Oral Iptacopan Monotherapy in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

BACKGROUND

Persistent hemolytic anemia and a lack of oral treatments are challenges for patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria who have received anti-C5 therapy or have not received complement inhibitors. Iptacopan, a first-in-class oral factor B inhibitor, has been shown to improve hemoglobin levels in these patients.

METHODS

In two phase 3 trials, we assessed iptacopan monotherapy over a 24-week period in patients with hemoglobin levels of less than 10 g per deciliter. In the first, anti-C5-treated patients were randomly assigned to switch to iptacopan or to continue anti-C5 therapy. In the second, single-group trial, patients who had not received complement inhibitors and who had lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels more than 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range received iptacopan. The two primary end points in the first trial were an increase in the hemoglobin level of at least 2 g per deciliter from baseline and a hemoglobin level of at least 12 g per deciliter, each without red-cell transfusion; the primary end point for the second trial was an increase in hemoglobin level of at least 2 g per deciliter from baseline without red-cell transfusion.

RESULTS

In the first trial, 51 of the 60 patients who received iptacopan had an increase in the hemoglobin level of at least 2 g per deciliter from baseline, and 42 had a hemoglobin level of at least 12 g per deciliter, each without transfusion; none of the 35 anti-C5-treated patients attained the end-point levels. In the second trial, 31 of 33 patients had an increase in the hemoglobin level of at least 2 g per deciliter from baseline without red-cell transfusion. In the first trial, 59 of the 62 patients who received iptacopan and 14 of the 35 anti-C5-treated patients did not require or receive transfusion; in the second trial, no patients required or received transfusion. Treatment with iptacopan increased hemoglobin levels, reduced fatigue, reduced reticulocyte and bilirubin levels, and resulted in mean LDH levels that were less than 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range. Headache was the most frequent adverse event with iptacopan.

CONCLUSIONS

Iptacopan treatment improved hematologic and clinical outcomes in anti-C5-treated patients with persistent anemia - in whom iptacopan showed superiority to anti-C5 therapy - and in patients who had not received complement inhibitors. (Funded by Novartis; APPLY-PNH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04558918; APPOINT-PNH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04820530.).

Design and Rationale of the APPELHUS Phase 3 Open-Label Study of Factor B Inhibitor Iptacopan for Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Introduction

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare, progressive, and life-threatening form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) which is caused by dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway (AP). Complement inhibition is an effective therapeutic strategy in aHUS, though current therapies require intravenous administration and increase the risk of infection by encapsulated organisms, including meningococcal infection. Further studies are required to define the optimal duration of existing therapies, and to identify new agents that are convenient for long-term administration. Iptacopan (LNP023) is an oral, first-in-class, highly potent, proximal AP inhibitor that specifically binds factor B (FB). In phase 2 studies of IgA nephropathy, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and C3 glomerulopathy, iptacopan inhibited the AP, showed clinically relevant benefits, and was well tolerated. Iptacopan thus has the potential to become an effective and safe treatment for aHUS, with the convenience of oral administration.

Methods

Alternative Pathway Phase III to Evaluate LNP023 in aHUS (APPELHUS; NCT04889430) is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iptacopan in patients (N = 50) with primary complement-mediated aHUS naïve to complement inhibitor therapy (including anti-C5). Eligible patients must have evidence of TMA (platelet count <150 × 10⁹/l, lactate dehydrogenase ≥1.5 × upper limit of normal, hemoglobin ≤ lower limit of normal, serum creatinine ≥ upper limit of normal) and will receive iptacopan 200 mg twice daily. The primary objective is to assess the proportion of patients achieving complete TMA response without the use of plasma exchange or infusion or anti-C5 antibody during 26 weeks of iptacopan treatment.

Conclusion

APPELHUS will determine if iptacopan is safe and efficacious in patients with aHUS.

