A phase I study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06939999 (PRMT5 inhibitor) in patients with selected advanced or metastatic tumors with high incidence of splicing factor gene mutations

BACKGROUND

Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) methylates multiple substrates dysregulated in cancer, including spliceosome machinery components. PF-06939999 is a selective small-molecule PRMT5 inhibitor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I dose-escalation and -expansion trial (NCT03854227) enrolled patients with selected solid tumors. PF-06939999 was administered orally once or twice a day (q.d./b.i.d.) in 28-day cycles. The objectives were to evaluate PF-06939999 safety and tolerability to identify maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended part 2 dose (RP2D), and assess pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics [changes in plasma symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) levels], and antitumor activities.

RESULTS

In part 1 dose escalation, 28 patients received PF-06939999 (0.5 mg q.d. to 6 mg b.i.d.). Four of 24 (17%) patients reported dose-limiting toxicities: thrombocytopenia (n = 2, 6 mg b.i.d.), anemia (n = 1, 8 mg q.d.), and neutropenia (n = 1, 6 mg q.d.). PF-06939999 exposure increased with dose. Steady-state PK was achieved by day 15. Plasma SDMA was reduced at steady state (58%-88%). Modulation of plasma SDMA was dose dependent. No MTD was determined. In part 2 dose expansion, 26 patients received PF-06939999 6 mg q.d. (RP2D). Overall (part 1 + part 2), the most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events included anemia (28%), thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased (22%), fatigue (6%), and neutropenia (4%). Three patients (6.8%) had confirmed partial response (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, n = 1; non-small-cell lung cancer, n = 2), and 19 (43.2%) had stable disease. No predictive biomarkers were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

PF-06939999 demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and objective clinical responses in a subset of patients, suggesting that PRMT5 is an interesting cancer target with clinical validation. However, no predictive biomarker was identified. The role of PRMT5 in cancer biology is complex and requires further preclinical, mechanistic investigation to identify predictive biomarkers for patient selection.

A lack of association between BMI and chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Secondary analysis of the IMpower150 and IMpower130 clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have indicated that patients with high body mass index (BMI) may have favourable survival outcomes following treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). However, this evidence is limited by several factors, notably the minimal evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the use of categorised BMI with inconsistent cut point definitions, and minimal investigation of contemporary combination ICI therapy. Moreover, whether overweight and obese patients gain a larger benefit from contemporary frontline chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear.

METHODS

This secondary analysis pooled individual patient data from the intention-to-treat population of the IMpower130 and IMpower150 RCTs comparing chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy. Co-primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The potentially non-linear relationship between BMI and chemoimmunotherapy treatment effect was evaluated using Multivariable Fractional Polynomial Interaction (MFPI). As a sensitivity analysis, chemoimmunotherapy treatment effect (chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy) on survival was also estimated for each BMI subgroup defined by World Health Organisation classification. Exploratory analyses in the respective chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy cohort were undertaken to examine the survival outcomes among BMI subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 1282 patients were included. From the MFPI analysis, BMI was not significantly associated with chemoimmunotherapy treatment effect with respect to either OS (p = 0.71) or PFS (p = 0.35). This was supported by the sensitivity analyses that demonstrated no significant treatment effect improvement in OS/PFS among overweight or obese patients compared to normal weight patients (OS: normal BMI HR = 0.74 95% CI 0.59-0.93, overweight HR = 0.78 95% CI 0.61-1.01, obese HR = 0.84 95% CI 0.59-1.20). Exploratory analyses further highlighted that survival outcomes were not significantly different across BMI subgroups in either the chemoimmunotherapy therapy cohort (Median OS: normal BMI 19.9 months, overweight 17.9 months, and obese 19.5 months, p = 0.7) or the chemotherapy cohort (Median OS: normal 14.1 months, overweight 15.9 months, and obese 16.7 months, p = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

There was no association between high BMI (overweight or obese individuals) and enhanced chemoimmunotherapy treatment benefit in front-line treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. This contrasts with previous publications that showed a superior treatment benefit in overweight and obese patients treated with immunotherapy given without chemotherapy.

Combined use of CYFRA 21-1 and CA 125 predicts survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC and stable disease in IMpower150

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and stable disease (SD) have an unmet clinical need to help guide early treatment adjustments.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential of tumor biomarkers to inform on survival outcomes in NSCLC SD patients.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included 480 patients from the IMpower150 study with metastatic NSCLC, treated with chemotherapy, atezolizumab and bevacizumab combinations, who had SD at first CT scan (post-treatment initiation). Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS] outcomes) based on serum tumor biomarker levels.

RESULTS

The CYFRA 21-1 and CA 125 biomarker combination predicted OS and PFS in patients with SD. Risk of death was ~4-fold higher for the biomarker-stratified high-risk versus low-risk SD patients (hazard ratio [HR] 3.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.02-4.78; p < 0.0001). OS in patients with the low- and high-risk SD was comparable to that in patients with the CT-defined partial response (PR; HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.898-1.34) and progressive disease (PD) (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.621-1.77), respectively. The findings were similar with PFS, and consistent across treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarker testing shows potential for providing prognostic information to help direct treatment in NSCLC patients with SD. Prospective clinical studies are warranted.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02366143.

A phase II clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of durvalumab as first line therapy in advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2

Background

Approximately 30-40% of patients with advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with an impaired performance status (PS). There are limited prospective data on the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in these patients.

Methods

In this single-arm phase II clinical trial (NCT02879617), patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2 received durvalumab 1500 mg every 28 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety determined by grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Findings

Between April 2017 and March 2021, 50 patients were enrolled, of whom 47 received durvalumab. With a median follow-up of 28 months, median OS was 6 months (95% CI 4-10). TRAEs grade 3 occurred in nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI 9%-33%). OS in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 0, 1-49%, and ≥50% was six months (95% CI 3-15), 11 months (95% CI 4-16), and 11 months (95% CI 0-not reached (NR)), respectively. Health related quality of life (HQRL) assessed at baseline and during therapy demonstrated no statistically significant change over the course of treatment.

Interpretation

This study demonstrates that single agent durvalumab is safe and well tolerated in the 1st line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2, with an encouraging OS benefit in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors. This trial is amongst the largest prospective studies evaluating durvalumab in the 1st line treatment of advanced stage NSCLC and a PS of 2.

Funding

AstraZeneca, NCI P30CA047904.

Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring on Chemo-immunotherapy for Risk Stratification in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Chemoimmunotherapy (chemoIO) is a prevalent first-line treatment for advanced driver-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with maintenance therapy given after induction. However, there is significant clinical variability in the duration, dosing, and timing of maintenance therapy after induction chemoIO. We used circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring to inform outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving chemoIO.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This retrospective study included 221 patients from a phase III trial of atezolizumab+carboplatin+nab-paclitaxel versus carboplatin+nab-paclitaxel in squamous NSCLC (IMpower131). ctDNA monitoring used the FoundationOne Tracker involving comprehensive genomic profiling of pretreatment tumor tissue, variant selection using an algorithm to exclude nontumor variants, and multiplex PCR of up to 16 variants to detect and quantify ctDNA.

RESULTS

ctDNA was detected (ctDNA+) in 96% of pretreatment samples (median, 93 mean tumor molecules/mL), and similar ctDNA dynamics were noted across treatment arms during chemoIO. ctDNA decrease from baseline to C4D1 was associated with improved outcomes across multiple cutoffs for patients treated with chemoIO. When including patients with missing plasma or ctDNA- at baseline, patients with ctDNA- at C4D1 (clearance), had more favorable progression-free survival (median 8.8 vs. 3.5 months; HR, 0.32;0.20-0.52) and OS (median not reached vs. 8.9 months; HR, 0.22; 0.12-0.39) from C4D1 than ctDNA+ patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA monitoring during induction chemoIO can inform treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC. Importantly, monitoring remains feasible and informative for patients missing baseline ctDNA. ctDNA testing during induction chemoIO identifies patients at higher risk for disease progression and may inform patient selection for novel personalized maintenance or second-line treatment strategies.

Population Pharmacokinetics of MYL-1402O, a Proposed Biosimilar to Bevacizumab and Reference Product (Avastin®) in Patients with Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

MYL-1402O is a bevacizumab (Avastin®) biosimilar. Pharmacokinetic and safety similarity of MYL-1402O and reference Avastin® authorized in the European Union (EU-Avastin®) and the US (US-Avastin®) was demonstrated in healthy subjects (phase I, NCT02469987). The key objectives of this study were to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model on pooled data from the phase I and phase III clinical studies to assess pharmacokinetic linearity of MYL-1402O and Avastin® across dose ranges, to assess the pharmacokinetic similarity of MYL-1402O and Avastin® in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC), and to explore potential covariates to account for systematic sources of variability in bevacizumab exposure.

METHODS

Efficacy and safety of MYL-1402O compared with EU-Avastin® was investigated in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in patients with stage IV nsNSCLC (phase III, NCT04633564). PopPK models were developed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach (NONMEM® 7.3.0).

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of Avastin® and MYL-1402O were adequately described with a two-compartment linear model. Fourteen covariates were found to be statistically significant predictors of bevacizumab pharmacokinectics. The impact of each covariate on area under the concentration-time curve, half-life, and maximum plasma concentration was modest, and ranges were similar between the treatment groups, MYL-1402O and EU-Avastin®, in patients with nsNSCLC. The pharmacokinectics of bevacizumab appeared to be linear.

CONCLUSIONS

PopPK analysis revealed no significant differences between pharmacokinetics of MYL-1402O and Avastin® in patients with nsNSCLC. The developed PopPK model was considered robust, as it adequately described bevacizumab pharmacokinetics in healthy participants and nsNSCLC patients.

Phase II Randomized Trial of Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, and Bevacizumab With and Without Atezolizumab in Stage IV Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Harbor a Sensitizing EGFR Mutation or Have Never Smoked

INTRODUCTION

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have never smoked or have tumors with mutations in EGFR generally derive minimal benefit from single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. Prior data indicate that adding PD-L1 inhibition to anti-VEGF and cytotoxic chemotherapy may be a promising approach to overcoming immunotherapy resistance in these patients, however prospective validation is needed. This trial in progress (NCT03786692) is evaluating patients with stage IV NSCLC who have never smoked or who have tumors with sensitizing EGFR alterations to determine if a 4-drug combination of atezolizumab, carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab can improve outcomes compared to carboplatin, pemetrexed and bevacizumab without atezolizumab.

