TLD-1, a novel liposomal doxorubicin, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation and expansion part of a multicenter open-label phase I trial (SAKK 65/16)

BACKGROUND

TLD-1 is a novel liposomal doxorubicin that compared favorably to conventional doxorubicin liposomal formulations in preclinical models. This phase I first-in-human study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and preliminary activity of TLD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited patients with advanced solid tumors who failed standard therapy and received up to 3 prior lines of palliative systemic chemotherapy. TLD-1 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks up to a maximum of 9 cycles (6 for patients with prior anthracyclines) from a starting dose of 10 mg/m2, according to an accelerated titration design followed by a modified continual reassessment method.

RESULTS

30 patients were enrolled between November 2018 and May 2021. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed. Maximum administered dose of TLD-1 was 45 mg/m2, RP2D was defined at 40 mg/m2. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) of any grade included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (50% of patients), oral mucositis (50%), fatigue (30%) and skin rash (26.7%). Most common G3 TRAE included PPE in 4 patients (13.3%) and oral mucositis in 2 (6.7%). Overall objective response rate was 10% in the whole population and 23.1% among 13 patients with breast cancer; median time-to-treatment failure was 2.7 months. TLD-1 exhibit linear pharmacokinetics, with a median terminal half-life of 95 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The new liposomal doxorubicin formulation TLD-1 showed a favourable safety profile and antitumor activity, particularly in breast cancer. RP2D was defined at 40 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks. (NCT03387917).

Neratinib as Extended Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive/HR-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: Interim Results of the Prospective, Observational ELEANOR Study

Introduction

Prognosis of patients diagnosed with HER2+ early breast cancer (eBC) has substantially improved, but distant recurrences impacting quality of life and survival still occur. One treatment option for extended adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2+/HR+ eBC is neratinib, available in Europe for patients who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy within 1 year. The ELEANOR study is investigating the real-world use of neratinib in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Results from an interim analysis of the first 200 patients observed for ≥3 months are reported.

Methods

The primary objective of this prospective, multicenter, observational study is to assess patient adherence to neratinib (defined as the percentage of patients taking neratinib on ≥75% prescribed days). Secondary objectives are patient characteristics and treatment outcomes.

Results

At cut-off (May 2, 2022), a total of 202 patients had been observed for ≥3 months, with neratinib treatment documented for 187 patients (median age: 53.0 years; 67.9% at increased risk of disease recurrence). In total, 151 (80.7%) patients had received prior neoadjuvant treatment; of these, 82 (54.3%) patients achieved a pathologically complete response. Neratinib was initiated at a median 3.6 months after trastuzumab-based treatment, with 36.4% starting at a dose <240 mg/day. Treatment is ongoing for 46.0% of patients, with median treatment duration of 11.2 (interquartile range 0.9-12.0) months. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (78.6% any grade, 20.3% grade ≥3); pharmacologic prophylaxis was used in 85.6% of patients.

Conclusions

The pattern of anti-HER2 pretreatment observed reflected the current treatment for HER2+/HR+ eBC in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. These interim results suggest that neratinib as an extended adjuvant is a feasible option after various anti-HER2 pretreatments and that its tolerability can be managed and improved with proactive diarrhea management.

Abstract P2-01-01: Interim analysis (n=200) from ELEANOR: a multi-national, prospective, non-interventional study among patients with HER2+ and HR+ early breast cancer treated with extended adjuvant neratinib in the clinical routine

