Seven-Year Follow-Up of the Phase III KEYNOTE-006 Study: Pembrolizumab Versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Immune checkpoint inhibitors have led to unprecedented prolongation of overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced melanoma. Five-year follow-up of KEYNOTE-006 showed pembrolizumab prolonged survival versus ipilimumab. Efficacy results with 7-year follow-up are presented. At data cutoff (April 19, 2021), median follow-up was 85.3 months (range, 0.03-90.8 months). Median OS was 32.7 months for pembrolizumab versus 15.9 months for ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.83); 7-year OS was 37.8% and 25.3%, respectively. OS HRs favored pembrolizumab regardless of BRAF status or prior BRAF/MEK-inhibitor treatment and prognostic characteristics (elevated lactate dehydrogenase, large tumor size, and brain metastasis). Median modified progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.4 months for pembrolizumab versus 3.8 months for ipilimumab; 7-year mPFS was 23.8% and 13.3%, respectively. In patients who completed ≥94 weeks of pembrolizumab, the 5-year OS was 92.9% and the 5-year mPFS was 70.1%. The objective response rate with second-course pembrolizumab (n = 16) was 56% (95% CI, 30 to 80) and the 2-year mPFS was 62.5%. These findings confirm that pembrolizumab provides long-term survival benefit in advanced melanoma.

Nivolumab and Relatlimab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma That Had Progressed on Anti-Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death Ligand 1 Therapy: Results From the Phase I/IIa RELATIVITY-020 Trial

PURPOSE

Nivolumab and relatlimab activity in advanced melanoma with prior progression on anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-(L)1)-containing regimens is under investigation. RELATIVITY-047 demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) for nivolumab and relatlimab over nivolumab in previously untreated advanced melanoma.

METHODS

The phase I/IIa, open-label RELATIVITY-020 trial part D assessed efficacy and safety of nivolumab and relatlimab in advanced melanoma with progression during, or within 3 months of, 1 (D1) or ≥ 1 (D2) anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimens. Safety was a primary end point. Objective response rate (coprimary end point) and PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) were assessed.

RESULTS

Five hundred eighteen patients (D1 = 354; D2 = 164) received nivolumab and relatlimab. Among evaluable patients, the objective response rate by BICR was 12.0% (95% CI, 8.8 to 15.8) in D1 (n = 351) and 9.2% (95% CI, 5.2 to 14.7) in D2 (n = 163). Responses appeared to be enriched among patients with tumors expressing programmed death ligand 1 or lymphocyte activation gene 3; however, responses were observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 and lymphocyte activation gene 3 expression (1%). The median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, 12.9 to not reached) in D1 and 12.8 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.9) in D2. The median PFS by BICR was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.5) in D1 and 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.6) in D2; the 6-month PFS rate was 29.1% (95% CI, 24.2 to 34.1) and 27.7% (95% CI, 20.5 to 35.4), respectively. The grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event incidence was 15.0% in D1 and 12.8% in D2. One case of grade 3 myocarditis and no treatment-related deaths occurred across part D.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab and relatlimab had a manageable safety profile and demonstrated durable clinical activity in a proportion of patients with heavily pretreated advanced melanoma with prior progression on anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimens.

[Media: see text].

A phase I trial of LXS196, a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, for metastatic uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastases (MUM) with a poor prognosis and median overall survival of approximately 1 year.

METHODS

This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of the oral protein kinase C inhibitor LXS196 in 68 patients with MUM (NCT02601378). Patients received LXS196 doses ranging from 100-1000 mg once daily (QD; n = 38) and 200-400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 30).

RESULTS

First cycle dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 7/38 (18.4%) QD and 2/17 (11.8%) BID patients. Hypotension was the most common DLT, occurring at doses ≥500 mg/day, and manageable with LXS196 interruption and dose reduction. Median duration of exposure to LXS196 was 3.71 months (range: 1.81-15.28) for QD and 4.6 months (range: 0.33-58.32) for BID dosing. Clinical activity was observed in 6/66 (9.1%) evaluable patients achieving response (CR/PR), with a median duration of response of 10.15 months (range: 2.99-41.95); 45/66 had stable disease (SD) per RECIST v1.1. At 300 mg BID, the recommended dose for expansion, 2/18 (11.1%) evaluable patients achieved PR and 12/18 (66.7%) had SD.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest manageable toxicity and encouraging clinical activity of single-agent LXS196 in patients with MUM.

Long-term outcomes of stage IIB-IV melanoma patients: nationwide data from Norway

Aim: This study was performed to investigate the characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients with completely resected stage IIB-IV cutaneous melanoma identified in the Cancer Registry of Norway. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients with stage ≥IIB cutaneous melanoma was performed in Norway (January 2008 to December 2018), excluding patients with stage IV melanoma without evidence of surgery. Results: 5-year OS varied by stage (IIB 65%, IIC 38%, IIIA 79%, IIIB 66%, IIIC 52%, IIID 37% and IV 39%). Adjusted Cox models showed that stage IIIA and IIIB patients showed similar survival to stage IIB patients (hazard ratio [95% CI]: IIIA 0.67 [0.44-1.04]; IIIB 1.18 [0.96-1.45]), while all other stages had lower survival than IIB. Conclusion: Survival for stage II patients, particularly IIC, can be poor and in some cases worse than patients with more advanced stage melanoma. Our data highlight an unmet need for effective adjuvant treatment options among stage IIB/C patients.

Single-cell characterization of anti-LAG-3 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment in patients with melanoma

BackgroundRelatlimab plus nivolumab (anti-lymphocyte-activation gene 3 plus anti-programmed death 1 [anti-LAG-3+anti-PD-1]) has been approved by the FDA as a first-line therapy for stage III/IV melanoma, but its detailed effect on the immune system is unknown.MethodsWe evaluated blood samples from 40 immunotherapy-naive or prior immunotherapy-refractory patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-LAG-3+anti-PD-1 in a phase I trial using single-cell RNA and T cell receptor sequencing (scRNA+TCRαβ-Seq) combined with other multiomics profiling.ResultsThe highest LAG3 expression was noted in NK cells, Tregs, and CD8+ T cells, and these cell populations underwent the most significant changes during the treatment. Adaptive NK cells were enriched in responders and underwent profound transcriptomic changes during the therapy, resulting in an active phenotype. LAG3+ Tregs expanded, but based on the transcriptome profile, became metabolically silent during the treatment. Last, higher baseline TCR clonality was observed in responding patients, and their expanding CD8+ T cell clones gained a more cytotoxic and NK-like phenotype.ConclusionAnti-LAG-3+anti-PD-1 therapy has profound effects on NK cells and Tregs in addition to CD8+ T cells.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01968109)FundingCancer Foundation Finland, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, Relander Foundation, State funding for university-level health research in Finland, a Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences Fellow grant, Academy of Finland (grant numbers 314442, 311081, 335432, and 335436), and an investigator-initiated research grant from BMS.

Pilot Study of ONCOS-102 and Pembrolizumab: Remodeling of the Tumor Microenvironment and Clinical Outcomes in Anti-PD-1-Resistant Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Intratumoral oncolytic virotherapy may overcome anti-PD(L)-1 resistance by triggering pro-inflammatory remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. This pilot study investigated ONCOS-102 (oncolytic adenovirus expressing GM-CSF) plus anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD)-1 therapy in anti-PD-1-resistant melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma progressing after prior PD-1 blockade received intratumoral ONCOS-102 either as priming with 3 doses (3 × 1011 viral particles) during Week 1 [Part 1 (sequential treatment)] or as 4-dose priming and 8 booster doses every 3 weeks [Part 2 (combination treatment)]. From Week 3, all patients received pembrolizumab every 3 weeks (≤8 doses). The primary endpoint was safety. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and immunologic activation in repeat biopsies were also investigated.

RESULTS

In 21 patients (Part 1, n = 9; Part 2, n = 12) ONCOS-102 plus pembrolizumab was well tolerated: most adverse events (AE) were mild/moderate in severity. Pyrexia (43%), chills (43%), and nausea (28%) were the most common ONCOS-102-related AEs. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. ORR was 35% [response evaluation in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1, irRECIST]. Reduction in size of ≥1 non-injected lesions observed in 53% patients indicated a systemic effect. In injected tumors, persistent immune-related gene expression and T-cell infiltration were associated with clinical benefit. Viral persistence and efficacy in injected and non-injected lesions without additional toxicity supported Part 2 dosing regimen in future studies.

CONCLUSIONS

ONCOS-102 plus pembrolizumab was well tolerated and led to objective responses in patients with anti-PD-1-resistant advanced melanoma. ONCOS-102 promoted T-cell infiltration, particularly cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, which persisted at Week 9, driving clinical benefit. Further investigation of ONCOS-102 plus PD-1 blockade is warranted. See related commentary by Levi and Boland, p. 3.