Population pharmacokinetics of serelaxin in patients with acute or chronic heart failure, hepatic or renal impairment, or portal hypertension and in healthy subjects

AIMS

Serelaxin is a recombinant human relaxin-2 peptide being developed for the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF). The present analyses aimed to evaluate serelaxin pharmacokinetics following intravenous administration and to identify covariates that may explain pharmacokinetic variability in healthy subjects and patients.

METHODS

Serum concentration-time data for 613 subjects from nine phase I and II studies were analysed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model to estimate population pharmacokinetics and identify significant covariates. A quantile regression analysis was also conducted to assess the relationship between clearance and covariates by including sparse data from a phase III study.

RESULTS

A three-compartment disposition model was established to describe serelaxin pharmacokinetics. Three out of 23 covariates, including baseline body mass index (BMI) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and study A1201, were identified as significant covariates for clearance but with a moderate impact on steady-state concentration, reducing the intersubject variability from 44% in the base model to 41% in the final model with covariates. The steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) was higher in patients with AHF (544 ml kg^-1 ) or chronic heart failure (434 ml kg^-1 ), compared with typical nonheart failure subjects (347 ml kg^-1 ). Quantile regression analysis showed that a 20% increase in BMI or a 20% decrease in eGFR decreased serelaxin clearance by 9.2% or 5.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HF showed higher Vss but similar clearance (and therefore steady-state exposure) vs. non nonheart failure subjects. BMI and eGFR were identified as the main covariates explaining intersubject variability in clearance; however, the impact of these covariates on steady-state concentration was moderate and therefore unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Proportional pulse pressure relates to cardiac index in stabilized acute heart failure patients

AIMS

In chronic heart failure, proportional pulse pressure (PPP) is suggested as an estimate of cardiac index (CI). The association between CI and PPP in acute heart failure (AHF) has not been described.

METHODS

This was examined using hemodynamic measurements (from a trial using serelaxin) in 63 stabilized AHF patients.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age was 68 (11), 74% male, mean (SD) ejection fraction (EF) was 33.4% (13.7), mean (SD) CI (L/min/m²) was 2.3 (0.6). CI correlated with PPP (Pearson R = 0.42; p < 0.0001) based on a linear mixed-effects model analysis of 171 pairs of measurements from 47 patients (out of 63) where CI and PPP were measured within 3 min of each other during. Serelaxin treatment did not modify the established correlation between CI and PPP. Time-weighted average CI correlated with time-weighted average PPP (Spearman Rank R = 0.35; p = 0.0051) over the -4 h to 24 h time interval. In a multivariable regression analysis, low PPP was an independent predictor of low CI (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AHF after initial clinical stabilization, both baseline and post-baseline CI measurements are positively related to PPP. This was the most closely related non-invasive blood pressure variable to CI.

Pharmacokinetics of serelaxin in patients with hepatic impairment: a single-dose, open-label, parallel group study

AIMS

Serelaxin is a recombinant form of human relaxin-2 in development for treatment of acute heart failure. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of serelaxin in patients with hepatic impairment. Secondary objectives included evaluation of immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of serelaxin.

METHODS

This was an open-label, parallel group study (NCT01433458) comparing the PK of serelaxin following a single 24 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion (30 μg kg(-1)  day(-1) ) between patients with mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A, B, C) and healthy matched controls. Blood sampling and standard safety assessments were conducted. Primary non-compartmental PK parameters [including area under the serum concentration-time curve AUC(0-48 h) and AUC(0-∞) and serum concentration at 24 h post-dose (C24h )] were compared between each hepatic impairment group and healthy controls.

RESULTS

A total of 49 subjects (including 25 patients with hepatic impairment) were enrolled, of which 48 subjects completed the study. In all groups, the serum concentration of serelaxin increased over the first few hours of infusion, reached steady-state at 12-24 h and then declined following completion of infusion, with a mean terminal half-life of 7-8 h. All PK parameter estimates were comparable between each group of patients with hepatic impairment and healthy controls. No serious adverse events, discontinuations due to adverse events or deaths were reported. No serelaxin treatment-related antibodies developed during this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK and safety profile of serelaxin were not affected by hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is needed for serelaxin treatment of 48 h i.v. infusion in patients with hepatic impairment.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction assessment of LCZ696 (an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor) with omeprazole, metformin or levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol in healthy subjects