Background Recent advances in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (eBC) have led to a reduction in recurrence risk; still a relevant percentage of patients relapses over time, predominantly presenting with distant recurrence. Neratinib is registered in Europe as extended adjuvant treatment for adult patients with HER2+, hormone receptor positive (HR+) eBC, who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy within one year prior to start of neratinib. In the ExteNET study, neratinib improved the absolute 5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) rate by 5.1% versus placebo in this population (90.8% vs. 85.7%; HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.41-0.82]), mainly by reducing the rate of distant metastases. According to explorative analyses from ExteNET, the effect may be even more pronounced in patients with non-pCR after neoadjuvant trastuzumab treatment and/or in patients completing the full duration of neratinib therapy (i.e. ≥11 months of neratinib treatment). Diarrhea, the most common grade 3 adverse event (neratinib: 39% without primary diarrhea prophylaxis, median cumulative duration 5 days; placebo: 1%; no grade 4 events) can generally be managed through adequate prophylaxis and treatment management. ELEANOR is the first non-interventional study (NIS) of real-world use of neratinib and its management in eBC patients in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Methods Enrollment of 300 adult female patients with HER2+/HR+ eBC is planned in accordance with the SmPC specifications. Primary endpoint is the rate of patients adherent to neratinib treatment (i.e. neratinib use for ≥75% of treatment days). Secondary objectives include characterization of patients scheduled to receive neratinib, details on neratinib treatment, recurrences, safety/tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). CANKADO, an eHealth application developed to support patient/physician communication, is an integral part of the NIS. Here, we report results of the preplanned interim analysis based on 200 enrolled patients. Results At data cut-off (May 2022), 202 patients had been observed for 3 months; patient enrollment is ongoing. Median age was 53.0 years and 66.3% of patients were at increased risk of disease recurrence (defined as non-pCR or AJCC stage &gt; I). Most patients had received prior neoadjuvant treatment (79.7%). Post-neoadjuvant treatment included dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (38.8%/23.9% of pCR/non-pCR patients) and trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1, 53.5% of non-pCR patients). Neratinib treatment had been documented for 187 patients, treatment was ongoing for 46.0% of patients. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (78.6% any grade, 19.3% grade 3, 2 patients grade 4), but was markedly lower when indirectly compared to ExteNET (39% grade 3). The neratinib dose escalation schedule was chosen for 36.4% of patients and led to a decreased incidence of severe diarrhea (16.2% grade 3, no grade 4 events). 93.9% (95% CI: 87.9-97.5%) of 115 evaluable patients adhered to neratinib treatment. Conclusion The results of this preplanned interim analysis reflect the current treatment landscape in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. These results confirm, in line with the observed adherence data, that extended adjuvant neratinib use is feasible in typical clinical practice settings. Furthermore, treatment management strategies such as diarrhea prophylaxis or neratinib dose escalation are routinely used and can increase treatment tolerability markedly. The study is funded by Pierre Fabre Pharma GmbH (Freiburg, Germany), Pierre Fabre Pharma Austria (Wels, Austria) and Pierre Fabre Pharma AG (Allschwil, Switzerland).

Citation Format: Rupert Bartsch, Nadia Harbeck, Denise Wrobel, Matthias Zaiss, Jürgen Terhaag, Dagmar Guth, Andrea Distelrath, Rachel Wuerstlein, Mark-Oliver Zahn, Diana Lüftner, Michael Schwitter, Marija Balic, Christian Jackisch, Volkmar Müller, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Marcus Schmidt, Khalil Zaman, Timo Schinköthe, Anna Resch, Urs Breitenstein. Interim analysis (n=200) from ELEANOR: a multi-national, prospective, non-interventional study among patients with HER2+ and HR+ early breast cancer treated with extended adjuvant neratinib in the clinical routine [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-01.

Darolutamide Maintenance in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Nonprogressive Disease After Taxane Treatment (SAKK 08/16)

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of darolutamide maintenance after successful taxane chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) 08/16 is a randomized phase II study. Patients with mCRPC who received prior androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and subsequently had nonprogressive disease on a taxane were randomly assigned to darolutamide 600 mg twice a day or placebo twice a day. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were rPFS, event-free survival, overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 50% response rate, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Overall, 92 patients were recruited by 26 centers. Prior taxane was docetaxel in 93% and cabazitaxel in 7%. Prior ARPI was abiraterone in 60%, enzalutamide in 31%, and both in 9%. rPFS at 12 weeks was significantly improved with darolutamide (64.7% v 52.2%; P = .127). Median rPFS on darolutamide was 5.5 versus 4.5 months on placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.91; P = .017), and median event-free survival was 5.4 versus 2.9 months (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; P = .001). PSA 50% response rate was improved (22% v 4%; P = .014). Median OS for darolutamide was 24 versus 21.3 months for placebo (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.26; P = .181). Treatment-related adverse events were similar in both arms.