Ipilimumab in a real-world population: A prospective Phase IV trial with long-term follow-up

Ipilimumab was the first treatment that improved survival in advanced melanoma. Efficacy and toxicity in a real-world setting may differ from clinical trials, due to more liberal eligibility criteria and less intensive monitoring. Moreover, high costs and lack of biomarkers have raised cost-benefit concerns about ipilimumab in national healthcare systems and limited its use. Here, we report the prospective, interventional study, Ipi4 (NCT02068196), which aimed to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of ipilimumab in a real-world population with advanced melanoma. This national, multicentre, phase IV trial included 151 patients. Patients received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenously and were followed for at least 5 years or until death. Treatment interruption or cessation occurred in 38%, most frequently due to disease progression (19%). Treatment-associated grade 3 to 4 toxicity was observed in 28% of patients, and immune-related toxicity in 56%. The overall response rate was 9%. Median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI: 8.3-15.9); and progression-free survival 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.6-2.8). After 5 years, 20% of patients were alive. In a landmark analysis from 6 months, improved survival was associated with objective response (HR 0.16, P = .001) and stable disease (HR 0.49, P = .005) compared to progressive disease. Poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein were identified as biomarkers. This prospective trial represents the longest reported follow-up of a real-world melanoma population treated with ipilimumab. Results indicate safety and efficacy comparable to phase III trials and suggest that the use of ipilimumab can be based on current cost-benefit estimates.

Abstract CT231: Nivolumab and ipilimumab +/- UV1 vaccine as 1st line treatment in patients with malignant melanoma (INITIUM-trial)

Nivolumab and ipilimumab +/- UV1 vaccine as 1st line treatment in patients with malignant melanoma (INITIUM-trial)Malignant melanomas (MM) are tumors originating from the melanocytes in the skin or mucosal surfaces. Even if the prognosis has improved considerably with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, half of the patients with metastatic MM dies within 5 years. Patients indicated for CPI as first line treatment will either receive a PD-1 antibody as monotherapy or a combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 targeting antibodies. Patients are selected for monotherapy or combination therapy based on tumor staging, clinical- and biochemical status. The combination treatment has shown improved overall survival as compared to monotherapy, but also increased toxicity. The UV1 vaccine comprises 3 long peptides covering the active site of the tumor-associated antigen telomerase. Through UV1 vaccinations, patients induce telomerase-specific T cells with the potential of providing the necessary inflammatory tumor microenvironment for optimal immune-mediated tumor control. The UV1 vaccine is shown to induce immune responses in HLA-unselected patients across 3 completed phase I trials, covering MM, NSCLC, and prostate cancer. Accumulating evidence suggests that CPI efficacy is reliant on spontaneous anti-tumor immune responses. UV1 vaccination thus serves to increase CPI efficacy by providing the necessary anti-tumor immune responses, while the CPIs may reciprocally provide increased expansion and effector capacity of vaccine-induced T cells by blocking CTLA-4 and PD-l, respectively. The combination proposed in this trial may therefore lead to synergistic immunological activity translating to improved clinical outcome for MM patients.The INITIUM study (EudraCT no: 2019-002026-75) is an ongoing Ultimovacs sponsored, randomized, open-label, multi-center study comparing the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without UV1 vaccination in 1st line metastatic MM patients.A total of 154 patients are randomized 1:1 to either arm A: 4 cycles of nivolumab (1 mg/kg q3w) + 4 cycles of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg q3w) + 8 injections with 300 μg UV1 and 75 μg GM-CSF as adjuvant (UV1 vaccination) during the first 13 weeks, or arm B: 4 cycles of nivolumab (1 mg/kg q3w) + 4 cycles of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg q3w). Patients randomized to treatment arm A will receive three UV1 vaccinations in week 1 and one in week 2, followed by 4 UV1 vaccinations throughout the following 11weeks, totaling to 8 UV1 vaccinations.Patients will continue with nivolumab maintenance treatment (480 mg q4w) according to the label. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1) as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR).Samples of blood, feces, and tumor tissue are collected in a subset of patients for translational research purposes.Legal entity Ultimovacs ASA, Oslo, NorwayFundingUltimovacs ASA, Oslo, Norway

Citation Format: Steven O'Day, Oliver Bechter, Paul Lorigan, Marta Nyakas. Nivolumab and ipilimumab +/- UV1 vaccine as 1st line treatment in patients with malignant melanoma (INITIUM-trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT231.

Overall survival at 5 years of follow-up in a phase III trial comparing ipilimumab 10 mg/kg with 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported significantly longer overall survival (OS) with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma, with higher incidences of adverse events (AEs) at 10 mg/kg. This follow-up analysis reports a 5-year update of OS and safety.

METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial included patients with untreated or previously treated unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses. The primary end point was OS.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of 61 months, median OS was 15.7 months (95% CI 11.6 to 17.8) at 10 mg/kg and 11.5 months (95% CI 9.9 to 13.3) at 3 mg/kg (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99; p=0.04). In a subgroup analysis, median OS of patients with asymptomatic brain metastasis was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.0 to 12.8) in the 10 mg/kg group and 5.7 months (95% CI 4.2 to 7.0) in the 3 mg/kg group. In patients with wild-type or mutant BRAF tumors, median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.2 to 17.0) and 33.2 months (95% CI 19.4 to 45.2) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 11.2 months (95% CI 9.2 to 13.8) and 19.7 months (95% CI 11.6 to 25.3) in the 3 mg/kg group, respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs was 36% in the 10 mg/kg group vs 20% in the 3 mg/kg group, and deaths due to treatment-related AEs occurred in four (1%) and two patients (1%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This 61-month follow-up of a phase III trial showed sustained long-term survival in patients with advanced melanoma who started metastatic treatment with ipilimumab monotherapy, and confirmed the significant benefit for those who received ipilimumab 10 mg/kg vs 3 mg/kg. These results suggest the emergence of a plateau in the OS curve, consistent with previous ipilimumab studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01515189.

Combining a Universal Telomerase Based Cancer Vaccine With Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma - Five-Year Follow Up of a Phase I/IIa Trial

Background

Ipilimumab improves survival for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Combining a therapeutic cancer vaccine with ipilimumab may increase efficacy by providing enhanced anti-tumor immune responses. UV1 consists of three synthetic long peptides from human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). These peptides comprise epitopes recognized by T cells from cancer patients experiencing long-term survival following treatment with a first-generation hTERT vaccine, and generate long-lasting immune responses in cancer patients when used as monotherapy. The objective of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of combining UV1 with ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma.

Patients and Methods

In this phase I/IIa, single center trial [NCT02275416], patients with metastatic melanoma received repeated UV1 vaccinations, with GM-CSF as an adjuvant, in combination with ipilimumab. Patients were evaluated for safety, efficacy and immune response. Immune responses against vaccine peptides were monitored in peripheral blood by measuring antigen-specific proliferation and IFN-γ production.

Results

Twelve patients were recruited. Adverse events were mainly diarrhea, injection site reaction, pruritus, rash, nausea and fatigue. Ten patients showed a Th1 immune response to UV1 peptides, occurring early and after few vaccinations. Three patients obtained a partial response and one patient a complete response. Overall survival was 50% at 5 years.

Conclusion

Treatment was well tolerated. The rapid expansion of UV1-specific Th1 cells in the majority of patients indicates synergy between UV1 vaccine and CTLA-4 blockade. This may have translated into clinical benefit, encouraging the combination of UV1 vaccination with standard of care treatment regimes containing ipilimumab/CTLA-4 blocking antibodies.

Melanoma recurrence patterns and management after adjuvant targeted therapy: a multicentre analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant targeted therapy (TT) improves relapse free survival in patients with resected BRAF mutant stage III melanoma. The outcomes and optimal management of patients who relapse after adjuvant TT is unknown.

METHODS

Patients from twenty-one centres with recurrent melanoma after adjuvant TT were included. Disease characteristics, adjuvant therapy, recurrence, treatment at relapse and outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients developed recurrent melanoma; nineteen (22%) during adjuvant TT. Median time to first recurrence was 18 months and median follow-up from first recurrence was 31 months. Fifty-eight (68%) patients received immunotherapy (IT) or TT as 1st line systemic therapy at either first or subsequent recurrence and had disease that was assessable for response. Response to anti-PD-1 (±trial agent), combination ipilimumab-nivolumab, TT rechallenge and ipilimumab monotherapy was 63%, 62% 25% and 10% respectively. Twenty-eight (33%) patients had died at census, all from melanoma. Two-year OS was 84% for anti-PD-1 therapy (±trial agent), 92% for combination ipilimumab and nivolumab, 49% for TT and 45% for ipilimumab monotherapy (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who relapse after adjuvant TT respond well to subsequent anti-PD-1 based therapy and have outcomes similar to those seen when first line anti-PD-1 therapy is used in stage IV melanoma.