METHODS

This is a randomized, phase II, multicenter study evaluating carboplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab with and without atezolizumab in 117 patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. Randomization is 2 to 1 favoring the atezolizumab containing arm. Eligible patients include: 1) those with tumors with sensitizing EGFR alterations in exons 19 or 21 or 2) patients who have never smoked and have wild-type tumors (ie, no EGFR, ALK or ROS1 alterations). Patients are defined as having never smoked if they have smoked less than 100 cigarettes in a lifetime. Patients with EGFR-mutated tumors must have disease progression or intolerance to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), response rate, duration of response, and time to response.

CONCLUSION

This phase II trial is accruing patients at U.S. sites through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The trial opened in August 2019 and accrual is expected to be completed in the Fall of 2024.

Pan-tumor survey of RET fusions as detected by next-generation RNA sequencing identified RET fusion positive colorectal carcinoma as a unique molecular subset

BACKGROUND

RET fusions are driver alterations in cancer and are most commonly found in non-small cell lung cancer and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. However, RET fusion have been reported in other solid tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of RET+ solid malignancies identified by targeted RNA sequencing and whole transcriptome sequencing of clinical tumor samples performed at Caris Life Science (Phoenix, AZ).

RESULTS

As of March 22, 2022, a total of 378 RET+ solid malignancies were identified in 15 different tumor types and carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) that underwent next-generation RNA sequencing. RET+ NSCLC and RET+ thyroid cancer constituted 66.9% and 11.1% of the RET+ solid malignancies, respectively. RET+ colorectal adenocarcinoma and RET+ breast adenocarcinoma constituted 10.1% and 2.6%, respectively. The estimated frequency of RET fusions within specific tumor types were NSCLC 0.7%, thyroid cancer 3.1%, colorectal cancer 0.2% and breast cancer 0.1%. KIF5B (46.8%) was the most common fusion partner followed by CCDC6 (28.3%) and NCOA4 (13.8%) in RET+ solid tumors. KIF5B-RET was the dominant fusion variant in RET+ NSCLC, NCOA4-RET was the dominant variant in RET+ colorectal carcinoma, and CCDC6-RET was the dominant variant in thyroid cancer. The most common single gene alterations in RET+ tumors were TP53 (34.8%), RASA1 (14.3%) and ARIAD1A (11.6%). RET+ CRC had a high median TMB of 20.0 and were commonly MSI-H.

CONCLUSIONS

RET fusions were identified in multiple tumor types. With a higher median TMB and commonly MSI-H, RET fusion positive CRC may be a unique molecular subset of CRC.

Safety, Tolerability, and Antitumor Activity of Zipalertinib Among Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertions

PURPOSE

Although several agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, toxicities related to the inhibition of wild-type (WT) EGFR are common with these agents and affect overall tolerability. Zipalertinib (CLN-081, TAS6417) is an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a novel pyrrolopyrimidine scaffold leading to enhanced selectivity for EGFR ex20ins-mutant versus WT EGFR with potent inhibition of cell growth in EGFR ex20ins-positive cell lines.

METHODS

This phase 1/2a study of zipalertinib enrolled patients with recurrent or metastatic EGFR ex20ins-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were treated with zipalertinib at dose levels including 30, 45, 65, 100, and 150 mg orally twice a day. Patients were predominantly female (56%), had a median age of 64 years, and were heavily pretreated (median previous systemic therapies 2, range 1-9). Thirty six percent of patients had received previous non-ex20ins EGFR TKIs and 3/73 (4.1%) patients received previous EGFR ex20ins TKIs. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events of any grade included rash (80%), paronychia (32%), diarrhea (30%), and fatigue (21%). No cases of grade 3 or higher drug-related rash or diarrhea were observed at 100 mg twice a day or below. Objective responses occurred across all zipalertinib dose levels tested, with confirmed partial response (PR) observed in 28/73 (38.4%) response-evaluable patients. Confirmed PRs were seen in 16/39 (41%) response-evaluable patients at the dose of 100 mg twice a day.

CONCLUSION

Zipalertinib has encouraging preliminary antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC, with an acceptable safety profile, including low frequency of high-grade diarrhea and rash.

Impact of gender and mutational differences in hormone receptor expressing non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The incidence of lung cancer in the US has been decreasing but a bigger decline has been observed in men despite similar declines in tobacco use between men and women. Multiple theories have been proposed, including exposure to exogenous estrogens. Our study seeks to understand the relationship between hormone receptors (HR), gender, and the genomic landscape of non-small lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

3,256 NSCLC tumor samples submitted for molecular profiling between 2013-2018 were retrospectively identified and assessed for HR expression. Hormone receptor (HR+) was defined as ≥ 1% nuclear staining of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-a) or progesterone receptor (PR) by immunohistochemistry. DNA sequencing by NGS included cases sequenced by the Illumina MiSeq hot spot 47 gene panel (n=2753) and Illumina NextSeq 592 gene panel (n=503). An adjusted p-value (q-value) <0.05 was determined significant.

Results

HR+ was identified in 18.3% of NSCLC. HR+ occurred more commonly in women compared to men (19.6% vs 11.4%, p <0.0001, q <0.0001). EGFR mutations occurred more commonly in HR+ NSCLC than HR- NSCLC (20.2% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.002, q=0.007). Overall, men with EGFR mutations were affected by HR status with a higher prevalence in HR+ NSCLC while such differences were not seen in women. However, in women ages ≤45, there was a trend towards greater prevalence HR+ NSCLC (25.25% vs. 11.32%, q= 0.0942) and 10/25 (40.0%) of HR+ cases in young women were found to be EGFR mutated. KRAS mutations and ALK+ IHC expression occurred more in HR+ NSCLC whereas TP53 mutations occurred more in HR- NSCLC.

Conclusions

Women were more likely to have HR+ NSCLC than men and EGFR and KRAS mutations occurred more commonly in HR+ NSCLC. Additional studies with more strict inclusion criteria for HR+ are warranted to see if there is benefit to targeting HR in these subgroups.

Emerging agents for the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations with progression on first-line therapy

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, have emerged as the standard of care first-line treatment option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Despite significant improvements in patient outcomes with these regimens, primary or acquired resistance is common and most patients develop disease progression, resulting in poor survival.

AREAS COVERED

We review the current treatments commonly used for NSCLC without AGAs in the first-line and subsequent settings and describe the unmet needs for these patients in the second-line setting, including a lack of standard definitions for primary and required resistance, and few effective treatment options for patients who develop progression of their disease on first-line therapy. We describe key mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and emerging therapies that are being investigated for patients who develop progression on ICIs and platinum-based chemotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging agents in development have a variety of different mechanisms of action and will likely change standard of care for second-line therapy and beyond for patients with NSCLC without AGAs in the future.

A longitudinal circulating tumor DNA-based model associated with survival in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

One of the great challenges in therapeutic oncology is determining who might achieve survival benefits from a particular therapy. Studies on longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics for the prediction of survival have generally been small or nonrandomized. We assessed ctDNA across 5 time points in 466 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from the randomized phase 3 IMpower150 study comparing chemotherapy-immune checkpoint inhibitor (chemo-ICI) combinations and used machine learning to jointly model multiple ctDNA metrics to predict overall survival (OS). ctDNA assessments through cycle 3 day 1 of treatment enabled risk stratification of patients with stable disease (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.2 (2.0-5.3), P < 0.001; median 7.1 versus 22.3 months for high- versus low-intermediate risk) and with partial response (HR = 3.3 (1.7-6.4), P < 0.001; median 8.8 versus 28.6 months). The model also identified high-risk patients in an external validation cohort from the randomized phase 3 OAK study of ICI versus chemo in NSCLC (OS HR = 3.73 (1.83-7.60), P = 0.00012). Simulations of clinical trial scenarios employing our ctDNA model suggested that early ctDNA testing outperforms early radiographic imaging for predicting trial outcomes. Overall, measuring ctDNA dynamics during treatment can improve patient risk stratification and may allow early differentiation between competing therapies during clinical trials.

Poziotinib in Treatment-Naïve Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring HER2 Exon 20 Mutations: ZENITH20-4, A Multicenter, Multicohort, Open-label Phase 2 Trial (Cohort 4)

INTRODUCTION

Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (ERBB2 or HER2) alterations are found in approximately 2-5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs); the majority are exon 20 insertion mutations. The efficacy and safety of poziotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were assessed in treatment-naïve NSCLC patients whose tumors harbor HER2 exon 20 insertions.

METHODS

ZENITH20 is an open-label, multicohort, multicenter global phase 2 trial. ZENITH20-C4 enrolled treatment-naïve NSCLC patients with tumors harboring HER2 exon 20 insertions. Poziotinib was administered 16 mg once daily (QD) or 8 mg twice daily (BID). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (16 mg QD, n=47; 8 mg BID, n=33) were treated in ZENITH20-C4. ORR was 39% (95% CI, 28%-50%; 31/80), with a DCR of 73% (95% CI, 61%-82%; 58/80); 80% of patients experienced tumor reduction. Median DoR was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.6-11.9 months), and median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 5.4-7.3 months). The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash (QD, 45%; BID, 39%), stomatitis (QD, 21%; BID, 15%), and diarrhea (QD, 15%; BID, 21%). Among all subtypes of HER2 exon 20 insertions, 7 patients (9%) harboring tumors with G778_P780dupGSP had the best clinical outcomes (ORR, 71%).

CONCLUSIONS

Poziotinib demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy with a manageable toxicity profile for treatment-naïve NSCLC patients harboring HER2 exon 20 mutations.