CONCLUSION

SAKK 08/16 met its primary end point, showing that switch maintenance with darolutamide after prior taxane chemotherapy and at least one ARPI resulted in a statistically significant but clinically modest rPFS prolongation with good tolerability. The median OS with darolutamide maintenance appears promising. Should these findings be confirmed in a larger trial, maintenance treatment could be a novel strategy in managing patients with mCRPC, especially those who responded well to prior ARPI.

Effect of an interprofessional small-group communication skills training incorporating critical incident approaches in an acute care and rehabilitation clinic specialized for spinal cord injury and disorder

AIM

To investigate the impact of site-specific inter-professional small-group communication skills training (CST) that incorporates critical incident approaches to learning on patient satisfaction with communication.

SETTING

Rehabilitation clinic specialized for spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D).

METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study design using patient and health-professional self-report data. Data for patient satisfaction with communication were collected in 2014 (existing records) and each year from 2015 to 2021 (post-program; volunteers) using the MECON survey.

RESULTS

Fifteen basic (n = 161 participants), 16 refresher (n = 84), and five short (n = 17) CST seminars were conducted. Overall, 262 employees (105 physicians, 63 nurses, 36 physio- and occupational therapists, and 58 others) participated; 92 participants (response rate 37.6%) responded to feedback surveys. They rated the seminars positive concerning the alternation between theory, discussion, and practical exercise in 91.3%, and rated the length of the training ideal in 80.2%. Post-program patient satisfaction overall increased from 83.1% (confidence interval (CI) 2.6%) to 90% (CI 0.8%; R2 = 0.776; p= 0.004). It was higher in specific communication-related topics: "receiving information" (81.1%, CI 3.1-90.2%, CI 1.0%; p = 0.003), "being able to bring in concerns" (83%, CI 1.0-90.8%; R2 = 0.707; p = 0.009) and "being treated with respect" (89.4%, CI 2.6-94.4%, CI 0.8%; R2 = 0.708; p = 0.004).

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Inter-professional CST is feasible and well accepted by professionals from various professional groups. During seven years of continuous training, independent patient ratings of satisfaction with professional communication have improved significantly. Participants attest to the training's high credibility and usefulness in everyday life.

TLD-1, a novel liposomal doxorubicin, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation and expansion part of a multicenter open-label phase I trial (SAKK 65/16)

3027

Background: TLD-1 is a novel liposomal doxorubicin that compared favorably to conventional liposomal formulations of doxorubicin in preclinical in vivo mouse breast cancer models. This phase I first-in-human trial is aiming to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics and preliminary activity. Methods: Patients with a maximum of 3 prior lines of systemic chemotherapy and preferably anthracycline-sensitive disease were eligible. TLD-1 was administered on day 1 iv over 60-90 minutes (depending on individual dose) q 21 days, for up to 6 or 9 cycles (according to prior anthracycline-exposure) with premedication of 8mg dexamethasone. Dose escalation with dose levels (DL) 1-7 of 10, 16, 23, 30, 35, 40 and 45mg/m2 started with an accelerated titration design, treating one pt at each DL up to DL6 (40mg/m2) followed by a modified continual reassessment method at DL7 due to observed toxicity. Results: 30 pts (F:M = 24:6) have been treated, one each at DLs 1-6, 15 pts at DL7 and an additional 9 pts at DL6. Most frequent tumor types included breast (n = 13), ovarian (n = 6), cervical cancer (n = 2) and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2). Median age was 67.5 years (range:38-83), 13 pts were exposed to prior anthracyclines. The median number of cycles was 4 (range:1-9). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred during cycle 1. At DLs 1 to 5, no treatment-related G3 AEs (TRAE) were observed. At DL6, there was one case of mucositis G3, one of palmar-plantar-erythrodysesthesia (PPE) G3 and one of anemia and neutropenia G3 each. One patient with pre-existing valvular cardiopathy developed symptoms of heart-failure G3 after 8 cycles. Echocardiography showed severe mitral regurgitation with normal LV-EF. In addition one case of urinary-tract infection G3 was seen. Dose-modifications or -delays due to AEs occurred in 7/50 cycles. At DL7, one case of mucositis G3, 3 events of PPE G3 and one case of fatigue G3 were reported. In addition, one case of infection with shingles occurred. Dose-modifications or -delays due to AEs occurred in 12/61 cycles. Shingles and heart failure were reported as SAEs. All toxicities listed above were categorized as TRAE. 29/30 pts were evaluable for response. Three breast cancer pts had a partial response, 2 at DL7 and 1 at DL6, 14 pts had stable disease. Conclusions: No DLT was observed up to DL7. RP2D was defined at 40mg/m2 due to cumulative PPE G3 at DL7. The trial is ongoing with a comparative PK-part evaluating the two iv liposomal formulations of doxorubicin TLD-1 and Caelyx. Clinical trial information: NCT03387917.