Association of BRAF V600E/K Mutation Status and Prior BRAF/MEK Inhibition With Pembrolizumab Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials

Importance

The optimal sequencing of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy for BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma is not well established.

Objective

To assess the association of BRAF wild-type (WT) or BRAF V600E/K-mutant status and BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) with or without MEK inhibitor (MEKi) therapy with response to pembrolizumab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study is a post hoc subgroup analysis of pooled data from 3 multinational, multisite studies: KEYNOTE-001 (data cutoff September 1, 2017), KEYNOTE-002 (data cutoff May 30, 2018), and KEYNOTE-006 (data cutoff December 4, 2017). Patients included in this analysis were adults with advanced melanoma and known BRAF V600E/K tumor status who had received pembrolizumab.

Interventions

Patients received pembrolizumab in dosages of 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

End points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and overall survival (OS). Objective response rates, 4-year PFS, and OS rates were compared in the following patient subgroups: BRAF WT vs BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma and BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma with vs without previous treatment with BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy.

Results

The overall study population (N = 1558) included 944 men (60.6%) and 614 women (39.4%). The mean (SD) age was 60.0 years (14.0). The ORR was 38.3% (596/1558), 4-year PFS rate was 22.0%, and 4-year OS rate was 36.9%. For patients with BRAF WT (n = 1124) and BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma (n = 434), ORR was 39.8% (n = 447) and 34.3% (n = 149), 4-year PFS rate was 22.9% and 19.8%, and 4-year OS rate was 37.5% and 35.1%, respectively. Patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma who had (n = 271) vs had not (n = 163) previously received BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy had baseline characteristics with worse prognosis; ORR was 28.4% (n = 77) and 44.2% (n = 72), 4-year PFS rate was 15.2% and 27.8%, and 4-year OS rate was 26.9% and 49.3%, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this subgroup analysis support the use of pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced melanoma regardless of BRAF V600E/K mutation status or receipt of prior BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy.

Long-Term Outcomes of a Phase I Study With UV1, a Second Generation Telomerase Based Vaccine, in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is a target antigen for cancer immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have tested a novel hTERT vaccine, UV1, designed to give high population coverage. UV1 is composed of three synthetic long peptides containing multiple epitopes identified by epitope spreading data from long-term survivors from previous hTERT vaccination trials. Eighteen non-HLA-typed patients with stage III/IV NSCLC with no evidence of progression after prior treatments, were enrolled in a phase I dose-escalation study of UV1 vaccination with GM-CSF as adjuvant, evaluating safety, immune response, and long-term clinical outcome. Treatment with UV1 was well tolerated with no serious adverse events observed. Seventeen patients were evaluable for tumor response; 15 patients had stable disease as best response. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.7 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 28.2 months. The OS at 4 years was 39% (7/18). Five patients are alive (median survival 5.6 years), and none of these are known to have received checkpoint therapy after vaccination. UV1 induced specific T-cell responses in the majority (67%) of patients. Immune responses were dynamic and long lasting. Both immune response (IR) and OS were dose related. More patients in the highest UV1 dosage group (700 μg) developed IRs compared to the other groups, and the IRs were stronger and occurred earlier. Patients in this group had a 4-year OS of 83%. The safety and clinical outcome data favor 700 μg as the preferred UV1 dose in this patient population. These results provide a rationale for further clinical studies in NSCLC with UV1 vaccination in combination with immune checkpoint blockade.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT0178909.

Five-Year Analysis of Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III Melanoma

BACKGROUND

In the previously reported primary analysis of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in significantly longer relapse-free survival than placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. To confirm the stability of the relapse-free survival benefit, longer-term data were needed.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 870 patients who had resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations to receive 12 months of oral dabrafenib (at a dose of 150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Here, we report 5-year results for relapse-free survival and survival without distant metastasis as the site of the first relapse. Overall survival was not analyzed, since the required number of events to trigger the final overall survival analysis had not been reached.

RESULTS

The minimum duration of follow-up was 59 months (median patient follow-up, 60 months for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 58 months for placebo). At 5 years, the percentage of patients who were alive without relapse was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48 to 58) with dabrafenib plus trametinib and 36% (95% CI, 32 to 41) with placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.61). The percentage of patients who were alive without distant metastasis was 65% (95% CI, 61 to 71) with dabrafenib plus trametinib and 54% (95% CI, 49 to 60) with placebo (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.70). No clinically meaningful between-group difference in the incidence or severity of serious adverse events was reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 5-year follow-up of a phase 3 trial involving patients who had resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations, 12 months of adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in a longer duration of survival without relapse or distant metastasis than placebo with no apparent long-term toxic effects. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).

BRAF mutational status as a prognostic marker for survival in malignant melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The analysis of the BRAF mutational status has been established as a standard procedure during diagnosis of advanced malignant melanoma due to the fact that BRAF inhibitors constitute a cornerstone in the treatment of metastatic disease. However, the general impact of BRAF mutational status on survival remains unclear. Our study aimed to assess the underlying prognostic significance of BRAF mutant versus wild type (WT) malignant melanoma on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Material and methods: A systematic literature search in EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed. Studies were included if they reported survival outcomes for BRAF mutant versus WT patients as hazard ratios (HR) or in Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used to pool HRs across the studies.Results: Data from 52 studies, representing 7519 patients, were pooled for analysis of OS. The presence of a BRAF mutation was statistically significantly associated with a reduced OS (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.23 [1.09-1.38]), however, with substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I²: 58.0%). Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses showed that age, sex and BRAF mutation testing method did not have a significant effect on the OS HR. BRAF mutant melanoma showed comparable effect on DFS to non-BRAF mutant melanoma in stage I-III melanoma (combined HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.92-1.46), and on PFS in stage III-IV (HR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.68-1.40)).Conclusion: Although there was substantial heterogeneity between the studies, the overall results demonstrated a poorer prognosis and OS in patients harbouring BRAF mutations. Future studies should take this into account when evaluating epidemiological data and treatment effects of new interventions in patients with malignant melanoma.

Long-term benefit of adjuvant dabrafenib + trametinib (D+T) in patients (pts) with resected stage III BRAF V600–mutant melanoma: Five-year analysis of COMBI-AD

10001

Background: Previous results of the COMBI-AD trial (NCT01682083) showed a significant relapse-free survival (RFS) benefit with 12 mo of adjuvant D+T vs placebo (PBO) in pts with high-risk resected stage III BRAF V600E/K–mutant melanoma. In the primary analysis, 3-year RFS rates with D+T vs PBO were 58% vs 39% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.39-0.58]; P < .001). An interim analysis of overall survival (OS) yielded 3-year OS rates of 86% with D+T vs 77% with PBO (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.42-0.79]). Here we report data from 5-year analyses including long-term RFS and an updated cure rate model. Methods: COMBI-AD is a randomized, Phase III trial evaluating 12 mo of adjuvant D 150 mg twice daily + T 2 mg once daily vs 2 matched PBOs in pts with resected stage III BRAF V600E/K–mutant melanoma. Pts were stratified by BRAF status and disease stage (per AJCC 7 criteria). The primary endpoint is RFS; secondary endpoints include OS and distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS). A Weibull mixture cure rate model was applied to estimate the fraction of pts who will remain relapse free in the long term. As all patients had completed treatment by the time of the primary analysis, updated safety analyses were not performed. Results: This analysis represents a median follow-up of 60 mo for the D+T arm and 59 mo for the PBO arm. As of the data cutoff (Nov 8, 2019), 190 of 438 pts in the D+T arm and 262 of 432 pts in the PBO arm had an RFS event. Median RFS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 47.9 mo-NR) with D+T vs 16.6 mo (95% CI, 12.7-22.1 mo) with PBO (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42-0.61]). The 4- and 5-year RFS rates were 55% (95% CI, 50%-60%) and 52% (95% CI, 48%-58%) with D+T vs 38% (95% CI, 34%-43%) and 36% (95% CI, 32%-41%) with PBO. These findings match those estimated by the cure rate model. The RFS benefit with D+T was evident across all AJCC 7 substages (HR [95% CI]: IIIA, 0.61 [0.35-1.07]; IIIB, 0.50 [0.37-0.67]; IIIC, 0.48 [0.36-0.64]). Median DMFS was NR in either arm but favored D+T (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.44-0.70]). OS was not updated at this data cutoff as the prespecified number of events for the final OS analysis had not yet occurred. Conclusions: This 5-year analysis confirms the long-term benefit of adjuvant D+T in pts with resected stage III BRAF V600E/K–mutant melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01682083.

Melanoma recurrence after adjuvant targeted therapy: A multicenter analysis

10016

Background: Adjuvant targeted therapy (TT) improves relapse free survival (RFS) in patients (pts) with BRAF mutant stage 3 melanoma. The outcomes and optimal management of pts who relapse after adjuvant TT is unknown. Methods: Pts from 21 centres with recurrent melanoma after adjuvant TT were included. Disease characteristics, adjuvant therapy, recurrence, treatment at relapse and outcomes were examined. Results: 87 pts developed recurrent melanoma; 21 (24%) during and 66 (76%) after cessation of adjuvant TT. Median time to 1st recurrence was 16.3 months with median follow up after 1st recurrence of 31 months. 30 (34%) pts recurred locoregionally, 51 (59%) pts developed distant recurrence and 6 (7%) pts had both. Of those who recurred locoregionally, 23/30 (77%) pts underwent surgery to no evidence of disease, only 3 (13%) of which received adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy, and 15/30 (50%) subsequently developed distant disease. 29 (33.3%) pts have died. 75 (86%) pts received systemic therapy at either 1st or subsequent recurrence. 40 (46%) pts received 1st line anti-PD1 based therapy (single agent anti-PD1, anti-PD1 with ipilimumab or anti-PD1 with investigational agent), 12 (14%) pts received ipilimumab monotherapy, 18 (21%) pts received retreatment with combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors and 5 (6%) pts received other agents (chemotherapy, TVEC). 57 (66%) pts had disease that was assessable for response rate (RR). RR after relapse was 69.7% (23/33) to 1st line anti-PD-1 based therapy, 46% (6/13) to TT and 9% (1/11) to ipilimumab monotherapy (Table). Median overall survival (OS) from date of 1st recurrence for all pts was not reached. OS varied by drug class received as 1st line systemic therapy after relapse. 3 year OS was 79% for anti-PD-1 based therapy, 55% for TT and 25% for ipilimumab. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that pts who relapse after adjuvant TT may respond to subsequent immunotherapy at similar rates to the treatment naïve setting. [Table: see text]

A phase I/IIa clinical trial investigating the therapeutic cancer vaccine UV1 in combination with ipilimumab in patients with malignant melanoma: Four-year survival update

62

Background: Combining checkpoint blockade with a cancer vaccine may induce broader immune responses, leading to better clinical outcomes. UV1 targets the enzyme telomerase (hTERT) which is expressed in almost all cancer types and is essential for the immortality of cancer cells and a hallmark of cancer. UV1 consists of three synthetic long peptides and vaccination induces Th1 responses in most patients irrespective of HLA type. This trial explores the synergistic effect of CTLA-4 blockade and hTERT vaccination, allowing unchecked expansion of hTERT-specific T cell clones. Increased number of tumor-specific T cells is associated with a favorable clinical outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma. We investigated the safety, immunological and clinical responses of UV1 vaccine and ipilimumab in this group of patients. Methods: In a phase I/IIa, single-center trial (NCT02275416) patients with metastatic melanoma received treatment with UV1 (300 µg) + GM-CSF (75 µg) as an adjuvant, combined with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg). Safety was assessed according to CTCAE v. 4.0, and tumor responses according to RECIST v.1.1. Immune responses against UV1 peptides were monitored in peripheral mononuclear blood cells by using 3H-thymidine proliferation and IFN-γ ELISPOT assays. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) estimations were based on whole-exome sequencing. Results: 12 patients were treated from Feb to Nov 2015. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Adverse events mainly included injection site reactions and diarrhea. Immune responses occurred very early and 10/11 evaluable patients showed an immune response. Three patients obtained a partial response, and one patient a complete response. 3-year overall survival (OS) was 67%. 4-year survival outcome will be presented along with baseline characteristics and TMB estimations. Conclusions: Combining UV1 and ipilimumab is safe and induces clinical responses in melanoma. The high proportion of immunological responders and early induction of detectable immune responses suggest synergism. OS compares favorably to historical controls. Clinical trial information: NCT02275416.

Soluble AXL as a marker of disease progression and survival in melanoma

Receptor tyrosine kinase AXL is a one-pass transmembrane protein upregulated in cancers and associated with lower survival and therapy resistance. AXL can be cleaved by the A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinases (ADAM)10 and ADAM17, yielding a soluble version of the protein. Elevated soluble AXL (sAXL) has been reported to be associated with disease progression in hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cancer, neurofibromatosis type 1 and inflammatory diseases. In the present work, we analyzed sAXL levels in blood from melanoma patients and showed that sAXL increases with disease progression. Additionally, increased sAXL levels were found correlated with shorter two-year survival in stage IV patients treated with ipilimumab. Furthermore, we showed that sAXL levels were related to the percentage of cells expressing AXL in resected melanoma lymph node metastases. This finding was verified in vitro, where sAXL levels in the cell media corresponded to AXL expression in the cells. AXL inhibition using the small-molecular inhibitor BGB324 reduced sAXL levels, while the cellular expression was elevated through increased protein stability. Our findings signify that quantification of sAXL blood levels is a simple and easily assessable method to determine cellular AXL levels and should be further evaluated for its use as a biomarker of disease progression and treatment response.

Abstract CT068: A Phase I trial of LXS196, a novel PKC inhibitor for metastatic uveal melanoma

We assessed the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and efficacy of the PKC inhibitor LXS196 in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM). As of 30 Sep 2018, 68 patients received LXS196 at doses ranging from 100 to 1000 mg once daily (QD; 38 patients) and 200 to 400 mg twice daily (BID; 30 patients). All patients in the QD regimen had discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. Five patients in the BID regimen remain on study. LDH was &gt; ULN in 38 patients (55.9%), and 60 patients (88.2%) had liver involvement.

Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1 were reported in 7 of 38 patients on the QD schedule and in 2 of 17 patients on the BID schedule who were evaluable for the dose determination. The most common DLT was hypotension, manageable with LXS196 interruption and dose reduction.

The most frequent AEs (all grades, in ≥ 20% of patients) suspected to be related to LXS196 in patients across both dosing schedules (n = 68) included nausea (66.2%), diarrhea (45.6%), vomiting (30.9%), hypotension (22.1%), increased ALT (22.1%), and fatigue (20.6%). The majority of gastrointestinal and constitutional AEs were of low grade (grade 1 or 2). Grade 3 or 4 AEs suspected to be related to LXS196 were reported in 17 patients (25.0%), the most frequent being hypotension (8.8%). BID dosing was better tolerated than QD dosing with fewer grade 3 or 4 AEs reported (20% with BID vs 28.9% with QD dosing) and fewer drug-related SAEs (6.7% with BID vs 15.8% with QD). In this study, MTDs were determined at 500mg QD and 400 mg BID and the RDE was declared at 300mg BID. The most common AEs suspected to be related to LXS196 (any grade, in &gt;15% of patients) at the RDE (n = 18) included nausea (77.8%), diarrhea (61.1%), vomiting (38.9%), increased ALT (27.8%), asthenia, dry skin and rash (22.2% each), hypotension, fatigue, increased AST, dermatitis acneiform, and peripheral edema (16.7% each).

Clinical PK demonstrates rapid absorption of LXS196 with Tmax of ~1 hr post dose and consistent terminal T1/2 across different doses (~ 11 hr). Exposure at doses above 300 mg QD and 200 mg BID are in the efficacious range from preclinical projections. LXS196 results in reduction of pMARCKS and pPKC delta, evident of target engagement in on-treatment tumor biopsies.

Overall, amongst 66 evaluable patients, per RECIST v1.1, 6 had a PR (2 in QD; 4 in BID) and 45 had SD as their best response. At the RDE, of 17 evaluable patients, 2 had confirmed PRs and 12 had SD as their best response (including 2 patients with &gt; 30% tumor reduction/unconfirmed PRs). The median duration of exposure is 3.71 months (range; 1.81 - 15.28 months) and 4.6 months (range; 0.33 - 20.01 months) for patients in the QD and BID regimens, respectively. Of the 5 ongoing patients in the BID regimen, 2 maintain a PR (200 and 300 mg BID) and 3 have SD (all at 300 mg BID). All 5 patients have remained on study for &gt; 13 months.

These results suggest encouraging clinical activity of LXS196 as a single agent with manageable toxicity profile in patients with MUM.

Citation Format: Ellen Kapiteijn, Matteo Carlino, Valentina Boni, Delphine Loirat, Frank Speetjens, John Park, Emiliano Calvo, Richard Carvajal, Marta Nyakas, Juan Gonzalez-Maffe, Xu Zhu, Ramu Thiruvamoor, Padmaja Yerramilli-Rao, Sophie Piperno-Neumann. A Phase I trial of LXS196, a novel PKC inhibitor for metastatic uveal melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT068.

Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in the absence of disease progression or treatment limiting toxicity: clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blocking monoclonal antibodies improve the overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma but the optimal duration of treatment has not been established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This academic real-world cohort study investigated the outcome of 185 advanced melanoma patients who electively discontinued anti-PD-1 therapy with pembrolizumab (N = 167) or nivolumab (N = 18) in the absence of disease progression (PD) or treatment limiting toxicity (TLT) at 14 medical centres across Europe and Australia.