Tumor Dynamic Model-Based Decision Support for Phase Ib/II Combination Studies: A Retrospective Assessment Based on Resampling of the Phase III Study IMpower150

PURPOSE

Model-based tumor growth inhibition (TGI) metrics are increasingly incorporated into go/no-go decisions in early clinical studies. To apply this methodology to new investigational combinations requires independent evaluation of TGI metrics in recently completed Phase III trials of effective immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from IMpower150, a positive, randomized, Phase III study of first-line therapy in 1,202 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We resampled baseline characteristics and longitudinal sum of longest diameters of tumor lesions of patients from both arms, atezolizumab+ bevacizumab+chemotherapy (ABCP) versus BCP, to mimic Phase Ib/II studies of 15 to 40 patients/arm with 6 to 24 weeks follow-up. TGI metrics were estimated using a bi-exponential TGI model. Effect sizes were calculated as TGI metrics geometric mean ratio (GMR), objective response rate (ORR) difference (d), and progression-free survival (PFS), hazard ratio (HR) between arms. Correct and incorrect go decisions were evaluated as the probability to achieve desired effect sizes in ABCP versus BCP and BCP versus BCP, respectively, across 500 replicated subsamples for each design.

RESULTS

For 40 patients/24 weeks follow-up, correct go decisions based on probability tumor growth rate (KG) GMR <0.90, dORR >0.10, and PFS HR <0.70 were 83%, 69%, and 58% with incorrect go decision rates of 4%, 12%, and 11%, respectively. For other designs, the ranking did not change with TGI metrics consistently overperforming RECIST endpoints. The predicted overall survival (OS) HR was around 0.80 in most of the scenarios investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Model-based estimate of KG GMR is an exploratory endpoint that informs early clinical decisions for combination studies.

Low Risk of Hyperprogression with First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analysis of 7 Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Monotherapy immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) used in second- or later-line settings has been reported to induce hyperprogression. This study evaluated hyperprogression risk with ICI (atezolizumab) in the first-, second-, or later-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and provides insights into hyperprogression risk with contemporary first-line ICI treatment.

METHODS

Hyperprogression was identified using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST)-based criteria in a dataset of pooled individual-participant level data from BIRCH, FIR, IMpower130, IMpower131, IMpower150, OAK, and POPLAR trials. Odds ratios were computed to compare hyperprogression risks between groups. Landmark Cox proportional-hazard regression was used to evaluate the association between hyperprogression and progression-free survival/overall survival. Secondarily, putative risk factors for hyperprogression among second- or later-line atezolizumab-treated patients were evaluated using univariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of the included 4644 patients, 119 of the atezolizumab-treated patients (n = 3129) experienced hyperprogression. Hyperprogression risk was markedly lower with first-line atezolizumab-either chemoimmunotherapy or monotherapy-compared to second/later-line atezolizumab monotherapy (0.7% vs. 8.8%, OR = 0.07, 95% CI, 0.04-0.13). Further, there was no statistically significant difference in hyperprogression risk with first-line atezolizumab-chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (0.6% vs. 1.0%, OR = 0.55, 95% CI, 0.22-1.36). Sensitivity analyses using an extended RECIST-based criteria including early death supported these findings. Hyperprogression was associated with worsened overall survival (HR = 3.4, 95% CI, 2.7-4.2, P < .001); elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was the strongest risk factor for hyperprogression (C-statistic = 0.62, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents first evidence for a markedly lower hyperprogression risk in advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line ICI, particularly with chemoimmunotherapy, as compared to second- or later-line ICI treatment.

Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events With Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analyses of the Phase 3 IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150 Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) arising from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer therapy may potentially predict improved outcomes.

Objective

To evaluate the association between irAEs and atezolizumab efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using pooled data from 3 phase 3 ICI studies.

Design, Setting, and Participants

IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150 were phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoimmunotherapy combinations involving atezolizumab. Participants were chemotherapy-naive adults with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. These post hoc analyses were conducted during February 2022.

Interventions

Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive atezolizumab with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel, or chemotherapy alone (IMpower130); 1:1 to receive atezolizumab with carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed, or chemotherapy alone (IMpower132); and 1:1:1 to receive atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, or bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (IMpower150).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Pooled data from IMpower130 (cutoff: March 15, 2018), IMpower132 (cutoff: May 22, 2018), and IMpower150 (cutoff: September 13, 2019) were analyzed by treatment (atezolizumab-containing vs control), irAE status (with vs without), and highest irAE grade (1-2 vs 3-5). To account for immortal bias, a time-dependent Cox model and landmark analyses of irAE occurrence at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months from baseline were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 2503 randomized patients, 1577 were in the atezolizumab-containing arm and 926 were in the control arm. The mean (SD) age of patients was 63.1 (9.4) years and 63.0 (9.3) years, and 950 (60.2%) and 569 (61.4%) were male, respectively, in the atezolizumab arm and the control arm. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between patients with irAEs (atezolizumab, n = 753; control, n = 289) and without (atezolizumab, n = 824; control, n = 637). In the atezolizumab arm, OS HRs (95% CI) in patients with grade 1 to 2 irAEs and grade 3 to 5 irAEs (each vs those without irAEs) in the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month subgroups were 0.78 (0.65-0.94) and 1.25 (0.90-1.72), 0.74 (0.63-0.87) and 1.23 (0.93-1.64), 0.77 (0.65-0.90) and 1.1 (0.81-1.42), and 0.72 (0.59-0.89) and 0.87 (0.61-1.25), respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this pooled analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials, longer OS was observed in patients with vs without mild to moderate irAEs in both arms and across landmarks. These findings further support the use of first-line atezolizumab-containing regimens for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02367781, NCT02657434, and NCT02366143.

Guidance for clinicians and patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the time of precision medicine

Major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have resulted in a sharp decline in associated mortality rates, thereby propelling NSCLC to the forefront of precision medicine. Current guidelines recommend upfront comprehensive molecular testing for all known and actionable driver alterations/biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, KRAS, NTRK, MET, RET, HER2 [ERBB2], and PD-L1), especially in advanced disease stages, as they significantly influence response to therapy. In particular, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (HC-NGS) with an RNA fusion panel to detect gene fusions is a veritable requirement at both diagnosis and progression (resistance) of any-stage non-squamous adenocarcinoma NSCLCs. This testing modality ensures selection of the most timely, appropriate, and personalized treatment, maximization of therapeutic efficacy, and prevention of use of suboptimal/contraindicated therapy. As a complement to clinical testing and treatment, patient, family, and caregiver education is also key to early screening and diagnosis, access to care, coping strategies, positive outcomes, and survival. The advent of social media and increased internet access has amplified the volume of educational and support resources, consequently changing the dynamics of patient care. This review provides guidance on integration of comprehensive genomic testing with an RNA fusion panel as a global diagnostic standard for all adenocarcinoma NSCLC disease stages and provides key information on patient and caregiver education and resources.

A Single Center Retrospective Study of the Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Immune-related Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which may affect the outcome of irAEs. Data are limited regarding the impact of COVID-19 on irAEs in ICI-treated cancer patients. Hence, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed ICI-treated adult patients with malignant solid tumors at a single institution between August 2020 and August 2021. Patients who had the most recent ICI treatment over 1-month before or after the positive COVID-19 test were excluded from the study. For the COVID-19 positive group, only the irAEs that developed after COVID-19 infection were considered as events. A total of 579 patients were included in our study, with 46 (7.9%) in the COVID-19 positive group and 533 (92.1%) in the COVID-19 negative group. The baseline characteristics of patients in the 2 groups were similar. With a median follow-up of 331 days (range: 21-2226), we noticed a nonsignificant higher incidence of all-grade irAEs in the COVID-19 positive group (30.4% vs. 19.9%, P =0.18). The incidence of grade 3 and 4 irAEs was significantly higher in the COVID-19 positive group (10.9% vs. 3.2%, P =0.02). Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between COVID-19 infection and increased risk of severe irAE development (odds ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.14, P =0.01). Our study suggested that COVID-19 may pose a risk of severe irAEs in cancer patients receiving ICIs. Close monitoring and possibly delaying ICI administration could be considered when cancer patients are infected with COVID-19.

Reducing preventable ED visits in patients with advanced NSCLC: Collective insights from three cancer centers

337

Background: While many patients with advanced NSCLC have complex medical needs, emergency department (ED) visits may be preventable if clinicians predict, identify and treat symptoms early and deliver outpatient interventions. The Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) evaluated how cancer centers participating in a multi-phase initiative found ways to reduce preventable ED visits in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: After holding QI workshops, ACCC followed-up with three centers located in AL, OK, and OH. These centers aimed to improve lung cancer symptom management, patient education, and care coordination related to the CMS Measure #OP-35 diagnoses: dehydration, diarrhea, emesis, nausea, pain, or pneumonia. Results: Patient Education and Reminders: Patients who undergo systemic treatment often need to be reminded to call their medical oncology team if they develop symptoms. Examples of effective practices include: a patient education and reminder campaign to “call-first” before visiting the ED; wallet cards with phone numbers; and ongoing reminders whenever patients come for infusion or clinician visits. Intensive Care Coordination: Some patients with advanced NSCLC may be “high risk” for ED utilization (eg, co-morbidities, social determinants, etc.). Intensive care coordination delivered by nurses may be directed specifically at these patients. Interventions may include scheduled phone calls and/or telehealth visits to assess symptoms and coordinate outpatient interventions. Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs): Patients with advanced NSCLC may receive immune checkpoint inhibitors which may cause irAEs. Colitis may lead to dehydration, diarrhea, emesis, nausea; pneumonitis may be misdiagnosed as pneumonia. One center began using a patient symptom questionnaire delivered by a nurse navigator and managed 94% of irAE symptoms in the outpatient setting. Another center surveyed ED providers to assess gaps in identifying irAE symptoms an formed a multidisciplinary irAE work group to discuss patient management and facilitate increased awareness and early recognition. These efforts led to a series of education programs for ED staff. Early Palliative Care: Since early palliative care is associated with reduced ED utilization, one center streamlined palliative care referrals in the outpatient setting by developing an electronic pathway. 91% of patients with advanced cancer enrolled after initial consult; only 24% made an ED visit. Conclusions: While many ED visits are necessary, some may be preventable, especially if members of the multidisciplinary cancer care team risk-stratify patients, proactively identify and empower patients to “call first,” treat symptoms early, and provide early palliative care. The collective insights from these cancer centers provide guidance around sustainable strategies that can potentially reduce preventable ED visits.