Abstract P2-13-30: First interim analysis from ELEANOR: A multi-national, prospective, non-interventional study (NIS) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor positive (HER2+) early breast cancer observing real-life extended adjuvant treatment with neratinib

Background: Recent advances in (post-)/(neo)adjuvant treatment for HER2+ breast cancer have led to a major reduction in recurrence risk; still a relevant percentage of patients relapses over time, predominantly presenting with distant recurrence. Neratinib is registered in Europe as extended adjuvant treatment for adult patients with HER2+, HR+ early-stage breast cancer (eBC), who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy less than one year ago. In the ExteNET study, neratinib improved the 5-year iDFS absolute-rate by 5.1% versus placebo in this population (90.8% vs. 85.7%; HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.41-0.82]), mainly by prolonging time to development of distant metastases. According to explorative (post-hoc) analyses from ExteNET, the effect might be even more pronounced in patients with non-pCR after neoadjuvant trastuzumab treatment and/or in patients with completion of neratinib therapy (i.e. ≥11 months of neratinib treatment). Diarrhea, the most common grade 3 adverse event (neratinib: 39% without primary diarrhea prophylaxis, median cumulative duration 5 days; placebo: 1%; no grade 4 events) can generally be managed through adequate prophylaxis and treatment management. ELEANOR is the first international NIS to investigate real-world use of neratinib and its treatment management in eBC patients in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Methods: The primary objective of this ongoing NIS is to investigate the rate of patients being adherent to neratinib treatment (i.e. neratinib intake for ≥75% of treatment days). Secondary objectives include detailed patient and disease characteristics, details on prior trastuzumab-based therapies (including pertuzumab and T-DM1), neratinib doses, dose modifications and neratinib treatment management, relapses, safety/tolerability, and quality of life (QoL), among others. 300 adult female patients with HER2+/HR+ eBC are planned in accordance with the SmPC specifications (planned end of documentation: 2023). CANKADO, an application developed to support patient/physician communication, is an integral part of the NIS. Different CANKADO modules can be used optionally, including QoL documentation (EQ-5D-5L- and diarrhea-specific questionnaires) and continuous documentation of health status and symptoms. Results: Between July 2020 and July 2021, 141 patients have been enrolled; patient enrollment is ongoing. The first pre-planned interim analysis will be performed after the 100th patient has been observed for 3 months (data cut July 2021). Here, we will present baseline demographic and tumor characteristics for the first 100 patients, as well as prior trastuzumab-based treatments and first safety and tolerability data of real-world neratinib use. Conclusion: The results of the first interim analysis present a preliminary snapshot of the current treatment landscape and real-life neratinib use in Germany and Austria. The ELEANOR NIS should help to understand adherence to neratinib treatment and use of extended adjuvant HER2-targeted therapy in the current treatment landscape focussing on treatment management after different pre-therapies. The study is funded by Pierre Fabre Pharma GmbH (Freiburg, Germany), Pierre Fabre Pharma Austria (Wels, Austria) and Pierre Fabre Pharma AG (Allschwil, Switzerland).

Citation Format: Diana Lüftner, Rupert Bartsch, Urs Breitenstein, Marija Balic, Christian Jackisch, Volkmar Müller, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Marcus Schmidt, Michael Schwitter, Khalil Zaman, Denise Wrobel, Dagmar Guth, Jürgen Terhaag, Matthias Zaiss, Timo Schinköthe, Nadia Harbeck. First interim analysis from ELEANOR: A multi-national, prospective, non-interventional study (NIS) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor positive (HER2+) early breast cancer observing real-life extended adjuvant treatment with neratinib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-30.

