Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of oesophageal cancer patients in Uganda

Background

Oesophageal cancer is the seventh most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and its incidence varies globally. In Uganda, the incidence and trend are on the increase. However, there is a paucity of published data regarding this population's oesophageal cancer clinicopathologic characterisation and treatment outcomes.

Objectives

To study the patients' clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes of oesophageal cancer over 10 years at the Uganda Cancer Institute.

Methods

Patients' charts with histologically confirmed diagnoses of oesophageal cancer for 2009-2019 were identified. Case information, which included patient demographics, history of alcohol use or smoking, tumour location, histological type, tumour grade, clinical TNM (Tumour, Node, Metastasis) staging treatment exposure and treatment outcomes, was evaluated retrospectively. The median survival time was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and the median follow-up period was estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier.

Results

1,965 oesophageal cancer patients were identified; 1,380(70.23%) were males and 585(29.77 %) females, their mean age was 60.20 years (±12.66). Most males had a history of both alcohol consumption and smoking 640(46.38%). The lower third of the oesophagus was the most common anatomical location 771(39.24%). The majority had squamous cell carcinoma histological type 1,783(90.74%) followed by adenocarcinomas 182(9.26%) in the distal oesophagus. Poorly differentiated tumour grade 743(37.81%) was predominant. The majority of the patients were in stage IVB, 733(37.30%), and most patients were planned for the best supportive care, 731(37.20%). Radiation alone was offered to 621(31.60%) and feeding gastrostomy to 249(12.70%). Treatment outcomes: at the time of the current analysis, 58.68% had died, 1.48% were alive and 39.84% were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up period was 65 months (IQR:35.83-83.30) with a median survival time of 4.47 months (95% CI: 4.17-4.80).

Conclusion

Treatment outcomes of Ugandan oesophageal cancer patients seeking care are poor as most patients present with advanced disease. There is a significant loss of follow-up after treatment initiation. Therefore, reduction in exposure to known modifiable risk factors, early detection and timely referral for treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes of these patients in our population. Designing interventions to improve treatment adherence is necessary.

Operational Metrics for the ELAINE 2 Study Combining a Traditional Approach With a Just-in-TIME Model

PURPOSE

There are numerous barriers to enrollment in oncology biomarker-driven studies.

METHODS

The ELAINE 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04432454) is an open-label phase 2 study of lasofoxifene combined with abemaciclib in patients with advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation. ELAINE 2 opened clinical sites by using a Traditional approach, which activated a site before patient identification, and the Tempus TIME Trial network, which opened a site only after identifying an eligible patient. This manuscript presents the operational metrics comparing the Traditional and TIME Trial site data.

RESULTS

The study enrolled patients over 34 weeks and 16 sites (six Traditional and 10 TIME Trial) participated. Duration for full clinical trial agreement execution for Traditional sites and TIME Trial sites averaged 200.5 (range, 142-257) and 7.6 days (range, 2-14), respectively. Institutional review board approval time for Traditional sites and TIME Trial sites was 27.5 (range, 12-71) and 3.0 days (range, 1-12), respectively. Duration from study activation to first consent was 33.3 (range, 18-58) and 8.8 days (range, 1-35) for Traditional and TIME Trial sites, respectively. The first patient on study was at a TIME Trial site 115 days before a Traditional site and the first seven patients enrolled were at TIME Trial sites. Traditional sites consented 23 and enrolled 16 patients, while TIME Trial sites consented 16 and enrolled 13. The trial enrolled 29 patients in 8.5 months with the anticipated enrollment duration being 12-18 months.

CONCLUSION

The TIME Trial network opened earlier and enrolled the first study patients. These results demonstrate that the Just-in-TIME model, along with a Traditional model, can improve enrollment in biomarker-driven studies.

Operational metrics for the ELAINE II study combining a traditional approach with a just-in-time model

1504

Background: Trial recruitment that requires specific actionable mutations based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) is challenging. Barriers can include competing studies, physician study awareness, site proximity, mutation incidence, among other concerns. Methods: This study (NCT04432454) opened clinical sites using two methods during the COVID-19 pandemic. The “Traditional” approach included site selection, IRB and contract approval, and trial activation prior to a patient being identified for enrollment. The second approach used the Tempus “TIME” Trials network that would only open a site after identifying a patient with a mutation of interest and eligible for the trial. Results: The first patient enrolled was on 10/12/20 and the last patient was on 6/24/21. A total of 16 sites (6 Traditional and 10 TIME) participated. All Traditional sites, and none of the TIME sites, were affiliated with major academic institutions. Duration for full CTA execution for Traditional sites averaged 200.5 days (range 142 to 257) and for TIME sites averaged 7.6 days (range 2 to 14). IRB approval time average for Traditional sites was 27.5 days (range 12 to 71) and TIME sites was 3.0 days (range 1 to 12 days). Days from site selection to activation letter for Traditional sites was on average 250.0 days (range 187 to 281) and for TIME sites was 131.6 days (range 22 to 248). Time from study activation to first consent was 33.3 days (range 18 to 58) for Traditional sites and 8.8 days (range 1 to 35) for TIME sites. The first patient on-study was at a TIME site 115 days prior to a Traditional site and the first 7 patients enrolled were at TIME sites. Traditional sites consented 23 and enrolled 16 patients while the TIME sites consented 16 and enrolled 13. The trial enrolled all 29 patients in 8 months with the anticipated enrollment duration being 12 to 18 months. Conclusions: Although the Traditional and TIME programs had different operational models, they both contributed a significant number of patients and reduced the projected enrollment timeline. TIME sites enrolled the initial patients. These results demonstrate that the “Just-in-Time model,” in conjunction with a Traditional model, can reduce projected overall time to enrollment in biomarker-driven studies. [Table: see text]

Eight-year survival rates by baseline prognostic groups in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): An analysis from the ECOG-ACRIN 3805 (CHAARTED) trial

5081

Background: To date there is no prospective survival data beyond 5 years for patients treated with ADT with or without docetaxel (D) when analyzed by well-defined baseline prognostic risk groups and treatment arms. In this updated analysis of the CHAARTED trial, we report the 8-year survival rate based on disease volume and metachronous vs. de novo metastatic disease status with ADT without or with docetaxel. Methods: An updated survival sweep was conducted in February 2022. Patients were prospectively identified by the state of metastatic disease as metachronous (prior local therapy) vs. de novo and low volume (LV) vs. high volume (HV; visceral and/or ≥4 bone metastases with one lesion beyond the vertebral bodies or pelvis) disease. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from randomization to death or date last known alive and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of the 790 patients randomized (last patient enrolled December 2012), 238 patients were still alive with a median follow up of 9.7 years for patients still alive. Median OS in the overall population was 60.4 and 47.2 mos in the ADT+ D and ADT arms respectively (Table; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.92; p=0.004). ADT+ D was associated with significantly higher 8-yr OS rate (28.5%) compared to ADT arm (15.4%; HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.84; p=0.0005) in the de novo HV group (n=421). Notably, the 8-yr OS rates were almost doubled for patients with HV disease with early docetaxel (16% vs.30.2%, p<.0001) and this was seen in patients with both de novo and metachronous HV mHSPC. Conclusions: In this long-term updated analysis, ADT+D continued to demonstrate significantly improved OS in the overall population and this is still most clearly evident in patients with de novo HV mHSPC. Our findings highlight the role of baseline prognostic risk groups in predicting longer term survival and benefits from treatment intensification. Clinical trial information: NCT00309985. [Table: see text]