The Applicability of the Results in the Asian Population of ORIENT-11 to a Western Population According to the ICH-E5 Framework

Sintilimab combined with pemetrexed and platinum met the primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival (PFS) as a first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase 3 trial ORIENT-11 (NCT03607539). As seen in similar trials, the addition of sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, to chemotherapy improved the PFS without significantly worsening the toxicity, with improvements in response rate and duration of response. In contrast to previous trials, the ORIENT-11 trial was conducted completely in China. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors are important to consider when reviewing foreign clinical trial data, as they may influence the efficacy and the safety outcomes. Here we discuss the applicability of ORIENT-11 clinical results to a Western population.

A phase 1b/2 study of PF-06747775 as monotherapy or in combination with Palbociclib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

This Phase 1/2 study (NCT02349633) explored the safety and antitumor activity of PF-06747775 (oral, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after progression on an EGFR inhibitor.

METHODS

Phase 1 was a dose-escalation study of PF-06747775 monotherapy (starting dose: 25 mg once daily [QD]). Phase 1b/2 evaluated PF-06747775 monotherapy at recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D; Cohort 1); PF-06747775 200 mg QD plus palbociclib (starting dose: 100 mg QD orally; Cohort 2A); and PF-06747775 monotherapy at RP2D in a Japanese lead-in cohort.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were treated. Median treatment duration was 40.1 weeks. Monotherapy maximum tolerated dose was not determined. Two patients in Cohort 2A had dose-limiting toxicities. The monotherapy RP2D was estimated to be 200 mg QD. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (69.2%), paronychia (69.2%), and rash (60.0%). Most AEs were grades 1-3. Overall, objective response rate (90% confidence interval [CI]) was 41.5% (31.2-52.5%). Median (range) duration of response was 11.09 (2.70-34.57) months. Median progression-free survival (90% CI) was 8.1 (5.4-23.3) months.

CONCLUSIONS

PF-06747775 had a manageable safety profile and the study design highlights important considerations for future anti-EGFR agent development.

Raising the level of cancer care: Feasibility and reported benefit of a virtual tumor board

e18595

Background: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (TBs) are a key component of high-quality oncology care. Access is variable, particularly outside the academic setting, and limited access likely disproportionately impacts underserved patient populations and may contribute to healthcare disparities. Virtual tumor boards (VTBs) may provide a solution. Methods: Objectives of this endeavor are to test the feasibility of conducting VTBs and assess their perceived benefit and educational value. Expert US faculty formed VTB panels via an online platform to discuss complex cases submitted by clinicians. Each panel included a moderator and a radiologist, as well as a medical, radiation and surgical oncologist. After the panel discussion, written recommendations and video recordings (de-identified) were shared with submitters. Recordings were available online to viewers with embedded questions to assess learning. Submitters were surveyed as to their perceived benefit of the discussion. Viewers were surveyed to assess the educational value. Results: From 07/2020-12/2021, 323 cases (97 breast, 109 thoracic, 49 gastrointestinal, 37 genitourinary, 31 hematologic) were submitted by 48 clinicians to 38 VTBs. Submitters were surveyed with a 73% response rate; 100% reported they were likely to submit a future case for discussion and that they believe the VTB will improve care for patients. Viewers (n = 39) were surveyed with a 72% response rate and included trainees and APPs working in medical, radiation, and surgical oncology as well as radiology. All viewers endorsed that the videos were a good educational resource, and that they would use them in the future. Both embedded questions were answered 74% of the time (315/425); answers post-viewing changed 43% of the time (137/315). Conclusions: VTBs are feasible and lead to a high degree of satisfaction among case submitters. In this cohort, users reported that their patient management changed based on the discussion. Of those who discussed the case at their own TB, most felt that the VTB expanded upon prior recommendations. A large proportion of users stated that their case was not discussed at an internal TB, suggesting the VTB may address an unmet need. Those who watched the videos found them to be a good resource and would use them in the future. Data from larger cohorts will be key in understanding the full impact of this endeavor, particularly in helping to address healthcare disparities.[Table: see text]

Phase (Ph) 1/2a study of CLN-081 in patients (pts) with NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (Ins20)

9007

Background: EGFR ins20-mutant NSCLC has historically been challenging to treat. While new agents targeting EGFR ins20 have recently been approved, adverse events (AEs), particularly wild type (WT) EGFR-related AEs are common. CLN-081 is a novel EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with broad activity against EGFR mutations, including ins20, and increased selectivity for ins20 versus WT EGFR. CLN-081 has been granted FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of pts with EGFR ins20 NSCLC. We present updated results of the initial multicenter Ph1/2a study of CLN-081 in pts with advanced, EGFR ins20-mutant NSCLC, including 39 pts treated in an expanded cohort at the dose of 100 mg twice daily (BID). Methods: Ph1 dose escalation utilized an accelerated titration (AT) and rolling six design. Individual cohorts were expanded in Phase 1 and 2a based on prespecified protocol criteria. Pts were required to have received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Stable, treated brain metastasis (mets) were allowed. CLN-081 is dosed in 21-day cycles. Results: As of 13 December 2021, 73 pts [median age: 65 (36-82), median lines of prior therapy: 2 (1-9), 28 (39%) with a history of brain mets] received CLN-081 at 30 mg (8), 45 mg (1), 65 mg (14), 100 mg (39), and 150 mg (11), all BID. Treatment-related AEs in ≥ 15% of pts were rash (74%), diarrhea (27%), paronychia (25%), fatigue (19%), anemia (18%), dry skin (18%), nausea (16%). Treatment-related Gr ≥ 3 AEs in ≥ 4 % of pts included anemia (10%), increased ALT (4%), and increased AST (4%). Gr 3 rash and Gr 3 diarrhea were observed in 1 and 2 pts, respectively, at 150 mg BID, while no pts treated at ≤ 100 mg BID experienced Gr 3 rash or diarrhea. Treatment-related dose reductions and discontinuations across all dose levels occurred in 10 pts (14%) and 5 pts (7%) respectively. Among 70 response-evaluable pts across all dose levels, 25 (36%) had a confirmed partial response (PR), 34 (49%) had stable disease (SD), and 3 (4%) had progressive disease as a best response. Seven pts (10%) had a PR that remained unconfirmed; 1 (1%) pt was pending a confirmatory scan. Of 36 response-evaluable pts at 100 mg BID, 14 (39%) had a confirmed PR, 17 (47%) had SD, and 1 (3%) had PD. Three pts had a PR that remained unconfirmed (8%); 1 (3%) pt was pending a confirmatory scan. Notably, among Ph1 pts treated at 100 mg BID (N = 13) in whom longer follow-up is available, the mDOR and mPFS (estimated by Kaplan-Meier) was > 15 months and 12 months, respectively. Disease control (SD ≥ 6 months or any PR) was observed in 12/13 pts (92%). Updated data with additional follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: In pts with heavily-pretreated advanced EGFR ins20 NSCLC, CLN-081 has a manageable safety profile, with anti-tumor activity across the range of doses tested. Further, CLN-081 has demonstrated a favorable clinical profile at the dose of 100 mg BID, with an encouraging objective response rate, response durability, and no Gr 3 rash or diarrhea. Clinical trial information: NCT04036682.

The impact of COVID-19 infection on immune-related adverse events in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

2525

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause a variety of inflammatory autoimmune tissue damage, referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). COVID-19 is associated with increased amounts of proinflammatory cytokines, which may synergistically affect the outcome of irAEs. Data are limited regarding the impact of COVID-19 on irAEs in ICI-treated cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with malignant solid tumors treated with ICIs at AdventHealth Orlando between August 2020 and August 2021. All COVID-19 infections were confirmed by PCR. Patients who had the most recent ICI treatment over one month before or after the positive COVID-19 test were excluded from the study. For COVID-19 positive group, only the irAEs that developed after COVID-19 infection were considered as events. Results: A total of 579 patients were included in our study, with 46 (7.9%) in COVID-19 positive group, and 533 (92.1%) in COVID-19 negative group. The baseline characteristics of patients in the two groups were similar in terms of age, ethnicity, ECOG, cancer histology, and type of ICI. With a median follow-up of 10 months (1-73 months), no differences in the time from ICI initiation to irAE onset, corticosteroid use, or additional immunosuppressant use were seen. A trend in higher incidence of all-grade diarrhea/colitis (8.7% vs. 3.0%, p=0.07) and grade 3 and 4 hepatitis (4.3% vs. 0.8%, p=0.08) was noted in the COVID-19 positive group, however the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference in the incidence of pneumonitis (2.2% vs. 1.1%, p=0.44), nephritis (2.2% vs. 0.8%, p=0.34) or dermatitis (6.5% vs. 6.4%, p=1.00) were noted between COVID-19 positive and negative groups. We noticed a higher incidence of all-grade irAEs in the COVID-19 positive group (30.4% vs. 19.9%, p=0.18), but the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 irAEs was significantly higher in the COVID-19 positive group (10.9% vs. 3.2%, p=0.02). Nine COVID-19 related death occurred while no irAE-related death was noted in the entire cohort. Conclusions: Our study suggested that COVID-19 may pose a risk of severe irAEs in cancer patients receiving ICIs. Close monitoring and possible delaying ICI administration could be considered when cancer patients were infected with COVID-19. [Table: see text]

Acquired EGFR-resistant mutations in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9113