Abstract OT-37-01: Ribociclib-endocrine therapy (ET) combination versus chemotherapy as 1st line treatment in patients (pts) with visceral metastatic breast cancer (BC). A multicenter, randomized phase III trial: SAKK 21/18

Background: Pts with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative BC and visceral metastases have a worse outcome. Despite international guidelines recommending first line ET, many oncologists prefer to treat these pts primarily with chemotherapy, expecting a faster response. Combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with ET was shown to be superior to ET alone, in terms of progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate and time to response, while maintaining QoL. The value of an initial period of chemotherapy followed by ET maintenance+/-CDK4/6i versus upfront ET+CDK4/6i is unknown, particularly in a population with visceral disease and mainly luminal B tumors, usually less endocrine sensitive.Trial design:As cancer response and QoL are the main parameters leading the decision of the oncologists, a composite endpoint “QoL-adjusted early disease control” (QoL-eDC) was developed to assess tumor response (progression-free at 12 weeks) and QoL (no deterioration according to FACT-B). The pts are randomized to: arm A, endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) with ribociclib; arm B, mono-chemotherapy at the choice of the physician for at least 12 weeks - thereafter, a switch to a maintenance ET+/-ribociclib is allowed.Baseline measurements and procedures: ECG, blood count, liver and renal functions, tumor assessment and QoL form (FACT-B, BPI-SF single item “worst pain”). Tumor and QoL assessments are repeated at baseline, on week 6, 12, then every 12 weeks, and at the end of trial treatment. Translational research: Plasma is collected for ctDNA at baseline, week 12, 24, then every 6 months, and at progression. Fresh tissue is collected at baseline and at progression, when feasible. Eligibility: Postmenopausal women presenting hormone receptor positive(ER ≥ 10%) and HER2-negative BC with measurable visceral disease, according to RECIST v1.1. Exclusion criteria include visceral crisis, previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease, prior adjuvant CDK4/6i, symptomatic and uncontrolled brain metastases, or significant organ dysfunction. Specific aims: Primary endpoint is QoL-eDC. Secondary endpoints are DC at 12 weeks, objective response rate (ORR), time to OR, PFS, time to treatment failure, OS at 3 years, overall change in QoL until 24 months or PD, time to QoL deterioration/improvement, time to pain improvement, and adverse events.Statistical methods:Group sequential two proportions non-inferiority design. Hypotheses for QoL-eDC during the first 12 weeks. H0: difference arm B – arm A is ≥ 12.5% and H1: difference arm B – arm A is &lt; 12.5%. With a significance level of 0.05, a power of 0.8 and one interim analysis a sample size of 190 pts in each arm (total sample size increased to 400 pts for potential excluded pts). Interim analysis: after 95 evaluable pts for the primary endpoint in each arm.Testing: one-sided group-sequential z-test with pooled variance according to the statistical design; categorical variables summarized using frequencies and percentages; modelling binary outcomes by logistic regression; time-to-event medians estimated by Kaplan-Meier method (95% CI); treatment effect on time-to-event endpoints assessed using Cox proportional hazard models with stratification factors as strata.Present accrual and target accrual: Recruitment started Q2, 2019. Recruitment on July 07, 2020: 20/400.22 centers are open for inclusion in Switzerland and 1/8 in Belgium. Study activation process is ongoing in Belgium (8 centers), Italy (15 centers) and Austria (5 centers).Contact: Karin Rothgiesser, SAKK Coordinating Center, Switzerland. karin.rothgiesser@sakk.ch ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03905343

Citation Format: Michael Schwitter, Khalil Zaman, Guy Jerusalem, Marina Cazzaniga, Richard Greil, Ursula Strub Ursula, Andreas Mueller, Catrina Uhlmann Nussbaum, Agnès Auteri, Karin Rothgiesser, Daniel Dietrich, Thomas Ruhstaller. Ribociclib-endocrine therapy (ET) combination versus chemotherapy as 1st line treatment in patients (pts) with visceral metastatic breast cancer (BC). A multicenter, randomized phase III trial: SAKK 21/18 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-37-01.

SAKK 19/17: safety analysis of first-line durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 positive, advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2

INTRODUCTION

The safety of first-line (1L) durvalumab in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 (PS2) is unknown. This is an interim unplanned safety analysis of the study SAKK 19/17 for patients with metastatic NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in ≥ 25% of tumor cells and an ECOG PS2 treated with 1L durvalumab. This safety analysis was triggered by the SAKK data and safety monitoring board due to a high mortality rate observed after the recruitment of the first 21 patients.