Leveraging machine learning technology to efficiently identify and match patients for precision oncology clinical trials

e13588

Background: Pre-screening for clinical trials is becoming more challenging as inclusion/exclusion criteria becomes increasingly complex. Oncology precision medicine provides an exciting opportunity to simplify this process and quickly match patients with trials by leveraging machine learning technology. The Tempus TIME Trial site network matches patients to relevant, open, and recruiting clinical trials, personalized to each patient’s clinical and molecular biology. Methods: Tempus screens patients at sites within the TIME Trial Network to find high-fidelity matches to clinical trials. The patient records include documentation submitted alongside NGS orders as well as electronic medical records (EMR) ingested through EMR Integrations. While Tempus-sequenced patients were automatically matched to trials using a Tempus-built matching application, EMR records were run through a natural language processing (NLP) data abstraction model to identify patients with an actionable gene of interest. Structured data were analyzed to filter to patients that lack a deceased date and have an encounter date within a predefined time period. Tempus abstractors manually validated the resulting unstructured records to ensure each patient was matched to a TIME Trial at a site capable of running the trial. For all high-level patient matches, a Tempus Clinical Navigator manually evaluated other clinical criteria to confirm trial matches and communicated with the site about trial options. Results: Patient matching was accelerated by implementing NLP gene and report detection (which isolated 17% of records) and manual screening. As a result, Tempus facilitated screening of over 190,000 patients efficiently using proprietary NLP technology to match 332 patients to 21 unique interventional clinical trials since program launch. Tempus continues to optimize its NLP models to increase high-fidelity trial matching at scale. Conclusions: The TIME Trial Network is an evolving, dynamic program that efficiently matches patients with clinical trial sites using both EMR and Tempus sequencing data. Here, we show how machine learning technology can be utilized to efficiently identify and recruit patients to clinical trials, thereby personalizing trial enrollment for each patient.[Table: see text]

The TIME Trial Network to facilitate rapid clinical trial activation, patient screening, and enrollment in molecularly targeted trials

1563

Background: Clinical trials that require patients to have specific actionable mutations based on next generation sequencing (NGS) present unique problems, such as recruiting patients with rare mutations, low enrollment rates, and distance between patients and trial sites. Such barriers can slow the pace of trial enrollment and delay the development of new therapeutic options. Methods: Tempus Labs has partnered with experienced research sites and pharmaceutical companies with molecularly targeted clinical trials to create the TIME Trial Network. The study portfolio includes pharmaceutical sponsored phase I-III clinical trials across solid tumors and hematological malignancies, targeting actionable mutations. This network was established to ensure rapid just-in-time (JIT) activation of trials by streamlining start-up activities (i.e., execution of CTAs and study budgets/financial exhibits, regulatory paperwork, SIV planning and conduct, drug and study supply shipments, submission to the central IRB, and sponsor-specific requirements). Rapid activation begins upon receipt of an activation form from a site partner. “Site Activated” describes a site that has fulfilled all regulatory, documentation, contracting requirements, and has sponsor approval to screen and enroll patients. Results: In Q4 2020, JIT activations were completed for 6 unique interventional clinical trials across 10 sites in 8 US states in the TIME Trial Network. On average, sites were activated in 9.4 business days. Patients enrolled had rare NGS mutations and were from geographically diverse locations. In one urgent case, trial activation, patient consent, screening, and treatment were achieved in 5 business days. In total, 91.7% of patients consented to trial. The average timeline from activation to consent was 4.5 days (range 0 - 24 days), with half of patients consenting within 1 business day. 45.5% of patients who consented to trial received the study drug within 1 day of consent; 2 patients dosed on day of consent. Conclusions: Over a 3-month period, on average, TIME Trial sites were activated in 9.4 days (compared to the 20+ week industry-wide average), and patient consent was completed in 4.5 days. Rapid JIT activations through the TIME program provide significant improvements in trial enrollment timelines and increase access to therapies nationwide. JIT activations may be especially useful for rural, underserved communities, as sites can enroll diverse patient populations and help address the equity gap in clinical trials across ethnic groups.[Table: see text]

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma at the Uganda Cancer Institute

PURPOSE

Data on multiple myeloma (MM) in sub-Sahara Africa is scarce. In Uganda, there is a progressively increasing incidence of MM over the years.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 217 patients with MM at the UCI using purposive sampling method. The objectives of the study were to determine the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, 5 year overall survival and predictors of survival of patients with MM at the UCI from 01 January 2008 to 31 December 2012.

RESULTS

There were 119 (54.8%) males; the mean(SD) age of the study population at presentation was 59(12.8) years; 183(84.3%) patients presented with bone pain, and 135 (61.9%) had skeletal pathology; 186(85.3%) were HIV negative, and 152(70%) had Durie-Salmon stage III. The median overall survival was 2.5 years, (95% CI, 0.393-0.595); factors significantly associated with worse survival were Durie-Salmon stage III disease, HR=5.9, 95% CI (1.61 - 21.74; P=0.007) and LDH >225 U/L HR=3.3, 95% CI (0.57 - 5.92; P=0.029).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with multiple myeloma at the UCI were diagnosed at a relatively young age, presented with late stage disease and bone pain, and had a shorter survival time. Factors associated with worse survival were Durie-Salmon stage III and LDH >225 U/L.

Pilot study for the use of wearable devices for patients undergoing oral chemotherapy

e14103

Background: The rapid development of digital technology holds enormous potential to transform the delivery of cancer care. Despite these digital innovations, we still face significant challenges in healthcare in using these emerging digital technologies in the clinical setting. Clinicians generally underestimate the severity and extent of chemotherapy toxicity of patients. This project seeks to conduct an exploratory field study to collect patient feedback on their experiences, and the design/functionality of the prototype of the digital health service platform designed to monitor their symptoms. Methods: Using the National Cancer Institute item library addressing the most common symptoms for chemotherapy toxicity, a digital health platform was designed by Samsung Research America (SRA) and University Hospitals. Patients age ≥ 18 years old, willingness to agree to the consent document, ability to understand use of wearable device and willingness to answer patient reported outcomes questions were included in this study. Patients who are not undergoing oral chemotherapy treatment for their cancer were excluded. Patients were given a phone that had our designed platform along with a watch. The watch had the capability of tracking blood pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry. Patients were set up with an electronic account that queried them on patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) regarding potential toxicity they may be experiencing. They were also able to track medication consumption and input their weight. Subjects were be asked to use the wearable device and phone for at least 28 days and no more than 90 days. At the end of the study, a phone survey was attempted. Results: Total patients enrolled: 21. 18/21 (85.7%) patients completed the 90 days of the study. Only 9 patients provided PRO with total number of side effects reported 28 times. Watch device was only utilized by 15/21 (71.4%) patients. On an average across 90 days, these patients wore the watch 430 minutes per day. At the end of the treatment, 5 patients agreed to participate in the phone survey. Three patients stated that they would do similar study in the future noting that the digital platform helped them stay on track and monitor symptoms accurately. Every patient questioned had a complaint regarding the watch functionality. Patients also found it difficult to carry a second phone in addition to their personal phone. Conclusions: Improving our digital health service platform will get us closer to achieving effective bi-lateral patient communication and ultimately improving patient care.

Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial

Purpose Docetaxel added to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly increases the longevity of some patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Herein, we present the outcomes of the CHAARTED (Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer) trial with more mature follow-up and focus on tumor volume. Patients and Methods In this phase III study, 790 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were equally randomly assigned to receive either ADT in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 for up to six cycles or ADT alone. The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS). Additional analyses of the prospectively defined low- and high-volume disease subgroups were performed. High-volume disease was defined as presence of visceral metastases and/or ≥ four bone metastases with at least one outside of the vertebral column and pelvis. Results At a median follow-up of 53.7 months, the median OS was 57.6 months for the chemohormonal therapy arm versus 47.2 months for ADT alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; P = .0018). For patients with high-volume disease (n = 513), the median OS was 51.2 months with chemohormonal therapy versus 34.4 months with ADT alone (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.79; P < .001). For those with low-volume disease (n = 277), no OS benefit was observed (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.55; P = .86). Conclusion The clinical benefit from chemohormonal therapy in prolonging OS was confirmed for patients with high-volume disease; however, for patients with low-volume disease, no OS benefit was discerned.