RESULTS

Median time on treatment was 12 months (range 0.7-43). The best objective tumour response at the time of treatment discontinuation was complete response (CR) in 117 (63%) patients, partial response (PR) in 44 (24%) patients and stable disease (SD) in 16 (9%) patients; 8 (4%) patients had no evaluable disease (NE). After a median follow-up of 18 months (range 0.7-48) after treatment discontinuation, 78% of patients remained free of progression. Median time to progression was 12 months (range 2-23). PD was less frequent in patients with CR (14%) compared with patients with PR (32%) and SD (50%). Six out of 19 (32%) patients who were retreated with an anti-PD-1 at the time of PD obtained a new antitumour response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world cohort of advanced melanoma patients discontinuing anti-PD-1 therapy in the absence of TLT or PD, the duration of anti-PD-1 therapy was shorter when compared with clinical trials. In patients obtaining a CR, and being treated for >6 months, the risk of relapse after treatment discontinuation was low. Patients achieving a PR or SD as best tumour response were at higher risk for progression after discontinuing therapy, and defining optimal treatment duration in such patients deserves further study. Retreatment with an anti-PD-1 at the time of progression may lead to renewed antitumour activity in some patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02673970 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02673970?cond=melanoma&cntry=BE&city=Jette&rank=3).

Association between baseline disease characteristics and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600-mutant resected stage III melanoma treated with adjuvant dabrafenib (D) + trametinib (T) or placebo (PBO)

9582

Background: In the COMBI-AD trial (NCT01682083), 12 mo of adjuvant D+T led to significant improvement of RFS vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; P < .001) in pts with resected BRAF V600–mutant stage III melanoma; 3- and 4-year RFS rates were 59% and 54%, respectively. Previous results demonstrated consistent treatment benefit across baseline disease stage according to AJCC edition 7 or 8. Here, we further explored the association between baseline disease characteristics and RFS to identify pt subgroups likely to benefit from adjuvant treatment. Methods: Randomized pts with completely resected BRAF V600E/K–mutant stage III melanoma received 12 mo of adjuvant D (150 mg BID) + T (2 mg QD) or PBO. Within each subgroup, predictive value was explored using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and HRs were calculated using a Pike estimator. Results: Minimum follow-up was 40 mo for 870 enrolled pts (D+T, 438; PBO, 432). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated treatment benefit across all subgroups analyzed. Assessment of RFS by extent of primary tumor (T stage) showed consistent benefit favoring D+T vs PBO (HR [95% CI]; T1, 0.42 [0.25-0.70]; T2, 0.51 [0.34-0.76]; T3, 0.55 [0.39-0.77]; T4, 0.42 [0.29-0.60]). HRs by nodal burden (N stage) also showed consistent treatment benefit (N1, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37-0.72]; N2, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.28-0.53]; N3, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.41-0.83]). Substantial treatment benefit was observed in pts with baseline in-transit metastases (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24-0.82]) and those with no in-transit metastases detected at baseline (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.60]). When RFS was assessed according to melanoma presentation, treatment benefit favoring D+T vs PBO was observed in pts with superficial spreading melanoma (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.35-0.66]) and those with nodular melanoma (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.37-0.75]). Conclusions: These results confirm earlier findings showing that treatment benefit with adjuvant D+T vs PBO is independent of baseline factors. Clinical trial information: NCT01682083.

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with resected, high-risk melanoma with BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutations treated with adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (COMBI-AD): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 COMBI-AD study, patients with resected, stage III melanoma with BRAF^V600E or BRAF^V600K mutations received adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib or placebo. The primary analysis showed that dabrafenib plus trametinib significantly improved relapse-free survival at 3 years. These results led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of dabrafenib plus trametinib as adjuvant treatment for patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF^V600E or BRAF^V600K mutations. Here, we report the patient-reported outcomes from COMBI-AD.

METHODS

COMBI-AD was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done at 169 sites in 25 countries. Study participants were aged 18 years or older and had complete resection of stage IIIA (lymph node metastases >1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC cutaneous melanoma as per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria, with BRAF^V600E or BRAF^V600K mutations, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system, stratified by mutation type and disease stage, to receive oral dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus oral trametinib (2 mg once daily) or matching placebos for 12 months. Patients, physicians, and the investigators who analysed the data were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival, reported elsewhere. Health-related quality of life, reported here, was a prespecified exploratory endpoint, and was assessed with the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire in the intention-to-treat population. We used a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis to assess differences in health-related quality of life between groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01682083. The trial is ongoing, but is no longer recruiting participants.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, 870 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dabrafenib plus trametinib (n=438) or matching placebos (n=432). Data were collected until the data cutoff for analyses of the primary endpoint (June 30, 2017). The median follow-up was 34 months (IQR 28-39) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group and 33 months (20·5-39) in the placebo group. During the 12-month treatment phase, there were no significant or clinically meaningful changes from baseline between groups in EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) or utility scores. During treatment, there were no clinically meaningful differences in VAS scores or utility scores in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group between patients who did and did not experience the most common adverse events. During long-term follow-up (range 15-48 months), VAS and utility scores were similar between groups and did not differ from baseline scores. At recurrence, there were significant decreases in VAS scores in both the dabrafenib plus trametinib group (mean change -6·02, SD 20·57; p=0·0032) and the placebo group (-6·84, 20·86; p<0·0001); the mean change in utility score also differed significantly at recurrence for both groups (dabrafenib plus trametinib -0·0626, 0·1911, p<0·0001; placebo -0·0748, 0·2182, p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

These findings show that dabrafenib plus trametinib did not affect patient-reported outcome scores during or after adjuvant treatment, and suggest that preventing or delaying relapse with adjuvant therapy could be beneficial in this setting.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy with ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma

New therapies, including the anti‐cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)‐4 antibody, ipilimumab, is approved for metastatic melanoma. Prognostic biomarkers need to be identified, because the treatment has serious side effects. Serum samples were obtained before and during treatment from 56 patients with metastatic or unresectable malignant melanoma, receiving treatment with ipilimumab in a national Phase IV study (NCT0268196). Expression of a panel of 17 inflammatory‐related markers reflecting different pathways including extracellular matrix remodeling and fibrosis, vascular inflammation and monocyte/macrophage activation were measured at baseline and the second and/or third course of treatment with ipilimumab. Six candidate proteins [endostatin, osteoprotegerin (OPG), C‐reactive protein (CRP), pulmonary and activation‐regulated chemokine (PARC), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and galectin‐3 binding‐protein (Gal3BP)] were persistently higher in non‐survivors. In particular, high Gal3BP and endostatin levels were also independently associated with poor 2‐year survival after adjusting for lactate dehydrogenase, M‐stage and number of organs affected. A 1 standard deviation increase in endostatin gave 1·74 times [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·10–2·78, P = 0·019] and for Gal3BP 1·52 times (95% CI = 1·01–2·29, P = 0·047) higher risk of death in the adjusted model. Endostatin and Gal3BP may represent prognostic biomarkers for patients on ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma and should be further evaluated. Owing to the non‐placebo design, we could only relate our findings to prognosis during ipilimumab treatment.

Longer Follow-Up Confirms Relapse-Free Survival Benefit With Adjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Patients With Resected BRAF V600-Mutant Stage III Melanoma

PURPOSE

Dabrafenib plus trametinib improved relapse-free survival (RFS) versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; P < .001) in patients with resected BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma (BRF115532; COMBI-AD; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01682083). We present an updated RFS analysis on the basis of extended study follow-up and a cure-rate model analysis to estimate the fraction of patients expected to remain relapse free long term.

METHODS

In this phase III trial, patients with resected BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma were randomly assigned to 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib versus placebo. We report updated RFS (primary end point) and distant metastasis-free survival. RFS was also analyzed by subgroups defined by baseline disease stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th and 8th editions), nodal metastatic burden, and ulceration status. The fraction of patients who remained relapse free long term was estimated using a Weibull mixture cure-rate model.

RESULTS

At median follow-up of 44 months (dabrafenib plus trametinib) and 42 months (placebo), 3- and 4-year RFS rates were 59% (95% CI, 55% to 64%) and 54% (95% CI, 49% to 59%) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib arm and 40% (95% CI, 35% to 45%) and 38% (95% CI, 34% to 44%) in the placebo arm, respectively (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.59). Distant metastasis-free survival also favored dabrafenib plus trametinib (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.67). The estimated cure rate was 54% (95% CI, 49% to 59%) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib arm compared with 37% (95% CI, 32% to 42%) in the placebo arm. Subgroup analysis of RFS demonstrated similar treatment benefit regardless of baseline factors, including disease stage, nodal metastatic burden, and ulceration.