Background: EGFR mutations are present in more than 10% of patients (pts) with NSCLC in the US. While EGFR with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective, acquired resistance is expected. Known mechanisms include acquired EGFR mutations (e.g. 718V, c797x, 724s, 721s or T790M); copy number amplifications in MET, ERBB2, and PIK3CA; gene fusion events; and histological transformation. We herein present the prevalence of resistance mutations in the largest reported cohort of EGFR mutant NSCLC. Methods: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor samples were submitted to Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) for NextGen Sequencing (NextSeq, 592 Genes) and whole exome sequencing (NovaSeq, WES). PD-L1 expression was tested by IHC using 22c3 (Dako) and TPS scores were reported (cutoff >1). TMB was measured by totaling somatic mutations (TMB-high cut-off > 10 mutations per MB), genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) was determined by WES. Patient treatment information was obtained from insurance claims data. Results: A total of 27,848 NSCLC tumors were evaluated and 3,223 (12%) had a EGFR sensitizing mutations. We found 60 tumors with common missense resistance mutations: 790 (n = 30, 0.9%), 797 (n = 38, 1.2 %), 718 (n = 11, 0.3%), 724 (n = 7, 0.2%) and 721 (n = 4, 0.1). Table 1 describes the frequencies, PD-L1 expression and the most common co-mutations. TMB-H (> = 10) was found in 12.5% of the tumors and dMMR/MSI-H in 1.8%. The most prevalent co-alterations were TP53 54%), gLOH (28%), CTNNB1 (19%), NFKB1A (13%), APC (10%), PIK3CA (11%), SMAD4 (9%) and other 15 co-mutations in less than 7% were seen. In the 30 T790M mutants, in addition to TP53 mutations, other prevalent co-mutations were PIK3CA (14%) and CTNNB1 (17%). In 797-mutant tumors, in addition to T790M, the most prevalent co-mutations were TP53 (53%), CTNNB1 (22%), APC (16%) and PIK3CA (11%). L718 mutations co-occurred with either L858R (8/11), exon 19 (3/11) or T790M mutations (3/11). G724 mutations were found in 7 patients (0.02%) and G721 mutations in 4 patients (0.01%). Conclusions: Acquired resistance in EGFR mutant NSCLC is very heterogeneous and their frequency is still low most likely due to lack of enough sequencing of EGFR resistant tumors. While T790M and C797S mutations are well described, this report also notes a significant number of L718V mutations, primarily in osimertinib-treated pts with an original L858R. These data support the NGS evaluation of patients with resistant EGFR mutant lung cancers. [Table: see text]

Poziotinib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring HER2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations After Prior Therapies: ZENITH20-2 Trial

PURPOSE

Insertion mutations in Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (ERBB2 or HER2) exon 20 occur in 2%-5% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and function as an oncogenic driver. Poziotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was evaluated in previously treated patients with NSCLC with HER2 exon 20 insertions.

METHODS

ZENITH20, a multicenter, multicohort, open-label phase II study, evaluated poziotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In cohort 2, patients received poziotinib (16 mg) once daily. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by independent review committee (RECIST v1.1); secondary outcome measures were disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety and tolerability. Quality of life was assessed.

RESULTS

Between October 2017 and March 2021, 90 patients with a median of two prior lines of therapy (range, 1-6) were treated. With a median follow-up of 9.0 months, objective response rate was 27.8% (95% CI, 18.9 to 38.2); 25 of 90 patients achieved a partial response. Disease control rate was 70.0% (95% CI, 59.4 to 79.2). Most patients (74%) had tumor reduction (median reduction 22%). Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9 to 5.8); median duration of response was 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.5). Clinical benefit was seen regardless of lines and types of prior therapy, presence of central nervous system metastasis, and types of HER2 mutations. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included rash (48.9%), diarrhea (25.6%), and stomatitis (24.4%). Most patients had poziotinib dose reductions (76.7%), with median relative dose intensity of 71.5%. Permanent treatment discontinuation because of treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13.3% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Poziotinib demonstrates antitumor activity in previously treated patients with HER2 exon 20 insertion NSCLC.

Clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 comutations: subgroup results from the phase III IMpower150 trial

Background

The efficacy of atezolizumab (A) and/or bevacizumab (B) with carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) chemotherapy was explored in the phase III, randomized IMpower150 study in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to KRAS mutations (mKRAS) and co-occurring STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 mutations.

Methods

Mutation status was determined by circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed in a mutation-evaluable intention-to-treat population (MEP; n=920) and SP263 (programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)) biomarker-evaluable population (n=774).

Results

Within the mKRAS population (24.5% of MEP), ABCP showed numerical improvements vs BCP in median OS (19.8 vs 9.9 months; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.72) and PFS (8.1 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.61)—greater than with ACP (OS: 11.7 vs 9.9 months; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91; PFS: 4.8 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.13) vs BCP. Across PD-L1 subgroups in mKRAS patients, OS and PFS were longer with ABCP vs BCP, but OS with ACP was similar to BCP in PD-L1-low and PD-L1-negative subgroups. Conversely, in KRAS-WT patients, OS was longer with ACP than with ABCP or BCP across PD-L1 subgroups. KRAS was frequently comutated with STK11, KEAP1, and TP53; these subgroups conferred different prognostic outcomes. Within the mKRAS population, STK11 and/or KEAP1 mutations were associated with inferior OS and PFS across treatments compared with STK11-WT and/or KEAP1-WT. In mKRAS patients with co-occurring mSTK11 and/or mKEAP1 (44.9%) or mTP53 (49.3%), survival was longer with ABCP than with ACP or BCP.

Conclusions

These analyses support previous findings of mutation of STK11 and/or KEAP1 as poor prognostic indicators. While clinical efficacy favored ABCP and ACP vs BCP in these mutational subgroups, survival benefits were greater in the mKRAS and KEAP1-WT and STK11-WT population vs mKRAS and mKEAP1 and mSTK11 population, suggesting both prognostic and predictive effects. Overall, these results suggest that atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab and chemotherapy is an efficacious first-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC subgroups with mKRAS and co-occurring STK11 and/or KEAP1 or TP53 mutations and/or high PD-L1 expression.

Characterization of KRAS Mutation Subtypes in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in NSCLC and development of direct KRAS inhibitors has renewed interest in this molecular variant. Different KRAS mutations may represent a unique biologic context with different prognostic and therapeutic impact. We sought to characterize genomic landscapes of advanced, KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a large national cohort to help guide future therapeutic development.Molecular profiles of 17,095 NSCLC specimens were obtained using DNA next-generation sequencing of 592 genes (Caris Life Sciences) and classified on the basis of presence and subtype of KRAS mutations. Co-occurring genomic alterations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and PD-L1 expression [22C3, tumor proportion score (TPS) score] were analyzed by KRAS mutation type.Across the cohort, 4,706 (27.5%) samples harbored a KRAS mutation. The most common subtype was G12C (40%), followed by G12V (19%) and G12D (15%). The prevalence of KRAS mutations was 37.2% among adenocarcinomas and 4.4% in squamous cell carcinomas. Rates of high TMB (≥10 mutations/Mb) and PD-L1 expression varied across KRAS mutation subtypes. KRAS G12C was the most likely to be PD-L1 positive (65.5% TPS ≥ 1%) and PD-L1 high (41.3% TPS ≥ 50%). STK11 was mutated in 8.6% of KRAS wild-type NSCLC but more frequent in KRAS-mutant NSCLC, with the highest rate in G13 (36.2%). TP53 mutations were more frequent in KRAS wild-type NSCLC (73.6%).KRAS mutation subtypes have different co-occurring mutations and a distinct genomic landscape. The clinical relevance of these differences in the context of specific therapeutic interventions warrants investigation.

Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose:

This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O with reference bevacizumab (BEV), as first-line treatment for patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Patients and methods:

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive MYL-1402O or bevacizumab with carboplatin-paclitaxel up to 18 weeks (6 cycles), followed by up to 24 weeks (8 cycles) of bevacizumab monotherapy. The primary objective was comparison of overall response rate (ORR), based on independently reviewed best tumor responses as assessed during the first 18 weeks. ORR was analyzed per US Food and Drug Administration (ratio of ORR) and European Medicines Agency (difference in ORRs) requirements for equivalence evaluation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival, safety, and immunogenicity over a period of 42 weeks, and pharmacokinetics (up to 18 weeks).

Results:

A total of 671 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. The ratio of ORR was 0.96 [confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR was −1.6 (CI −9.0, 5.9) between treatment arms; CIs were within the predefined equivalence margins. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events was comparable. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity was transient, with no notable differences between treatment arms (6.5% versus 4.8% ADA positivity rate in MYL-1402O versus BEV, respectively). The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower in the MYL-1402O arm (0.6%) compared to the bevacizumab arm (2.5%).

Conclusions:

MYL-1402O is therapeutically equivalent to bevacizumab, based on the ORR analyses, with comparable secondary endpoints.

Trial Registry Information

EU Clinical Trials Register, Registration # EudraCT no. 2015-005141-32https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2015-005141-32

Plain language summary

Previous studies established bioequivalence of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O to reference bevacizumab. In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, MYL-1402O (n = 337) demonstrated comparable efficacy to bevacizumab (n = 334) in treating advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer per Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency requirements for equivalence; the ratio of objective response rate (ORR) was 0.96 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR (MYL-1402O:bevacizumab) was −1.6 (95% CI −9.0, 5.9). Median progression-free survival at 42 weeks was comparable: 7.6 (7.0, 9.5) with MYL-1402O versus 9.0 (7.2, 9.7) months (p = 0.0906) with bevacizumab, by independent review. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death (2.4% vs 1.5%), serious adverse events (17.6% vs 16.7%), and antidrug antibodies (6.5% vs 4.8%), were comparable in the MYL-1402O vs bevacizumab arms, respectively. The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower with MYL-1402O (0.6%) than with bevacizumab (2.5%). These findings confirm therapeutic equivalence of MYL-1402O to bevacizumab, providing opportunities for improving access to bevacizumab.

IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain

INTRODUCTION

Final overall survival (OS) analyses are presented for EGFR mutations and liver or brain metastases subgroups in the phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) evaluating atezolizumab+bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ABCP) or atezolizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ACP) vs bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (BCP).

METHODS

Overall, 1202 patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to ABCP, ACP or BCP. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were permitted. OS was assessed in EGFR mutations and baseline liver metastases subgroups; rate and time to development (TTD) of new brain metastases was assessed in ITT patients.

RESULTS

At data cutoff (September 13, 2019; median follow-up, 39.3 months), OS improvements were sustained with ABCP versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% CI: 0.31-1.14; prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]: HR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.46) and baseline liver metastases (HR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45-1.02) subgroups. ACP did not show survival benefit versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: HR 1.0; 95% CI: 0.57-1.74; prior TKI: HR 1.22; 95% CI: 0.68-2.22) or liver metastases (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68-1.51) subgroups. Overall, 100 patients (8.3%) developed new brain metastases. While not formally evaluated, an improvement toward delayed TTD was seen with ABCP vs BCP (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

This final exploratory analysis showed OS benefits for ABCP versus BCP in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, including those with prior TKI failures, and with liver metastases, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The impact of ABCP on delaying the development of new brain lesions requires further investigation.