METHODS

This single-arm phase II study recruited patients with metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 in ≥ 25% and ECOG PS2. Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg every four weeks. The trial aims to recruit 48 patients in total. This report includes safety analyses only. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) Version 5.0. Efficacy data including the primary endpoint overall survival at 6 months and secondary endpoints (objective response rate, progression-free survival, and quality of life) will be reported at a later time point.

RESULTS

The data from 21 patients were available at this interim safety analysis. Among these, 13 deaths (13/21; 62%) were reported, including one treatment-related fatal colonic perforation at 9 months after treatment initiation (1/13; 8%). Twelve deaths were not treatment-related (12/13; 92%), and mostly attributed to tumor progression (10/13; 77%). Of note, seven deaths (7/13; 54%) occurred during the first 5 weeks (range 0.6-4.7 weeks) after treatment initiation. Four (4/7; 57%) were respiratory failures attributed to tumor progression. One of these patients (25%) had pre-existing COPD, and three (75%) had baseline dyspnea grade 2-3 related to the tumor. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) included colonic perforation (grade 5), abdominal pain, and colitis (grade 3 each) in one patient, and fatigue (grade 3) in another. Other Grade ≥ 3 AEs unrelated to treatment were all of pulmonary origin: lung infections (19%), dyspnea (24%), cough (5%), and bronchial obstruction (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

1L durvalumab in patients with ECOG PS2 and metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 25% resulted in an unexpectedly high number of fatal early events due to rapid tumor progression. We recommend to avoid treatment with 1 L durvalumab of patients who are highly symptomatic from the tumor, particularly those with respiratory symptoms. The study is continuing its accrual after an amendment excluding these patients.

Abstract P1-18-01: Incidence of hypocalcemia in patients with metastatic breast cancer under treatment with denosumab: A non-inferiority phase III trial assessing prevention of symptomatic skeletal events (SSE) with denosumab administered every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks: SAKK 96/12 (REDUSE)

Background

Monthly Denosumab (DN) has shown superiority over zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying skeletal related events. Randomized trials have shown that ZA given every 12 weeks (q12w) is non-inferior to ZA given every 4 weeks (q4w). The primary endpoint of the REDUSE-trial is non-inferiority for SSE for DN q12w versus q4w. Here we present early data for hypocalcemia (HC), a secondary endpoint.

Methods

Patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer (BC) not pretreated with DN or Bisphosphonates were randomized 1:1 to receive DN q4w (Arm A) versus q12w (Arm B) after a 3-month induction phase with q4w therapy for both arms. All patients received vitamin D 400 U (VitD) and calcium (Ca) 500 mg daily. Measurement of albumin-corrected serum-Ca was mandatory before each DN injection (HC defined as &lt;2.0 mmol/l like in CTCAE V4.0). This safety interim analysis was performed after 3.5 years of accrual. Patients who received at least 1 dose of DN were considered evaluable.

Results

351 BC-patients are currently included (177 in Arm A, 174 in Arm B). HC was the most common side effect with a rate of 20% in the first 16 weeks (during the induction phase with DN q4w for both Arms) and 19% afterwards (combined for Arms A and B). After week 16 HC-prevalence differed between the two arms: while HC was present in 25% in Arm A (q4w), the rate was only 12% in Arm B (q12w). Grade 3 HC (i.e. corrected Ca 1.5 - 1.74 mmol/l or hospitalisation indicated) was rare (0.3%), no grade 4 HC occurred. After 1 year of treatment, the rate of HC compared to the induction phase had decreased in Arm B but not in Arm A (A: 25%, B: 12%). Since HC improved in more patients in Arm B than in Arm A whereas it worsened in more patients in Arm A than in Arm B, a remarkable difference for HC resulted between the two arms.