CONCLUSION

Longer follow-up confirmed RFS benefit with dabrafenib plus trametinib. Subgroup analysis suggested that dabrafenib plus trametinib benefited patients regardless of baseline factors.

Outcomes by line of therapy and programmed death ligand 1 expression in patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab or ipilimumab in KEYNOTE-006: A randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Predictive biomarkers of patients likely to benefit from anti-programmed death 1 inhibitor therapy have clinical relevance. We examined whether line of therapy or tumour programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression affects the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, compared with ipilimumab, in advanced melanoma.

METHODS

Of 834 patients enrolled in the randomised, open-label phase III KEYNOTE-006 study, 833 were included in this analysis. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 or 3 weeks (for 24 months) or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (for four doses) until disease progression/intolerable toxicity. This analysis evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Data cut-off: 03 November 2016.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 60.3% were male, 65.9% were treatment naive and 80.6% had PD-L1-positive tumours (median follow-up was 33.9 months). Twenty-four-month survival rates were higher with pembrolizumab than with ipilimumab in treatment-naive (PFS 31.0% versus 14.6%; OS 58.0% versus 44.7%) and previously treated patients (PFS 25.7% versus 11.3%; OS 49.2% versus 37.9%). Twenty-four-month survival rates were higher with pembrolizumab than with ipilimumab in patients with PD-L1-positive tumours (PFS 33.2% versus 13.1%; OS 58.4% versus 45.0%) and similar in PD-L1-negative tumours (PFS 14.9% versus NR [no data at 24 months for a PFS estimate]; OS 43.6% versus 31.8%). Safety of pembrolizumab by subgroup was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support pembrolizumab monotherapy as standard of care in patients with advanced melanoma, regardless of first- or second-line therapy or PD-L1 status. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01866319.

Abstract 5713: Promising predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma

Aim: to explore biomarkers in order to predict outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma who have had immunotherapy with ipilimumab in a real-world setting. Metastatic melanoma is a very aggressive, incurable cancer with historically few therapeutic options and poor survival. Immunotherapy represents a revolution for metastatic melanoma treatment but there is a lack of biomarkers to predict treatment response. Material and methods: In the Norwegian National Phase 4 Multicenter Study, IPI4, 150 patients were included to receive ipilimumab (anti-CTLA3). A subgroup of 73 patients (4 screening failure) was included at Oslo University Hospital -The Norwegian Radium Hospital. Serum was available from 56 patients of this subgroup and were examined before and during ipilimumab treatment concerning possible predictive biomarkers. Expression of a panel of 17 inflammatory markers reflecting different inflammatory pathways including extra cellular matrix remodeling and fibrosis, vascular inflammation, notch signaling, inflammation in general and monocyte/macrophage activation were measured at baseline and at the 2nd and/or 3rd treatment with ipilimumab. Results: During an average 33.7 months follow-up, 33 (59%) patients died. Six promising candidates (endostatin, osteoprotegerin, C-reactive protein, pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokine and galectin-3 binding-protein) were higher in non-survivors. In particular, high endostatin and galectin-3 binding protein levels were independently associated with poor long time survival also in adjusted analysis (age, gender, lactate dehydrogenase). A 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in Gal3BP gave a 1.8 x times higher risk of death (95% CI 1.10-2.95, p=0.019) while a 1 SD increase in endostatin was associated with a 2x higher risk of death (95% CI 1.12-3.64, p=0.020) in the final model. Conclusion: Endostatin and galectin-3 binding protein may represent biomarkers for prognosis during immunotherapy with ipilimumab and should be further evaluated.

Citation Format: Marta Nyakas, Elin Aamdal, Tormod Guren, Steinar Aamdal, Kari Dolven Jacobsen, Paal Brunsvig, Kristin Austlid Tasken, Gunhild Mælandsmo, Arne Yndestad, Bente Halvorsen, Paal Aukrust, Thor Ueland. Promising predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5713.

Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib plus the MEK inhibitor trametinib improved survival in patients with advanced melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. We sought to determine whether adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib would improve outcomes in patients with resected, stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 870 patients with completely resected, stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations to receive oral dabrafenib at a dose of 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib at a dose of 2 mg once daily (combination therapy, 438 patients) or two matched placebo tablets (432 patients) for 12 months. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, freedom from relapse, and safety.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the estimated 3-year rate of relapse-free survival was 58% in the combination-therapy group and 39% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.58; P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival rate was 86% in the combination-therapy group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.79; P=0.0006), but this level of improvement did not cross the prespecified interim analysis boundary of P=0.000019. Rates of distant metastasis-free survival and freedom from relapse were also higher in the combination-therapy group than in the placebo group. The safety profile of dabrafenib plus trametinib was consistent with that observed with the combination in patients with metastatic melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant use of combination therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in a significantly lower risk of recurrence in patients with stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations than the adjuvant use of placebo and was not associated with new toxic effects. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01682083 ; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15 .).

Phase I Dose-Escalation and -Expansion Study of the BRAF Inhibitor Encorafenib (LGX818) in Metastatic BRAF-Mutant Melanoma

Purpose: Encorafenib, a selective BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi), has a pharmacologic profile that is distinct from that of other clinically active BRAFis. We evaluated encorafenib in a phase I study in patients with BRAFi treatment-naïve and pretreated BRAF-mutant melanoma.Experimental Design: The pharmacologic activity of encorafenib was first characterized preclinically. Encorafenib monotherapy was then tested across a range of once-daily (50-700 mg) or twice-daily (75-150 mg) regimens in a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion study in adult patients with histologically confirmed advanced/metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma. Study objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D), characterize the safety and tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile, and assess the preliminary antitumor activity of encorafenib.Results: Preclinical data demonstrated that encorafenib inhibited BRAF V600E kinase activity with a prolonged off-rate and suppressed proliferation and tumor growth of BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma models. In the dose-escalation phase, 54 patients (29 BRAFi-pretreated and 25 BRAFi-naïve) were enrolled. Seven patients in the dose-determining set experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Encorafenib at a dose of 300 mg once daily was declared the RP2D. In the expansion phase, the most common all-cause adverse events were nausea (66%), myalgia (63%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (54%). In BRAFi-naïve patients, the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 60% and 12.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.4-not reached (NR)]. In BRAFi-pretreated patients, the ORR and mPFS were 22% and 1.9 months (95% CI, 0.9-3.7).Conclusions: Once-daily dosing of single-agent encorafenib had a distinct tolerability profile and showed varying antitumor activity across BRAFi-pretreated and BRAFi-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5339-48. ©2017 AACR.

Initial efficacy of anti-lymphocyte activation gene-3 (anti–LAG-3; BMS-986016) in combination with nivolumab (nivo) in pts with melanoma (MEL) previously treated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy

9520

Background: Signaling via LAG-3 and other T-cell inhibitory receptors (eg, PD-1) can lead to T-cell dysfunction and tumor immune escape. Simultaneous blockade of LAG-3 + PD-1 may synergistically restore T-cell activation and enhance antitumor immunity. In a phase 1/2a study, BMS-986016 (IgG4 mAb targeting LAG-3) ± nivo (IgG4 mAb targeting PD-1) demonstrated tolerability, peripheral T-cell activation, and preliminary clinical activity (NCT01968109; Lipson E, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4[s1]:173 [P232]). Here we describe preliminary efficacy of BMS-986016 + nivo in pts with MEL whose disease progressed on/after prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, along with updated safety from all dose expansion pts. Methods: Pts with MEL must have had prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 (± anti–CTLA-4 or BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and progressive disease (PD). Pts received BMS-986016 80 mg + nivo 240 mg IV Q2W. Primary objectives were safety and objective response rate (ORR; complete [CR] + partial [PR] response), disease control rate (DCR; CR + uCR + PR + uPR + stable disease [SD] > 12 wk), and duration of response (RECIST v1.1). Results: At data cutoff, 43 pts with MEL had been treated with BMS-986016 + nivo following PD on/after prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 with known prior best responses of 1 CR, 9 PR, 12 SD, and 16 PD. Of the 43 pts, 30 (70%) also had prior anti–CTLA-4, 20 (47%) had ≥ 3 prior therapies, and 15 (35%) had BRAFmutations .In the 31 efficacy-evaluable pts to date, ORR was 16% (confirmed/unconfirmed) and DCR was 45% with benefit observed even in some pts refractory to prior anti–PD-1. Evaluations are ongoing for most pts, with median treatment duration of 10 wk for all 43 pts. Immunopathologic (eg, PD-1/PD-L1 and LAG-3 expression) and clinical characteristics of responders vs nonresponders will be presented. Any grade and grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 46% and 9%, respectively, across all dose expansion pts (n = 129). Conclusion: Addition of BMS-986016 to nivolumab demonstrates encouraging initial efficacy in pts with MEL whose disease progressed on/after prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, and a safety profile similar to nivolumab monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01968109.