CNS activity of poziotinib in NSCLC with exon 20 insertion mutations

9093

Background: Treatment addressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations remains an unmet need. These tumors are associated with a high incidence of CNS metastases and unfavorable survival rates. Poziotinib is a potent, irreversible, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a structure that can overcome the steric hindrance of the exon 20 limited binding pocket. Preclinical data suggest poziotinib CNS penetration, and here we show meaningful poziotinib CNS activity in patients with NSCLC harboring exon 20 insertion mutations in an ongoing multi-cohort, multi-center Phase 2 study (ZENITH20; NCT03318939). Methods: ZENITH20 enrolled previously treated and naïve patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations in several cohorts: Cohort 1 (C1) EGFR previously treated; Cohort 2 (C2) HER2 previously treated and Cohort 3 (C3) EGFR treatment-naïve. All patients with stable CNS metastases at baseline were included. Poziotinib (16 mg) was administered orally QD, with follow-up for up to 24 months. The primary endpoint was Objective Response Rate (ORR) evaluated centrally using RECIST v1.1 by an independent image review committee. Secondary endpoints included Disease Control Rate (DCR), Duration of Response (DOR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and safety. Primary efficacy results have been previously released. Intracranial response was determined based on the modified RECIST criteria. Results: A total of 284 patients across 3 cohorts (C1 n=115; and C2 n=90; and C3 n=79) with a median age of 60.5 years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 7.3, 8.3, and 9.2 months for all patients in C1, C2, and C3, respectively. In NSCLC patients that had baseline CNS lesions (N=36), the analysis showed a patient-based ORR of 22.2% (8/36) and a DCR of 88.9% (32/36). One patient in each cohort had a complete intracranial response and stable disease was 80.6% across 3 cohorts and 92.9% in C2. Two patients each in C1 and C3 had progressive disease (PD) and none had CNS progression in C2 (Table). Conclusions: Poziotinib exhibited clinically meaningful CNS activity in patients with EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations in ZENITH20 Cohorts 1-3. The majority of the patients had no CNS progression and 3/36 patients had intracranial complete responses. The preliminary data suggest that poziotinib may provide a meaningful treatment alternative for patients with NSCLC that harbor EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations and who present with CNS metastases that have poor prognosis. Clinical trial information: NCT03318939. [Table: see text]

Safety and activity of CLN-081 (TAS6417) in NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutations (Ins20)

9077

Background: NSCLC with EGFR ins20 represents a significant area of unmet need, with no approved targeted therapies. While several agents targeting EGFR ins20 are in development, wild-type (WT) EGFR-related adverse events (AEs) have been common and challenging to manage. CLN-081 is a novel oral EGFR TKI with broad activity against clinically relevant EGFR mutations, including ins20, and has attenuated activity against WT EGFR relative to EGFR ins20 in vitro, suggesting that CLN-081 may have a more favorable clinical therapeutic window. We present interim results of a multicenter, Phase (Ph) 1/2a trial evaluating CLN-081 in advanced, EGFR ins20 NSCLC (NCT04036682). Methods: Patients (pts) with EGFR ins20 previously treated with platinum-based therapy (tx) were eligible to enroll. Ph 1 dose escalation in this adaptive trial began with an accelerated titration (AT) design, and converted to a rolling six design based upon pre-specified safety criteria or at clinically active doses. Cohort expansion in Ph 1 occurred at any dose where responses were seen. Transition from Ph 1 to 2a was based on a Simon-Two Stage design. Prior tx with EGFR ins20-specific inhibitors was allowed in AT cohorts only. CLN-081 was dosed twice daily (BID) in 21-day cycles. Results: As of 10 November 2020, 37 pts [median age 64 years (44-82); median 2 (1-9) prior lines of tx] received CLN-081 at doses of 30 mg (n = 8), 45 mg (1), 65 mg (12), 100 mg (13), and 150 mg (3) BID. The most common all-grade (gr) treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were rash (49%), diarrhea (24%), paronychia (16%), nausea (14%), stomatitis (14%), and dry skin (11%). Gr 3 TRAEs included anemia (5%), diarrhea (3%), and increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (3%). There was 1 DLT, gr 3 diarrhea at 150 mg BID. No gr ≥ 3 rash or gr 4/5 TRAEs were reported. Four pts (11%) required dose reductions for rash (2), diarrhea (1), and increased ALP (1). Two pts (5%) discontinued tx due to TRAEs of gr 2 hypersensitivity reaction (1) and gr 2 pneumonitis (1); the latter also experienced pneumonitis while receiving prior osimertinib. Among the 25 response evaluable pts (RECIST 1.1), 10 (40 %) had a partial response (PR) (6 confirmed, 2 pending confirmation, 2 unconfirmed), 14 (56%) had stable disease (SD), and 1 (4%) had progressive disease as best response. Of the 4 pts that received prior EGFR ins20 inhibitors, 2 had PR and 2 SD. Of pts with SD or PR as best response, 20/24 (83 %) experienced tumor regression [median regression: -18 % (-100 to +3)]. Enrollment is ongoing and updated data will be presented. Conclusions: CLN-081 has an acceptable safety profile, including diarrhea in < 25% of pts treated to date. CLN-081 has demonstrated encouraging preliminary anti-tumor activity across the full dose range tested, in multiple distinct EGFR ins20 variants, and in heavily pre-treated pts that are either naïve or refractory to other EGFR ins20 inhibitors. Since the time of the data cut, a Ph 2a expansion has been initiated at 100 mg BID. Clinical trial information: NCT04036682.

AdvanTIG-302: Anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb) ociperlimab (OCI) plus tislelizumab (TIS) versus pembrolizumab (PEM) in programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) selected, previously untreated, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

TPS9128

Background: Monotherapy with programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 antibodies has improved clinical outcomes for patients (pts) with non-oncogenic driven NSCLC but clinical responses are limited by primary and secondary resistance, and improvements in durability of response are required. T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domain (TIGIT) is a co-inhibitory, immune checkpoint receptor upregulated on T-cells and natural killer cells in multiple solid tumors, which can inhibit anticancer immune responses. OCI (BGB-A1217) is a novel, humanized mAb that binds to TIGIT with high affinity and specificity, which has demonstrated competent binding with C1q and all Fcγ receptors while inducing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that dual targeting with anti-TIGIT and anti-PD-1 antibodies produces synergistic immune cell activation and enhanced antitumor activity. Methods: AdvanTIG-302 is a Phase 3, multicenter, international, randomized, double-blind study (NCT04746924) investigating OCI in combination with TIS compared with PEM in adult pts (≥ 18 years of age) with PD-L1 selected, previously untreated, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic NSCLC without oncogenic EGFR or ALK mutation. Approximately 605 pts will be randomized 5:5:1 to receive: OCI 900 mg intravenously (IV) plus TIS 200 mg IV every three weeks (Q3W; Arm A), PEM 200 mg IV plus placebo IV Q3W (Arm B) or TIS 200 mg IV plus placebo IV Q3W (Arm C). Pts will be treated until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Stratification factors include histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and region (Asian vs non-Asian). Cross-over is not permitted. Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed disease, PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, no known EGFR or ALK mutations and no prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Dual primary endpoints are investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST v1.1) and overall survival (Arms A and B) in the Intention-to-Treat population. Secondary endpoints include PFS (assessed by Blinded Independent Review Committee), investigator-assessed overall response rate and duration of response, safety and tolerability, and patient-reported health-related quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13 and EQ-5D-5L; Arms A and B). Exploratory endpoints include disease control rate, clinical benefit rate and time to response. This study will also evaluate the association between biomarkers and response or resistance. Study enrollment has begun and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04746924.

Population pharmacokinetics (Pop PK) of MYL-1402O (a proposed biosimilar to bevacizumab) and reference product (Avastin) in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC)

e21087

Background: MYL-1402O (MYL) is a proposed biosimilar to bevacizumab reference product. A multicenter, double blind randomized, phase 3 study compared the efficacy, safety, PK, and immunogenicity of MYL and Avastin in patients with Stage IV metastatic nsNSCLC. Patients received either MYL or reference product, in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel up to 18 weeks (6 cycles) followed by monotherapy for up to an additional 24 weeks (8 cycles). The objective was to develop a Pop PK model based on data from a phase 3 study pooled with a single dose healthy volunteer phase 1 study data; to assess PK linearity across the dose levels of 1 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg in 2 clinical studies; to assess the PK similarity of MYL and reference product in patients with nsNSCLC; and to explore potential covariates to account for variability in Pop PK model parameters. Methods: A Pop PK model was developed based on preliminary analyses of MYL phase 1 data and published population analyses of reference product using a 2-compartment linear model (Han K et al., 2016). Individual empiric Bayesian parameter estimates of nsNSCLC patients were used to predict PK measures reflecting exposure to drug and were compared qualitatively between treatments. Results: The data subset used for model development consisted of 8724 records from 771 subjects. Population PK analyses indicated no differences between PK profiles of patients in the MYL and reference product arms. Importantly, treatment was not a significant covariate of clearance ( P = 0.453) or volume of the central compartment ( P = 0.161) using the likelihood ratio χ2 test. Model-based steady state exposure measures, predicted based on the final model for all patients, were also similar between treatment arms (Table). Conclusions: The model supported linear PK at clinical doses in patients with nsNSCLC; there were no clinically relevant/significant differences between the PK of MYL and reference product; and the findings were consistent with the PK study in normal, healthy volunteers. Bayesian Parameter Clinical trial information: 2015-005141-32. [Table: see text]