Outcomes in bone predominant (BP) urothelial carcinoma (UC)

441

Background: The clinical phenotype of BP UC includes those patients (pts) with at least as many or more bone lesions than non-bone lesions. UC molecular subtypes that may correlate with prognosis have been defined. Better understanding of the clinical BP phenotype, which might correspond to the p53-like molecular subtype, is needed. Methods: We searched our biorepository to identify pts with metastatic UC. Electronic records of identified pts were reviewed and those with accessible records who received treatment at our institution were selected. Demographic, pathologic, treatment, response, progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) data were recorded. Imaging was reviewed to identify non-bone predominant (NBP) or BP disease based on imaging criteria. Results: 23 NBP and 9 BP pts, (59% men) were identified. Of BP pts, 44% had bone metastatic disease present at diagnosis (dx) vs. none of the NBP. Only 8% of NBP pts developed bone metastases during their course. The median number of lines of therapy in the metastatic setting was 2 for each cohort. All BP pts received platinum therapy vs. 74% of NBP. 11% of BP pts were treated with checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) vs. 34% of NBP. 70% of BP pts received palliative radiation (all to bone) vs. 4% of the NBP cohort. The median OS from date of UC dx was 27.5 months. There was a significant difference in OS between BP and NBP cohorts from UC dx date (16.9 vs. 30.6 months, p < 0.0001) as well as from muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) dx date (15.2 vs. 22.8 months, p = 0.019), respectively. OS from initiation of 1st line treatment in the metastatic setting for the entire cohort was 12.5 months and was not significantly different between the cohorts (p = 0.633). PFS from dx of MIBC to date of 1st progression or death was not significant (p = 0.08) with median PFS of 8.4 vs. 13.6 months for BP vs. NBP cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: BP pts require more frequent palliative radiation and have shorter OS measured from time of dx, but not significantly different when measured from the initiation of 1st line treatment, compared to NBP pts. Further analysis with a larger cohort is ongoing for validation. Molecular analysis on pathological specimens is planned.

Impact of metformin on prostate cancer (PC) outcomes in the E3805 CHAARTED trial

181

Background: To evaluate whether metformin (Met) a widely-used, nontoxic oral antidiabetic drug with putative anticancer properties leads to improvements in prostate cancer (PC) outcomes in the CHAARTED trial. Methods: In the CHAARTED database where metformin use at baseline was recorded prospectively, we identified patients with metastatic PC who underwent either ADT alone or ADT and docetaxel (D) chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the effect of Metformin on outcomes. Results: A total of 788 patients (median age, 63 y) had complete data after randomization. Comparison of ADT+D+Met (n = 39) to ADT+D (n = 357) and ADT+Met (n = 29) to ADT alone (n = 363) revealed similar clinicopathologic characteristics. Cause of death was PC in 13(81%) of ADT+D+Met, 72(85%) ADT+D, 9(82%) ADT+Met and 105(84%) ADT alone groups. See table for PC outcomes and overall survival by metformin use. Cox regression analysis for overall survival stratified by stratification factors at randomization demonstrates Met use was associated with a trend for worse overall survival (HR 1.47 95%CI: [0.95,2.26], p = 0.08) with adjustment for treatment arm and prior local therapy. In contrast, ADT+D use (HR 0.62; 95%CI: [0.47,0.81]) and prior local therapy with surgery or radiation (HR 0.56; 95% CI: [0.38, 0.82]) were associated with improved survival. Conclusions: In this study, baseline metformin did not improve PC outcomes. Partial support and drug supply by Sanofi. Clinical trial information: NCT00309985. [Table: see text]

Lower PSA at 7 months is prognostic for improved overall survival (OS) in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with ADT with and without docetaxel (D)

137

Background: Prior work from SWOG 9346 revealed that PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/dL at 7 months (mo) is prognostic for longer OS with ADT alone. We sought to evaluate if this optimal decline remained predictive of better OS when D was added to ADT for initial mHSPC treatment. Methods: We performed a landmark survival analysis at 7 mo using the E3805 database (NCT00309985). Inclusion required at least 7 mo of followup and PSA levels at 7 mo from ADT initiation. Survival was defined from ADT start or randomization to death. SWOG 9346 PSA nadirs of ≤ 0.2, > 0.2-4 and > 4 were used as classifiers. Results: 719 patients were eligible for analysis: 358 treated with ADT plus D and 361 with ADT alone. Median follow-up was 23.1 mo. On multivariable analysis (MVA), achieving a PSA ≤ 0.2 at 7 mo was more likely if the patient received D and had lower volume disease, prior local therapy, and lower baseline PSAs (all p ≤ 0.01). Across all patients, median OS was significantly longer if PSA at 7 mo reached ≤ 0.2 compared to > 4 (p < 0.0001) (Table). On MVA, PSA ≤ 0.2 at 7 mo and low volume disease were prognostic of longer OS (all p < 0.01). On ADT, 28.8% achieved a PSA ≤ 0.2 at 7 mo vs. 45.3% on ADT+D. Patients on ADT alone who achieved a PSA nadir ≤ 0.2 had the best survival. These patients were more likely to have low volume disease (56.7%) compared to the ADT + D pts (46.3%). Conclusions: Achieving PSA ≤ 0.2 at 7 mo remains prognostic for longer OS with ADT for mHSPC, whether administered alone or with D. Adding D to ADT increased the likelihood of a lower PSA and improved survival. Partial support and drug supply by Sanofi. Clinical trial information: NCT00309985. [Table: see text]

Olaratumab and doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone for treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma: an open-label phase 1b and randomised phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment with doxorubicin is a present standard of care for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and median overall survival for those treated is 12-16 months, but few, if any, novel treatments or chemotherapy combinations have been able to improve these poor outcomes. Olaratumab is a human antiplatelet-derived growth factor receptor α monoclonal antibody that has antitumour activity in human sarcoma xenografts. We aimed to assess the efficacy of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in patients with advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

We did an open-label phase 1b and randomised phase 2 study of doxorubicin plus olaratumab treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma at 16 clinical sites in the USA. For both the phase 1b and phase 2 parts of the study, eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma not previously treated with an anthracycline, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and available tumour tissue to determine PDGFRα expression by immunohistochemistry. In the phase 2 part of the study, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either olaratumab (15 mg/kg) intravenously on day 1 and day 8 plus doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) or doxorubicin alone (75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to eight cycles. Randomisation was dynamic and used the minimisation randomisation technique. The phase 1b primary endpoint was safety and the phase 2 primary endpoint was progression-free survival using a two-sided α level of 0.2 and statistical power of 0.8. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01185964.

FINDINGS

15 patients were enrolled and treated with olaratumab plus doxorubicin in the phase 1b study, and 133 patients were randomised (66 to olaratumab plus doxorubicin; 67 to doxorubicin alone) in the phase 2 trial, 129 (97%) of whom received at least one dose of study treatment (64 received olaratumab plus doxorubicin, 65 received doxorubicin). Median progression-free survival in phase 2 was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.1-8.3) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 4.1 months (2.8-5.4) with doxorubicin (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 0.44-1.02, p=0.0615). Median overall survival was 26.5 months (20.9-31.7) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 14.7 months (9.2-17.1) with doxorubicin (stratified HR 0.46, 0.30-0.71, p=0.0003). The objective response rate was 18.2% (9.8-29.6) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 11.9% (5.3-22.2) with doxorubicin (p=0.3421). Steady state olaratumab serum concentrations were reached during cycle 3 with mean maximum and trough concentrations ranging from 419 μg/mL (geometric coefficient of variation in percentage [CV%] 26.2) to 487 μg/mL (CV% 33.0) and from 123 μg/mL (CV% 31.2) to 156 μg/mL (CV% 38.0), respectively. Adverse events that were more frequent with olaratumab plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone included neutropenia (37 [58%] vs 23 [35%]), mucositis (34 [53%] vs 23 [35%]), nausea (47 [73%] vs 34 [52%]), vomiting (29 [45%] vs 12 [18%]), and diarrhoea (22 [34%] vs 15 [23%]). Febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was similar in both groups (olaratumab plus doxorubicin: eight [13%] of 64 patients vs doxorubicin: nine [14%] of 65 patients).