Real life outcome of advanced melanoma patients who discontinue pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) in the absence of disease progression

9539

Background: PEMBRO improves survival of patients (pts) with advanced melanoma. Optimal duration of treatment in responding pts hasn’t been established. Methods: 12 European hospitals collected data from 509 pts treated with PEMBRO outside an interventional clinical trial. Outcome was evaluated for pts who discontinued PEMBRO in the absence of progressive disease [PD]. Results: After a median follow up of 56 wks [range 1-135], median PFS was 22 wks [95% CI 18-26] and median OS was 70 wks [95% CI 59-81] for the total population. PEMBRO is ongoing in 66 [13%] pts, 344 [68%] pts stopped PEMBRO because of PD, and 99 [19%] pts discontinued PEMBRO without evidence of PD (of which 65 [13%] pts upon pt/MD decision, 26 [5%] pts due to a PEMBRO-related AE of grade < 4 and 8 [2%] pts due to a grade 5 PEMBRO-unrelated AE). Pts discontinuing PEMBRO without PD had a significant [ P <.005] better ECOG PS, less advanced tumor stage, less frequent brain metastases and more often a normal LDH at baseline. There was no significant difference between pts stopping due to AE or upon pt/MD decision. The median time on treatment for the 65 pts who stopped PEMBRO upon pt/MD decision was 55 wks [range 9-112].Their best objective response rate [BORR] was 80% [31 [48%] CR, 21 [32%] PR, 12 [18%]SD, 1[2%]NE]. After a median follow-up of 26 wks [range 1-75] after the last PEMBRO dose, 3 [5%] pts progressed (after 9, 14 and 15 wks). PEMBRO was reintroduced in 1 patient resulting in a CR. The median time on treatment of the 26 pts who stopped PEMBRO due to an AE in the absence of PD was 27 wks [range 1-103]. Their BORR was 77% [9 [35%] CR, 11 [42%] PR, 5 [19%] SD, 1 [4 %] NE]. After a median follow-up of 50 wks [range 12-109] following the last PEMBRO dose, 9 [35 %] pts progressed. Median time to PD was 26 wks [range 7-108]. PD was not correlated with BOR. PEMBRO was reintroduced in 4 pts resulting in 1 CR, 1 PD, 1 SD and 1 NE. Conclusions: In this real life experience, advanced melanoma pts who discontinue PEMBRO treatment upon pt/MD decision, in the absence of PD or AE, were at low risk for short-term recurrence. Pts stopping PEMBRO due to an AE in the absence of PD (having a shorter exposure to PEMBRO and longer FU after discontinuing treatment) seem to have a higher risk for subsequent PD.

Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

A phase 2 trial suggested increased overall survival and increased incidence of treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg compared with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma. We report a phase 3 trial comparing the benefit-risk profile of ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus 3 mg/kg.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done in 87 centres in 21 countries worldwide. Patients with untreated or previously treated unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, without previous treatment with BRAF inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors, were randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive voice response system by the permuted block method using block size 4 to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg, administered by intravenous infusion for 90 min every 3 weeks for four doses. Patients were stratified by metastasis stage, previous treatment for metastatic melanoma, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is completed and was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01515189.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 29, and July 9, 2012, 727 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg (365 patients; 364 treated) or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (362 patients; all treated). Median follow-up was 14·5 months (IQR 4·6-42·3) for the ipilimumab 10 mg/kg group and 11·2 months (4·9-29·4) for the ipilimumab 3 mg/kg group. Median overall survival was 15·7 months (95% CI 11·6-17·8) for ipilimumab 10 mg/kg compared with 11·5 months (9·9-13·3) for ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (hazard ratio 0·84, 95% CI 0·70-0·99; p=0·04). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (37 [10%] of 364 patients in the 10 mg/kg group vs 21 [6%] of 362 patients in the 3 mg/kg group), colitis (19 [5%] vs nine [2%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (12 [3%] vs two [1%]), and hypophysitis (ten [3%] vs seven [2%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 133 (37%) patients in the 10 mg/kg group and 66 (18%) patients in the 3 mg/kg group; four (1%) versus two (<1%) patients died from treatment-related adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with advanced melanoma, ipilimumab 10 mg/kg resulted in significantly longer overall survival than did ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, but with increased treatment-related adverse events. Although the treatment landscape for advanced melanoma has changed since this study was initiated, the clinical use of ipilimumab in refractory patients with unmet medical needs could warrant further assessment.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Therapeutic vaccination against autologous cancer stem cells with mRNA-transfected dendritic cells in patients with glioblastoma

Background

The growth and recurrence of several cancers appear to be driven by a population of cancer stem cells (CSCs). Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor, is invariably fatal, with a median survival of approximately 1 year. Although experimental data have suggested the importance of CSCs, few data exist regarding the potential relevance and importance of these cells in a clinical setting.

Methods

We here present the first seven patients treated with a dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine targeting CSCs in a solid tumor. Brain tumor biopsies were dissociated into single-cell suspensions, and autologous CSCs were expanded in vitro as tumorspheres. From these, CSC-mRNA was amplified and transfected into monocyte-derived autologous DCs. The DCs were aliquoted to 9–18 vaccines containing 10⁷ cells each. These vaccines were injected intradermally at specified intervals after the patients had received a standard 6-week course of post-operative radio-chemotherapy. The study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00846456.

Results

Autologous CSC cultures were established from ten out of eleven tumors. High-quality RNA was isolated, and mRNA was amplified in all cases. Seven patients were able to be weaned from corticosteroids to receive DC immunotherapy. An immune response induced by vaccination was identified in all seven patients. No patients developed adverse autoimmune events or other side effects. Compared to matched controls, progression-free survival was 2.9 times longer in vaccinated patients (median 694 vs. 236 days, p = 0.0018, log-rank test).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that vaccination against glioblastoma stem cells is safe, well-tolerated, and may prolong progression-free survival.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00262-013-1453-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Initial results from a phase I, open-label, dose escalation study of the oral BRAF inhibitor LGX818 in patients with BRAF V600 mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma

9028

Background: LGX818, a potent and selective BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) being investigated in BRAF V600 mutant melanoma, has unique biochemical properties with a dissociation half-time > 10 times longer than other BRAF inhibitors. Methods: A phase I trial of LGX818 administered orally once (qd) or twice (bid) daily in BRAF V600 tumors was initiated to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and to assess pharmacokinetics and clinical activity in BRAFi–naive or pretreated patients with BRAF V600 mutant advanced melanoma. Baseline assessment of biomarkers from MAPK/PI3K pathways and pharmacodynamics were also evaluated. Results: Fifty-four patients have been enrolled in the dose-escalation phase (dose levels [DLs], 50-700 mg qd [n=42] and 75-150 mg bid [n=12]). LGX818 plasma concentrations increased proportionally by dose with a mean t1/2 of 4 hours and steady state in ≈ 15 days. The MTD/RP2D (450 mg qd) was well tolerated. Seven patients had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT): 5 at qd (1 each with hand-foot skin reaction [HFSR], foot pain, fatigue, diarrhea/rash, insomnia/asthenia) and 2 at bid (1 facial paresis/confusion, 1 musculoskeletal pain/neuralgia). All DLTs were grade 3 and reversible. The most common adverse events (≥ 20%) suspected to be treatment related were cutaneous (rash, dry skin, HFSR, pruritus, keratosis pilaris, alopecia), pain in extremity, arthralgia, and fatigue. Squamous cell carcinoma was observed in 2 patients (1 naive and 1 pretreated). As of 30 Sept 2012, the preliminary efficacy (all DLs) in patients with at least 1 postbaseline tumor assessment was 16 partial responses [PRs] (67%; 12 confirmed) out of 24 BRAFi–naive patients and 2 PRs (8.3%; 1 confirmed) among 24 BRAFi–pretreated patients. Responses were seen at all DLs from 50 to 550 mg qd. Updated safety and efficacy including time to event endpoints will be reported. Conclusions: Initial results from this study identified the MTD/RP2D as 450 mg/day and provided an early sign of promising activity in advanced melanoma. Expansion cohorts are ongoing in BRAFi–naive and BRAFi–pretreated melanoma and colorectal cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01436656.

Phase II double-blind, randomized study of selumetinib (SEL) plus dacarbazine (DTIC) versus placebo (PBO) plus DTIC as first-line treatment for advanced BRAF-mutant cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma

9004

Background: BRAF mutations play an oncogenic role in melanomas. Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) inhibits MEK1/2 downstream of B-Raf and may have an additive effect to chemotherapy. We prospectively evaluated SEL + DTIC vs PBO + DTIC in patients with stage III-IV BRAF mutation-positive advanced cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma (NCT00936221). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) received iv DTIC 1000 mg/m2, and po SEL 75 mg or matched PBO bd as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety and tolerability. Results: A total of 385 pts were screened across 44 centers; 91 patients were randomized (SEL + DTIC, 45; PBO + DTIC, 46). One pt from each group did not receive the randomized treatment. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups, with the exception of histology, gender and previous medications. At data cut-off, 66 deaths had occurred (73% maturity) and median follow-up was 12.3 mo. OS was longer for SEL + DTIC vs PBO + DTIC (median 13.9 vs 10.5 mo), but this did not meet statistical significance (HR 0.93; 80% CI 0.67, 1.28; 1-sided p=0.3873). PFS was significantly improved for SEL + DTIC vs PBO + DTIC, median 5.6 vs 3.0 mo (HR 0.63; 80% CI 0.47, 0.84; 1-sided p=0.021). ORR was 40% with SEL + DTIC vs 26% with PBO + DTIC. Most frequent adverse events (AEs) observed with SEL + DTIC were: nausea (64%), dermatitis acneiform (52%), diarrhea (48%), vomiting (48%), and peripheral edema (43%). AEs that led to hospitalization were higher for SEL + DTIC vs PBO + DTIC (36 vs 13%), and were mostly infections and gastrointestinal disorders. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (68 vs 42%), serious AEs (50 vs 18%) and discontinuation of the randomized treatment due to AEs were higher for SEL + DTIC vs PBO + DTIC (16 vs 4%). Conclusions: Clinical activity was observed in patients with BRAF mutation-positive melanoma treated with SEL + DTIC, reflected by a nonsignificant improvement in OS and a significant benefit in PFS. Tolerability of this combination was generally consistent with the monotherapy safety profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT00936221.

Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma

BACKGROUND

Activating mutations in serine-threonine protein kinase B-RAF (BRAF) are found in 50% of patients with advanced melanoma. Selective BRAF-inhibitor therapy improves survival, as compared with chemotherapy, but responses are often short-lived. In previous trials, MEK inhibition appeared to be promising in this population.

METHODS

In this phase 3 open-label trial, we randomly assigned 322 patients who had metastatic melanoma with a V600E or V600K BRAF mutation to receive either trametinib, an oral selective MEK inhibitor, or chemotherapy in a 2:1 ratio. Patients received trametinib (2 mg orally) once daily or intravenous dacarbazine (1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks. Patients in the chemotherapy group who had disease progression were permitted to cross over to receive trametinib. Progression-free survival was the primary end point, and overall survival was a secondary end point.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months in the trametinib group and 1.5 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the trametinib group, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.63; P<0.001). At 6 months, the rate of overall survival was 81% in the trametinib group and 67% in the chemotherapy group despite crossover (hazard ratio for death, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.92; P=0.01). Rash, diarrhea, and peripheral edema were the most common toxic effects in the trametinib group and were managed with dose interruption and dose reduction; asymptomatic and reversible reduction in the cardiac ejection fraction and ocular toxic effects occurred infrequently. Secondary skin neoplasms were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Trametinib, as compared with chemotherapy, improved rates of progression-free and overall survival among patients who had metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; METRIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01245062.).

Phase I study of saracatinib (AZD0530) in combination with paclitaxel and/or carboplatin in patients with solid tumours

Background:

As a prelude to combination studies aimed at resistance reversal, this dose-escalation/dose-expansion study investigated the selective Src kinase inhibitor saracatinib (AZD0530) in combination with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel.

Methods:

Patients with advanced solid tumours received saracatinib once-daily oral tablets in combination with either carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks (q3w), paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² q3w, paclitaxel 80 mg m⁻² every 1 week (q1w), or carboplatin AUC 5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² q3w. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability.

Results:

A total of 116 patients received saracatinib 125 (N=20), 175 (N=44), 225 (N=40), 250 (N=9), or 300 mg (N=3). There were no clear dose-related trends within each chemotherapy regimen group in number or severity of adverse events (AEs). However, combining all groups, the occurrence of grade ⩾3 asthenic AEs (all causality) was dose-related (125 mg, 10% 175 mg, 20% ⩾225 mg, 33%), and grade ⩾3 neutropenia occurred more commonly at doses ⩾225 mg. There was no evidence that saracatinib affected exposure to carboplatin or paclitaxel, or vice versa. Objective responses were seen in 5 out of 44 patients (11%) receiving carboplatin plus paclitaxel q3w, and 5 out of 24 (21%) receiving paclitaxel q1w.

Conclusion:

Saracatinib doses up to 175 mg with paclitaxel with/without carboplatin showed acceptable toxicity in most patients, and are suitable for further trials.

Telomerase peptide vaccination in NSCLC: a phase II trial in stage III patients vaccinated after chemoradiotherapy and an 8-year update on a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

We report two clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients evaluating immune response, toxicity, and clinical outcome after vaccination with the telomerase peptide GV1001: a phase II trial (CTN-2006) in patients vaccinated after chemoradiotherapy and an 8-year update on a previously reported phase I/II trial (CTN-2000).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

CTN-2006: 23 inoperable stage III patients received radiotherapy (2 Gy × 30) and weekly docetaxel (20 mg/m(2)), followed by GV1001 vaccination. CTN-2000: 26 patients were vaccinated with two telomerase peptides (GV1001 and I540). The immune responses were evaluated by T-cell proliferation and cytokine assays.

RESULTS

CTN-2006 trial: a GV1001-specific immune response developed in 16/20 evaluable patients. Long-term immunomonitoring showed persisting responses in 13 subjects. Serious adverse events were not observed. Immune responders recorded a median PFS of 371 days, compared with 182 days for nonresponders (P = 0.20). CTN-2000 trial update: 13/24 evaluable subjects developed a GV1001 response. The immune responders achieved increased survival compared with nonresponders (median 19 months vs. 3.5 months; P < 0.001). Follow-up of four long-time survivors showed that they all harbored durable GV1001-specific T-cell memory responses and IFNγ(high)/IL-10(low)/IL-4(low) cytokine profiles. Two patients are free of disease after 108 and 93 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination with GV1001 is well tolerated, immunizes the majority of NSCLC patients and establishes durable T-cell memory. The considerable immune response rate and low toxicity in the phase II trial support the concept of combining chemoradiotherapy with vaccination. The survival advantage observed for immune responders warrants a randomized trial.

First-in-human study of a novel nucleoside analogue, CP-4126, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2577

Background: CP-4126 (gemcitabine 5'-elaidic acid ester) is a novel nucleoside analogue with proven preclinical antitumor activity. Unlike gemcitabine, the intracellular uptake of CP-4126 is independent of nucleoside transporters. The aims of this study were to determine the safety, toxicity, MTD and the RD of CP-4126, to describe its pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics, and to assess its preliminary antitumor activity. Methods: Patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors, performance status ECOG < 2, with adequate haematologic, renal and hepatic function were enrolled in this dose escalation study (1–6 pts per dose level (DL)). CP-4126 was administered on days (d) 1, 8 and 15 every 4 week by a 30 min IV infusion. Start dose was 30 mg/m2/d and the dose was increased by 100% until toxicity > CTCAE grade 2 occurred. Standard DLT definitions were used. Activity was assessed at the end of every 2nd cycle (cy). Plasma and urine PK were determined during d1 (24 hrs) of cy1; plasma at all DLs and urine at DL= 1400 mg/m2/d. Results: 39 pts have been included, (m =24; f =15 ), median age 60 (range 19–78), receiving 96 cycles (range 1–9) of treatment, with 1 pt/DL from 30 to 240 mg/m2/d. The first grade 2 AE (neutropenia) was reported at 480 mg/m2/d. Most frequent toxicities include nausea, vomiting, fatigue and anorexia, the majority of mild severity (grade 1–2). 5 DLTs have been reported; 800 mg/m2/d (1 pt - d8 dose delay >2 weeks due to grade 3 thrombocytopenia and anaemia); 1000 mg/m2/d (1 pt died 48 hrs after treatment start due to acute lung damage); 1400 mg/m2/d (1 pt - fatigue grade 3); 2 pts at 1600 mg/m2/d (grade 3 ALT/AST elevation [1 pt]; 1 pt grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 fatigue). Stabilisation of disease (≥ 3 months) reported in 5 pts (pancreas, colon and ovarian cancer) lasting between 3.5 to 8 months. One ovarian pt had a 28.3% reduction in tumor mass. CP-4126 was detected in plasma up to 24 hrs post-dosing. AUC for dFdC exposure was significantly higher than reported with gemcitabine at comparable dose levels. Urinary excretion of the main metabolite dFdU during the first 24 hrs was approximately 60% of dose. Conclusions: CP-4126 is well tolerated and accrual is ongoing at 1400 mg/m2/d to establish RD for phase II studies. Updated results including plasma and urine PK will be presented.

[Table: see text]