LCZ696 is a novel angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in development for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Here, we assessed the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction of LCZ696 (400 mg, single dose or once daily [q.d.]) when co-administered with omeprazole 40 mg q.d. (n = 28) or metformin 1000 mg q.d. (n = 27) or levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol 150/30 μg single dose (n = 24) in three separate open-label, single-sequence studies in healthy subjects. Pharmacokinetic parameters of LCZ696 analytes (sacubitril, LBQ657, and valsartan), metformin, and levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol were assessed. Omeprazole did not alter the AUCinf of sacubitril and pharmacokinetics of LBQ657; however, 7% decrease in the Cmax of sacubitril, and 11% and 13% decreases in AUCinf and Cmax of valsartan were observed. Co-administration of LCZ696 with metformin had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of LBQ657 and valsartan; however, AUCtau,ss and Cmax,ss of metformin were decreased by 23%. Co-administration of LCZ696 with levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and LBQ657 or AUCinf of levonorgestrel. The Cmax of levonorgestrel decreased by 15%, and AUCtau,ss and Cmax,ss of valsartan decreased by 14% and 16%, respectively. Co-administration of LCZ696 with omeprazole, metformin, or levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol was not associated with any clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions.

Pharmacokinetics of serelaxin in patients with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis: A single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study

Serelaxin, a recombinant human relaxin-2 hormone, is in clinical development for treating acute heart failure. This open-label, parallel-group study investigated serelaxin pharmacokinetics (PK) after a single 4-hour intravenous infusion (10 µg/kg) in patients with severe renal impairment (n = 6) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis (PK on the day of dialysis [n = 6] or during dialysis-free interval [n = 6]), compared with matched healthy subjects (n = 18). In all participants, serum serelaxin concentration peaked at the end of infusion and subsequently declined with mean terminal elimination half-life of 6.5-8.8 hours. Compared with healthy subjects, a moderate decrease in serelaxin systemic clearance (37%-52%) and increase in its exposure (30%-115%) were observed in all patients. During the 4-hour hemodialysis in ESRD patients, 30% serelaxin was removed, with hemodialysis clearance constituting approximately 52% of total systemic clearance. Serelaxin was well tolerated with no deaths, serious adverse events (AE), or AE-related discontinuations. Antiserelaxin antibodies were not detected in any participant. Given the shallow dose-response relationship observed with serelaxin in clinical studies and its wide therapeutic window, the observed PK differences in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy subjects are unlikely to pose a safety risk and do not warrant a predefined dosage adjustment in such patients.

Safety and tolerability of serelaxin, a recombinant human relaxin-2 in development for the treatment of acute heart failure, in healthy Japanese volunteers and a comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy Japanese and Caucasian populations

Serelaxin, a recombinant form of the human relaxin-2 hormone, is currently under clinical investigation for treatment of acute heart failure. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study investigated the effect of Japanese ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety and tolerability of serelaxin. Japanese healthy subjects (n = 32) received 10, 30, or 100 µg/kg/day of serelaxin, or placebo, administered as a 48-hour intravenous infusion. A Caucasian cohort (n = 8) receiving 30 µg/kg/day open-label serelaxin was included for comparison. In all subjects, serum serelaxin concentrations increased rapidly after the start of infusion, approached steady state as early as 4 hours, and declined rapidly upon treatment cessation. Serum exposure to serelaxin increased with increasing doses. Statistical dose proportionality was shown for AUC(inf) over the entire dose range. A significant increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to Day 2 (30 and 100 µg/kg/day) and to Day 3 (10 and 100 µg/kg/day) was observed compared with placebo. Serelaxin was well tolerated by all subjects. In conclusion, PK, PD, and safety profiles of serelaxin were generally comparable between Japanese and Caucasian subjects, suggesting that no dose adjustment will be required in Japanese subjects during routine clinical use of this agent.

Renal hemodynamic effects of serelaxin in patients with chronic heart failure: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Serelaxin is a promising therapy for acute heart failure. The renal hemodynamic effects of serelaxin in patients with chronic heart failure are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, patients with New York Heart Association Class II to III chronic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 30 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) received intravenous serelaxin 30 μg/kg per day or placebo for 24 hours. Primarily, we assessed the difference between serelaxin and placebo on renal plasma flow (para-aminohippuric acid clearance) and GFR (iothalamate clearance) over 8 to 24 hours. All 22 patients from 1 clinical site were excluded from primary analyses before unblinding because of implausible measurements. The primary analysis comprised 65 patients, mean age was 68 (±10) years, 89% were male, mean estimated GFR was 64 (±19) mL/min per 1.73 m(2), and 34% had New York Heart Association Class III symptoms. Renal plasma flow increased by 29% with serelaxin and 14% with placebo (13% relative increase with serelaxin; P=0.0386), whereas GFR changes did not differ significantly during 8 to 24 hours. Filtration fraction increased by 36% with serelaxin and 62% with placebo (16% relative decrease with serelaxin; P=0.0019) during 8 to 24 hours. Changes in systolic blood pressure were largely similar, and creatinine clearance did not differ between groups. Adverse event rates were similar with serelaxin (20.5%) and placebo (25.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic heart failure, serelaxin increased renal plasma flow and reduced the increase in filtration fraction compared with placebo, but did not affect GFR. These results suggest beneficial renal hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic heart failure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01546532.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to assess haemodynamic effects of serelaxin in patients with acute heart failure

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the haemodynamic effects of serelaxin (30 µg/kg/day 20-h infusion and 4-h post-infusion period) in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods and results

This double-blind, multicentre study randomized 71 AHF patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥18 mmHg, systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥115 mmHg, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m² to serelaxin (n = 34) or placebo (n = 37) within 48 h of hospitalization. Co-primary endpoints were peak change from baseline in PCWP and cardiac index (CI) during the first 8 h of infusion. Among 63 patients eligible for haemodynamic analysis (serelaxin, n = 32; placebo, n = 31), those treated with serelaxin had a significantly higher decrease in peak PCWP during the first 8 h of infusion (difference vs. placebo: −2.44 mmHg, P = 0.004). Serelaxin showed no significant effect on the peak change in CI vs. placebo. Among secondary haemodynamic endpoints, a highly significant reduction in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was observed throughout the serelaxin infusion (largest difference in mean PAP vs. placebo: −5.17 mmHg at 4 h, P < 0.0001). Right atrial pressure, systemic/pulmonary vascular resistance, and systolic/diastolic BP decreased from baseline with serelaxin vs. placebo and treatment differences reached statistical significance at some time points. Serelaxin administration improved renal function and decreased N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels vs. placebo. Treatment with serelaxin was well tolerated with no apparent safety concerns.

Conclusion

The haemodynamic effects of serelaxin observed in the present study provide plausible mechanistic support for improvement in signs and symptoms of congestion observed with this agent in AHF patients.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01543854.

[Surgical management of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal origin]

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is found in approximately 15 % of patients with colorectal cancer during the course of their disease, and is associated with a poor prognosis. Even more patients with gastric cancer develop peritoneal seeding. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been introduced in the past decade and have led to 5-year survival rates of 30 to 40 % for selected patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis. These numbers have been demonstrated by many retrospective analyses and by prospective Phase II studies. The clinical assessment to select patients who will benefit from the combined therapy and achievement of complete macroscopic cytoreduction both play a crucial role. Less favourabale results have been achieved for patients suffering from stage IV gastric cancer with peritoneal seeding. Promising results were demonstrated for postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy following curative gastrectomy. Patients with hepatic, biliary and pancreatic cancers and peritoneal carcinomatosis do not benefit from cytoreductive surgery. There is a need for further multicentre, prospective trials analysing the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. They should be conducted in the specialised centres by interdisciplinary teams.