INTERPRETATION

This study of olaratumab with doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma met its predefined primary endpoint for progression-free survival and achieved a highly significant improvement of 11.8 months in median overall survival, suggesting a potential shift in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

Prostate Cancer Burden at the Uganda Cancer Institute

Purpose

In Uganda, the incidence of prostate cancer is increasing at a rate of 5.2% annually. Data describing presentation and outcomes for patients with prostate cancer are lacking.

Methods

A retrospective review of medical records for men with histologically confirmed prostate cancer at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI) from January 1 to December 17, 2012, was performed.

Results

Our sample included 182 men whose mean age was 69.5 years (standard deviation, 9.0 years). Patients who presented to the UCI had lower urinary tract symptoms (73%; n = 131), bone pain (18%; n = 32), increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA; 3%; n = 5), and other symptoms (6%; n = 11). Median baseline PSA was 91.3 ng/mL (interquartile range, 19.5-311.3 ng/mL), and 51.1% of the patients (n = 92) had a PSA value above 100 ng/mL. Gleason score was 9 or 10 in 66.7% of the patients (n = 120). Ninety percent (n = 136) had stage IV disease, and metastatic sites included bone (73%; n = 102), viscera (21%; n = 29), and lymph nodes (4%; n = 5). Spinal cord compression occurred in 30.9% (n = 55), and 5.6% (n = 10) experienced a fracture. A total of 14.9% (n = 27) underwent prostatectomy, and 17.7% (n = 32) received radiotherapy. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was given to 45.3% (n = 82), 29.2% (n = 53) received diethylstilbestrol, and 26% (n = 47) underwent orchiectomy. Chemotherapy was administered to 21.6% (n = 39), and 52.5% (n = 95) received bisphosphonates. During the 12 months of study, 23.8% of the men (n = 43) died, and 54.4% (n = 98) were lost to follow-up.

Conclusion

UCI patients commonly present with high PSA, aggressive Gleason scores, and stage IV disease. The primary treatments are hormonal manipulation and chemotherapy. Almost 25% of patients succumb within a year of presentation, and a large number of patients are lost to follow-up.

Upper gastrointestinal diseases in patients for endoscopy in South-Western Uganda

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of published data regarding upper gastrointestinal diseases in Ugandans with upper gastrointestinal symptoms referred for endoscopy.

OBJECTIVES

To study the presenting complaints, pathology and Helicobacter pylori prevalence among patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms in South-Western Uganda.

METHODS

Patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal symptoms underwent upper endoscopy and a urease test for Helicobacter Pylori, all suspicious lesions were biopsied for histopathology review as appropriate.

RESULTS

The most common presenting complaints were epigastric pain (51.6%), dysphagia (13.6%) and odynophagia (7.1%). The most common endoscopy finding was gastritis (40.2%), followed by normal examination (15.2%), oesophageal cancer (13.6%), gastric ulcer (7.6%) and gastric cancer (7.1%). Patients older than 40 years (n=110) had significant findings including gastritis (50.9%), oesophageal cancer (22.7%) and gastric cancer (11.8%). However in younger patients, with the age range of 18-40 years (n=74), most examinations were normal (92.9%). Of the 176 patients able to undergo Helicobacter pylori testing 75.6% were positive. Helicobacter pylori infection was associated with statistically significant increase in gastritis, oesophageal cancer, gastric ulcer, gastric cancer, and duodenal ulcers (p-values< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Gastritis, ulcerative disease, and upper gastrointestinal malignancies are common in South-Western Ugandans and are associated with a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori.

National Trends of Local Ablative Therapy Among Young Patients With Small Renal Masses in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To assess national trends in the usage of local ablative therapy for small renal masses (SRMs) in a cohort of young patients. Ablation of SRMs has been shown to offer cancer control with limited follow-up. Although ablation is considered effective for patients with limited life expectancy, its use among younger patients may be considered controversial.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients between the ages of 40 and 65 years who were diagnosed with SRMs from 2004 to 2011. The primary outcome was the use of local ablative therapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with ablation therapies in this cohort.

RESULTS

During the study period, we identified 49,441 patients with SRMs, of which 2789 (5.6%) were treated with ablative therapies. The proportion of patients undergoing ablation gradually rose from 2.2% in 2004 to 6.2% in 2011 (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to receive local ablation at academic hospitals (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5; P < .001) compared with community hospitals, or primarily insured by Medicaid (OR: 1.4; P < .001) or Medicare (OR: 1.3; P < .001) compared with private insurance.

CONCLUSION

The use of local ablative therapies is gradually rising but has so far been limited to a small fraction of young patients with SRMs. Patients treated at high-volume, academic hospitals or insured with Medicaid or Medicare were treated to a greater degree with ablation. These results have important implications for the adoption of ablation and the need for long-term surveillance.

Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the backbone of treatment for metastatic prostate cancer since the 1940s. We assessed whether concomitant treatment with ADT plus docetaxel would result in longer overall survival than that with ADT alone.

METHODS

We assigned men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer to receive either ADT plus docetaxel (at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks for six cycles) or ADT alone. The primary objective was to test the hypothesis that the median overall survival would be 33.3% longer among patients receiving docetaxel added to ADT early during therapy than among patients receiving ADT alone.

RESULTS

A total of 790 patients (median age, 63 years) underwent randomization. After a median follow-up of 28.9 months, the median overall survival was 13.6 months longer with ADT plus docetaxel (combination therapy) than with ADT alone (57.6 months vs. 44.0 months; hazard ratio for death in the combination group, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median time to biochemical, symptomatic, or radiographic progression was 20.2 months in the combination group, as compared with 11.7 months in the ADT-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72; P<0.001). The rate of a prostate-specific antigen level of less than 0.2 ng per milliliter at 12 months was 27.7% in the combination group versus 16.8% in the ADT-alone group (P<0.001). In the combination group, the rate of grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia was 6.2%, the rate of grade 3 or 4 infection with neutropenia was 2.3%, and the rate of grade 3 sensory neuropathy and of grade 3 motor neuropathy was 0.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Six cycles of docetaxel at the beginning of ADT for metastatic prostate cancer resulted in significantly longer overall survival than that with ADT alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00309985.).

Prostate cancer burden at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI)

246

Background: In Uganda prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the incidence is increasing 5.2% annually. This burden is seen without screening programs in a country with limited access to cancer care. Data describing patient presentation and outcomes are lacking. Methods: Retrospective chart review for men with histologically-confirmed prostate cancer at the UCI from January 1 to December 17, 2012. Patient characteristics, treatments, and survival data were obtained. Results: There were 181 men with confirmed prostate cancer [C1] . Mean age was 69.5 (SD 9.0) with a median age of 70 (IQR: 64-75). Men presented with symptoms of lower urinary tract symptoms 73% (n=131), bone pain in 18% (n=32), elevated PSA 3% (n=5) and other causes 6% (n=11). Median baseline PSA was 91.3 ng/ml (IQR: 19.5-311.3 ng/ml) and upon presentation 51.1% (n=92) had a PSA value over 100 ng/ml. Gleason Score was 9 or 10 in 66.7% (n=120), Gleason Score 7 to 8 in 23.4% (n=44), and Gleason six or lower in 10% (n=18). Ninety percent (n=136) of patients had stage IV disease, 6.5% (n=11) were stage III, 11.9% were (n= 20) stage II, and 1 individual (0.6%) had stage I. Common sites of metastases included bone 73% (n=102), visceral metastases 21% (n=29), and lymph node involvement 4% (n=5). Spinal cord compression occurred in 30.9% (n=55) and 5.6% (n=10) experienced a fracture. A total of 14.9% (n=27) patients underwent radical prostatectomy and 17.7% (n=32) received radiotherapy. GNRH agonist was given to 45.3% (n=82) of patients, 29.2% (n=53) of men received diethylstilbestrol, and 26% (n=47) underwent bilateral orchiectomy. Chemotherapy was administered to 21.6% (n=39) and 52.5% (n=95) received bisphosphonates. During the 12 months of study 23.8% (n=43) of men experienced death and 54.4% (n=98) were lost to follow up. Conclusions: UCI patients present with significant symptoms, high PSA, and aggressive Gleason Scores. 90% present with stage IV disease and almost 33% develop spinal cord compression. Prostatectomy and radiotherapy are infrequently given and the primary treatments are hormonal manipulation and chemotherapy. Almost 25% of patients succumb within a year of presentation and there is a high rate of patients lost to follow up.

Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tivantinib in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

146

Background: Tivantinib is a putative non-ATP competitive inhibitor of c-MET receptor tyrosine kinase that has additional cytotoxic mechanisms including tubulin inhibition. Prostate cancer demonstrates higher c-MET expression as the disease progresses to more advanced stages and to castration resistance. Methods: 80 patients (pts) with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC were assigned (2:1) to either tivantinib 360 mg PO BID or placebo (P). The primary endpoint was progression free survival. PCWG2 guidelines were utilized for determining eligibility and progression. Results: Of the 80 pts enrolled, 78 (52 tivantinib, 26 P) received treatment and were evaluated. Median age was 67 yrs (range: 43 to 85). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms for ECOG PS, Gleason score, PSA, LDH, hemoglobin, Alk Phos, prior treatment, bone and organ involvement. More African Americans and those with lymph node involvement were randomly assigned to placebo. Median follow up is 8.2 months (range: 1.4 to 27.6). To date 59 patients have progressed. Patients treated with tivantinib had significantly better PFS vs. those treated with placebo (medians: 5.6 mo vs 3.8 mo, respectively; HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.89; p=0.015). Toxicity was mild overall. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was seen in 1 patient on tivantinib while grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were recorded in 1 patient each on tivantinib and placebo. Grade 3 sinus bradycardia was recorded in two men on the tivantinib arm. 8 deaths (3 P and 5 tivantinib) have been recorded and were all considered unrelated to therapy. Conclusions: Tivantinib significantly improved PFS in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC. Given the favorable toxicity profile and evidence of anti-tumor activity, investigation of tivantinib with other agents may be a rational strategy. Clinical trial information: NCT01519414.

Impact on overall survival (OS) with chemohormonal therapy versus hormonal therapy for hormone-sensitive newly metastatic prostate cancer (mPrCa): An ECOG-led phase III randomized trial

LBA2

Background: Docetaxel (D) improves OS of men with mPrCa who have progressed on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We aimed to assess the benefit of upfront chemohormonal therapy for metastatic PrCa. Methods: 1:1 randomization to ADT alone or ADT + D dosed 75mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles within 4 month (mos) of starting ADT. Stratification factors: high volume (HV) vs. low volume (LV) disease (HV: visceral metastases and/or 4 or more bone metastases); anti-androgen use beyond 30 days; Age ≥70 vs. < 70 years; ECOG PS 0-1 vs. 2; Prior adjuvant ADT > 12 vs. ≤ 12 mos; FDA approved drug for delaying skeletal related events. Key eligibility criteria: suitable organ and neurological function for D; adjuvant ADT ≤ 24 mos and no progression within 12 mos of adjuvant ADT. OS was the primary endpoint and the study was powered to assess for a 33.3% improvement in median OS (80% power and 1-sided alpha=2.5%). Projected median OS for ADT alone: HV-33 mos; LV-67 mos. Results: 790 men were accrued from 7/28/06 to 11/21/2012: ADT N=393; ADT + D: N=397; balanced for demographic, stratification and disease factors. Median age: 63 years (range: 36 to 91); 98% ECOG PS 0 or 1; 89% Caucasian; 24% prior radiotherapy, 24% prior prostatectomy; HV 64% on ADT and 67% on ADT + D. Data released after 4th interim analysis in Sept 2013 when O’Brien Fleming upper boundary was crossed with 53.1% information. This report reflects 1/16/2014 data with median follow-up of 29 mos with 137 deaths on ADT alone vs. 104 deaths on ADT+D. ADT+D: Grade (G) 3/4 Neutropenic fever: 4%/2%; G3 neuropathy: 1% sensory, 1% motor; 1 death due to treatment (no deaths due to treatment on ADT). Efficacy data is in the table below. After disease progression, 123 pts on ADT alone and 45 pts on ADT + D received docetaxel. Conclusions: ADT + D improves OS over ADT alone in men with HV mPrCa. Longer follow-up is needed for men with LV mPrCa. Clinical trial information: NCT00309985. [Table: see text]

Incidence of hypercoagulable events after image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

To identify retrospectively hypercoagulable events that occurred over time in patients who underwent image-guided percutaneous renal cryoablation and compare the incidence with a cohort of patients who underwent surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) during the same time period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic medical record database was queried for patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided renal mass cryoablation or PN between September 2006 and June 2012. Records were examined for thrombotic events during the year following the procedure in each group. Incidence rates, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and patient demographic variables were compared using the stratified log-rank test and t test for independent samples.

RESULTS

The study comprised 114 cryoablation cases. The cumulative incidence of thrombotic events after 1 year was 4.39%. The incidence per 100 person-years was 4.84. There were 105 PN cases. The cumulative incidence of thrombotic events after 1 year was 1.0%. The incidence per 100 person-years was 1.14. The person-time incidence rate difference for these two groups did not reach statistical significance (P = .0894).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of thrombotic events in patients who underwent percutaneous renal cryoablation in this study was not significantly different than a comparable cohort who underwent surgical PN during the same time period.

Inhibition of the IGF pathway in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Results from a phase II study of OSI-906 (linsitinib)

e16022

Background: AR ligand independent pathways are responsible for the development of CRPC. IGF-1R and its ligands (IGF-1/IGF-2) play a key role in regulating growth, resistance to apoptosis, and invasion in PCa. IGF-1R is overexpressed in PCa and mediates resistance to ADT. Linsitinib is a small molecule potent dual inhibitor of IGF-1R and insulin receptor TK activity. To determine the activity of linsitinib in men with CRPC a Simon two-stage phase II study was conducted. Methods: Men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic Met CRPC were eligible. ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function, and no prior chemotherapy for CRPC were required. Pts received linsitinib at 150mg orally twice daily on a 28-day cycle. Endpoints included PSA response at 12 wks, safety, RECIST-defined response, time to PSA progression, and OS. Correlative studies explored the impact of linsitinib on AR signaling (androstenedione, DHEA, DHEA-sulfate, p-IGF-1R, p-IR), markers of PD (TGF-b1, IL-6, TNF-a, MCP-1), and CTC and CECs. Results: Eighteen pts were enrolled and completed 12 wks of therapy. Median age 68 (55-78); Median pre-treatment PSA was 55.23 (range 2.46-277.60); 41% of pts had bone-only disease, 29% soft-tissue only and 29% had both. Although transient PSA declines were noted (8/18), seventeen pts discontinued therapy sec PSA progression. RECIST-defined SD was observed in 8 pts. Pts received a median of 3 cycles of therapy (range 2-6+). Most common G1/2 AEs included AST/ALT changes observed in 41 and 18% of patients respectively, fatigue (59%); prolonged QT interval (35%) and nausea/vomiting (35%). No significant change in the number of CTC and CEC counts was observed. An association between pre-treatment PSA and pre-treatment CTC was observed (Spearman r=0.49, p=.04). No correlation between CTC changes and PSA progression was observed .Evaluation of other molecular markers of PD is underway. Conclusions: Treatment with linsitinib is safe however no PCa activity was seen. No changes in CTC/CECs were noted. Markers of PD might help elucidate potential mechanisms of escape to this alternative pathway in CRPC. Linsitinib plus an AA might provide synergistic activity in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01533246.

