest request for help." After meeting with Tony and his mother and completing a normal physical examination, the pediatrician referred Tony to a child psychologist for behavioral therapy.

Receipt of special education services following elementary school grade retention

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the proportion of children who receive an Individualized Education Program (IEP) following grade retention in elementary school.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Children retained in kindergarten or first (K/1) grade and third grade, presumably for academic reasons, were followed up through fifth grade.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Presence or absence of an IEP.

RESULTS

A total of 300 children retained in K/1 and 80 retained in third grade were included in the study. Of the K/1 retainees, 68.9% never received an IEP during the subsequent 4 to 5 years; of the third-grade retainees, 72.3% never received an IEP. Kindergarten/first-grade retainees in the highest quintile for socioeconomic status and those with suburban residence were less likely to receive an IEP than retained children in all other socioeconomic status quintiles (adjusted odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.62) and in rural communities (0.16; 0.06-0.44). Among K/1 retainees with persistently low academic achievement in math and reading, as assessed by standardized testing, 38.2% and 29.7%, respectively, never received an IEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Most children retained in K/1 or third grade for academic reasons, including many of those who demonstrated sustained academic difficulties, never received an IEP during elementary school. Further studies are important to elucidate whether retained elementary schoolchildren are being denied their rights to special education services. In the meantime, early-grade retention may provide an opportunity for pediatricians to help families advocate for appropriate special education evaluations for children experiencing school difficulties.

The relationship between maternal depression, in-home violence and use of physical punishment: what is the role of child behaviour?

BACKGROUND

The combined impact of maternal depression and in-home violence, and how their relationship with physical punishment varies with child behaviour are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the combined impact of maternal depression and violence exposure on smacking and explore the role of child behaviours in this relationship.

METHODS

Multivariable regression analysis of a sample of kindergarten children. Maternal depressive symptoms, violence exposure and smacking were measured by parent interview. Child behaviours were reported by teachers.

RESULTS

12,764 mother-child dyads were examined. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for smacking among depressed mothers was 1.59 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.80), mothers exposed to in-home violence 1.48 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.85) and dually exposed mothers 2.51 (95% CI 1.87 to 3.37). Adjusting for child self-control or externalising behaviour did not change these associations, and no effect modification by child behaviour was detected. Among mothers smacking children, depression was associated with increased smacking frequency (adjusted incident rate ratio (aIRR) 1.12; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.24), but became borderline significant after adjusting for child self-control or externalising behaviour (aIRRs 1.10; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.21). Depressed mothers exposed to violence demonstrated higher rates of smacking (aIRR 1.29; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.53); this remained stable when adjusting for child behaviours.

CONCLUSION

Maternal depression and violence exposure are associated with smacking, particularly when depression and violence co-exist, when they are also associated with smacking frequency. Child self-control and externalising behaviour do not substantially impact the association between maternal depressive symptoms, violence exposure and smacking.

From mother's mouth to infant's brain

Perspective on the paper by Saito et al (see page 113)

Maternal depression and violence exposure: double jeopardy for child school functioning

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to determine how violence exposure affects the relationship between maternal depression, cognitive ability, and child behavior.

METHODS

A multivariate regression analysis of data for a nationally representative sample of kindergarten students was performed. Maternal depression and violence exposure were measured with standardized parent interviews. Standardized T scores were derived from direct testing of children in reading, mathematics, and general knowledge; child behavior was reported by teachers.

RESULTS

A total of 9360 children had neither maternal depression nor violence exposure, 779 violence only, 1564 depression only, and 380 both. Maternal depression alone was associated with poorer mean T scores for reading, mathematics, and general knowledge. However, this effect was attenuated by nearly 25% for reading and general knowledge with adjustment for violence. Children with concurrent exposure to depression and violence had lower mean T scores for reading, mathematics, and general knowledge, as well as more-concerning behaviors, than did those exposed to either factor alone. Across all outcome measures, boys seemed more affected than girls.

CONCLUSIONS

Violence compounds the effect of maternal depression on school functioning and behavior. Research and intervention planning for children affected by maternal depression should consider violence exposure.

Preadolescents' report of exposure to violence: association with friends' and own substance use

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether children's Exposure to Violence (EV) is associated with their own or their friends' use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs (ATOD).

METHODS

The Violence Exposure Scale for Children-Revised (VEX-R) and the Substance Exposure Assessment (SXA) were given to 104 children participating in a longitudinal study of in-utero cocaine exposure (IUCE) at age 8.5, 9.5, and 11 years. Survival analyses evaluated the association of the quartile of VEX total score (higher scores indicating more violence exposure) at age 8.5 years, with time to first report of their own and their friends' use of ATOD from age 8.5-11 years.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 90% African-American/Caribbean children (mean age 8.5 years, SD 3 years), 53% males, and 49% with IUCE. The percentage of children who reported having substance-using friends was 12% at 8.5 years, 25% by 9.5 years, and 45% by 11 years. In multivariate survival analyses controlling for caregiver type, IUCE category, and child gender, children in the upper quartile of VEX-R total score at age 8.5 years were at significantly greater risk of having reported friends' use of ATOD by age 11 compared to those in the first through third quartiles (hazard ratio = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.14, 4.23; p = .02). Quartiles of the VEX score, however, were not significantly associated with children's acknowledgment of their own use (p = .85).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest an association between EV in childhood and report of peer ATOD use at school age. Campaigns to prevent ATOD use should address the impact of childhood exposure to violence.