Atezolizumab in first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the real-world setting

e21112

Background: The phase III IMpower150 study showed efficacy benefits with atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, carboplatin and paclitaxel (ABCP; arm B) as first-line (1L) treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic non-squamous (nsq) NSCLC. The FDA approved this regimen for these pts (with no EGFR or ALK mutations [WT]) on December 2018. However, to date there is limited evidence on its use in real life. This study aimed to explore the use of ABCP in the real-world setting and to describe the characteristics of early adopters (those who received ABCP in 1L). Methods: Data were extracted from the Flatiron Health database (US population). Pts with advanced stage IIIB/IV nsq NSCLC at diagnosis receiving ABCP regimen in any line were eligible for the study. Finally, early adopters were selected. Results: A total of 67 pts received the ABCP regimen in 1L. Baseline characteristics for these pts and comparisons with the IMpower150 population are summarized in Table. Real-world (rw) response in the WT group ( n = 49; 6 pts were excluded due to EGFR mutations and 12 because minimum follow-up was not reached) was similar to that of the IMpower150 series (rwRR: 55.1% [40.2-69.3] vs. 63.5% [58.2-68.5]), despite the WT population being older with a higher proportion of ECOG PS = 1. In patients who would have met the IMpower150 inclusion criteria ( n = 24), rwRR was 70.8% (48.9-87.4). Conclusions: The ABCP regimen has been adopted in the real-world setting. In terms of efficacy, response rates and current PFS data were in line with trial results, despite the population being unselected and having a worse clinical profile. Longer follow-up is required for rwOS data. vs. arm B IMpower150 results.[Table: see text]

Pooled analyses of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and efficacy from the phase 3 trials IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150

9002

Background: PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors have transformed the treatment (tx) of advanced NSCLC. Evidence suggests that the occurrence of irAEs with these agents may predict improved outcomes in cancers such as NSCLC. Atezolizumab (atezo; anti–PD-L1) has shown efficacy and tolerability in NSCLC and is currently approved in the 1L and 2L+ settings. The Ph 3 IMpower130, IMpower132 and IMpower150 trials evaluated atezo + chemo ± bevacizumab (bev) as 1L tx of NSCLC. We explore the association between irAEs and efficacy in these trials. Methods: Each trial enrolled tx-naive patients (pts) with nonsquamous stage IV NSCLC. Pts were randomized to: carboplatin (carbo) + nab-paclitaxel alone or with atezo in IMpower130; carbo or cisplatin alone or with atezo in IMpower132; atezo (A) + bev (B) + carbo + paclitaxel (CP), ACP or BCP in IMpower150. Data were pooled (data cutoffs: Mar 15 2018 [IMpower130]; May 22 2018 [IMpower132]; Sep 13 2019 [IMpower150]) and analyzed by tx (atezo-containing vs control) and irAE status. A time-dependent Cox model and landmark analyses at 1, 3, 6 and 12 mo were used to control for immortal bias. Study protocols required atezo tx interruption/discontinuation for grade (Gr) ≥3 irAEs. Results: 2503 pts were included in the analysis (atezo, n = 1577; control, n = 926). In both arms, baseline characteristics were generally balanced between pts with irAEs (atezo, n = 753; control, n = 289) and without irAEs (atezo, n = 824; control, n = 637). Any-Gr irAEs occurred in 48% (atezo) and 32% (control) of pts; Gr 3-5 irAEs occurred in 11% (atezo) and 5% (control). The most common irAEs (atezo vs control) were rash (28% vs 18%), hepatitis (lab abnormalities; 15% vs 10%) and hypothyroidism (12% vs 4%). Median time to onset of first irAE was 1.7 (atezo) vs 1.4 mo (control). OS HRs (95% CI) from the time-dependent Cox model between pts with vs without irAEs were 0.69 (0.60, 0.78) in the atezo arm and 0.82 (0.68, 0.99) in the control arm; after excluding rash (perceived as the least specific irAE), OS HRs (95% CI) were 0.75 (0.65, 0.87) and 0.90 (0.71, 1.12), respectively. OS landmark data are in the Table. Conclusions: In this exploratory pooled analysis, pts with irAEs had longer OS vs pts without irAEs in the atezo-containing and control arms per the time-dependent Cox model and landmark analyses; this trend remained for the atezo arm after excluding rash. Landmark analyses suggest that in the atezo arm, pts with Gr 1/2 irAEs had the longest OS and pts with Gr ≥3 irAEs had the shortest OS, potentially due to tx interruption/discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02367781; NCT02657434; NCT02366143. [Table: see text]

Interprofessional care team practices and perspectives on immuno-oncology (IO) therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC): Insights from a nationwide survey

e21147

Background: Appropriate molecular testing, biomarker-directed treatment selection, and management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are essential best practices for managing patients with mNSCLC who are eligible for IO therapies. Identifying real-world challenges among mNSCLC care teams is necessary to inform educational interventions that support optimal care. Methods: From 10/2020 to 01/2021, 75 health care professionals (HCPs) who treat mNSCLC completed surveys assessing practice patterns, challenges, and confidence related to the use of IO therapies. To reflect current real-world practice across treatment settings, surveys were administered at 10 clinics nationwide and through a large oncology practice network. Results: Participants represented the interprofessional mNSCLC care team: oncologists (50%), primary care physicians (23%), advanced practice professionals (13%), and nurses (13%). Nearly one-third reported that PD-L1+ mNSCLC presented greater management challenges than other mNSCLC sub-types. Regarding patients who are eligible for IO therapies, the most commonly reported challenges were applying pathology results to treatment decisions (29%), differentiating IO therapies (19%), and managing irAEs (19%). Case-based questions revealed gaps in care relative to guidelines: 65% incorrectly identified which patients should be tested for PD-L1; 49% failed to identify the most appropriate IO regimen based on case details; and 65% failed to identify an inappropriate strategy for managing mild irAEs (Table). Further, HCPs reported inappropriate reasons to exclude patients from IO therapy and suboptimal use of supportive care measures. Confidence gaps echoed these challenges; most HCPs reported less-than-high confidence in their ability to apply molecular test results to treatment decisions (80%), differentiate IO therapies based on PD-L1 expression (65%), or coordinate irAE care (85%). Conclusions: In current real-world practice, mNSCLC care teams report challenges in biomarker testing and interpretation; differentiation of IO therapies based on patient, disease, and treatment factors; and irAE management. These identified gaps represent key opportunities for future interventions to improve mNSCLC care. [Table: see text]

A pharmacokinetics study of proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O vs EU-bevacizumab and US-bevacizumab

PURPOSE

Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-specific angiogenesis in some cancers. MYL-1402O is a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar.

METHODS

The primary objective of this single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, phase 1 study in healthy male volunteers was to evaluate bioequivalence of MYL-1402O to EU and US-reference bevacizumab, and EU-reference bevacizumab to US-reference bevacizumab. The primary pharmacokinetic parameter was area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC_0-∞). Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using general linear models of analysis of variance. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Of 111 enrolled subjects, 110 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis (MYL-1402O, n = 37; EU-reference bevacizumab, n = 36; US-reference bevacizumab, n = 37). Bioequivalence was demonstrated between MYL-1402O and EU-reference bevacizumab, MYL-1402O and US-reference bevacizumab, and between EU- and US-reference bevacizumab where least squares mean ratios of AUC_0-∞ were close to 1, and 90% CIs were within the equivalence range (0.80-1.25). Secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC from 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration [AUC_0-t], peak serum concentration [C_max], time to C_max, elimination rate constant, and elimination half-life) were also comparable, with 90% CIs for ratios of AUC_0-t and C_max within 80-125%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all three treatment groups and were consistent with clinical data for bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

MYL-1402O was well tolerated and demonstrated pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to EU-reference bevacizumab and US-reference bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers. No new significant safety issues emerged (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02469987; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT, 2014-005621-12; June 12, 2015).

Crizotinib in Patients With MET-Amplified NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

MET amplification is a rare, potentially actionable, primary oncogenic driver in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

The influence of MET amplification on the clinical activity of the ALK, ROS1, and MET inhibitor, crizotinib (250 mg twice daily), was examined in patients with NSCLC (NCT00585195) who were enrolled into high (≥4 MET-to-CEP7 ratio), medium (>2.2 to <4 MET-to-CEP7 ratio), or low (≥1.8 to ≤2.2 MET-to-CEP7 ratio) amplification categories. Retrospective next-generation sequencing profiling was performed on archival tumor tissue. End points included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients with a MET-to-CEP7 ratio greater than or equal to 1.8 by local fluorescence in situ hybridization testing received crizotinib. All patients were response-assessable, among whom 21, 14, and 3 had high, medium, and low MET amplification, respectively. ORRs of 8 of 21 (38.1%), 2 of 14 (14.3%), and 1 of 3 (33.3%), median duration of response of 5.2, 3.8, and 12.2 months, and median progression-free survival values of 6.7, 1.9, and 1.8 months were observed for those with high, medium, and low MET amplification, respectively. MET amplification gene copy number greater than or equal to 6 was detected by next-generation sequencing in 15 of 19 (78.9%) analyzable patients. Of these 15 patients, objective responses were observed in six (40%), two of whom had concurrent MET exon 14 alterations. No responses were observed among five patients with concurrent KRAS, BRAF, or EGFR mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high-level, MET-amplified NSCLC responded to crizotinib with the highest ORR. Use of combined diagnostics for MET and other oncogenes may potentially identify patients most likely to respond to crizotinib.

CRESTONE: Clinical study of response to seribantumab in tumors with neuregulin-1 (NRG1) fusions—A phase II study of the anti-HER3 mAb for advanced or metastatic solid tumors (NCT04383210)

TPS449

Background: NRG1 (Neuregulin-1) gene fusions are rare oncogenic drivers found in 0.2% of solid tumors, including lung, pancreatic, gallbladder, breast, ovarian, colorectal, neuroendocrine, and sarcomas. NRG1 is the predominant ligand of HER3 and to a lesser extent HER4. NRG1 fusion proteins retaining an active EGF-like domain drive tumorigenesis and proliferation through aberrant HER3 activation. Importantly, NRG1 fusions are often mutually exclusive with other known driver alterations. NRG1 fusions have been correlated with worse overall and disease-free survival and poor response to treatment with standard therapies including chemotherapy, PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibitors and combinations of these agents. Inhibition of HER3 and its dimerization partners represents a rational and novel therapeutic approach for tumors harboring an NRG1 fusion supported by case studies of clinical responses to anti-HER3 antibodies or pan-ERBB (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) TKIs like afatinib. Seribantumab is a fully human IgG2 mAb against HER3 uniquely able to inhibit NRG1-dependent activation of HER3, HER3-HER2 dimerization, and downstream signaling through the PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways. The clinical safety profile of seribantumab has been well characterized through prior monotherapy and combination studies in over 800 patients. Methods: CRESTONE is an open label, multicenter phase 2 basket trial of seribantumab in adult patients with NRG1 fusion-positive locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors who have progressed on or are nonresponsive to available therapies. The trial will enroll at least 75 previously treated patients across three cohorts. Cohort 1 (N=55) will include patients who have not received prior treatment with any ERBB targeted therapy. Cohort 2 (up to N=10) will include patients who have progressed after prior treatment which includes ERBB targeted therapy. Cohort 3 (up to N=10) will include patients harboring NRG1 fusions without an EGF-like binding domain. NRG1 fusion status for enrollment will be determined through a local CLIA or similarly accredited molecular assay. NRG1 fusion status for patients in Cohort 1 will be centrally confirmed using an RNA-based NGS assay. This study will evaluate a novel dosing regimen of weekly induction, biweekly consolidation, and Q3W maintenance designed to rapidly achieve steady state levels, optimize exposure, and deliver maximal NRG1 inhibition. The primary endpoint is ORR per RECIST v1.1 by independent radiologic review. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DoR), safety, PFS, OS, and overall clinical benefit rate. An interim analysis is planned following enrollment of 20 patients in Cohort 1. CRESTONE is open and accruing patients in the United States. Clinical trial information: NCT04383210.

Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Nonsquamous NSCLC: Results From the Randomized Phase 3 IMpower132 Trial

INTRODUCTION

We report the final results of the phase 3 IMpower132 study evaluating atezolizumab plus carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed (APP) in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK genetic alterations were randomized in a one-to-one ratio to receive four or six cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed (PP) or APP every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed alone. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat population included 578 patients (APP, n = 292; PP, n = 286). At the primary PFS analysis (May 22, 2018; median follow-up, 14.8 mo), APP exhibited significant PFS improvement versus PP (median = 7.6 versus 5.2 mo, stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.72, p < 0.0001). OS for the APP group was numerically better but not statistically significant at the interim (May 22, 2018; median = 18.1 versus 13.6 mo, stratified HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.64-1.03, p = 0.0797) and final analyses (July 18, 2019; median = 17.5 versus 13.6 mo; stratified HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71-1.06, p = 0.1546). The OS and PFS results favored APP versus PP across subgroups. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 54.6% (APP) and 40.1% (PP) of patients; grade 5 treatment-related events occurred in 3.8% and 2.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IMpower132 met its co-primary PFS end point but not its co-primary OS end point, with numerical improvement for OS in the APP arm. APP had a manageable safety profile, with no new or unexpected safety signals identified.

Abstract PO-003: CRESTONE – Clinical study of response to seribantumab in tumors with neuregulin-1 (NRG1) Fusions – A phase 2 study of the anti-HER3 mAb for advanced or metastatic solid tumors (NCT04383210)

Background: NRG1 (Neuregulin-1) gene fusions are rare oncogenic drivers found in 0.2% of solid tumors, including lung, pancreatic, gallbladder, breast, ovarian, colorectal, neuroendocrine, and sarcomas. NRG1 is the predominant ligand of HER3 and to a lesser extent HER4. NRG1 fusion proteins retaining an active EGF-like domain drive tumorigenesis and proliferation through aberrant HER3 activation. Importantly, NRG1 fusions are often mutually exclusive with other known driver alterations. NRG1 fusions have been correlated with worse overall and disease-free survival and poor response to treatment with standard therapies including chemotherapy, PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibitors and combinations of these agents. Inhibition of HER3 and its dimerization partners represents a rational and novel therapeutic approach for tumors harboring an NRG1 fusion supported by case studies of clinical responses to anti-HER3 antibodies or pan-ERBB (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) TKIs like afatinib. Seribantumab is a fully human IgG2 mAb against HER3 uniquely able to inhibit NRG1-dependent activation of HER3, HER3-HER2 dimerization, and downstream signaling through the PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways. The clinical safety profile of seribantumab has been well characterized through prior monotherapy and combination studies in over 800 patients. Methods: CRESTONE is an open label, multicenter Phase 2 basket trial of seribantumab in adult patients with NRG1 fusion-positive locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors who have progressed on or are nonresponsive to available therapies. The trial will enroll at least 75 previously treated patients across three cohorts. Cohort 1 (N=55) will include patients who have not received prior treatment with any ERBB targeted therapy. Cohort 2 (up to N=10) will include patients who have progressed after prior treatment which includes ERBB targeted therapy. Cohort 3 (up to N=10) will include patients harboring NRG1 fusions without an EGF-like binding domain. NRG1 fusion status for enrollment will be determined through a local CLIA or similarly accredited molecular assay. NRG1 fusion status for patients in Cohort 1 will be centrally confirmed using an RNA-based NGS assay. This study will evaluate a novel dosing regimen of weekly induction, biweekly consolidation, and Q3W maintenance designed to rapidly achieve steady state levels, optimize exposure, and deliver maximal NRG1 inhibition. The primary endpoint is ORR per RECIST v1.1 by independent radiologic review. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DoR), safety, PFS, OS, and overall clinical benefit rate. An interim analysis is planned following enrollment of 20 patients in Cohort 1. CRESTONE is open and accruing patients in the United States. Clinical trial information: NCT04383210.

Citation Format: Johanna C. Bendell, Kian-Huat Lim, Mark E. Burkard, Jessica J. Lin, Young Kwang Chae, Mark A. Socinski, Gazala Khan, Karen L. Reckamp, Shawn Leland, Douglas Plessinger, Lori Kunkel, Efrat Dotan, Gregory Otterson, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Tejas Patil, John V. Heymach, Edward S. Kim. CRESTONE – Clinical study of response to seribantumab in tumors with neuregulin-1 (NRG1) Fusions – A phase 2 study of the anti-HER3 mAb for advanced or metastatic solid tumors (NCT04383210) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2020 Sep 29-30. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(22 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-003.

Defining high-quality NSCLC care at U.S. cancer centers

229

Background: While clinical guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations on individual components of care and advocate multidisciplinary collaboration, guidance spanning the complete patient journey is lacking. We aimed to compile quality-focused recommendations for the multidisciplinary team and selected clinical criteria for ideal NSCLC care, and propose a new set of metrics encompassing the entire care continuum. These metrics would be used as a new benchmark for ideal NSCLC care via the Association of Community Cancer Centers’ (ACCC) national quality care initiative for patients with advanced (stage III/IV) NSCLC. Methods: The ACCC convened an expert steering committee of multidisciplinary specialists and representation from patient advocacy to compile evidence-based recommendations via a systematic search of clinical and quality care guidelines and peer-reviewed journals. Quality recommendations were organized within key care areas of the patient journey: care coordination and patient education, diagnosis and biomarker testing, staging and treatment planning, and survivorship. Results: A total of 32 recommendations were included across the 4 key NSCLC care areas. Key quality recommendations are listed (Table). Conclusions: The full set of recommendations define ideal NSCLC care and serve as a valuable guide for multidisciplinary practice and quality improvement initiatives. [Table: see text]

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Progression-Free Survival Associated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapies for ALK+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Little is known about real-world treatment and outcomes of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study of the Flatiron Health EHR-derived deidentified database included patients with a lung cancer diagnosis and confirmed advanced NSCLC who received ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2018). Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were characterized. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and time to discontinuation were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

First-line ALK TKI therapy was administered to 581 patients (27.5% had brain metastasis on or prior to initiation) and second-line ALK TKI therapy to 254 patients post crizotinib (45.7% had brain metastasis on or prior to second-line ALK TKI initiation). Crizotinib (84.6%; n = 492) was the most commonly administered first-line ALK TKI therapy. For second-line ALK TKI post crizotinib (n = 254), 49.6% received ceritinib, 41.7% received alectinib, 5.9% received crizotinib retreatment, and 2.8% received brigatinib. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS was 7.47 (6.48-8.32) months for first-line and 7.30 (5.72-8.42) months for second-line ALK TKI. Median (95% CI) rwPFS was significantly longer among first-line ALK TKI patients without than with brain metastasis (8.52 [7.57-10.59] vs. 4.97 [3.75-5.99] months; p < .0001) and patients with brain metastasis on or prior to first-line ALK TKI therapy had a significantly increased risk of progression (hazard ratio ± SE, 1.976 ± 0.112; p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Median rwPFS in patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC was < 8 months for first- and second-line ALK TKI therapy and was even shorter in patients with brain metastasis, highlighting the need for more effective treatments in this patient population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Results presented herein describe real-world treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC with ALK TKI therapies from January 2011 through June 2018. Crizotinib was the most commonly prescribed first-line ALK TKI therapy in this patient population, but the majority of data analyzed were obtained prior to Food and Drug Administration approval of alectinib and ceritinib in the first-line ALK TKI setting. Physicians should monitor patients closely to help identify when a change in treatment should occur.

Prognostic Value of KRAS Mutation Subtypes and PD-L1 Expression in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of different KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene) mutation subtypes and their association with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) remain unclear. We examined the association of KRAS mutation subtypes with clinical outcomes and PD-L1 expression status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with KRAS-mutated LADC were evaluated for PD-L1 expression, cancer staging, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

A cohort of 254 KRAS-mutated LADC patients (median follow-up, 17 months) was studied. The 3 major subtypes of KRAS mutations were G12C (46.1%), G12V (21.7%), and G12D (15.7%). We found that all these subtypes had no impact on cancer stages, brain metastasis at diagnosis, OS, and relapse-free survival. Among this cohort, 33% of 94 patients who had PD-L1 staining data available had PD-L1-positive disease (≥ 1% of tumor cells). PD-L1 expression status was not significantly different among the 3 major mutation subtypes. Of interest, among patients with G12C mutation, positive PD-L1 expression was associated with significantly shorter OS (median survival, 5.7 vs. 12.8 months, P = .007). In multivariable analysis, PD-L1 positivity remained as an adverse factor for OS, with hazard ratio of 4.44 (P = .0007). PD-L1 status did not affect OS in other subtypes of mutations.

CONCLUSION

KRAS mutation subtype is not associated with patient clinical outcomes or PD-L1 expression status. However, PD-L1 positivity appears to negatively affect OS in LADC patients with G12C mutation. Further study is needed to confirm our observation and to determine if programmed cell death 1/PD-L1 antagonist may affect the clinical outcome of patients with different KRAS mutation subtypes.