A phase II study of linsitinib (OSI-906) in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic (non-opioid requiring) metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

197

Background: Novel agents capable of blocking AR ligand independent pathways responsible for the development of CRPC are needed. IGF-1R and its ligands (IGF-1/IGF-2) play a key role in regulating growth, resistance to apoptosis, and invasion in PCa. IGF-1R is overexpressed in PCa and mediates resistance to ADT. OSI-906 is a small molecule potent dual inhibitor of IGF-1R and insulin receptor TK activity. To determine the activity of OSI-906 in men with CRPC a Simon two-staged phase II study was conducted. Methods: Men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic Met CRPC were eligible. ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function, and no prior chemotherapy for CRPC were required. Pts received OSI-906 at 150mg orally twice daily on a 28-day cycle. Endpoints included PSA response at 12 wks, safety, RECIST-defined response, time to PSA progression, and OS. Correlative studies explored the impact of OSI-906 on AR signaling (androstenedione, DHEA, DHEA-sulfate, p-IGF-1R, p-IR), markers of PD (TGF-b1, IL-6, TNF-a, MCP-1), and CTC and CECs. Results: To date 18 pts have enrolled and completed 12 wks of therapy. Median age 68 (55-78); Median pre-treatment PSA was 55.23 (range 2.46-277.60); 41% of pts had bone-only disease, 29% soft-tissue only and 29% had both. Although transient PSA declines were noted, 17/18 pts discontinued therapy sec PSA progression. RECIST-defined SD was observed in 8 pts. Pts received a median of 3 cycles of therapy (range 2-6+). Most common G1/2 AEs included AST/ALT changes observed in 41 and 18% of patients respectively, fatigue (59%); prolong QT interval (35%) and nausea/vomiting (35%). No significant change in the number of CTC and CEC counts was observed. An association between pre-treatment PSA and pre-treatment CTC was observed (Spearman r=0.49, p=.04). No correlation between CTC changes and PSA progression was observed .Evaluation of other molecular markers of PD is underway. Conclusions: Treatment with OSI-906 is safe. No PSA responses or changes in CTC/CECs were noted. Markers of PD might help elucidate potential mechanisms of escape to this alternative pathway in CRPC. OSI-906 plus an AA might provide synergistic activity in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01533246.

Detection of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), a biomarker of prostate cancer, in patient blood samples using a nanoparticle electrochemical biosensor

41

Background: A promising prostate cancer biomarker, alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), has demonstrated the ability to distinguish cancer from healthy and benign cells with high sensitivity and specificity. However the lack of a good clinical assay has limited its translation into the clinic. Here we report on the development of a single use disposable biosensor for AMACR detection. Methods: This is a very inexpensive, small, single-use disposable sensor that requires only a drop of plasma and connects to a portable device. The biosensor utilizes the reaction of pristanic acid with a substrate that includes AMACR to produce Trans-2,3-dehydropritanayl-CoA plus H2O2. The biosensor utilizes iridium oxide nanoparticle catalyst to oxidize the H2O2 produced in the above metabolic pathway. Thus the oxidation of H2O2 yields a measurable current to quantify AMACR in the sample. This is the first in vitro assay method for AMACR based on this reaction mechanism. Results: In our study including plasma from 9 healthy males, 10 patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and 5 prostate cancer patients we show 100% accuracy in separating prostate cancer patients from controls as well as those with benign prostate conditions. Conclusions: Our data provides strong evidence for the ability of this biosensor to perform as a reliable assay for prostate cancer detection and diagnosis.

Phase I trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

Combining cytotoxic agents with bevacizumab has yielded significant benefits in a number of solid tumors. Combining small-molecule kinase inhibitors of VEGFR with chemotherapy has yet to demonstrate clinical benefit. The dose, schedule and agents used may be critical to the development of this combinatorial therapy.

METHODS

We performed a phase I trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies based on strong preclinical rationale.

RESULTS

Two different MTDs were determined. The schedule of gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 and sunitinib 25 mg daily was considered to be a MTD. However, omission of day 15 gemcitabine was common, and thus, a second MTD of gemcitabine of 675 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 with sunitinib 25 mg daily was determined to be the recommended phase II dose. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 33 and 6 %, respectively. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were uncommon. Four of 33 patients had a partial response. Another 11 patients had stable disease ranging from 3 to 36 months. Thus, the recommended phase II dose of this combination is gemcitabine 675 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 on an every 21-day schedule along with sunitinib 25 mg continuous daily.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination is well-tolerated and has significant clinical activity.

Targeting mTOR and VEGF in CRPC: Preliminary results of a phase I/II trial of temsirolimus (T) and bevacizumab (B) in docetaxel-refractory metastatic CRPC

e15208

Background: Despite the availability of novel agents in the docetaxel-refractory setting, their activity is often short lived as all pts eventually progress. Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR/VEGF/CXCR6 pathway regulates proliferation, differentiation, and malignant transformation in PCa progression. mTOR inhibition inhibits CXCL16, IL8/VEGF levels and other CXCR6 targets including CD44 and matrix metalloproteinase 3. Combination strategies capable of blocking the CXCR6/VEGF/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway could become a more effective therapeutic strategy for CRPC. Methods: Eligible docetaxel-refractory CRPC pts had serologic or objective PD after 1 or 2 prior chemotherapies. Pts with CNS metastases or active spinal cord compression were excluded. A staged-cohort design to study primarily safety of the combination was undertaken. Once the MTD was established a two-stage phase 2 trial was implemented. An underlying ORR >20% was deemed sufficient to warrant further study, whereas an ORR rate <5% would not. Starting doses of T and B were 15mg wk and 5mg/kg e/2 wk. Exploratory endpoints included CTCs, VEGF levels and Th1 cytokine production. Results: To date 22 of a total planned 28 pts are enrolled, median age was 64 and half of the pts were ECOG 1. Most pts had bone disease and the median PSA was 205 ng/mL. Pts have received a median of 4 cycles of treatment (range: 1-12). All pts have discontinued therapy; 48% PD, 38% AEs and 5% consent withdrawal. PSA reductions were observed in 30% of pts. No RECIST defined PR was seen. The most common AEs included anorexia (67%), mucositis (53%), fatigue (57%) and myelosuppression in over 60% of pts. CTC analysis and VEGF/TOR and cytokine levels are currently underway. Conclusions: The combination of T and B demonstrated significant toxicity in a heavily pretreated CRPC pt population. Minimal antitumor activity was observed. Exploratory studies and their correlation with clinical outcome are underway.

A phase Ib/II study evaluating the efficacy of doxorubicin (D) with or without a human anti-PDGFRα monoclonal antibody olaratumab (IMC-3G3) in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS)

TPS10099

Background: PDGFRα is a receptor commonly overexpressed in STS. Olaratumab is a fully human IgG1 MAb which specifically binds to human PDGFRα and blocks PDGFR-mediated signaling pathways. Olaratumab demonstrated significant tumor inhibition as a monotherapy and in combination with standard chemotherapy in preclinical human sarcoma xenograft models. A Phase 1b/2 clinical trial for patients with advanced or metastatic STS is currently enrolling patients in 9 sites across the United States; approximately 45 patients have been randomized. Methods: In Phase 1b, patients received olaratumab (15 mg/kg) via intravenous infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle and D (75 mg/m²) 1 hour after olaratumab on Day 1. Phase 1b was completed without encountering dose-limiting toxicities; enrollment into Phase 2 has begun. The primary endpoint of the Phase 2 portion is to compare progression-free survival in patients with advanced STS when treated with D plus olaratumab versus D alone. Planned enrollment goal for Phase 2 is 130 patients. Patients are required to be ≥ 18 years old with ECOG 0-2, have appropriate organ function and histologically confirmed, measurable, and advanced STS. There is no restriction on the number of prior therapies. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either D plus olaratumab (Arm A) at same dose/schedule as in Phase 1b or D alone (Arm B). All patients can receive dexrazoxane. Upon completion of 8 cycles, patients in Arm A continue with olaratumab monotherapy. Patients in Arm B who develop disease progression during or after treatment can subsequently receive olaratumab monotherapy. Patients are stratified to treatment arms according to PDGFRα expression (positive vs. negative), number of previous lines of treatment, sarcoma subtype, and ECOG performance status. Response assessment occurs every 6 weeks. Exploratory analyses include biomarkers of olaratumab pharmacodynamic activity including PDGF ligands, PDGFR downstream molecules, VEGF, and changes in vascularity of tumor specimens.