Rates of hypocalcemia and change of severity after week 16* Arm A (N = 177)Arm B (N = 174)Rates of hypocalcemian (%)n (%)Patients with hypocalcemia at any time49 (28%)46 (26%)Patients with hypocalcemia after week 16*44 (25%)21 (12%)   Change in hypocalcemia grade after week 16*for the 49 patients with hypocalcemiafor the 46 patients with hypocalcemiaWorsening25 (51%)8 (17%)Stable10 (20%)9 (20%)Improving14 (29%)29 (63%)   *week 16: i.e. the time where the schedules of DN begin to differ between Arm A and Arm BArm A: DN q4w for weeks 1 - 12 and likewise thereafter / Arm B: DN q4w for weeks 1 - 12 and q12w thereafter

Conclusions

In our trial up to 20% of all BC patients treated with DN experienced HC in the q4w induction phase despite mandatory supplementation of VitD and Ca. This rate is considerably higher than the numbers reported in the registration trials of DN (where it was 5.5% for BC). After the induction phase, HC is markedly reduced in the q12w arm compared to q4w. This suggests that DN given q12w has a more favorable long-term safety profile in terms of HC compared to DN q4w.

Citation Format: Müller A, Templeton AJ, Hayoz S, Hawle H, Hasler-Strub U, Schwitter M, Pestalozzi BC, Pagani O, Bützberger P, Wehrhahn T, Rauch D, Inauen R, Betticher D, Zaman K, Bodmer A, Popescu RA, Rothschild S, Schardt J, Borner M, Fuhrer A, Schär C, Gillessen S, von Moos R, For the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Incidence of hypocalcemia in patients with metastatic breast cancer under treatment with denosumab: A non-inferiority phase III trial assessing prevention of symptomatic skeletal events (SSE) with denosumab administered every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks: SAKK 96/12 (REDUSE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-01.

RANK ligand blockade with denosumab in combination with sorafenib in chemorefractory osteosarcoma: a possible step forward?

BACKGROUND

There is no established systemic treatment option for unresectable osteosarcoma progressing after standard chemotherapy. A recently published clinical trial has demonstrated some activity of sorafenib in this situation. Preclinical research suggests a role for the inhibition of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-ĸB ligand (RANKL), but no clinical data have been reported so far.

CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old man was diagnosed with unresectable osteoblastic, osteoblastoma-like osteosarcoma in the C7/Th1 vertebra. The tumour progressed locally despite two lines of chemotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy. On treatment with sorafenib and denosumab, a complete metabolic remission was achieved and is ongoing for over 18 months. Immunohistochemistry revealed an overexpression of RANK and RANKL in the patient's primary tumour.

DISCUSSION

This is the first report of activity achieved by the combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab in a patient with osteosarcoma. It confirms preclinical data on RANK/RANKL inhibition in osteosarcoma and could serve as a hypothesis-generating approach for clinical trials in this patient population.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: who should be tested?

We report the case of a 64-year-old ex-smoker with metastatic poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung and an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in exon 21 (p.L858R) who achieved prolonged clinical benefit from treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The initial diagnosis of SCC of the lung obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy was based on immunohistochemical staining only with positivity for cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 and p63 because morphological diagnosis was not possible. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), not otherwise specified (NOS) favouring SCC are usually not tested for the presence of EGFR mutations, and therefore may not receive EGFR TKI therapy. A bronchoscopic rebiopsy showed small nests of undifferentiated tumour cells with weak immunoreactivity of some tumour cells for CK5/6, p63 and no positivity of some tumour cells for thyroid transcription factor-1. These findings suggested a mixed squamous/glandular immunophenotype that has been missed at the initial biopsy. Our clinical case illustrates the problem of tumour heterogeneity encountered in small bronchoscopic biopsies and the difficulties of evaluating the histological subtype in poorly differentiated carcinomas. Initial bronchoscopy should be performed by an experienced pulmonologist who attempts to obtain sufficient material from different areas of the tumour. In the era of targeted therapy, a remote smoking history in a patient with NOS favouring SCC should also lead to EGFR mutation testing to allow highly effective therapy to be offered to mutation-positive patients.

[Persistent Eosinophilia--differential diagnosis and work-up]

The differential diagnosis of eosinophilia is broad and constitutes a major challenge for both, the general practitioner and the hematologist. Whereas in developing countries secondary eosinophilia is commonly caused by parasitic infections, in Western and European countries eosinophilia is more often associated with atopic diseases or drug-related. This case-report presents an asymptomatic patient with marked persisting eosinophilia caused by Strongyloidiasis in whom parasitic stool examinations were repeatedly negative and infection could only be established by serologic testing.