A phase II study of tandutinib (MLN518), a selective inhibitor of type III tyrosine receptor kinases, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Therapies which target VEGF and mTOR are now available for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but there is a continued need to develop agents for patients who become refractory to these initial agents. Tandutinib is a relatively selective inhibitor of type III tyrosine kinase receptor kinases with promising activity in some tumors. In this trial, 10 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma refractory to previous therapy with sunitinib or sorafenib (median age 61 years, 80% performance status 0, 60% intermediate MSKCC risk classification) received tandutinib 500 mg bid daily with RECIST-defined response as the primary endpoint and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. No patient had more than 2 cycles of therapy and 50% of patients only received 1 cycle with 70% of patients discontinuing for progressive disease and 30% for toxicity. Tandutinib was not well tolerated with dose reduction in 60% of patients due to adverse events. The most common grade 3 toxicity was fatigue (30%). Tandutinib had no clinical activity and due to the excessive toxicity should not be developed further in patients with sunitinib or sorafenib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

A phase I study of rebeccamycin analog in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors

Rebeccamycin analog (RA) is an antitumor antibiotic with both topoisomerase I and II inhibiting activity. Topoisomerase inhibitors have demonstrated synergy with platinum agents. We performed a phase I trial of combination RA with oxaliplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors. RA was administered as a 1-hour infusion daily on days 1-5 with oxaliplatin administered on day 5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. A total of 17 patients were enrolled. The MTD for RA was 80 mg/m(2)/d for five days along with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 5. Myelosuppression was a common occurrence but was mild except in one instance. Dose limiting toxicities included atrial fibrillation and hypophosphatemia. There was evidence of antitumor activity including 3 partial responses in patients with esophageal, gallbladder and hepato-cellular carcinoma; 5 additional patients had stable disease. Thus, the combination of RA and oxaliplatin is both tolerable and has evidence of clinical activity, but given the lack of significant activity for single agent RA across a variety of disease sites, it is unlikely to proceed to phase II development.

A phase I study of sunitinib plus bevacizumab in advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

Bevacizumab is an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor; sunitinib is an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and related receptors. The safety and maximum tolerated dose of sunitinib plus bevacizumab was assessed in this phase I trial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated on a 3+3 trial design. Patients received sunitinib daily (starting dose level, 25 mg) for 4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off and bevacizumab (starting dose level, 5 mg/kg) on days 1, 15, and 29 of a 42-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities during the first 6-week cycle were used to determine the maximum tolerated dose.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of treatment (range, 1-17(+)). There was one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 hypertension) at 37.5 mg sunitinib and 5 mg/kg bevacizumab. Grade 3 or greater toxicity was observed in 87% of patients including hypertension (47%), fatigue (24%), thrombocytopenia (18%), proteinuria (13%), and hand-foot syndrome (13%). Dose modifications and delays were common at higher dose levels. No clinical or laboratory evidence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia was observed. Seven patients had a confirmed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined partial response (18%; 95% confidence interval, 8-34%). Nineteen of the 32 patients with a postbaseline scan (59%) had at least some reduction in overall tumor burden (median, 32%; range, 3-73%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sunitinib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors is feasible, albeit with toxicity at higher dose levels and requiring dose modification with continued therapy. Antitumor activity was observed across multiple solid tumors.

Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or recurrent sarcomas

PURPOSE Since activity of sorafenib was observed in sarcoma patients in a phase I study, we performed a multicenter phase II study of daily oral sorafenib in patients with recurrent or metastatic sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS We employed a multiarm study design, each representing a sarcoma subtype with its own Simon optimal two-stage design. In each arm, 12 patients who received 0 to 1 prior lines of therapy were treated (0 to 3 for angiosarcoma and malignant peripheral-nerve sheath tumor). If at least one Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was observed, 25 further patients with that sarcoma subtype were accrued. Results Between October 2005 and November 2007, 145 patients were treated; 144 were eligible for toxicity and 122 for response. Median age was 55 years; female-male ratio was 1.8:1. The median number of cycles was 3. Five of 37 patients with angiosarcoma had a partial response (response rate, 14%). This was the only arm to meet the RECIST response rate primary end point. Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months; median overall survival was 14.3 months. Adverse events (typically dermatological) necessitated dose reduction for 61% of patients. Statistical modeling in this limited patient cohort indicated sorafenib toxicity was correlated inversely to patient height. There was no correlation between phosphorylated extracellular signal regulated kinase expression and response in six patients with angiosarcoma with paired pre- and post-therapy biopsies. CONCLUSION As a single agent, sorafenib has activity against angiosarcoma and minimal activity against other sarcomas. Further evaluation of sorafenib in these and possibly other sarcoma subtypes appears warranted, presumably in combination with cytotoxic or kinase-specific agents.

A phase II trial of fosbretabulin in advanced anaplastic thyroid carcinoma and correlation of baseline serum-soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 with outcome

BACKGROUND

Fosbretabulin is a novel vascular-disrupting agent that has antitumor activity against anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) cell lines, xenografts, and demonstrable efficacy in a phase I trial. This phase II study determined the efficacy and safety of fosbretabulin in patients with advanced ATC and whether fosbretabulin altered the natural history of ATC by virtue of doubling the median survival. A secondary aim evaluated the prognostic value of serum soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM).

METHODS

Twenty-six patients received fosbretabulin 45 mg/m(2) as a 10-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. sICAM levels were obtained at baseline, over the first two cycles, and end of therapy. Treatment was continued until disease progression.

RESULTS

Fosbretabulin was well tolerated; grade 3 toxicity was observed in nine patients (35%), and grade 4 toxicity in one (4%). QTc prolongation delayed treatment in four causing one to stop treatment. Median survival was 4.7 months with 34% and 23% alive at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Median duration of stable disease in seven patients was 12.3 months (range, 4.4-37.9 months). Baseline serum sICAM levels were measured in 24 patients with a median 253.5 ng/mL. There was a significant difference in event-free survival among tertiles of baseline sICAM levels (p < 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no objective responses seen with single-agent fosbretabulin as administered in this trial, and we did not observe a doubling of survival as our primary endpoint. This is among the largest prospective trials ever conducted for ATC. Fosbretabulin has an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced ATC, and one-third survived more than 6 months. Despite a small sample size, low baseline sICAM levels were predictive of event-free survival. Further prospective validation of sICAM as a therapeutic biomarker and exploring combination regimens with fosbretabulin are warranted.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the combination of weekly oxaliplatin x 4, weekly irinotecan x 4 and capecitabine Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle in patients with solid tumors; to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of these agents in this combination; to observe patients for clinical anti-tumor response.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with metastatic solid tumors received oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, irinotecan beginning at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, and capecitabine Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle, initially at 1,000 mg twice daily (bid).

RESULTS

The MTD was oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) weekly x 4 and capecitabine 450 mg bid Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle. One of six patients at this dose level developed DLT of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Among patients treated with a constant capecitabine dose of 450 mg bid, there was a higher mean AUC of 5-FU in women than in men (mean +/- SD: 892 +/- 287 nM h vs. 537 +/- 182 nM h; Mann-Whitney two-tailed, P = 0.02). There was one complete response in a patient with gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

The novel schedule of weekly oxaliplatin, weekly irinotecan, and capecitabine Monday through Friday, all administered for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle, evaluated in this phase I trial is well-tolerated and demonstrated activity in a patient with gastric cancer.

High-grade transitional cell carcinoma and melanosis of urinary bladder: case report and review of the literature

Melanosis of the urinary bladder is a rare entity. It is generally regarded as a benign condition, but it is sometimes associated with primary malignant melanoma of the urinary bladder. It has never been reported to be connected with transitional cell carcinoma. We present a case of a woman with melanosis of the bladder who a year later developed high grade transitional cell bladder carcinoma.

Phase I/II trial of 5-fluorouracil and a noncytotoxic dose level of suramin in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is recognized as a neoplasm resistant to chemotherapy. In vitro experiments demonstrated that suramin, at noncytotoxic doses, enhanced the activity of chemotherapy including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in xenograft models.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A phase I/II trial of noncytotoxic suramin in combination with weekly 5-FU in patients with metastatic RCC was conducted. The treatment consisted of intravenous (i.v.) suramin followed by a 500 mg/m2 i.v. bolus of 5-FU given 4.5 hours after starting suramin. In the phase I portion, a cohort of 6 patients received a suramin dose calculated to achieve a plasma level of 10-50 micromol/L. Therapy was administered once weekly for 6 doses, followed by 2 weeks off. This was followed by a phase II portion in which the primary goal was to determine the objective response rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study: 6 in the phase I portion and 17 in phase II. Seventy-eight percent of patients were men, the mean age was 58.8 years, 96% had previous nephrectomy, and 70% had received previous systemic therapy. Histologic subtype was clear cell in 91%. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 1 of 6 patients (grade 3 hypersensitivity related to suramin infusion). The suramin dosing nomogram used in phase I and II portions of the trial yielded the desired plasma level of 10-50 micromol/L from 4.5 hours to 48 hours after infusion in 94 of 115 treatments. No objective responses were noted, and the median time to treatment failure was 2.5 months. The major toxicities (all grades) were fatigue (83%), nausea/vomiting (78%), diarrhea (61%), and chills (61%).

CONCLUSION

Suramin levels expected to reverse fibroblast growth factor-induced resistance can be achieved with the dosing regimen used in this study. The toxicity observed with suramin and 5-FU was acceptable. The combination does not have clinical activity in patients with metastatic RCC.

Phase I trial of docetaxel and thalidomide: a regimen based on metronomic therapeutic principles

PURPOSE

Pre-clinical models have demonstrated the benefit of metronomic schedules of cytotoxic chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic compounds. This trial was undertaken to determine the toxicity of a low dose regimen using docetaxel and thalidomide.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. Thalidomide 100mg twice daily was given with escalating doses of docetaxel from 10 to 30 mg/m(2)/week. One cycle consisted of 12 consecutive weeks of therapy. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose of thalidomide along with docetaxel that caused < or =grade 1 non-hematologic or < or =grade 2 hematologic toxicity for cycle one.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were bradycardia, fatigue, fever, hyperbilirubinemia, leukopenia, myocardial infarction, and neutropenia. Prolonged freedom from disease progression was observed in 44.4% of the evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This anti-angiogenic regimen was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit. The recommended phase II dosing schedule is thalidomide 100 mg twice daily with docetaxel 25 mg/m(2)/week.

Phase 2 trial of pemetrexed disodium and gemcitabine in advanced urothelial cancer (E4802): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

There is a need to identify active new regimens in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. Pemetrexed and gemcitabine are active agents in advanced urothelial cancer. A phase 2 trial of the combination of these 2 agents was performed in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who were previously untreated for metastatic disease.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma received pemetrexed disodium 500 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously on Day 1, with gemcitabine repeated on Day 8. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Two patients attained a complete response, and 12 patients attained a partial response for an overall response rate of 31.8% (90% confidence interval, 20.4%-45.2%). The median time to disease progression was 5.8 months, and the median overall survival was 13.4 months. Thirty-three patients (75%) experienced grade>or=3 neutropenia, and 5 patients (11%) had febrile neutropenia. There were 2 therapy-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine had moderate antitumor activity in previously untreated patients with advanced urothelial cancer at the expense of significant myelosuppression.

Drug insight: vascular disrupting agents and angiogenesis--novel approaches for drug delivery

Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs), or endothelial disrupting agents, attempt to exploit the vascular endothelium that supplies rapidly dividing neoplasms. Unlike antiangiogenesis agents (e.g. the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab; and tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib) that disrupt endothelial cell survival mechanisms and the development of a new tumor blood supply, VDAs are designed to disrupt the already established abnormal vasculature that supports tumors, by targeting their dysmorphic endothelial cells. Tumor vascular endothelium is characterized by its increased permeability, abnormal morphology, disorganized vascular networks, and variable density. VDAs induce rapid shutdown of tumor blood supply, causing subsequent tumor death from hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. The safety profile of this class of compounds is more indicative of agents that are indeed 'vascularly' active. For example, VDAs can cause: acute coronary and other thrombophlebitic syndromes; alterations in blood pressure, heart rate, and ventricular conduction; transient flush and hot flashes; neuropathy; and tumor pain. Despite these cardiovascular concerns some patients have benefited from VDAs in early clinical trials. Further drug development of VDAs must include the combination of these agents with other novel biological agents, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Close monitoring of patients receiving VDAs for any cardiovascular toxicity is imperative.

Novel vascular targeting/disrupting agents: combretastatin A4 phosphate and related compounds

Novel anticancer compounds are being developed that attempt to exploit the unique properties of the vascular endothelium, which supplies rapidly dividing neoplasms. The goal of these vascular targeting agents (VTAs) or endothelial disrupting agents is to cause rapid shutdown of tumor blood supply with subsequent tumor death from hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. VTAs are classified into two broad categories: biologic therapies or small molecule compounds. A variety of VTAs are in early clinical development. These agents have demonstrated clinical activity in phase I trials and are being evaluated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Promising systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma

In the United States, advanced kidney cancer accounts for over 12,000 deaths each year. Immunotherapy with either interferon or interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been the standard of care for over two decades. High-dose IL-2 can apparently cure 10% to 15% of patients treated, but due to the required inpatient care and the attendant toxicities, it is only administered to less than 1,000 patients per year in the United States (Chiron, personal communication). Interferon is a less active agent than IL-2 but it has still been shown to be superior to therapy with either megesterol or vinblastine. Interferon typically results in very few long-term responses and is given to most patients with metastatic kidney cancer. Median survival after interferon therapy is dependent on risk group but is typically 12 to 15 months. Thus, new therapies are urgently needed in this refractory disease. Novel compounds currently being tested in clinical trials are showing promise in advanced kidney cancer. The molecular targets of these drugs include interfering with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors or the raf kinase pathway, angiogenesis inhibition, and antimicrotubule agents. A review of the preclinical and early clinical development of some of these novel compounds will be discussed.

A phase IB clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416 and paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

SU5416 is a novel small organic molecule that non-competitively inhibits the phosphorylation of the VEGF tyrosine kinase receptor, Flk-1. This phase IB study was performed to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of SU5416 and paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Enrolled in the study were 12 patients with biopsy-proven recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck. Six patients received intravenous SU5416 110 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, 18, 22 and 25, and paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 on days 8, 15 and 22. Since two patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cohort 1, the next six patients received identical treatment as above except the paclitaxel dose was reduced to 55 mg/m2 per week.

RESULTS

A total of 42 cycles at two different dose levels were given. In cohort 1 there were two deep venous thromboses that were DLTs. In the second cohort there was a DLT consisting of a transient ischemic attack after receiving SU5416. Most of the other toxicities seen were grade 1 or 2 in nature and consisted of headache, facial flushing, and fatigue. Two patients developed extensive ulcerative cavities at sites of prior radiation. There were no significant changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of SU5416 given with paclitaxel. Four patients had prolonged freedom from progression of 18, 28, 42, and 60 weeks duration.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of SU5416 with paclitaxel had a higher than expected incidence of thromboembolic events and prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for future trials that combine an angiogenesis inhibitor with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Although the future development of SU5416 as a chemotherapeutic agent is unclear, there was a clinical benefit seen with this combination in 36% of the patients. This trial supports the use of developing antiangiogenic combinations, using molecular targeted agents, in head and neck carcinoma.

Novel agents for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer

Advanced kidney cancer accounts for over 12,000 deaths in the United States each year. Immunotherapy, typically interleukin-2 or interferon-alpha, have been the mainstay of treatment. Response rates are low for these immune-based treatments, and most patients with advanced kidney cancer succumb to their disease. There are several novel agents currently in clinical trials that show promise in this refractory disease. These compounds include antiangiogenic agents, raf kinase pathway inhibitors, and novel antimicrotubule agents. This review discusses some of the agents currently being explored for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer.